McCain: Replacing McChrystal is just half the job

posted at 2:20 pm on June 24, 2010 by Ed Morrissey

Senator John McCain gives Barack Obama good marks for taking command of a messy situation with General Stanley McChrystal and appointing General David Petraeus to replace him, but the job’s only half done, he tells ABC’s George Stephanopoulos. The problems in the Afghanistan effort did not begin and end with McChrystal, and Obama needs to show some command authority in the rest of the team. McCain doesn’t mention anyone by name, but he clearly wants to see Karl Eikenberry out of the embassy in Kabul and replaced with more of a team player:

A day after President Obama replaced the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan , Gen. StanleyMcChrystal, with Iraq War architect Gen. David Petraeus, Sen. John McCain urged the president not to stop there.

“It’s completely understandable why the president made the decision that he did, based on the civilian-military relationship that goes a long way back…” McCain said today on “Good Morning America.” “I also point out to the president, with my strong support of Petraeus, we also need a new team over there as well — perhaps at the embassy and other areas.”

Indeed.  If Obama wants a no-drama approach to the war, then Eikenberry has to go, too.  The American ambassador alienated both the American military leadership and the government in Kabul by publicly objecting to Hamid Karzai through leaked cables.  After that eruption, Karzai has relied on McChrystal and the American diplomatic team has been less than effectual.  If the White House has determined to work with Karzai as a partner, Eikenberry should have been relieved immediately.  Had Obama acted then, it’s possible (although by no means certain) that McChrystal might have learned a lesson and wouldn’t have necessitated a mid-surge replacement at the top.

McCain also emphasized his position that the eventual drawdown of troops had to be conditions-based, and wants Petraeus to underscore that in his new role:

Petraeus reaffirmed his support for the president’s strategy, including the withdrawal date Wednesday, but McCain implied Petraeus’ advice to the president could change as the withdrawal deadline looms closer.

“I believe Gen. Petraeus can do the job and I’m convinced Gen. Petraeus will say at the hearings that he will give his best advice to the president as to what the conditions are at the time, probably next year,” McCain said.

“You cannot tell the enemy when you’re leaving in warfare and expect your strategy to be able to prevail. That’s just a fundamental of warfare and I know it.”

Expect this point to be a major issue in Petraeus’ confirmation hearing.  It won’t slow down his confirmation, which will almost certainly be unanimous, but McCain and others will take this opportunity to scold Obama for announcing timetables as part of his surge.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

since when is mccain and expert?

and don’t tell me about his POW years—i’m sorry for that and i appreciate and love him for it, but he’s hardly a brilliant war strategist.

devadevadasa on June 24, 2010 at 2:23 PM

Replacing the CInC would be the most helpful move.

GnuBreed on June 24, 2010 at 2:24 PM

LOOK AT ME….LOOK AT ME!!!!!! I AM IMPORTANT! I AM RELEVENT! I’M ON T.V. EVERYDAY!

LOOK. AT. ME. !!!!!!11!!!eleventy!!!!!

ramrants on June 24, 2010 at 2:24 PM

look, im still convinced hayworth is 1000% better than this guy.

moonbatkiller on June 24, 2010 at 2:24 PM

since when is mccain and expert?

and don’t tell me about his POW years—i’m sorry for that and i appreciate and love him for it, but he’s hardly a brilliant war strategist.

devadevadasa on June 24, 2010 at 2:23 PM

Well, he was one of the few in Congress to be right about the surge in Iraq. He’s certainly more of an authority on the subject than Obama or “Bite Me”.

Doughboy on June 24, 2010 at 2:25 PM

Community organizer is so over his head…

d1carter on June 24, 2010 at 2:26 PM

McCain is saying all this for what reason again?

Johnnyreb on June 24, 2010 at 2:26 PM

The American ambassador alienated both the American military leadership and the government in Kabul by publicly objecting to Hamid Karzai through leaked cables.

Yeah, but someone in the general’s staff called the vice president “bite me”.

I think it’s clear that the “bite me” comment was much more damaging to the war effort!

forest on June 24, 2010 at 2:27 PM

“Bite Me”.

Doughboy on June 24, 2010 at 2:25 PM

I know it was insubordination and all that, but that’s one funny moniker for Mr. VP.

scalleywag on June 24, 2010 at 2:29 PM

And this afternoon McCains echo #1 Graham and this evening McCains echo #2 Lieberman will agree.

fourdeucer on June 24, 2010 at 2:30 PM

My goodness, something Sen. McCain and I agree on.

