Freddie Mac: We need another $10.6 billion

posted at 8:03 pm on May 5, 2010 by Allahpundit

Remember, the bailout potential here is theoretically infinite. The White House removed the $200 billion cap on Fannie/Freddie last December — for no obvious reason, although analysts had plenty of theories. One possible reason: Lifting the cap last year before F&F’s losses approached the limit meant avoiding a nasty political headache down the road. When, circa 2012, the two finally cross the $200 billion threshold in liabilities, all it’ll occasion now is a news story about “grim milestones.” No messy public debate about whether The One should uncap them required. Just cut ‘em a new check and that’s that.

$127 billion and counting.

Freddie Mac on Wednesday requested another $10.6 billion handout from the federal government.

The housing finance company, which reported an $8 billion quarterly loss, was put into conservatorship by the government during the height of the financial panic in September 2008 along with its twin Fannie Mae (FNM, Fortune 500).

Freddie has already received $50.7 billion from the Treasury Department. Fannie Mae has so far gotten $76.2 billion…

The McLean, Va.-based company said it helped more than 71,000 families avoid foreclosure during the quarter and financed more than 390,000 homes and 50,000 units of rental housing. It also helped refinance $68 billion of single-family loans.

McCain, Shelby, and Gregg are preparing an amendment that would restore the $200 billion cap and end the feds’ conservatorship within three years. Can’t wait for the floor vote. Exit question: How long do Democrats plan to continue making love to the mortgage market?

Update: “In addition, Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner has acknowledged that the government expects to suffer ‘very substantial losses’ on its investments in the lenders, with recent estimates ranging around a minimum of $85 billion.”

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

And from the mainstream media, what do we hear?
Nothing but the sound of crickets.

JellyToast on May 5, 2010 at 8:05 PM

Freddie Mac: We need another $10.6 billion

American Taxpayer ; Bugger off!

Guardian on May 5, 2010 at 8:06 PM

Nein!

Inanemergencydial on May 5, 2010 at 8:06 PM

Money is like Doritos, you can always make more. Run those presses until they burn up.

Bishop on May 5, 2010 at 8:07 PM

The Democrats. Tossing the US Treasury in the air and shouting “whatever hits the floor, we’ll spend!”

Wind Rider on May 5, 2010 at 8:07 PM

From my cold dead fingers.

upinak on May 5, 2010 at 8:07 PM

Is this how it’s gonna be with GM and Chrysler as well? The GOP better cut them off the moment they take back the House.

Doughboy on May 5, 2010 at 8:08 PM

$10 billion is just chump change now.

yoda on May 5, 2010 at 8:08 PM

Freddie Mac: We need another $10.6 billion

no way, nada, nil

cmsinaz on May 5, 2010 at 8:09 PM

heckuva job timmy

cmsinaz on May 5, 2010 at 8:10 PM

At what point does this become criminal…?

Seven Percent Solution on May 5, 2010 at 8:11 PM

Somehow I’m reminded of that line from “Jaws” when the big shark finally makes an appearance and scares the daylights out of Chief Brody as he’s chumming the water – causing him to say “We’re going to need a bigger boat…” This inept organization is going to suck our nation’s financial lifeblood…. and it was already gushing out on the floor….

Jill1066 on May 5, 2010 at 8:11 PM

Take it out of Congressional and White House Budgets. Make sure you tap Michelle’s staff as well, who needs a 24x7x365 makeup artist to travel with her?

SeniorD on May 5, 2010 at 8:12 PM

At what point does this become criminal…?

Seven Percent Solution on May 5, 2010 at 8:11 PM

We are way past criminal. It is truly amazing that there seems to be no way for it to peacefully stop.

Inanemergencydial on May 5, 2010 at 8:13 PM

This is a national disgrace and the corrupt elite media will not touch it. When does Fannie get their next installment?

d1carter on May 5, 2010 at 8:14 PM

d1carter on May 5, 2010 at 8:14 PM

the msm are probably getting hush money from them…

cmsinaz on May 5, 2010 at 8:15 PM

$10 billion is just chump change now.

yoda on May 5, 2010 at 8:08 PM

Sadly true. It’s only when you’re in the ballpark of over $500 billion when it sounds like real money.

I never dreamed I would ever contemplate that.

tru2tx on May 5, 2010 at 8:17 PM

At some point one has to admit, you’ve been bailed out enough.

Skandia Recluse on May 5, 2010 at 8:18 PM

Liberal Democrat Social Engineering results for all to see…

… Oh, you thought that the Community Reinvestment Act, which was the trigger for our economic collapse, was actually stopped?

Silly rabbit!

Seven Percent Solution on May 5, 2010 at 8:18 PM

Freddie is even more funny than Bernie Mac.

ericdijon on May 5, 2010 at 8:18 PM

Freddie Mac: We need another $10.6 billion

Sounds fine to me. Let’s start passing the hat around Congress and the bureaucratic bureau. Personal money only, please. No taxpayer funds.

amerpundit on May 5, 2010 at 8:25 PM

Freddie, Fannie take note…You ARE Big Enough to Fail.

old trooper2 on May 5, 2010 at 8:25 PM

How long do Democrats plan to continue making love to the mortgage market?

Bawney Fwank has dibbs on Fanny.

farright on May 5, 2010 at 8:29 PM

Bawney Fwank has dibbs on Fanny.

farright on May 5, 2010 at 8:29

I imagine that you mean this in the most literal sense?

milwife88 on May 5, 2010 at 8:31 PM

I know, let’s let Barney Franks roll the dice again.

What could go wrong?

