Kennedy: I think I’ll stick around until 2013
posted at 10:55 am on July 6, 2010 by Ed Morrissey
Increasingly, Justice Anthony Kennedy has become the most important member of the Supreme Court. After the retirement of Sandra Day O’Connor, Kennedy serves as the swing vote between the conservative and liberal blocs on the Court, siding more often with conservatives (but not often enough for their taste). At 74, though, Kennedy is at an age when most men think of retirement — and his departure would set off a political firestorm on Capitol Hill the likes of which haven’t been seen since Clarence Thomas endured his trial by fire in the Senate.
And maybe that’s why Kennedy tells close friends and relatives that he wants to wait a while before retiring … or perhaps it’s because of the man who would pick his successor:
Justice Kennedy, who turns 74 this month, has told relatives and friends he plans to stay on the high court for at least three more years – through the end of Obama’s first term, sources said.
That means Kennedy will be around to provide a fifth vote for the court’s conservative bloc through the 2012 presidential election. If Obama loses, Kennedy could retire and expect a Republican President to choose a conservative justice.
Kennedy, appointed by President Ronald Reagan, has been on the court 22 years. He has become a bit of a political nemesis at the White House for his increasing tendency to side with the court’s four rock-ribbed conservative justices.
In fact, as the New York Daily News implies, Kennedy may have made that decision after this year’s State of the Union address:
Without naming Kennedy, Obama was unusually critical of his majority opinion in the Citizens United case, handed down last January. That 5-4 decision struck down limits on contributions to political campaigns as an abridgement of free speech.
Obama called the ruling “a major victory for big oil, Wall Street banks, health insurance companies and the other powerful interests that marshal their power … in Washington to drown out the voices of everyday Americans.”
He was so angry that he took the unusual step of blasting the decision in his Jan. 27 State of the Union address, with Kennedy and five other justices looking on.
Obama certainly reveled in his prime-time, televised, cheap-shot attack at jurists who couldn’t fire back. Samuel Alito took fire from the media for having just mouthed a rebuttal. The only revenge any of them can take is to make sure that they stay in place until Obama leaves office. The “at least” part of the report almost certainly means that retirement at 80 may be just as possible as retirement at 76. After all, John Paul Stevens didn’t decide to retire until he was almost 90 years old.
Perhaps the timing is just a coincidence and Kennedy didn’t have plans to retire any earlier even prior to the 2008 election. However, this looks more like a quiet revenge, and a reminder to Obama that Kennedy will likely remain relevant longer than the President.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »
in the words of our absent AP
oh snap
blatantblue on July 6, 2010 at 10:57 AM
Party pooper!
Shy Guy on July 6, 2010 at 10:58 AM
From your mouth to God’s ears! Please, Lord!
itsnotaboutme on July 6, 2010 at 10:58 AM
Kennedy has taken pity on his fellow Justices. He figures two people in the room babbling on with inane drivel is quite enough, thank you very much.
Wind Rider on July 6, 2010 at 11:00 AM
Not a huge surprise but a very welcome bit of news. Although he’s still on my $hit list for Kelo vs New London.
Monica on July 6, 2010 at 11:00 AM
I’m praying for Justice Kennedy’s continued good health!
rhbandsp on July 6, 2010 at 11:01 AM
Wow. Good for him.
Darksean on July 6, 2010 at 11:01 AM
He’s doing his part. Now we need to make sure there’s a good Conservative in office in 2013. We should probably say an extra prayer for the good health of our Justices.
hawksruleva on July 6, 2010 at 11:02 AM
Just hang in there for 2 1/2 more years, pal. Oh, and that goes for you too, Ginsburg.
Doughboy on July 6, 2010 at 11:02 AM
What a revoltin’ development – right Barry?
50sGuy on July 6, 2010 at 11:03 AM
Off topic a bit, but I think it unwise to even imply the haloed one’s demise in 2012. The 2010 midterms are still 4 months off and there are many positive signs, but as far as i know, no votes have yet been counted. As for 2012. if the GOP has a major success this Fall there is the precedent of 1996 to consider, and the fact that the American people may want to retain a divided federal govt. The old sports cliche applies. Take it one game at a time.
xkaydet65 on July 6, 2010 at 11:03 AM
He’s been listening to the Wise Latina with one ear and Kagan with the other and figured that yes, it could get even worse.
