Surprise! AMA clout diminishes after helping deliver ObamaCare
posted at 12:55 pm on July 12, 2010 by Ed Morrissey
The American Medical Association went to bat for the Democrats on ObamaCare, campaigning openly for it and giving the Obama administration a number of photo ops that allowed him to claim support from the entire medical community for the top-down overhaul of the American health-care system. In exchange, the AMA hoped to gain enough political IOUs to keep Medicare/Medicaid reimbursement cuts from taking place. Instead, all they got was a few month’s reprieve — and a growing reputation as saps, according to Politico:
Months after delivering its crucial endorsement of the health care overhaul, the American Medical Association has found itself with fewer friends on Capitol Hill and more critics questioning its lobbying savvy.
Its troubles couldn’t come at a worse time: It is more dependent than ever on having allies in Congress, thanks to the growing number of Medicare patients.
The AMA’s most prominent lobbying failure has been its inability to repeal the obsolete formula governing payments for Medicare patients — a method that has for years required regular temporary “fixes” to avoid big pay cuts for doctors.
The problem predicates itself on the AMA’s willingness to prostitute itself on behalf of a basic deception in ObamaCare. Democrats attempted to sell it as a net deficit reducer, but kept the reimbursement cuts in place to do so. The AMA willingly went along with ObamaCare, assured that a side deal would eliminate the cuts, even though that would destroy the economic basis for claiming that the bill would bend the cost curve downward.
At the time, Democrats didn’t think it would take long to get ObamaCare pushed through Congress. The so-called ‘doctor fix’ attempts began last summer, but stalled as attention drew to the problems it would create with the fiscal argument for ObamaCare. Meanwhile, the AMA kept pimping for the overhaul while pressing Democrats to keep their end of the bargain.
Unfortunately, Democrats began looking at the polls — and started scaling back the doctor-fix legislation. Instead of playing along the second time, the AMA attempted to campaign against a compromise bill that would have scaled back the cuts for the next five years rather than repeal them altogether. After spending millions of dollars, they succeeded in stopping the five year plan, but instead Congress adopted a five month fix that will last until just after the November midterms.
Now the AMA has found itself outside of both parties on Capitol Hill. Democrats, having passed ObamaCare with the AMA’s millions of lobbying dollars, has no more use for them. Neither do Republicans, who would rather work with other health-care associations that don’t sell themselves out so easily. The AMA is six million dollars poorer and in the worst shape in which it could possibly be — and they only have themselves to blame for it.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Maybe the AMA and that union that dumped $10million into fighting Blanche Lincoln in AR can get together and cry in their beer…..
ted c on July 12, 2010 at 12:58 PM
It’s funny because I am not an AMA member.
WashJeff on July 12, 2010 at 1:00 PM
I guess being a doctor don’t make you so smart anyhow….
Time after time the dems promise, and they can’t deliver…but Obama seems to be the worst of the worse.
Everyday is a heartache, but every day is renewed hope that people will begin to realize they have been taken by a cheap, ordinary, Chicago street hustler.
right2bright on July 12, 2010 at 1:01 PM
AMA…American Masochists Association.
right2bright on July 12, 2010 at 1:03 PM
I guess the AMA didn’t check about the pay and working conditions of docs in a worker’s paradise.
My idea about the deportation of the illegals and substituting some of the 3 million doctors who want to come to the USA never caught on either.
IlikedAUH2O on July 12, 2010 at 1:03 PM
Only fools partner with Microsoft or Obama.
Daggett on July 12, 2010 at 1:03 PM
I hope the NRA is listening. *cough* Harry Reid *cough*
Fallon on July 12, 2010 at 1:03 PM
The AMA is largely academic eggheads who have little to do with direct patient care. Sounds a lot like the Obama administration, eggheads who have little to do with governing.
BrianA on July 12, 2010 at 1:05 PM
Rot in Pieces AMA. The NRA looks to be following in your foot steps.
Daemonocracy on July 12, 2010 at 1:05 PM
“You idiots have been useful, now get out.”
-PBHO
Bishop on July 12, 2010 at 1:07 PM
Maybe Dr. Feelgood could make a house call….
ted c on July 12, 2010 at 1:07 PM
The Death Panels were AMA approved.
They can drop dead for whoring themselves out to Barry.
portlandon on July 12, 2010 at 1:07 PM
OT I see above AP says Scott Brown is going to vote for financial overhaul bill. Dang, this is a disaster of a bill.
sandee on July 12, 2010 at 1:09 PM
These days, the words collaborate, collaboration, and collaborator generally have neutral or even positive connotations. But back in the WW II days, their connotations were very negative because the words were used to applies to those who worked with the Nazis.
