Housing starts plunge to 2010 low in May
posted at 12:15 pm on June 16, 2010 by Ed Morrissey
The only people surprised by this result are the analysts at Reuters — and even they predicted a drop of some kind at the end of the home-buyer tax credit in April. They didn’t expect to see this large a drop, and they also note that the rest of the year looks pretty bleak as well. And, for a bonus, home starts didn’t rise as much as first reported in April, either (via Instapundit):
Housing starts fell more than expected in May to their lowest level in five months, a government report showed on Wednesday, as a popular homebuyer tax credit that had buoyed construction activity over the past two months expired.
The Commerce Department said housing starts dropped 10 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 593,000 units, the lowest level since December. The percentage decline was the biggest in 14 months. April’s housing starts were revised down to show a 3.9 percent increase, which was previously reported as a 5.8 percent rise.
Analysts polled by Reuters had expected housing starts to fall to 650,000 units. Compared to May last year, starts were up 7.8 percent.
New building permits, which give a sense of future home construction, dropped 5.9 percent to a 574,000-unit pace in May, the lowest in a year. That followed a 10.9 percent drop in April and compared to analysts’ forecasts for a rise to 630,000 units.
Again, had anyone followed the year’s indicators, this would not come as a surprise. Inventory still remains too high to provide much incentive for new starts, especially in the resale market, where foreclosures offer cash buyers their best deals. Mortgage applications dropped in May by over 40% to a low not seen since April 1997.
As a result, home builders not only lost enthusiasm for new building at present, they’re not betting on the future, either. The permit process is time consuming, but a necessity to get projects in motion within a few months. The relative lack of interest in new permits — its lowest level in a year — indicates that players in the home-construction market see this as a turndown of at least moderate length, and it hits at what should be prime building season.
I’ve written repeatedly about the Obama administration’s kick-the-can economic policies, such as Cash for Clunkers and the short-term home-buyer tax credit, and their inability to do anything but delay the inevitable revaluing of property and credit. Like C4C, the short-term government incentives in the housing markets haven’t created a new class of qualified and enthusiastic buyers; they have only subsidized sales that would have occurred anyway in the future. And as one of Instapundit’s readers noted, the problem with stealing sales from the future is that the future always arrives, and expectedly.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
a 4 year old could figure this one out. Give people $8K to buy a house in April and everyone who would have bought in June, July, August, September will buy early. Then in June, July, August, September, the buying is non-existent.
angryed on June 16, 2010 at 12:18 PM
Double Dip!
bopbottle on June 16, 2010 at 12:18 PM
Let’s kick in $100 billion to the housing industry. Problem solved.
Hey, I could be president!
fogw on June 16, 2010 at 12:18 PM
Great Unexpectations.
Holger on June 16, 2010 at 12:19 PM
Zero’s spreadin’ around the wealth alright. Thinly.
Cicero43 on June 16, 2010 at 12:19 PM
You mean, when you stop giving folks extra money to buy houses, fewer of them buy houses?
Shocker!
cs89 on June 16, 2010 at 12:24 PM
Obama: You mean to tell me that you need jobs and money to have home sales?! Why didn’t anyone tell me this earlier!
Rham: B-but you said you wanted everyone to live off the government. Right?
Obama: Oh yeah, I forgot. Hey, when’s tee time?
Free Indeed on June 16, 2010 at 12:26 PM
Gee, does this mean that Captain KickAss is now going to sic his Rump Rangers on the Real Estate industry?
pilamaye on June 16, 2010 at 12:26 PM
We have 100s of thousands of existing homes coming onto the market due to foreclosure. We have 100s of thousands of new, unoccupied homes that no one is buying. This is called a glut. Yet somehow, we expect builders to continue building new homes … why?
Mr. Pickles on June 16, 2010 at 12:26 PM
I’m a Realtor. From New Year’s Day through April 30, I was busy as a bee. Since the tax credit ended, crickets! Listings aren’t even getting showings. Pathetic…pathetic and predictable.
Chewy the Lab on June 16, 2010 at 12:27 PM
Hey, they only over-estimated by like 48%. These guys are good. I think I did my math right. 3.9% is the real number and they were 1.9% over. Oh well, I guess if I did it wrong I might have a shot at becoming a professional economic analyst.
forest on June 16, 2010 at 12:28 PM
“Can’t I just play my golf game?”
-PBHO
Bishop on June 16, 2010 at 12:28 PM
Why buy a new house, when so many are on the market, and likely better-built?
Vashta.Nerada on June 16, 2010 at 12:28 PM
Oh, and Fannie & Freddie are delisting themselves from the NYSE
http://thehill.com/blogs/on-the-money/banking-financial-institutions/103477-fannie-freddie-to-move-off-new-york-stock-exchange
Seems they can’t maintain the minimum stock price.
Thanks Barney Frank & Chris Dodd et al.
rbj on June 16, 2010 at 12:29 PM
Just like “Cash for Clunkers”, anyone else see a pattern here?
GarandFan on June 16, 2010 at 12:31 PM
To give the poor illegals jobs, of course.
Rebar on June 16, 2010 at 12:31 PM
Ed and everyone who could pass Econ 101 knew this would happen.
