New-home sales “collapse” in May
posted at 11:36 am on June 23, 2010 by Ed Morrissey
I was born in 1963, a year in which the US sold 300,000 new homes. Forty-six years later, we may be back to the same pace, thanks to ill-advised government intervention that sapped the demand for new homes. The annualized rate of new-home sales fell to a 46-year low in May, which had a 33% drop from April’s figures:
Sales of new homes collapsed in May, sinking 33 percent to the lowest level on record as potential buyers stopped shopping for homes once they could no longer receive government tax credits.
The bleak report from the Commerce Department is the first sign of how the end of federal tax credits could weigh on the nation’s housing market.
The credits expired April 30. That’s when a new-home buyer would have had to sign a contract to qualify.
“We fear that the appetite to buy a home has disappeared alongside the tax credit,” Paul Dales, U.S. economist with Capital Economics,” wrote in a note. “After all, unemployment remains high, job security is low and credit conditions are tight.”
That has been the problem all along. While the government offered tax credits to stimulate demand, it did little to create qualified buyers. By taking on boatloads of debt to chase pork-laden “stimulus” spending and send signal after signal of higher costs and more mandates on business, the Obama administration kept capital on the sidelines or looking for greener pastures overseas. High unemployment and tightening credit meant fewer buyers for the short- and medium-term.
Instead of allowing that demand to unfold naturally over the course of 2009-10, the Obama administration and Congress decided on two short-term stimuli in the form of tax credits on home purchases. Unfortunately, the $8000 credit made very little difference in whether a buyer was qualified or not, but it did provide a mighty incentive for those who would have bought anyway to accelerate their purchases. Just as with Cash for Clunkers, the American taxpayer ended up subsidizing sales that would have taken place anyway, only for the short-term impact that momentarily brighter news gave to an administration in way over its head on economics.
Analysts declared themselves “startled”:
“We all knew there would be a housing hangover from the expiration of the tax credit,” wrote Mike Larson, real estate and interest rate analyst at Weiss Research. “But this decline takes your breath away.”
Economists surveyed by Thomson Reuters had expected a May sales pace of 410,000. April’s sales pace was revised downward to 446,000.
Why would it take anyone’s breath away? Mortgage applications fell by over 40% in May. A 33% drop in sales is actually slightly better than what that data would predict. The difference may be that more people leaned towards new homes rather than resales, or that cash buyers are more of the market than normal, which would make some sense.
The smoke-and-mirrors economic policies of this administration have been thoroughly exposed. This is a disgrace, and taxpayers should be demanding to know why Obama and his team have sunk us deeper into debt without producing any real economic gains.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Unexpected?
Oil Can on June 23, 2010 at 11:38 AM
Obama todo list #5: Destroy America… check
Daggett on June 23, 2010 at 11:40 AM
“Recovery Summer”
Skywise on June 23, 2010 at 11:41 AM
What they should do to combat this is raise taxes.
Monkeytoe on June 23, 2010 at 11:42 AM
is this a “Cash for Clunkers” crib-style? All of the new homes that would’ve been purchased over the next few months were purchased ahead of time–leaving a big vacuum in the wake of it.
ted c on June 23, 2010 at 11:42 AM
I’m an Architect.
So, here’s a question: I’ve had nothing to do with the “unexpected” flat-lining of the recoverless housing market. My ability to perform my job, save for my future, and even feed my family has been directly affected by someone’s “cutting corners” or “unsafe practices” at an “unregulated” institution -namely Freddie and Fannie. Is there a $20B fund established somewhere for Architects? Barry? Anyone?
Oh. And do these folks not read HotAir?
BKeyser on June 23, 2010 at 11:43 AM
Wonder where Barney Fwank can say schnitzengruben.
lm10001 on June 23, 2010 at 11:43 AM
Another Obama scheme gone bad. Meanwhile, foreclosures will continue to mount as more buyers just walk away. Once he removes the mortgage interest deduction next year, the real estate market is done and over.
