Coats sails to large lead over Ellsworth in IN

posted at 2:55 pm on May 7, 2010 by Ed Morrissey

The more that Indiana voters see of Rep. Brad Ellsworth and the Democratic leadership in Congress, the more inclined they are to send former Senator Dan Coats to Washington.  In the first post-primary survey of likely voters in the state, Coats has an 15-point lead over Ellsworth for a seat Evan Bayh easily held through two terms:

Newly chosen Republican nominee Dan Coats earns 51% support while his Democratic rival Brad Ellsworth’s attracts 36% in the first Rasmussen Reports telephone survey of the Indiana Senate race following Tuesday’s GOP Primary. …

Coats, who previously served in the U.S. Senate from 1989 to 1999, captured 39% of the vote in a five-way race on Tuesday to win the state Republican Senate nomination. His four opponents have now endorsed his candidacy. Ellsworth, a U.S. congressman, is unchallenged for his party’s nomination.

In surveys since Democratic Senator Evan Bayh’s surprise announcement that he would not seek reelection, Coat’s support in match-ups with Ellsworth has grown from 46% in February to 54% last month. Ellsworth’s support in those same surveys has remained in the narrow range of 32% to 34%.

Gee, what could be holding Ellsworth to the mid-thirties?  Three guesses:

Ellsworth voted in favor of the recently-passed national health care plan, but 59% of Indiana voters favor repeal of that plan. The Indiana finding includes 48% who Strongly Favor repeal. Thirty-eight percent (38%) oppose repeal, with 26% who Strongly Oppose it. Those figures are similar to the national average.

Eighty-one percent (81%) of those who Strongly Favor repeal support Coats, while 80% of those in the smaller group who Strongly Oppose it support Ellsworth.

Interestingly, independents are almost evenly split between the two candidates, 38/35 for Coats.  More than twice as many Democrats will cross over to vote for Coats (18%) as Republicans will to vote for Ellsworth (7%).  Coats wins women, barely edging Ellsworth at the margin of error, 45/42.  He beats Ellsworth easily among men, 57/29, and among all age groups except the youngest voters.

Ellsworth has problems on his own, let alone against Coats.  His favorability rating is only 43%, against 35% unfavorable.  Only 9% of voters have a “very favorable” impression of Ellsworth, while 13% have a “very unfavorable” opinion of him.  The issues also play against Ellsworth and the Democrats.  Sixty-one percent would support an immigration-enforcement law in Indiana like the one in Arizona, while Hoosiers narrowly oppose climate-change legislation, 41/38.  More than two-thirds think the Republicans are the Party of No, and a narrow plurality thinks that’s OK, 33/31, with 36% not sure.

This race has just begun, but it looks like it may be over before it started.  Unless something drastic changes to make Democrats look good between now and November, it’s Coats’ race to win.  Given his long experience, he’s not likely to make a mistake that will give Ellsworth the kind of narrative changer that will make Indiana voters forget ObamaCare and Nancy Pelosi.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Coats wins women, barely edging Ellsworth at the margin of error, 45/42.

Why are so many women stupid/liberal?

Jaibones on May 7, 2010 at 2:57 PM

the signs and portents of a true re-alignment against socialism are taking shape, perhaps with the collapse of the European social-welfare model the US can turn the page on the left and its allies in the media, universities and unions.

rob verdi on May 7, 2010 at 2:58 PM

Coats is an establishment type.

I’m not really surprised he won. I’m just surprised by the amount he won by. I, for one, will not be voting for him and looking for a 3rd party candidate.

Notorious GOP on May 7, 2010 at 2:59 PM

Coats wins women, barely edging Ellsworth at the margin of error, 45/42. He beats Ellsworth easily among men, 57/29…

Something that has bothered me for years has been all the media hype about the GOP “gender gap” where Democrats usually win the womens’ vote — but they ignore the much large gap the other way, where Dems very often get creamed on the mens’ vote.

jwolf on May 7, 2010 at 3:00 PM

And to think the AP spun this as “good” for Democrats.

