Is 2010 the Year of the Republican Woman?

posted at 12:58 pm on May 1, 2010 by Ed Morrissey

The national media dubbed 1992 the Year of the Woman in politics, as over 250 women ran for Congress, still a record.  If so, then 2010 could be considered the Year of the Republican Woman.  The Washington Post reports that 270 women have filed for candidacies in House and Senate races — and over 100 of them are Republicans:

Nearly two years after Sarah Palin became the Republican Party’s first female vice presidential nominee, record numbers of Republican women are running for House seats, driving the overall count of women running for both the House and the Senate to a new high.

The surge in female candidates has taken place largely under the radar. The previous high came in 1992, the Year of the Woman, when the percentage of women in Congress reached double digits for the first time. That year, 222 women filed to run for the House and 29 for the Senate.

So far this year, 239 women are candidates for the House and 31 for the Senate, according to data from the Rutgers University’s Center for American Women and Politics. Among them, a record 107 Republican women have filed to run for a House seat, according to the National Republican Congressional Committee — surpassing a previous GOP high of 91 in 1994 and a sharp increase from the 65 who ran in 2008. And those numbers could grow. In each year that Rutgers has been keeping track, the final tally has exceeded the late April figure by more than 20.

Republican women have two significant role models for this new surge in activism. Sarah Palin and Michele Bachmann have toured the country, headlining Tea Party events and becoming spokespeople for the grassroots opposition to the radical Democratic agenda. In my experience at Tea Party events, we seem to get a bigger turnout of women — and women tend to dominate the organizer ranks as well.

That trend could represent a long-term danger for Democrats. In national elections, they have always enjoyed a “gender gap” in support, with women breaking away from the GOP while men break away from Democrats. Bill Clinton won the “soccer mom” vote in his two elections and the 1992 Year of the Woman helped set the stage for that dominance.  A sudden explosion of Republican women challenging for seats held by Democrats could mean a weakening of that edge or its elimination altogether — and without it, they will have a tough time beating Republicans and holding majorities.

Those women will have to win these elections, and as the Post notes, it won’t be easy.  Two-thirds of the Republican women running for Congress are facing Democratic incumbents who intend to run for re-election (only nine are challenging a Republican incumbent).  Traditionally, incumbents win re-election around 90% of the time, so the math here is particularly daunting.  This year, though, most people expect significant turnover — and if the GOP can send dozens of women to Capitol Hill in support of a limited-government agenda, they could realign the women’s vote for the long term.  If Republicans manage to do that, they can thank Palin and Bachmann.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

You betcha we’ll be there.

katy the mean old lady on May 1, 2010 at 1:03 PM

Hope so it seems that much of the leadership in our paty is comming from our women and not our men.

Would finally break down the stereotype of the GOP just being old white men.

William Amos on May 1, 2010 at 1:03 PM

If Palin leads the march, I hope so!!

Tim_B on May 1, 2010 at 1:05 PM

Gosh I hope so! Also it seems vets are running for a lot of r’s seats too. We need to stick to the really good ones and support them any way we can. The rnc probably won’t do much to help, IMO.
L

letget on May 1, 2010 at 1:05 PM

They are women. Hear them roar! ;)

capejasmine on May 1, 2010 at 1:05 PM

2012 will be the year of the Neutered Republican Man.

Where are the fighters withing the GOP? They need Testosterone shots all around.

portlandon on May 1, 2010 at 1:06 PM

Sorry gop men but until you get some intestinal fortitude,conservative women will win!:)

ohiobabe on May 1, 2010 at 1:08 PM

Now where did I put that old Helen Reddy album? (Note to Gen whatevers – we played those on a thing called a turntable).

TxAnn56 on May 1, 2010 at 1:09 PM

Conservative women, like Palin, Bachmann, Cheney, Thatcher and possibly the Arizona Governor I am all about. Republican women, like Snowe, Collins, Scozzafava, Parker or Nina Easton on Fox I can do without.

Daemonocracy on May 1, 2010 at 1:12 PM

TxAnn56 on May 1, 2010 at 1:09 PM

A turntable? So did you spin the record and rap over the lyrics?

Daemonocracy on May 1, 2010 at 1:13 PM

Palin and Bachman are great role models for so many reasons. Even though Pelosi has an historic and powerful position, she doesn’t even come close to a role model. Can’t wait for Liz Cheney to break through and get national attention. I’m holding out for her to become the first female president of the US.

sherry on May 1, 2010 at 1:13 PM

We have a superb Conservative woman running in the primary in NJ6. If anyone can, please lend a hand to Anna Little.

russcote on May 1, 2010 at 1:15 PM

You’d think they would be thanking Palin and Bachmann but the political hacks who sit on Sunday show panels will think it’s because of some other reason why and we shouldn’t listen to Palin and Bachmann because they are stupid right-wing racists.

Chrisin206 on May 1, 2010 at 1:16 PM

Yeah, but these are attractive WHITE girls. They are just Stepford tools of the white male mysogynistic hierarchy and war machine. Nobody will follow them.

JimP on May 1, 2010 at 1:17 PM

Republican women have two significant role models for this new surge in activism. Sarah Palin and Michele Bachmann have toured the country,

And don’t forget increasingly prominent media figures, such as Dana Loesch, Tammy Bruce, and Liz Cheney.

irishspy on May 1, 2010 at 1:18 PM

Where are the fighters withing the GOP?

We have seen the runners. Their names are Spector and Crist.

And isnt just white males in our party with no back bone right Mr Steele ?

William Amos on May 1, 2010 at 1:19 PM

Conservative women are HOT.

Conservative Samizdat on May 1, 2010 at 1:19 PM

Mmmmm, let me think about it……Yeah,sure.
Plus it would be a hoot to tick off the Flicker libs, nationwide.

midlander on May 1, 2010 at 1:19 PM

JimP,
There is Star Parker running in CA(I think that is where she is running), she is black, attractive, and a great woman!
L

letget on May 1, 2010 at 1:21 PM

Conservative women sooooo frakkin rock…..

SHARPTOOTH on May 1, 2010 at 1:22 PM

Playing identity politics with the democrat party is simply dumb. It’s a game they invented, not only did they make the rules, but they get to break them whenever they want without penalty.

According to the liberal narrative, a woman isn’t a woman unless she’s a liberal woman. Same with blacks, gays, , etc. So a republican member of one of the above simply doesn’t “count”.

Much better to completely ignore identity, and highlight what core conservative values are and how they are right for everyone – regardless.

Rebar on May 1, 2010 at 1:22 PM

If Republicans manage to do that, they can thank Palin and Bachmann.

I remember saying that these ladies inspire in ways that the left cant even imagine. The more they attack them, the more activism they inspire. It is because of the reasons these women are attacked, we are them and they are us.
Keep in mind these women are Conservatives. Thats code for grande cojones.

canditaylor68 on May 1, 2010 at 1:23 PM

I heard that KFC in new york wants to honor liberal women, so there haveing a “hillary special”, You get 2 small breast, 2 fat thighs and a left wing…….All for a 1.99$

SHARPTOOTH on May 1, 2010 at 1:26 PM

When the GOP men wimp out their STRONG women step up!

Go Sarah!

So Michele B!

Go Michelle M.!

profitsbeard on May 1, 2010 at 1:31 PM

We can save the country.

Chip on May 1, 2010 at 1:32 PM

Good news today from here in New Hampshire…former State Attorney General Kelly Ayotte has now widened her lead over her Democrat opponent, current US Rep Paul Hodes, in their race for Judd Gregg’s Senate seat. She now leads 47% to 32%, but 21% are still undecided.

US Rep Carole Che-Porter (D-Loon) is now trailing her opponent, Manchester Mayor Frank Guinta, by 4 points.

And in NH’s 2nd congressional district, former Rep. Charlie Bass (R) leads both Democratic candidates in his bid for his former House seat. Bass defeats 2002 Democratic Looney Toon nominee “Hurricane” Katrina Swett (D), 44 percent to 27 percent (Katrina’s got a fine Democrat pedigree-she’s the daughter of the late Democrat Looney Toon from CA, Tom Lantos).

Bass also defeats attorney Ann McLane Kuster by a smaller margin, 42 percent to 30 percent. Bass’ chief primary competition, 2008 GOP nominee Jennifer Horn, is in a statistical tie with both Democrats.

