Will Obama kill missile defense in new treaty?

posted at 3:20 pm on June 29, 2010 by Ed Morrissey

During the presidential campaign, Barack Obama promised to kill expensive missile-defense programs. John Noonan believes Obama may have fulfilled that promise in a pledge made yesterday that would “all but kill missile defense” systems that are proving successful. The administration broadly hinted at banning the use of ballistic missiles in space:

The Obama administration on Monday unveiled a space policy that renounces the unilateral stance of the Bush administration and instead emphasizes international cooperation, including the possibility of an arms control treaty that would limit the development of space weapons.

In recent years, both China and the United States have destroyed satellites in orbit, raising fears about the start of a costly arms race that might ultimately hurt the United States because it dominates the military use of space. China smashed a satellite in January 2007, and the United States did so in February 2008.

The new space policy explicitly says that Washington will “consider proposals and concepts for arms control measures if they are equitable, effectively verifiable and enhance the national security of the United States and its allies.”

Noonan warns:

[T]his sounds like a veiled reference to the PAROS treaty (prevention of arms race in outer space) or–at the very least–a like-minded document. Because certain types of ballistic, air-launched, and ship-launched missiles can be modified to kill satellites, such a treaty would be devastating to the national security and military capabilities of the United States (and all but kill missile defense). THAAD interceptors, which meet their targets just outside the atmosphere, would almost certainly be banned by a PAROS style treaty. Like the START follow-on, we’d be doing most of the cutting, instead of powers like Russia and China–while entrusting our vast commercial and military space assets to the good faith of adversarial regimes.

Interestingly, this comes just as the THAAD (terminal high altitude area defense) system has delivered success after success. Its latest test hit a bullseye by killing a missile launched from a surface ship, as described by the Missile Defense Agency in a release today:

The Missile Defense Agency and U.S. Army soldiers of the 6th Air Defense Artillery Brigade from Fort Bliss, Texas, successfully conducted an intercept test for the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) missile defense element of the nation’s Ballistic Missile Defense System today. A target missile was launched at approximately 9:32 p.m. Hawaii time, June 28 (3:32 a.m. EDT, June 29), and about five minutes later a THAAD interceptor missile was launched from the Pacific Missile Range Facility (PMRF) off the island of Kauai, Hawaii. Preliminary indications are that planned flight test objectives were achieved.

The test involved the intercept of a short-range unitary target in the endoatmosphere (inside the earth’s atmosphere). The target, representing a short-range ballistic missile threat, was launched from an at-sea mobile launch platform located in the Pacific Ocean west of Hawaii. Upon acquiring and tracking the target, the THAAD system developed a fire control solution and launched an interceptor missile, which acquired and successfully intercepted the target missile. The intercept occurred at the lowest altitude to date for the THAAD interceptor missile, which has the capability to engage targets both inside and outside the earth’s atmosphere.

McKittrick at Closing Velocity, who has kept a close eye on missile-defense issues, translates this into plain English to make clear just how significant this test success is for national defense:

1.  It was a nighttime intercept, which has been touted by skeptics to be some sort of impossible challenge.

2.  The target SCUD was launched from the decommissioned USS Tripoli, mimicking the oft-referenced scenario of a sneaky, rust-bucket freighter lurking off the coast of a major city.

3.  The test incorporated other elements of our layered Ballistic Missile Defense System (BMDS), with a Patriot unit in Hawaii:

The PATRIOT system, located at PMRF, conducted engagement coordination with THAAD and conducted upper tier debris mitigation exercises during the intercept engagement.

4. The warfighters manning the THAAD unit had no warning and did not know when the “battle” would occur.

He also has the video:

Without a doubt, we need to defend ourselves against rogue regimes with ballistic-missile capabilities, such as Iran and North Korea.  Even if we could only hit land-based launches, we would be derelict in our duty to secure this nation if we did not develop a defense system when it can be reasonably expected to succeed.  This shows that we can target and hit an unannounced sea-based launch within a few minutes as well, making the system even more desirable.

We cannot give away this capability just to succor favor from Russia and China, not as long as we have to deal with Iran and North Korea.  If China wants us to end our missile defense systems, even in a mutually-verifiable manner, then it needs to exert its influence on both of those countries — which are both clients of Beijing — to end their dalliance with nuclear weapons, and preferably to end their tyrannies as well.  Until that happens, and until other belligerents eschew ballistic missile technology, the government has the duty to defend this nation against all threats, including and perhaps especially ballistic missiles.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Why not. Obama is about saving money!