Key West Reader on June 23, 2010 at 11:45 AM
There are depressing graphs from the Department of Labor here. Couple that with the fact that our Congressional Democrat rulers don’t feel bound by the president’s promises, we’re in for an interesting ride.
Drained Brain on June 23, 2010 at 11:45 AM
Do you really think so? My guess would be that most of the public would think the tax credit should be put back into place.
Cindy Munford on June 23, 2010 at 11:46 AM
Obama was having such a good week otherwise.
Chuck Schick on June 23, 2010 at 11:47 AM
Obama is like the man who beats his wife then salves her wounds saying she can trust only him.
Paul-Cincy on June 23, 2010 at 11:48 AM
Barry is just so stimulating. From housing to jobs and from new business development to consumer confidence, Barry and his gaggle are eagerly stimulating one economic disaster after another. He’s the master of creating all time lows and biggest drops.
anXdem on June 23, 2010 at 11:48 AM
Well he ain’t sayin’ it in Lili Von Shtupp’s dressing room …..
Jerome Horwitz on June 23, 2010 at 11:49 AM
I’m not a historian, so could some professionals on board help me out?
What typically happens when a utopian architecture doesn’t pan out the way the dictator promised it would?
What is the dictator’s next move, in other words?
Does he typically act rationally and change course?
jeff_from_mpls on June 23, 2010 at 11:50 AM
this will end badly because the Obama admin acted stupidily.
I give them a good solid B+
unseen on June 23, 2010 at 11:50 AM
The Obama administration really expected this would at least mitigate the damage until the November elections were over. A big Oops!
Johnnyreb on June 23, 2010 at 11:50 AM
Well duh, obviously the government needs to extend the tax credit indefinitely. Or perhaps fund Fannie and Freddie in a different manner that offers considerable rebates to anyone that applies for a mortgage.
ButterflyDragon on June 23, 2010 at 11:51 AM
I lost my consulting job with a major mortgage lender last week. Just two months ago they called me and were excited that their Board had just approved a growth plan to make them a top-5 lender, and they were weeks away from establishing a fulltime position for me. But their business was off over 50% in the first quarter from 1Q last year and now they are cutting everything. I have few prospects and am now considering government employment, as much as that would pain me. It’s the only sector that is hiring right now.
Thanks, Democrats! >:_(
rockmom on June 23, 2010 at 11:52 AM
Our young, inexperienced, and economically illiterate president strikes again.
jukin on June 23, 2010 at 11:52 AM
But his golf game improved in May
faraway on June 23, 2010 at 11:52 AM
AMERICA WINS!
WE ADVANCE!
CPT. Charles on June 23, 2010 at 11:53 AM
There’s a G-20 meeting this weekend in Toronto. Merkle has made clear her disdain for BO. He isn’t one of Sarkozy’s favorites, either. It will be interesting to see if there are any reports of them ignoring him. I’m assuming he will attend if he’s not busy plugging holes on a golf course.
Cody1991 on June 23, 2010 at 11:53 AM
A recoveryless recovery
clnurnberg on June 23, 2010 at 11:54 AM
Dude for the love of God…
ITS!!! ON!!!! PURPOSE!!!!
rollthedice on June 23, 2010 at 11:54 AM
I knew from the day Obama was elected that the economy would tank. And I knew that the media would always find SOME aspect of the economy each month that didn’t look so bad and trumpet it as a sign of “recovery.”
What I didn’t anticipate was how overtly Obama himself would juggle the books to generate a fake blip on America’s EKG every once in a while that the liberal media could spend the next four months trumpeting, while they ignored the steady “Bush-caused” decline in every other aspect of the economy.
The American media have finally crossed that thin dividing line between genteel liberal bias and full-blown Soviet-style government-controlled propaganda machine.
logis on June 23, 2010 at 11:54 AM
Yeah , he really hits it out of the park..
the_nile on June 23, 2010 at 11:56 AM
Sorry to hear that. I remember that it was not long ago that you found that job. Maybe I’ve confused you with someone else.