Del Dolemonte on May 1, 2010 at 1:32 PM

In South Dakota, Kristi Noem is fighting to defeat Dem Stephanie Herseth Sandlin a “blue dog”. She can definitely win!

http://kristiforcongress.com/

UncleBubba on May 1, 2010 at 1:35 PM

It has to be the women. Republican men have no balls.

SurferDoc on May 1, 2010 at 1:39 PM

As women made an overwhelming percentage of the PUMA movement outraged by the treatment of Hillary by the MSM and the Obama campaign, there is a wonderful opportunity to woo these women. The PUMA’s motto often was ‘country before party’ and of the Scoop Jackson brand of Democrats as opposed to the Progressive wing that currently dominates.

A concentrated effort at reaching out to these women by the GOP would be a strategically brillant move going into ’10 & ’12, but the likes of Steele sand that bunch having the brains to implement such a program are dubious at best. Someone else is going to have make the pitch to them.

Calling Michelle Malkin….

Archimedes on May 1, 2010 at 1:41 PM

It looks like Nevada will replace Harry Reid with a woman. There are two strong ones running.

AlanC on May 1, 2010 at 1:41 PM

Playing identity politics with the democrat party is simply dumb. It’s a game they invented, not only did they make the rules, but they get to break them whenever they want without penalty.
According to the liberal narrative, a woman isn’t a woman unless she’s a liberal woman. Same with blacks, gays, , etc. So a republican member of one of the above simply doesn’t “count”.

They play that game so well because the Democrats are the “Party of Projection”

They see Racism everywhere because it is inherent in their fundamental thinking.

They see Sexism everywhere because that to is inherent in their fundamental thinking.

They see National Socialism everywhere because that is also inherent in their fundamental thinking.

Much better to completely ignore identity, and highlight what core conservative values are and how they are right for everyone – regardless.
Rebar on May 1, 2010 at 1:22 PM

You are perfectly correct, let the Leftist obsess about Race and Gender, we judge people based on the content of their character.

Chip on May 1, 2010 at 1:44 PM

Speaking of Michelle Bachmann, I was listening to her interviewed on some radio show (it would figure it is was Medved) and she was going on about how great Mark Kirk is.

For those of you too proud to descend into the dreary world of Illinois politicians, Kirk is a RINO-Douchebag par excellence. He has an under 50% ACU rating over the past term, a Cap and Trade vote under his belt, and a whole series of social-policy positions that put him somewhere just left of Nancy Pelosi.

His claim to conservatism is that he is a fiscal-restraint guy and has a weekend career in the Naval Reserve. Of course, his vote against the Iraq surge and his vote for Cap and Trade sort of put those claims in perspective, don’t they.

My point — WTF is wrong with Bachmann? This guy is well to the left of Crist, and about as bad as Specter. Snowe and Collins have nothing on him.

Jaibones on May 1, 2010 at 1:46 PM

It is not just limited to women on the national scale either. Many Conservative women are running for state and local offices because they have realized that it is just as Rush has often said, the states are our last lines of defense.

If you are in MN there is an awesome woman running for MN Senate District 10 and her name is Gretchen Hoffman. Look her up if you are in MN.

http://gretchenhoffman.com/

I am in MS and I think she is GREAT! Wish I could vote for her. We need to get to know these people running for these types of elections because they will be the future for what ails D.C.

freeus on May 1, 2010 at 1:50 PM

Women used to traditionally be the core of Democratic workers, too. I’ve wondered how it worked out for the local levels. A lot of women were very disappointed in the party and how her candidacy was handled.

Personally, I think a lot of the GOP men haven’t impressed me with how they have handled Palin news bits that are obviously unfair. I’m underwhelmed by their pick, too.

AnninCA on May 1, 2010 at 1:52 PM

As women made an overwhelming percentage of the PUMA movement outraged by the treatment of Hillary by the MSM and the Obama campaign, there is a wonderful opportunity to woo these women. The PUMA’s motto often was ‘country before party’ and of the Scoop Jackson brand of Democrats as opposed to the Progressive wing that currently dominates.

Exactly. I’m not feeling overly wooed by far-right conservatives, but I do nearly always respect Palin’s positions, even though I disagree with some of her politics.

As a person, however, she’s already definitely earned my attention. I AM definitely watching her carefully. I think her leadership skills are phenomenal already, and she’s learning very fast how to handle the press.

AnninCA on May 1, 2010 at 1:54 PM

All I can say is that, as far as the GOP goes, the women — even the liberal ones like Olympia Snowe — have more stones than the men. It is a very sad state of affairs.

DaydreamBeliever on May 1, 2010 at 2:00 PM

My point — WTF is wrong with Bachmann? This guy is well to the left of Crist, and about as bad as Specter. Snowe and Collins have nothing on him.

Jaibones on May 1, 2010 at 1:46 PM

Bachmann is mearly recognizing some political realities thta’s all, there are no other viable candidates that are any better. I hold Kirk in as great disdain as espouse, but the prospect of Goulliannas, a demostrable hack of what John Kass has labeled The Illinois Combine (of which Kirk is too) and his connections developed as Banker-to-the-Mob would be an utter disaster for Illinois.

As much as it diturbs me to to vote for Kirk, sometimes the lesser of evils is the only choice.

Archimedes on May 1, 2010 at 2:01 PM

They are just Stepford tools of the white male mysogynistic hierarchy and war machine. Nobody will follow them.
JimP on May 1, 2010 at 1:17 PM

Self-parody alert!

rrpjr on May 1, 2010 at 2:23 PM

UncleBubba on May 1, 2010 at 1:35 PM

That is so HOT!

Mirimichi on May 1, 2010 at 2:28 PM

Drill Baby Drill!

huckleberryfriend on May 1, 2010 at 2:33 PM

What’s with having comments turned off on the post about the NYT criticizing Comrade Zero? Not that I had a great comment; it’s just the principle of the thing.

Cicero43 on May 1, 2010 at 2:34 PM

I am beyond thrilled at all the strong conservative women in modern politics. In my 35 years of voting in the OC, I had a conservative female nominee to vote for at the national level exactly twice. One was Sarah Palin and the other was a GOP candidate who lost to Loretta Sanchez, who thankfully is no longer my Congressional representative. In California, the GOP has a female candidate for governor. Meg Whitman, and for the Senate, Carly Fiorina, and neither is my first choice against more conservative male candidates.

Growing up, Clare Booth Luce was the only female conservative role model I had in politics until Margaret Thatcher and Jeane Kirkpatrick and, by the time I was born, Luce

Terrie on May 1, 2010 at 2:34 PM

Terrie on May 1, 2010 at 2:34 PM

I don’t anything about the governor race in CA, but I do like Chuck DeVore for senator. I have been contributing to him. In your opinion, should I continue to do so?

Mirimichi on May 1, 2010 at 2:38 PM

AP: Arousing, yet strangely intimidating…

abobo on May 1, 2010 at 2:39 PM

It’s about time.

The Republican men have lost their testosterone and ability to have a stiff spine when standing up to the rape of our country.

Mommynator on May 1, 2010 at 2:42 PM

As much as it diturbs me to to vote for Kirk, sometimes the lesser of evils is the only choice.

Archimedes on May 1, 2010 at 2:01 PM

No, it’s absolutely true that Kirk is the only choice in Illinois, partly because both the ILGOP (which is worthless) and the RSCC endorsed and funded Kirk the instant that he announced.

But I will certainly vote for him rather than allow the Democrat clown Giannoulias to go to the Senate. He’s not qualified to be an alderman.

Jaibones on May 1, 2010 at 2:53 PM

Archimedes on May 1, 2010 at 1:41 PM

Problem is that many Hillary voters still have no problem with what her husband did in the Oral Office as President.

Del Dolemonte on May 1, 2010 at 3:07 PM

Don’t forget or underestimate Liz Cheney.

Bambi on May 1, 2010 at 3:21 PM

Yes it is their year and thank God for them.

tim c on May 1, 2010 at 3:23 PM

And don’t forget increasingly prominent media figures, such as Dana Loesch, Tammy Bruce, and Liz Cheney.

irishspy on May 1, 2010 at 1:18 PM

Dana Loesch: Who?
Tammy Bruce: Ugh!
Liz Cheney: Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh yeah! Bachmann/Cheney 2016, baby!

KS Rex on May 1, 2010 at 3:33 PM

Iowa’s AG Tom Miller (D) is going to lose to Brenna Findley(R)!
she was Steve King’s Chief of Staff.
She is what we need, a Conservative through and through.