I see the AMA as nothing but collaborators in the negative sense. I’m also reminded of the scene from Band of Brothers in which the townspeople of Einhoven were celebrating their liberation from the Germans. The Dutch men who collaborated with the Germans were shot, and the Dutch women who slept with the Germans had their heads shaved and foreheads marked with swastikas.
I’ll leave it to the non-AMA doctors to deal with the AMA collaborators as they wish, but I wouldn’t be opposed to a nice tar and feathering.
By the way, have patients who oppose Obamacare ever considered boycotting AMA-member physicians? At a minimum, you have to question their smarts for being a member.
BuckeyeSam on July 12, 2010 at 1:11 PM
To be fair, looters never think long term.
Aquateen Hungerforce on July 12, 2010 at 1:11 PM
Always remember that the AMA is a union.
jukin on July 12, 2010 at 1:12 PM
We reap, what we sow. The AMA is finding that out the hard way!
capejasmine on July 12, 2010 at 1:14 PM
Saps. Heh.
LASue on July 12, 2010 at 1:15 PM
Those who oppose the looters do. I suppose one fine day the two sides will need to meet here and there and discuss our differences.
Bishop on July 12, 2010 at 1:16 PM
AMA, AARP deal on ObamaCare, NRA deal on the Disclosure Act, blah blah blah. A pox on all their houses.
petefrt on July 12, 2010 at 1:18 PM
Don’t forget to give a “big thanks” to the scumsucking elderly advisors at the AARP. This “organization” borderlines a criminal element selling Obamacare.
Rovin on July 12, 2010 at 1:19 PM
The true sting that the AMA will experience will likely be a substantial drop in membership renewals.
When I graduated law school 28 years ago, I almost reflexively joined the ABA because I thought that it was a useful emmisary of my profession.
But, in the heat of the 1992 Presidential election, the ABA (at its annual conference in San Francisco) designated Hillary as the person who would introduce the Keynote Speaker, Anita.
At that very same convention, the ABA (probably acting through its Governors or Delegates) adopted a position in favor of Roe v. Wade.
I dropped out at that time and wish that I had never joined it.
An organization should be professional or political, but not both.
The AMA is going to learn this the hard way.
molonlabe28 on July 12, 2010 at 1:19 PM
Whores are yucky…
mjbrooks3 on July 12, 2010 at 1:20 PM
Doctors Threaten to Pull Out of Texas Medicaid
Sugarbuzz on July 12, 2010 at 1:21 PM
What the heck? With Obama’s NASA making Muslims feel good about their contributions to science, math, and engineering, the AMA should soon be flooded with new member applications from positively reinforced Muslim medical students with oodles of self esteem.
That’ll be a whole new meaning to Death Panels.
BuckeyeSam on July 12, 2010 at 1:22 PM
I forgot to add: “Open wide and say, ‘Allah.’”
BuckeyeSam on July 12, 2010 at 1:23 PM
Let’s hope that seniors punish AARP for selling them out.
obladioblada on July 12, 2010 at 1:24 PM
I have little doubt that those in the AMA who were influential in the decision to back Obamacare have and will continue to profit by their decision, regardless of the benefit or damage to the AMA, itself.
Dusty on July 12, 2010 at 1:24 PM
I guess four months was the incubation period for the numerous social diseases the AMA picked up while pimping for The Won. Own it, beeyotches!
ya2daup on July 12, 2010 at 1:26 PM
Being in a position to know, many doctors I regularly communicate with often say that the AMA only represents about 30% of doctors at any given time. They’re often quick to stress that it does NOT represent ‘all doctors,’ as the Obama regime would have you believe.
So they’re pretty much looked at as a political advocacy/lobbying organization within the medical profession as well.
Good Lt on July 12, 2010 at 1:30 PM
Yep. At its high point, the AMA had 70% of practicing physicians in this country. Today that percentage is a paltry remnant as members (I’ve heard 125k out of +|-800k – and that’s been disputed as too high a percentage.) They have student members, plus they boost their totals with free memberships for 1st year residents. Their core constituency is government docs, public health professionals, academics, researchers etc – i.e., those who depend on Big Gov for their paychecks. Even then, a survey of their members found they were at odds with “their” organization’s support of ObamaCare.
