First, they came for the Hummers …
posted at 2:20 pm on April 19, 2010 by Ed Morrissey
Penn Jillette mourns the loss of the Hummer, which will likely disappear after May 1st, when GM’s deadline for a bid on the production unit expires without any interest. It’s not the Hummer that Jillette will miss, though; he’s no fan of muscle cars, or cars in general, as he explained in the Wall Street Journal this weekend. Jillette will mourn the end of the idea that stupidity can be addressed by rational people in rational markets, rather than government making choices about winners and losers — and warns that stupidity and freedom exist in direct proportion to each other:
Hummers are stupid and wasteful and if they go away because no one wants to buy one, that’ll be just a little sad. It’s always a little sad to lose some stupid. I love people doing stupid things that I’d never do—different stupid things than all the stupid things I do. It reminds me that although all over the world we humans have so much in common, so much love, and need, and desire, and compassion and loneliness, some of us still want to do things that the rest of us think are bug-nutty. Some of us want to drive a Hummer, some of us want to eat sheep’s heart, liver and lungs simmered in an animal’s stomach for three hours, some us want to play poker with professionals and some of us want a Broadway musical based on the music of ABBA. I love people doing things I can’t understand. It’s heartbreaking to me when people stop doing things that I can’t see any reason for them to be doing in the first place. I like people watching curling while eating pork rinds.
But if any part of the Hummer going belly-up are those government rules we’re putting in on miles per gallon, or us taking over of GM, then I’m not just sad, I’m also angry. Lack of freedom can be measured directly by lack of stupid. Freedom means freedom to be stupid. We never need freedom to do the smart thing. You don’t need any freedom to go with majority opinion. There was no freedom required to drive a Prius before the recall. We don’t need freedom to recycle, reuse and reduce. We don’t need freedom to listen to classic rock, classic classical, classic anything or Terry Gross. We exercise our freedom to its fullest when we are at our stupidest.
There’s a lot of bad stupid around. Really bad stupid. But we can’t stop the real horror by stopping just-plain-stupid stupid. We’re not going to stop overseas wars by stopping people from driving big stupid cars. As long as we think that “nation building” is part of our destiny, no amount of independence from foreign oil is going to stop us from getting into meddling, expensive, immoral foreign wars. As long as we let terrorism fill us with terror, we’re not going to get our nonstupid freedoms back. Our government declaring that we need alternative energy sources, and betting our money on who might get a smart idea, is not going to give smart people smart ideas. It’s really easy to see stupid all around us, but I don’t think we want to be too quick to stop it. We need to protect other people’s stupid to save freedom for all of us.
I’ve never been terribly impressed with the Hummer either, but that doesn’t mean I think they should be outlawed — or more accurately, regulated into obsolescence. Consumers can choose cars that make sense for themselves. When the price of gas rose rapidly in 2007-8, consumers stopped buying gas guzzlers and bought cars with better fuel efficiency. Now that the economy has taken a nose dive, consumers have begun bargain shopping, too, both of which are rational reactions to market conditions.
Why can’t Washington simply allow the rational market determine the best choices for consumers? For one thing, it would mean that politicians would have a lot less to do, which would also mean special-interest groups would have a lot fewer reasons to donate cash. Politicians also feel the need to justify their existence by pointing to new ways in which they save Americans, mainly from themselves. Both impulses have a lot to do with why nanny-statism has been mainstreamed in American political thought over the last several decades.
Jillette’s right. We could think about stupidity being the canary in the coal mine. The only way to regulate against stupid choices is to take choice from people. Where stupidity gets regulated out of existence — or at least the elite’s idea about stupidity — then we will watch freedom disappear as well.
Addendum: Like many Hot Air readers, I am a big fan of Penn & Teller’s BS on Showtime. I don’t always agree, especially on matters of faith, but they do a great job in skewering the ridiculous and the oppressive and forcing their viewers to at least think about alternative viewpoints and approaches. In its understated way, this may have been the best article I’ve read from Jillette.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »
Common sense is all too rare these days.
Bob's Kid on April 19, 2010 at 2:25 PM
HaHHHAAAHHahahahah! You’re a funny guy, Ed.
Bugler on April 19, 2010 at 2:25 PM
I thought we did this one yesterday.
cozmo on April 19, 2010 at 2:26 PM
Old definition:
http://www.quotationspage.com/quote/117.html
Puritanism: The haunting fear that someone, somewhere, may be happy.
H. L. Mencken
US editor (1880 – 1956)
New definition:
Liberalism: The haunting fear that someone, somewhere, may be happy.
rbj on April 19, 2010 at 2:26 PM
A Hummer on a flat suburban street is a cringe inducing moment.
Always has been, always will be.
rickyricardo on April 19, 2010 at 2:26 PM
I’m not a particular fan of Jillette myself. As to his stupid choices equals freedom rant, there are much better ways of making the argument for freedom. (shrug) Different strokes and all that.