At least you live in an area where there is the possibility of government employment. There is absolutely nothing where I live, government or private.
Cody1991 on June 23, 2010 at 11:57 AM
rockmom
Go for the government job. Then be disruptive. Question authority, engage in patriotic dissent. Question with boldness, hammer on the anvil of truth.
Use their own rules against them.
Get some payback.
Skandia Recluse on June 23, 2010 at 11:58 AM
Also wait until the Lame Duck congress in Nov takes away/reduces the mortgage interest tax deduction. Then see what happens with the debt causes a dollar collapse and we have 10%-15% mortgage rates.
Oil Can on June 23, 2010 at 11:58 AM
I am already anticipating that, along with the expiration of the Bush tax cuts. Just a ballpark figure, but I estimate the wife and I will be paying an extra $7,500-8,000 in Fed taxes alone next year. And we ain’t even close to being rich.
Johnnyreb on June 23, 2010 at 12:02 PM
Unexpectedly?
dczombie on June 23, 2010 at 12:02 PM
Guess this means we can expect the Democrats to announce……..A NEW STIMULUS IS NEEDED!!!!!
pilamaye on June 23, 2010 at 12:03 PM
US 1, FIFA 0
angryed on June 23, 2010 at 12:03 PM
If Obama were CEO of America Inc., he would have had his worthless butt fired months ago.
All the charts point towards downward trends and stockholders don’t give a damn about what the last CEO did, they want to hear how you’re going to make it right and the future.
NoDonkey on June 23, 2010 at 12:05 PM
I need to go GOLFING to think about this….
SDarchitect on June 23, 2010 at 12:05 PM
Free houses for everybody that doesn’t have one! We’ll pay for it after 2012.
neobadger on June 23, 2010 at 12:05 PM
What typically happens when a utopian architecture doesn’t pan out the way the dictator promised it would?
What is the dictator’s next move, in other words?
Does he typically act rationally and change course?
jeff_from_mpls on June 23, 2010 at 11:50 AM
usally one of two things. they start a internal or external war. In most cases its both. As chevez is doing now. he is at war with business and property owners. (they are Chevez’s jews) He is also flexing his muscles with Columbia.
Hitler went to war with the Jews and blamed them for the poor economy. when that didn’t work he launched war world 2. Stalin purged his country of tens of millions when that didn’t work he launched wars into Poland and surounding countries.
unseen on June 23, 2010 at 12:05 PM
That would be a good thing. There is no need to subsidize people buying houses via a tax break.
Besides the tax break you get just gets added to the cost of the house in the long run. If the govt gives you $x in terms of a tax break, the house you buy will cost $x more. The only people who benefit are those who make money from selling houses. To the consumer it’s a wash.
angryed on June 23, 2010 at 12:06 PM
Time after time, Øbama‘s meddling in markets backfires.
Art Laffer is right in “Tax Hikes and the 2011 Economic Collapse” The next one will be the biggie.
petefrt on June 23, 2010 at 12:07 PM
Sorry to hear that. It’s worse here in FL–very hard to get a mortgage for condos etc. So I can see the industry is in trouble.
TimTebowSavesAmerica on June 23, 2010 at 12:08 PM
Soooo….
The “ones-who-are-smarter-than-you” in Washington created a plan to bribe people to buy homes…thinking that this would increase home sales.
But then the plan to bribe homebuyers ended…and the same “ones-who-are-smarter-than-you” in Washington are surprised that home sales dropped??
Question:
Are the “ones-who-are-smarter-than-you” actually just posers who have no clue?
Or have they all contracted severe Alzheimers which has robbed them of both judgement and short-term memory??
landlines on June 23, 2010 at 12:09 PM
I’m sure that President Short Pants will make this his top priority between the back 9 and and club house.
ajacksonian on June 23, 2010 at 12:12 PM
Feel sorry for the people like the architect on this thread, but at the same time would like this to housing prices to remain low, so that I can purchase a Condo in Chi-town when I get out of grad school. (Hopefully if I can get a job that actually pays (or anyone that doesn’t involve serving coffee)… which is fingers crossed due to Barry and my moronic MBA program’s slacker career services department (so glad that I’m paying those bozos for help)).