LOL.

Ryan Anthony on May 7, 2010 at 3:01 PM

Why are so many women stupid/liberal?

Jaibones on May 7, 2010 at 2:57 PM

Women are more emotional than men. Dems exploit that.

platypus on May 7, 2010 at 3:04 PM

Why are so many women stupid/liberal?

Jaibones on May 7, 2010 at 2:57 PM

Let’s see… Women got the right to vote in 1920, just about the same Progressives started gaining traction at winning elections and destroying the country.

[ducks]

Daggett on May 7, 2010 at 3:05 PM

Well this assuredly is great news. The prospects of an epic landslide in ’10 continue apace.

On another note Ed, heard anything on the grapevine about a possible Daniels run for Prez?

Archimedes on May 7, 2010 at 3:09 PM

I’m not really surprised he won. I’m just surprised by the amount he won by. I, for one, will not be voting for him and looking for a 3rd party candidate,

Notorious GOP

Just like the Brown election in Massachusetts. That district is historically Democratic leaning. It’s very unlikely a conservative would have a chance of running. Baby steps, Baby steps.

Egfrow on May 7, 2010 at 3:10 PM

[ducks]

Daggett on May 7, 2010 at 3:05 PM

Heh. You’d better start wearing body armor, especially if you’re married.

jwolf on May 7, 2010 at 3:12 PM

Why are so many women stupid/liberal?

Jaibones on May 7, 2010 at 2:57 PM

Because girls aren’t good at math. … just kidding.

BowHuntingTexas on May 7, 2010 at 3:14 PM

Heh. You’d better start wearing body armor, especially if you’re married.

jwolf on May 7, 2010 at 3:12 PM

I’ve told my wife several times that giving women the right to vote destroyed this country.

Truth is truth.

fossten on May 7, 2010 at 3:15 PM

Why are so many women stupid/liberal?

Jaibones on May 7, 2010 at 2:57 PM

They need a daddy figure, so they vote for daddy government.

SirGawain on May 7, 2010 at 3:16 PM

Why are so many women stupid/liberal

Abortions. And don’t kid yourself it isn’t.

At the risk of sounding chauvanistic (which I am, proudly), more women today are invovled in politics either as politicians or active participants in political debate (at the office, at home, etc..), and at the polls.

In the past, however, women in general didn’t follow politics. But, they did know the Democrats supported abortion, and for some thats all they needed to know.

Unfortunately, a small but still significant number of women vote soley on that issue. The rest of it, the economy, foreign affairs, military, etc.. is just not that interesting.

I will now retire to my secret bunker.

BobMbx on May 7, 2010 at 3:17 PM

Coats is an establishment type.

I’m not really surprised he won. I’m just surprised by the amount he won by. I, for one, will not be voting for him and looking for a 3rd party candidate.

Notorious GOP on May 7, 2010 at 2:59 PM

It’s a free country and you have a right to your opinion and a right to voice such an opinion, but I believe I also have the right to say comments like yours make me want to scream out loud.

Why don’t you just vote for Ellsworth? The choice will be the same.

I live in Indiana and I voted for Marlin Stutzman, not Dan Coats, but I also realize the the time for hashing out differences is during the primary.

Do what you want, but we’re all very much aware of the consequences of your actions even though you may not.

Oink on May 7, 2010 at 3:19 PM

America comes to it senses but is it too late?

jukin on May 7, 2010 at 3:25 PM

Cause thats just how us bible and gun hugging Hoosier roll :)

HoosierCon on May 7, 2010 at 3:30 PM

Ellsworth voted in favor of the recently-passed national health care plan,

About the only benefit any of us ever get out of that atrocity is watching the supporters lose their elections.

fourdeucer on May 7, 2010 at 3:34 PM

Why don’t you just vote for Ellsworth? The choice will be the same.

I live in Indiana and I voted for Marlin Stutzman, not Dan Coats, but I also realize the the time for hashing out differences is during the primary.

Do what you want, but we’re all very much aware of the consequences of your actions even though you may not.

Well said Oink, well said. We can’t change the laws of the land until the GOP is running the Congress again. It starts with the first step, which is to elect as many Republicans to office as we can.

Old Fritz on May 7, 2010 at 3:35 PM

Didn’t vote for him in the primary, but will gladly vote to put him in the seat currently occupied by Bayh.

That’s a trade I can live with!

cs89 on May 7, 2010 at 3:37 PM

I am horribly upset that Coats beat Stutzman. But even a carpet bagging Republican is better than a Dem if I can’t have my conservative. And hopefully Indiana has learned its lesson and will switch back to Red this election.

search4truth on May 7, 2010 at 3:40 PM

Coats wins women, barely edging Ellsworth at the margin of error, 45/42.

Why are so many women stupid/liberal?

Jaibones on May 7, 2010 at 2:57 PM

Wait a minute, Barack Obama and Brad Ellsworth are both men, last time I looked.

Terrye on May 7, 2010 at 4:09 PM

I am horribly upset that Coats beat Stutzman. But even a carpet bagging Republican is better than a Dem if I can’t have my conservative. And hopefully Indiana has learned its lesson and will switch back to Red this election.

search4truth on May 7, 2010 at 3:40 PM

Stutzman is a state rep who was not known by a lot of people in the state. Pence supported Coats and everyone knows who he is. Stutzman got support from DeMint, but then again DeMint is not a hoosier and Pence is.

Terrye on May 7, 2010 at 4:11 PM

It’s good to see Coats well ahead and Indiana looking to turn Red, but what’s wrong with Ohio, where Fisher (D) is leading Portman (R) 43-42 in the Senate race, according to Rasmussen?

In a year when we need 9 pickups to break even in the Senate, we can’t afford a loss in Ohio. What does Portman need to win?

Steve Z on May 7, 2010 at 4:12 PM

It’s a free country and you have a right to your opinion and a right to voice such an opinion, but I believe I also have the right to say comments like yours make me want to scream out loud.

Why don’t you just vote for Ellsworth? The choice will be the same.

I live in Indiana and I voted for Marlin Stutzman, not Dan Coats, but I also realize the the time for hashing out differences is during the primary.

Do what you want, but we’re all very much aware of the consequences of your actions even though you may not.

Oink on May 7, 2010 at 3:19 PM

When you start accepting establishment types, especially in the state of Indiana, then you get the Charlie Crist’s and Arlen Specter’s of the world.

So congrats on supporting mediocre candidates.

Notorious GOP on May 7, 2010 at 4:12 PM

Well said Oink, well said. We can’t change the laws of the land until the GOP is running the Congress again. It starts with the first step, which is to elect as many Republicans to office as we can.

Old Fritz on May 7, 2010 at 3:35 PM

The GOP is bad. The Dems are just worse. There isn’t too much difference between the two.

Notorious GOP on May 7, 2010 at 4:13 PM

Coats is an establishment type.

I’m not really surprised he won. I’m just surprised by the amount he won by. I, for one, will not be voting for him and looking for a 3rd party candidate.

This is the kind of crap you see at RedState. If the candidate of choice does not win they want to go home, cry to mommy, and suck their thumb. I am as conservative as they come…but my gosh, could we use just a little common sense?

jmell7 on May 7, 2010 at 4:17 PM

Didn’t vote for him in the primary, but will gladly vote to put him in the seat currently occupied by Bayh.

That’s a trade I can live with!

cs89 on May 7, 2010 at 3:37 PM

Since you’re an Indianan, I’d like to pick your brain for a sec: what do you think Bayh is really up to by leaving his seat? Do you think he’s going to challenge Obama?

leilani on May 7, 2010 at 4:17 PM

Republicans will to vote for Ellsworth (7%).

What’s the matter with these people?