Guardian on April 19, 2010 at 2:27 PM
So I can safely assume that Penn Jillette will NOT be entering the EPA commercial contest.
WashJeff on April 19, 2010 at 2:27 PM
Jillette= Allahpundit?
Kristamatic on April 19, 2010 at 2:28 PM
Humvees are cool.
Hummers are not.
Government regulation stifling domestic industry is not.
Centralizing business is not.
Voting everyone out of office that facilitates the last two is.
MadisonConservative on April 19, 2010 at 2:29 PM
But the really stupid people won’t understand what is happening to them…but sometimes stupid isn’t stupid.
Sometimes intelligent people just can’t conceive that others are doing stupid things….like the old but true analysis with the holocaust, intelligent people just can’t conceive “bold” moves. Which is the premise of the “big lie”…like Obamacare will not raise taxes, or cause a monetary burden, in fact it will alleviate them.
Politicians rely, they live, on stupid people.
right2bright on April 19, 2010 at 2:29 PM
..the only joy in this is that — eventually — they will come for those stupid-assed Smart cars. I can’t stand those things..they somehow remind me of all the cutesy-pie, ultra-hip younger generation who voted Obama in.
I guess I am just a grumpy, seedy old guy.
VoyskaPVO on April 19, 2010 at 2:29 PM
I like a Big vehicle for pulling trailers and boats – to me that’s not stupid – Recreation is a great for family fun ). I see it as limiting Mobility and Freedom .
wheels on April 19, 2010 at 2:30 PM
I like Penn too, but when he makes statements like this
you can see the influence the Ron Paul style of thinking has on him.
The phrase immoral wars ought to be banned.
Just A Grunt on April 19, 2010 at 2:30 PM
Naw, Penn always tells you exactly what he thinks, while Allah just shovels chum into the water and tries to look innocent when a fight breaks out.
fiatboomer on April 19, 2010 at 2:31 PM
I always have wondered what the last thoughts of a “Smart” car driver were as they watched the semi with all wheels locked and smoking filling their rearview mirror while they sit at a traffic light.
Guardian on April 19, 2010 at 2:32 PM
until you’re fighting 4 feet of snow during the winter
Doctor Zhivago on April 19, 2010 at 2:34 PM
I thought people stopped buying Hummers when people started to realize that driving around in a Hummer made you look like a bit of a d’bag.
YYZ on April 19, 2010 at 2:35 PM
Jillette is right.
Dennis Leary also summed it up correctly in his song “I’m an a**hole”.
portlandon on April 19, 2010 at 2:35 PM
So when does Horatio Cain on CSI-Miami start driving a Prius?
SlaveDog on April 19, 2010 at 2:37 PM
Criticize the auto bailout all you want, but didn’t the market decide that we didn’t want Hummer’s anymore?
As long as Suburbans are still permitted, I don’t think we can blame the government for the demise of the Hummer.
YYZ on April 19, 2010 at 2:38 PM
YYYEAAAAHH!
lorien1973 on April 19, 2010 at 2:38 PM
Sounds like something Hitler or Stalin would say.
MB4 on April 19, 2010 at 2:39 PM
SlaveDog on April 19, 2010 at 2:37 PM
He needs it to hold his ego – will never fit into a Prius.
dpierson on April 19, 2010 at 2:39 PM
No, they won’t. Their goal is to force us all to drive
SmartDumb cars.Gregor on April 19, 2010 at 2:40 PM
Jillette is OK but he goes too far out of his way to kiss ass to the politically correct crowd that his world is full of. He has to say that Hummers are stupid 20 times just to make sure people know he is personally opposed to them.
echosyst on April 19, 2010 at 2:41 PM
Not really. But sort of. Hummers have been on the decline (due to gas prices, and the newer models sucking) but post bailout, Government Motors decided to dump them and wanted to sell it off. No buyers, so it will be disappearing.
lorien1973 on April 19, 2010 at 2:41 PM
I heard that Masa likes Hummers.
donkichi on April 19, 2010 at 2:42 PM
Ouch!
Gregor on April 19, 2010 at 2:43 PM
Also, Dennis Leary in “Demolition Man”
That whole city is kinda creepy. But, I gather, too many people would be happy to live in that city.
lorien1973 on April 19, 2010 at 2:44 PM
Hummer is gone because they couldn’t sell enough of them. It was the market that decided that. The price of gas tanked their sales. There are no shortage of gas guzzlers to buy if you want sports cars or big sedans. Penn is way off the mark here.
keep the change on April 19, 2010 at 2:45 PM
I don’t know about that…look at the level of stupidity in America.
Dark-Star on April 19, 2010 at 2:45 PM
Actually there is nothing intelligent about the Stratocaster,
The American invented and produced guitar that rules the World
and Rock n Roll
This is why we need a free market
Man does not live by bread alone.
