Senate subpoenas Obama WH over Fort Hood shootings

posted at 9:30 am on April 20, 2010 by Ed Morrissey

Over five months have passed since Army Major Nidal Hasan massacred fourteen people at Fort Hood, and Congress has lost patience with President Obama.  The Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee has gotten few answers from the Pentagon and the Obama administration about how Hasan was allowed to remain in a position to commit that murder spree despite multiple requests.  In a rare show of bipartisanship, Senators Joe Lieberman and Susan Collins issued subpoenas to force the White House and the DoD to start providing answers:

Sens. Joseph I. Lieberman (I-Conn.) and Susan Collins (R-Maine) issued the first congressional subpoenas of the Obama administration Monday after accusing the White House of stonewalling their requests for information about the Fort Hood shootings.

In a letter with the subpoenas, the chairman and ranking member of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee said the FBI and Defense Department had ignored their requests for five months. The Nov. 5 shootings at the Texas base, the largest Army post in the United States, left 13 people dead.

Lieberman and Collins said they sought witnesses and documents about what the government previously knew about the alleged gunman, Army psychiatrist Nidal M. Hasan, and whether it had adequately investigated his pre-shooting communications with Yemeni cleric and suspected terrorist Anwar al-Aulaqi.

The White House has pushed off the requests, saying that testimony will interfere with Hasan’s prosecution and the internal disciplinary actions resulting from the incident.  That may have made sense in the first few weeks, but it’s now over five months since the shootings.  The foundation for Hasan’s prosecution should be fairly well established by now; it’s not exactly a whodunit anyway.  And if the DoD hasn’t gotten around to its internal discipline over the failure to recognize the danger Hasan presented, maybe Congress needs to know about that, too.

Previously, the FBI and the DoD have appeared in camera with select members of the committee, but that doesn’t allow the committee to address the problems openly.  That approach works on an ad hoc, informal basis, but these agencies have to have public accountability to Congress.  The White House has dragged its heels on that accountability, and it’s about time Congress demanded it.  More lives could be at stake, and we need to solve the defects in the system that allowed Hasan to remain in position despite the knowledge that he was communicating with a known AQ recruiter and had a track record of Islamist statements.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

The Nov. 5 shootings at the Texas base, the largest Army post in the United States, left 13 people dead.

Um, fourteen. One victim was an unborn child.

Akzed on April 20, 2010 at 9:34 AM

’bout time.

Cinday Blackburn on April 20, 2010 at 9:34 AM

What is all the fuss about?
Newsweek settled the issue: Hasan was the victim of Bush’s overstretched military. Case closed.

mjbrooks3 on April 20, 2010 at 9:34 AM

I don’t see what the big deal is regarding this information concerning Hasan’s prosecution. What ever the Army knew, or didn’t know, or do, prior to the shootings is of no relevance to the prosecution with the one possible instance of some sort of mitigating factor for his sentence. In other words, was he crazy and did he snap because the Army would not let him stay un-deployed?

I don’t think that will aid in the ultimate finding of whether he was guilty or not of the shootings itself.

skatz51 on April 20, 2010 at 9:36 AM

Isn’t the Nidal Hasan massacre a direct result of left wing hate against American soldiers?

the_nile on April 20, 2010 at 9:38 AM

The Tea Party members are more of a threat than murderous jihadists according to the Dems.

Apparently Lieberman didn’t get the memo.

Cody1991 on April 20, 2010 at 9:38 AM

Why would ogabe persecute a mohademian?

Inanemergencydial on April 20, 2010 at 9:38 AM

Sorry — it\’s the liberal in me. … \”since Army Major Nidal Hasan ALLEGEDLY massacred fourteen people at Fort Hood, Since Hasan.\” Innocent until proven guilty and all that…

lizzieillinois on April 20, 2010 at 9:40 AM

It was Pre-Traumatic Stress Syndrome, a malady discovered in November of 2009.

Akzed on April 20, 2010 at 9:40 AM

The White House already told us everything we will ever need to know about this right up front: The shooting was a totally random incident with absolutely no ties to Islam or terrorism, and there was no way to guess this was going to happen, let alone try to prevent it.

Case closed.

logis on April 20, 2010 at 9:44 AM

Good luck with that. obowma (D) isn’t going to release anything he doesn’t want to. And unless we vote people into Congress who will stand up to this coward, he never will.

SuperManGreenLantern on April 20, 2010 at 9:44 AM

Um, fourteen. One victim was an unborn childmass of fetal tissue, cells, blob.

Akzed on April 20, 2010 at 9:34 AM

FIFY
/libtard

bikermailman on April 20, 2010 at 9:44 AM

Bizzarro world. the Clinton regime was the most ethical and now we have the Dear Leaders regime as the most transparent.

