Pakistani Army officer arrested in connection to Shahzad
posted at 11:37 am on May 19, 2010 by Ed Morrissey
The case of the “lone wolf” bombing attempt in Times Square became even more complicated yesterday with the arrest of a Pakistani Army officer. An army major apparently helped Faisal Shahzad get to and from a terrorist training camp in Pakistan. The connection offers a troubling look at the complicated relationship between the Pakistani Taliban and the security forces of the Muslim nation:
Investigators have arrested a Pakistani army major linked to the prime suspect in the botched attempt to bomb New York City’s Times Square early this month, Pakistani law enforcement sources said Tuesday.
The major’s involvement with suspect Faisal Shahzad, who was arrested at John F. Kennedy International Airport as he attempted to fly to Dubai, United Arab Emirates, remains unclear. Law enforcement sources said the major had met Shahzad, a naturalized U.S. citizen of Pakistani descent, in Islamabad, the capital, and was in cellphone contact with him.
The major’s arrest marks the first time someone in Pakistan’s military establishment has been directly linked to the case. The sources would not say when the alleged meeting and phone calls between Shahzad and the major took place, or what was discussed. They spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak about the investigation.
The initial spin on this attack keeps disintegrating on further inspection. Clearly this was a well-supported conspiracy that involved a much wider variety of members than the Obama administration suggested in its initial responses. It also makes it harder to let American counterterrorism efforts off the hook for missing Shahzad. Surely having a recently naturalized US citizen from Pakistan meeting with the Pakistani military and slipping away to North Waziristan for a long period of time should have captured someone’s notice — especially the repeated cell-phone calls?
And once again, it demonstrates that the Pakistani military represents a threat of its own to some degree. This isn’t just some disaffected lance corporal offering material support to the Taliban. Someone of this rank would have access to plenty of resources to undermine our efforts against the Taliban on both sides of the border. Where was the ISI in this, too? Did they not detect this plot, or did they not care to detect this plot and others? The Taliban was once their client, and some have suggested that they want to re-establish that relationship for the day when the US pulls out of the theater. How many other army officers are providing material support to the Taliban — and to plots against the US?









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Yes, but how does the Pakistani Army officer feel about healthcare?
RobCon on May 19, 2010 at 11:39 AM
(wolf)
blatantblue on May 19, 2010 at 11:41 AM
But, did Shahzad indicate any hostility to Obamacare while talking to that Pakistani Army officer? Holder wants to know.
RBMN on May 19, 2010 at 11:41 AM
Lone Wolf III- The saga continues…
Fletch54 on May 19, 2010 at 11:42 AM
Does this Pakistani Army major favor only moderate Taliban or the more radical ones?
Liam on May 19, 2010 at 11:44 AM
MSNBC is reporting that the Pak officer recently had his house foreclosed, and that may have led to his actions.
Bishop on May 19, 2010 at 11:45 AM
If anyone here thinks that Pakistan actually wants to help the US battle these guys, you are sadly mistaken. They only want to keep the Taliban from blowing up and taking over their own country.
Johnnyreb on May 19, 2010 at 11:46 AM
Curiouser and curiouser, is there anyone that can unravel the web of deceit being conducted by Pakistan, the state department,department of defense, or homeland security? NSA, the CIA and every other alphabet soup organization is failing.
fourdeucer on May 19, 2010 at 11:47 AM
Let’s not jump to conclusions about a Muslim Pakistani who travels to Taliban controlled areas. It’s not like he’s a racist homophobic Tea Partier, or a cop who acts stupidly.
rbj on May 19, 2010 at 11:49 AM
Lone wolves. Acting alone. Together.
ROCnPhilly on May 19, 2010 at 11:49 AM
Why would a Paskistani army officer be angry about OboobaCare?
Akzed on May 19, 2010 at 11:54 AM
Doh!
