McGinniss: Beware the power of the fully operational Palin machine

posted at 1:36 pm on June 1, 2010 by Ed Morrissey

The hyperbole of Joe McGinniss’ proximity to the Palin family continues apace on two fronts today. First, McGinniss himself decided to grant an interview to NBC’s Today show and Matt Lauer after demanding that ABC leave the premises last week. In the interview, McGinniss goes on offense, offering an absurd rebuttal that even Lauer doesn’t buy and then comparing Sarah Palin’s criticisms of his move to … Nazi Germany? Newsbusters has the transcript:

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

JOE MCGINNISS: Morning, morning Matt. I wish you were here. And before we even start I need to correct something that I think Janet probably was just simply misinformed about or didn’t understand. I’m standing on this porch right now, where the Palins took a picture of me surreptitiously. They photographed me, standing on my own porch. And what she said in her Facebook page was that I was overlooking their garden and their swimming hole and their bedrooms and whatever. The fact is that I was on the other end of this porch. I don’t know if your camera can pan down there but I was at the other end, as far away from the Palin home as I could get. I was leaning over the fence looking into the vacant lot next door. And what I was doing was talking on the cell phone.

LAUER: I wonder Joe if she wasn’t referring to what you were doing during that-

MCGINNISS: So I’d like to correct, I’d like to correct that right away Matt.

LAUER: Okay I just wonder if, if Governor Palin wasn’t referring to what you were doing at the moment the photo was taken but what you could do from that deck.

In fact, the criticism Palin offered on her Facebook page didn’t relate to the picture at all, but the view offered by the rental property into the Palin’s house. McGinniss attempted a bit of intellectual dishonesty in pretending that the problem arose from a single moment when he used his new balcony, when in fact the Palin complaint addressed the longer-term problem of having an unauthorized biographer with a view right inside their house. But if that was a little bit intellectually dishonest, McGinniss raised the bar with this wildly inept violation of Godwin’s Law:

LAUER: The local Wasilla newspaper, The Frontiersman, published an editorial that read, quote “Those who are fond of Joe McGinniss might remind him, if he doesn’t already know, that Alaska has a law that allows the use of deadly force in protection of life and property.” I mean any regrets to all this? Do you wish you just rented a different house?

MCGINNISS: No. You know what actually what I’ve learned from that, Matt. And what you just recited, it’s very informative. And I think it’s probably a lesson for the American people of the power Palin has to incite hatred and her willingness and readiness to do it. She has pushed a button and unleashed the Hounds of Hell, and now that they’re out there slavering and barking and growling. And that’s the same kind of tactic and I’m not calling her a Nazi, but that’s the same kind of tactic that the Nazi troopers used in Germany in the ’30s. And I don’t think there is any place for it in America.

That’s not just ridiculous, it reveals yet another journalist who has no idea what the Nazis did in Germany. Nazis didn’t issue complaints about the locations of journalists as a tactic. They beat people in the streets in order to intimidate them out of the political process, mainly Communists, but also defenders of the doomed Weimar Republic. They murdered people by the hundreds in the years leading up to their takeover of Germany, and their closest modern equivalent would be the Basiji in Iran. Criticism of the press does not equate in any rational sense to what the Nazis did in Germany, and anyone who thinks it does has either lost all sense of perspective or is, frankly, an idiot.

That doesn’t mean that some of Palin’s defenders haven’t crossed a line. The Frontiersman should apologize for that statement, which was not just needlessly provocative but also completely unnecessary as well. I’m sure Governor Palin understands her property rights just as well as The Frontiersman does, and she’s handling it appropriately by building a bigger fence and exercising her First Amendment right to criticize McGinniss, a right McGinniss appears to have forgotten. He has the right to rent the property if the owner is willing to rent it to him, and the Palins have the right to publicly criticize him for it. That doesn’t require a review of deadly force defenses nor a historically illiterate reference to Nazi Germany.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3

Do Joe’s grandkids know that he’s a stalker?

N. O'Brain on June 2, 2010 at 8:52 AM

Sooo, I finally watched the interview, and I’m looking at the dude, and I’m listening to him, and all I could think is “Man, Tom Poston has really let himself go since he died.”