We need a National Housingcare program!
Rezko could be the czar.
IlikedAUH2O on June 16, 2010 at 12:33 PM
OT:
wonderful…BP kowtowed to dear leader
cmsinaz on June 16, 2010 at 12:37 PM
This downturn must be affecting bridge building as well. There’s a noticeable shortage of trolls around here lately.
Patrick S on June 16, 2010 at 12:37 PM
Yep, and my wife and I both make our living in the construction industry… Thank goodness we took most of our retirement and paid down our overhead a year ago. My business is a service oriented business, so I have work. My wife has an architectural practice, and her business is down 70%.
Bunker down and prepare for the worst case scenario, cause it’s coming…
Keemo on June 16, 2010 at 12:37 PM
I honestly think donks don’t understand the multipler, job driving forces that private sector investment in business creates, as opposed to that same money paid out to public sector employees and the unemployed. I understand a lot of it is a quest for union money and votes, but, man, we’re far enough into this thing now, someone should at least have a clue.
a capella on June 16, 2010 at 12:43 PM
I had a lady who worked for me that took out $5,000 to buy Freddie and Fannie stocks when they were about 90-95 cents, she listened to some idiot that told her they would be over $5 or so in less than a year because the government would prop them up. I told her they were Zombie stocks, dead but they didn’t know they were dead yet. Glad I didn’t fall for the hype.
Johnnyreb on June 16, 2010 at 12:44 PM
Twenty billion dollar slush fund which will be guarded as closely as investment in Social Security withholding.
a capella on June 16, 2010 at 12:47 PM
An Open Letter to this Film’s Director:
Isn’t it time to stop shooting scenes with the Stunt President and bring in a real one?
The American Public
ya2daup on June 16, 2010 at 12:52 PM
I wonder if I can get my house plans cheaper and cost to build cheaper now that I know they aren’t doing so well.
upinak on June 16, 2010 at 12:52 PM
Just wait until this financial “reform” bill passes and nobody can get a mortgage anymore unless they have 20% down and an 800 credit score. There won’t be any existing homes sold either.
rockmom on June 16, 2010 at 12:56 PM
Whose ass will he decide to kick?
MJBrutus on June 16, 2010 at 12:57 PM
We don’t need new homes. We need people to fill the glut that the corrupt developers have already built.
How much more farm land has to be raped by the hit and run developers and their banking cronies?
Fill what we’ve got, then MAYbe build again.
rickyricardo on June 16, 2010 at 12:57 PM
Well, crr6 and Shipley are still lurking about, but some of the others have vanished. When was the last post from GrowFins, for example?
They know their Messiah is impossible to defend now.
Del Dolemonte on June 16, 2010 at 12:57 PM
This Dem congress and this AKOTUS need to stop with their social engineering. I wish we could impeach them all, declare public sector Unions unlawful, conduct an independent audit of all fed and state agencies and then see how much surplus we’ll have. After this is done, audit all welfare and public assistance programs, institute drug testing (no pee pee no gumbint check, food or housing); and finally, end the fed.
Key West Reader on June 16, 2010 at 1:06 PM
Great points, every one! When do you announce your candidacy?
ya2daup on June 16, 2010 at 1:12 PM
I’m pretty sure Grow Fins is that redheaded young lady we see in the unemployment thread picture. Money got tight and she might not be able to blog while job hunting anymore.
hawkdriver on June 16, 2010 at 1:15 PM
That’s what me girl and I are counting on. We not sure the land will be any cheaper, but building and existing homes we expect to get a bit of a break on.
hawkdriver on June 16, 2010 at 1:17 PM
We’re not…
hawkdriver on June 16, 2010 at 1:17 PM
Anyone else seeing this workout like the permanent rebates now offered by car companies?
chemman on June 16, 2010 at 1:18 PM
Vitriol towards the builders. That will work just fine.
chemman on June 16, 2010 at 1:22 PM
The answer to the problem seems obvious to me. If giving big tax credits, giving cash for clunkers and stuff like that results in the car industry working, the construction industry working, on so on, then we simply need to make those payments a permanent feature of the economy! Then, people will buy houses, people will buy cars, people will be back to work building them and everything will be good!! Since it is all just federal money anyway, there shouldn’t be any problems, right, right?
/typical lib without a clue where “federal money” comes from
Fatal on June 16, 2010 at 1:42 PM
And what is wrong with that exactly? The reason for the bubble and bust is that money was lent to anyone with a pulse.
I’m not sure when, but at some point in between 2002 and 2007, there must have been a new amendment added to the constitution that said every American is entitled to owning a home, regardless of his/her ability to pay for it. Because allowing people to buy $500K houses with $0 down and a 500 fico means just that.
angryed on June 16, 2010 at 2:09 PM
Less kowtow than collusion, in all likelihood.
Count to 10 on June 16, 2010 at 3:26 PM
If Hopey Changey doesn’t lift the ban on drilling in the Gulf it’s gonna get “unexpectedly” worse.
TN Mom on June 16, 2010 at 4:16 PM
I can hear the brakes right now on the housing market train, skid to a quick stop. We had a lot of closings until November and hardly any since the first of the year.
yoda on June 16, 2010 at 5:01 PM