Cindy Munford on June 24, 2010 at 2:31 PM

John McCain is senile.

Tav on June 24, 2010 at 2:32 PM

McCain’s right on this one. Clean up the people problems and then allow the military to do it’s thing on it’s own terms.

jeanie on June 24, 2010 at 2:33 PM

The other half is accepting Obama’s resignation.

viking01 on June 24, 2010 at 2:34 PM

way to keep your powder dry Senator. You saved it for a day where the fight barely matters and it has become useless. So you get Eikenberry fired and score a point on the timelines…….big hairy deal! aren’t you glad you suspended your campaign so you could stick around to say that.?

ted c on June 24, 2010 at 2:34 PM

Well, he was one of the few in Congress to be right about the surge in Iraq. He’s certainly more of an authority on the subject than Obama or “Bite Me”.

Doughboy on June 24, 2010 at 2:25 PM

When we leave Iraq it will become even more of an ally of Iran than it is now.

Tav on June 24, 2010 at 2:34 PM

My goodness, something Sen. McCain and I agree on.

Cindy Munford on June 24, 2010 at 2:31 PM

Of course he is right and has been pretty good in military matters except closing Gitmo, enhanced interrogations and immigration.

fourdeucer on June 24, 2010 at 2:35 PM

The clusterfark in Afghanistan is making Vietnam look brilliant by contrast.

Tav on June 24, 2010 at 2:36 PM

You don’t think McCain is going to try and make a 3rd attempt at the Presidency, do you? He has been all over my tv for the past 9 months, at aleast. Why won’t he just go away?

ramrants on June 24, 2010 at 2:37 PM

You guys need to get over your MDS and appreciate it when McCain is right. I know if he had a better candidate going against him in AZ. you guys would probably back off a little but you’re showing your narrow mindedness.

Vince on June 24, 2010 at 2:37 PM

McCain: Replacing McChrystal is just half the job

The other half is replacing McCain…

PatriotRider on June 24, 2010 at 2:37 PM

fourdeucer on June 24, 2010 at 2:35 PM

You’re right, I was being flip. I would much prefer that he was CIC. I did what I could. Have you heard all the pundits calling him “brilliant” for the McChrystal decision? Obviously the talking points word of the day.

Cindy Munford on June 24, 2010 at 2:38 PM

The clusterfark in Afghanistan is making Vietnam look brilliant by contrast.

Tav on June 24, 2010 at 2:36 PM

Uh, no! Hell no!!!!

Vince on June 24, 2010 at 2:39 PM

since when is mccain and expert?

and don’t tell me about his POW years—i’m sorry for that and i appreciate and love him for it, but he’s hardly a brilliant war strategist.

devadevadasa on June 24, 2010 at 2:23 PM

Geee, I don’t know, maybe involved in the senate, and with the armed forces committee, and most every other armed forces institution, along with being involved in most every major Senate decisions that past 30 years, gives him an edge on most everyone else…just a guess.

Senator John McCain is Ranking Member of the Senate Committee on Armed Services;
Member of the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

right2bright on June 24, 2010 at 2:40 PM

What does all this mean?

It means that the American military, aided and abetted by narcissistic men like John McCain, is willingly sending warriors to die under absurd ROE and willing to fight, kill and die in a war the CINC demonstrably does not want to win, no longer is the defender of our republic of, by and for the people, but has devolved into a palace guard for whomever sits in the oval office.

Too bad. We once had men leading our soldiers. America didn’t sacrifice its youth to politics and to wars we neither believe in nor should be fighting.

And our generals once understood that.

KentAllard on June 24, 2010 at 2:41 PM

America didn’t sacrifice its youth to politics and to wars we neither believe in nor should be fighting.

And our generals once understood that.

KentAllard on June 24, 2010 at 2:41 PM

Since WWII?

Vince on June 24, 2010 at 2:43 PM

The entire COIN strategy is a fraud perpetuated on the American people. The idea that we are going to spend a trillion dollars to reshape the culture of the Islamic world is utter nonsense.
(Douglas Macgregor, retired colonel who went to West Point with McChrystal.

Tav on June 24, 2010 at 2:45 PM

Since WWII?

