McGinniss: Beware the power of the fully operational Palin machine
posted at 1:36 pm on June 1, 2010 by Ed Morrissey
The hyperbole of Joe McGinniss’ proximity to the Palin family continues apace on two fronts today. First, McGinniss himself decided to grant an interview to NBC’s Today show and Matt Lauer after demanding that ABC leave the premises last week. In the interview, McGinniss goes on offense, offering an absurd rebuttal that even Lauer doesn’t buy and then comparing Sarah Palin’s criticisms of his move to … Nazi Germany? Newsbusters has the transcript:
Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
JOE MCGINNISS: Morning, morning Matt. I wish you were here. And before we even start I need to correct something that I think Janet probably was just simply misinformed about or didn’t understand. I’m standing on this porch right now, where the Palins took a picture of me surreptitiously. They photographed me, standing on my own porch. And what she said in her Facebook page was that I was overlooking their garden and their swimming hole and their bedrooms and whatever. The fact is that I was on the other end of this porch. I don’t know if your camera can pan down there but I was at the other end, as far away from the Palin home as I could get. I was leaning over the fence looking into the vacant lot next door. And what I was doing was talking on the cell phone.
LAUER: I wonder Joe if she wasn’t referring to what you were doing during that-
MCGINNISS: So I’d like to correct, I’d like to correct that right away Matt.
LAUER: Okay I just wonder if, if Governor Palin wasn’t referring to what you were doing at the moment the photo was taken but what you could do from that deck.
In fact, the criticism Palin offered on her Facebook page didn’t relate to the picture at all, but the view offered by the rental property into the Palin’s house. McGinniss attempted a bit of intellectual dishonesty in pretending that the problem arose from a single moment when he used his new balcony, when in fact the Palin complaint addressed the longer-term problem of having an unauthorized biographer with a view right inside their house. But if that was a little bit intellectually dishonest, McGinniss raised the bar with this wildly inept violation of Godwin’s Law:
LAUER: The local Wasilla newspaper, The Frontiersman, published an editorial that read, quote “Those who are fond of Joe McGinniss might remind him, if he doesn’t already know, that Alaska has a law that allows the use of deadly force in protection of life and property.” I mean any regrets to all this? Do you wish you just rented a different house?
MCGINNISS: No. You know what actually what I’ve learned from that, Matt. And what you just recited, it’s very informative. And I think it’s probably a lesson for the American people of the power Palin has to incite hatred and her willingness and readiness to do it. She has pushed a button and unleashed the Hounds of Hell, and now that they’re out there slavering and barking and growling. And that’s the same kind of tactic and I’m not calling her a Nazi, but that’s the same kind of tactic that the Nazi troopers used in Germany in the ’30s. And I don’t think there is any place for it in America.
That’s not just ridiculous, it reveals yet another journalist who has no idea what the Nazis did in Germany. Nazis didn’t issue complaints about the locations of journalists as a tactic. They beat people in the streets in order to intimidate them out of the political process, mainly Communists, but also defenders of the doomed Weimar Republic. They murdered people by the hundreds in the years leading up to their takeover of Germany, and their closest modern equivalent would be the Basiji in Iran. Criticism of the press does not equate in any rational sense to what the Nazis did in Germany, and anyone who thinks it does has either lost all sense of perspective or is, frankly, an idiot.
That doesn’t mean that some of Palin’s defenders haven’t crossed a line. The Frontiersman should apologize for that statement, which was not just needlessly provocative but also completely unnecessary as well. I’m sure Governor Palin understands her property rights just as well as The Frontiersman does, and she’s handling it appropriately by building a bigger fence and exercising her First Amendment right to criticize McGinniss, a right McGinniss appears to have forgotten. He has the right to rent the property if the owner is willing to rent it to him, and the Palins have the right to publicly criticize him for it. That doesn’t require a review of deadly force defenses nor a historically illiterate reference to Nazi Germany.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 Next »
are there any pictures published with this house/deck/fence? I would like to see some for perspective on how close it really is. I do agree this is so creepy.
karenhasfreedom on June 1, 2010 at 2:45 PM
Here’s Gov. Palin’s response to the Today interview.
