Kagan: The NRA is kind of like the KKK

posted at 2:40 pm on June 18, 2010 by Ed Morrissey

National Review’s Robert VerBruggen has spent some time perusing the documentation that the Clinton presidential library has been willing to release on Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan.  While President Barack Obama casts Kagan as a moderate and an independent thinker, a couple of documents show Kagan as so hostile to the NRA and its advocacy for gun rights that she compared them at least once and perhaps twice to the KKK:

National Review has learned that in 1996, Kagan apparently tied the NRA to the KKK — yes, the KKK — while debating the Clinton administration’s position on a bill.

The bill in question was the Volunteer Protection Act, which, when it was passed and signed the following year, protected some non-profits’ volunteer workers from tort liability in certain cases. The administration worried that it would apply to volunteers from unlikable non-profits.

Two documents discovered at the William J. Clinton Presidential Library and obtained byNational Review suggest that Kagan was involved in these discussions. One does not contain her name, but the handwriting appears to be hers. (You can see an example of Kagan’s handwriting here.) It has the name of administration colleague Fran Allegra at the top, and lists two “Bad guy orgs” that might be covered — the NRA and the KKK.

The second does have Kagan’s name on it; it is a memo from Allegra to Kagan. Allegra reports that he checked the IRS’s “Cumulative List of Organizations Described in Section 170(c)” — the list of tax-exempt organizations, which, he says, are the only organizations the bill would cover — and that neither the NRA nor the KKK was on it. “If you have other names you want me to run down in the Cumulative List, I would be glad to check them out,” he adds, suggesting that Kagan requested the initial check of the NRA and the KKK.

This comes out at an interesting point in time.  Nancy Pelosi reached an accommodation with the NRA on the DISCLOSE Act, one that ended up torpedoing its chance at passage, at least for the moment.  Kagan’s comparison suggests that Pelosi’s deal would have been tantamount to dealing with “bad guys” like the KKK, a domestic terror organization aimed at ethnic and religious minorities, primarily African-Americans.

If this is what passes for mainstream thought in the Obama administration (and for that matter in the Clinton administration), then … well, I can’t say I’m terribly shocked.  When candidates like Obama run on class-warrior platforms, it shouldn’t surprise anyone to find that impulse to demonize people isn’t just bounded by income or wealth levels.  Putting the NRA, a peaceful and law-abiding organization that defends the political and legal interests of gun owners in exercising a Constitutional right, in the same league as the Klan shows a judgment that is not mainstream or properly tempered, but extremist and hyperbolic.

That’s not the kind of thinking that we need on the Supreme Court, and not the kind of nominee Obama represented Kagan to be.  Her confirmation may be all but assured at this point, but hopefully the Judiciary Committee will press Kagan hard on this issue.  Clearly, the efforts to close the Clinton library to the committee are intended to hide evidence like this, and the committee should balk at taking a vote until all of the documentation from the Clinton administration has been released and reviewed in detail.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

slam dunk, obarfy

blatantblue on June 18, 2010 at 2:42 PM

Shocked, shocked, says Claude Rains.

retiredeagle on June 18, 2010 at 2:43 PM

If this is what the most transparent administration ever is willing to release about Kagan, what do you imagine is being hidden away as deeply as possible?

Now I’m off to Cabelas because as soon as this news gets out, all the gun stuff is going to become scarce again.

Bishop on June 18, 2010 at 2:43 PM

Why’s Kevin James being picked for the Supreme Court??

TugboatPhil on June 18, 2010 at 2:44 PM

Actually, that IS mainstream in today’s Democrat Party. Anyone who disagrees with their far left agenda is labeled a racist, hatemonger, Nazi, or militia member.

Doughboy on June 18, 2010 at 2:44 PM

but hopefully the Judiciary Committee will press Kagan hard on this issue.

key word there Ed…I can see Sessions pressing her, but not graham or hatch…

cmsinaz on June 18, 2010 at 2:44 PM

it’s nice we are getting all this information on a friday afternoon…

cmsinaz on June 18, 2010 at 2:45 PM

To think, this is a tiny bit of this gal’s papers! This bho and clinton will not give us ALL of what she has said or done. She is a real dandy sc nominee!
L

letget on June 18, 2010 at 2:45 PM

The NRA was formed by disgruntled Democrats?