Mr. Joe on June 29, 2010 at 3:22 PM

He’s serious about the deficit.

/

artist on June 29, 2010 at 3:22 PM

Better to spend it on stimulous!

Mr. Joe on June 29, 2010 at 3:22 PM

Because the NoKo’s will be stimied when they see all the new government workers in America.

Mr. Joe on June 29, 2010 at 3:23 PM

Feel safer with PBHO running the show?

I’m kicking myself for not digging the bunker deeper, but there is no way I’m tearing down all these blacklight posters and starting over.

Bishop on June 29, 2010 at 3:23 PM

Will Obama kill missile defense in new treaty?

please, nooooooooooooo!!!

but we are talking about dear leader here, even though we have spies here, he’ll go along eating his burgers and fries with russia…

cmsinaz on June 29, 2010 at 3:26 PM

if we changed the name to that of a Jim Croce song instead of calling it “THAAD” can we keep it?

ted c on June 29, 2010 at 3:27 PM

he continues with his hand out to our enemies….I feel SO much safer, don’t you?

cmsinaz on June 29, 2010 at 3:27 PM

ted c on June 29, 2010 at 3:27 PM

go for it

cmsinaz on June 29, 2010 at 3:28 PM

Of course he’ll kill it. He’s an enemy of the state. He, and his administration, are the single greatest threat to national security.

WashingtonsWake on June 29, 2010 at 3:28 PM

And Obooba says he has bad news for us next year?!

Akzed on June 29, 2010 at 3:28 PM

Until that happens, and until other belligerents eschew ballistic missile technology, the government has the duty to defend this nation against all threats, including and perhaps especially ballistic missiles.

Which means Obama is just not that interested…besides, we’re out of money and Obama can rescue us from bankruptcy just by cutting our defenses to zero.

AUINSC on June 29, 2010 at 3:28 PM

Wreck it, Obama!!! Wreck our country as fast as you can.

mobydutch on June 29, 2010 at 3:29 PM

Without a doubt, we need to defend ourselves against rogue regimes with ballistic-missile capabilities, such as Iran and North Korea.

Ummm didn’t the dis-arment of the Missile Defense system start almost a year ago?

upinak on June 29, 2010 at 3:29 PM

Killing success and security in one fell swoop.

pretty much sums up this administration…

cmsinaz on June 29, 2010 at 3:29 PM

We cannot give away this capability just to succor favor from Russia and China

Obama can and will do it. Why they even bothered to announce that they got the 11 spies…they could get anything they want from the suit without a man in it, gratis, at any point, just for the asking.

Schadenfreude on June 29, 2010 at 3:29 PM

I thought missile defense was killed already. Without the THAAD in Poland, we can’t intercept an ICBM from Iran.

year_of_the_dingo on June 29, 2010 at 3:29 PM

Old: Peace Through Strength

New: Peace Through Retreat

portlandon on June 29, 2010 at 3:30 PM

So, what exactly is he thinking? Can anyone tell me? He isn’t an idiot, he can plainly see the threat from nations like North Korea. So how does he justify an idea like this?

David Shane on June 29, 2010 at 3:30 PM

Can it be cut!!??

canopfor on June 29, 2010 at 3:30 PM

At what point does stripping the nation of its ability to defend itself become an impeachable offense?

NeighborhoodCatLady on June 29, 2010 at 3:30 PM

I supposed Obama apologized to the world for our techno-logic prowess as well. Hey Obama….EFF YOU!

search4truth on June 29, 2010 at 3:31 PM

At what point does stripping the nation of its ability to defend itself become an impeachable offense?

NeighborhoodCatLady on June 29, 2010 at 3:30 PM
With the current Congress–impeachment would be impossible.

mobydutch on June 29, 2010 at 3:32 PM

FAILURE TO PROTECT AMERICA!

IMPEACH!!

canopfor on June 29, 2010 at 3:32 PM

FAILURE TO PROTECT AMERICA!

IMPEACH!!

canopfor on June 29, 2010 at 3:32 PM
How canop, how?

mobydutch on June 29, 2010 at 3:33 PM

the government has the duty to defend this nation against all threats, including and perhaps especially ballistic missiles.

The government has the duty to defend Arizona and other states from an invasion from Mexico. It has the duty to protect the Gulf States from all that oil. It has the duty to uphold the rule-of-law. Etc., etc., etc. Barack Hussein Obama doesn’t believe in duty. Not to America anyway.

Tav on June 29, 2010 at 3:33 PM

We cannot give away this capability just to succor favor from Russia and China, not as long as we have to deal with Iran and North Korea.

Too late. Obama already hit the reset button at the burger summit.

Disturb the Universe on June 29, 2010 at 3:33 PM

Something about Enemy’s Foreign and Domestic come to mind … Gulf .. Israel.. Border.. Energy .. Eric Holder .. Blago .. Black Panthers …Accorn … Voter Fraud … Slush Funds ..SEIU .. Tax evasion.. ” Man O Man” …

wheels on June 29, 2010 at 3:34 PM

I blogged about this in Sep 17, 2009. The WSJ was the first to talk about this if I remember right.

upinak on June 29, 2010 at 3:34 PM

During the presidential campaign, Barack Obama promised to kill expensive missile-defense programs. John Noonan believes Obama may have fulfilled that promise in a pledge made yesterday that would “all but kill missile defense” systems that are proving successful.

who’s surprised? I’m not. He said he’d do it. Let those who voted for him for his articulatenes, and his hygiene be the first to occupy the Western Iranian Missile Test Range impact zone.

have at it folks…. *don’t look up*

ted c on June 29, 2010 at 3:34 PM

My goodness this country could be so darn well protected, could achieve unheard of greatness and what do we get for president, an unmitigated disaster beyond comprehension.

fourdeucer on June 29, 2010 at 3:34 PM

Ask the Russian spies if they think it’s a good idea.

Daggett on June 29, 2010 at 3:36 PM

F*ck this traitorous f*cking b@stard.

pseudonominus on June 29, 2010 at 3:36 PM

“Can’t I just eat my irradiated waffle?”

Bishop on June 29, 2010 at 3:37 PM

There are remedies for Barack H. Obama. They are prescribed in the Constitution. Why isn’t anyone discussing them? We have to start the drumbeat of impeachment.

BetseyRoss on June 29, 2010 at 3:37 PM

My alter ego McKittrick thanks you for the link, Ed!

Cuffy Meigs on June 29, 2010 at 3:38 PM

It’s part of his plan. He threatens us, the country and the world. Haven’t seen 1% of it, yet.

Schadenfreude on June 29, 2010 at 3:38 PM

So, what exactly is he thinking? Can anyone tell me? He isn’t an idiot, he can plainly see the threat from nations like North Korea. So how does he justify an idea like this?

David Shane on June 29, 2010 at 3:30 PM

I honestly think he believes the olive branch/White dove rhetoric of the far left. He is a true believer. An Idealist. How else do you explain his actions? His father hated America,and his father saw the British/Americans as imperialists of Kenya and other small 3rd world countries. Obama’s hatred of an America he sees as an “imperialist nation” supports the theory that he is still a little boy trying to earn a fathers love.

The other theory is that he is completely insane.

portlandon on June 29, 2010 at 3:38 PM

Isn’t the rule of thumb in war, take the high ground.
The high ground has the advantage…I think that applies to space and missiles.
My God, if he gave away what they are saying…and you know that the other gave nothing…
We truly have the dumbest, most naive president ever, ever…he is making Carter look like Churchill.

right2bright on June 29, 2010 at 3:38 PM

He’ll likely give the Military Transport contract to Russia, via EU, watch.

Schadenfreude on June 29, 2010 at 3:39 PM

There is a system,since 9/11,of reconfigured SSBN’s
that are operational,with SLBM’s that are carrying
conventional warheads that can flatten,an entire
countries Military in one shot!!!

Pray this doesn’t get mothballed!!
========================================================

Hypersonic Cruise Missile: America’s New Global Strike Weapon
—————————————

A tip sets the plan in motion–a whispered warning of a North Korean nuclear launch, or of a shipment of biotoxins bound for a Hezbollah stronghold in Lebanon. Word races through the American intelligence network until it reaches U.S. Strategic Command headquarters, the Pentagon and, eventually, the White House. In the Pacific, a nuclear-powered Ohio class submarine surfaces, ready for the president’s command to launch.
——————————–

When the order comes, the sub shoots a 65-ton Trident II ballistic missile into the sky. Within 2 minutes, the missile is traveling at more than 20,000 ft. per second. Up and over the oceans and out of the atmosphere it soars for thousands of miles. At the top of its parabola, hanging in space, the Trident’s four warheads separate and begin their screaming descent down toward the planet. Traveling as fast as 13,000 mph, the warheads are filled with scored tungsten rods with twice the strength of steel. Just above the target, the warheads detonate, showering the area with thousands of rods-each one up to 12 times as destructive as a .50-caliber bullet. Anything within 3000 sq. ft. of this whirling, metallic storm is obliterated.
—————————————–