Babino on June 1, 2010 at 2:49 PM
Didn’t the nazi call our Marines a similar name. I’m proud to be associated with the best our country has to offer.
AlexJ on June 1, 2010 at 2:51 PM
I think he is paranoid. Has no friends. Since he has a no tresspassing sign on all the trees on his rental property, he must have some mischief up his sleeve.
Tresspassing laws protect property owners. He has little standing with tresspassing laws outside the door of his rental.
seven on June 1, 2010 at 2:54 PM
Why am I not surprised these hacks would not show the statements. Ed, might be worthy of an update in your post.
davek70 on June 1, 2010 at 2:57 PM
You’re right — thank you.
I am over 40. However, I am a trim 135 at 5’8″ and look nothing like Helen Thomas.
All I did was call Ed out on his “needlessly provocative” statement and I get labeled as Helen Thomas’ body double. Geez, people.
DaydreamBeliever on June 1, 2010 at 2:59 PM
Ironic that a man who aims to write an expose’ about someone he dislikes doesn’t like what they write about him on their facebook page.
Turning the tables on an idiot like that just isn’t fair! Only an Nazi would be so unfair.
Scrappy on June 1, 2010 at 2:59 PM
If he makes a bad move, they can get a restraining order on him and that would place him beyond next door. Even dirty old men think they can get by with this.
seven on June 1, 2010 at 2:59 PM
I had sympathy at first like the rest, but after seeing the way she handled the problem I don’t feel as much. Palin is proving she can take care of herself, and that’s a good thing. I don’t want a political leader I feel sorry for. I want to have that little pang of sympathy for her opponents, that is quickly overridden by good sense. If she hadn’t turned this around I would have felt sympathy, but that would not have increased her appeal as a politician.
DFCtomm on June 1, 2010 at 3:00 PM
Ed,
I don’t see why pointing out the law is a problem. That is like a warning to an intruder.
I hope he is pissing in his pants today.
antisocial on June 1, 2010 at 3:06 PM
I don’t think so Ed. After what SEIU and McGiniss have done recently, I think all leftests should be re-introduced to the meaning of private property rights and the Castle Doctrine.
Caper29 on June 1, 2010 at 3:06 PM
Reckon Ole Joe would like it done to him? Ummm,on second thought ,who would want to?!Ugh
ohiobabe on June 1, 2010 at 3:07 PM
.
.
Actually, if you read what I wrote, I was tormenting BlatantBlue with his dark desire for older women.
And he did promise to name his first after me in exchange for the Helen Thomas/ Sasquatch love tape that I procured for him.
Soooo I have not insulted you….yet.
LincolntheHun on June 1, 2010 at 3:09 PM
You called me a “limp-wristed castrati” and then gripe because people compare you to Helen Thomas? Wow, what a wussy.
Ed Morrissey on June 1, 2010 at 3:10 PM
“Now Ed, that is what I call being needlessly provocative,” she said empahtically.
And I am not a wussy,” she said, stamping her foot.
“Nor, even on my worst day, do I resemble Helen Thomas,” she said, as the veins began to bulge in her neck.
DaydreamBeliever on June 1, 2010 at 3:15 PM
LOL! I’ll leave it at that, but I’ll just add that I’ll stipulate that you don’t look anything like Helen Thomas. ;-)
Ed Morrissey on June 1, 2010 at 3:18 PM
I’m over 40, and no where near a statuesque 5’8, but if I’ve learned anything in life, it’s this……
Don’t dish it out, if you aren’t prepared to take it. lol
capejasmine on June 1, 2010 at 3:25 PM
Said Joe “The Stalker” McGinniss, after moving thousands of miles just to live next door to the Palin’s in order to “view” the daily activities of the Palin’s.