Illinidiva on June 23, 2010 at 12:12 PM
I am a land surveyor and our business has been hit hard. The real estate market is dead, and it looks like it’ll be 2.5 years minimum before it looks like it will pick up again. If you find that $20B fund, please let me know so I can get in line.
txsurveyor on June 23, 2010 at 12:14 PM
And any architect worth his salt should be proposing a new Welthauptstadt to Obama! He is so in need of an Albert Speer type, no?
ajacksonian on June 23, 2010 at 12:14 PM
Wait until the analysts see the result of the Bush tax cut expiration.
bloviator on June 23, 2010 at 12:19 PM
The hits just keep on coming…
WisCon on June 23, 2010 at 12:22 PM
..What happened to all the “adults” that were supposed to take charge?????
Baxter Greene on June 23, 2010 at 12:24 PM
The curious thing is that every single economic policy of this administration has “unexpected” consequences. None of the policy results are unexpected. When taxes raise, or credits sunset, people adjust their behavior accordingly. How “unexpected” is that? Congress should just stop using tax policy to influence behavior.
EliTheBean on June 23, 2010 at 12:24 PM
Which means it’s actually much worse than in 1963, a year in which the US population was around 2/3rds what it is now.
FloatingRock on June 23, 2010 at 12:26 PM
The original tax credit was too small and too short lived to have an effect of jump starting the real estate market. We need to give everyone $25,000 to buy a house for the next 5 years.
/Krugmann
Ted Torgerson on June 23, 2010 at 12:27 PM
Reading the comments here illustrates how all the little tendrils interact and move through our society. How everything is interrelated. When one segment is affected everything else reacts to it sometimes in unexpected (that word again) ways.
Oldnuke on June 23, 2010 at 12:32 PM
When population increase is factored the 1963 level of new home sales applied to present day would be about 50% higher than current figures.
FloatingRock on June 23, 2010 at 12:34 PM
test
Cody1991 on June 23, 2010 at 12:40 PM
Dear Paul:
I eagerly await your check.
PackerBronco on June 23, 2010 at 12:41 PM
Hey, it could have been worse. At lest they didn’t require an old home to be destroyed to receive the credit.
agmartin on June 23, 2010 at 12:57 PM
The housing crisis is at the core of the recession. I’m curious, Ed, what would you have the administration do? Do you think the government should sit back and watch this mess unfold and do nothing? If a Republican was sitting in the White House, is that what you would recommend? ~ Halli Casser-Jayne
The CJ Political Report on June 23, 2010 at 1:05 PM
“I love it when a plan comes together”
BHO
Bevan on June 23, 2010 at 1:10 PM
My homes value has dropped 30%. My state precludes local authority raising property taxes more than 3%, so, much as they want to raise taxes on folk losing massive amounts of equity, they cannot so…my taxes should fall this year and my Mortgage payment drop a lot.
JIMV on June 23, 2010 at 1:13 PM
Ed,
Those are the words of a simpleton. Come on. The geniuses know better. They will “create” sales. And they will “create jobs”. Just give them enough time.
antisocial on June 23, 2010 at 1:22 PM
Nearly 1,300 prison inmates wrongly received more than $9 million in tax credits for homebuyers despite being locked up when they claimed they bought a home, a government investigator reported Wednesday.
The investigator said 241 of the inmates were serving life sentences.
In all, more than 14,100 taxpayers wrongly received at least $26.7 million in tax credits that were meant to boost the nation’s slumping housing markets, said the report by J. Russell George, the Treasury Department’s inspector general for tax administration.
The IG report estimates that 2,555 taxpayers wrongly received $17.6 million in tax credits for homes that were bought before the credit was enacted.