IowaWoman on May 1, 2010 at 4:12 PM

Dana Loesch: Who?
Tammy Bruce: Ugh!
Liz Cheney: Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh yeah! Bachmann/Cheney 2016, baby!

Believe me if you ever saw Dana Loesch you would like her. She’s the real deal

Chrisin206 on May 1, 2010 at 4:19 PM

A woman in a position of leadership has to be strong, principled (even if we disagree with her principles), vocal, and to a certain extent, relentless. There are many reasons for that, both cultural and inherent.

Men can obtain positions of leadership with much less relentlessness and strength of character. Therefore, while I believe some men in DC are leaders, many of them are simply politicians. The president included.

Pelosi–though I loathe her leadership and bemoan her principles–has the above qualities. So does Hillary. So do almost all powerful women. They have to exhibit them to gain those positions…which is why we’re remarking that the women seem to have more “stones” than the men in DC.

(And this is in no way a feminist whine…au contraire. But I just live in the real world, where men are men and women are women, and have varied strengths and challenges, generally).

Grace_is_sufficient on May 1, 2010 at 4:26 PM

Somewhat off topic, but why is there a “Tell Discovery NO Palin!” sponsored Facebook group?

What, they now are so afraid of her they can’t endure a travelogue that highlights her state?

Sharr on May 1, 2010 at 4:30 PM

Bachmann is mearly recognizing some political realities thta’s all…

Archimedes on May 1, 2010 at 2:01 PM

Back to my main point — her comments were a totally unforced error. This wasn’t “Michelle, what do you do with a RINO like Kirk in Illinois? Let the idiot liberal win, or support the RINO?”

It was completely out of the blue, that’s why it was so weird to me.

Jaibones on May 1, 2010 at 4:34 PM

And yes, Dana Loesch is cute as hell.

Jaibones on May 1, 2010 at 4:35 PM

Liz Cheney = smart, intelligent, competent. Yes.

Michelle Bachman = smart, bright. Sometimes a little hysterical. Not ready for VP or something but she is on course.

Gabriella (see above thread): Most inspirational and sensical speaker I have heard in a long time.

Sarah Palin: Not bright. Quitter. Embarrassment. Speaks in sound bites. Was pregnant when she got married. Cost McCain many votes on a net net basis. Will be a thorn in the side of intelligent conservatism for some time in the future.

YOU’RE WELCOME!!!

FlickeringFlame on May 1, 2010 at 4:58 PM

It’s the year of the Republican black congressmen. If the 37 who’re running win, Maxine Waters will change the name of the CBC because that club is for liberal blacks only.

Teh, heh, the liberals and the media…sorry for the repeat.

Schadenfreude on May 1, 2010 at 5:07 PM

If Sarah Palin is a role model than I guess we can expect the new crop of R womens to cowardly bail halfway through their terms to pursue lucrative yet useless spokesmodel careers.

happyfeet on May 1, 2010 at 5:57 PM

I heard that KFC in new york wants to honor liberal women, so there haveing a “hillary special”, You get 2 small breast, 2 fat thighs and a left wing…….All for a 1.99$

SHARPTOOTH on May 1, 2010 at 1:26 PM

And a beak that wont stop chattering.

Hey, its got to be the year of something. It certianly isnt the WHITE MALE.

johnnyU on May 1, 2010 at 6:18 PM

*then* I guess I mean

happyfeet on May 1, 2010 at 6:25 PM

Well it is about fricking time! If the Enquirer gossip about Obama bears fruit, it will solidify the cause and conservative women will rule the day!!

mathscience41 on May 1, 2010 at 6:27 PM

Only filling a void, boys.

PrincipledPilgrim on May 1, 2010 at 7:42 PM

Thats a big 10-4,er,YES IT IS!

This time around,tho,the Republican Women will show
Nancy Pelosi how to really clean the House!!!

canopfor on May 1, 2010 at 7:44 PM

FlickeringFlame on May 1, 2010 at 4:58 PM

happyfeet on May 1, 2010 at 5:57 PM

Dumb and dumber show up right on cue to fling poo on everyone, including Ed. If anything is “useless”, it is these people. Yawn.