DSchoen on June 1, 2010 at 3:27 PM
Look around and see aging liberals babbling like fools is becoming common place. The fact liberalsim is a mental disorder is hard to dispute as the evidence mounts daily.
volsense on June 1, 2010 at 3:30 PM
As you say, the Palins have shown they can handle this. It’s still unfair that they had the problem in the first place.
jwolf on June 1, 2010 at 3:32 PM
How much of that is from long years of drug use and how much from innate stupidity, I wonder?
Mary in LA on June 1, 2010 at 3:33 PM
I wonder why they haven’t sought one? A sympathetic judge might be persuaded that his presence there is needlessly provocative, and honor a request for a restraining order which forces him back to 1,000 feet from their home, or something like that.
This would be a logical solution.
Jaibones on June 1, 2010 at 3:35 PM
Why are Randomhouse and their German overlords, Bertelsmann, getting a pass on this? I’ve written and emailed both, and hope that others will pick up on this as well. This is most likely their advance money that is paying for the house rental, and they both expect to reap the benefits that the freakish and lurid publicity is generating at the cost of the Palin’s privacy.
bofh on June 1, 2010 at 3:36 PM
…steps into the room, hoping to say something snarky about McGinniss…
“…limp-wristed castrato…”
“…Helen Thomas body-double…”
…slowly backing out of room now, hoping not to be seen…
Doorgunner on June 1, 2010 at 3:37 PM
WTF? Ed, I usually love your comments, but this one was way out there.
Weak-kneed moral relativism is something best left to the professionals (i.e. lefties).
Norwegian on June 1, 2010 at 3:38 PM
So that’s the horseface that is stalking Palin.
Hey, Mr. Ed, quit trying to pawn your neurotic and psychotic behaviors onto the Palin family and accept them as your own.
jdflorida on June 1, 2010 at 3:40 PM
I can care less what this “Mcginnis” creep says. He’s a stalker and a fanatical one.
Kudos to the Palins for being this civil thus far…I would have committed bad acts to Mr. Mcginnis long ago.
b1jetmech on June 1, 2010 at 3:40 PM
Now, to be fair, Hitler’s Facebook posts could be brutal…
tom on June 1, 2010 at 3:42 PM
Being a relative youngster of 51, I have often wondered how this whole Nazi thing started. I’ve read a lot about it, but always got the sense that I was missing something.
And Joe McGinnis has obviously found it: the Nazis started off by complaining that sensationalist liberal writers were moving in next door to their target/subjects! This really helps me get a clearer picture of how things went sideways in 1930s Germany.
What decadence.
Jaibones on June 1, 2010 at 3:46 PM
The comment was a joke, as they say themselves. It would have been completely inappropriate if it had come from Sarah Palin or anyone connected to her, but it didn’t.
Granted, liberals are generally incapable of taking a joke as a joke, which explains their hatred of Ann Coulter.
tom on June 1, 2010 at 3:46 PM
What a creep.
kingsjester on June 1, 2010 at 3:47 PM
Come on, that’s a little harsh. Ed’s a nice guy! :)
Brian1972 on June 1, 2010 at 4:00 PM
OBQuiet on June 1, 2010 at 4:06 PM
My apologies. That last post went out prematurely.
I wanted say look how easily you can use that same boiler plate to questions ones motives without actually saying anything real.
OBQuiet on June 1, 2010 at 4:08 PM
There’s an aspect to this that no one has spoken of…
I wonder what kind of electronic surveillance COUNTERMEASURES the Palins will have to deploy…
And will they ever tell us about it…
jerrytbg on June 1, 2010 at 4:26 PM
Ed the Squish. Stalking is a serious matter and the Palins have every right to protect themselves to the limit of the law.
Kalapana on June 1, 2010 at 4:29 PM
Ed, remember the SEIU mob scene at the banker’s house? The left is more than capable of violence. What is your problem with people defending themselves from the thuggish tactics of our homegrown National Socialists?
Kalapana on June 1, 2010 at 4:35 PM
Hey, lighten up on McGinnis. He’s a victim! A victim, I tell you!