Doorgunner on June 2, 2010 at 8:57 AM

She has pushed a button and unleashed the Hounds of Hell, and now that they’re out there slavering and barking and growling. </blockquot

Sounds good to me.

rrpjr on June 2, 2010 at 9:00 AM

I’m not calling McGinniss’ publisher an absolute IDIOT for allowing this to continue, but I can guarantee that if he publishes a book on this, I will find out who the publishing company is and NEVER BUY ANOTHER BOOK FROM THEM AGAIN… And I buy 10+ books a year…

Khun Joe on June 2, 2010 at 9:13 AM

That doesn’t require a review of deadly force defenses…

Why don’t you just say the Frontiersman acted stupidly.

Extrafishy on June 2, 2010 at 9:29 AM

She has pushed a button and unleashed the Hounds of Hell, and now that they’re out there slavering and barking and growling. </blockquot

Sounds good to me.

She merely let it be known what that miserably piece of filth was up to.

It appears to have annoyed a large number of people.

Slowburn on June 2, 2010 at 9:52 AM

Susana Martinez is another example of the “Palin magic.” In a May 15 poll, she was trailing by 1%. Sarah goes to Arizona, personally endorses Susana and Martinez wins a five-way primary by 23 points over her closest opponent.

Regardless of whether Palin seeks the 2012 Presidential nomination or not, she is building an incredible power base.

bw222 on June 2, 2010 at 10:09 AM

He is just another old man who bought into his own publicity. He honestly thought he could outwit commonsense.

NOBODY buys his “innocence.” Of course, he moved next door to spy on the family. And that’s pathetic.

It speaks volumes about what he really thinks about his chances of cooking up a great revelation about Palin.

She’s been so skewered that only idiots think there are secrets left in this woman’s life. So he’s embarked upon a losing book proposition.

He’ll have nothing to report, unless he makes it up.

To do that, he has to move next-door and create a story.

So far, his plan is totally failing. He has only managed to turn himself into a stalker, a creepy old guy, and someone who you wouldn’t leave your grandkids with in a room alone.

Way to go, Joe!

AnninCA on June 2, 2010 at 10:16 AM

Why don’t you just say the Frontiersman acted stupidly.

Extrafishy on June 2, 2010 at 9:29 AM

Why? I thought the editorial was funny.

AnninCA on June 2, 2010 at 10:17 AM

Why? I thought the editorial was funny.

AnninCA on June 2, 2010 at 10:17 AM

Yikes! I’m agreeing with AnninCA!

;)

VelvetElvis on June 2, 2010 at 10:41 AM

When Palin posted her first facebook announcement of McGinniss next door, I wondered why on earth Palin had not yet purchased the properties next-door given that she certainly has the financial means to make neighbors very generous offers.

McGinniss is gutter scum, for sure. But Palin needs to be pro-active to obtain any level of privacy, as she now is doing–after the fact, and after the sordid publicity. But she left the situation ripe for plunder by the scum of the earth, not exactly a tribute to wisdom and prudence, warding off danger in advance. Best defense is a good offense, as the saying goes.

maverick muse on June 2, 2010 at 10:57 AM

I read that the Palins tried to buy it, maverick muse. And that they rented it last summer.

But when they tried to get hold of the owner for this summer (many times), or to buy it, they couldn’t.

Which is kind of surprising, considering the owner seems to think they owe her money.

Alana on June 2, 2010 at 11:08 AM

Geez. He’s telling NBC he’s trying to respect the Palins’ privacy?!?!? And trying to tell Matt Lauer he’s as far away from the Palins as he can get?
Who is he seriously trying to kid here?
This is just too incredible.

ToddonCapeCod on June 2, 2010 at 11:11 AM

maverick muse on June 2, 2010 at 10:57 AM

Palin explained in the appearance on the Glenn Beck radio program last week that they had rented this house last summer in anticipation of this very type of situation, and they had been trying to reach the property owner all winter to rent it again, or if possible buy it outright, but had no luck connecting with that person. Then this jerk shows up.

The neighboring landlord did this on purpose, for whatever reason.

