The Hill: ObamaCare tax credits discourage hiring

posted at 11:36 am on May 24, 2010 by Ed Morrissey

Gee, who would have guessed it?  Actually, this point has been repeatedly made here and elsewhere — that the tax credits for small businesses in ObamaCare not only won’t expand coverage, but will actively slow hiring and business growth.  It’s still good to see confirmation from other sources:

A study by the National Center for Policy Analysis shows that tax credits in the new healthcare law could negatively impact small-business hiring decisions.

The new law provides a 50 percent tax credit to companies offering health coverage that have fewer than 10 workers who, on average, earn $25,000 a year. The tax credit is reduced as more employees are added to the payroll. …

Using insurance premium cost projections supplied by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the study states that the credit reaches its optimal point at 13 workers, with relief peaking at $36,400 for qualifying business.

After the 13th worker the economics surrounding the credit change, the study says.

For employers with 15 workers, taking on an additional hire will reduce the credit by $1,400. For a company looking to expand from 20 to 21 workers, the credit will shrink by $3,733. And businesses will take a $5,600 reduction on the credit when hiring the 25th worker.

The credit phases out for companies with at least 26 employees.

The real issue is that these tax credits won’t incentivize either hiring or employer-provided health coverage, and for one good reason — they’re only good for a couple of years:

The tax credits are available to businesses until 2016, two years after the healthcare exchanges are up and running. In 2016, of the 159 million Americans that participate in employer-sponsored health plans, only 3 million will be eligible for the tax credits provided to their employer, the CBO predicts.

Small businesses running on thin margins won’t suddenly decide to buy health insurance for their employees just to get a tax credit for a couple of years.  The expiration of the credit means that the expenditure on health insurance has to make sense without the tax credits.  If it made sense without the credits, most small businesses would already have provided it to their employees.  Furthermore, the credit itself doesn’t come close to covering the cost of health insurance even while in effect, nor do other small-business tax credits offered by the Obama administration cover the cost of hiring new personnel.

These tax credits will only apply to those businesses that already offer health insurance as part of their attempt to compete for labor in the market.  The expiration of the credit and the establishment of federally-subsidized state health insurance exchanges will incentivize these employers to abandon its provision of health insurance to its employees.  Most of these will pay no fines for dumping employees out of their plans, and since other employers will likely be doing the same thing, they won’t have to worry about competition any longer in benefits options.

Barack Obama and the Democrats in Congress clearly have little understanding of real-world economics.  If any of them had run a business, or perhaps just worked for a while in the private sector, they would have understood that the incentives included in ObamaCare actually reward the opposite behavior they intended.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

No sh!t Sherlock!

Brian1972 on May 24, 2010 at 11:38 AM

If any of them had run a business, or perhaps just worked for a while in the private sector, they would have understood that the incentives included in ObamaCare actually reward the opposite behavior they intended.

but they studied so hard, and many of them went to harvard and had latte’s at 1000am everyday pontificating about the evils of the world. Surely all of that mental midgetry can save us….!

ted c on May 24, 2010 at 11:41 AM

Are you saying that the government is pushing small businesses to go Galt?

Dhuka on May 24, 2010 at 11:41 AM

The system worked!

trs on May 24, 2010 at 11:41 AM

Next scheduled event: Waxman calls for congressional investigation of the National Center for Policy Analysis….

apostic on May 24, 2010 at 11:42 AM

And in another study, scientists have determined that the sun rises in the east and sets in the west.

Also, water is wet.

rbj on May 24, 2010 at 11:42 AM

The expiration of the credit and the establishment of federally-subsidized state health insurance exchanges will incentivize these employers to abandon its provision of health insurance to its employees.

And with the cost of premiums skyrocketing and private insurers eventually being driven out of business, that’ll leave these people with only one place to turn for their health coverage: the federal government. Gee, it’s almost like this was all done on purpose.

Doughboy on May 24, 2010 at 11:42 AM

Gee, it’s almost like this was all done on purpose.