If Pentagon strategists get their way, there will be no place on the planet to hide from such an assault. The plan is part of a program — in slow development since the 1990s, and now quickly coalescing in military circles — called Prompt Global Strike. It will begin with modified Tridents. But eventually, Prompt Global Strike could encompass new generations of aircraft and armaments five times faster than anything in the current American arsenal. One candidate: the X-51 hypersonic cruise missile, which is designed to hit Mach 5 — roughly 3600 mph. The goal, according to the U.S. Strategic Command’s deputy commander Lt. Gen. C. Robert Kehler, is “to strike virtually anywhere on the face of the Earth within 60 minutes.”

http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military/4203874

canopfor on June 29, 2010 at 3:39 PM

And just because THAAD fails to fail … No nation should have an advantage from Iranian nukes.

tarpon on June 29, 2010 at 3:40 PM

IMPEACH!!

canopfor on June 29, 2010 at 3:32 PM

I know what you are doing. Hurry up!!

mobydutch on June 29, 2010 at 3:41 PM

NEWSFLASH to all libs: Space has been “weaponized” since the first German V-2 exited the atmosphere on its way to London. Accept it.

Cuffy Meigs on June 29, 2010 at 3:41 PM

Damn. And here I thought today was the first day since he took office where he hadn’t done something reckless, dangerous, and destructive.

Buy Danish on June 29, 2010 at 3:42 PM

Our cancellation of missle defense in easter Europe has reaped many benefits in our relations with Russia. WAY TO GO TEAM OBAMA!!

tommer74 on June 29, 2010 at 3:43 PM

something reckless, dangerous, and destructive—-The president’s MOTTO.

mobydutch on June 29, 2010 at 3:44 PM

You actually need an answer to that question??

PatriotRider on June 29, 2010 at 3:45 PM

Yes we can!

MTF on June 29, 2010 at 3:46 PM

Obama can see weakness from his house.

portlandon on June 29, 2010 at 3:49 PM

Yes we can!

MTF on June 29, 2010 at 3:46 PM

That’s the correct answer. Now what’s the question?

Tommy_G on June 29, 2010 at 3:49 PM

Interestingly, this comes just as the THAAD (terminal high altitude area defense) system has delivered success after success.

Interesting? Isn’t this part and parcel of the Obama Policy: “The United States needs to be brought down a peg so that the other countries feel safer.”

Afterall, you can’t have the U.S. with a workable missile defense system. That would be unfair and destabilizing.

PackerBronco on June 29, 2010 at 3:50 PM

Obama is making the US look weak and that invites attacks not only on us, but our allies. You don’t keep thugish regimes in their place by playing nice with them, distancing yourself from allies, or giving away military advantages.

Obama is setting us up for a big conflict. If its not directly against us then one that we will have to get involved in to help out an ally.

tommer74 on June 29, 2010 at 3:51 PM

Obama is setting us up for a big conflict. If its not directly against us then one that we will have to get involved in to help out an ally.

tommer74 on June 29, 2010 at 3:51 PM
And guess who will be in charge when the bottom falls out?

mobydutch on June 29, 2010 at 3:54 PM

canopfor on June 29, 2010 at 3:32 PM
==================
How canop, how?

mobydutch on June 29, 2010 at 3:33 PM

mobydutch:I can not believe that Obama himself,can do this,
one-man can strip away America’s ultimate insuranc
e policies!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
=========================================================

Section 3 – Treason Note

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
==================================================

The United States Constitution

http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html#A2Sec4

canopfor on June 29, 2010 at 3:55 PM

BTW, a little gas for the fire…..check the red drudge headline…..

ted c on June 29, 2010 at 3:56 PM

BTW, a little gas for the fire…..check the red drudge headline…..

ted c on June 29, 2010 at 3:56 PM

In the words of Allah… OH SNAP!

upinak on June 29, 2010 at 3:57 PM

==================================================

The United States Constitution

http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html#A2Sec4

canopfor on June 29, 2010 at 3:55 PM
That works for me. Thanks.

mobydutch on June 29, 2010 at 3:57 PM

He has done or is doing everything he promised.

baldilocks on June 29, 2010 at 4:01 PM

canopfor on June 29, 2010 at 3:39 PM

Great capability, but launching a MIRVing SLBM has got to be the best way to cause mass panic and trigger Global Thermonuclear War (“the only winning move…). So in order to use it we’d have to notify every other nation with any sort of retaliatory capability, excluding the enemy of course. Then hope nobody tells the enemy. Unlikely.

