Blagojevich aide: Obama knew we wanted to make a deal on the Senate appointment

posted at 4:57 pm on June 24, 2010 by Allahpundit

Question one: Would it matter if he did know? Question two: Between this and l’affaire Sestak, is there anyone in America at this point who can coherently explain the difference between legal and illegal horse-trading?

John Harris, Blagojevich’s former chief of staff, testified Wednesday in the former governor’s corruption trial that three days after the Nov. 4, 2008, presidential election, the ex-governor told Harris he felt confident Obama knew he wanted to swap perks.

“The president understands that the governor would be willing to make the appointment of Valerie Jarrett as long as he gets what he’s asked for. . . . The governor gets the Cabinet appointment he’s asked for,” Harris said, explaining a recorded call…

Defense lawyers say Harris’ testimony contradicts the government’s previous public statements that Obama knew nothing about deal-making involving the Senate seat appointment.

The defense on Wednesday moved to force the prosecution to turn over FBI reports of Obama’s interview with federal agents in December of 2008.
Obama is not accused of wrongdoing.

Not the first time Team Blago’s claimed contact between them and Obama about the Senate seat. Remember in April when they tried to subpoena him? They alleged at the time that he told them, via a labor-crony intermediary, that he wanted Valerie Jarrett to get the seat; now they’re insisting that he also knew they wanted something in return. Let’s say, for argument’s sake, that they’re telling the truth. What law has he broken by keeping his mouth shut about their proposal? Could it be the federal “quid pro quo” statute that’s causing him so many headaches vis-a-vis Sestak? Nope: No one’s claiming that Obama actually offered Blago anything to name Jarrett, so there’s no quid pro quo. In fact, here’s a moment of drama from today’s trial:

Blagojevich became bitter when told that the newly elected president would give him thanks – but nothing else – in return for naming Jarrett to the Senate, according to an FBI tape played Thursday at the former governor’s corruption trial.

With Harris on the stand, prosecutors played an FBI tape on which Harris is heard telling Blagojevich that the Obama camp has sent word that it would be “thankful and appreciative” if Jarrett were appointed to the Senate seat…

“They’re not willing to give me anything but appreciation,” Blagojevich is heard saying glumly on tape. Jurors also heard his voice as he punctuated his remark, “(Expletive) them.”

What about the federal “misprision of felony” statute, which makes it a crime to fail to report a felony of which you have personal knowledge? Nope again: Apparently, it’s only illegal if you help “actively conceal” the crime. Simply knowing about it and keeping your mouth shut doesn’t cut the mustard.

But who cares? The point here isn’t to indict The One, merely to further the meme that the Most Transparent Administration Ever is sufficiently comfortable with backroom deals that they’re not only willing to bribe Joe Sestak, they’re actually willing to look the other way when America’s sleaziest governor tries to extort them in exchange for a Senate appointment. A few more weeks of Blago trial headlines in this vein will help. Subpoena Rahm!

Update: The other point to remember here, which is probably most damning to the White House, is that their own internal review in December 2008 concluded that Emanuel was the only insider who had direct contact with Team Blago. That appears to be technically true but effectively a lie given the allegations that The One himself was relaying messages to them via an intermediary. That’s “transparency” the Chicago way.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

And the media will say “move on” and why not? They are all interconnected by marriage, by being former party officials, by birth and by ideology. Political Paunch saw nothing wrong with the Sestak affair (daddy contributes a lot don’tcha know)and he is the one people seesm to think will break ranks. We need to hold the media accountable as that’s the same thing as holding the powers that be accountable. They are all part of the same game, there is no quest for truth in the MSM.

clnurnberg on June 24, 2010 at 6:25 PM

Key West Reader on June 24, 2010 at 6:12 PM

Meaning Zero’s cut of the action, of course, not a panel. I’m certain Eric Holder is working overtime looking for any possibilities to impede or destroy any evidence linking Zero in on the senate seat auction. Some threats here, knock a few heads there. If Holder’s mentor Reno could get away with an entire massacre he’s probably itching to make his mark.

viking01 on June 24, 2010 at 6:33 PM

The most telling statement by Blago was “Obama wants to get away from Illinois politics”. Blago is saying Obama is used to dealing in Chicago and has practiced the art of corruption himself.

Herb on June 24, 2010 at 7:25 PM

Trying not to be transparent but being very blatant about political business does not look pretty.

Kissmygrits on June 24, 2010 at 7:49 PM

and America will be forever grateful for removing the worst elected president ever! I even see a Pulitzer prize of some kind or an academy award coming their way! Sure would be better than 85 yrs. in jail! Sing, Blago, Sing!

+13trillion, poetic and historical justice combined.

Or would it be “social justice”? Yes, it would!

Who is John Galt on June 24, 2010 at 8:41 PM

Kidda gives new meaning to ;

Stop the dam leak!

Go Blago!
Yes you can!
Isn’t that Fitzpatrick dude involved?
If he can send Scotter Libby to jail for forgetting something he said about a couple of liars then the fool better be after the Chitown Pinnochio for hard time for selling a seat and lyin to the FBI about it.

dhunter on June 24, 2010 at 9:34 PM

Any chance this could now be considered to be an impeachable offense?

pilamaye on June 24, 2010 at 9:40 PM

Yes you can Blago!
You have a right to face your accusers in court or call anyone in your defense!
Subpoena Pinnochio!
Blago do it dude!
Get that liar on the stand.
He can’t tell the truth for two seconds!
I got some questions for Pinnochio:

Whose your daddy?
Wheres’ your Birth Certificate?
Whose your daddy?
How’s come you listed foreign student on your college application getting aid to foreign students and
Whose your daddy?

dhunter on June 24, 2010 at 9:48 PM

Where is that car window paint?

“Blago,keep singing baby!”

Coastal Paradise on June 24, 2010 at 10:30 PM

The CEO’s of the MSM need to be held accountable come judgement day along with their whoring staffs and talking heads…..

POP POP FIZZ FIZZ……tiss just a silly jingle

dmann on June 24, 2010 at 10:39 PM

Blago “suicide” in 5…4…3..2…

Who is John Galt on June 24, 2010 at 10:40 PM

Who is John Galt on June 24, 2010 at 10:40 PM

Bingo!

dmann on June 24, 2010 at 10:46 PM

Comment pages: 1 2