Jim708 on June 18, 2010 at 2:46 PM

So, exactly how many Constitutional Amendments does Kagan agree with?

Dr.Cwac.Cwac on June 18, 2010 at 2:46 PM

Well that is one limitation of PDF’s you can’t do a search for handwritten stuff. They must have missed that before they let those out! Good detective work at NR.

echosyst on June 18, 2010 at 2:46 PM

Hope and change,indeed.

kingsjester on June 18, 2010 at 2:47 PM

The fourteenth amendment was passed in large part for the purpose of applying the second amendment to the states so that the freed slaves could acquire guns to defend themselves against the KKK. The NRA, of course, leads in defending the second amendment.

Kagan’s learning apparently excludes history and the Constitution.

levi from queens on June 18, 2010 at 2:47 PM

the KKK, a DNC backed, funded, & endorsed domestic terror organization aimed at ethnic and religious minorities, primarily African-Americans.

fronclynne on June 18, 2010 at 2:48 PM

What did you expect.

Kenosha Kid on June 18, 2010 at 2:48 PM

In the real world that alone would sink her nomination. Sadly we no longer live in the real world.

Johnnyreb on June 18, 2010 at 2:48 PM

Anything and anyone who does not fully subscribe to the Marxist/Leninist theory is

a Nazi / KKK member

angryed on June 18, 2010 at 2:53 PM

Just one more measure of Obama’s incompetence..

PatriotRider on June 18, 2010 at 2:54 PM

“From my cold, dead hands”

KinleyArdal on June 18, 2010 at 2:55 PM

Kagan is kinda like dog ugly.

jp on June 18, 2010 at 2:55 PM

Whenever I see a picture of Kagan, I expect her to suddenly yell: “Hey, Abbott!”

Emperor Norton on June 18, 2010 at 2:55 PM

“The NRKKKA…” -Rev. Jeremiah Kagen.

Akzed on June 18, 2010 at 2:57 PM

Wow … I didn’t know I belonged to the KKK. This administration has really opened my eye’s. Apparently, I’m also a Nazi.

ColumbusConservative on June 18, 2010 at 2:59 PM

Kagan’s learning apparently excludes history and the Constitution.
levi from queens on June 18, 2010 at 2:47 PM

.
Hey, she went to Law School, they don’t teach that stuff there.
.
But, since she knows all about social justice she’s “well rounded”.

LincolntheHun on June 18, 2010 at 2:59 PM

I’m not sure this qualifies as her saying the NRA is like the KKK. All it really says is that she doesn’t think the NRA is suitable to polite company, and the KKK is the only other organization she can think of that is likewise unsuitable.

Should it tell us something that the IRA and the PLO aren’t mentioned?

Count to 10 on June 18, 2010 at 2:59 PM

National Review’s Robert VerBruggen has spent some time perusing the documentation that the Clinton presidential library and Massage Parlor has been willing to release on Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan.

It’s not surprising. Obama’s incompetence..?

Don’t think so. Obama is deliberate and calculating.

Kini on June 18, 2010 at 2:59 PM

HEY! They never gave me my sheet when I joined. What a ripoff.

faol on June 18, 2010 at 3:01 PM

The Times reports, “gun-control efforts were a hallmark of the Clinton Administration. Kagan had been involved in an executive order requiring all federal law-enforcement officers to install locks on their weapons.”

Kagan may have worked on legislation to effectively close gun shows. “Those moves angered the National Rifle Association which became more alarmed in 1998 when Clinton proposed closing the ‘gun show’ loophole allowing firearm purchases without background checks.”

Her efforts to restrict importation of some guns, mandate trigger-locks on guns of federal law-enforcement officers and efforts to close gun shows are three issues to raise during Kagan’s Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing. Expect Kagan to dodge direct questions about gun-grabbing activities during the Clinton years.

A couple of us were discussing Kagan at the range yesterday and her attempts at weakening the second amendment.

fourdeucer on June 18, 2010 at 3:04 PM

Well, they do rhyme.

Kagan apparently went to the Jesse Jackson school of deep thought.

Idiot.

NoDonkey on June 18, 2010 at 3:05 PM

OINK
OINK
OINK
OINK
OINK

SDarchitect on June 18, 2010 at 3:05 PM

Yeah, she’s a mainstream moderate liberal says Obama…you can trust Obama, can’t you?

AUINSC on June 18, 2010 at 3:05 PM

faol on June 18, 2010 at 3:01 PM

They short sheeted you.

NoDonkey on June 18, 2010 at 3:05 PM

The NRA was formed by disgruntled Democrats?

Jim708 on June 18, 2010 at 2:46 PM

I’ve been told that the KKK originated as a vigilanty group that went after criminals among the newly freed slaves, and died out as things became more orderly, but was revived again as a strong-arm group for the southern Democratic Party.

Though I really haven’t researched it much myself.

Count to 10 on June 18, 2010 at 3:05 PM

Now I know why I’m always conflicted when I fire my S&W 586 ……… it’s black in color !!!

Jerome Horwitz on June 18, 2010 at 3:07 PM

Count to 10 on June 18, 2010 at 3:05 PM

You’re mostly correct, though the “revived Klan” in Indiana early in the 20th century was almost exclusively Republican.

Akzed on June 18, 2010 at 3:09 PM

What is wrong with the judiciary committee members? This is an appointment for life! Why would they even consider her nomination unless everything is disclosed.

I am fed up with this business as usual crap. This stuff is so obvious that the only thing that can fix this is to throw everyone of them out when they run for election. I’m serious. You can’t tell the good guys from the bad so let’s start over.

Vince on June 18, 2010 at 3:09 PM

A Michael Moore fan. Awesome. Oh, I bought another 350 rounds yesterday. Wal-Mart was nicely stocked. And Kagan can eat shit.

MadisonConservative on June 18, 2010 at 3:10 PM

Now I’m off to Cabelas because as soon as this news gets out, all the gun stuff is going to become scarce again.

Bishop on June 18, 2010 at 2:43 PM

I finished my shopping monday at Sportsmen Guide, everything on the way also adding a Micro Tech STG-E4 to my collection today.

heshtesh on June 18, 2010 at 3:11 PM

Well hell, we have a tax cheating Democrat in charge of the IRS and another tax cheating Democrat in charge of the tax code, so why not have an anti-Bill of Rights person in charge of interpreting the Bill of Rights.

rbj on June 18, 2010 at 3:12 PM

When you own a gun, no matter what your color or creede, we are now ALL KKK members.

upinak on June 18, 2010 at 3:15 PM

I’ve been told that the KKK originated as a vigilanty group that went after criminals among the newly freed slaves, and died out as things became more orderly, but was revived again as a strong-arm group for the southern Democratic Party.

Though I really haven’t researched it much myself.

Count to 10 on June 18, 2010 at 3:05 PM

Jimmah Carter launched his bid for Guv of Georgia from the hall of a pro-Klan splinter group. The KKK and Dhims in the deep south went hand in hand back in the day.

Archimedes on June 18, 2010 at 3:15 PM

So what was that about civil rights organizations, again?

Last I checked in the Heller case the NRA can be considered a civil rights advocacy organization. Of course it always has been…

Need to get my Para-Ord 14.45 checked out next week… plus more ammo as my range time will now go up. Way up.

ajacksonian on June 18, 2010 at 3:15 PM

You’re mostly correct, though the “revived Klan” in Indiana early in the 20th century was almost exclusively Republican.

Akzed on June 18, 2010 at 3:09 PM

?

Count to 10 on June 18, 2010 at 3:15 PM

I’ve been told that the KKK originated as a vigilanty group that went after criminals among the newly freed slaves, and died out as things became more orderly, but was revived again as a strong-arm group for the southern Democratic Party.

Though I really haven’t researched it much myself.

Count to 10 on June 18, 2010 at 3:05 PM

It was formed by a former Confederate General, Nathan Bedford Forrest, as a guerrilla force to combat the federal occupation. Thing was, as soon as the Southern states were welcomed back into Congress, the Klan became unnecessary. After that, it simply became an anti-black terrorist group, then eventually anti-Jew, anti-Mexican, anti-Catholic, anti-immigrant, anti-Communist, anti-everything pretty much. The definitive white supremacist bunch until the Nazis came along. They bobbed back and forth until the 80s, then the proliferation of the Aryan Nations absorbed much of the Klan’s membership. Now the White Nationalist movement is basically an umbrella for all those sick creeps. You know, like Senator Byrd(D-WV). And yes, the Klan is based on the ideology of the old-school Southern Democrats.

MadisonConservative on June 18, 2010 at 3:21 PM

You’re mostly correct, though the “revived Klan” in Indiana early in the 20th century was almost exclusively Republican.