Beagle on June 29, 2010 at 4:01 PM

I have bad news for you and I have worse news for you. Which do you want first.

chemman on June 29, 2010 at 4:04 PM

Section 3 – Treason Note

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
==================================================

The United States Constitution

http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html#A2Sec4

canopfor on June 29, 2010 at 3:55 PM
Do you think the Republican leadership has heard of Treason?

mobydutch on June 29, 2010 at 4:05 PM

The Leading Arabic International Daily
====================================================
His term in office also coincided with the approaching nuclear zero hour in Iran that forces him – more than any other of his predecessors – to take a fateful decision to confront or to appease Iran.

This will be the most serious decision that he will make since the decision made by former President John Kennedy in the Cuban missile crisis about half a century ago.

The broken oil pipe has become more dangerous to Obama than the Iranian nuclear reactors.

We do not know whether it is Obama’s domestic preoccupations or his excessively soft style of dealing with countries in the region that are behind his failures in our region.

His foes are many and they range from the American McChrystal, Britain’s BP, Israel’s Bibi [Netanyahu], Turkey’s Erdogan, and Iran’s Ahmadinejad.

If his comrades in the Democratic Party lose, this means that he will not be able to do much in the two years that will follow. Perhaps a Palestinian state will not be established, there will be no peace, Iraq may fall in the hands of the Iranians, and the terrorist organizations and extremist groups will raise the level of violence in our region

http://www.aawsat.com/english/news.asp?section=2&id=21437

canopfor on June 29, 2010 at 4:06 PM

Can we say that he hates America now?

jukin on June 29, 2010 at 4:07 PM

mobydutch on June 29, 2010 at 3:44 PM

“Something Wicked this Way Comes.” RB

chemman on June 29, 2010 at 4:07 PM

Something Wicked this Way Comes.” RB

chemman on June 29, 2010 at 4:07 PM
Sooooooo true.

mobydutch on June 29, 2010 at 4:10 PM

Can we say that he hates America now?

jukin on June 29, 2010 at 4:07 PM
Yes, he hates America and Americans.

mobydutch on June 29, 2010 at 4:11 PM

The United States Constitution

http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html#A2Sec4

canopfor on June 29, 2010 at 3:55 PM
==================================
Do you think the Republican leadership has heard of Treason?

mobydutch on June 29, 2010 at 4:05 PM

mobydutch: Lets hope so.I’m betting on SarahCuda to go ball
istic on HopeLess/ChangeLess!!!!!

I dunno,need to hear from H/A’s inhouse legal
scholars on the Constitution!!:)

canopfor on June 29, 2010 at 4:13 PM

So, what exactly is he thinking? Can anyone tell me? He isn’t an idiot, he can plainly see the threat from nations like North Korea. So how does he justify an idea like this?

David Shane on June 29, 2010 at 3:30 PM

Ever since he was hatched, he’s been taught-first by his mother, then by others-that America sucks.

Del Dolemonte on June 29, 2010 at 4:14 PM

Can we say that he hates America now?

jukin on June 29, 2010 at 4:07 PM
====================
Yes, he hates America and Americans.

mobydutch on June 29, 2010 at 4:11 PM

mobydutch I’m betting,Canadians too!!:)

canopfor on June 29, 2010 at 4:15 PM

Barack Obama, the most dangerous man in the United States.

milwife88 on June 29, 2010 at 4:15 PM

Barack Obama, the most dangerous man in the United States.

milwife88 on June 29, 2010 at 4:15 PM

milwife88: Maddening it is!!:)

canopfor on June 29, 2010 at 4:19 PM

Frank Marshall Davis taught young Barry well, didn’t he?

kingsjester on June 29, 2010 at 4:26 PM

We cannot give away this capability just to succor favor from Russia and China our political left

FIFY.

Kafir on June 29, 2010 at 4:28 PM

I’m laying odds it is the booze,cocaine and his Woodstock crew driving this train.

docflash on June 29, 2010 at 4:31 PM

Then hope nobody tells the enemy. Unlikely.

Beagle on June 29, 2010 at 4:01 PM

Beagle:Iran should worry,but then,theres Obama!!!!:)

canopfor on June 29, 2010 at 4:41 PM

hmmmm…. national security, or imagery I can exploit?… national security , or imagery I can exploit?….national security, or imagery I can exploit?….where did I put that two-headed nickel?

novaculus on June 29, 2010 at 4:47 PM

Frank Marshall Davis taught young Barry well, didn’t he?

kingsjester on June 29, 2010 at 4:26 PM

kingsjester:)
========================================================

The Obama File
Frank Marshall Davis

http://www.theobamafile.com/_associates/FrankMarshallDavis.htm
================================================

Obama File 37 Obama’s Mentor, Frank Marshall Davis- Was He Still a Communist?

http://newzeal.blogspot.com/2008/10/obama-file-37-overlap-obamas-mentor.html
==============================

Obama File 36 here

Obama File 36 How Socialist Was Obama’s “New Party”?

http://newzeal.blogspot.com/2008/10/obama-file-36-how-socialist-was-obamas.html

canopfor on June 29, 2010 at 4:54 PM

I’m starting to worry that the country as we know it won’t survive this presidency. Even two more years of it.

petefrt on June 29, 2010 at 5:00 PM

Yes, he hates America and Americans.

mobydutch on June 29, 2010 at 4:11 PM

mobydutch I’m betting,Canadians too!!:)

canopfor on June 29, 2010 at 4:15 PM
No doubt about it!!!!! Ha!!!

mobydutch on June 29, 2010 at 5:00 PM

Great read, for then and especially for now.

Americans, still celebrating and trying to resume the joys of a normal civilian life, were finding themselves increasingly caught up in a bewildering if not frightening new world they simply hadn’t seen coming. It wasn’t the peace they thought they had won.

Schadenfreude on June 29, 2010 at 5:02 PM

canopfor on June 29, 2010 at 4:54 PM

Thanks. I researched all about him from conservapedia.com for an article for my blog.

kingsjester on June 29, 2010 at 5:08 PM

NEWSFLASH

president barrak obama will receive the medal for couragous restraint with his most recent effort in decapitating the US technological advantage over barbaric regimes

I can see this punk looking like idi Amin with a chest full of worthless awards

Sonosam on June 29, 2010 at 5:41 PM

Have we ever seen Carter and Jug Ears together?

Is it possible that Jim is wearing a Barack suit?

Seriously….somebody should send Pres. Obortion the history of Carters’ administration.

Apologize to enemies: Check
Blame US citizens for poor fiscal policy: Check
Promise Utopia for the “oppressed”: Check
Fail utterly at delivering Utopia: Check
Suggest Jihadis have a legitimate gripe: Check
Cancel wizbang military programs: Check

Lose like no other sitting President ever has at re-election time: CHECK

BobMbx on June 29, 2010 at 5:42 PM

I’m starting to worry that the country as we know it won’t survive this presidency. Even two more years of it.

petefrt on June 29, 2010 at 5:00 PM

MREs and de-hydrated. Stock up.

BobMbx on June 29, 2010 at 5:44 PM

Treasonous!

kagai on June 29, 2010 at 5:59 PM

Well if the system works, Barry will have to kill it. Gotta maintain his winning ways.

GarandFan on June 29, 2010 at 6:02 PM

canopfor on June 29, 2010 at 4:54 PM
==============

Thanks. I researched all about him from conservapedia.com for an article for my blog.

kingsjester on June 29, 2010 at 5:08 PM

kingsjester:At your service,just in case you didn`t have
it,here is a motherlode one stop,of his Speechs,
not all tho,I think!!:)
===============================================

Barack Obama Speeches – 2002-2009

http://www.asksam.com/ebooks/obama-speeches/

canopfor on June 29, 2010 at 7:07 PM

He’s doing this to ensure that when the Iranian missiles hit, he can be playing golf (in an undisclosed location) in total confidence that all is well since he has international cooperation…

He will end up with a price on his head – hiding in an undisclosed location in Kenya one day.

Friendly21 on June 29, 2010 at 7:08 PM

canopfor on June 29, 2010 at 4:15 PM
=================
No doubt about it!!!!! Ha!!!

mobydutch on June 29, 2010 at 5:00 PM

mobydutch:)

canopfor on June 29, 2010 at 7:08 PM

Very Dangerous, Underestimating your enemies, especially Iran.

Rea1ityCheck on June 29, 2010 at 9:26 PM

Anything to weaken the USA.

Good job democrat voters…

Inanemergencydial on June 29, 2010 at 10:32 PM