Dems to push $200 billion in spending before Memorial Day recess

posted at 10:55 am on May 11, 2010 by Ed Morrissey

Barack Obama has done a lot of posturing lately as a deficit hawk, especially after signing the Pay-Go legislation that supposedly requires Congress to pay for any new spending with new revenues or spending cuts elsewhere.  Since passing that rule in February, Democrats have repeatedly waived it in order to pass smaller bills.  With just a couple of weeks left before the Memorial Day recess, they’ll push legislation that will cost more than $200 billion — none of which will meet the Pay-Go requirement:

Congress faces a crush of votes on big-ticket items before the Memorial Day recess, setting up a debate on deficits less than six months before the November elections.

Democratic leaders are looking in the next three weeks to send President Barack Obama a slew of measures that cost more than $200 billion, including a multiyear extension of unemployment benefits, an extension of expiring tax provisions and Medicare doctor payments totaling $180 billion and a $33 billion Afghanistan war supplemental bill.

Because most of those costs won’t be paid for, Republicans plan to use those bills and the Democrats’ budget blueprint to highlight massive deficits ahead of the congressional midterm election. Republicans have recently been pointing to Greece’s dismal fiscal situation as a warning, claiming that the U.S. will be headed for a similar fate unless the deficits are curtailed.

“Washington Democrats’ out-of-control spending spree is scaring the hell out of the American people,” said Michael Steel, a spokesman for House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio). “It has to stop.”

Small wonder, then, that the Democratic members of the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform have begun talking about tax hikes — “pro-growth” tax hikes, which exist on the same plane of reality as unicorns, Bigfoot, and “conservative Democrats.”  They need the extra revenue because their colleagues in Congress continue raising the floor on spending cuts.  If Democrats were serious about the mission of the deficit commission, they would freeze spending until after the panel returns its recommendations.  Instead, they’re still spending as though there is no tomorrow.

What about Pay-Go, for that matter?  The entire idea of Pay-Go, the passage of which the Democrats celebrated like a Super Bowl victory, was to handcuff spending on borrowed money.  When did they plan on putting their new rule into effect — after Republicans take control of the House?   Because they’re certainly acting as though they can’t wait for that to happen.

Barack Obama will certainly veto any bill that doesn’t meet Pay-Go requirements, right?  Right?  Right?

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

Archimedes on May 11, 2010 at 1:23 PM

this?

txhsmom on May 11, 2010 at 1:27 PM

GoldenEagle4444 on May 11, 2010 at 1:05 PM

Not wanting to throw any aspertions at you, you like us had no choice in the matter, but…the average SS recpient has gleaned $22 for every $1 they put in and the money is no longer there for you (or me) to collect. The fund is $109TRILLION in the hole! Check the link below and pan to the bottom.

http://www.usdebtclock.org/

I know its an unsavory fact, but its still a fact, there is no more money.

Archimedes on May 11, 2010 at 1:33 PM

Who was the idiot Dem in a thread the other day who said that Fannie and Freddie’s woes could not be undertaken until next year? Since the Dems foresee losing their majority in the fall election, is this another of those sleights of hand that will blame the Republicans for making Americans suffer?

onlineanalyst on May 11, 2010 at 1:34 PM

txhsmom on May 11, 2010 at 1:27 PM

Galveston TX! That’s the one, thanks mom.

Archimedes on May 11, 2010 at 1:36 PM

dominigan on May 11, 2010 at 12:40 PM

That is why the American people and Congress should pay attention to Rep. Paul Ryan’s economic plan. It protects the SS of those 55 or older but allows those younger to opt into other methods of preparing for retirement beyond the government’s Ponzi scheme. What he proposes in his full plan does not raise taxes but does put the government on an austerity plan.

onlineanalyst on May 11, 2010 at 1:41 PM

txhsmom on May 11, 2010 at 1:27 PM

Don’t you remember?

Why, W had an attempt to reform SS which ended like the Hindenberg. At a SOTU, he was actually treated rudely.

Of course, Dems can’t really be rude so the event was ignored by the media.

http://www.ihatethemedia.com/social-security-going-bankrupt-democrats-cheer-themselves-for-defeating-reform

IlikedAUH2O on May 11, 2010 at 1:42 PM

There was that ultimate chick flick in the 80’s, can’t remember the name of it but it always made me want to go to Greece.

ORconservative on May 11, 2010 at 12:45 PM
Dunno if it’s the same one, but the one that comes to mind is “Summer Lovers” with Daryl Hannah and some female Greek hottie. Wowza.

Midas on May 11, 2010 at 12:50 PM

Shirley Valentine?

onlineanalyst on May 11, 2010 at 1:44 PM

The Destroyer is hard at work…………must BANKRUPT AMERICA to get them to go along with NEW GLOBAL GOVERNMENT with ME as the head of said institution.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0CV8Xt2VWvc

AFTER ALL……I am a citizen of the World.

(thoughts floating around in Baracks’ head all the time).

PappyD61 on May 11, 2010 at 1:55 PM

At this point we can now peg UFO’s as more real than fiscally conservative Democrats. Or any form of conservative Democrats. Or ‘Blue Dog’ Democrats. Or ‘Yellow Dog’ Democrats.

There have been more recorded sightings of UFO’s over the past 30 years than any of those forms of Democrat that aren’t Leftist… so I’m betting on the reality of UFO’s first.

ajacksonian on May 11, 2010 at 2:03 PM

I better start making preparations for little 7% and his future family to live at home with me…

He’s only 7 years old, and I can’t imagine the financial crisis his generation is going to face in twenty years.

… Some how I believe, “I’m sorry”, isn’t going to cut it.

Seven Percent Solution on May 11, 2010 at 2:19 PM

I better start making preparations for little 7% and his future family to live at home with me…

He’s only 7 years old, and I can’t imagine the financial crisis his generation is going to face in twenty years.

… Some how I believe, “I’m sorry”, isn’t going to cut it.

Seven Percent Solution on May 11, 2010 at 2:19 PM

Nothing wrong with that really. It was not too awfully long ago that muli-generation homes were very common. I can remember 3 generations living in one house on my moms side, and I am only in my mid 50s.

Johnnyreb on May 11, 2010 at 2:30 PM

There are only two things that PayGo really applies to (as far as Democrats go) — Tax Cuts and increased military spending.

Everything the Democrats really want to spend money on will be considered emergency spending that does an end run around PayGo.

drfredc on May 11, 2010 at 5:04 PM

“pro-growth” tax hikes

Sort of like “pro-life” abortion?

karl9000 on May 11, 2010 at 7:14 PM

Comment pages: 1 2