Vince on June 24, 2010 at 2:43 PM

Some have since WWII. Westmoreland, Petraeus and McChrystal are certainly not among them.

KentAllard on June 24, 2010 at 2:49 PM

Remember when Pres. Reagan built his cabinet? He asked the brightest and the best in their fields to take a pay cut and become public servants for the sake of the country. The Won built his on ideology. We probably need to be more thankful that is the sum total of their “talents”.

Cindy Munford on June 24, 2010 at 2:55 PM

time to get out of Afghanistan…. fish or cut bait… win or leave…

lm10001 on June 24, 2010 at 2:59 PM

Andy McCarthy: I got in some hot water here last year for arguing that Gen. McChrystal, for all his undeniable valor, is a progressive big-thinker who has been conducting a sociology experiment in Islamic nation-building. It’s a flawed experiment that assumes Afghan Muslims will side with us — i.e., the Westerners their clerical authorities tell them are infidel invaders and occupiers — against their fellow Afghan Muslims.

Nothing in the ensuing months changes my mind. To the contrary, what I’ve seen lately indicates that, while our troops are imperiled under strait-jacketing rules of engagement imposed by Gen. McChrystal to avoid offending Afghans, Christian missionaries have been suspended for preaching (proselytism for any belief-system other than Islam is illegal in Afghanistan). I’ve seen Asia News’s report that Afghan converts to Christianity have been sentenced to death for apostasy. All this, moreover, is happening under the new constitution we helped write, which (as the State Department bragged in 2004) enshrines sharia as Afghanistan’s fundamental law. That is, the Afghan Muslim population our troops are fighting and dying to protect has institutionalized the persecution of other populations (when the said Muslims are not otherwise busy killing each other).

In the Examiner, Byron points to Rolling Stone’s account of a frustrated American soldier, lamenting the death of a fellow soldier killed because of the rules of engagement. “You sit and ask yourself,” says the soldier, “What are we doing here?” I don’t know, but whatever it is, it is not what Americans thought they were sending our military to Afghanistan to do.

Tav on June 24, 2010 at 3:05 PM

Have you heard all the pundits calling him “brilliant” for the McChrystal decision? Obviously the talking points word of the day.

Cindy Munford on June 24, 2010 at 2:38 PM

..Once again showing how democrats lack any character and intelligence considering just a few years ago they were calling Petraeus a liar and a failure in front of this nation during wartime.

…..Now that they need him to save their butts politically….it’s a genius move to put him in charge.


……has Hillary,Reid,Obama,or any of their liberal support groups ever apologized to Petraeus for their slanderous comments???????

…… I don’t remember hearing any apologies…..

Baxter Greene on June 24, 2010 at 3:07 PM

what’s the line… “seems they’d rather be alive than free, poor dumb basterds”. As noble as it is, you can’t modernize people who like things just the way they are

lm10001 on June 24, 2010 at 3:09 PM

And Holebroke. For gawdssake don’t forget to fire Holebroke.

petefrt on June 24, 2010 at 3:10 PM

Dear gawd…the McCain-derangement rears it’s ugly head here again. OK, a lot of ya’s don’t like McCain. But instead of the usual “McCain stinks” comments, why not give him a little credit when what he says is absolutely right!

Is it really that hard to do?

JetBoy on June 24, 2010 at 3:10 PM

Hmmm…not too many comments.
Many HAers don’t want to acknowledge the fact that McCain is a foreign policy expert, a leader of the opposition, & a statesman.

itsnotaboutme on June 24, 2010 at 3:11 PM

Baxter Greene on June 24, 2010 at 3:07 PM

If he were shown the videos of his opinions as senator and now president, he wouldn’t even blush. None of them would. They are almost like the sociopaths shown on TV police dramas.

Cindy Munford on June 24, 2010 at 3:12 PM

McCain is a foreign policy expert, a leader of the opposition, & a statesman.

itsnotaboutme on June 24, 2010 at 3:11 PM

Zero for three is not very good.

Tav on June 24, 2010 at 3:14 PM

McCain: Replacing McChrystal is just half the job

But as Øbama sees it, the job has little to do with unifying the team and everything to do with restoring his own political optics.

petefrt on June 24, 2010 at 3:16 PM

Hmmm…not too many comments.

Many HAers don’t want to acknowledge the fact that McCain is a foreign policy expert, a leader of the opposition, & a statesman.

itsnotaboutme on June 24, 2010 at 3:11 PM

It’s downright sad.

