Video: Apparently “ObamaCare” is a derogatory term now
posted at 5:00 pm on April 22, 2010 by Allahpundit
Yeah, I don’t get it either but Newsweek’s pretty sure that Jon Stewart’s right, so QED. Jim Treacher:
If “Obamacare” is derogatory, who or what is being derogated? Is this “health care reform” being impugned by its association with Obama? Or is Obama being insulted by associating him with it? Presumably Jon Stewart is in favor of both. So where’s the disparagement? Which one is being brought down by the other?
Stewart likens this phrase to using “teabaggers” to describe members of the Tea Party. Is he really comparing Barack Obama, the President of the United States, to the practice of dipping one’s testicles into another person’s mouth?
Frankly, I suspect the only reason the White House doesn’t use the term itself is because it would sound like they’re taking too much of the credit for the bill’s passage. Given The One’s vow that Democrats will campaign on the glories of this galactic boondoggle in November, you would think he’d be simply itching to slap his brand on it. As it is, I think the logic works like this: “ObamaCare” is a term primarily used by conservatives, and conservatives aren’t real fond of The One or his new law, and it’s just not nice of them to feel that way, ergo this is a smear on par with calling an old lady holding a “Don’t Tread On Me” flag at a protest a “teabagger.” Or maybe I’m overthinking this: Maybe it’s just the left waking up to the fact of how unpopular the law is and doing what little it can to remove Obama’s fingerprints from it. You make the call.
Exit question: If Newsweek thinks “ObamaCare” should be verboten, what are we to make of this headline?









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »
Third: Instead of discussing the problems with the bill, latch onto a “look, here’s a squirrel” dispute in an attempt to derail the conversation.
It is the stupid party, after all.
lorien1973 on April 22, 2010 at 5:03 PM
I thought it was a winner if it passed.
the_nile on April 22, 2010 at 5:04 PM
Like I said in the headlines – now that even the lefties see what a POS the bill is, they don’t want their hero associated with it.
Vashta.Nerada on April 22, 2010 at 5:04 PM
I thought Obamacare was a BFD?
Why would Obamacare be a bad thing?
Mr. Joe on April 22, 2010 at 5:04 PM
Actually, since Romney is a Republican, I think the MSM would be fine calling it NaziCare.
AUINSC on April 22, 2010 at 5:04 PM
Hmmmmm
Does anyone see any difference in Obama/Romney care? Call me a teabagger.. heck call me gay, it isn’t like I am the racist.
upinak on April 22, 2010 at 5:05 PM
Lobbing Obama’s name off the front of this monstrosity is futile. Barry pissed the bed, and now wants the nation to sleep in the wet spot.
Well too bad Barry. You sleep in it.
portlandon on April 22, 2010 at 5:05 PM
I have no problems calling it The Sh*tcare Bill.
Denverslim on April 22, 2010 at 5:05 PM
Let’s call it ObaggerCare for a while, and see how that flies.
Vashta.Nerada on April 22, 2010 at 5:05 PM
Semantics: liberals live by it.
Liberalism became derogatory so they changed to progressives.
Global warming became climate change.
Cap and Trade will be changed soon.
carbon_footprint on April 22, 2010 at 5:07 PM
Obama likely doesn’t want his name linked to it. The other reason is that calling it “health care reform” sounds more appealing.
Doughboy on April 22, 2010 at 5:07 PM
Look it’s simple. You’re not supposed to speak the lord’s name out loud. It’s heresy.
Dave_d on April 22, 2010 at 5:07 PM
Port that isn’t pee. MOVE MAN MOVE!
upinak on April 22, 2010 at 5:07 PM
Yeah to Vat and Barter.
upinak on April 22, 2010 at 5:08 PM
This one, the dems don’t want to talk about it anymore. They were promised a bounce that didn’t materialize, the revenge of the Clenis.
farright on April 22, 2010 at 5:08 PM
ObamaCare. ObamaCare. ObamaCare.
Bingo.
amerpundit on April 22, 2010 at 5:09 PM
Perhaps Leibowitz would prefer the term ‘SoetoroCare’.
BHO Jonestown on April 22, 2010 at 5:09 PM
Oh need to finish this. Of course this makes sense since Jon and too many on the left basically worship the guy.
Dave_d on April 22, 2010 at 5:10 PM
Funny, when they build a new pro baseball stadium, like they just did in Minneapolis for the Twins, companies compete to get their name on it. The winner in the case of the Twins was Target Stores. Target is happy. The fans are happy. Everybody’s happy.