Bishop on July 6, 2010 at 11:04 AM
The way Obama is destroying the economy, everyone is going to have to wait until 80 to retire anyway. He can hang in there a few more.
Disturb the Universe on July 6, 2010 at 11:04 AM
Or, in the language of community organizing, “racist.”
RBMN on July 6, 2010 at 11:05 AM
For all the hoopla that is made about Obama’s supposed superior intellect, this is just another example of its absence actually… A more experienced, politically astute, less narcississitic, intelligent, shrewd and calculating politician would never have alienated the court right out of the shoot!! Never! He seems to believe there are no consequences FOR HIM to say and do whatever he pleases. Well champ, there are! And you are now reaping them!!! LOL!
JAM on July 6, 2010 at 11:06 AM
When freedom hangs by a string, there are still patriots who know what to do.
Thank you Justice Kennedy. A grateful Nation thanks you.
portlandon on July 6, 2010 at 11:07 AM
Oh Suhhnnnaaaapppp!!!!!! is right!!!!!
huskerdiva on July 6, 2010 at 11:07 AM
Here’s to the health of the 5 members who respect the Constitution.
forest on July 6, 2010 at 11:07 AM
I like his optimism – Obama out in 2013.
faraway on July 6, 2010 at 11:07 AM
xkaydet65 on July 6, 2010 at 11:03 AM
The 1994-1996 comparisons may be a bit off, IMHO.
Clinton won in 1996 in part because he was willing to triangulate and then steal credit for anything that would make him look good, like welfare reform when he finally signed it into law after the third time it hit his desk.
Obama likely won’t do that because he’s a petulant child who will throw tantrums when he doesn’t get his way. He wants the world and he wants it now. If he doesn’t get it, he’ll lash out.
teke184 on July 6, 2010 at 11:08 AM
Wow, I had no idea Justice Kennedy was such a racist.
greggriffith on July 6, 2010 at 11:08 AM
Praying for Kennedy’s health (never thought I’d write that sentence). Still, Justice — watch your back and get a food taster :-)
Absolutely. Add Gonzales v. Raich to that one (commerce clause), and Comstock (necessary and proper clause) – if it ends up being another case a majority on SCOTUS uses to find that Obamaca is constitutional…
Firefly_76 on July 6, 2010 at 11:08 AM
AMEN brother!
VegasRick on July 6, 2010 at 11:08 AM
“Thanks be to God.”
Akzed on July 6, 2010 at 11:09 AM
Amen!
if for some strange reason dear leader wins re-election, he better hang on until Jan 20,2017….
cmsinaz on July 6, 2010 at 11:09 AM
Looks like Barry’s little petulant outburst at the State of the Union has backfired on him. Couldn’t happen to a more deserving “constitutional law expert.” Chump.
AZCoyote on July 6, 2010 at 11:10 AM
That First Presidential Temper Tantrum(TM)is on its’ way. I look for it the night that the mid-term results roll in.
kingsjester on July 6, 2010 at 11:11 AM
Oh Thank God!
gophergirl on July 6, 2010 at 11:11 AM
Ain’t. Gonna. Happen.
VegasRick on July 6, 2010 at 11:11 AM
While I disagree with Kennedy, may he stick around one day longer than Obama and retire in good health. Obama would pick O’Brien from Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-four.
Holger on July 6, 2010 at 11:12 AM
Character, sometimes it shows up late …
Next time I bet it first in the mind of presidential voters.
tarpon on July 6, 2010 at 11:13 AM
Just 929 days to go….but who’s counting!
Noocyte on July 6, 2010 at 11:13 AM
please be true…
cmsinaz on July 6, 2010 at 11:13 AM
yuck!
cmsinaz on July 6, 2010 at 11:13 AM
“Obamaca” = Obamacare
Where’s crr6? Must be stewing…
Firefly_76 on July 6, 2010 at 11:14 AM
Is Kagen taking the place of Ruth Badder, or is the O trying to make his odds 50-50.
CynicalOptimist on July 6, 2010 at 11:16 AM
Agreed! But take heart: if mid-terms are as much of a rout as it’s increasingly looking, then it might be entertaining to watch him squirm impotently for much of that remaining time!
Noocyte on July 6, 2010 at 11:17 AM
I can hear it in the Oval Office from the Junior President from Illinois—-
“I sure picked a bad time to quit smoking”
dirtseller on July 6, 2010 at 11:17 AM
Hey, Sortero. Actions have consequences and words mean things.
It must really suck to be you.