Akzed on June 18, 2010 at 3:09 PM

Wait, let me guess, you read that on wikipedia?

fronclynne on June 18, 2010 at 3:22 PM

You’re mostly correct, though the “revived Klan” in Indiana early in the 20th century was almost exclusively Republican.

Akzed on June 18, 2010 at 3:09 PM

Wanna prove it.

upinak on June 18, 2010 at 3:22 PM

You compared the National Rifle Association… to the Ku Klux Klan?!?!

And now you want us to believe that you are in some way shape or form fit to serve on the Supreme Court of the United States?

I don’t like doing it twice in one day, but…

Private Pyle, you have got to be sh**ting me!!

JohnGalt23 on June 18, 2010 at 3:23 PM

Here in Ohio, the NRA has endorsed Democrat Gov. Strickland over Kasich, so can I now tell everyone that it’s pretty much like the KKK endorsed Strickland?

myrenovations on June 18, 2010 at 3:34 PM

I am sick and tired of being labeled a racist or a hatemonger simply because I disagree with The Regime in Power.

Holger on June 18, 2010 at 3:35 PM

Wanna prove it.

upinak on June 18, 2010 at 3:22 PM

I think he’s referring to Edward Jackson’s election to governor of Indiana, as he was both a Republican and a Klansmen. It’s a weak link, since Warren McCray was governor just a couple years before Jackson won, and was both a Republican and one of the Indiana Klan’s greatest adversaries.

MadisonConservative on June 18, 2010 at 3:37 PM

Kagan: The NRA is kind of like the KKK
Jun 18, 2010 2:40 PM by Ed Morrissey

Elena, you undoubtedly meant to say La Raza is kind of like the KKK

ya2daup on June 18, 2010 at 3:40 PM

crap, thought that white fabric I got with my Glock purchase was a cleaning cloth….now I have an oil stained hood.

Renee on June 18, 2010 at 3:40 PM

If I am not mistaken,, the Democrat Party in Indiana was bankrolled and controlled by the KKK re everything I have read.

retiredeagle on June 18, 2010 at 3:41 PM

You’re mostly correct, though the “revived Klan” in Indiana early in the 20th century was almost exclusively Republican.

Akzed on June 18, 2010 at 3:09 PM

Really? Who besides Edward Jackson?

Del Dolemonte on June 18, 2010 at 3:41 PM

She’s as mainstream as Robert Byrd.

/sarc

cs89 on June 18, 2010 at 3:41 PM

Democrats hate the idea that the people have the ultimate trump card to their dreams of power.

Holger on June 18, 2010 at 3:44 PM

The EPA is nothing but a massively taxpayer funded liberal hit machine and she’s worried about the first civil rights organization that only stays afloat on individual donations?

Libs a fine reliable piece of hypocrisy.

Speakup on June 18, 2010 at 3:47 PM

You’re mostly correct, though the “revived Klan” in Indiana early in the 20th century was almost exclusively Republican.

Akzed on June 18, 2010 at 3:09 PM

Really? Who besides Edward Jackson?

Del Dolemonte on June 18, 2010 at 3:41 PM

David Stephenson.

Akzed is absolutely correct in his statement, but by itself, it is a bit deceiving.

Yes, much of the Indiana Klan in the 1920′s was Republican (although far from exclusively). And it was the biggest Klan in the country, and probably the most politically powerful. But that it was largely Republican makes sense in the fact that Indiana at the time was one of the most Republican states in the Union, as much perhaps as the Deep south States were Democratic strongholds.

Further, while a big chunk of the Indiana Klan was Republican, and in fact for a brief period of time took over the state GOP, it was more of a Ponzi scheme than a political organization. Essentially the Klan was selling $1 white sheets for $25, and justifying it on political grounds. Further, there was a large part of the Indiana GOP that was anti-Klan, and when the corruption caught up with the Klan, it was that anti-Klan GOP that was there to stick the knife in.

JohnGalt23 on June 18, 2010 at 3:53 PM

JohnGalt23 on June 18, 2010 at 3:53 PM

Stephenson changed his affiliation from Democrat to Republican when he split off from the official KKK of Georgia. Again, weak argument. And again, the Republican governor McCray was against the Klan.

MadisonConservative on June 18, 2010 at 3:57 PM

MadisonConservative on June 18, 2010 at 3:57 PM

Stephenson changed his affiliation from Democrat to Republican when he split off from the official KKK of Georgia.

True, but he did most of the political organizing as a Republican, and IIRC, convinced a lot of people to move to Indiana and help him organizing a pro-Klan GOP faction.

And again, the Republican governor McCray was against the Klan.

Which is why I talked about the anti-Klan GOP faction that eventually brought Jackson down and brought Stephenson to jail.

JohnGalt23 on June 18, 2010 at 4:03 PM

Kagan: The NRA is kind of like the KKK

Then I guess she thinks I’m kind of like a Grand Cyclops.

ncborn on June 18, 2010 at 4:12 PM

True, but he did most of the political organizing as a Republican, and IIRC, convinced a lot of people to move to Indiana and help him organizing a pro-Klan GOP faction.

Yes, but it’s pretty evident that his actions had a lot less to do with any attachment to the Republican Party, and a lot more to do with his desire to create a KKK faction as different from the original as possible. Spite.

Which is why I talked about the anti-Klan GOP faction that eventually brought Jackson down and brought Stephenson to jail.

JohnGalt23 on June 18, 2010 at 4:03 PM

And that same Klan also spearheaded the investigations to get McCray taken down. The Indiana Klan was politically powerful, but they were also basically a rogue organization.

Meh, one way or another, they’re just the same band of xenophobic bloodthirsty maniacs, not dissimilar from the Provos in Ireland.

MadisonConservative on June 18, 2010 at 4:13 PM

Oh what can the National Rifle Association do to affect political action in the Senate, having only 4,000,000 or so paying members…
.
4,000,000 advocates who vote, call their Senators, and generally express themselves at the suggestion of the NRA leadership.
.
Ummmm, 4,000,000 dues-paying members who can bankroll political ads in the home states of Senators during the most contested elections in the 21st Century (so far)…
.
Yeah, Ms. Kagan, you might want to disavow that averred relationship of NRA = KKK. You don’t want to disappoint Barry by flubbing this new job interview, do you?
.
4,000,000 advocates. Can you say “information overload?”

ExpressoBold on June 18, 2010 at 4:19 PM

Maybe Sen. Robert Byrd can clear this up for her.

drunyan8315 on June 18, 2010 at 4:22 PM

Is she talking about the same KKK that was started by Democrats to counter the Republican push for black rights?

Is she re-writing history or just stupid?

riverrat10k on June 18, 2010 at 4:25 PM

This is one of the few things I could see actually making them have to withdraw her. The NRA is not someone people in particular states want to cross. Harry Reid, for instance, touts his closeness with the NRA quite a bit. Those races in places like Indiana, Ohio, Kentucky, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, they can’t support her. I know those are open or Republican held seats, but the Ds have been running from gun control for a decade now, this would torpedo whatever progress they have made.

Plus, senators from all over the midwest and central & upper plains parts of the country stay on the good side of the NRA. It could wipe all of them out of the senate. I can’t see Kent Conrad, Max Baucus, Ben Nelson, John Tester, Tim Johnson, and several others not voting for her over this.

lizzie beth on June 18, 2010 at 4:26 PM

Elena, you undoubtedly meant to say La Raza is kind of like the KKK

ya2daup on June 18, 2010 at 3:40 PM

Forgot about the most racist organization currently extant. Thank you! Also, include the Congressional Black Caucus that would not allow a white congressman to join.

riverrat10k on June 18, 2010 at 4:28 PM

When we read about the history of the Bad Old Days of Jim Crow, we always read about the lynchings of black men.

What we never read about are the blacks who didn’t get lynched, that is, the black American men who took their Second Amendment rights seriously. They owned firearms and were willing to protect their families from the Democrat governments–backed and sponsored by the KKK. Condi Rice’s father was one such man (Alabama); my matrilineal great-grandfather was another (Mississippi and Oklahoma). (My great-aunt tells me that her father and her four brothers open-carried everywhere they went.)

Such men had word-of-mouth reputations as “crazy n-words”–that is, “crazy” enough to stand again Democrat/KKK oppression–and were deemed off-limits for the rope. Too risky.

The new KKK is what is looming on the horizon. But blacks won’t be the only targets of oppression this time. Sorry if this gets me banned but I can’t be silent.

baldilocks on June 18, 2010 at 4:52 PM

In the picture, front of this thread, Obama looks like a fool who’s besotted with himself.