Akzed on May 19, 2010 at 11:55 AM
So, the Tea Party is active in Pokiston….
d1carter on May 19, 2010 at 11:55 AM
What do you mean “was once their client”?
I thought it was well understood the ISI and the Paki military have been playing both sides of the board against each other the whole time.
That has seemed pretty clear to me, at least.
Brian1972 on May 19, 2010 at 11:59 AM
It’s that darn Arizona law driving these misunderstood, totally non-terroristic people to take such desperate measures…I just know it!
atlgal on May 19, 2010 at 12:01 PM
I’m shocked, shocked I tell you that a Pakistani military officer would help a disgruntled American commit a terrorist act. Neither of course were Muslim or motivated by Islamic theology, because suggesting that would obviously be racist, intolerant or insensitive or something.
doriangrey on May 19, 2010 at 12:04 PM
So,its a RightWing Terrorist Talibany Tea Partier,eh!!(sarc)
canopfor on May 19, 2010 at 12:05 PM
I’m shocked, shocked I tell you that a Pakistani military officer would help a disgruntled American commit a terrorist act. Neither of course were Muslim or motivated by Islamic theology, because suggesting that would obviously be racist, intolerant or insensitive or something.
doriangrey on May 19, 2010 at 12:04 PM
doriangrey: Thats Pure Crazy talk,you need Holder to
straighten you out!!:)
canopfor on May 19, 2010 at 12:07 PM
Rush is beginning is Assault!
canopfor on May 19, 2010 at 12:07 PM
UGH,his,not is!
canopfor on May 19, 2010 at 12:08 PM
When’s the last time someone counted Paki’s nukes?
Akzed on May 19, 2010 at 12:09 PM
Where was the ISI in this, too? Did they not detect this plot, or did they not care to detect this plot and others?
Whats the next question Ed? does Santa Claus exist?? inquring minds would like to know.
The Taliban was once their client, and some have suggested that they want to re-establish that relationship for the day when the US pulls out of the theater.
You assume that their relationship ended post 9/11 – that would be a pretty bad assumption.
How many other army officers are providing material support to the Taliban — and to plots against the US?
As an Indian, i shake my head when reading stuff like this.Ed, this has been happening for the last 9 years – how do you think the Taliban survived after the invasion ?
Why do you think the Mumbai attacks happened ? They were orchestrated by the ISI hoping to pull India into a war with Pakistan, there by easing the American pressure on Pakis/Taliban.
I am pretty sure that Pakistan will “arrest” all the culprits, if you guys gave them another billion dollars.
nagee76 on May 19, 2010 at 12:13 PM
eye roll.
How about we just admit that there is no such thing as a Muslim lone wolf?
ORconservative on May 19, 2010 at 12:16 PM
No probs , bin laden is doing it as we speak.
the_nile on May 19, 2010 at 12:17 PM
Only to let them go after a short while and then ask for yet another couple of billion more.
Johnnyreb on May 19, 2010 at 12:17 PM
Where was the ISI in this, too? Did they not detect this plot, or did they not care to detect this plot and others?
nagee76 on May 19, 2010 at 12:13 PM
nagee76:)
================================
http://www.defence.pk/forums/general-defence/551-isi-pakistan-inter-services-intelligence.html
canopfor on May 19, 2010 at 12:27 PM
The question is whether they conceived the plot themselves or just turned a blind eye toward it. The ISI has been playing the US for patsies since forever. They are dealing from the bottom, the middle, and the top of the deck, and from their sleeves as well.
hillbillyjim on May 19, 2010 at 12:35 PM
Ed, please start using Shahzad’s mug shot on the front page (it’s finally available)
Brat on May 19, 2010 at 12:37 PM
Sounds like Hillary Clinton knew something was up, otherwise why would she say this?:
Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, while stressing that Islamabad was being cooperative in probing the Times Square bombing, said in an interview aired Sunday that if a successful terrorist attack was traced back to Pakistan, the country would face “very severe consequences.”