GrannyDee on July 6, 2010 at 11:17 AM
Long life and good health, Justice Kennedy!
Khun Joe on July 6, 2010 at 11:18 AM
Love the way you think. I’m in your camp. The media spin on either his defeat or withdrawal from the race will be utterly historic. Somebody is going to have a nervous breakdown on air.
sherry on July 6, 2010 at 11:18 AM
“he plans to stick around for at least 3 more years” = “In your face, Mr. Obama.”
LASue on July 6, 2010 at 11:19 AM
Obama’s only hope for re-election is getting Democrats thrown out by the bushel this fall and getting in enough Republicans to turn things around.
I don’t think two years is enough though.
Still think he ends up not even running for re-election. Then he can work on taking the title of “worst ex-president” from Jimmy Carter as well.
NoDonkey on July 6, 2010 at 11:19 AM
Kagan would replace Stevens.
Wethal on July 6, 2010 at 11:20 AM
I’d pay good money to see that.
GrannyDee on July 6, 2010 at 11:20 AM
wonder how it would’ve played had SCOTUS got up and walked out of SOTU address after Obama dissed them
jp on July 6, 2010 at 11:21 AM
Time for another speech!
Heaven help me but I’m enjoying some of the unintended consequences of the Teleprompter Presidency.
Drained Brain on July 6, 2010 at 11:22 AM
Fat chance on Ginsburg. Souter’s retirement came out of the blue and probably surprised Stevens and Ginsburg. I’m convinced that after Souter’s retirement, Stevens and Ginsburg agreed that Stevens could retire first because he’s older, followed by Ginsburg.
In all events, I bet Ginsburg will retire after the next term or two and no later than next summer. She wants to ensure that Obama nominates her replacement. I doubt she’ll cut it too close to the end of Obama’s current term in case he loses.
BuckeyeSam on July 6, 2010 at 11:23 AM
Obamacide coming to the SC. Watch for it.
SirGawain on July 6, 2010 at 11:24 AM
Thank you Founding Fathers.
Even as the criminals dedicate themselve to subverting your masterwork, your amazing creation enables the forces of good to confront them.
Stay strong America.
November, vote or submit forever.
notagool on July 6, 2010 at 11:24 AM
There is no way he can really “intimidate” them. Roosevelt tried his court-packing only after he won in a landslide in 1936 (and couldn’t get it through Congress), and also got to replace a justice after 1936, which helped shift votes on SCOTUS in favor of the New Deal.
Obama doesn’t realize that the Supreme Court (like a mayor of Chicago whose last name is Daley) holds office for life.
They will be there after he’s gone.
Wethal on July 6, 2010 at 11:25 AM
I would not consider 1996 to be very informative for today since Clinton did not get a majority of the vote. Quite similar to Woodrow Wilson in his second term when a third party was present. No third party who actually wins? And Bob Dole is currently competing with John McCain in my head as the worst Republican presidential candidate in my life time.
NotCoach on July 6, 2010 at 11:25 AM
Thanks!
CynicalOptimist on July 6, 2010 at 11:26 AM
I’d love to know what C.J. John Roberts really thinks of Obama. It must chap his a$$ to have to listen to Barry criticizing his opinions when Roberts knows that Barry is an intellectual fraud whom Roberts could easily decimate in any argument over the merits of Roberts’ legal analyses. It’s just too bad the public will never get to hear that debate; then they could hear for themselves what a truly “brilliant” intellect sounds like — and contrast it with Obama’s fumbling, stuttering stupidity.
AZCoyote on July 6, 2010 at 11:26 AM
EVERYBODY take their vitamins!
tree hugging sister on July 6, 2010 at 11:26 AM
Kennedy took one look at the 2 appointess Obama’s made so far and decided that goin’ fishin’ can wait a couple of more years. Good for him!
DrAllecon on July 6, 2010 at 11:26 AM
Thank you, Justice Kennedy. Our nation turned its lonely eyes to you and you answered. By the way, it might be a good idea for you to invest in some high quality bodyguards at this time. Call me.
jakev on July 6, 2010 at 11:28 AM
I’ll pray for his continued good health.
rollthedice on July 6, 2010 at 11:29 AM
You will notice that ObaMao NEVER lobs his inflammatory remarks, lies, and strawmen in a venue where debate is possible. All of ObaMao’s statements or speeches or interviews take place in carefully controlled settings. No demands for clarification or corrections are ever made.
