Scandal-tainted Democratic Rep. Mollohan out in primary loss
posted at 8:48 am on May 12, 2010 by Ed Morrissey
Advocates for clean government may cheer. Democrats may breathe a sigh of relief. Republicans may have a tougher time in November winning the seat in West Virginia. Everyone can agree, however, that the ousting of Rep. Alan Mollohan (D-WV) in the Democratic primary represents a victory for the cleansing nature of representative government:
A West Virginia congressional seat that’s been held by a Democrat for generations is now up for grabs after 14-term incumbent Rep. Alan Mollohan was swept out of office on a wave of voter unrest that an opponent called a referendum on President Barack Obama.
The congressman is the first U.S. House incumbent to be ousted this spring primary season amid widespread anti-incumbent sentiment. The same unrest helped end the 17-year career of Utah Republican Sen. Bob Bennett, who lost a GOP convention on Saturday.
State Sen. Michael Oliverio carried 56 percent of the vote to Mollohan’s 44 percent Tuesday night after an aggressive campaign that questioned the incumbent’s ethics and support for issues including federal health care reform.
It didn’t question Mollohan’s ethics. The primary fight exposed his lack of same. Mollohan has long been under investigation by federal law enforcement for corruption. The House Ethics Committee recently acknowledged that they had an open probe into his actions as well — until the Justice Department asked them to shut it down to keep it from interfering with their own case-building.
That’s not the only reason Mollohan lost, however. The people of West Virginia depend on coal for their economy, and Mollohan has betrayed them repeatedly over the last year. He has played along with Nancy Pelosi and Barack Obama as they have attempted to shut down the coal industry by legislation (cap and trade) and regulation (EPA).
The nomination of Oliverio gives Democrats a chance to escape Mollohan’s corruption and attacks on coal, and that may not be good news for Republicans. It would have been easier to run against Mollohan for all the reasons he lost in the primary. The GOP would have painted him as a patsy for Pelosi and a thoroughly corrupt politician who spent more time concerned about his own fortunes than that of West Virginians. Now, Republicans will have to make the case against Oliverio that a Democratic vote enables Pelosi regardless of Oliverio’s stated policy decisions, which means more cap-and-trade and more attacks on coal despite anything Oliverio says or believes. That would be accurate, but it isn’t as emotionally impactful as corruption by an entrenched incumbent. On the other hand, beating an incumbent presents its own difficulties, so it could wind up being a wash.
Wash describes well what happened in this district last night regardless of what happens in the general election. West Virginia cleaned up government, one seat at a time, and that’s good news in and of itself.
The Boss Emeritus says DLTDHYOTWO.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
True, but an easy election is not what we are after. We want hard ones, bruising ones–I want congressmen going to DC knowing that they were battered and bruised and that there is more coming if they don’t do what they’re told. Easy elections make cushy congressmen, at least they probably contribute to them…
ted c on May 12, 2010 at 8:53 AM
This district is rated as R+9. McCain and Bush carried it comfortably, so the GOP has no excuse to not pick up this seat.
Doughboy on May 12, 2010 at 8:54 AM
Frankly, Democrat or Republican, guys like this need to go.
p0s3r on May 12, 2010 at 8:54 AM
..(flushing noise)..another turd down the bowl and on its way to the ocean.
The War Planner on May 12, 2010 at 8:54 AM
Tsunami building.
Fletch54 on May 12, 2010 at 8:54 AM
Maybe Mollohan should have asked for the endorsement of the two guys that endorsed Walker……
“rising star” endorsed out of the gate by……JEB & NEWT.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/jeb-bush-endorses-scott-walker-wisconsin-conservative-leader/story?id=10566334
It must be true since they are both such strong never-fail Conservatives right?
PappyD61 on May 12, 2010 at 8:55 AM
Could Ed be this incisive if he sat in for Bill O.?
Ed seems like another person on the tube.
IlikedAUH2O on May 12, 2010 at 8:55 AM
well said
cmsinaz on May 12, 2010 at 8:55 AM
The caption in sign under Mollohan in the picture needs to be completed to read “Democrats United…in Defeat”
VelvetElvis on May 12, 2010 at 8:56 AM
Mike Oliverio is honest and is an improvement over Mollohan, but he will be a reliable Democratic vote on most matters.
chaswv on May 12, 2010 at 8:56 AM
Thats just awful…..awful I say…….
The Smallest Crying Violin
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qi1npkqifnE
canopfor on May 12, 2010 at 8:56 AM
:)
thanks for the am chuckle
cmsinaz on May 12, 2010 at 8:57 AM
Queen – ‘Another One Bites the Dust’
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rY0WxgSXdEE
canopfor on May 12, 2010 at 8:58 AM
can we get Dede Scuzzafuvva’s opinion on that one? Dede? oh… Dede?
ted c on May 12, 2010 at 8:58 AM
canopfor on May 12, 2010 at 8:56 AM
===================================
:)
thanks for the am chuckle
cmsinaz on May 12, 2010 at 8:57 AM
cmsinaz: Whats amazing,is that Democrats,PURGE themselves!:)
canopfor on May 12, 2010 at 9:00 AM
heh heh
keep that one on your desktop, you will be using that one often throughout this year
cmsinaz on May 12, 2010 at 9:00 AM
Next up to bat, Elena Kagan!!
canopfor on May 12, 2010 at 9:01 AM
I say ‘carry on’!
:)
cmsinaz on May 12, 2010 at 9:02 AM
canopfor on May 12, 2010 at 8:58 AM
————————————–
heh heh
keep that one on your desktop, you will be using that one often throughout this year
cmsinaz on May 12, 2010 at 9:00 AM
cmsinaz: Yuppers!!:)
canopfor on May 12, 2010 at 9:03 AM
He’ll most likely be announcing his run as an Independant next week.
pilamaye on May 12, 2010 at 9:03 AM
ted c on May 12, 2010 at 8:53 AM
BetseyRoss on May 12, 2010 at 9:07 AM
Simple, just run ads talking about how the voters in Stupak’s district expected him to vote and how he did not.
Kafir on May 12, 2010 at 9:13 AM
Do you think our founders envisioned the “People’s Representatives” to be a father who served for thirty-forty years and who then handed his seat to his son who wanted to do the same?
Marcus on May 12, 2010 at 9:15 AM
Mollohan was a crook, and Bennett was a repeated and vocal shill for amnesty.
Why can’t the press look for actual reasons instead of always falling back on the same silly catch-phrases?
Anti-incumbent if the incumbent is a crook or an amnesty shill, yeah. But general anti-incumbent sentiment?
funky chicken on May 12, 2010 at 9:17 AM
There has to be some way we can frame these “after primary-turned independants” as losing prospects. Along with the Charlie Crists’ and Arlen Specters and jumpin’ Jim Jeffords, it may be more prudent to label these candidates as ineffective representatives of the people. If every sore loser turns independant for the general elections, we may actually see seats go to democrats that only receive 30-40% of the vote, yet squeak in. With few exceptions, any republican candidate that can’t carry his/her primary should be purged from the process one way or another.
Rovin on May 12, 2010 at 9:20 AM
It is time to flush these ignorant, corrupt pieces of human garbage regardless of what party they belong to. This scumbag was too obvious to overlook.
volsense on May 12, 2010 at 9:22 AM
This must be the Repub. battle cry in every general election campaign. Even conservative “blue dog” Dems caved when it came to the federal government takeover of whole U.S. industries. Party affiliation was stronger than principle. So if Oliverio attempts to sell himself as principled, his opponent should point to the marginalization of such people in Congress. Game over for the Dems, liberal or conservative.
WordsMatter on May 12, 2010 at 9:22 AM
I’m glad to see Mollohan get what he electorally deserves, but even my yellow dog Democrat mother was going to vote Republican against him in the general. Now she’ll probably cave and vote for Oliverio.
David McKinley won the Republican primary yesterday and he is a good and honest man. I’ve known him since I was a kid and he is the right kind of person to have representing the WV-01 in DC.
myrenovations on May 12, 2010 at 9:26 AM
DLTDHYOTWOGTFO
FIFY
bogginator on May 12, 2010 at 9:34 AM
See youuuu in Novemmmmberrrr,see youuuu when the summer’s thru…bye,bye,so long,farewell!
ohiobabe on May 12, 2010 at 9:34 AM
This is bad news for Republicans. This is one of those very odd years in which it is better for us to run against an incumbant Democrat than to have to try and pick up an open seat currently or most recently held by a Democrat. Picking up this seat will be harder for us now than it would have if we were able to run against Mollohan.
dczombie on May 12, 2010 at 9:45 AM
Bennett reaffirmed his offensiveness with his tearful “I lost” statement when he referred to the office he’d just lost as his “career”…
I know I, as a voter, am quite tired of the entrenched “careerists” in D.C. and think people after 20 years or so in Congress really should be doing something else with their lives.
Bennett was an amnesty shill, no doubt, and that position of his (being pro-amnesty) is FAR MORE UNSUPPORTED by the American voters than D.C. (and some churches) assumes it is.
Mollohan just seems like a crook in general.
Lourdes on May 12, 2010 at 9:48 AM
That party-strategy voting method has also worn thin with voters (certainly with this voter).
People want responsible people in D.C. and not “career” “celebrities” who claim to be “smart” and have resumes that include Fannie, Freddie and Goldman Sachs and Harvard.
The whole political-party-strategy voting methods have proven not to work, for the most part. We’ve ended up with too many RINOs in the GOP with the failed expectation that we’d “win” against the Left by running a candidate who’d appeal to the Left rather than one who would represent the Right.
Lourdes on May 12, 2010 at 9:51 AM
There is a sickness that wafts through the political air in West Virginia and it is spread by coal dust, the dust the dirty money that has fueled West Virginia’s politicians. I write about this in my piece: Robert C. Byrd, the Worst Thing to Happen to West Virginia, which you can read at http://www.thecjpoliticalreport.com. Concerning Mr. Mollohan, he is the perfect example for why this country needs to enact term limits.
~ Halli Casser-Jayne
The CJ Political Report on May 12, 2010 at 9:51 AM
This district is adjacent to PA-12 formerly held by Murtha, and the cultural demographic is similar, except that WV-1 isn’t gerrymandered and has a lower percent Democrat, and the Democrats are relatively conservative. I think a Republican can win it in spite of Oliverio’s name recognition and decent reputation.
Republicans should dominate pretty much the whole the Ohio River watershed in 2010 with the exception of some of the bigger cities, and even they won’t be so blue as in the past.
forest on May 12, 2010 at 10:01 AM
The dems lost the incumbency factor, which is huge. Oliverio will have to run as a blue dog to claim the seat, and we know how blue dogs are faring.
Vashta.Nerada on May 12, 2010 at 10:18 AM
Good point. It will come down to who do you trust and, after Obamacare, people are apt to look askance at “blue dogs”.
SKYFOX on May 12, 2010 at 10:29 AM
When Pelosi, Reid, Barney Frank, Rangel or other long-in-office Democrats get voted out then I will be impressed.
albill on May 12, 2010 at 10:32 AM
Meanwhile here in Nebraska we’re stuck with Democrat-lite Lee Terry for another couple years who voted for TARP and Cash for Clunkers.
Disgrace. I put my vote in for his challenger (Matt Sakalosky) but it wasn’t to be I guess.
Seriously, why can’t the GOP get rid of all these Democrat-lite politicians. Or perhaps the better question is, why do Nebraska voters keep fiscal slo-motion disasters like Lee Terry in office? I’m so fed up. Part of me wants to go 3rd Party but all that does is further ensure liberal democrat control of Congress and that is act dangerously close to treason the way they’re running things.
Any advice for this frustrated voter?
Yakko77 on May 12, 2010 at 10:40 AM
Your point is well taken. However, we still live within a party system and the House and Senate still operate on a party structure. So just replacing corrupt democrats with democrats who haven’t yet had the opportunity to become corrupt doesn’t really help anything. If democrats retain the majority it means we have a democrat Speaker, which means we have democrat chairmen of all the committees and subcommittees, which means that only liberal bills will make it to the floor.
I agree that we have to get rid of the corrupt and anti-conservative republican establisment types. But to think that we’re going to somehow be ok without a republican majority in congress is wishful thinking. We have to have a multi pronged strategy that involves a republican takeover of Congress and a house cleaning of the republican party so that when we do take over we can install a conservative speaker and conservative committee chairmen – especially over financial services, approps, etc. The same principle holds true for the Senate.
This is why primaries matter and it’s why what happened in Utah was good and refreshing for the party and for the country.
dczombie on May 12, 2010 at 11:08 AM
OK guys – help us, help you!
The link for the Repub, David McKinley:
http://www.mckinley2010.com/
humdinger on May 12, 2010 at 11:14 AM
AMF, Congressmman.
Another absolutely worthless, corrupt and incompetent Democrat gets shown the door.
The next task is to beat the clown who won the primary, strangle his career in the crib.
NoDonkey on May 12, 2010 at 11:16 AM
I completely disagree.
It’s physically impossible to be honest and to also be a Democrat politician.
Democrats and the left in general are all hideous liars who cannot be trusted.
If he isn’t a liar yet, send him to Washington and he’ll lie six times before he brushes his teeth in the morning.
NoDonkey on May 12, 2010 at 11:19 AM
Rep. Mollohan, you have a six month lead on finding your next job. Many of your colleagues will be joining you in November.
Carpe diem, Bub!
ya2daup on May 12, 2010 at 1:25 PM
ya2daup on May 12, 2010 at 1:25 PM
Mollohan will make a good canary in the coal mine.
See ya later, Democrats.
NoDonkey on May 12, 2010 at 1:28 PM