The AMA is a joke. In fact, if you discover that your doctor is a paying member, it might be a good idea to ask him to explain why, because unless he or she has a good ulterior rationale, it doesn’t reflect very favorably on the quality of his or her judgment. Let’s just say that the best & brightest with a lick of common sense bailed on the AMA a long time ago, so caveat emptor and all that.
leilani on July 12, 2010 at 1:30 PM
Most of the doctors that I know personally have been saying this about the AMA for many years – that they are a left-leaning, big-government favoring organization, much like AARP.
UltimateBob on July 12, 2010 at 1:33 PM
I quit the AMA over 20 years ago, and I still feel like I need to scrape something off the bottom of my shoes every time I hear their name. Politics over patients? No thanks, and good riddance.
EyeSurgeon on July 12, 2010 at 1:43 PM
Even if Brown votes for the stinker of a bill it doesn’t mean the dems can get to 60 votes because they’ve lost the other Repubs and don’t have Byrd, and there are possibly two other democraps who hate that bill too.
eaglewingz08 on July 12, 2010 at 1:44 PM
Looks like the AMA was operating on the “I hope you eat me last” philosophy. My Doctor is not a member and is pissed at the organization for selling him out.
Uniblogger on July 12, 2010 at 1:45 PM
I am a doctor and I have one thing to say about the AMA
chicagotrauma on July 12, 2010 at 1:50 PM
Obama:
Please leave the white coats at the door on your way out.
pain train on July 12, 2010 at 1:51 PM
Cupidity wouldn’t punish its abettor, would it?
Akzed on July 12, 2010 at 1:51 PM
Sez it all right there. The ‘all-in’ gamble holding a pair of dueces.
Phil-351 on July 12, 2010 at 1:53 PM
this
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aIrhVo1WA78&feature=related
chicagotrauma on July 12, 2010 at 1:53 PM
AMA…American
MasochistsAssociation.right2bright on July 12, 2010 at 1:03 PM
“American Maoists Association”
PatriotRider on July 12, 2010 at 1:56 PM
Now the American Meowist Association…
right2bright on July 12, 2010 at 2:00 PM
AMA, now let’s work on the ABA…
right2bright on July 12, 2010 at 2:04 PM
So the prostitutes got screwed and Barry only gave ‘em a nickel for their troubles. How sad.
If they want to know where to find sympathy, I’ll be more than happy to show them where it is in the dictionary, and between what words they’ll find it.
Perhaps it’s time to replace the ‘leadership’ of the AMA.
GarandFan on July 12, 2010 at 2:08 PM
All I can say is bwahahahahahah but I digress. The AMA used to legitamize Hobama care represents less then 30 percent of doctors and I would bet that percentage is dropping rapidly. Too bad, so sad that they, like the liars at AARP thought they would protect their profits with the wink, wink, nudge, nudge from the flotsam in the White House.
PatriotPete on July 12, 2010 at 2:09 PM
Ed, you’re brutal!
itsnotaboutme on July 12, 2010 at 2:09 PM
Here in Texas the percentage of MDs belonging to AMA was hoverng about 20 percent, prior to talk of ObamaCare. Probably the same after it passed because anyone with a lick of sense was out already.
Marcus on July 12, 2010 at 2:11 PM
I won’t go to a doctor who IS a member of the AMA. My dad was an anesthesiologist and left the AMA in the 1970s when it refused to do anything about the malpractice crisis. He always thought it was useless. I am glad he didn’t live to see the AMA sell out for Obama.
rockmom on July 12, 2010 at 2:11 PM
My brother is a physician and he doesn’t know many others in his profession that give the AMA the time of day.
jnelchef on July 12, 2010 at 2:18 PM
They pretty much lobbied themselves into dependence -right where the Dems wanted them.
taznar on July 12, 2010 at 2:24 PM
Now that we know what you are…
… all that’s left is to agree on a price.
Seven Percent Solution on July 12, 2010 at 2:34 PM
Whenever we get mailings from AARP, I use its pre-paid envelopes and send back a note that no one in my family will ever join AARP because it sold seniors out on Obamacare. Makes my laugh just a little every time I do it.
LASue on July 12, 2010 at 2:46 PM
I’m reminded of Paper Moon, 1973:
theCork on July 12, 2010 at 2:48 PM
What about AARP? My father in law canceled his AARP membership, and paid up for 3 years of NRA membership.