Or, as he himself says, “Creepy is as creepy does”.
Oh, wait…
rogersnowden on June 1, 2010 at 4:42 PM
Didn’t his publisher Random House/Bertelsmann have a Nazi past?
Neuron on June 1, 2010 at 4:51 PM
Bertelsmann admits Nazi past
Neuron on June 1, 2010 at 4:53 PM
McGinnis is a stalker and completely delusional. What person would want someone this desperate on their doorstep with their children only feet away from this potential calamity.
volsense on June 1, 2010 at 4:57 PM
If the liberals sign the right consent forms, I may know people who will demonstrate what Nazis and Communists did to political foes and enemies in the press.
We can film it for facebook and have a record for idiots who are tempted to use such inflammatory, dumb references to sell their stupid books.
If Governor Palin were a Nazi, he would be missing by now. Alaska is a big place.
IlikedAUH2O on June 1, 2010 at 4:58 PM
He’s lost it, for some reason. Age? Alcoholism? Who knows.
But he’s really, really entered into a creepy stage.
AnninCA on June 1, 2010 at 4:58 PM
No, he’s not creepy. It’s just that pair of night vision goggles hanging on the wall next to the balcony that’s got the Palin’s concerned.
kurtzz3 on June 1, 2010 at 5:06 PM
Creep to get permanent chair on Hardball or Olbermann show in 5……4……3…..
And this guy is great for creating sympathy for Palin with Indies and Moderates.
And he’s right…….FEAR THE MACHINE.
We’ve already decided that IF….BIG IF….IF she runs I’m taking a leave of absence to work for her campaign and we’re going to build our family vacation around it in 2012.
Why would someone (like us) do that for a Presidential campaign? Because I want my AMERICA BACK……I want it to be MORNING IN AMERICA for my kids……not MOURNING in America.
PappyD61 on June 1, 2010 at 5:10 PM
Life is different in the NW and Alaska. We’re still closer to our frontier roots here. If the lib dem nuts aren’t calling us racists, it’s nazis. I have some advice for Joe, don’t go outside after dark, there’s wild animals that roam looking for their next meal.
Kissmygrits on June 1, 2010 at 5:12 PM
Gee, could it be a result of his mindlessly following a certain political philosophy (liberalism) for his entire adult life?
Naw, it can’t be that. You’re right, it’s because he’s old and a drunk.
Del Dolemonte on June 1, 2010 at 5:14 PM
Not nice to cite the law…just NOT nice…might scare the man.
Good groundwork for when he shows up at the door one night in a drunken stupor…forewarned…
winston on June 1, 2010 at 5:35 PM
Absolute Thread Win.
Kent18 on June 1, 2010 at 5:37 PM
I get where you’re going with this but my thought is that if Palin were a Nazi as McGuiness suggests, he would be very easy to find. He’d be out in the open, yet not moving – if you get my drift.
The projection emulating from this guy is thick enough to support a bull moose, but as we have all come to love and appreciate about Sarah, if you tickle her with a feather, she will beat you senseless with a sledgehammer.
I kind of like that in a leader. Such behavior would not be lost upon either our friends or our enemies.
The last time someone demonstrated such backbone, the moment he was inaugurated four hundred and forty-four days of humiliation ended.
If such a leader were present in the White House today, Israel would not be in the predicament it is in right now as it would be made plain to Turkey, et al, that an attack upon Israel will not go unanswered by us, never mind the IDF.
History does have a way of repeating itself, doesn’t it?
turfmann on June 1, 2010 at 5:39 PM
Creep to get permanent chair on Hardball or Olbermann show in 5……4……3…..
PappyD61 on June 1, 2010 at 5:10 PM
I just want to know which network will be the first to build a studio at the house that Joe’s renting, so we can recieve up to the minute play by play?
heshtesh on June 1, 2010 at 5:58 PM
I’m not calling him a pussy, but…..
PappaMac on June 1, 2010 at 6:01 PM
Why?