GnuBreed on May 5, 2010 at 8:31 PM

i watched the dinosaur networks’ 6:30 newscasts tonite. not one mentioned this. what a laugh.

sbvft contributor on May 5, 2010 at 8:33 PM

Politicians would rather destroy the country’s future financial integrity rather than be the guy on the watch when an institution goes bankrupt. It’s all about feeding the croc so that it eats them last.

The last financial crisis we had wasn’t big enough for liberals. It’s still business as usual. Just like 9/11 wasn’t big enough for them. The Big Ones are coming.

keep the change on May 5, 2010 at 8:34 PM

sbvft contributor on May 5, 2010 at 8:33 PM

Not surprised…

cmsinaz on May 5, 2010 at 8:34 PM

No problem. Hussein Obama can just sell a few of our aircraft carriers to the Chinese or sell some nuclear bombs to the Iranians which should stop them from developing their own.

MB4 on May 5, 2010 at 8:35 PM

Um, no, you don’t.

Joan of Argghh on May 5, 2010 at 8:35 PM

. Exit question: How long do Democrats plan to continue making love to the mortgage market?

Oh, right up until we become the new Greece or maybe a better analogy would be Argentina.

bluemarlin on May 5, 2010 at 8:37 PM

Update: “In addition, Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner has acknowledged that the government expects to suffer ‘very substantial losses’ on its investments in the lenders, with recent estimates ranging around a minimum of $85 billion.”

Never mind which party you belong to, it’s time to tell this government HELL NO!

How many times would a private company be allowed to walk into any lending institution, tell the lender you’re projecting to continue to lose money for an unforseeable future and expect to walk out with a loan?

Rovin on May 5, 2010 at 8:37 PM

If that moron Mike Steele or any other GOP organ does use this to hammer the Dems I swear I’ll scream at every GOP meeting I go to.

Stop the stupid stuff about Nancy P or fake joke vids and hammer the dems on their ineptitude !

William Amos on May 5, 2010 at 8:42 PM

For those that what to know,how in the h*ll did it
get to this,I present the birthplace of it all,with
Nancy Pelosi,getting the 700 Billion Dollar First
Bailout,and,getting the Republican Party onboard for
the vote,and then Nancy strutted to the well,and sold
the Republican Party down the river,with demonizing
and threats of investigations,

of the“8 years of Failed Bush Policies`!!

==========================================================
Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) Floor Speech Before Bailout Vote

http://youtube.ca/watch?v=VMLo7i38D58

canopfor on May 5, 2010 at 8:48 PM

So does RAINES have to give back any of his $6 MILLION bonus?

Where’s Barry? Isn’t that A LITTLE TOO MUCH MONEY?

GarandFan on May 5, 2010 at 8:52 PM

At what point does this become criminal…?

Seven Percent Solution on May 5, 2010 at 8:11 PM

December 1913.

riverrat10k on May 5, 2010 at 8:56 PM

Exit question: How long do Democrats plan to continue making love to the mortgage market f***ing responsible homeowners?

mrt721 on May 5, 2010 at 9:04 PM

So does RAINES have to give back any of his $6 MILLION bonus?

Where’s Barry? Isn’t that A LITTLE TOO MUCH MONEY?

GarandFan on May 5, 2010 at 8:52 PM

I think you are a bit low, I think Franklin made about 90 Million while he was there. Barry would be happy to overlook that one I bet, he was at the top of the class in receiving money from Fannie and Freddie, hmm, kind of like Goldman and BP as well.

bluemarlin on May 5, 2010 at 9:09 PM

How long do Democrats plan to continue making love to the mortgage market?

Sodomy used to be a bad thing.
Randy

williars on May 5, 2010 at 9:15 PM

$127 billion and counting.

And that’s just from the mortgages they weren’t able to pass onto other banks.

agmartin on May 5, 2010 at 9:24 PM

What would happen if Freddie Mac were denied the 10.6 billion? What exactly would happen to future loans out in the free and open market? Adjustments? Reduced home building? What are precisely the downsides? Does this mean that future guaranteed loans via Freddie Mac are to be reduced accordingly? How much of this 10.6 billion covers the future operating costs of Freddie Mac? What are the salaries for Freddie Mac employees? Are they receiving raises based on performance? If so, shouldn’t their salaries should be falling too? If your business model is an unsuccessful one, shouldn’t that business model be changed?

Americannodash on May 5, 2010 at 9:51 PM

My name is Democrat. I am a Spend-a-Holic.

TN Mom on May 5, 2010 at 10:27 PM

All this “help” means that they are printing money to pay to freeloaders.

At our expense.

PattyJ on May 5, 2010 at 11:15 PM

NO! NO! F*** NO!

Eren on May 5, 2010 at 11:28 PM

Gee, Dodd could make a good faith move by denying any more bailouts to Freddie. He could show us he means it.

drjohn on May 6, 2010 at 7:23 AM

The last financial crisis we had wasn’t big enough for liberals. It’s still business as usual. Just like 9/11 wasn’t big enough for them. The Big Ones are coming.

keep the change on May 5, 2010 at 8:34 PM

They are so drunk with power. They don’t even care what any of us think anymore.They can just turn off their phones, not go home & hold meetings, & resurrect the dead & bus in the illegals for their voting pleasure.

At what point does this become criminal…?

Seven Percent Solution on May 5, 2010 at 8:11 PM
December 1913.

riverrat10k on May 5, 2010 at 8:56 PM

+100.
The frog has been slowly coming to a boil for so long.
No one understands this.

Badger40 on May 6, 2010 at 8:20 AM

Exit question answer: Until we’re screwed enough by the dems and the economy crashes.

Kissmygrits on May 6, 2010 at 9:22 AM