Dr Evil on July 12, 2010 at 2:52 PM
The best use of the words.
antisocial on July 12, 2010 at 2:59 PM
The AARP pushed Ho-care on its membership touting it as a good things but what they didn’t say was that it protected and grew one of their main sources of revenue, medigap insurance so seniors can pay more longer to AARP for coverage they should have gotten from medicare….but nooooooo, ho-care isn’t rationing care or going to be more expensive for those who really need it /sarc off
PatriotPete on July 12, 2010 at 3:25 PM
nice one Ed :)
cmsinaz on July 12, 2010 at 3:32 PM
The twenty’s on the nightstand.
nice one Ed :)
cmsinaz on July 12, 2010 at 3:32 PM
That was a great one—just like the time Ed referred to some idiot, liberal as a carbuncle.
mobydutch on July 12, 2010 at 3:36 PM
lolol
cmsinaz on July 12, 2010 at 3:44 PM
The AMA is largely academic eggheads who have little to do with direct patient care. Sounds a lot like the Obama administration, eggheads who have little to do with governing.
BrianA on July 12, 2010 at 1:05 PM
That is exactly correct. Don’t confuse the AMA with the typical doctor you see. Doctors who actually see patients, like my sister, dropped out of the AMA years ago. It is a Democratic front organization now.
BillCarson on July 12, 2010 at 3:56 PM
Once great institutions like the AMA have almost across the board become corrupt hollow shells of integrity now willing to prostitute themselve’s with fill-in-the-blank endorsements in exchange for having their coffers filled and/or poltical power. It is Ayn Rand’s Fountainhead come to life as I explained in The Methodology of Subversion:
“These intrusions into our personal liberties did not come about in a vacuum. The insidious ways with which the collectivist’s have advanced their cause, have permeated our popular culture, and seized our public narrative is comprehensive. They have partly done so through their infiltration of our societal infrastructure by attaining seats of innocuous sounding boards, philanthropies and various other not-for- profits, through which they have subtlety promoted their policies. It is by these means that the collectivists have donned the veneer of respectability, moved their agenda into the mainstream and disguised their subversive intentions.”
And…
“Ayn Rand illustrated how this political power and influence over the media is promulgated by a barrage of advisory bodies whose consultation is called upon to fill air-time. Associations of so and so, panels on such and such, and councils for this, that, and the other, these are our modern 527’s. Like People for the American Way, Center for American Progress, MoveOn.org and their sister affiliations, these tax-exempt entities which so inundate our political discourse today sway public opinion to their nefarious political ends. The profusion of which was also foreseen by Miss Rand. This is George Soros in the role of Ellsworth Toohy in The Fountainhead.”
http://papundits.wordpress.com/2009/08/01/the-methodology-of-subversion-and-the-undermining-of-liberty/
Archimedes on July 12, 2010 at 4:00 PM
Let’s hope that seniors punish AARP for selling them out.
obladioblada on July 12, 2010 at 1:24 PM
Hubs and I both turn 50 this year, and have been receiving solicitation from the AARP for the past few months, all of which has been returned with not-so-nice notes telling them why we will NEVER join their ranks (the phrase “not one thin dime” has been used). I even went so far as to call the number on their website to ask to have our names removed from their mailing list.
Hey, you sleep with the wrong folks, there’s no tellin’ what kind of cooties you’ll end up with…..
TeresainFortWorth on July 12, 2010 at 4:03 PM
Take two aspirin and call us in December!
chickasaw42 on July 12, 2010 at 5:02 PM
I think you’ve said everything that can (and needs to be) said in those five words.
oldleprechaun on July 12, 2010 at 5:03 PM
When are the corporate idiots going to learn “climbing in bed with a fascist isn’t going to end well”.
David in ATL on July 12, 2010 at 5:03 PM
I’m not paying you to think, honey.
/obama
andycanuck on July 12, 2010 at 6:10 PM
Seven words.
/biden
andycanuck on July 12, 2010 at 6:12 PM
“The twenty’s on the nightstand.”
let me add in my lmao for this zinger
DaMav on July 12, 2010 at 7:22 PM
I couldn’t agree more. Count me as another practicing physician who wouldn’t give the AMA a dime.
humdinger on July 12, 2010 at 10:04 PM
One problem with the big professional associations such as the AMA is, while individual members may tend towards being individualist/conservatives, the leadership of these organizations are populated by collectivists — aka, liberal RINOs at best, Obamacrats at worse. Leadership views and goals are disconnected from membership views, …
drfredc on July 12, 2010 at 10:55 PM
At some point, every hooker losers her charm and allure to the point that not even the most desperate Johns are interested.
Guess the AMA has reached that point.
AZfederalist on July 12, 2010 at 11:18 PM
Do not rescusitate the AMA.
seven on July 13, 2010 at 1:40 PM