The SC justices who are real Constitutional scholars would wipe the floor with ObaMao the Phony.
onlineanalyst on July 6, 2010 at 11:31 AM
Thank You Justice Kennedy.
heshtesh on July 6, 2010 at 11:32 AM
I take it Stevens is a Lib.
CynicalOptimist on July 6, 2010 at 11:33 AM
As I recall, he had previously vetoed welfare reform twice.
Clinton also took credit for the “economic recovery” that began in March of 1991, 18 months before the media got him elected on the false premise that “it’s the economy, stupid”. The Fed said the recovery began at that time, but the media never reported it until 9 years later.
Del Dolemonte on July 6, 2010 at 11:34 AM
A study questioning just how much free will people actually have got some ink over the last few days. Essentially, the study suggests that people are subject to subconscious influences to a far greater degree than they understand or appreciate.
Obama is a prime example of someone who, despite intellectual gifts, is unable to respond logically and rationally in many situations because he is driven by ego needs of which he is largely unaware.
To overcome, at least to the extent possible, those subconscious influences requires relentless and merciless self-examination and self-criticism. Damned few people today understand themselves in any fundamental way. They don’t even recognize the problem exists. Even fewer have the courage, determination and self-discipline required to gain the understanding of themselves necessary to recognize and overcome those ego needs and behave more rationally and thoughtfully.
The spoiled children of the Left, the dilettantes and over-educated dunces, are largely clueless in this regard.
novaculus on July 6, 2010 at 11:35 AM
Perhaps Roberts reminds himself of the Spanish proverb, “Living well is the best revenge.”
He’ll live well and continue to decide cases after Obowma is gone.
Wethal on July 6, 2010 at 11:37 AM
Yes, and he was a lib who reportedly could influence Kennedy, the swing vote. I doubt the two new lefty women that Obowma’s put on the court will have much influence with Kennedy. He’s been there for years.
Wethal on July 6, 2010 at 11:39 AM
If this was on FaceBook, I’d click the like button :-)
wytammic on July 6, 2010 at 11:40 AM
Pelican Brief stuff?
BuckeyeSam on July 6, 2010 at 11:40 AM
Great. Now all we have to do is get a Republican in office in 2012. Noooooo problem. O__O
Dongemaharu on July 6, 2010 at 11:42 AM
Turf War. Wish Congress would try to maintain some of its power in the face of Executive overreach, instead of throwing it at Obama with both hands.
txmomof6 on July 6, 2010 at 11:45 AM
Who else is willing to stand up to the destruction of the USA in part controlling of the Supreme Court by Obama?
Any elected Republicans paying attention?
Hening on July 6, 2010 at 11:46 AM
I suppose that many of you read this LA Times link at Drudge: http://www.latimes.com/news/health/la-na-court-roberts-obama-20100706,0,7184862.story
It’s too bad that journalists do not accurately identify Roberts as a defender of the Constitution. The Lefty narrative that conservative lawmakers and judges are pawns for big business is so invalid and so boilerplate. Can’t the yoyos look a little more deeply into the issues and arguments?
onlineanalyst on July 6, 2010 at 11:48 AM
Citizens United did no such thing, thought the media pretends that it did It was about expenditures, not contributions. Our newest supreme court justice famously did not know the difference, either.
CTD on July 6, 2010 at 11:48 AM
He darn well better stay in that seat until there’s a Republican in office. If he wants to have some quiet revenge while doing so – fine, but he better be prepared to stay past 2016 if God forbid, our current rookie in chief gets reelected.
Jill1066 on July 6, 2010 at 11:48 AM
The fact that the o is stacking the court with liberal women has escaped the diversity police’s sight.
CynicalOptimist on July 6, 2010 at 11:48 AM
When Obuma hears this, he is going to throw a tantrum that belongs in the Spoiled Brats Hall of Fame. He may pout for weeks.
volsense on July 6, 2010 at 11:49 AM
I’m sure Obama is figuring out a way to get SCOTUS to 11 members.
ButterflyDragon on July 6, 2010 at 11:49 AM
I agree; though you can tell that Ginsburg wants to stay on the court some while more. I wonder what will win out.
I am starting to think that if a consequential abortion case would go up now, Kennedy would write a very pro-life decision. He’s not enamored with the left anymore. Also, for the partial-birth case, he had a lot of pro-life language in it.