RBMN on April 22, 2010 at 5:10 PM
I nominate a less offensive name: The American Healthcare Serfdom Act.
Cicero43 on April 22, 2010 at 5:10 PM
Hey, call it MuhammadCare®. Then Stewart couldn’t even say the name on Comedy Central.
jon1979 on April 22, 2010 at 5:12 PM
It’s all marketing. ObamaCare is too political, they much rather you refer to it as “wonderful health coverage for all that reduces the budget deficit, expands your coverage, and improves quality-care”.
PackerBronco on April 22, 2010 at 5:12 PM
Liberals knew the O-Care bill’s unpopularity but pushed it through anyway, details unknown. With the provisions now fully available, they realize just how bad a mess it’s going to be and so don’t want it associated with their hero-in-chief.
This is the same as when some college professor said it’s racist to call Obow ‘professor’.
Like it or not, the Left owns Obow and therefore Obamacare.
Liam on April 22, 2010 at 5:13 PM
Dear Leader Care?
RBMN on April 22, 2010 at 5:14 PM
How’s about MarxistObamacare? Is that better, Jon?
kingsjester on April 22, 2010 at 5:14 PM
Own it!
Remember v1.0 was called HillaryCare.
Vigilante on April 22, 2010 at 5:16 PM
OmamaCrap?
rickyricardo on April 22, 2010 at 5:16 PM
More epistemic closure.
RedRedRice on April 22, 2010 at 5:17 PM
As I said elsewhere, the term Obamacare isn’t in any way, shape or form derogatory in itself.
It is the utter scorn with which that term often uttered that Stewart and the other arbiters of civility find distressful.
Finding it impossible to ban conservative scorn, they are attempting to make the term which lends itself to that scorn off-limits.
novaculus on April 22, 2010 at 5:17 PM
It will be easier to fight without that nickname. There are many people who oppose it, but like Obama personally.
exception on April 22, 2010 at 5:17 PM
Maybe you don’t understand. The point is: “Shut up”
ObamaCare is the new n-word. So shut up. Why? Shut up.
Kohath on April 22, 2010 at 5:18 PM
Yeah, that’s it.
If we need to change the name to appease Jon Stewart though, I vote for “Control-Care”, or maybe “No-Care”
forest on April 22, 2010 at 5:18 PM
NObama Left Behind
Christien on April 22, 2010 at 5:19 PM
How about the Fannie Mae Freddie Mac Health Transformation of 2010.
rob verdi on April 22, 2010 at 5:19 PM
Well, maybe since there was absolutely no actual health care reform in this bill, Obamacare is more fitting.
I guess they can call it Insurance-and-pages-of-sneaky-pieces-of-legislation-care, but Obamacare is much easier.
reaganaut on April 22, 2010 at 5:19 PM
Again, it is a misnomer. There’s nothing “caring” about it.
It will always be Barry’s Big Medical System to me.
Rae on April 22, 2010 at 5:19 PM
I just call it what it is:
CommieCare.
Dave R. on April 22, 2010 at 5:19 PM
I am pretty sure that fairly soon just mentioning Obama’s name will be considered derogatory unless it is immediately followed with a phrase like “our great leader”.
Either you are in the collective or you are not. Not in? Then anything and everything you say is immediately deemed derogatory in nature.
MississippiMom on April 22, 2010 at 5:19 PM
How about Dumbassincompetentfarleftparttimesenatorwhoneverhadarealjobinhislifeandisignorantofbasiceconomicprinciplesandisapetulantthinskinnednarcissistwhocan’tpronouncethewordcorpsCare,Jon?
Dr. Carlo Lombardi on April 22, 2010 at 5:21 PM
It should be called Obama’care’, and it s/b derogatory.
Schadenfreude on April 22, 2010 at 5:21 PM
Democrat preferred title: The Mysterious Healthcare Reform Bill That Showed Up, Passed Itself and Somehow Is Now The Law.
Cicero43 on April 22, 2010 at 5:22 PM
ObamaBoondoggle ,
Obama caused disaster ,
deathpanel
the_nile on April 22, 2010 at 5:22 PM
LOL
The text ran over the border of the box.
Dr. Carlo Lombardi on April 22, 2010 at 5:22 PM
Romneycare = AOK
Obamacare = despicable incivility (racist!!!)
And if you can’t tell the difference, you troglodytes, you must be Republicans or (gasp!) Teabaggers!!!
novaculus on April 22, 2010 at 5:23 PM
That the MSM is preparing to torpedo him on RomneyCare, due to the public’s hatred of ObamaCare not waning.
And that’s just fine. It would have killed him eventually. Get Mitt out of the way now so we can get someone for president who’s less of a huckster than the incumbent.
