On The Table
posted at 6:06 pm on June 12, 2010 by Doctor Zero
Some grim humor could be found earlier this week, in the spectacle of the President’s “deficit reduction commission” going over budget and running out of money. The entire premise of the commission is absurd. The deficit is not the problem. It’s a symptom. The disease is government spending. No administration or Congress dominated by Democrats has any chance of diagnosing this disease, let alone treating it effectively. There is some chance the Republicans will do better, but only if we keep on top of them.
Watching this Presidential commission discuss strategies for deficit reduction is like watching a pack of gluttons talk about getting in shape while they prowl up and down a buffet table. They linger over the deep-fried mortgage interest deduction caps, dip their spoons into the rich chocolate of the VAT tax, and lick their lips as they wait for the expired Bush tax cuts to pop out of the oven. They end up perched on the edge of creaking chairs, tittering at the wonderfully naughty idea of devouring everyone’s 401k plans for dessert. It’s a nauseating spectacle that will only end when they’re escorted from the restaurant by angry voters.
The President made some headlines when he reversed his campaign promises, and spoke of broad tax increases being “on the table.” This is an outrage, in light of the vast, corrupt, and wasteful government Obama presides over. It’s also dangerously foolish. The American economy has no more pounds of flesh to feed the government leviathan. From here on in, everything cut from us will be muscle and bone. Higher taxes will consume the wealth needed for investment and job creation, reducing the value of the economy… leading to calls for even higher tax rates, to maintain the government’s revenue stream.
President Obama was elected by an emotionally and morally exhausted populace, convinced it could find refuge from the rough battlefields of international prominence and free-market responsibility in the arms of maternal government. The automated growth of government requires the public’s continued fatigue. We are assured that every nickel of the bloated State is locked into place, protected by a permanent constituency, and every dollar of its future growth is a matter of destiny. Spending cuts are impossible, so if you want something done about that deficit, we’ll have to talk about some exciting new tax increases. As the 2010 campaign swings into high gear, the Democrats will be cautiously probing voters, to learn if they’re weak enough to believe the opponents of those “inevitable” tax increases are the deficit-busting spendthrifts.
I think the Democrats will be disappointed. The Tea Party movement is all about citizens re-discovering their strength, and rising to challenge a system that claims to be inescapable. There are a lot of things we want to put “on the table.” For starters, let’s not send almost half a billion dollars to fund a genocidal terror state dedicated to the destruction of our allies. We don’t want to eliminate all foreign aid, but we can certainly halt the madcap extravagance of checkbook capitulation to remorseless evil.
No politician has any business talking about tax increases until ObamaCare is repealed. It’s the most comprehensively failed legislation of the modern era. Like a taxi that runs on plutonium, it’s costing us a fortune, and making us sick, even while it’s sitting there and doing nothing. Sold with fanciful promises and fraudulent cost estimates, it’s another expensive scheme to buy votes with taxpayer money, ending with a planned crisis the government will be only too happy to step in and “solve” by seizing even more of our wealth and liberty. Its passage stymied serious attempts at real improvements to our health-care system, including tort reform and allowing the interstate sale of insurance plans to increase competition. As with so many other delusional Big Government programs, the opportunity cost of passing ObamaCare, and passing up on reasonable plans that enhance individual liberty, rivals its staggering price tag. We’ll come trillions closer to a balanced budget by shredding it.
Another item that must be on the table is the abolition of public-sector employee unions. The entire concept is ridiculous, a system that transforms taxpayers into serfs for a pampered aristocracy that hates them. Public employee unions produce a cycle of demand, despair, and violence that begins with fingers bitten off, and ends with murder by arson in the streets of Athens. Much of the loot from Obama’s $800 billion stimulus heist was used to pay off public unions. All talk of government “austerity” is meaningless babble until these organizations have been dissolved.
The titanic federal payroll surged with incredible speed under Obama, even as private sector employment crashed. This trend must be reversed, quickly and forcefully. A government reduced to playing Parcheesi with census workers to inflate employment figures has drained far too many resources from the private sector. Reducing government payroll will cause unemployment to rise in the short term, but releasing both workers and capital into the private sector is the only way to improve the long-term health of the economy. Those terminated government workers will have to live without their gold-plated benefit packages and bloated salaries, and they’ll need to make do with the same health-care options as the rest of us… but we will find good use for their talents, beyond the imagination of central planners.