TimTebowSavesAmerica on July 6, 2010 at 11:55 AM
He sides with us over the Second. Good enough for me.
MadisonConservative on July 6, 2010 at 11:56 AM
Kennedy to Obama:
fossten on July 6, 2010 at 11:58 AM
Okay.. Kennedy can be a freaking moron at times. But let me point out this. he likes to “tips” the island so to speak at times. Now when 2012 comes around and we may still have Capt KickAss around.. what then?
Yeah.. damn me the dooms dayer.
upinak on July 6, 2010 at 12:01 PM
Obama to Kennedy: I won.
Who knew that Justice Kennedy was a raaaaaaaaaaaacist? Or is he a distraction? I can’t keep them straight.
/s
Dr.Cwac.Cwac on July 6, 2010 at 12:01 PM
A la the way that Roosevelt threatened SCOTUS if it found Social Security (and other Depression-era legislation) unconstitutional?
Dr.Cwac.Cwac on July 6, 2010 at 12:02 PM
Well Zero. how is that hope and CHANGE working fer ya ?
KATDADDY on July 6, 2010 at 12:05 PM
I hope the suit over Arizona’s law gets to the SCOTUS before 3 years are up.
LASue on July 6, 2010 at 12:06 PM
Agree with the commenters who said we need to pray for the health of Justice Kennedy, as well as the other conservatives on the Court. Our salvation hangs on that.
silvernana on July 6, 2010 at 12:08 PM
I’ve never been a fan of Justice Kennedy, but good on him for showing some backbone in the face of the Obama regime.
WannabeAnglican on July 6, 2010 at 12:09 PM
That should become true beginning when those elected on November 2nd take office.
CC
CapedConservative on July 6, 2010 at 12:10 PM
so ginsburg will retire shortly then I take it? so that dear leader will have 3 of his cronies on the bench before 2012?
cmsinaz on July 6, 2010 at 12:11 PM
Thanks Justice Kennedy. I hope President Palin nominates Mark Levin to replace you.
RobCon on July 6, 2010 at 12:12 PM
What happened to “The Gang of 14″? Did they somehow bless Kagan and I mised it? Oh, yeah… that was McCain and Associates. I’m no fan of JD Hayworth at all but he wouldn’t be nearly as bad as McCain for the next 6 years.
CC
CapedConservative on July 6, 2010 at 12:20 PM
Ginsburgh will retire next.
What I am wondering is if she will retire the minute that Kagen is passed.
I suspect Ginsburgh will NOT wait for the 2010 mid-term and what may well be a majority Republican senate.
It is unclear to me what the rules are on appointing someone for the following court during the current court.
Freddy on July 6, 2010 at 12:21 PM
Justice Kennedy,
Oh won’t you stay just a little bit longer
Oh please, please stay just a little bit more
Gang-of-One on July 6, 2010 at 12:31 PM
How perilous are our times…
The narcissistic suit without an emperor “misovercalculated”, as GWB would say.
Schadenfreude on July 6, 2010 at 12:31 PM
Even if she retired now, with Kagan yet to be approved, it would be hard for them to cram in her replacement between now and November.
It would put an uncomfortable spotlight on some vulnerable Dems like Harry Reid who will have to take time away from their re-election campaigns to get them approved.
teke184 on July 6, 2010 at 12:32 PM
“How you likin’ me now, PeBO?
mojo on July 6, 2010 at 12:34 PM
Ugh. Obama is probably going to nominate two more justices.
terryannonline on July 6, 2010 at 12:35 PM
Sure hope so. I expect Øbama to bring on a Constitutional crisis before 2012 elections.
Obama and Supreme Court may be on collision course
petefrt on July 6, 2010 at 12:35 PM
Me too.
petefrt on July 6, 2010 at 12:38 PM
If all else remains constant, it will be trading a lib for a lib, like Wise Latina and Kagan.
They will still be outnumbered, 5-4.
Close, too close for comfort, but not a majority.
The real batlle will be if there is a sudden health crisis forcing Kennedy, Thomas or Scalia off the bench before Obama is gone.
That will change the balance with a fresh lifetime appointment.
Even Roberts and Alito were replacing votes reliably on the right side, more so Rhenquist than O’Connor.
If a real shift is possible, there will be an all out war on Capitol Hill, whether it is during Obama’s term, or a conservative President after him gets a chance to replace a lefty with a righty.
All. Out. WAR.
Brian1972 on July 6, 2010 at 12:44 PM
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »