NRA e-mail: You know who’s pretty great on guns? Harry Reid

posted at 5:47 pm on July 2, 2010 by Allahpundit

Two readers saw our post yesterday and independently e-mailed the NRA in a panic. Surely, surely, the organization isn’t about to endorse … Harry Reid, is it?

Here’s what each of them got in reply. One simple question as you read: Why didn’t this e-mail end after the first two paragraphs?

Thank you for contacting NRA-ILA regarding the recent rumor that NRA-PVF has indicated they will endorse Harry Reid.

Regarding any potential endorsement of Sen. Reid in the upcoming elections, NRA-PVF has not yet announced any ratings or endorsements in this race. Ratings and endorsements will be determined closer to the election. It is important to note, however, that the NRA is a single issue organization and that when our ratings and endorsements are announced, they are based solely on a candidate’s support for, or opposition to, our Second Amendment rights. Other issues, as important as they may be to many people, do not and cannot play any role in those decisions. NRA represents a broad coalition of American gun owners, who are bound together by their support for the right to keep and bear arms.

In 2004, Senator Reid was rated “B” in his reelection by the NRA Political Victory Fund. Since then, as U.S. Senate Majority Leader, Senator Reid has proven himself to be a supporter of our Second Amendment rights. It would be accurate to say that few, if any, of NRA’s legislative victories in Congress during the last six years would have occurred without his active support.

As an example, he was instrumental in Senate passage (and eventual enactment into law) of the “Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act” (PLCAA)”, which shut down reckless lawsuits against gun manufacturers and dealers that attempted to hold them liable for the misuse of firearms by criminals. Sen. Reid also cosponsored S. 659 (PLCCA) in the 108th Congress and voted against “poison pill” amendments to it, including the Feinstein Amendment to renew the federal ban on so-called “assault weapons”, and the Kennedy Amendment that would have banned most hunting ammunition.

Following Hurricane Katrina, he voted for legislation, that is now federal law, to prohibit gun confiscation during states of emergency. He also voted for legislation to allow commercial airline pilots to be armed in the cockpit to protect their passengers and crew. In this congressional session, Sen. Reid voted for the Ensign Amendment to repeal Washington D.C.’s gun ban and restore self-defense rights in our nation’s capital. He cosponsored similar legislation–S. 1414–in the 108th Congress. He also voted for an amendment to allow law-abiding citizens to carry firearms for self-defense in national parks and wildlife refuges. This federal policy change just took effect on February 22.

Early last year, Sen. Reid emphatically stated that he would oppose any effort to reinstate an “assault weapons” ban if the Senate were to vote on it in the future. In addition, he voted last year for the Thune-Vitter Amendment to provide national reciprocity for state Right-to-Carry permits. He also voted twice for the Wicker Amendment allowing Amtrak passengers to include firearms in their checked luggage. These votes were possible only because of Senator Reid’s actions in his capacity as Senate Majority Leader. Finally, he was among the 58 Senators who signed the pro-gun congressional amicus brief in the McDonald v. Chicago case, argued before the U.S. Supreme Court on March 2nd, which will decide whether the Second Amendment applies to all states and localities.

Most recently, the NRA worked with Sen. Reid to include in his manager’s amendment to the health care reform bill a provision that prohibits the disclosure or collection of information relating to the lawful ownership, use or storage of firearms or ammunition and also prohibits lawful gun ownership, possession and use from being used as a factor to determine eligibility or premium rates for health insurance. This provision was adopted on December 22, 2009 and was included in this legislation when it was signed into law on March 23.

Finally, Senator Reid is opposed to any anti-gun treaties that might come before the U.S. Senate for ratification.

These are a few examples of Senator Reid’s support and leadership on Second Amendment issues. Given the Senate could vote on gun-related issues in the coming months, rest assured any votes will be considered in future candidate evaluations. Regarding NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre and NRA-ILA Executive Director Chris Cox recently attending the grand opening of the Clark County Shooting Park (CCSP) with U.S. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) and other Nevada elected officials.

The CCSP is the largest shooting park in the world. This 2,900-acre state-of-the-art facility is devoted entirely to the shooting sports and is the nation’s premier shooting park. As the nation’s largest shooting sports organization, the NRA’s presence at the ribbon-cutting ceremony should come as no surprise. NRA actively worked with several Members of the Nevada congressional delegation, including Senator Reid, to ensure that this range was built. The development and construction of the CCSP has the full bipartisan support of the Nevada congressional delegation, and Nevada’s Republican Governor.

Senator Reid was instrumental in arranging not only the transfer of the then-federal lands to Clark County where the Park is located, but also in securing $61 million in funding to develop and build the Park. The Clark County Shooting Park would not have been built without his active efforts and support.

Once again, thank you for your inquiry.

If you didn’t read Erick Erickson’s post raising the alarm about the NRA and Reid, scroll through it and note how many anti-gun votes he’s taken over the years. Granted, few of them are recent — only one since 2005 — but surely his record, Angle’s record, and the prospect of thousands of angry Republican NRA donors tearing up their checkbooks point towards endorsing Angle. Right? Exit question: They’re going to end up endorsing no one in this race, aren’t they?


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

If the NRA will damn the rest of the Constitution for a single amendment, what do they think is going to happen to that amendment??

jeffersonschild on July 3, 2010 at 1:18 PM

Okay so CrazyGene is doing “damage control” for the NRA by using leftist tactics of declaring anyone who might give a second thought to their NRA membership to be idiots, morons, falling for GOA propaganda, etc.

I’ve got news for you CrazyGene: the current climate in this nation, since you apparently haven’t been paying attention, is leaning toward a total defense of ALL rights, not just gun rights. To dismiss the concern of people who: a) can’t stand Harry Reid; b) are concerned not just for gun rights but for the right of privacy in donations and the right of free speech; c) concerned that the NRA might just be a sell-out organization not concerned with gun rights at all but with the gathering of MONEY unto itself (like the unions) is pretty moronic in and of itself. And suicidal.

I am a member of the NRA. So’s my husband and our daughter. Will we renew? Maybe not. Most likely not. Why not? Because we are a family that has in one way or another and on separate occasions sworn oaths to support and defend the Constitution: ALL of it, not just those portions that we have a special interest in. We are not a single issue family and we are not selfish and self-absorbed. If our rights to speak freely are secure, while others do not enjoy that right, then the oaths we swore mean nothing. Equal justice. Equal rights. So, sorry Gene who is crazier than he realizes! Our problem NOW is that we are being run by narcissists. I don’t necessarily want to give money to an organization which is itself becoming narcissistic. Under the Constitution, all rights are important and worthy of fighting for OR none are. We can’t pick and choose.

As to the exit question: will the NRA end up endorsing anyone? First they need to find out what they REALLY stand for, but my gut reaction is, no. I don’t live in Nevada and who they endorse doesn’t DIRECTLY affect me, but, were I a resident, I’d vote for Angle.

Driefromseattle on July 3, 2010 at 1:21 PM

Most of the “I’m canceling my NRA membership over this” is b.s. from folks who were never members or supporters in the first place.

The single-issue NRA, of which I am a life member and who will inherit most of my possessions gave us a Republican Congress in the last decade. Unfortunately, the right demonstrated themselves to be nearly as greedy as the left. (thank you Randall Cunningham you bastard). I am dismayed to see Crist and Reid featured at conventions, but despite being disgusted by each, they have toed the line. I still wouldn’t vote for either, but once the NRA starts filtering support, land mines and dilution of power result.

We are winning the 2A argument. The other issues can be solved at the ballot box.

trl on July 3, 2010 at 1:49 PM

If the NRA does endorse Reid you can bet your sweet bibby I’m gone from the ranks. This one issue organization thing doesn’t cut it.

steelman on July 3, 2010 at 2:54 PM

Erick Erickson has zero credibility with me and his post on Reid is a perfect example of why. Criticizing Reid for supporting the Brady Bill in ’93 is a fair criticism (presumably that’s part of the reason he used to be B rated rather than A) but to harp on Reid having “[v]oted for the Clinton Crime Bill, which contained the ban on so-called ‘assault weapons’” without noting that he voted against the AW ban itself is downright dishonest. As is making a separate listing out of the fact that he voted for cloture on the very same bill on the very same day. It’s almost as if Erickson was counting on the reader not to actually read his entries at all, but simply count them instead.

Reid sucks overall but from a Second Amendment perspective, i can think of few worse things that can happen than for Reid to lose and the Dems to retain (or, for that matter, ever again regain) control of the Senate. Gun rights actually got better under Senate Majority Leader Reid. Does anyone in his right mind expect the same result from Senate Majority Leader Schumer or Durbin?

Xrlq on July 3, 2010 at 9:39 PM

I just joined the NRA last winter. I most certainly WILL NOT be continuing my membership if they support the likes Reid.

Hendo on July 3, 2010 at 10:55 PM

Leftist Reid thinks the long term goal of absolute power is within grasp, so stroking the NRA is no problem. The NRA stands at the abyss and if they jump, they will enjoy the good company of AMA, AARP, BP, former CEOs…

NRA doesn’t understand the information age or the current crisis. Their base knows what’s going on, is already in a foul mood, and one hair-trigger from snapping their wallets shut for good.

Feedie on July 4, 2010 at 4:27 AM

Most recently, the NRA worked with Sen. Reid

Clear the decks…prepare for electoral battle…

Michael Steele & Wayne LaPierre to the brig, in irons,
for providing aid & comfort to the enemy!

“Let’s Roll”

On Watch on July 5, 2010 at 5:37 AM

If the NRA could figure out that the 2nd might save the whole of the Constitution and the Republic and work from that point of view we might calm down,MIGHT!

Col.John Wm. Reed on August 27, 2010 at 6:28 PM

Comment pages: 1 2