OxyCon on May 19, 2010 at 12:38 PM
Yup, very serious indeed, Obama might send them a very sternly worded letter just before apologizing for America’s involvement in enforcing American sovereignty.
doriangrey on May 19, 2010 at 12:42 PM
Just one paki officer arrested ? Just one ? Just one officer was involved ?
They do think we are stupid, don’t they ?
macncheez on May 19, 2010 at 12:49 PM
Well, we did elect Obama….
doriangrey on May 19, 2010 at 12:51 PM
@OxyCon,
Hillary was making an empty threat – what exactly would the United States have done if the Times Square bomb went off ? Take on the Paki Army/ISI ?? Let me guess…..a few more whackamole Drone attacks.
Just a day before that meaningless threat, the US released about 500 million dollars to the Pakis – nothing says “I am going to kick your ass” to the Pakis like giving them a pot of gold.
At this point the Pakistani state has become a toxic asset that is “just too big to fail”.
And for people who may not know or have already forgotten the terrorist’s father is a retired Air Vice Marshal in the Paki airforce.
nagee76 on May 19, 2010 at 12:56 PM
Someone should tell this Administration that Wolves travel in packs.
- The Cat
P.S. This may be why Pakistan is not sharing info yet. Still rooting out the conspirators. Prolly cleaning out the cancer within their own government.
Jack Bhabra is on the case.
P.P.S. All names are fictional and any resemblance to real persons is coincidental. But should you meet Bauer’s Pakistani counterpart Jack Bahbra, I’d start talking right away.
MirCat on May 19, 2010 at 1:18 PM
What he said. I am sick of looking at Shahzad’s publicity stills.
scrubjay on May 19, 2010 at 1:19 PM
OBAMA ADMINISTRATION HOMEBOY SECURITY TERROR CHECKLIST:
US Military vet? Nope, check
Christian? Nope, check
White?, nope, check
States rights activist?, nope, check
Tea Party member? nope, check
…I dunno, we’ve pretty much exhausted all possible indicators, he looks pretty clean to me.
Alden Pyle on May 19, 2010 at 1:27 PM
What he said! Mugshot, not Smugshot!
Maquis on May 19, 2010 at 1:39 PM
How did this trained and well connected terrorist manage to screw it up so badly?
I’m telling you something does not add up big time.
TheBigOldDog on May 19, 2010 at 1:42 PM
CIA plot to root out terror elements here and in Pakistan? Set up a fake training camp, give out wrong information, and let things happen?
Curious point you make, that two terror plots failed because of ‘ineptitude’.
To indulge a conspiracy theory, though believing it myself, it could be disinformation to lull us, that we think the enemy is inept. Then might come a successful strike.
It is odd, to be sure, but our enemy will never stop trying. Knowing that, we must never let our guard down. Though, I dread, this Administration will lower its readiness. It already is, being willing to support Hezbollah ‘moderates’.
To me, that’s like giving a 13-year-old to a pederast who prefers 12-year-olds, so he (hopefully) won’t go after pre-teens. Either way, it’s molestation.
We live in sick, demented times. All what is wrong, far as I’m concerned, is rooted in this current Administration in particular, and the Democrat Party in general.
Liam on May 19, 2010 at 2:08 PM
though NOT believing it myself, that is…
Liam on May 19, 2010 at 2:09 PM
“How many other army officers are providing material support to the Taliban — and to plots against the US?”
I’d say the majority of them are complicit.
I’d also say that our ‘military aid’ cash going there is most likely being used– at least a good part of it– against us. So, by that we are paying to train and terrorize ourselves….
Proof: how much of that ‘aid’ goes into funding the ISI?
Dick Turpin on May 19, 2010 at 2:17 PM
Perhaps Shahzad’s activity was missed because that section of the counterterriorism group was busy working on climate change.
Oleta on May 19, 2010 at 2:26 PM