The state religion of environmentalism goes on the table, too. The lawless, unelected bureaucracy of the Environmental Protection Agency must be dissolved. Further attempts to divert public funds into the global-warming fraud should be prosecuted. No more rogue government agencies with limitless power, bottomless budgets, and fanatical agendas. No more forced tithe to the primitive spiritual beliefs of our arrogant elite.
The time has indeed come to put many things on the table. All of them are dusty, overpriced relics of discredited statist theories and collectivist ideology. How long has it been since Americans were allowed to tackle anyserious problem by enhancing their liberty? Who can remember the last time we approached a situation by reducing the burden of regulation and taxation on our private citizens, unleashing their energy and creativity? When was the last time we were allowed to view a crisis as an opportunity for the private sector, rather than the State?
The government’s table covers thirteen trillion square yards, held together with platinum nails. It seats an exclusive clientele of top politicians and their allies, but there’s plenty of room beneath it, for the rest of us to fight over the scraps. We can fit an awful lot of garbage on that table, when we’ve dismissed the representatives who can’t suggest anything but tax increases as a solution to the deficit. After we complete that process in 2012, we can start chopping the table up for firewood, to fuel the unfettered forges of American industry and imagination. What happens after that will be unpredictable, uncontrollable, and exhilarating. We shouldn’t want it any other way.
Cross-posted at www.doczero.org.
This post was promoted from GreenRoom to HotAir.com.
To see the comments on the original post, look here.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
yes, it’s time to abolish them govt unions.
they are a part of the union-politician complex – which is more costly and wasteful than the so-called military industrial complex, (a phrase coined by Ike – who had originally intended to include Congress in the complex!).
i also call it the axis of taxes.
reliapundit on June 12, 2010 at 6:11 PM
Brother Z, AlGore’s divorce lawyers disagree. Pass the Green Tea?
chaswv on June 12, 2010 at 6:12 PM
Not just yes, but he11 yes!!!
Kaptain Kickasz, you are being called!
trs on June 12, 2010 at 6:13 PM
All unions are extortion; public service unions have the distinction of extorting all of us.
Count to 10 on June 12, 2010 at 6:13 PM
+1000
That was a classic Doctor Zero!
Dire Straits on June 12, 2010 at 6:13 PM
The state religion of environmentalism goes on the table, too.
===================================================
Since the Environmntal Wacko’s have won many battles,
they are the Number #1 to blame for DeepWater Horizon
drilling deep,and forcing this disaster!!
Next up, Unions are nothing more than a fundraiser that
helps power the Liberal Party,and in that,they are an
extention of a Political Party!!
canopfor on June 12, 2010 at 6:16 PM
Hell yes!!
sisterchristian on June 12, 2010 at 6:17 PM
The pols negotiating the stupid contracts don’t care, it’s not their money and they are totally unaccountable for whatever the cost.
tim c on June 12, 2010 at 6:20 PM
I’ve been saying for quite a while at work, where I am a union stagehand, that public sector unions are a clear conflict of interest. When my union negotiates with my company, we can not give donations to the people sitting across from us at the negotiation table to insure they keep their jobs. Public unions CAN and DO in a clear conflict of interest. They should be illegal. My union is bad enough without that corrupting influence.
oddjob1138 on June 12, 2010 at 6:20 PM
Another one hit out of the ballpark, Doc…
… This needs to be said LOUD and OFTEN!
Seven Percent Solution on June 12, 2010 at 6:21 PM
Bingo!
Buy Danish on June 12, 2010 at 6:22 PM
I have been a member of “public service unions”. Two of them actually. Greatest job security I ever had. While working at the last one, I admitted to my supervisor that due to a mistake on my part, I actually feared being fired. His jaw dropped. Then he laughed out loud and said, “When’s the last time you heard about ANYBODY here being fired?” That’s only ONE of the problems with public service unions.
oldleprechaun on June 12, 2010 at 6:27 PM
There are a lot of things we want to put “on the table.” For starters, let’s not send almost half a billion dollars to fund a genocidal terror state dedicated to the destruction of our allies. We don’t want to eliminate all foreign aid, but we can certainly halt the madcap extravagance of checkbook capitulation to remorseless evil.
==========================================================
Repeal the Terrorist Welfare Deal!!
canopfor on June 12, 2010 at 6:27 PM
I am not sanguine on this.
It’s perverse to have people who can vote their own bosses [and have two sets of bosses at that]. It tends not to work out well.
meep on June 12, 2010 at 6:28 PM
Nice job Doc! Loved it!
KCB on June 12, 2010 at 6:29 PM
Doc if you keep putting out these beauties and someone is going to call you up to the major leagues!
Dire Straits on June 12, 2010 at 6:30 PM
Largest-ever federal payroll to hit 2.15 million
The era of big government has returned with a vengeance, in the form of the largest federal work force in modern history.
The Obama administration says the government will grow to 2.15 million employees this year, topping 2 million for the first time since President Clinton declared that “the era of big government is over” and joined forces with a Republican-led Congress in the 1990s to pare back the federal work force.
======================================================
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/feb/02/burgeoning-federal-payroll-signals-return-of-big-g/
canopfor on June 12, 2010 at 6:34 PM
Money – Pink Floyd + Lyrics
=============================
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JkhX5W7JoWI
canopfor on June 12, 2010 at 6:35 PM
Doc Zero you have a gift. Thanks
One more thing to consider. How about the nearly 50% of those who don’t pay income taxes getting the benefit of numerous programs that we “rich” people don’t receive but have to pay for. There is absolutely no reason why there should not be a minimum of at least $150 that you should have to pay in income tax.
CA PG&E just raised the amount >$40k family of four for reduced costs on their energy bill. Why work hard if a govt. entity has first claim on the fruits of your labor.
arnold ziffel on June 12, 2010 at 6:35 PM
Terminations, Reductions and Savings
Office of Management and Budget
====================================
Terminations, Reductions and Savings identifies programs that do not accomplish their intended objectives, are not efficient, or that replicate efforts being completed by another initiative and recommends these programs for either termination or reduction. There have been 126 terminations, reductions, and other areas of savings identified that will save approximately $23 billion next year alone.
==================================================
http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2011/assets/trs.pdf
canopfor on June 12, 2010 at 6:38 PM
It’s time.
themediansib on June 12, 2010 at 6:41 PM
Doctor Zero, that’s some damn good writing.
Gang-of-One on June 12, 2010 at 6:42 PM
When I think of public service unions I think of blood suckers who are living on the economy without producing anything to add to the GNP. Allowing these leeches to unionize was one bad idea which I believe is attributed to Carter.
docdave on June 12, 2010 at 6:44 PM
Obama Versus Bush on Spending
Very little is safe for Democrats this fall.
By KARL ROVE
JANUARY 21, 2010, 2:35 A.M. ET
============================================================
That argument won’t fly for two reasons. First, at some point this administration has to take responsibility for itself. It’s also not even close to accurate. Consider that from Jan. 20, 2001, to Jan. 20, 2009, the debt held by the public grew $3 trillion under Mr. Bush—to $6.3 trillion from $3.3 trillion at a time when the national economy grew as well
—————
By comparison, from the day Mr. Obama took office last year to the end of the current fiscal year, according to the Office of Management and Budget, the debt held by the public will grow by $3.3 trillion. In 20 months, Mr. Obama will add as much debt as Mr. Bush ran up in eight years.
Mr. Obama’s spending plan approved by Congress last February calls for doubling the national debt in five years and nearly tripling it in 10.
Mr. Bush’s deficits ran an average of 3.2% of GDP, slightly above the post World War II average of 2.7%. Mr. Obama’s plan calls for deficits that will average 4.2% over the next decade.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704320104575015072822042394.html
canopfor on June 12, 2010 at 6:44 PM
If the union fire dept is on strike and your house burns down, who do you sue, the union or the govmint agency? Just want to be ready in case we have a bad fire season.
Kissmygrits on June 12, 2010 at 6:45 PM
Brother Z, AlGore’s divorce lawyers disagree. Pass the Green Tea?
chaswv on June 12, 2010 at 6:12 PM
chaswv: Al Gore’s daughter also filed for divorce as well!:)
=========================================================
Al Gore’s daughter Karenna’s marriage is also on the rocks
Following in the footsteps of her parents – Al Gore and Tipper Gore, Karenna Gore’s marriage is also on the rocks. She has already separated from her husband Andrew Schiff, since the last 2 months.
http://www.thaindian.com/newsportal/world/al-gores-daughter-karennas-marriage-is-also-on-the-rocks_100378366.html
canopfor on June 12, 2010 at 6:51 PM
Doc, that is perfect.
ddrintn on June 12, 2010 at 6:54 PM
+100 Bravo!
becki51758 on June 12, 2010 at 7:02 PM
We have to get to the table before we can chop it up, and the last time I checked all of us and our families are subject to rough treatment by the local security, i.e. the unions themselves. Looters have to be driven away, they rarely leave on their own without an armful of tv’s and stereos.
