Quote of the day

I just hope we nominate someone who can win. If Palin can win, then awesome. If the fanboys get her the nomination and then she tanks in the general, then she will be permanently damaged and her supporters will have lost all credibility. Oh and that complete disaster Obama will still be in charge.

WisCon on July 15, 2010 at 11:35 PM

You should go back and look at her career, her entire career, and her REAL record.

Sarah has a record of winning elections. Not just winning, but winning in landslides. She won when everyone said it was impossible.

The only races she ever lost, was for Lt Governor, but she did so well she was appointed to one of the most important jobs in the state, and of course VP, which was the idiot McCain team’s fault. Had they let Sarah be Sarah, we just might have a President McCain right now.

Sarah won’t commit until next year. Right now she is focused on 2012, unlike that worthless COWARD Mitt Romney, who only cares about himself, and being POTUS.

Not even sure if she knows yet, but if she runs, she wins. This is why walking turds like Romney have been sniping at her for over a year through surrogates. Romney is the kind of sniveling sh!t who will smile at you to your face, shake your hand, and stab you in the back, all the same time.

But Willard isn’t man enough to attack someone straight up. He’s a weasel.

Sarah will most likely announce she’s running on Reagan’s birthday, but for her there is absolutely no hurry. The second she enters the race, it’s all over. She’ll have to earn it, of course, and the field will be crowded. But Sarah will easily take out all of the wannabes.

Again, right now, for her, it’s all about 2010. She knows 2012 will take care of itself.

gary4205 on July 16, 2010 at 1:16 AM

I read it.
Lemme tell you, if Hillary is the nominee, you watch all those hillbuzz broads, the PUMA broads, the men who think Palin is stupid, the women who aren’t nearly as attractive peel off and vote for that filthy shrew.

Lanceman on July 15, 2010 at 11:38 PM

You aren’t too bright are you?

The “broads” over at HillBuzz are guys. They have already addressed this issue. They still like Hillary, but she, nor any other democrat, will ever get their vote. That ship has sailed.

They have managed to spend some time with both Sarah and Todd and a couple of events. Those guys will quit their jobs if she runs!

gary4205 on July 16, 2010 at 1:33 AM

Oh, for the love of–!

Let me switch gears from enlightened lansing– student of the philosophes from the headlines to “keep it rull” lansing here:

Hillary is NOT RUNNING in 2012.
She will not, and if she does, she will lose so so so so so bad.
Trashing Hillary in front of anyone who says they “like” her is dumb.
I like Hillary and would never trash her personally.
I wouldn’t call her some “neo-marxist alinsky sellout carpetbagger trophy-power-hungry-wyfe” or whatever.

Anyone who does is ignorant to 2008 and is buying into MSM projection into “EPIC CATFIGHT 2012″ between St. Hillaria and Sister Sarah of the Carmelite Order.

Don’t buy into it. I will call Hillary a sell-out and someone who abandoned the moderates and indies who supported her. I won’t call her anything else, because anything else is counter.pro.ductive.

It cannot be said enough.

lansing quaker on July 15, 2010 at 11:50 PM

You might wanna check this out:

“Obama learned his lesson well. I am proud to see that my father’s model for organizing is being applied successfully beyond local community organizing to affect the Democratic campaign in 2008.

It is a fine tribute to Saul Alinsky as we approach his 100th birthday.” –Letter from L. DAVID ALINSKY, son of Neo-Marxist Saul Alinsky

Obama helped fund ‘Alinsky Academy’: “The Woods Fund, a nonprofit on which Obama served as paid director from 1999 to December 2002, provided startup funding and later capital to the Midwest Academy….

Obama sat on the Woods Fund board alongside William Ayers, founder of the Weather Underground domestic terrorist organization….

‘Midwest describes itself as ‘one of the nation’s oldest and best-known schools for community organizations, citizen organizations and individuals committed to progressive social change.’… Midwest teaches Alinsky tactics of community organizing.”

Hillary, Obama and the Cult of Alinsky: “True revolutionaries do not flaunt their radicalism, Alinsky taught. They cut their hair, put on suits and infiltrate the system from within.

Alinsky viewed revolution as a slow, patient process. The trick was to penetrate existing institutions such as churches, unions and political parties….

Many leftists view Hillary as a sell-out because she claims to hold moderate views on some issues. However, Hillary is simply following Alinsky’s counsel to do and say whatever it takes to gain power.

“Obama is also an Alinskyite…. Obama spent years teaching workshops on the Alinsky method. In 1985 he began a four-year stint as a community organizer in Chicago, working for an Alinskyite group called the Developing Communities Project….

Camouflage is key to Alinsky-style organizing. While trying to build coalitions of black churches in Chicago, Obama caught flak for not attending church himself. He became an instant churchgoer.

http://www.crossroad.to/Quotes/communism/alinsky.htm

Just sayin’

gary4205 on July 16, 2010 at 1:46 AM

Oh, heck no to Perry. I’d vote for the Maverick the day I voted for Perry. Scratch that. I’d vote for Gingrich McCouch sooner than Perry.

MeatHeadinCA on July 16, 2010 at 1:07 AM

Texas is the only state in the union that is booming. We could do worse.

I’ve said this for a LONG time. I’d almost be willing to bet American dollars that Sarah will pick Perry for her Veep. I don’t know why I feel this, I just do.

I know they are friends, and Sarah spends a lot of time in Texas. Those two would make an unbeatable team, and Perry would suck as POTUS after Sarah had her 8. It certainly wouldn’t be like Reagan handing the reins over to Bush 41.

gary4205 on July 16, 2010 at 2:15 AM

btw… I’ve been re-thinking my list. Haley Barbour? Jeb Bush? Mike Ditka?

Mr. Wednesday Night on July 16, 2010 at 1:30 AM

Haley Barbour is a strong Governor, but an old white guy from the south. Like someone said the other night, the dems would just use outtakes from Mississippi Burning as campaign ads!

Jeb Bush is an open borders, give em all amnesty, big spending RINO. Next.

Mike Ditka? Inventive, but uhhh, no.

We got our leader. We just need to get behind her and get in gear. Sarah Palin is as close to Ronald Reagan as any of us will ever live to see.

Leaders like her do not grow on trees.

No one. I mean no one will fight as hard for Liberty and Freedom as Sarah. No one will fight corruption like Sarah will either. She has a loooooong track record of going after corrupt politicians, even her friends that go bad.

This goes back to her earliest days on the Wasilla city council. The fellow that actually talked her into running in the first place owned a waste management company. He was using his position to try and pass an ordinance that would have forced everyone to use his services. Guess who stopped that.

I don’t know, maybe I am just too close to the deal. I have followed this woman for years. Not long after she became Governor. I’ve seen what she is capable of as a CEO.

I look around and for the life of me I have no idea why every single SANE person in this country isn’t behind her. Seriously, to me, personally, one would have to be insane, clinically insane to look around at our choices and potential choices, and pick anyone else.

Is it because she’s a she??

Seriously, what the hell is it? There is no one out there that even comes close to her record of excellence in office.

She would go down in history as one of our greatest presidents. This woman gets stuff done.

gary4205 on July 16, 2010 at 2:46 AM

Thanks for the comeback.

Dire Straits on July 16, 2010 at 2:42 AM

No worries! Might have been a tad worked up!! Willard and his turds really pissed a lot of people off today with his nonsense.

gary4205 on July 16, 2010 at 3:03 AM