Doughboy on May 24, 2010 at 11:42 AM

I wonder how the hell that happened./

ted c on May 24, 2010 at 11:45 AM

The other side is that it discourages raises as well. If your average is already near $25,000/worker, you have a vested interest not to give raises – or terminate those that ask – and get a lower priced worker in his place.

lorien1973 on May 24, 2010 at 11:46 AM

Cue the “greedy businesses clinging bitterly to profits and working their employees to death rather than hiring more workers” lecture.

ya2daup on May 24, 2010 at 11:46 AM

Let me get my “surprised look” ready. :>0

DuctTapeMyBrain on May 24, 2010 at 11:46 AM

If any of them had run a business, or perhaps just worked for a while in the private sector, they would have understood that the incentives included in ObamaCare actually reward the opposite behavior they intended.

I have to disagree with this thought. They knew exactly what they were doing here. This is their route to single-payer government run healthcare. They are not stupid, they are dangerous and doing their best to forever change our Constitutional-federal republic into a progressive/socialist country.

truetexan on May 24, 2010 at 11:47 AM

I don’t see why people are confused.

When you look at the goals the major players in DC already admitted, you see that these perverse incentives are a feature, not a bug.

OBQuiet on May 24, 2010 at 11:47 AM

ObamaCare success by design. Musn’t let a crises (even purposely created ones) go to waste.

Terri on May 24, 2010 at 11:49 AM

Rasmussen reports that 63% of Americans want Obamacare repealed.

kingsjester on May 24, 2010 at 11:50 AM

Wow, this is unheard of. The government punishing businesses for growing?

It is almost as insane as the government discouraging people to better themselves and earn more.

Thank goodness our government isn’t so incompetent as to do these things :o/

cntrlfrk on May 24, 2010 at 11:51 AM

“The loss of growth in American Small businesses will capture the imagination of the world”

-BO

batterup on May 24, 2010 at 11:51 AM

Liberals are adamant about ensuring ensuring subsistence–but only subsistence–for as many Americans as possible. Look what liberals have done for blacks since the mid-1960s.

The GOP needs to run on a platform that excoriates the Dems as the party of the plantation economy with the political class as our slaveowners and their favorites acting as our overseers.

BuckeyeSam on May 24, 2010 at 11:52 AM

As soon as I hear the term “tax credit”, I know there are problems.

At best, “tax credits” distort markets and temporarily disguise problems (like the home buyer tax credit).

Or worse, some tax credits clearly make the situation worse, and do the opposite of what they are supposed to do, like the small business HC “tax credits”.

Or the very worst, they are simply vehicles for welfare and redistribution, such as “income tax credits” that go to people who pay no Federal Income tax to begin with.

And to top it all off, the State Run Media go around calling these abominations “tax cuts”.

forest on May 24, 2010 at 11:52 AM

Unexpectedly?

/

Sekhmet on May 24, 2010 at 11:52 AM

Repeal this obamanation of a grecian style “benefit”. Why do we, as a people, even put up with this? At what pecentage point does the government listen to them what hires ‘em? VOTE in November!

Deckard on May 24, 2010 at 11:53 AM

It takes a special kind of stupid .. Obama Doesn’t Care

J_Crater on May 24, 2010 at 11:54 AM

What’s funny is that it might be in our individual best interests if health care benefits weren’t provided by our employeres. But instead of having an honest conversation about ways to move control of health care spending into our homes, Obama is setting up a situation in which he can blame businesses for trying to turn a profit.

hawksruleva on May 24, 2010 at 11:54 AM

OBQuiet on May 24, 2010 at 11:47 AM

DING! DING! DING!

We have a winner, folks!

CPT. Charles on May 24, 2010 at 11:54 AM

Obama said the premiums per household would go down by $2,500. I knew he was wrong when he said it. Can someone show a case where premiums went down? Just one?

seven on May 24, 2010 at 11:54 AM

To repeat an old quote [w/paraphrasing]:

‘We’ll get jobs when they lose theirs.’

CPT. Charles on May 24, 2010 at 11:56 AM

Barack Obama and the Democrats in Congress clearly have little understanding of real-world economics.