MadisonConservative on April 22, 2010 at 5:23 PM
Forget Anninca you, it’s now Obamacare you.
Better yet ……. My dog just took a Obamacare on the rug.
Jerome Horwitz on April 22, 2010 at 5:23 PM
ForceFedMed
Christien on April 22, 2010 at 5:23 PM
Newsweak was “pretty sure” that Bill Clinton wasn’t sexually exploiting a female workplace subordinate, too. Which is why they spiked the story.
Del Dolemonte on April 22, 2010 at 5:26 PM
I was shocked that you didn’t run with this title Allahpundit.
Jon Stewart’s getting a bad rap on the “ObamaCare” comment.
portlandon on April 22, 2010 at 5:28 PM
Stewart’s thinking here doesn’t make sense.
His guest - guest - uses the term “Obamacare” and he (Stewart) doesn’t like it. So that entitles Stewart to call his guest – guest – a “teabagger.”
Again: Stewart gets to insult his guest – guest – because his guest somehow insulted who? Obama? Healthcare? What?
Yeah, Stewart is smart and funny but he really comes across here as petty and small. And I’m a fan of his (in small doses).
SteveMG on April 22, 2010 at 5:28 PM
SpreadtheHealth
Christien on April 22, 2010 at 5:28 PM
Now before I say this, yes, maybe some “satirists” on the right can be labeled this as well given my description.
John Stewart is a coward. So is Bill Maher. Chris Matthews not so much.
You see, the more I think about it, guys like John and Bill can easily run under the cover of satire and “comedy” when the s&#$! starts flying because of some inane, insulting comment they have made.
Social commentators and pundits cannot. Ann Coulter and Sarah Palin have volumes more guts and courage than these two sniveling curs. They stand up to their critics with a belief in their ideology that they defend proudly.
When has Stewart or Maher proudly stated their liberal, progressive bona-fides? When have they openly admitted their ideology, period. Folks like Coulter and Palin always state “I am a Conservative” “I believe in______”.
When was the last time the two caitiffs have?
If they say anything that creates a huge backlash, they run for the satire cave and roll up into a ball.
O’Reilly nailed it last night. Stewart truly hates and despises Conservatives, Republicans and the Tea Party. He wraps it the sugar coat of Comedy Central, but make no mistake, if he could, with a snap of his fingers, make us drop dead, he would be snapping like a harmony group on a New Orleans street corner.
From time to time, his true rage comes out and then he drops in the ice cube of comedy to pull it back with a “I’m not that serious” connotation, but what I would pay to see is a guest really, really go after him and show the world how truly small this man really is, intellectually and character-wise
Opposite Day on April 22, 2010 at 5:30 PM
IRScare
farright on April 22, 2010 at 5:30 PM
So was HillaryCare sexist…somehow?
russcote on April 22, 2010 at 5:30 PM
No one made a stink when Kennedy’s name was attached to it.
The Ugly American on April 22, 2010 at 5:30 PM
How about UselessTurdCare?
Thinking Americans will get it, liberals won’t.
Vashta.Nerada on April 22, 2010 at 5:31 PM
Newsweek should be honestly labeled Newspeak.
jukin on April 22, 2010 at 5:31 PM
That’s what I think. Obama & the Dems know this is toxic.
Why did he stop his great PR tour to sell the bill to country? I’d really like to know.
They’re all going to distance themselves from this bill to try to run for reelection.
Obama included. He’ll be busy blaming Pelosi and Reid for the bad consequences.
INC on April 22, 2010 at 5:31 PM
Obamalamadingdongcare? Or is that racist?
clement on April 22, 2010 at 5:32 PM
How about NobamaCare? Accurately describes what will be happening.
mwdiver on April 22, 2010 at 5:33 PM
MoroniCare.
portlandon on April 22, 2010 at 5:35 PM
Apparently, Paul Harvey was a hater too.
The Ugly American on April 22, 2010 at 5:35 PM
Stewart certainly ain’t no Mark Twain. He ain’t no Groucho. He ain’t even a Fred Sanford.
MB4 on April 22, 2010 at 5:35 PM
How about Law and Order Care?
rob verdi on April 22, 2010 at 5:36 PM
TerminalCare.
ZimbabweCare.
ObamasMonster.
MichelesRevenge.