Grayzel on April 20, 2010 at 9:47 AM

I’m waiting to see if this White House tries to cobble together an executive privilege claim to avoid turning over any documents, and if they do it, how little the big media outlets are going to care.

jon1979 on April 20, 2010 at 9:48 AM

Any trolls around?

/crickets…

Akzed on April 20, 2010 at 9:49 AM

What is all the fuss about?
Newsweek settled the issue: Hasan was the victim of Bush’s overstretched military. Case closed.

mjbrooks3 on April 20, 2010 at 9:34 AM
What would we do without Newsweek and Time?

mobydutch on April 20, 2010 at 9:49 AM

Any trolls around?

/crickets…

Akzed on April 20, 2010 at 9:49 AM

Still in bed…

bikermailman on April 20, 2010 at 9:51 AM

Obama and his minions have tried their best to ignore this. It does not fit their world view. Didn’t you know? Tea Partiers are violent. Islam is the religion of peace. /sarc

kingsjester on April 20, 2010 at 9:51 AM

Respect for Lieberman! Recently, he also critisized the government’s (self-)censorship on Islamic terrorism. He called is “Orwellian”.

Sir Galahad the Pure on April 20, 2010 at 9:54 AM

But Obama promised transparency!!!!!

/sarc

search4truth on April 20, 2010 at 9:56 AM

He is not an American, no matter where he was born.

Johnnyreb on April 20, 2010 at 8:11 AM
Found this on another thread, and it is the truth.

mobydutch on April 20, 2010 at 9:57 AM

The Fort Hood massacure is the result of the Obama, Holder philosophy and their insistance that any investigations of Hasan and his American born overseas mentor be dropped when they took over.

The stonewalling is due to the fact that an honest assessment of the facts will lead right to Holder and Obama.
AJ has done some heavy lifting and lots of posts on this mess.

http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/13245

We are very, very vulnerable due to the morons in charge!

dhunter on April 20, 2010 at 9:57 AM

We..We, need to just get on with the work of the American people.

tomas on April 20, 2010 at 9:58 AM

By the way: here’s a great video about the ridiculous (self-)censorship on Islamic terrorism by Obama and his henchmen: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=34w_JsCqjuQ

Sir Galahad the Pure on April 20, 2010 at 9:59 AM

By the way: here’s a great video about the ridiculous (self-)censorship on Islamic terrorism by Obama and his henchmen: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=34w_JsCqjuQ

Sir Galahad the Pure on April 20, 2010 at 9:59 AM
Thanks.

mobydutch on April 20, 2010 at 10:02 AM

What would we do without Newsweek and Time?

mobydutch on April 20, 2010 at 9:49 AM

A lot better.

either orr on April 20, 2010 at 10:03 AM

Harry to strip him of his committee chairmanship for going off the reservation.

chemman on April 20, 2010 at 10:04 AM

Democrats, eyes wide shut, ears covered, absolutely silent; didn’t see anything, didn’t hear anything, doesn’t know anything.

Doesn’t believe it happened but if it did, BOOOOSH.

Skandia Recluse on April 20, 2010 at 10:04 AM

I’m torn. Yes, I’d love to see the Obama Administration’s (and the military’s) deadly PC attitude put on display for all to see. However, I would recommend some caution with respect to publicizing military matters, generally speaking.

Sure, this could perhaps fall into the category of non-sensitive information, but the public has a difficult time distinguishing between sensitive and non-sensitive. I mean, the NYT has been dang near treasonous in its willingness to broadcast national security measures, etc.

The hypocrisy will not be lost on me, of course, insofar as this administration’s invocation of executive privilege takes some real cajones following eight years of Bush-bashing from the Left. But as with Obama’s other about-faces on military & foreign policy, perhaps some recognition of executive privilege should be welcomed by the Right. Whether this particular case falls under that protection is a much closer question, it seems.

And heaven forbid diversity become a casualty here. (Hah!)

cackcon on April 20, 2010 at 10:04 AM

Any trolls around?

/crickets…

Akzed on April 20, 2010 at 9:49 AM

They are still trying to find that glorious federal regulation website.

PrettyD_Vicious on April 20, 2010 at 10:05 AM

Congress has lost patience with President Obama.

Welcome to our world, Senators.

lonesome_pine on April 20, 2010 at 10:06 AM

The White House has pushed off the requests, saying that testimony will interfere with Hasan’s prosecution and the internal disciplinary actions resulting from the incident. That may have made sense in the first few weeks, but it’s now over five months since the shootings.

LOL, they are just getting started!

Remember, this “White House” is crawling with former Clinton worms, who know full well how to stall and delay investigations. And Holder is their leader.

Mission Accomplished.