Schadenfreude on May 7, 2010 at 4:21 PM

This is the kind of crap you see at RedState. If the candidate of choice does not win they want to go home, cry to mommy, and suck their thumb. I am as conservative as they come…but my gosh, could we use just a little common sense?

jmell7 on May 7, 2010 at 4:17 PM

Who said I was crying? That’s cool if you want to settle for middle of the road candidates. Just don’t be too upset when they don’t vote for your position when the political winds change.

Notorious GOP on May 7, 2010 at 4:22 PM

I am under no allusions that anyone is going to vote the way I want all the time. Coats is a conservative. Maybe not as conservative as Stutzman, but he is no Crist, Specter, Snowe, or Collins.

jmell7 on May 7, 2010 at 4:26 PM

I’m honestly surprised Stutzman made as good a showing as he did. I like him a lot and this, at least, got his name on the map. I’d like to see him in a House run or, even better (as was suggested a couple days ago) challenging Lugar for his seat in a couple years.

I don’t believe this country is just going to flip overnight from Obama to Reagan. So, yes, that means I’ll vote for candidates who are slightly less conservative than I would like if that means it’s one less vote for Pelosi or one more vote to repeal Health Care.

We have to stop the flow before we can begin to reverse it.

lonesome_pine on May 7, 2010 at 4:31 PM

“This race has just begun, but it looks like it may be over before it started. Unless something drastic changes to make Democrats look good between now and November, it’s Coats’ race to win.”

..uh oh! The dreaded 51% for-the-challenger coupled with the dreaded incumbent-below-40% phenomenon. How we’d like to see this crop up all over the country this Fall.

The War Planner on May 7, 2010 at 4:35 PM

leilani on May 7, 2010 at 4:17 PM

Only been here a couple of years, but I think Bayh knew he would lose & chose to quit while ahead. He won’t go for POTUS in ’12, IMHO, unless Obama declines to run or is seriously underwater.

His phones were melting during the Obamacare fiasco. He couldn’t come out and support it, but couldn’t oppose the POTUS from his own party either. He essentially hid for weeks, then voted for the bills while squawking about fiscal responsibility. When I called to ask him to vote against Obamacare, I’d literally go down the list of his offices until I found one without a full voicemailbox to leave the message on multiple times.

He’ll take a business/govt. position, sit out 2010, and see what happens. At least, that’s my guess.

cs89 on May 7, 2010 at 4:38 PM

Steve Z on May 7, 2010 at 4:12 PM

I live in Ohio. Actually that’s a sad commentary on Fisher who has been the Lt Gov the last 4 years and had been the AG back in the early 90s when he’s tied with a guy most people don’t know all that well. There’s no way Dems pick up any open Senate seats this year unless the GOP nominee really screws up.

gsherin on May 7, 2010 at 4:45 PM

I, for one, will not be voting for him and looking for a 3rd party candidate.

The Indiana Democratic Party thanks you.

KeepOhioRed on May 7, 2010 at 4:53 PM

He’ll take a business/govt. position, sit out 2010, and see what happens. At least, that’s my guess.

cs89 on May 7, 2010 at 4:38 PM

Thanks for your take. I guess if he was looking at certain doom at the polls, he knew a defeat in his home state would put a serious crimp in any national ambitions he might entertain in the future, so he did the smart thing if he wanted to keep his Presidential options open.

Too bad he didn’t grow a brain before he decided to sell out the people of Indiana & vote for ObamaCare.

leilani on May 7, 2010 at 5:41 PM

Coats is an establishment type.

I’m not really surprised he won. I’m just surprised by the amount he won by. I, for one, will not be voting for him and looking for a 3rd party candidate.

Notorious GOP on May 7, 2010 at 2:59 PM

So you’ll be voting to keep the dims the majority in the Senate. Good work.

Even if he’s a RINO, controlling the Senate or the House means the leadership controls what gets voted on.

Lou Budvis on May 7, 2010 at 5:41 PM

Wait a minute, Barack Obama ….. are both men, last time I looked.

Terrye on May 7, 2010 at 4:09 PM

I’m guessing you never saw him pitch.

TugboatPhil on May 7, 2010 at 6:24 PM

Too bad he didn’t grow a brain before he decided to sell out the people of Indiana & vote for ObamaCare.

leilani on May 7, 2010 at 5:41 PM

I’m a Hoosier as well, Bayh was going to have terribly ugly campaign and probable loss. His wife being on the board of Wellpoint and a few other health care companies and making some easy millions was going to be a real flashpoint in his campaign. bayh was always a “finger in the air” politician and for years as Governor, and then Senator had avoided any real criticism. His real problems started when he started getting “looked at” as a VP contender…He took the poison Rham made him swallow, gotta be a payback somewhere down the road for that healthcare (and career ending) vote.

Tim Zank on May 7, 2010 at 7:29 PM

So you’ll be voting to keep the dims the majority in the Senate. Good work.

Even if he’s a RINO, controlling the Senate or the House means the leadership controls what gets voted on.

Lou Budvis on May 7, 2010 at 5:41 PM

Lou is right. I voted for Marlin, but that battle is over. Coats wasn’t my first pick, but I know him and he’s a good guy that won’t go “Crist” or “Specter” on us.

Marlin could have beat Ellsworth as well, my biggest complaint was having the RNC and national leadership “foist” a candidate on us. We had it under control.

But, as I said, that battle is over and I will support Dan Coats and we’ll get Indiana back to the proper state of “redness”!!

Tim Zank on May 7, 2010 at 7:34 PM

Why are so many women stupid/liberal?

Jaibones on May 7, 2010 at 2:57 PM

Estrogen poisoning.

PakviRoti on May 7, 2010 at 7:48 PM

As I have commented here before we are twice supporters of Ellsworth and democrats. No longer can we support him since he voted for stimulus and Healthcare. We voted for Hostetler. Coats we will support but he is a horrible candidate. Ellsworth will have a better grade on immigration than Coats from NumbersUsa but if Ellsworth were senator I have no doubt he would vote for amnesty if Obama told him to.

PTN 39 on May 7, 2010 at 8:11 PM

One more thing,I look for poll numbers to tighten Ellsworth has $1 million on hand to try and define Coats early as a lobbyist,bail out supporting out of state recently living in VA. As I said we will support him but would of rather had Hostetler or Stutzman. Ellsworth became a Obama?Pelosi yes man. Also plan on voting for Larry Bushon Evansville heart surgeon against Trent Van Haaften (D)(state legislator) for 8th Ellsworths old 8th district seat.

PTN 39 on May 7, 2010 at 9:54 PM

I live in Ellsworth’s district, and the FIRST thing I saw on TV about the issue after his first vote was “Brad Ellsworth stood up to insurance companies with his vote on Health Care legislation.”

Really? Big tough Braddy boy stood up to companies that barely turn a 2-3% profit? WHAT A MAN. *swoon*

More like he voted to CLOSE them and force people on to a government system that will most definitely fund mass abortions, while at the same time claiming to be a pro-life democrat. Everyone hates Stupak for selling out his principles for a worthless Executive order, but what did Ellsworth do? He proved to every single non-leftwing voter in our district he’s nowhere near what we think when we hear “Conservative Democrat.” Placing labels in front of “Democrat” means nothing but that they might squirm a bit when they vote with their party.

Cheesecakecrush on May 7, 2010 at 10:09 PM

I live in Indiana and I voted for Marlin Stutzman, not Dan Coats, but I also realize the the time for hashing out differences is during the primary.

Do what you want, but we’re all very much aware of the consequences of your actions even though you may not.

Oink on May 7, 2010 at 3:19 PM

As a Hoosier who also voted for Stutzman as well, I will likely vote for Coats but I’d love the opportunity to ask him what he will do about Obamacare specifically and Obama’s radical leftist agenda in general, not just what he will give lip service to.

SKYFOX on May 8, 2010 at 3:28 PM