Bishop on June 12, 2010 at 7:03 PM
Hey DZ you need to be writing speeches for whoever happens to be the next presidential candidate from the Right.
Behind His/Her acceptance speech at the convention there should be a billboard with the questions highlighted above, instead of fake stone columns.
Why is it that your ideas aren’t occurring to prominent MSM pundits? Could it be that your analysis is focused on our own national issues and the MSM is trying to rig one world collective solutions?
This is Beautiful stuff, and you need a broader audience pronto.
ontherocks on June 12, 2010 at 7:04 PM
Eliminating public sector unions is a must. And also eliminate 5 percent of federal government jobs per year for 10 years. Eliminate government contract employees.
Dasher on June 12, 2010 at 7:05 PM
Public-sector unions are a perversion of an abomination of a travesty of a profanity and an absolute disgrace to humanity. But other than that, I have no opinion.
RBMN on June 12, 2010 at 7:10 PM
instead of fake stone columns.
ontherocks on June 12, 2010 at 7:04 PM
ontherocks:Here ya go!!
=========================
Spinal Tap Tiny Stonehenge
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xlf5ucFanpY
canopfor on June 12, 2010 at 7:17 PM
Bravo!
golfmann on June 12, 2010 at 7:28 PM
I’d be laughing out loud picturing that in my head if it wasn’t so true.
Thanks Doc….keep up the good work.
BTW……Have you hooked up with Sarah Palin yet????
tencole on June 12, 2010 at 7:43 PM
Doc, you should write a sequel to Atlas Shrugged. Your style is like reading Ayn Rand.
Mojave Mark on June 12, 2010 at 7:47 PM
As I said before.
Doctor Zero should be required reading in high school. To bad they are controlled by unions.
Slowburn on June 12, 2010 at 7:47 PM
Another excellent piece.
Generally all politicians are power-hungry, regardless of which side of the House they sit in. But the citizenry is what confuses me. If you support Democrats and the Progressive vision, why? Unless you are one of the chosen few in the upper echelon of the Progressive Party, you’re nothing but a working stiff being used as a prop; one that is better kept hungry rather than well-fed. Don’t you get that? Don’t you see that you’re life will never actually improve under Progressive policies?
BKeyser on June 12, 2010 at 7:55 PM
“The “deficit reduction commission” will be run in a bi-partisan manner like the 9/11 Commission”.
Oh, does that mean Franklin Raines and Barney Frank will be on it, and maybe Jamie Gorelick making a cameo appearance?
LA Conservative on June 12, 2010 at 7:56 PM
That was funny, but that was 3 hops and a giant leap from what I posted.
Might I suggest given the hour of day and day of week that you now switch from caffeine to the alcoholic beverage of your choosing because your mind seems to be running at warp speed. /
ontherocks on June 12, 2010 at 7:57 PM
This was a great post, but dear Lord, it is all so depressing.
Missy on June 12, 2010 at 8:24 PM
Or like a diet coke with a big mac and large fry.
The fact that the major media does not tear this guy apart for the outrageous salaries given and the obvious payoffs is further proof of bias.
CWforFreedom on June 12, 2010 at 8:36 PM
Out bleepin’ standing!!!!
NeoKong on June 12, 2010 at 8:47 PM
I was never able to get a Gov.job, I only spoke English and was overqualified.
Just go to any Gov. run business and see why they lose money every year.
Post Office Directive: Wait until the line is at least 6 deep before going on break.
DMV, same directive
IRS: Don’t interrupt me while I am talking to my husband.
Just a few of my experiences.
PRIVATIZE!!!!!
concernedsenior on June 12, 2010 at 8:58 PM
canopfor on June 12, 2010 at 7:17 PM
=======================================
That was funny, but that was 3 hops and a giant leap from what I posted.