Del Dolemonte on April 20, 2010 at 10:06 AM

was he crazy and did he snap because the Army would not let him stay un-deployed?
I don’t think that will aid in the ultimate finding of whether he was guilty or not of the shootings itself.
skatz51 on April 20, 2010 at 9:36 AM

No he wasn’t crazy and he didn’t snap he did an act of treason and joined the enemy, the terrorists and committed an act of terror. He was perfectly sane and in control of his actions. It was premeditated and in consultation with the enemy.
The government will remove any reference to Islamic religious belief and needs time to cover it up and claim it was a snap and crazy action, unconnected with the war on terror. they also need to get all on same page not admit any Political Correctness was to blame. Those not following the script need to take the fall and be disciplined.

Ed Laskie on April 20, 2010 at 10:09 AM

But Obama promised transparency!!!!!

/sarc

search4truth on April 20, 2010 at 9:56 AM
————-
Well I give him a solid B+

fossten on April 20, 2010 at 10:09 AM

However, I would recommend some caution with respect to publicizing military matters, generally speaking.

cackcon on April 20, 2010 at 10:04 AM

Agree with you to a point, but the mass media had an absolute feeding frenzy when the abu Ghraib thing broke. They could have “toned down their coverage” of that scandal, but instead went full speed ahead in a brazen effort to damage the Bush Administration. Which they did, successfully driving his job approval numbers down.

This of course inflamed anti-American sentiment in Iraq and no doubt led to the deaths on many US soldiers.

Del Dolemonte on April 20, 2010 at 10:10 AM

Any trolls around?

/crickets…

Akzed on April 20, 2010 at 9:49 AM
Still in bed…

bikermailman on April 20, 2010 at 9:51 AM

In line for Obama money

PatriotRider on April 20, 2010 at 10:10 AM

Damnit, there you go throwing a spanner into the ol’ reliable “right wing hate and racism” narrative.

rickyricardo on April 20, 2010 at 10:11 AM

Reason #1,000,000 no conservative or “moderate” should vote for a Democrat ever again.

BuckeyeSam on April 20, 2010 at 10:21 AM

The White House has dragged its heels on that accountability

not a part of dear leader’s vocabulary, it’s everybody else’s responsibility, he’s just there to make a nice speech every once in awhile

cmsinaz on April 20, 2010 at 10:32 AM

The White House has dragged its heels on that accountability

When has the White House been ‘accountable’ for anything? After all, doesn’t everything of late happen UNEXPECTEDLY?

GarandFan on April 20, 2010 at 10:37 AM

In a rare show of bipartisanship, Senators Joe Lieberman and Susan Collins

Uh, Ed, bipartisanship? Lieberman and Collins?

Amendment X on April 20, 2010 at 10:42 AM

the system that allowed Hasan to remain in position despite the knowledge that he was communicating with a known AQ recruiter and had a track record of Islamist statements

…is treasonous and those who let this happen need to be held accountable. Heads need to roll. I’m glad Lieberman and Snow took this bold and courageous step, but what took them so long?

scalleywag on April 20, 2010 at 10:42 AM

Hey Joe, why do you have your knickers all in a twist.
Hasan… That’s Irish isn’t it????

phreshone on April 20, 2010 at 10:44 AM

Does anyone else think that this stonewalling has something to do with the FACT that Hasan was on Obummer’s Transition team???

concernedsenior on April 20, 2010 at 10:57 AM

By the way: here’s a great video about the ridiculous (self-)censorship on Islamic terrorism by Obama and his henchmen: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=34w_JsCqjuQ

Sir Galahad the Pure on April 20, 2010 at 9:59 AM

Tapping into my keen insight into the obvious I was getting ready to post some stuff about a very dangerous strain of hyper-PC being the root cause of all this chickensh!t spin and censorship, but your link says it all.

Thanks!

More lives could be at stake, and we need to solve the defects in the system that allowed Hasan to remain in position despite the knowledge that he was communicating with a known AQ recruiter and had a track record of Islamist statements.

Ed, do you really think it’s possible to solve the defect of this dangerous PC infecting our military and National Security Strategy?

Gang-of-One on April 20, 2010 at 11:09 AM

the system that allowed to remain in position despite the knowledge that he was communicating with a known AQ recruiter and had a track record of Islamist statements
…is treasonous and those who let this happen need to be held accountable. Heads need to roll. I’m glad Lieberman and Snow took this bold and courageous step, but what took them so long?
scalleywag on April 20, 2010 at 10:42 AM

I’m sorry but treason is very special in United States Constitution and first for history to put such a high standard to it. But Hasan is guilty of it. It was in time of war, at least two witness, acted on the part of, and in full consultation with the enemy in a direct action against his fellow solders and country. This meets the standards of treason. Inaction or even just talk of sedition is not treason in US Constitution.