The place where Joe “The Stalker” McGinniss hails from might not have “Castle Laws”
In 2006, Alaska updated its “Castle Law” and includes perceived threats to ones children, along with NO “duty to retreat.”
Considering Joe “The Stalker” McGinniss, stated purpose for moving next door to the Palin’s, to stalk, spy on and generally harass the Palin’s and their children, he can be perceived threat to the Palin family.
If he sets foot on their property, under Alaska law, he can be shot.
I’ve never been to Alaskan but I get the impression Alaskans are a LOT LIKE Texans.
DSchoen on June 1, 2010 at 6:24 PM
Heh, killing two birds with one stone makes you my thread winner.
I said killing. NOW I’M A NAZI!!!
hawkdriver on June 1, 2010 at 6:25 PM
What McGinniss can’t comprehend is Sarah Palin is very popular in Alaska. Liberals are simply unable to fathom that. After all everone they talk to hate her, ergo everyone hates her.
McGinniss thought he could get in Palin’s face by renting the house next door. Thought it was a “gotcha.” The town and serious journalists think that’s in poor taste. And he is paying the price.
My guess he will pull out sometime soon.
Corky Boyd on June 1, 2010 at 6:25 PM
No doubt claiming “persecution” as his reason for leaving.
Scrappy on June 1, 2010 at 6:30 PM
If only his luckless sire had had the foresight to do likewise, forty years ago.
Kent18 on June 1, 2010 at 6:33 PM
Nah! Next thing you’ll tell me is that he has a past track record for it. Oh…wait….he does.
GarandFan on June 1, 2010 at 6:33 PM
Sigh…we could have had someone, at least near the Oval Office with some balls to kick butt of the bad guys. The current residents only want to kick the buts of America and our strongest allies…and party down.
Dingbat63 on June 1, 2010 at 6:38 PM
That man has consumed a lot of booze in his life.
seven on June 1, 2010 at 6:53 PM
I just saw him on CNN. What a DB!
The sound was turned down so all I saw was the headline running below his fat face….”Palin declares war on journalist”
Is there any jounalistic integrity left anywhere? Stupid question, I know
Ditkaca on June 1, 2010 at 7:07 PM
McGuinniss is a pig…. what more can I say?
MNDavenotPC on June 1, 2010 at 7:17 PM
Journalist integrity died about 40 years ago (courtesy of Walter Cronkite). It has been replaced by propaganda.
bw222 on June 1, 2010 at 7:37 PM
I might as well push the Nazi metaphor. Hitler compared Jews to vermin and other animals, while this guy compares Palin defenders to, well:
So, who’s using Nazi tactics NOW?! That is, dehumanizing other people with animal metaphors.
*woof*
Paul-Cincy on June 1, 2010 at 7:48 PM
He’s forty? Goodness, he must be a serious boozer like everybody says then, cuz he looks like’s pushing 75 at least! ;-)
(There are 2 Joe McGinnisses – Sr. & Jr. The Palins & their kids have the misfortune of being stuck with the dirty old man one unfortunately & not his 40 y o son who, at least as far we know, is not a creepy drunken perv.)
leilani on June 1, 2010 at 7:59 PM
Anyone know of an email address for Jumpin’ Joe?
Maybe he should hear from some of us.
AJ on June 1, 2010 at 8:06 PM
Really? Obama’s Organizing for America Brownshirts seem to be OK.
ddrintn on June 1, 2010 at 8:19 PM
I say we go after this Joe character. I mean, only scumbags use such hyperbole. Nazi tactics? Next he’ll say that Obama wants to kill grandma with his healthcare bill and set up death panels deciding who will live and who will be snuffed out!
TheBlueSite on June 1, 2010 at 8:44 PM
Paul-Cincy on June 1, 2010 at 7:48 PM
You’re right… my calling him a pig is an insult to all porcine entities. He’s a poor excuse for a journalist at a minimum.
MNDavenotPC on June 1, 2010 at 8:48 PM
I am waiting to see how long a limp wrist, brie sucking liberal pansy can last living a simple life in the Great White North. How much is the penalty in breaking his lease?
bayview on June 1, 2010 at 8:54 PM
This MAssclown is so typical of the breed up here. They live in enclaves around the state where their view is never challenged only agreed with. Eventually they fully believe their own BS and sound like total fools when they speak out in the real world. What a friggin’ joke this guy is.
roy_batty on June 1, 2010 at 8:58 PM
McGinnis’s looks as though he may suffer from fecal alcohol syndrome judging by his picture.
chickasaw42 on June 1, 2010 at 9:03 PM
=Drunk while full of sh1+!
chickasaw42 on June 1, 2010 at 9:04 PM
Better folks than you have been banned from here for less. Just saying…
Mary in LA on June 1, 2010 at 9:16 PM
I really can’t see AP or Ed banning someone for sarcasm. But, who knows?
TheBlueSite on June 1, 2010 at 9:18 PM
I didn’t see no /sarc tag on that there postin’, pardner.
If it looks like a threat of violence, even if you have to tilt your head and close one eye to see it as that, you may feel the swish of the banhammer. Proposing to “go after this Joe character” could be construed as a threat. Verbum sapienti sat…
Mary in LA on June 1, 2010 at 9:21 PM
Sorry, no they shouldn’t. Turn down the radar on liberal sensitivities. We have to stop acting like we’re renting space in their culture. That was good old frontier humor, and also a plain statement of fact.
rrpjr on June 1, 2010 at 9:46 PM
This guy is creepy. And I do hope Palin unleashes the hounds of hell . . . in Nov. 2010. And then again in Nov. 2012.
NebCon on June 1, 2010 at 9:57 PM
Aren’t they just reminding everyone of the formal version of the social compact, and isn’t that appropos as this is ALL about the informal social contract, which this Joe guy seems blind as a bat to. It’s like they’re trying to grab and shake him and say “we should treat each other with a bit more care than you moving in next door to someone so you can write a nasty book about them”.
Paul-Cincy on June 1, 2010 at 9:57 PM
Good point.
He does look like Bernie Ward, opps, i mean inmate # 90569-111
DSchoen on June 1, 2010 at 9:57 PM
That was only the most effective criticism of that bill. So effective that people are still talking about it.
It focused attention on the rationing that will inevitably be necessary with the explosion in costs and our current fiscal situation.
At the root of the death panel metaphor was the academic work of Dr. Ezekiel Emmanuel, brother to WH Chief of Staff Rahm Emmanuel.
I still to this day don’t see the problem with this opinion, and many others are coming around to the same view.
Brian1972 on June 1, 2010 at 10:39 PM
CUDA
Metro on June 1, 2010 at 10:57 PM
Sounds like he is quiet aware of his intentions if he is claiming to be doing the opposite, and he is not happy that others have noticed.
Franklyn on June 1, 2010 at 11:06 PM
Sorry I’m late to the show. Joe Whathisname is a effin pu**y.
TugboatPhil on June 1, 2010 at 11:06 PM
I am frequently amazed at how little folks know about Alaskans, particularly the born-and-raised variety. Alaska is all about live and let live, but keep your crap to yourself. That was primarily the point of the Frontiersman piece. Lower 48 folks just don’t get it, at least not right away.
Guns in Alaska are rather like the plug wrench in your garage. They are tools, and deserve respect as such, but they are not for show and they don’t just lay around getting dusty. Self defense is a way of life. Mr. Creepy-McGinness probably wasn’t aware of that, so he has been informed.
No harm done. Get wise or get out.
tcn on June 1, 2010 at 11:12 PM
You gotta be kidding me. Sanctimonious much? Wait, what am I saying, of course you are.
misterpeasea on June 2, 2010 at 12:23 AM
Sarah Palin’s Creepy, Deranged Stalker Goes On NBC, Calls Americans Nazis, Plays Supersized Victim Card
gary4205 on June 2, 2010 at 12:40 AM
D’OHHH! Once again, I’ve Googled in haste, and now must repent at leisure. ;)
Kent18 on June 2, 2010 at 12:53 AM
Only a psychopath would see nothing wrong in stalking Palin as he is doing, then projecting his own evil onto those who call him on it. And only other psychopaths would see nothing wrong with that.
JimC on June 2, 2010 at 1:29 AM
Joe McGinnisses Sr. is the sort of despicable scum that make a cesspools look inviting.
I hope the acorn hit a trampoline.
Slowburn on June 2, 2010 at 1:36 AM
So which other political candidate does the media/left feel an overwhelming need to live next to and keep tabs on? Romney? Paul? Huckabee?
Nope, Sarah Palin.
They really are obsessed with such an “irrelevant” “no nothing” person…
Hmmmm…
Sharr on June 2, 2010 at 3:44 AM
McGinniss may be living next-door to Sarah Palin at a bargain rent, but Sarah is surely living in his head, rent free.
Haiku Guy on June 2, 2010 at 6:17 AM
Yuck! What a creepy jerk! Is it true?? That creep has a wife?? Yikes!!
Sherman1864 on June 2, 2010 at 7:06 AM
McGinniss is litle more than a stalker–period.
zoyclem on June 2, 2010 at 7:39 AM
I read the news article above on Tapper’s Twitter campaign to get Sarah on his Sunday show. I like Tapper, I don’t know if FOX will let her go, or if she wants to.
It’d be nice to see a slight turnaround of negative comments on other sites, because basically they say she’s a chicken (besides all the other crap they vent).
Now Politifact is what bugs me. If Tapper’s good enough and people are intelligent enough (!!!!!) then there’s no problem with that. Watching Colbert’s segment, if the reporter/journalist is NOT prepared properly to perform a LIVE Sunday show with a guest, then said reporter/journalist has not done their work properly. I know Jake reads here, so I say on this instance there’s no reason to believe Sarah is not truthful.
Keep in mind who she was surrounded with during the McCain campaign, because I smell some q’s going in that direction. If you’re gonna check with them, your likability factor will drop big time.
ProudPalinFan on June 2, 2010 at 7:40 AM
Some people have talent, some people contribute to the world, and some people are intelligent. Then there are people like Joe McGinniss who are insignificant. But those on the left will look up to him, prop him up and give him a pulpit from which to spew. Why? Because they fear Sarah Palin. She might just take away the whole “historic” thing they have going.
afotia on June 2, 2010 at 7:45 AM
If this creep wants to use “nazi” tactics as a description of the Palins, then he’s definitely “Stalinesque” himself typical of what Soviet Communists would do to people. Play with and harass their emotions and minds trying to control them by stalking them. Pretty much an overall democrat strategy anyway. Ever since Sarah Palin “pulled Obama’s pants down” (figuratively) at the Republican Convention by exposing the overall fakeness and falseness of even the stage props they used for him at the Democrat Convention. She threw cold water on all the Obama adulation and worship so the democrats have been out to get her ever since. They have failed and even mocking her with Tina Fey hasn’t worked so now creeps like this pervert are stalking her and her family. The democrats and their flunkies know no shame or limits.
mozalf on June 2, 2010 at 8:00 AM
Event timeline:
1. Joe The Stalker McGinniss moves next door to the Palins
2. Palin builds a fence to block his view of the family
3. Frontiersman mentions Castle Law
4. McGinniss plays victim
5. HotAir falls for it and bends over backwards to avoid being seen as ‘extreme’
fossten on June 2, 2010 at 8:13 AM
Well, so much for that book being the fair, open-minded, and objective piece of quality investigative journalism you claimed it was going to be, huh Joe?
pilamaye on June 2, 2010 at 8:32 AM
Joe has so blown his lifelong credibility, hasn’t he? Amazing how old men blow it sometimes.
AnninCA on June 2, 2010 at 8:46 AM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 Next »