JetBoy on June 24, 2010 at 3:18 PM

If he were shown the videos of his opinions as senator and now president, he wouldn’t even blush. None of them would. They are almost like the sociopaths shown on TV police dramas.

Cindy Munford on June 24, 2010 at 3:12 PM

…Exactly.

..I honestly don’t know what type of psychotic transformation someone has to go through to become so corrupt and narcissistic.

…..especially when that psychosis is directed at the American Soldier.

Baxter Greene on June 24, 2010 at 3:30 PM

Give McCain a break for cryin’ out loud. He was the only presidential hopeful that stood firmly behind the surge, and at the time was out on a limb.

John the Libertarian on June 24, 2010 at 3:33 PM

Tenacious Johnny MAC (R) the only Government Official who showed up on Imus In The Morning, broadcasting from the National Intrepid Center of Excellence -ribbon cutting today. A state of the art hospital built entirely private funds, for our wounded coming home with head trauma. Imus’s producers were trying to get Senator John F Kerry (D) to attend but his staff kept telling them he was too busy….

John McCain also addressed the Arizona Immigration Law.

Dr Evil on June 24, 2010 at 3:48 PM

Since it seems quite plausable that eikenberry was a detriment to the process, he should go too

the gen said a key to “coin” was that good guys at least have to be in the same sock

he felt eik created friction and would say I told you so after it failed

quite plausable

Sonosam on June 24, 2010 at 3:53 PM

Ok, Ok McCain was a horrible candidate, but he’s right here.The “Civilians” in charge in Afghanistan are undermining the whole operation,at the direction no doubt of Obama. They need to go(so does Obama but that’s just this old woman’s dream.)

sandee on June 24, 2010 at 3:59 PM

McCain on this one: right, right, right. Petraeus is superb, but he will only function as well as Obama allows him to.

J.E. Dyer on June 24, 2010 at 4:01 PM

Yeah, but someone in the general’s staff called the vice president “bite me”.

I think it’s clear that the “bite me” comment was much more damaging to the war effort!

forest on June 24, 2010 at 2:27 PM

That’s not what irked Barry. What sunk McChrystal were the comments about Barry being unprepared and looking intimidated by the military brass. The pencil-necked, narcissistic little creep undoubtedly was both intimidated and unprepared, but he’d never tolerate anybody pointing it out to his adoring cult followers.

As for McCain, he’s been deeply involved in military matters throughout his political career and was advocating for the Iraq surge when it was still a very unpopular idea (and one that was destined to fail, according to military geniuses like then-Senator Barry Hussein Obama). I’m not a big fan of McCain, but when he’s right, he’s right.

AZCoyote on June 24, 2010 at 4:05 PM

since when is mccain and expert?
and don’t tell me about his POW years—i’m sorry for that and i appreciate and love him for it, but he’s hardly a brilliant war strategist.
devadevadasa on June 24, 2010 at 2:23 PM

I know McCain is hated here at Hotair, but he’s frequently right about military matters (except perhaps when it comes to “torture”, but given his life experiences, that’s rather understandable).

He fought a somewhat lonely battle in favor of the Iraq surge, which I will always give him thanks for. He knows very well that timetables undermine the war effort. You know who doesn’t know that lesson? Obama. Obama was dead wrong about the surge, something he has never admitted, and he’s making the same sort of cut-and-run folly as he did a short while back.

Vyce on June 24, 2010 at 4:08 PM

I will always give McCain credit for his support of the surge, and his service to our country. I agree with him on this issue, too. I just wish I could see eye-to-eye with him on so many other major issues.

DrAllecon on June 24, 2010 at 4:48 PM

I don’t remember hearing any apologies…..

Baxter Greene on June 24, 2010 at 3:07 PM

Cause there weren’t any.

They are almost like the sociopaths shown on TV police dramas.

Fixed.

Eren on June 24, 2010 at 5:07 PM

Hey, John, there’s one more roach you missed.

Caststeel on June 24, 2010 at 5:52 PM

McCain has lots of faults but on military matters he is usually “right on”. No general, however brilliant can win this was without a free hand. That would include major changes in the ROI and the end of Washington inference.

duff65 on June 24, 2010 at 6:22 PM

When will this tired old RINO just fade away……?

Tim_CA on June 24, 2010 at 11:25 PM