Another Porkulus fable in New Hampshire?
posted at 12:55 pm on May 26, 2010 by Ed Morrissey
Remember when Barack Obama put Joe Biden in charge of implementing the stimulus package, because “no one messes with Joe”? Apparently someone has been messing with Joe, or at least feeding him and the White House the wrong numbers. A month ago, the Obama administration announced that it had “saved or created” over 12,000 jobs in New Hampshire through its Porkulus spending as a way of helping Democrats campaign for re-election:
The White House estimates the federal economic stimulus package has saved or created 12,000 jobs in New Hampshire, but also admits the figure is speculative.
The estimate, released Friday by President Obama’s Council of Economic Advisers, shows the White House could be within striking range of its initial prediction that stimulus money would create or save 16,000 jobs in the Granite State. …
In January, the stimulus office reported that as of December, if all stimulus money had been paid out only to people working 40 hours a week over a full year, then the equivalent of 2,021 jobs had been created.
The White House touted its new estimates as proof that the $787 billion stimulus package has put people to work and helped resuscitate the staggering economy.
“From tax cuts to construction projects, the Recovery Act is now firing on all cylinders when it comes to creating jobs and putting Americans back to work,” Vice President Joe Biden wrote in a statement.
A month later, the Recovery.gov website tells a different story:
The actual reported “saved or created” jobs in New Hampshire come to a little over 10% of what Biden and the White House claimed. In almost 1100 awards through Porkulus, the bureau tracking the “saved or created” jobs across the country could only find 1432 jobs, or 1.31 jobs per award. The amount of Porkulus money spent in New Hampshire is more than $772 million, which means that the cost of saving or creating each job documented through Recovery.gov comes to $539,248.29.
The State of New Hampshire’s numbers are much closer to the Recovery.gov website than previous White House claims. They show 2,223 jobs saved or created through Porkulus, which makes the investment in each job only $347,370.02. A bargain!
Needless to say, Democrats like Paul Hodes and Carol Shea-Porter, who voted for Porkulus, will have to account for the lack of impact this bill has had in New Hampshire. Had this money been put to use by the private sector, it would have created a lot more than 1432 jobs, and would have also created actual economic growth. One of the Republicans vying to challenge Shea-Porter, Sean Mahoney, wants an audit of how the money is being spent:
“When three different government entities report widely disparate jobs figures after spending the same enormous pot of money, it’s time for the politicians to start answering questions. Especially politicians like Carol Shea-Porter who voted for this debacle,” Mahoney continued.
Last month the Obama administration’s Council of Economic Advisers released a report claiming the stimulus has created 12,000 jobs in New Hampshire. Meanwhile, Recovery.gov, the website set up by President Obama allegedly to “root out waste, inefficiency and unnecessary spending in our government” estimates the stimulus has created only 1,432 jobs. On Wednesday, the New Hampshire Office of Economic Recovery released its jobs report for the first quarter of 2010 estimating the stimulus created 2,223 jobs to date.
“Carol Shea-Porter voted for the stimulus spending bill with all manner of promises about transparency and job creation. We’re slowly finding out both those promises were empty,” Mahoney stated. “It would be tempting to chalk this up to just another Washington politician’s phony rhetoric. But we’re talking about almost a trillion dollars in taxpayers’ money.”
“The Government Accountability Office needs to audit the stimulus law. They need to come clean as to where our money went. They didn’t spend it creating the jobs they promised. And they are flouting their own standards or transparency and accountability,” Mahoney continued. “Carol Shea-Porter is plugged in to the powers that be in Washington. She would be wise to be the first elected politician to call for an audit of stimulus spending.”
It’s worse than that, Sean. Someone is messing with Joe Biden! Or, more likely, Biden and this administration are messing with us.
Related Posts:
Breaking on Hot Air


Bobby Jindal: Paternalistic, big-government liberalism is the biggest loser here

Super Nannies: EU bans olive oils, Germany ponders Autobahn speed limit







Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
As I just posted HotairLib has their whole head up their six o clock.
hamradio on May 24, 2013 at 2:43 PM
Who wrote the speech? Or are you just praising the messenger?
mixplix on May 24, 2013 at 2:57 PM
Connect the dots: journolist meeting by invitation only at the White House on, what Tuesday?, “big”speech by Obama on Thursday, lame stream media fawning over speech on Friday. Who would have seen that coming, huh?
parke on May 24, 2013 at 2:58 PM
They need the “war on terror” in order to further erode our Constitutional freedoms and to deflect criticism from the administration’s and Federal government’s ongoing corruption.
They are just trying to massage it so that they don’t offend the Muslims, international Libtards and their own sensibilities anymore than necessary.
A few Muslim terrorists here and there are quite expendable to this Administration despite their sympathies for them. These drone attacks also do much deflect any potential criticism that the Administration is weak in dealing with such matters.
Dr. ZhivBlago on May 24, 2013 at 2:59 PM
MSNBC is nothing but a left wing propaganda machine serving their master, Obama.
rplat on May 24, 2013 at 3:07 PM
I believe that he was officially nominated 10 days after he was sworn in. Wow! The WON really worked long hours that week and a half to earn that POS medal. During those ten days he ordered NO DRONE STRIKES to keep his peaceful record clean.
fred5678 on May 24, 2013 at 3:22 PM
Obama: Don’t worry about that Ben Ghazi guy. I killed Bin Laden, and Bush didn’t!
And Obummer still wants to close Gitmo? Good luck with that–not even Upchuck Schumer was willing to hold trials in New York!
Steve Z on May 24, 2013 at 3:24 PM
They just changed the definition of terrorist. They used to be jihadis from the Middle East–now they’re Minutemen in Arizona and Tea Partiers in Ohio.
Steve Z on May 24, 2013 at 3:29 PM
Erika, sometimes your writing shows signs of rivaling even the Master of Snark himself, Allahpundit. Good work!
KS Rex on May 24, 2013 at 3:45 PM
I love how crazy Al invoked the Nobel Peace Prize in praise of a speech that spoke about dropping bombs on people’s head. Maybe it was the “fewer” bombs than before that raised this to historic levels.
Do they even know or care that they are morons.
marnes on May 24, 2013 at 3:46 PM
His speech made less sense than Bluto’s Animal House Speech and was far less entertaining. Nothing less than base rallying time. Never thought I would say this, but Code Pink was the best part.
DDay on May 24, 2013 at 4:01 PM
Sperling posted this at the Examiner on May 23 about this “historic speech of Obysmal’s:
You see, we are just not working hard enough to “work with the Muslim American community” who are a “fundamental part of the American family.” Watch out, too, because Obysmal is again trying to limit the impact of the Internet.
onlineanalyst on May 24, 2013 at 4:22 PM
That Chris Hayes is a bit of a twink, isn’t he?
onlineanalyst on May 24, 2013 at 4:25 PM
Obama apparently gave two speeches yesterday and I watched the other one.
myiq2xu on May 24, 2013 at 5:03 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2