Crist: I’m following Lincoln’s advice or something
posted at 4:45 pm on April 30, 2010 by Allahpundit
Question: Is there a single pundit anywhere on the conservative spectrum who still supports this tool? All the center-righties I’ve read are emphatically opposed, from Frum to John Avlon to Ross Douthat, who makes this trenchant point about electing careerists when there’s an entitlements tidal wave racing towards shore:
No doubt there will be some talk, in the wake of Charlie Crist’s completely unsurprising decision to run for Florida’s Senate seat as an independent, about how this shows that the intolerant Tea Party spirit is driving moderates out of the Republican Party. As I’ve argued before, this is exactly the wrong way to look at the case of Charlie Crist. The Florida governor may be a moderate in some sense, but his real loyalties are to cynicism, self-interest (though this time, I’m pretty sure that he’s misjudged where those interests lie), and the persistent pursuit of the budgetary free lunch. At a time when the country desperately needs politicians who are equipped to make tough choices, Crist’s record suggests that he’s the last person that anyone — conservative or liberal — should want to see in a position of responsibility in Washington D.C.
Quite so. In fact, look no further than that Fox News Sunday debate held a few weeks ago for proof. When pressed on social security reform, Rubio insisted that raising the retirement age has to be on the table — a ballsy stance given Florida’s demographics, needless to say. Care to guess where Sunshine Charlie came down on the same issue?
Today’s meme du jour is that Crist, by splitting the Republican vote, could propel Meek to victory, but have a look at this fascinating new poll. Yeah, Crist leads, but don’t focus on that. Focus on this:
The poll shows Crist taking more votes from Meek than Rubio. Crist actually does better with Democrats than Meek, with 41 percent of them saying they would vote for him compared to 31 percent for Meek.
Crist pulls in 22 percent of Republicans, compared to 56 percent for Rubio.
While Crist projects himself as a conservative/moderate, he gets more support from people who consider themselves liberals than Meek – 43 percent to 33 percent.
Crist pulls in 36 percent support from blacks, compared to 45 percent for Meek.
Remember, according to yesterday’s projections, Crist would need roughly 30 percent of the vote from both Democrats and Republicans in order to stand a chance in November. As it is, he’s already well under the mark among GOPers and is bound to collapse among Dems (especially black voters) as Meek’s name recognition spreads. Not only that but, surprisingly for an incumbent governor, he didn’t have much of an organization in place before yesterday’s big switch; now that people are bailing out, including cronies who owe their careers to him, it’s bound to be even more bare-bones. Oh, and thanks to the vagaries of Florida’s election laws, his name’s set to appear no higher than ninth on the ballot in the fall. Says pollster Jim McLaughlin, “I would make a pretty good bet he not only will not win, he will run an embarrassing third.” Indeed.
Here he is this morning on “Today” name-checking Lincoln and and describing his sudden intellectual awakening to the fact that primaries necessarily limit voters’ options in November. One mild surprise: Meredith Vieira practically begs him to follow Specter’s lead by saying that he didn’t leave the party, the darned wingnuttified party left him, but Crist doesn’t take the bait. No matter how much Republicans hate him, he still needs that 30 percent of GOPers, so don’t expect many attacks from him on the party at large. Fun to watch, though.
Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
Update: Actually, this video’s even more fun. Five different interviewers are playing a tune here. Dance, Charlie, dance!
Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
Related Posts:









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3
barky isn’t a shooter, he’s more of a ball handler.
VegasRick on May 20, 2013 at 5:35 PM
Ouch. :)
Bob's Kid on May 21, 2013 at 1:11 AM
Oh, if only dear leader Stalin knew of these atrocities he’d certainly stop them…
Pull the other one.
I agree with you, whether Barky knew or not is “Irrelevant”.
Except in my mind even if it’s the crew who scuttled her, the captain goes down with the ship. In your mind, he gets a promotion.
Difficultas_Est_Imperium on May 21, 2013 at 1:41 AM
Obama, head of the Neo-Know Nothing Party.
Sgt. Schultz, chief of staff.
I KNOW NOTHING, NOTHING!
profitsbeard on May 21, 2013 at 3:36 AM
Oh, I so needed this. Thank you.
athenadelphi on May 21, 2013 at 4:15 AM
This is simply not believable. It seems Obama and his minions are all too young to have learned the lessons of Watergate.
claudius on May 21, 2013 at 8:57 AM
That is precisely why they are able to use law as legal passes, such as “I don’t recall,” I did not know,” I drank too much tea” “No one informed me. I first saw this travesty on Fox none-news.”
Under oath, that would shift rapidly to: “Under advisement of my attorney, I plead the fifth amendment.”
Don L on May 21, 2013 at 9:02 AM
From the Sopranos:
It’s not good to go into the unknown, not knowin’.
claudius on May 21, 2013 at 9:02 AM
L*I*A*R
easyt65 on May 21, 2013 at 9:34 AM
Obama runs the white House like a terrorist cell! He probably uses couriers to communicate with his cohorts in other cells of the government! Find the couriers, water board them, and you’ve caught him in his crimes! Ha!
Marco on May 21, 2013 at 9:50 AM
But what if the President not only knew about it, but started it…?
President met with anti-Tea Party IRS union chief the day before agency targeted Tea Party.
dominigan on May 21, 2013 at 10:24 AM
Good question. Had this been any republican, bayam would call it proof, as undeniable as the sun rising in the east.
But bayam will simply pretend that it proves nothing, there is no smoke and therefore no fire. Hypocrite practices hypocrisy, who’s surprised?
On the other hand, bayam’s statement could be interpreted as stating that obama is responsible and should be held accountable. Is that what you’re saying bayam?
runawayyyy on May 21, 2013 at 10:40 AM
Two words: Valerie Jarrett
Pomai on May 21, 2013 at 1:37 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3