Might I suggest given the hour of day and day of week that you now switch from caffeine to the alcoholic beverage of your choosing because your mind seems to be running at warp speed. /
ontherocks on June 12, 2010 at 7:57 PM
ontherocks:Fair enough,so now,will travel back in time!!:)
==========================================================
Obama God! Democrats build a temple for Barack
1:33 AM on 29th August 2008
————————————————–
Barack Obama was mocked in the American press yesterday for making the most important speech of his life on a set decked out like an ancient temple.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1050017/Obama-God-Democrats-build-temple-Barack.html#ixzz0qgxECXup
canopfor on June 12, 2010 at 9:22 PM
I could go back to the Reagan administration, but don’t have to do so.
As recently as 2006, our lefty friends hated deficit spending:
http://www.rense.com/general69/tyr.htm
IlikedAUH2O on June 12, 2010 at 9:28 PM
Govt. unions have become the taxpayers biggest enemy. They extort us with threats of govt. shutdowns etc. if we don’t fork over more money. It’s nothing but legalized organized crime and it’s way past time to abolish them all. Public and private. It should be done state by state on voter referendums on the ballot. Yaxpayers are way past fed up.
roninacreage on June 12, 2010 at 9:36 PM
As far as I am concerned, a missing piece of this recipe for re-institution of a small decentralized government, is an Ethics Committee with some real sharp teeth.
To have to watch Charlie “The Weasel” Rangle, or Barney “The Lisp” Frank slipping through another censure of an ineffective ethics violation, while smugly thumbing their nose at the People, is one that has lead me to the medicine cabinet searching for the high blood-pressure pills.
Punishment of a sever and certain nature, for financial misconduct while in office, is platform a candidate of either party can espouse and get my vote.
magicky on June 12, 2010 at 9:40 PM
Dr. Zeros words are wonderful but do nothing to address the wholesale corruption that the nexus of Congress, corporations and Wall Street has presented to us.
Freedom, deregulation and liberty is meaningless in a society that has lost it ethical anchor.
Insurance companies, Multi-national banks, Wall Street are rotten to the core and unless they are fiercely regulated by an impartial government and executives of all major industries subjected to hard time in maximum security prisons for stepping over ethical boundries….freedom is meaningless and the free market is dead.
rickyricardo on June 12, 2010 at 9:45 PM
I forgot to mention the most important part:
Congress persons should be subject to lifetime bans from lobbying, term limits and especially severe punishments for violating the public trust.
rickyricardo on June 12, 2010 at 9:47 PM
How about we do away with all agriculture subsidies as well?
Partisan on June 12, 2010 at 9:48 PM
Great Post.Never miss a Doc Zero post.
The next crew in needs to make a law that says that if they put a bill together and deliberatly leave items out so that it scores better with the goal being to deceive the public than they should be prosecuted for fraud and go to jail. All the Dems who voted for Obamacare knew they were fraudulent numbers. All of them should be in jail.
journeyintothewhirlwind on June 12, 2010 at 9:50 PM
Zippety do Doc.
PaCadle on June 12, 2010 at 10:09 PM
FIFY.
AnotherOpinion on June 12, 2010 at 11:06 PM
That was closer to my point, and while I was reading more I was pleasantly distracted by the usual MailOL lingerie ads and Brit bimbo pics bordering your timely research.
Fortunately The Boss is out of town this weekend as she gets a little prickly if she senses a quickening of my respiration while I’m
viewinger, reading the political blogs on my laptop.ontherocks on June 12, 2010 at 11:23 PM
Excellent, Doc Z. I too have been thinking of the changes required to right this ship, and banning public sector unions is way up there, along with a mandate to not only balance the budget but to actually shrink government by a few percent a year.
Oh, and if they come for what’s left of my 401k, they won’t be needin theirs.
2ipa on June 12, 2010 at 11:27 PM
What purpose does a government employees union serve?
desertdweller on June 12, 2010 at 11:38 PM
If this country does at least start to make this happen with a conservative majority in the House this coming election then this country is finished and WILL be spent into oblivion…. if it hasn’t already.
I don’t like thinking in worst case scenarios and being all doom and gloom but Dr. Zero articulates very well the destructive nature of our govt and why it HAS to be stopped. This country, as great and mighty as it is, can only take so much.
Yakko77 on June 12, 2010 at 11:50 PM
My last post took 50mins to show up despite reloading and opening another header on the browser while having no problems posting @ AoS at the same time.
Sorry if any duplicate posts happen, but that’s the second time that’s happened here recently.
Anyone else?
ontherocks on June 13, 2010 at 12:27 AM
No problems here
SgtSVJones on June 13, 2010 at 2:33 AM
What’s to prevent them from being charged, now, under the RICO law?
ya2daup on June 13, 2010 at 6:46 AM
With precious few examples to the contrary, why is the default position of the federal government that more must be spent, rather than less?
ya2daup on June 13, 2010 at 6:50 AM
For starters, let’s not send almost half a billion dollars to fund a genocidal terror state dedicated to the destruction of our allies.
This must go to the states affected by the oil blowout,to hell with hamas.
Col.John Wm. Reed on June 13, 2010 at 7:42 AM
Great read to wake up to. I agree, our next conservative POTUS should hire DocZ to write their speeches. He has a gift and does need a wider audience
Boggles my mind too.
SoldiersMom on June 13, 2010 at 8:53 AM
Palin/Zero 2012
Lockstein13 on June 13, 2010 at 9:00 AM
IF they have actual talents. You’re assuming an awful lot, Doc.
Squiggy on June 13, 2010 at 9:02 AM
Why are we talking just federal employees? The number of State and local public employees is probably worse.
rock the casbah on June 13, 2010 at 9:04 AM
Dr. Zero, is on target. Union’s have priced the employee’s they claim to represent out of competition. Further, they do not represent the workers they repress them into doing their will.
In Hawaii you have no choice, the moment you are hired you are a member of the union that represents the workers within the jobs classification. Dues are automatically withdrawn without an option to opt out without being blacklisted in union newsletters and elsewhere.
Major (PhD) research I’ve done highlights that for the last 40 years, since Statehood, negotiations have not focused on health and safety (the original and proper focus of collective bargaining). Unions have only demanded more pay without any offer of producing more. Therefore the unions reputation as extortionists is well earned.
To return the balance between Unions, Workers and Management it is essential for Unions to re-organize and let wages seek their own level. Unions should use the workers dues to negotiate increased benefits that dovetail into those offered by the employer. For example, a worker that is not a union member gets a health care benefits package because the State of Hawaii is the largest employer in the the State.
Therefore, Unions should be seen as useful to the employee and useful to the employer. First support the ouster of members who abuse the system and bilk the benefits without producing anything takes from the other workers benefits and pay package. Second, vice focus on automatic pay raises without any productivity gains demeans the employee. If unions would review workers Position Descriptions they could insure their members are taking advantage of improvements in technology or new ways to accomplish generate intangible benefits. Producing twice as much with fewer hours is, equate to a pay raise.
Let’s develop a Triad (State, Employee, and Union). The Unions primary duty would be to offer benefits and insurance programs that dovetail with the employer’s thus expanding the employee’s ability to retire comfortably which would increase the benefits of membership. Also, unions need to show how a slacker erodes those benefits to allow peer pressure on the slacker to tow the line or be ousted and replaced with a productive one.
Wage increases are attainable via improvements found in technology and improved procedures. Workers who are able to develop such improvements are rewarded, and the other workers are encouraged to emulate. Also, if productivity increases and the State gains in saving dollars in the services they provide then, just like a stockholder, are rewarded with an increase in their pay.
The outcome is a win-win for all participants who are vested with the productivity of the organization.
MSGTAS on June 13, 2010 at 9:45 AM
And don’t forget he included Scientists and their research projects.
Tim Burton on June 13, 2010 at 12:51 PM
FIFY Doc.
Amendment X on June 13, 2010 at 2:12 PM
YES! They can not only vote themselves a living, but go on strike between elections to get more. Biggest. Scam. Evah.
Akzed on June 13, 2010 at 2:12 PM
Unions are organized against non-union workers in the same field. It is government-empowered collusion to limit the labor pool.
Not only must public sector unions be decertified, but all laws empowering unions must be repealed.
Labor is a commodity. Making it artificially scarce drives up the price. Unions are labor cartels, and should be left to fend for themselves in the market place. If they are good for the marketplace, they’ll survive. If government empowerment were removed, they wouldn’t survive. In short, they couldn’t survive in a free market.
Akzed on June 13, 2010 at 2:18 PM
Darn right it’s on the table. Time to break the public “service” unions. It’s too late for concessions, they must be eliminated.
forest on June 13, 2010 at 7:33 PM
2.15 million * $75,000 = $161.25 billion
If 1/2 percent goes to union dues that would be $805 million
Dasher on June 13, 2010 at 11:06 PM