An estimated 10,282 taxpayers wrongly received credits for homes that were also used by other taxpayers to claim the credit. Investigators were unable to quantify the amount of money they received, “but all indications are that the total will be in the tens of millions of dollars,” the IG’s office said in a statement.
Investigators also found 87 IRS employees who may have improperly claimed the credit, though the review was ongoing.
AcidReflux on June 23, 2010 at 1:22 PM
The best way is to let it play out. What benefit do you think the intervention has delivered? Nothing. There are still foreclosures happening. If the economy is allowed to recover, that will take care of the crisis best. The market correction was long due for the hyper-inflated real-estate market.
You can’t avoid the pain. Either you take it in over a decade or let it play out naturally.
antisocial on June 23, 2010 at 1:27 PM
I don’t know when mediaum term ends, but we will have unemployment arround ten percent until a few years after Obama leaves, whenever that is.
burt on June 23, 2010 at 1:27 PM
During the years 2002-2007 there were several million homes built that were sold as investments. Remember all those financial geniuses who were buying 5, 10, 20 houses in Phoenix and Miami?
All those millions of homes that were overbuilt last decade will not be built this decade. And $8K credit or not there are still more houses than are needed right now.
Housing construction will start up again once the excess inventory is sold (or destroyed). It took several years of overbuilding to get here, it will take sever years to under building to get back to normal.
Where I blame Obama is for throwing tens of billions of dollars down the drain to artificially create demand. But aside from that, there’s nothing he or anyone else can do….short of suspending the fundamental laws of supply and demand.
angryed on June 23, 2010 at 1:31 PM
!
Ed, you’re already a Grandfather at 46?
Count to 10 on June 23, 2010 at 1:53 PM
I can see the foreclosures from my house.
I can also see November from my house.
Mr_Magoo on June 23, 2010 at 2:16 PM
33%
That’s really unexpected
It has crashed so far…
It’s Cars for Clunkers
But in the Housing Market.
More bubbles popping.
Haiku Guy on June 23, 2010 at 2:19 PM
Some weeks ago I made a quip about the next program up: ‘Funds for Felons’.
And people thought I was joking…
ajacksonian on June 23, 2010 at 2:28 PM
Your approach is all wrong.
What you need to do is find a large company in an industry you know absolutely nothing about. Then you threaten to break their arms and legs unless they turn $20 Billion over to you. Take a lawyer and some muscle along to help make your point. Don’t forget to inform the company that they will have no say in how the $20 Billion is spent.
Result: you have a $20 Billion slush fund at your disposal. ENJOY!!
This is how it’s done. In the future, pay better attention to the news.
/sarc>
landlines on June 23, 2010 at 2:45 PM
COMING SOON: “Alms for Aliens”…
landlines on June 23, 2010 at 2:47 PM
Over the past couple of years, I have developed a new found fondness for my house. I think I’ll stay here for a while. ;-)
Mr_Magoo on June 23, 2010 at 3:29 PM
Look!…
Over here!…
Bright shiny things!!!
The Ugly American on June 23, 2010 at 3:48 PM
Man, just think of all the illegal Mexicans who won’t have work building new houses…what’s wrong with that damn racist Bush up there?! Oh, wait a second here….?
Dr. ZhivBlago on June 23, 2010 at 4:16 PM
Anti-Social:
I don’t agree. The only ones winning in this are the banks. All homeowners are losing. While prices may have been overinflated in the 80s and 90s, that’s where Americans put their wealth. If they sell at a loss, they have less to contribute to the economy. One thing we know is that the incentive worked…and it should be continued until the market can function on its own. Do nothing and you see the results with no promise that there’s an end to the pain.
The CJ Political Report on June 23, 2010 at 5:27 PM
The CJ Political Report on June 23, 2010 at 5:27 PM
The money has to come from somewhere. Either it is taken out of the economy as taxes or it is taken out of the economy as inflation.
Given the government cut of every transaction it comes out as a net loss.
MSimon on June 23, 2010 at 7:25 PM