Brian1972 on May 1, 2010 at 7:53 PM

heard that KFC in new york wants to honor liberal women, so there haveing a “hillary special”, You get 2 small breast, 2 fat thighs and a left wing…….All for a 1.99$

SHARPTOOTH on May 1, 2010 at 1:26 PM

+100

cableguy615 on May 1, 2010 at 7:57 PM

I can’t believe 6 hours of comments on this thread and noone’s mentioned my congressperson, Marsha Blackburn? 57 years old and still hot!

PatMac on May 1, 2010 at 8:26 PM

I can’t believe 6 hours of comments on this thread and noone’s mentioned my congressperson, Marsha Blackburn? 57 years old and still hot!

PatMac on May 1, 2010 at 8:26 PM

Marsha, Marsha, Marsha!

I like Rep Blackburn a lot. My district is neighboring hers to the west. I’ve been stuck with phony blue dog Democrat John Tanner until he saw the writing on the wall last fall and announced he’s out after this term. Kinda disappointed me, because I was looking forward to whipping his a$$ straight up. At least he’s gone.

Brian1972 on May 1, 2010 at 8:31 PM

Sarah Palin: Not bright. Quitter. Embarrassment. Speaks in sound bites. Was pregnant when she got married. Cost McCain many votes on a net net basis. Will be a thorn in the side of intelligent conservatism for some time in the future.

YOU’RE WELCOME!!!

FlickeringFlame on May 1, 2010 at 4:58 PM

YOU’RE WELCOME!!!

FlickeringFlame on May 1, 2010 at 4:58 PM

Sarah Palin: Not bright.

Based on what criteria? Standard testing? Compared to whom?

Quitter.

Lame; this meme is done to death; she resigned her governorship for well-explained reasons.

Embarrassment.

To whom?

Speaks in sound bites.

Your not reading her facebook posts, or her op-eds, which are chock-full of policy specifics, laid out in a non-sound-bite fashion.

Was pregnant when she got married.

Irrelevant, pointless, and stupid

Cost McCain many votes on a net net basis.

Cite the specific proof of this. Show your work.

Will be a thorn in the side of intelligent conservatism for some time in the future.

In what specific way? How do you define intelligent conservatism? Who would you consider it’s spokespeople? Why is there not room for both a motivated, energized spokeswoman, and some essays in a more scholarly style?

Posting without proofs and supports is not really moving the argument, Roger.

massrighty on May 1, 2010 at 9:25 PM

PALIN BACHMANN 2012

Yep,

Kini on May 1, 2010 at 11:25 PM

CUDA
BACHMANN

Metro on May 1, 2010 at 11:28 PM

And watch Sharron Angle in the NV GOP primary!!! Recently endorsed by TEA Party Express, Mark Levin, and 20 other groups and conservative notables.

She sometimes packs a 44 Magnum, holds 3 state weight-lifting records, and won the Ronald Reagan Freedom Medallion for defending the NV state constitution against ALL THREE branches of her own state government (see Angle v. Guinn at SCOTUS).

She has won all of NV’s county GOP straw polls except Nye. She beat Lowden and Tarkanian in Clark county (Las Vegas) – Lowden and Tark have won a grand total of ZERO GOP county straw polls.

fred5678 on May 2, 2010 at 2:28 AM

And please don’t let Meghan McCain self appoint her self as the spokesman for republican women. Just make her finally go away.

Blake on May 2, 2010 at 3:49 AM

Interesting, but in our small rural town, women on the ballot tend to kick butt. All politics is local. It seemingly has nothing to do with national trends – or does it? The women in our town truly network. Womens Club, PTO and the like. Then they campaign and vote for each other. Have been surprisingly successful in a place where one would not expect women to be in power. Let’s hope our small town is trend-setting.

humdinger on May 2, 2010 at 11:51 AM

I don’t get into identity politics. I don’t care what their sex or race is. When it comes to running for public office the only thing that should matter is that they have principles guided by an adherence to the Constitution.

Yakko77 on May 2, 2010 at 12:31 PM

Liz Carter is running against Hank Johnson in GA. Not only can we prove that Guam can stay upright, but we can take back the seat that once belonged to Cynthia McKinney!

Animator Girl on May 3, 2010 at 10:12 AM

Vicky Hartzler is the conservative favorite to challenge Ike Skelton in Missouri’s Fourth District. Spike Ike! Vote Vicky!

alwaysfiredup on May 3, 2010 at 3:24 PM