That’s because all their planning comes from the Book of Obamanomics. There’s even a section about ‘free energy’ from multi-colored unicorns.

GarandFan on May 24, 2010 at 11:57 AM

Why do people, like the author of this article, still assume that the government that imposed this monstrosity on the American public had good intentions? The article points out a natural consequence of Obamacare. Why does that the people who pushed this legislation, haters of America, did it benevolently?

GaltBlvnAtty on May 24, 2010 at 11:58 AM

Who knew? Oh yeah, we did!

petunia on May 24, 2010 at 11:58 AM

It has been shown time and time again just on the blog, liberals can’t do simple math…let alone applying math to real situations.
Not the leaders know exactly what they are doing…but the liberal sheep have no idea, even the simplest math problem.

right2bright on May 24, 2010 at 12:01 PM

Renowned Community Organizer not as smart as advertised.

Bishop on May 24, 2010 at 12:01 PM

And in another study, scientists have determined that the sun rises in the east and sets in the west.

Also, water is wet.

rbj on May 24, 2010 at 11:42 AM

And CO2 causes it all! It is either CO2 or Bush. I’m not sure.

At any rate we are all doomed.

petunia on May 24, 2010 at 12:01 PM

Barack Obama and the Democrats in Congress clearly have little understanding of real-world economics.

I am getting tired of blaming this on Democrats. I am ready to go totally Politically incorrect and blame voters 100%. If 50% + 1 voters choose to elect politicians that want to spend spend spend and believe that an entitlement society can survive long term, than that is the problem. Not the ones that get elected.

WashJeff on May 24, 2010 at 12:02 PM

WashJeff on May 24, 2010 at 12:02 PM

I agree. It is time WE start taking responsibility for our choices.

truetexan on May 24, 2010 at 12:04 PM

So, in the long run, might this be a good thing. Conservatives have long wished for a disconnect between insurance and employment. Getting your insurance at work discourages labor mobility and reduces the relationship between the healthcare recipient and healthcare’s costs.

Could breaking this bond be a good first step toward a stronger individual insurance market.

Of course, it would mean a jettisoning of much of Obamacare to get there, but the public very much wants Obamacare overturned, and might just get it.

HakerA on May 24, 2010 at 12:06 PM

“Unexpectedly”, of course.

MikeA on May 24, 2010 at 12:08 PM

I agree. It is time WE start taking responsibility for our choices.

truetexan on May 24, 2010 at 12:04 PM

I hope you all can at least hold down Fort Texas!

WashJeff on May 24, 2010 at 12:10 PM

“Obama Signs Memorandum Raising Fuel Standards”

Regulating us into financial ruin. Can’t get the people to vote for it so the Pres… just writes a memo. Presto it’s law.

I am certain this is not what self-government is all about.

petunia on May 24, 2010 at 12:10 PM

Couple that last part with the statistic I heard somewhere that only 8% of Obama’s administration has ever even worked in private industry.

Eight. Percent.

Youngs98 on May 24, 2010 at 12:11 PM

“If any of them had run a business, or perhaps just worked for a while in the private sector, they would have understood that the incentives included in ObamaCare actually reward the opposite behavior they intended.”

Ahem, actually Ed it has the exact intention they want. The progressive plan is one built around syndcalism,…..

Syndicalism, for those not familiar, is one member of the family of pre-arranged economies, and is the off-spring born of Socialism and Communism if you like. Syndicalism relies on trade unions as the basis of social structure, it is explained by wordiq.com as “A model syndicalist community is as follows. The local unit, the syndicat, would communicate with other syndicats through the bourse de travail (labour exchange). The bourse would handle management and the transfer of commodities.” Sounds strikingly similar to how Obama and the Democrats want to set up a “Health Care Exchange,” does it not?

Syndicalism requires that everyone eventually winds up in a unionized large corporation to work. Small Biz’s are too hard to track and incapable of sustaining a unionized work force.

This why global giants like Sachs, Morgan, BofA and the rest were bailed out and the CIT group who was underwriting 70% of all American small biz loans wasn’t. Take a look up & down main street, mom & pop operations are shuttering their doors right and left while giants li8ke Walmart readily embrace Obamacare. As each new policy from team O comes into play we are only going to see the acceleration of small biz’s closing and further conglomeration into bigger and bigger entities.

Obama & Co know exactly what they are doing and all is going as planned. He doesn’t seek re-election, he doesn’t want anymore elections, if he gets his way 2010 will be the last free and fair election in the US.

Archimedes on May 24, 2010 at 12:12 PM

This makes perfect sense in Obamastan.

bloviator on May 24, 2010 at 12:15 PM

Couple that last part with the statistic I heard somewhere that only 8% of Obama’s administration has ever even worked in private industry.

Eight. Percent.

Youngs98 on May 24, 2010 at 12:11 PM

And regarding the other 92%, how many of them have spent most of their careers in positions that amount to nothing more than seeking to take money from some and giving it to others.

BuckeyeSam on May 24, 2010 at 12:17 PM

The main problem as I see it, regarding voting for leaders who will actually grow our economy rather than devastate it with their grasping and their idiocy, is that we are mis-educating our children.

People subsisting as wards of the state on government entitlements; civil servants including teachers who pass on their economic illiteracy; union members running roughshod and soaking us for their cadillac wages & benefits that bear no relation to the actual work they do; illegal aliens; and children — these people by and large support Economic Fantasyland, and vote for it if they are old enough, year in and year out.

The Dems are aware of this and are doing their level best to expand the population of all of these categories of Americans.

I had an argument with an “educator” who could not comprehend the difference between a “tax credit” and a “tax cut.” I also had to go to great pains to explain the difference between “profit” (a concept hated by liberals” and “profit margin.”

Is it any wonder that the goose that laid the golden egg is being killed, and angrily so, by the socialists doofuses who have their hands on the controls in America today?

Edouard on May 24, 2010 at 12:19 PM

And we sink further into the O-cession.

BobMbx on May 24, 2010 at 12:20 PM

“At some point, I do think you’ve made enough money” -BHO

I guess that point is when you have 13 people working for you.

NickelAndDime on May 24, 2010 at 12:22 PM

If any of them had run a business, or perhaps just worked for a while in the private sector, they would have understood that the incentives included in ObamaCare actually reward the opposite behavior they intended.

Dude, if any of them had just taken a basic undergrad course in economics, they’d understand this. Or if they’d just read the first chapter of “Freakonomics.” These people are so far-removed from reality and so out of touch with human nature, it’s breathtaking.

NoLeftTurn on May 24, 2010 at 12:23 PM

If they can have a shadow govmint we can have a shadow economy. Free people and free markets always find a way around what a govmint imposes.

Kissmygrits on May 24, 2010 at 12:24 PM

“At some point, I do think you’ve made enough money” -BHO

Maybe he found a missing page from the Constitution, where it says “the Presidents’ opinions of life, the Universe, and everything are the true laws of the United States.”

That clause certainly isn’t in my copy……

BobMbx on May 24, 2010 at 12:25 PM

Every time I see that picture I can’t help but feel that they’re laughing at us.

crazy_legs on May 24, 2010 at 12:25 PM

“Barack Obama and the Democrats in Congress clearly have little understanding of real-world economics.”

yes they do.

They are making very effective use of that knowledge to destroy the economy and the country.

notagool on May 24, 2010 at 12:25 PM

I hate to go lawyer on you, but the solution is easy. Set up a bunch of corporations with legal zoom dot com or whatever and each corporation hires 13 employees. A work force of 130 could be spread across 10 corporations each one maximizing the tax credit.

tommylotto on May 24, 2010 at 12:27 PM

It is almost as insane as the government discouraging people to better themselves and earn more.

cntrlfrk on May 24, 2010 at 11:51 AM

You must be talking about Nancy Skankmouth.

docflash on May 24, 2010 at 12:28 PM

Why do democrats think that bureaucrats are they smartest people in the world? This is another example that free markets are better than demand economies. Adam Smith’s invisible hand is better prepared to make economic decision than politicians, staffers and bureaucrats!