Brian1972 on June 2, 2010 at 11:21 AM

IMO now that Palin has made this POS’s behavior public she should absolutely ignore him. Make no further comment on him or anything he does or says. If he does something legally inappropriate, call the police and file for a restraining order. Now he’s just doing what too many on the Left try to do – use Palin for publicity.

katiejane on June 2, 2010 at 11:24 AM

katiejane on June 2, 2010 at 11:24 AM

You are correct. She let the world know what he was up to, and it got him to whining and complaining almost immediately, which was revealing to say the least.

The episode with the Today Show going back on their word needed to be exposed, I think. The outrageous Nazi talk demanded a response also. Now, she has won a decisive PR victory, so the time is right to forget this a-hole and move back to promoting candidates and kicking Barry’s butt.

Only revisit this if he does something crazy and /or illegal, or if he caves and moves out early. Then one little goodbye, nice to know ya post would be in order.

Otherwise, let him stew in his own misery.

Brian1972 on June 2, 2010 at 11:30 AM

Let me see if I’ve got this lined up right– he accuses her of utilizing Nazi tactics, and then asks why she didn’t show up on his doorstep with a plate of welcome-to-the-neighborhood cookies.

drdilostues on June 2, 2010 at 11:51 AM

This clown could easily fit in the roster over at MSNBC.

adamsmith on June 2, 2010 at 11:53 AM

I just saw him on CNN. What a DB!

The sound was turned down so all I saw was the headline running below his fat face….”Palin declares war on journalist”

Is there any jounalistic integrity left anywhere? Stupid question, I know

Ditkaca on June 1, 2010 at 7:07 PM

“Palin declares war on journalist by forcing him to move across the country in the house next door to her.”

Oh wait, she didn’t?

OK: “Palin declares war on journalist by daring to post on Facebook that he moved in next door to her family and she doesn’t like it.”

That’s right, folks. Conservatives aren’t even supposed to be able to TALK.

Alana on June 2, 2010 at 12:09 PM

Why don’t you just say the Frontiersman acted stupidly.

Extrafishy on June 2, 2010 at 9:29 AM

Why? I thought the editorial was funny.

AnninCA on June 2, 2010

My comment was directed at Ed, not the editorial. I appreciated the humor in that.

Extrafishy on June 2, 2010 at 12:11 PM

Oh, kiss off, McGiniss. If ya can’t stand the heat, go back to wherever it was you dribbled in from.

mojo on June 2, 2010 at 12:30 PM

Oh, kiss off, McGiniss. If ya can’t stand the heat, go back to wherever it was you dribbled in from.

mojo on June 2, 2010 at 12:30 PM

That would be Massachusetts, if I’m not mistaken. (Apologies to the Bay Staters on HA — feel free to hate right back on Kaleefornya, as we certainly have it coming.)

Mary in LA on June 2, 2010 at 1:09 PM

You know, nothing in the world prohibits the Palins from purchasing the property from the current owners right now – then Joe would find himself Sarah’s tenant.

PJ Emeritus on June 2, 2010 at 1:52 PM

Alana 11:08 AM
Brian1972 11:21 AM

Yes, unsuccessful attempts were made, as if Palin could not have hired a firm to discreetly buy the property for her via an undisclosed name or for an undisclosed non-profit. Point being, though she had the goods, Palin didn’t want to fork out what it was that her crappy neighbor wanted in order to keep the peace via buy-out.

maverick muse on June 2, 2010 at 1:58 PM

Palin didn’t want to fork out what it was that her crappy neighbor wanted in order to keep the peace via buy-out.

maverick muse on June 2, 2010 at 1:58 PM

That is not what Palin said happened.

I’ll go with her version of these events, since, you know, she was there.

Brian1972 on June 2, 2010 at 2:08 PM

Where’s his scarf? Where’s his Martini glass?
What a punk.
Sad when what appears t’ be a man whines like that.

Army Brat on June 2, 2010 at 7:24 PM

I’m not calling Joe a pervert, but…”

MCGIRV on June 2, 2010 at 10:59 PM

Stalker

Wade on June 3, 2010 at 10:22 AM

Comment pages: 1 2 3