Schadenfreude on June 18, 2010 at 5:04 PM

But, but, but … she was admiring Orrin Hatch’s rifle just the other day, wasn’t she?

KS Rex on June 18, 2010 at 5:08 PM

When we read about the history of the Bad Old Days of Jim Crow, we always read about the lynchings of black men.

What we never read about are the blacks who didn’t get lynched, that is, the black American men who took their Second Amendment rights seriously. They owned firearms and were willing to protect their families from the Democrat governments–backed and sponsored by the KKK. Condi Rice’s father was one such man (Alabama); my matrilineal great-grandfather was another (Mississippi and Oklahoma). (My great-aunt tells me that her father and her four brothers open-carried everywhere they went.)

Such men had word-of-mouth reputations as “crazy n-words”–that is, “crazy” enough to stand again Democrat/KKK oppression–and were deemed off-limits for the rope. Too risky.

The new KKK is what is looming on the horizon. But blacks won’t be the only targets of oppression this time. Sorry if this gets me banned but I can’t be silent.

baldilocks on June 18, 2010 at 4:52 PM

Bingo. Whether it’s blacks, gays, women, 18th century rebels, or any other group that has reason to fear assault on their person, it’s amazing what the right to own a firearm can do that an activist never can.

MadisonConservative on June 18, 2010 at 5:23 PM

Bork her!

Disturb the Universe on June 18, 2010 at 6:07 PM

It’s pretty obvious that she isn’t going to be on the Court. Everybody better get their attention off this stupid Klan crap and figure out who’s the running back she’s blocking for.

I confess I do not have a guess on who it might be but that person is out there in the shadows, waiting to be called onto the field. If we aren’t ready for him/her…

platypus on June 18, 2010 at 6:31 PM

and the committee should balk at taking a vote until all of the documentation from the Clinton administration has been released and reviewed in detail.

Fat chance…When I saw the headline my blood started to boil…errrrr…
Keel haul it…

jerrytbg on June 18, 2010 at 6:36 PM

One word: FILIBUSTER.

Cylor on June 18, 2010 at 6:58 PM

this is worth a read…that is if you haven’t already.

jerrytbg on June 18, 2010 at 7:19 PM

oops…

jerrytbg on June 18, 2010 at 7:20 PM

what? something wrong with the site?

jerrytbg on June 18, 2010 at 7:21 PM

last try.

jerrytbg on June 18, 2010 at 7:23 PM

Kagan as so hostile to the NRA and its advocacy for gun rights that she compared them at least once and perhaps twice to the KKK:

–Comparison: The quality of being similar or equivalent; likeness: no comparison between the two books. So I guess the world is similarly comparing the US and Algeria because we’re both in the same Group in the World Cup?

Jimbo3 on June 18, 2010 at 8:25 PM

And just to be clear: Comparing doesn’t mean determining something is comparable. That would be as dumb as saying Minnesota is the same as Texas just because they’re both states in the US.

Jimbo3 on June 18, 2010 at 8:32 PM

She needs to be pressed on this and pressed hard! I’m sick of these freaking radical a$$holes. I’m sick of being labeled and grouped with terrorist organizations. It’s like the entire world is upside down. Organizations and people who value are constitution are the bad guy and our president bows to the enemy. This is just par for the course. If the Republicans on the committee fold on Kagan… I’m already close to being done with that damn party.

crashland on June 18, 2010 at 8:50 PM

Bork her!

Disturb the Universe on June 18, 2010 at 6:07 PM

That is imposable, she is not eminently qualified.

Slowburn on June 19, 2010 at 2:21 AM

What the hell is up with all this talk about whether she is “mainstream” or not? Mainstream doesn’t mean anything. It has nothing to do with the truth, which is what actually matters.

The question that should be asked about her is whether her views and opinions correspond to reality, not whether 50% of the people plus 1 share those views.

leereyno on June 19, 2010 at 6:23 AM

I am sick and tired of being labeled a racist or a hatemonger simply because I disagree with The Regime in Power.

Holger on June 18, 2010 at 3:35 PM

You’ll find it’s the liberals that are the racists. They are obsessed with it.

We need to tell them to sit down and shut up and shrug off the insult like it came from a child because they call people racist over EVERYTHING.

scotash on June 19, 2010 at 4:22 PM