EliTheBean on May 24, 2010 at 12:30 PM

but they studied so hard, and many of them went to harvard and had latte’s at 1000am everyday pontificating about the evils of the world Amerikkka. Surely all of that mental midgetry can save us….!

ted c on May 24, 2010 at 11:41 AM

FIFY.

AZCoyote on May 24, 2010 at 12:36 PM

perfect picture Ed….

cmsinaz on May 24, 2010 at 12:37 PM

EliTheBean on May 24, 2010 at 12:30 PM

I would love to take Adam Smith’s invisible hand and bitch slap Obama, Reid and Skeletor Pelosi!

search4truth on May 24, 2010 at 12:43 PM

This is what happens when Socialists, Economic Illiterates and Fools run a Nation. This current Regime has created more problems that can be solved by the next two generations of Americans. Everything that they meddle with gets broken.

Now, go out today and thank the 53% of Your Friends and Neighbors that empowered these idiots.

old trooper2 on May 24, 2010 at 12:46 PM

Barack Obama and the Democrats in Congress clearly have little understanding of real-world economics.

No, they understand perfectly what they are doing. This is all according to plan.

Missy on May 24, 2010 at 12:47 PM

I blame this on the ten percent of Obama’s administration that had real world private sector experience.

jukin on May 24, 2010 at 12:48 PM

I looked into it for my small family business. The credit is not available to anyone who is a relative of the owners.

We downsized to just the two of us and were forced to lay off the rest of our staff among them our son and nephew.
I would love to hire them back when things improve ( if ever) but since they are family we are not able to take advantage of the credit to give us a break for even a short period of time.

For the record we paid for full family benefits for our entire staff prior to the recession
( medical, dental, optical, rx).

Now with our small group ( 2) with an average age of 55 our premiums are over $550.00mo each for just major med.

Another dagger in the heart of small family business from the LIAR in Chief and his Congressional followers.

silvercreeklady on May 24, 2010 at 1:12 PM

So, today I need to:
Split my company in two (or 3, or 4);
Split employee time/salary between the entities;
undo in three years?

tomg51 on May 24, 2010 at 1:14 PM

Barack Obama and the Democrats in Congress clearly have little understanding of real-world economics. If any of them had run a business, or perhaps just worked for a while in the private sector, they would have understood that the incentives included in ObamaCare actually reward the opposite behavior they intended.

No, exactly what they intended – everybody on the dole.

PastorJon on May 24, 2010 at 1:18 PM

Wow, this is unheard of. The government punishing businesses for growing?

The current Communist Party USA platform is not so open on this, but their 1997 platform was quite clear about the goal of destroying the large corporations through green inititives and bankrupting burdens and replacing them with small manufactors, businesses and co-ops. Looks like they are doing exactly what they have been wanting to do for decades, which interestingly, was to be spearheaded by a national health program.

Obama was raised by communist grandparents, mentored by a Moscow appointed leader of the Communist party USA for more than ten years from the age of nine, trained and influenced by the most powerful socialist in our nation and put into office by socialist organizations; most prominently by ACORN of whom the former leader has recently proudly declared her strong socialist beliefs.

With that background and support, is there any question as to Obama and his minions intentions?

Under communism in the Soviet Union; factories were owned by the state; Small businesses operated under the rules and dictations of the state; everyone worked for the state and engaged in free interprize through risk of their freedom and bribes. Only the those in postions of elite status had the advantages of choice and profits.

Franklyn on May 24, 2010 at 1:56 PM

But their heart was in the right place. What else is of any imprtance to a liberal?

Fred 2 on May 24, 2010 at 1:59 PM

They know exactly what they’re doing and they don’t care who knows.

Torch on May 24, 2010 at 3:00 PM

tax credits are liberal social policy disguised as tax cuts

bobnox on May 24, 2010 at 5:24 PM