MB4 on April 22, 2010 at 5:38 PM
HusseinCare.
portlandon on April 22, 2010 at 5:38 PM
ObamaCareMorticiansDelight
MB4 on April 22, 2010 at 5:39 PM
Big F***ing Deal Care
farright on April 22, 2010 at 5:40 PM
ObamaSnare
MB4 on April 22, 2010 at 5:40 PM
ObamaEuthanasia
Obamahanasia
MB4 on April 22, 2010 at 5:42 PM
Obamascare
sandee on April 22, 2010 at 5:42 PM
WeDon’tCare
portlandon on April 22, 2010 at 5:42 PM
ObamaScroomage
MB4 on April 22, 2010 at 5:42 PM
I suppose that as the mounting deficits become even more alarming to even more Americans, the term Obamanomics will also be derogatory enough that Democrats will refuse to use it and attack Republicans for using it because it will be politically effective, similar to death panels.
Liberals don’t really mention Reaganomics anymore do they? That turned out to be a positive connotation to all but the most dedicated liberal propaganda consumers.
Brian1972 on April 22, 2010 at 5:43 PM
This demonstrates the power of linking Obamacare to this Regime, and just how wrong the Regime was in saying people would love Obamacare once it passed.
GaltBlvnAtty on April 22, 2010 at 5:44 PM
Jon Stewart has a kindly feeling for idiots, and a compassion for them, on account of personal experience and heredity.
- Mark Twain
MB4 on April 22, 2010 at 5:46 PM
That’s the ticket!
What should we call their attempt at a Statist control of the Financial industry?
ObamaBanking?
ObamaStreet?
ObamaFinance?
Chip on April 22, 2010 at 5:48 PM
Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were Jon Stewart. But I repeat myself.
- Mark Twain
MB4 on April 22, 2010 at 5:49 PM
ObamaScroomage
Scroomage = the result of being scroomed.
Scroomed = screwed + doomed.
MB4 on April 22, 2010 at 5:52 PM
Its derogatory because it is insinuating a Big Brother type aspect to it and just sounds childish. Is it really so hard to just call it Obama’s health care plan?
Speedwagon82 on April 22, 2010 at 5:55 PM
Ellie’s Rations
macncheez on April 22, 2010 at 5:55 PM
Remember this from Saturday Night Live:
To paraphrase:
We don’t care. We don’t have to. We’re the Government.
Chip on April 22, 2010 at 5:55 PM
Every time we use it, it’s like we’re thanking him or something./
ted c on April 22, 2010 at 5:58 PM
Just more of Jon Stewarts “NewSpeak”.
GarandFan on April 22, 2010 at 5:58 PM
Let’s see: It’s a National program, and it’s Socialized medicine, so why not call it:
National Socialized Healthcare?
Or
National Socialist Healthcare?
Which one sounds better?
Chip on April 22, 2010 at 5:59 PM
HAHAHAHAHA!
We ARE talking about the same White House that took credit for the Surge they opposed? Surely, you jest!
American Elephant on April 22, 2010 at 6:00 PM
A quick trip around google-town and i found all kinds of HillaryCare references (msnbc included) and a plethora of Obamacare’s (Huffington Post included).
Once again – what’s good for the goose, is racist for the gander.
sarainitaly on April 22, 2010 at 6:03 PM
How about CubaCare?
Dhuka on April 22, 2010 at 6:08 PM
Knock, knock. Hello. Is anyone home?
There is a Big Brother type aspect to it and very much so.
MB4 on April 22, 2010 at 6:10 PM
Round about the cauldron go
In the poisoned entrails throw
Fillet of Kevorkian snake
In the cauldron boil and bake
Eye of bribed congressman and toe of Ezekiel frog
Wool of kos ding bat and flapping tongue of Jon Stewart dog
Senator’s pork and blind-bureaucrat sting
Chris Matthews tingling leg and White House left wing
Maw of ravening tax shark
Root of Pelosi hemlock digged in the dark
Cheshire Cat on April 22, 2010 at 6:14 PM
oh for pete’s sake..
cmsinaz on April 22, 2010 at 6:18 PM
Very soon, it will be offensive to look upon BHO, the same way that Japanese had to bow before the emperor.
madmonkphotog on April 22, 2010 at 6:18 PM
Once you Americans get a full taste of this ObamaCare you will all be coming over to Mother Russia to get PootyCare instead.
PootyPoot on April 22, 2010 at 6:19 PM
so, revise history and think it’ll make it all better now, huh…. how orwellian.
Freedom is Slavery
Ignorance is Strength
ted c on April 22, 2010 at 6:19 PM
Someone has gotten Obama-care hung around their neck. Not sure who, but they apparently don’t like it.
tarpon on April 22, 2010 at 6:20 PM
I sure hope that Blatantblue does not misread that as BootyCare.
MB4 on April 22, 2010 at 6:21 PM
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »