Rasmussen: Palin’s favorable rating now negative in … Alaska

posted at 6:15 pm on May 11, 2010 by Allahpundit

Dude, I think it was the Fiorina endorsement. Alaska hates RINOs!

A new Rasmussen Reports telephone survey of likely voters in the state finds that just 41% say they would vote for the former Alaska governor if she ran for president in 2012. Forty-eight percent (48%) say they would not vote for Palin, and 11% more are undecided.

Alaska voters are almost evenly divided in their views of Palin. Forty-nine percent (49%) view her at least somewhat favorably, while 50% share an unfavorable opinion of her. This includes 31% who regard her Very Favorably and 37% with a Very Unfavorable view.

Perhaps this can be explained in part by the feeling that the ex-governor who became Republican John McCain’s surprise running mate in the 2008 presidential campaign is bad for Alaska’s image. Thirty-eight percent (38%) say Palin’s views and activities reflect positively on Alaska’s image, but 45% think they reflect negatively on the state. Twelve percent (12%) say they have no impact.

She’ll bounce back a bit after that Alaska nature series finally launches, but … 49/50 at home? An interesting footnote here: Last July, shortly after she quit as governor, Hays Research found her favorable rating at 47/48, which the Palinistas at C4P duly challenged as unreliable. Ten months later, star righty pollster Scott Rasmussen has practically the same figures. What’s it all about, Alfie? Lingering resentment that she quit halfway through her term? A touch of class disgruntlement, perhaps, that their down-to-earth blue-collar political upstart is now a rich media celebrity? Maybe some class resentment the other way, i.e. they’re tired of being thought of as yokels by association per the media’s caricature of Sarahcuda? Or is this an entirely predictable result given that Palin’s become a more doctrinaire conservative since she first came on the scene locally, with the polarization among Alaska righties and lefties the obvious outcome? Considering how she polls nationally, Alaska’s number are actually a bit better than the average.

In other news, the new book’s set to drop on November 23. The theme, naturally, is American values. Exit question: With Sarahcuda having kneecapped herself among the base via the Fiorina endorsement, who’ll inherit the “true conservative” mantle now? You don’t suppose…

Update: C4P e-mails with strange new respect for Hays: According to their January poll, she’s at 53/43.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3

I think this is not about Allah. It’s really about MM.

Competition.

AnninCA on May 11, 2010 at 9:02 PM

That is silly. Michelle has been supportive of Sarah Palin pretty consistently since she was nominated.

Read this:

Sarah in the Springs
By Michelle Malkin • December 9, 2009 12:24 AM

We had frigid weather and several inches of Goreflakes on the ground here in Colorado Springs, but Sarah Palin lit up the town for a Borders signing earlier this evening that drew yet another massive crowd on her nationwide “Going Rogue” book tour.

My family and I had the great honor and pleasure of meeting the governor, her husband Todd, adorable baby Trig, her lovely parents, relatives, and friends from near and far. Sarah’s energy is boundless and her ability to connect is unparalleled with any public figure I’ve met in covering politics over the last 17 years. I spoke, for example, with the first family in line for the book signing. They arrived at 4:30am with four kids in tow. Sarah, the father of the family told me, had written a personal letter sending prayers and good wishes for one of their children battling cancer. On the way out, I ran into a soldier in BDUs rushing through the door with Palin’s book in hand. Breathless, he asked: “Do you think there’s any hope I’ll get my book signed?” Given the special attentiveness Palin’s staff paid to military and their families (several Blue Star families got VIP access), I’m sure he got his autograph. There are countless stories like this in every single city she has visited.

The governor and I talked briefly about Copenhagen (here’s her latest piece in the Washington Post calling on President Obama to stay home in the wake of ClimateGate), left-wing attacks on conservative politicians (Michele Bachmann is the latest target of specious ethics complaints), and the blessings of living outside the Beltway. Most of all, I’m glad I got a chance to simply say “Thank you” in person — for her strong conservative voice, for her relentless optimism in the face of unrelenting attacks, and for her public service as a defender of life and advocate of the American dream.

They have some things where they are at odds, like for instance John McCain. Michelle has spoken up in defense of Palin very often. She did not micromanage this blog, she lets the bloggers write what they want to write.

Brian1972 on May 11, 2010 at 9:18 PM

There are two serious people out there for our 2012 nod. One of them is Sarah Palin. The other one is Jeb Bush.

We may as well save a lot of time and money, and just go ahead and give it to Obama then, and start focusing on 2016. One of the few people with even less of a chance of winning than Palin is another Bush.

Hopefully we gain enough seats in 2010/2012 to keep Obama and the Democrat Tour of Destruction in check for awhile.

xblade on May 11, 2010 at 9:21 PM

This is what happens when you go Ricky Hollywood on Alaskans. They see her becoming a part of the establishment.

True_King on May 11, 2010 at 9:24 PM

Pffffttttt. I believe NO polls.

thebookkeeper on May 11, 2010 at 9:26 PM

Dark-Star on May 11, 2010 at 9:14 PM

The ethics complaints were all addressed by the board that reviews and decides on these things.

They did not just “disappear”, they were adjudicated one at a time, and dismissed. It has continued after she left office.

One more was dismissed just a week or two ago.

Read this from Palin’s attorney:

Swing and a miss
Tuesday, April 27, 2010 at 5:06pm

Yesterday we learned that another “ethics” complaint that was filed against Governor Palin was dismissed as baseless. (If you are counting, the Governor is 26-0-1 regarding such complaints or suits, with one still pending). Only this complaint was actually filed after she left office, and alleged that the mere existence of the Alaska Fund Trust (the legal defense fund set up for her to help defray the costs incurred during the Troopergate fiasco and related machinations that followed in its wake) was violative of the Alaska Executive Branch Ethics Act as well as its solicitation or receipt of contributions. The raison d’être of the legal defense fund was inexorably linked to Governor Palin’s nomination as the Republican candidate for Vice President and the post-nomination political tactics arising therefrom; thus making the nomination sine quo non for the fund. In a detailed opinion, the complaint was dismissed as lacking a factual or legal basis. Last June, upon learning that a complaint against the Governor’s Anchorage Office Director was dismissed as baseless, Governor Palin’s then Chief of Staff Mike Nizich said, “This is not about holding the governor or state employees accountable. This is pure harassment.” That still rings true today.

When I discussed this with Governor Palin, she had an interesting take: “My reaction upon reading the opinion in this matter was not what I expected. Though I’m always pleased with the results of these investigations that prove the false allegations wrong, and I appreciate the detailed reasoning set forth in this recent opinion, I was primarily disappointed that the State of Alaska, the Attorney General’s office, and others, still have to spend time and resources addressing the abusive onslaught of frivolous complaints directed against me—even after I left office.”

At times (indeed, as recently as Sunday in a magazine cover story) people allege that the “real” reason Governor Palin stepped down was to “make money” (citing primarily her best selling book). As this most current complaint again emphasizes, Governor Palin stepped down for the right reasons—she did not want to see her state government continue to get bogged down with inane “ethics” complaints that were transparently political, plainly partisan, and diverting state resources. The voluntary relinquishment of power for the greater good is normally praised as an example of true leadership—just review any biography of George Washington—and it should be in this case as well. But for those who seek power for the sake of power, a selfless act is confusing, so a new narrative is created, such as the “profit” motive now being asserted with renewed vigor. Rest assured Sarah Palin had obtained approval to write her memoir while still in office without running into any conflict with the Alaska Executive Branch Ethics Act. Her financial future from her best selling book, though unknown then, would not have altered much whether she stayed in office or resigned, except the number of “ethics” complaints did dramatically decrease, so any legal fees associated with such complaints decreased concomitantly.

Let this latest dismissed complaint serve as a reminder for one of the real—and stated—reasons for her voluntary relinquishment of office, an office she campaigned for diligently, tirelessly and effectively. It stands as a marker that occasionally, every so often, there are public servants who can recognize the difference between self-interest and public interest. Sarah Palin is one such public servant.

- Thomas Van Flein, personal attorney for Sarah Palin

I believe this is accurate. The resignation wasn’t just to “go make money”, it was a principled move she knew would damage her politically, but she saw it as the right thing to do for the State and her family, so she did it anyway.

Brian1972 on May 11, 2010 at 9:28 PM

This is what happens when you go Ricky Hollywood on Alaskans. They see her becoming a part of the establishment.

True_King on May 11, 2010 at 9:24 PM

Oh, b.s. The remarkable thing continues to be that even with all the sliming the woman has gone through for a year and a half, her positive numbers aren’t in the single digits.

ddrintn on May 11, 2010 at 9:39 PM

Another Palin hit piece at hotair; who’d of thunk it.

Keemo on May 11, 2010 at 6:31 PM

Allah must of been busy he is just catching up.

KBird on May 11, 2010 at 9:43 PM

Hmmmm.

“Palin folk be warned: you underestimate Jeb at your Peril. I’m a Palin supporter and I do not underestimate Jeb. Ever.”

If the matchup is between Jeb Bush and Barack Obama …. I’ll stay home.

Bush41? Bad

Bush43? Worse

Bush45? Is that a malt liquor?

memomachine on May 11, 2010 at 10:25 PM

Bush45? Is that a malt liquor?

memomachine on May 11, 2010 at 10:25 PM

Heh. Funny.

Brian1972 on May 11, 2010 at 10:30 PM

Palin, as much of a cynical fake as I find her to be, is marginally better in my mind, if for nothing else but the simple fact that she isn’t Backdoor John McCain.

This is an unfortunate and emerging reality. Ugh! I’m done with McCain. Watching his balls drop on immigration and amnesty has been as disgusting as, well, watching his balls drop.

The Race Card on May 12, 2010 at 12:22 AM

As for DeMint, (A) He’s said he isn’t running. (B) We need him where he is, as there are FEW conservatives in the Senate (RINO HQ) and (C) He has no executive experience. No executive experience, no White House. We’re done with that.

gary4205 on May 11, 2010 at 7:11 PM

DeMint has plenty of executive experience in the real world, as the CEO of his own company. That works well enough for me, and probably a lot of others.

Marybeth on May 12, 2010 at 8:00 AM

This is what happens when you go Ricky Hollywood on Alaskans. They see her becoming a part of the establishment.

True_King on May 11, 2010 at 9:24 PM

Oh, b.s. The remarkable thing continues to be that even with all the sliming the woman has gone through for a year and a half, her positive numbers aren’t in the single digits.

ddrintn on May 11, 2010 at 9:39 PM

Palin supporters keep using that explanation despite her continued downward trajectory. I wonder what explanation will be used if she does get to single digits.

True_King on May 12, 2010 at 8:36 AM

It doesn’t matter what they think of Sarah. It only matters what I think of her. And I like her.

Tennman on May 12, 2010 at 8:45 AM

It doesn’t matter what they think of Sarah. It only matters what I think of her. And I like her.

Tennman on May 12, 2010 at 8:45 AM

Congratulations, you’ve just founded the Church of Palin.

Dark-Star on May 12, 2010 at 8:50 AM

Dark-Star on May 12, 2010 at 8:50 AM

And how many churches have you founded?

CTSherman on May 12, 2010 at 8:57 AM

And how many churches have you founded?

CTSherman on May 12, 2010 at 8:57 AM

Same as you, zero.

I prefer not to confuse politicians with Jesus.

Dark-Star on May 12, 2010 at 8:59 AM

So if someone likes a particular person that you don’t like, they are worshiping said person. Got it.

CTSherman on May 12, 2010 at 9:22 AM

All that was to set up one question — can she win a general election without Alaska’s 3 EVs?

SCSoxFan on May 11, 2010 at 8:16 PM

Too many assumptions, not enough sound premise. No clear parameters, therefore no clear answer.

manwithblackhat on May 12, 2010 at 9:27 AM

The polls merely show the fickleness of people. Sheep.

Metanis on May 12, 2010 at 10:10 AM

It’s just the elite and the media trying to bring her down. lol

lexhamfox on May 12, 2010 at 10:29 AM

The pollspalinista behavior merely show the ficklenessnarrow focus of people worshippers. SheepLemmings.

Metanis on May 12, 2010 at 10:10 AM

fixt

Bradky on May 12, 2010 at 10:53 AM

As much as Palin supporters might complain about Allah, if we dedicated our lives to bashing him for every breadth he takes, called him names in every venue every time we had an opportunity to do so – like the anti-Palin posters do here and the coven of AK anklebiters do – he’d probably have lower approval ratings also.

It also appears that the “fall on the sword of Conservative purity” people have realized Palin isn’t inclined to lead them over the cliff like they hoped. It also appears that some Conservatives got overly excited about the chance to become relevant again and have gotten greedy. Probably outcome is that they will splinter into rabid groups defaming others for not being “true Conservatives” and throw away the best chance of becoming actual players. Pity.

katiejane on May 12, 2010 at 11:00 AM

Probably outcome is that they will splinter into rabid groups defaming others for not being “true Conservatives” and throw away the best chance of becoming actual players. Pity.

katiejane on May 12, 2010 at 11:00 AM

It also appears that many of you still think a politician will solve your problems and that any GOP winning an election is going to do sh1t to turn things around in this country. Pity.

“Players”…christ some of you are amazingly vapid and shallow. It is all just a game for you guys…like watching sports.

ClassicCon on May 12, 2010 at 11:07 AM

“Players”…christ some of you are amazingly vapid and shallow. It is all just a game for you guys…like watching sports.

ClassicCon on May 12, 2010 at 11:07 AM

Vapid and shallow – perhaps. Driven by the righteous sword of pure conservative thought – not.

Apparently you’re content to forever bit*h and moan about the evil libs ruining the country rather than electing someone who might help alter the course because they don’t meet YOUR definition of a “true Conservative”, – everyone isn’t.

katiejane on May 12, 2010 at 11:24 AM

Palin supporters keep using that explanation despite her continued downward trajectory. I wonder what explanation will be used if she does get to single digits.

True_King on May 12, 2010 at 8:36 AM

I’m sure they’ll just blame it on “RINOs” like Romney, Pawlenty, Jindal etc.

She is losing popularity because she is resembling a Bible Belt social conservative rather than a quirky Alaskan libertarian/conservative.

Speedwagon82 on May 12, 2010 at 12:25 PM

AP loves to find denigrating information about Sarah Palin. I guess that is the church of whine.

rlwo2008 on May 12, 2010 at 12:34 PM

Its kind of sad when SNL is able to dictate which public figures are acceptable.

Count to 10 on May 12, 2010 at 2:23 PM

I kind of doubt it’s the Fiorina endorsement. But I think the “she just resigned to make money” meme has gained a lot of traction, even in Alaska. There isn’t a whole lot she can do to refute it since it is true both that she did resign and that she did make money. The fact that the things she’s made money on were all supposed to fail hasn’t stopped the story.

Here’s a better question: Why does no one criticize The Donald for being “opportunistic” when he makes money from savvy but risky bets?

alwaysfiredup on May 12, 2010 at 2:40 PM

As much as Palin supporters might complain about Allah, if we dedicated our lives to bashing him for every breadth he takes, called him names in every venue every time we had an opportunity to do so – like the anti-Palin posters do here and the coven of AK anklebiters do – he’d probably have lower approval ratings also.

It also appears that the “fall on the sword of Conservative purity” people have realized Palin isn’t inclined to lead them over the cliff like they hoped. It also appears that some Conservatives got overly excited about the chance to become relevant again and have gotten greedy. Probably outcome is that they will splinter into rabid groups defaming others for not being “true Conservatives” and throw away the best chance of becoming actual players. Pity.

katiejane on May 12, 2010 at 11:00 AM

Two of the very best written paragraphs I’ve read in some time. Both are spot on.

Allah, of course is a childish ass who delights in trashing Sarah because it pisses his core readership off to no end.

As for the “politically pure” these nimrods are making the perfect the enemy of the good. They are so reality challenged that I fear there is absolutely no hope for them whatsoever.

Thank God there is a strong leader like Sarah who can see, and understand, the Big Picture.

gary4205 on May 12, 2010 at 2:45 PM

Here’s a better question: Why does no one criticize The Donald for being “opportunistic” when he makes money from savvy but risky bets?

Because he didn’t quit elected office to make money?

YYZ on May 12, 2010 at 2:53 PM

Dark-Star on May 12, 2010 at 8:50 AM

And you are the high assolist in the church of the gigantic rectum.

Don’t bother me kid. Go away somewhere and play with your slinky.

Tennman on May 12, 2010 at 2:58 PM

Because he didn’t quit elected office to make money?

YYZ on May 12, 2010 at 2:53 PM

Which office did he hold again?

Ronnie on May 12, 2010 at 2:58 PM

Which office did he hold again?

And that’s why his situation is not comparable to Sarah Palin’s.

YYZ on May 12, 2010 at 3:01 PM

YYZ on May 12, 2010 at 3:01 PM

Also, she has better hair.

Ronnie on May 12, 2010 at 3:11 PM

Also, she has better hair.

Ronnie on May 12, 2010 at 3:11 PM

James Carville has better hair than Donald Trump.

YYZ on May 12, 2010 at 3:14 PM

So…

When should we expect a post about how her new book (due in NOVEMBER) is marching up the Amazon list? Just checked, it’s up in the 60s.

When it breaks into the top 50?

Top 10?

If it reaches #1 6 months before release?

(She’s sooo unpopular. And irrelevant! Folks just can’t stop talking about her…)

cs89 on May 12, 2010 at 3:24 PM

Because he didn’t quit elected office to make money?

YYZ on May 12, 2010 at 2:53 PM

Neither did she. She quit office to a lot of questions about how she could ever show her face again, much less hold office. She could have stayed in office to write the book, so she clearly didn’t quit to do that. She could even have done the book tour while still in office as long as it wasn’t during the legislative session. No one had offered her a FOX gig. The only reason she has made money as a private person is because she, personally, is interesting and savvy enough to profit from it.

alwaysfiredup on May 12, 2010 at 3:43 PM

How’s that oily-drilly thingy working out for ya? Doncha know.

Constant Parrhesia on May 12, 2010 at 3:48 PM

I wouldn’t blame Gov. Palin a bit if she took off with her new found wealth and said the hell with all this.

Dr. ZhivBlago on May 12, 2010 at 4:46 PM

Rasmussen: Palin’s favorable rating now negative in … Alaska

Palin…Palin…Oh! You mean the dumb, ignorant, uneducated, doesn’t read the New York Times, talks funny, has five children (What was she thinking? Hasn’t she ever heard of a woman’s right to an abortion?), ex-governor of Alaska who quit because she was sooooo unethical and wanted to make a lot of money, didn’t go to Harvard or Yale but a public university, said “you can see Russia from my house,” backwoodsy, where-the-hell-is-Alaska?-I-never-heard-of-it-nor-have-I-ever-been-there-so-it-can’t-be-that-great, moose-hunting, gun-clinging, Christian nutjob, jacket-with-a-logo-on-it-wearing, Palin? THAT Palin? Gee, I wonder why her rating is negative after getting pummeled almost daily by the press for the last year and a half?

ncborn on May 12, 2010 at 6:13 PM

Allahpundit, why the Huckabee infatuation? Seriously. What’s weird is that he doesn’t really strike me as your type, so I feel like you only push him every time Sarah or Mitt take a hit so that you can drive traffic. A highly forgivable offense for a blogger whose job, after all, is to drive traffic to bring in the ads, but really? How many times are you going to keep asking for a second/third/fourth/eighty-fifth look at Huckabee? Enough already.

No.

And for the record, I don’t dislike the guy, I’m just not keen on him as a presidential candidate, as I believe many other commenters agree. That may put me with almost no one to root for (Herman Cain 2012!), but them’s the breaks these days: not a Gipper to be found.

Animator Girl on May 12, 2010 at 6:17 PM

As much as Palin loves Alaska, perhaps she is outgrowing it?

GFW on May 12, 2010 at 6:23 PM

CUDA

Metro on May 12, 2010 at 8:21 PM

The poll doesn’t say Alaskans don’t like Palin. It says that they believe that the rest of the country doesn’t like that.

It’s the same as when during Bush’s presidency his supporters (me included) knew that he was very unpopular domestically and in the world. But we still liked what he was doing even if every move he made sent the media and his critics into fits of hysteria and epilepsy.

AlexB on May 13, 2010 at 10:52 AM

Comment pages: 1 2 3