Ed Laskie on April 20, 2010 at 11:16 AM

Lieberman will drop them when he gets whatever it is he’s really after.

drjohn on April 20, 2010 at 11:24 AM

With regard to Hasan and the Fort Hood shootings, the pentagon screwed the pooch on their diversity b.s. and hence the coverup. If they had been doing their job correctly, Hasan would have been axed (and/or committed) and the Fort Hood shooting would have never happened.

docdave on April 20, 2010 at 11:30 AM

In a rare show of bipartisanship, Senators Joe Lieberman and Susan Collins issued subpoenas to force the White House…

Nope, even with that in bold I still don’t see the sarcasm.

I really hope Ed was trying to be sarcastic because I’d hate to think he really thinks what he wrote there.

Jaynie59 on April 20, 2010 at 11:36 AM

Authorities Defend New “Paint By Numbers” Approach to Terrorism Investigations As “So Much More Fun” Than the Old “Connect the Dots” Method http://optoons.blogspot.com/2009/11/authorities-defend-new-paint-by-numbers.html

Mervis Winter on April 20, 2010 at 11:37 AM

“Diversity” policy was always going to come to this: Congress inquiring into executive decisions that were made — with diversity policy in mind — by nameless functionaries in the course of their duties.

It’s an excellent question what would have happened with Hasan in the absence of bend-over-backward policy on “diversity.” (This word is always such a scream when it comes to the armed forces. Without any conscious effort, they are the most naturally diverse of organizations.) We don’t know for a fact that Hasan’s seniors would have handled him more alertly and with better judgment.

But without policy in place to prejudice their thinking in favor of a falsely-defined “tolerance,” they at least wouldn’t have had the threatened consequences of that policy as the tie-breaker.

Certainly it would have been better for Hasan to be processed out of the Army years ago. But if the cost of that had been a CAIR-funded lawsuit, a Congressional inquiry into the putative prejudice of Hasan’s seniors, loss of career and/or retirement rank for some of them, and the travesty of very possibly having to defend themselves in civil suits, then the question is where we get off asking those in uniform to take that one for the team.

J.E. Dyer on April 20, 2010 at 12:00 PM

Certainly it would have been better for Hasan to be processed out of the Army years ago. But if the cost of that had been a CAIR-funded lawsuit, a Congressional inquiry into the putative prejudice of Hasan’s seniors, loss of career and/or retirement rank for some of them, and the travesty of very possibly having to defend themselves in civil suits, then the question is where we get off asking those in uniform to take that one for the team.

J.E. Dyer on April 20, 2010 at 12:00 PM

And the alternate was the death of 14 soldiers? Not much of a trade-off.

docdave on April 20, 2010 at 12:06 PM

Bipartisan-Mania! The Liberal Independents and the Liberal Republicans unite to demand answers from the Liberal Democrats!

Jaibones on April 20, 2010 at 12:29 PM

And the alternate was the death of 14 soldiers? Not much of a trade-off.

docdave on April 20, 2010 at 12:06 PM

No, the alternative is not having law that effectively assumes every adverse personnel action is motivated by prejudice unless proven otherwise.

We have a choice other than (a) putting administrators under the perpetual threat of having their lives ruined by a personnel decision and (b) accepting the deaths of soldiers as the price of privileging “diversity” over administrative discretion.

Your comment implies those are our only choices.

J.E. Dyer on April 20, 2010 at 12:39 PM

Your comment implies those are our only choices.

J.E. Dyer on April 20, 2010 at 12:39 PM

In a sense they are. If the protection of your people from terrorist action is not the top priority, than you have to be guilty of some serious rationalization. That doesn’t mean that you have to be looking over the shoulder of everyone but it does involve some commonsense. To me thereccan be no justification for not raising the flag on someone, Hasan, who was broadcasting his aberrations. Additionally, one could reasonably question the Fort Hood security that permitted someone who had no official position in the review to carry weapons into the base. What I see is not failure in one direction but total failure in many directions.

docdave on April 20, 2010 at 12:59 PM

I have no idea how this is ‘bipartisan’.

Clearly, the Democrats that run this committee are NOT involved with determining the truth. Calling it bipartisan is wishfull thinking.

Freddy on April 20, 2010 at 1:12 PM

The Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee has gotten few answers from the Pentagon and the Obama administration about how Hasan was allowed to remain in a position to commit that murder spree despite multiple requests.

Ugh. That construction makes it sound like Hasan was in a position to “commit that murder spree despite multiple requests.”

VekTor on April 20, 2010 at 3:40 PM

Collins is really doing her due diligence for the GOP this week.

Sultry Beauty on April 20, 2010 at 4:42 PM

For Hussein, stonewalling on Hasan is a feature not a bug.

AnotherOpinion on April 20, 2010 at 4:53 PM

Interchangeable: ALLEGED and UNEXPECTEDLY.

leftnomore on April 20, 2010 at 10:24 PM