Day 68: Why isn’t the A-Whale in the Gulf yet?

posted at 1:30 pm on June 27, 2010 by Ed Morrissey

The A-Whale bills itself as the largest open-water oil skimmer in the world, and it’s at least very impressive.  Originally an oil and ore tanker, the ship’s owners recently refitted the ship to do exactly the kind of work that the US so desperately needs in the Gulf of Mexico, and to do it on a vastly larger scale than current operations can handle.  According to the ship’s project manager, the entire American effort in 66 days has skimmed off 600,000 barrels of oil.  The ship’s owners claim that A-Whale can skim 500,000 barrels a day.

So where is the A-Whale now?  In the Gulf?  Not yet.  It’s on its way there after being tied to a dock in Norfolk, Virginia, and won’t be allowed to join the cleanup effort until the Coast Guard and the EPA figure out whether it meets their standards (h/t Deb Singer on Twitter):

After making a brief stop in Norfolk for refueling, U.S. Coast Guard inspections and an all-out publicity blitz intended to drum up public support, a giant tanker billed as the world’s largest oil skimming vessel set sail Friday for the Gulf of Mexico where it hopes to assist in the oil-cleanup effort.

The Taiwanese-owned, Liberian-flagged ship dubbed the “A Whale” stands 10 stories high, stretches 1,115 feet in length and has a nearly 200-foot beam. It displaces more water than an aircraft carrier. …

But a number of hurdles stand in his way. TMT officials said the company does not yet have government approval to assist in the cleanup or a contract with BP to perform the work.

That’s part of the reason the ship was tied to pier at the Virginia Port Authority‘s Norfolk International Terminals Friday morning. TMT and its public-relations agency invited scores of media, elected officials and maritime industry executives to an hour-long presentation about how the ship could provide an immediate boost to clean-up efforts in the Gulf.

TMT also paid to fly in Edward Overton, a professor emeritus of environmental sciences at Louisiana State University, to get a look at the massive skimmer.

Overton blasted BP and the federal government for a lack of effort and coordination in their dual oil-spill response and made a plea to the government to allow the A Whale to join the cleanup operation.

To be clear, the A-Whale has not yet been tested on the scale needed in this cleanup.  Limited testing, the ship’s owners say, have proven the concept of their new skimming technique.  They have already begun plans for a B-Whale to do the same work, but until someone gets the ship into the game, no one will know for certain whether it can operate at the full, advertised capacity.

However, the answer to that should be so what?  We badly need increased skimming capacity.  Even if this ship only ever gets one load of oil skimmed, that’s a potential 500,000 barrels of oil out of the Gulf, or an advance of 66 days at present rate.  While the Coast Guard needs to ensure seaworthiness, the EPA’s regulatory hurdles are in this case ridiculous.  We’re already in the worst-case scenario.  Even if the A-Whale doesn’t skim a single barrel of oil, they can hardly make the situation worse than it is right now.

This, by the way, is Day 68 of the Gulf crisis.  The A-Whale didn’t get refitted on Day 66; this work had to have been done over months, if not years.  Shouldn’t the government have known about the existence of this ship two months ago, and been working on certifying it immediately?    The A-Whale shouldn’t have had to stop at Norfolk at all to get the nation’s attention, but should have been hired to steam directly to the Gulf and get to work immediately. It’s indicative of a crisis management team that is spending more time worrying about regulations and red tape than cleaning up the mess, just as we saw with Packgen’s boom.

Update: The post was missing the link to the Daily Press.  I’ve fixed it now.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3

500,000 barrels of oil is alot of money. They’re probably worried about getting their hands on it.

OxyCon on June 27, 2010 at 2:46 PM

Start the criminal investigations and lock that band of evil Marxists up as soon as the Dems lose their majority. The nation’s survival is at stake here.

Ogabe on June 27, 2010 at 2:39 PM

Then start with George Soros. I’m convinced he’s the evil puppetmaster and The One doesn’t make a move without his input.

I bet the press is in Soro’s pocket as well – therefore keeping the news focused on Michael Jackson’s demise a year ago instead of the country’s demise under this administration.

/tinfoil hat off

tru2tx on June 27, 2010 at 2:48 PM

Well, now. They DO have to make sure it has fire extingushers and life jackets. That might take another month or two but hey, Obama is in charge of this effort and has been from day one. He said so, remember?

MikeA on June 27, 2010 at 2:49 PM

Listen they want to use this mess to implement their climate change crap. Is it any wonder the response has been terrible?
They count on America to believe their cries of “It is BP’s fault” or their famous “It is Bush’s fault”. Sorry but there are not too many reasonable explanations.

CWforFreedom on June 27, 2010 at 2:51 PM

“why does mommy cry herself to sleep, daddy?”

Electrongod on June 27, 2010 at 2:51 PM

Why can’t THIS be the test? God I hate bureaucrats!

SouthernGent on June 27, 2010 at 2:52 PM

can we get this whole impeachment process thing going now???

moonbatkiller on June 27, 2010 at 2:54 PM

I love the “to meet standards” excuse. Really? What is the ship gonna do thats worse? Crash and leak 100,000 Barrels of Oil a day?

I guess they mean “Meet the standards of our demands that they must hire union works and unionize the next ship building”

Rbastid on June 27, 2010 at 2:55 PM

Why can’t THIS be the test? God I hate bureaucrats!

SouthernGent on June 27, 2010 at 2:52 PM

I would luv for Oprah to ask The One to grade himself again.

Electrongod on June 27, 2010 at 2:55 PM

I don’t think THIS http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/13653 is what Rush menat when he said I hope he fails!

Maybe Rush will explain himself tomorrow!

Either Rushs’ or Bushs’ fault I’m sure!
s/

dhunter on June 27, 2010 at 2:55 PM

Libya going ahead with BP drilling deal

TRIPOLI, Libya — Libya will allow BP to begin drilling in its offshore deepwater region next month, despite the massive Gulf of Mexico oil spill, the head of Libya’s National Oil Co. said Sunday.

Shokri Ghanem, who serves as Libya’s de facto oil minister, said the April explosion of the Deepwater Horizon rig, and the subsequent spill, were “tragic,” but the oil industry is also moving into “new frontiers.”

“An accident will not stop us from digging in this new frontier,” Ghanem said. “Life must go on, but we will learn a lot of lessons.”

When a Libyan official makes more sense… oh never mind.

Drained Brain on June 27, 2010 at 2:56 PM

Electrongod on June 27, 2010 at 1:41 PM

Heh.

BallisticBob on June 27, 2010 at 2:59 PM

Drained Brain-

When do you or people in general drive better after a ticket/accident/near accident or when you have gone a while without one?

CWforFreedom on June 27, 2010 at 3:00 PM

Typical, moronic, bureaucratic, government idiots…. Odumbo should have cut through all this mess weeks ago. Shows what an empty suit liar he is….. How’s that hopenchange working for you, liberals? Elections have consequences…… idiots.

ultracon on June 27, 2010 at 3:00 PM

When a Libyan official makes more sense… oh never mind.

Drained Brain on June 27, 2010 at 2:56 PM

BP made ( =paid) the Brits to free a libyan terrorist, for this contract. Now its the libyan’s turn to honor their part of the deal.
BTW that terrorist is not dead yet.
NO blood for oil /

macncheez on June 27, 2010 at 3:04 PM

Honestly, just dump the beaureaucrats in the stinking gulf already.

reaganaut on June 27, 2010 at 2:28 PM

Why don’t they just go out there?

I mean, who in the hell is going to stop that big mofo?

BallisticBob on June 27, 2010 at 3:05 PM

D’oh!

cmsinaz on June 27, 2010 at 3:06 PM

When do you or people in general drive better after a ticket/accident/near accident or when you have gone a while without one?

CWforFreedom

The best time to eat at a restaurant is generally a month after they’ve been cited for the health code. Everything’s sparkling, the cooks know what they’re doing, and the food is the best it’ll ever be.

Jinxed on June 27, 2010 at 3:07 PM

From Day One, the protocols and procedures spelled out in the OPA should have been initiated since the spew is taking place in federal waters.

The Gulf States should be suing the federal government, its inept agencies, and its overseeing fool in the WH for dereliction of duty, if not criminal malfeasance and negligence.

The response to this crisis is an object-lesson in a government that is too big and that thus fails.

onlineanalyst on June 27, 2010 at 3:07 PM

From the initial description this ship is an old OBO (ore/bulk/oil) carrier pronounced oboe. They were considered to be great money making ships when initially built but provided to be not as sturdy as required and fell into disfavor 25 years ago even before the fall of the use of supertankers. The size given seems to be a little more than the standard lightering tankers used widely in late 70′s/early 80′s. Most tankers ARE larger than aircraft carrriers in displacement, that is NOT a wow factor to anyone in the shipping industry.

Kermit on June 27, 2010 at 3:14 PM

From the new link on Obama

Still, the White House feels it has momentum on its side, powered by legislative victories on health care and financial regulation — and the possibility of using the BP debacle to make it three-for-three on the big issues by passing energy legislation by year’s end

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0610/39055.html#ixzz0s59Z5iPQ

CWforFreedom on June 27, 2010 at 3:15 PM

Their going to put a bust of Obama on the bow, since oil can only go into A-Whale through the A-Hole.

J_Crater on June 27, 2010 at 3:16 PM

Jinxed – yep exactly

CWforFreedom on June 27, 2010 at 3:16 PM

“why does mommy cry herself to sleep, daddy?”

Electrongod on June 27, 2010 at 2:51 PM

…’Cause daddy is to flaccid to plug that hole.’

*giggles*

HornetSting on June 27, 2010 at 3:17 PM

The people at the top want this disaster to continue. It helps support their “oil is bad” and “cap’n'trade is good” propaganda. It also punishes Gulf states with Republican leadership.

n0doz on June 27, 2010 at 3:17 PM

Obama thinks he will gain by screwing this thing up.

CWforFreedom on June 27, 2010 at 3:17 PM

It looks like it may contain lead in the paint. Certain coatings on boats are toxic. I used tributyltin flouride antifouling paint on my yacht and switched to cuperous oxide. In a couple months, the Sierra Club will release a position paper on this.
The idiots in D.C. will block this.

seven on June 27, 2010 at 3:17 PM

that’s too…oops.

Tinfoil hats really not needed…Soros has his money in PetroBras…and they NEED platforms…..oil still gushing, ban still being appealed….you do the math.

HornetSting on June 27, 2010 at 3:19 PM

How far can we get this ship up the Potomac?

diogenes on June 27, 2010 at 3:19 PM

sure hope they have life jackets………

just sayin’……

RealMc on June 27, 2010 at 3:21 PM

As long as Obama keeps arms length distance from the cleanup he can keep blaming it on Bush and the media won’t call him on it. If he actually gets his butt in gear and starts real cleanup efforts, then he will be perceived as owning the mess.

pedestrian on June 27, 2010 at 3:30 PM

No doubt motivated by PROFIT, and totally on spec (without even any assurance they will be allowed to employ their vessel) entrepreneurial people (foreign devils, in this case) have spent fairly huge sums to invent, innovate, move, and out-fit a large tanker (re-cycling in the process on a massive scale) to come to the aid of our Gulf Coast. The vessel would be the largest of its kind in the Gulf, and capable of skimming 500 thousand bbls of oiled water a day. BUT…

Ragspierre on June 27, 2010 at 3:32 PM

OT Robert KKK Byrd seriously ill.

Would it be too crass to point out the irony in the possible death of a former KKK Democrat potentally stopping the Obama nightmare!

dhunter on June 27, 2010 at 3:34 PM

Lisa Jackson, Steven Chu (Nobel prize holder, BTW), and Janet Napolitano should be frogmarched to prison.
Did I miss anyone?
Dusty on June 27, 2010 at 2:07 PM

I think Jamie Gorelick is in there somewhere. She is usually involved in any massive bureaucratic screwup.

YehuditTX on June 27, 2010 at 3:36 PM

Did I miss anyone?
Dusty on June 27, 2010 at 2:07 PM

Oilybama!

dhunter on June 27, 2010 at 3:38 PM

We’re already in the worst-case scenario.

What I heard on the news is the real reason the Dutch or the Saudis or anybody else with a giant skimmer isn’t working in the Gulf is the liberal political organization known as the EPA won’t let them because even though they suck up a lot of oil and water and keep the oil, the water pumped back into the Gulf isn’t EPA standard quality.

Its only politics.

Speakup on June 27, 2010 at 3:41 PM

Its only politics.

I see it as enviro religious dogma. It is a sin to put water back into the Gulf that has any TAINT of oil, so all the oil stays right where it is.

It is irrational. It IS Obamanation.

Ragspierre on June 27, 2010 at 3:44 PM

Yet another “What if W had done this?”

Dingbat63 on June 27, 2010 at 3:45 PM

Well, now. They DO have to make sure it has fire extingushers and life jackets. That might take another month or two but hey, Obama is in charge of this effort and has been from day one. He said so, remember?

And also–according to J-No herself–”on top” of the situation right from the start. Whatever happened to Big Sis, anyway?

Owen Glendower on June 27, 2010 at 3:48 PM

the water pumped back into the Gulf isn’t EPA standard quality.

Speakup on June 27, 2010 at 3:41 PM

The oil skimmers emit too much carbon.

Somebody tried to stop the Boston Big-Dig the same way, by saying that the vents that pumped out the exhaust from all the cars in the tunnel didn’t pass air quality regulations for factories.

pedestrian on June 27, 2010 at 3:49 PM

, the water pumped back into the Gulf isn’t EPA standard quality.

Speakup on June 27, 2010 at 3:41 PM

Next, the EPA to outlaw the fire dept. using water to put out house fires in that the drain water going into the street’s storm drain doesn’t meet EPA clean water regulations.

Electrongod on June 27, 2010 at 3:56 PM

Is the USCG’s SNAFU of a response an institutional flaw or just a few dirt bags? Hope to hell it is just a few dipshits causing the issues and it isn’t systemic.

Nathan_OH on June 27, 2010 at 3:58 PM

Why? ObamAhole that’s why.

bloviator on June 27, 2010 at 4:00 PM

You know how stupid big government really is, even if the ship gets rid of 10% of the oil it cannot operate. If Jundal’s barriers kill 10% of the fish, the government had rather see the other 90% covered in oil before allowing the barriers to be built.

It’s called, pretty damn dumb, that how smart big government is. Just ask Chavez how his giant pile of crap paradise is working out.

Why does every one always think they are so smart … Hitler did the same crap to the Germans and look what happened to them.

Somewhere over 200 million died in the 20th century from these smart dumb-asses. If Obama was your answer, how stupid was your question.

tarpon on June 27, 2010 at 4:01 PM

Robert Redford to Obama on the spill:

“Grab this moment in history and get a decent energy policy… You can grab leadership and run with it.”

CWforFreedom on June 27, 2010 at 4:02 PM

Obama: Hey, that ships so big I bet you could have a nice putting green installed there.

Buy Danish on June 27, 2010 at 4:12 PM

If Obama was your answer, how stupid was your question.

tarpon on June 27, 2010 at 4:01 PM

That thar is one unbeatable bumper sticker.

betsyz on June 27, 2010 at 4:12 PM

Electrongod on June 27, 2010 at 3:56 PM

Let’s not give them any ideas.

chemman on June 27, 2010 at 4:19 PM

If Obama was your answer, how stupid was your question.

tarpon on June 27, 2010 at 4:01 PM

That thar is one unbeatable bumper sticker.

betsyz on June 27, 2010 at 4:12 PM

+++

the_nile on June 27, 2010 at 4:19 PM

Obama’s handling of the oil spill in the gulf…FUBAR.

scalleywag on June 27, 2010 at 4:21 PM

Why isn’t the A-Whale in the Gulf yet?

Never let a crisis get in the way of your golf game.

boomer on June 27, 2010 at 4:29 PM

I say sink it before it hits a baby seal in the head.

Limerick on June 27, 2010 at 4:38 PM

They count on America to believe their cries of “It is BP’s fault” or their famous “It is Bush’s fault”.

CWforFreedom on June 27, 2010 at 2:51 PM

‘Bush,’ ‘BP,’ hey, they both gotta ‘B’ – it’s good enough for government work.

TinMan13 on June 27, 2010 at 4:39 PM

We need a poll. Who will prevent the A-Whale from helping with the cleanup?
Obama
BP
Coast Guard
EPA
Dept of Interior

huckleberryfriend on June 27, 2010 at 1:38 PM

obama is not separate and distinct from any of the federal agencies you listed.

HE IS THEIR BOSS. THESE AGENCIES ARE SUBSUMED UNDER OBAMA’S AUTHORITY.
obama is first, last and completely responsible for all of the above listed, including directing BP when it comes to cleanup efforts.

Anyone, ANYONE, who blames the coast guard, EPA or any other execuive agency or agency flunkie, instead of the President of the United States, who is Constitutionally the head of the executive branch of which these agencies are a part, are continuing to buy obama time and cover by blaming the symptoms (the various executive agencies) instead of the actual disease (obama) for the ongoing sabotage of the the Gulf cleanup. He is derelict in his duty and criminally malicious in his negligence.

The statues and laws he has violated have become legion in number and yet….he continues to expect, and may well receive a reward of cap and tax and control of the oil industry as his reward for destroying the Gulf of Mexico.

What does it say about us that this is a distinct possibility? He has already bested us in taking over the banks, auto manufacturers and health care. That someone of his calibre has gotten away with this is disgusting.

INVESTIGATE, IMPEACH, IMPRISON!

tigerlily on June 27, 2010 at 4:40 PM

Excuse me. I don’t accept the premise.

This is a full-blown crisis with all the value attendant to that….destruction of the oil industry, punishment of red-state voters, demononization of private business, kowtowing to environmental nutjobs, opportunities for grandstanding and photo-ops, speech opportunities, $20 billion dollar slush funds, total dependence of the voters of Lousiana on the federal government, ability to smear the Brits on an hourly basis.

How is this ship going to improve the situation in any meaningful way.

notagool on June 27, 2010 at 4:43 PM

There’s nothing but criminals in charge of our government from the top down. Where are all the enviro whackos on this oil spill. The silence is deafening.

Kissmygrits on June 27, 2010 at 4:43 PM

Will the left’s rewriting of history ever end?

Sen. Sheldon claimed that the Dems ran Congress when Clinton’s 2nd term ended. I wonder if he knows that Mexico has a border with AZ. Dems are sure stoopid.

http://www.politifact.com/rhode-island/statements/2010/jun/25/sheldon-whitehouse/sen-whitehouse-forgets-which-party-controlled-cong/

CWforFreedom on June 27, 2010 at 4:45 PM

Where are all the enviro whackos on this oil spill.

making sure ships like this are not in use.

Wade on June 27, 2010 at 4:50 PM

The A-Whale shouldn’t have had to stop at Norfolk at all to get the nation’s attention, but should have been hired to steam directly to the Gulf and get to work immediately. It’s indicative of a crisis management team that is spending more time worrying about regulations and red tape than cleaning up the mess, just as we saw with Packgen’s boom.

maybe it was short a few lifevests….we can’t have it out there without those y’know. BTW, haven’t we been chided for all the criticism and been encouraged to help someone get in there and clean up some messes before?

ted c on June 27, 2010 at 4:54 PM

Where are all the enviro whackos on this oil spill. The silence is deafening.

Kissmygrits on June 27, 2010 at 4:43 PM

They are busy raising money for themselves :

GULF BENEFIT: Bay Area bands Careless Hearts and Tin Cat will play in a two-hour benefit concert Tuesday at San Jose’s Theatre on San Pedro Square.

Proceeds from “Stop the Gush” will support two groups: Global Green USA, which is documenting the impact of the Gulf of Mexico oil spill on the lives of Louisiana residents; and the Bay Area Climate Collaborative, which advocates for the use of renewable energy.

Tickets to the 7:30 p.m. show are $20 in advance or $25 at the door. Purchase them at http://www.brownpaper tickets.com/event/115473.

http://www.mercurynews.com/bay-area-news/ci_15380017?source=rss

macncheez on June 27, 2010 at 4:55 PM

…the liberal political organization known as the EPA won’t let them because even though they suck up a lot of oil and water and keep the oil, the water pumped back into the Gulf isn’t EPA standard quality.

Its only politics.

Speakup on June 27, 2010 at 3:41 PM

Well they’d better find a different argument because oil seeps into the oceans naturally:

OIL AND GAS SEEPAGE FROM OCEAN FLOOR REDUCED BY OIL PRODUCTION

November 18, 1999

(Santa Barbara, Calif.) Next time you step on a glob of tar on a beach in Santa Barbara County, you can thank the oil companies that it isn’t a bigger glob.

The same is true around the world, on other beaches where off-shore oil drilling occurs, say scientists, although Santa Barbara’s oil seeps are thought to be among the leakiest.

Natural seepage of hydrocarbons from the ocean floor in the northern Santa Barbara Channel has been significantly reduced by oil production, according to two recently published peer-reviewed articles, one in November’s Geology Magazine, the other in the Journal of Geophysical Research – Oceans.

tru2tx on June 27, 2010 at 4:56 PM

I can’t wait until these people are making my health care decisions. It will be such a relief to stop worrying about that stuff all by my incompetent, self-interested myself.

“drip, drip, drip” That is the sound of sarcasm dripping faster than oil spills into the sea.

stoutj734 on June 27, 2010 at 4:58 PM

And even though there are miles and years of red tape and destructive blockades that the various executive agencies are imposing on every aspect of the cleanup – these regulations/statues could now be and could have been waived on day one by obama in light of the urgent an emergent situation. And why isn’t obama skewered for refusing to waive the Jones Act, denying boom, sand berms and oil skimmers?

Is our government too big? yes. Too big to clean up the Gulf? No. Because the cleanup is only tangled in red tape because one person allows or has ordered it. The one who sits with his feet on the desk in Oval Office when he’s not on vacation or the golf course. Our “president” who could take just 30 seconds to sign one executive order that would waive all red tape and unleash the power of our nation to clean the Gulf.

He is derelict in his duty and criminal in his malicious neglect.

INVESTIGATE, IMPEACH, IMPRISON.

tigerlily on June 27, 2010 at 4:58 PM

I can’t believe this stuff with the Coast Guard and EPA.
I keep having visions of scenes from the Clint Eastwood movie, “Heartbreak Ridge
Yes, you must know the scene …

Colonel Meyers: What’s your assessment of this exercise?
Highway: It’s a cluster f*ck.
Colonel Meyers: Say again?
Highway: Marines are fighting men, sir. They shouldn’t be sitting around on their sorry asses filling out request forms for equipment they should already have.
Colonel Meyers: Interesting observation.

J_Crater on June 27, 2010 at 5:06 PM

It’s indicative of a crisis management team that is spending more time worrying about regulations and red tape than cleaning up the mess, just as we saw with Packgen’s boom.

It’s indicative of a crisis management team that is spending more time worrying about it’s own PR than in cleaning up the mess, just as we saw with Packgen’s boom.

FIFY

GarandFan on June 27, 2010 at 5:08 PM

Effing up the job from Day One.

BigAlSouth on June 27, 2010 at 5:19 PM

Only the idiotic imperial federal government would say that skimming up 100,000 gallons of oil mixed with water and then returning a small % of oil back would not meet EPA standards for discharge.

BierManVA on June 27, 2010 at 5:29 PM

Get the d#mn ship into the Gulf ………… now! Ed, is this the vessel that the Dutch offered within the first couple of days of the spill?

SC.Charlie on June 27, 2010 at 5:32 PM

Hmmm

Even if you factor in a ridiculous exaggeration by the ship’s owners it would still get *some* oil out of the Gulf.

Frankly there is little wonder that the Democrats want a stacked committee to “review” the escapades in the Gulf.

memomachine on June 27, 2010 at 5:41 PM

Why does the ship have to be certified? If it picks up oil, any oil, in any quantity, it *reduces* the amount of oil in the gulf. If the actual, measured oil in the discharge water is 1/4 of what was originally in the water, then it has reduced oil contamination by 75%. What’s wrong with that arithmetic?

Skandia Recluse on June 27, 2010 at 1:36 PM

It could be anything. It is because of anything. Anything that works to create as much delay and stall as possible.

Someone in the Obama Admin. could discover that, say, “all ships must be orange and black with yellow sails if they have sails or silent engines if they are diesel powered” or whatever.

The objective appears to have been and remain that stalls and delays are necessary to Obama’s objectives. He has never wanted the “hole plugged” nor wanted the oil disaster abated. If he HAD wanted either or both, he’d have been pursuing both or either…

The POINT is that excuses are easily located to draw out possible solutions to some distant point in time where they are as ineffective as possible with maximum damage in place.

Lourdes on June 27, 2010 at 5:43 PM

Get the d#mn ship into the Gulf ………… now! Ed, is this the vessel that the Dutch offered within the first couple of days of the spill?

I’m not Ed, but…NO…and the Dutch were not alone in the offers.

Ragspierre on June 27, 2010 at 5:43 PM

A couple of questions I have:

1. The Jones Act does not influence operations beyond 3 miles from shore, as I understand it. Why is that even an issue?

2. Vessels at sea, picking up “wild” oil, are not under EPA jurisdiction, as far as I know. This would fall under the admiralty law…the law of salvage. Under what authority could anyone stop them?

3. Why the hell doesn’t somebody seek an injunction against the EPA? Seems there are sensible judges on the Federal bench who would grant that in a heart-beat…

4. Why doesn’t somebody just go do this, and defy an effort to stop them?

Ragspierre on June 27, 2010 at 5:49 PM

I made a short video about A Whale http://bit.ly/chz6Re

debg on June 27, 2010 at 6:01 PM

I don’t really understand what the big deal is. Of course this ship SHOULD have been used early on, but that is just ONE MORE INTENTIONAL FAILURE on the part of “the administration”.

The point of criminal negligence was passed long ago.

CC

CapedConservative on June 27, 2010 at 6:03 PM

Lisa Jackson, Steven Chu (Nobel prize holder, BTW), and Janet Napolitano should be frogmarched to prison.

Did I miss anyone?

Dusty on June 27, 2010 at 2:07 PM

I think Jamie Gorelick is in there somewhere. She is usually involved in any massive bureaucratic screwup.

YehuditTX on June 27, 2010 at 3:36 PM

Believe it or not, Gorelick is involved with this story. As a lawyer for (gulp) BP.

Del Dolemonte on June 27, 2010 at 6:11 PM

O Leadership! Leadership! Wherefore art thou, Leadership?

MaiDee on June 27, 2010 at 6:15 PM

Sail the A Whale to the gulf, set anchor and give an approval deadline of oh let’s say July 4th. If no approval by then, goodbye.

diogenes on June 27, 2010 at 6:31 PM

I still say this whole thing could be resolved so easily. Just dump a few million barrels of vinegar into the gulf and offer free salads to all the tourists at the beach! Problem solved!

BadMojo on June 27, 2010 at 6:38 PM

All part of the strategy in Barry Soetoro’s War on Prosperity

phreshone on June 27, 2010 at 6:42 PM

This is what happens when the presidency is treated as an entry-level job.

AZCoyote on June 27, 2010 at 6:51 PM

I’m not Ed, but…NO…and the Dutch were not alone in the offers. – Ragspierre on June 27, 2010 at 5:43 PM

Thanks. Now, can anyone tell me why the media, MSM and the Internet, all over this story and the offer of the Dutch ship. I am just banging my head on my computer desk every time I think about all this!

SC.Charlie on June 27, 2010 at 7:09 PM

Remember the mighty moose song, from Lampoons, Vacation movie? Now sing this to that tune.

Who’s the most incompetent boob we knoooow. Obama IS!

I’d like to take this dictater wannabe, and trounce him out of the White House on his rear.

capejasmine on June 27, 2010 at 7:11 PM

Sail the A Whale to the gulf, set anchor and give an approval deadline of oh let’s say July 4th. If no approval by then, goodbye.

[diogenes on June 27, 2010 at 6:31 PM]

Aw, the heck with that. Have ‘em start skimming and have an armada of private ships, boats and dingies, with Jindal, Riley and Barbour in the lead ships standing on the bows, to surround it.

End the Blockade! Free the Gulf!

It would be great drama.

Dusty on June 27, 2010 at 7:11 PM

Just start with this – there is much more:
http://objectivistindividualist.blogspot.com/2010/06/soros-podesta-brothers-bp-petrobras-nbc.html

LarryG on June 27, 2010 at 7:14 PM

Sure wish my fellow H/A peeps would watch my video: A Whale http://bit.ly/chz6Re

debg on June 27, 2010 at 7:23 PM

great video debg….keep it moving

ted c on June 27, 2010 at 7:30 PM

It’s probably owned by Republicans.

I’m now convinced that the Obamistration has decided that this leak is needed to help pass its energy policies and is therefore dragging its feet on this. Why else would there be such feeble efforts to clean up this spill.

If it could be proven that this was intentional, it would be an impeachable offense. It goes way beyond politics.

flataffect on June 27, 2010 at 7:43 PM

2. Vessels at sea, picking up “wild” oil, are not under EPA jurisdiction, as far as I know. This would fall under the admiralty law…the law of salvage. Under what authority could anyone stop them?

Ragspierre on June 27, 2010 at 5:49 PM

Exclusive economic zone extends 200 miles, oil has economic value: Commerce Clause.

agmartin on June 27, 2010 at 7:51 PM

debg on June 27, 2010 at 7:23 PM

‘K, kuhl vid, dude…

but who says the they’re waiting on BP…?

Ragspierre on June 27, 2010 at 7:52 PM

Exclusive economic zone extends 200 miles, oil has economic value: Commerce Clause.

Umm…maybe…but you’d have to be MUCH more specific.

Admiralty is also constitutional, and salvage is very well defined law.

Also, when is crude oil a pollutant and hazard, and when it is, has its “economic value” ended? Whaddaya say…?

Ragspierre on June 27, 2010 at 7:55 PM

great video debg….keep it moving

ted c on June 27, 2010 at 7:30 PM

Moving it per ted c… http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MKLS_2KM0YY

debg on June 27, 2010 at 7:57 PM

Umm…maybe…but you’d have to be MUCH more specific.

Ragspierre on June 27, 2010 at 7:55 PM

Sorry was channeling Crr6 there.

agmartin on June 27, 2010 at 8:00 PM

If I were the owners I would set sail tomorrow for the Gulf say ……………….. here I am!!!!!!!!!!!!

SC.Charlie on June 27, 2010 at 8:08 PM

Sort of OT: waaaay creeeeepy pix of The One front and center of Drudge.

There’s evil in those eyes.

tru2tx on June 27, 2010 at 8:11 PM

Lawrence Solomom of Canada’s Financial Post has the chapter and verse of Obama’s gross negligence. It’s tragic that America’s MSM doesn’t have the balls to stand up to Obama.

http://www.financialpost.com/Avertible+catastrophe/3203808/story.html

Basilsbest on June 27, 2010 at 8:25 PM

No A-Whale = SMART POWER…

Khun Joe on June 27, 2010 at 8:26 PM

There’s evil in those eyes.

tru2tx on June 27, 2010 at 8:11 PM

There certainly is no soul behind them.

Inanemergencydial on June 27, 2010 at 8:38 PM

68 days…hah! It took Obama nearly 3 months to decide an the troop surge in Afghan last year.
I am sure he will get all the resources to the Gulf in another few weeks with plans for an exit strategy.

Electrongod on June 27, 2010 at 9:02 PM

According to the ship’s project manager, the entire American effort in 66 days has skimmed off 600,000 barrels of oil. The ship’s owners claim that A-Whale can skim 500,000 barrels a day.

This is misleading, Ed. Although the A-Whale vessel has the potential to skim 500,000 barrels of oil a day, in order to do so the oil would have to all be concentrated in a single spot on the water. Unfortunately, the oil slicks in the Gulf are spread out over hundreds of miles in small and discontinous patches. The A-Whale vessel, or any other, could never come close to getting at all of it in one day (maybe 1% at max if they could find a spot with heavy concentration). Skimming rates and vessel capacity are not the limiting factors in the response. The challenge is finding the oil on the water and then getting the skimming vessels or dispersents to it before it hits shore.

fed-nad on June 27, 2010 at 9:15 PM

Comment pages: 1 2 3