Observation on April 19, 2010 at 2:45 PM
I reject his argument. Stupid is what has allowed our government policies to get to where they’re at right now. Reminds me of the old saying about keeping an open mind, but not so open that your brains fall out.
Equating stupid with freedom is the most ridiculous thing I’ve ever read. It creates a self-fulfilling prophecy.
His stab at American exceptionalism shows his stupid (and naive) way of thinking about freedoms. The fact that many nations won’t allow their people to be stupid (free) means there will always be the need for a leader among free nations that those people can turn to when democracy inevitably breaks out in their nation. Who will support their right to be stupid? Who will issue guidance to them as they learn to be stupid?
Penn wants to save freedoms for those who think like him and agree with him. The contradictions in his argument are astounding.
ButterflyDragon on April 19, 2010 at 2:46 PM
Okay, but if there hadn’t been a bailout, there might not be a GM. Either way, Hummer was in trouble.
YYZ on April 19, 2010 at 2:47 PM
The worst part of Hummer was the sale. No one wanted to buy the name or plants because they would have to deal with GM. You would have to be crazy to deal with GM. I suspect the chicago way would be for GM to have the buyer eat the warranty claims. Most of those claims were erased by bankruptcy.
seven on April 19, 2010 at 2:47 PM
The BS show on organic food was the best.
faol on April 19, 2010 at 2:48 PM
The opposite, actually. People need to be free to do what anyone else thinks is stupid.
exception on April 19, 2010 at 2:49 PM
Myth. Someone would have taken control of GM. Yeah hummer may have been gone, either way. But still, the process by which it happens matters.
lorien1973 on April 19, 2010 at 2:50 PM
Even the Chinese who were willing to buy the brand gave up after learning they would have to deal with government motors.
Johnnyreb on April 19, 2010 at 2:50 PM
I enjoy being stuck next to an H2 in my dirt covered 77 CJ5 when I come back into town from a weekend of expanding my carbon footprint. The ending to the movie Cars has it just about right.
Fighton03 on April 19, 2010 at 2:51 PM
He likes me! He really, really likes me!
TugboatPhil on April 19, 2010 at 2:51 PM
We are told we have to wear seat belts for safety. But we are also told riding in a really big truck is a no-no. Instead we are encouraged to drive an econobox death trap like a Honda Civic.
angryed on April 19, 2010 at 2:53 PM
Lucy is calling your name.
And it is obvious that you have never been in a snow storm.. hummer or not. Cringe dear fellow.. I am going to ride your behind! I am a woman driver… hear my engine rawr!
upinak on April 19, 2010 at 2:53 PM
Ain’t that the truth.
portlandon on April 19, 2010 at 2:54 PM
I’m not into that sort of thing, but I’d make an exception for ya. :P
lorien1973 on April 19, 2010 at 2:54 PM
Oh geez.. is this a Jeep (Just Empty Every Pocket) / every other truck episode?
How about Ricky likes them hybrids and we like Big trucks with big tires!
upinak on April 19, 2010 at 2:54 PM
Pull my hair!
upinak on April 19, 2010 at 2:55 PM
still like seeing my neighbor trying to drive his smart car in the middle of winter. It’s one of the dumbest things you will ever see
Doctor Zhivago on April 19, 2010 at 2:55 PM
Because to be a progressive means wanting to control every aspect of everyone ELSE’S lives.
Daggett on April 19, 2010 at 2:56 PM
LOL, yep, I see it all the time up here. I am buying another truck… another ranger. So I will have 5 trucks, in which all have 4 wheel drive, and all can at least get thru 4 inches of snow on the ground.
upinak on April 19, 2010 at 2:57 PM
I see this attitude in a lot of people I know. They see someone driving a Hummer, and start going on about how awful Hummers are, etc, etc. My answer to that kind of comment is:
“Well, it’s a free country. If they can afford one, they ought to be able to buy one.”
They ought not to be bailed out if they can’t afford the payments, insurance, or gas for it, however. Stupid must have consequences.
BobOfTexas on April 19, 2010 at 2:58 PM
I’d love to see the list of people, including whole families, that by riding in a Hummer had their lives saved in what normally would’ve been a fatal accident. I imagine it’s a very long list. In high-speed accidents, it’s good to be the heavy one.
RBMN on April 19, 2010 at 2:58 PM
My Truck is smaller than yours! lol
Actually, no its a comment on people who buy SUV/off road looking vehicles and never use them for more than getting groceries.
Fighton03 on April 19, 2010 at 3:00 PM
Pretty profound.
Basically a concentration of power and freedom to the government is the concentration of stupid. We aren’t allowed to be stupid, that’s the governments job.
This also explains why the arts/sciences always deteriorate with command economies. No freedom to be stupid.
Russia had a great culture…after 70 years even the Kirov was bad.
r keller on April 19, 2010 at 3:03 PM
I will give you that one. But I have trucks that are more for the crappy roads and snow more then to go offroad. I have ATV’s for that kind of stuff. The roads up here are .. well fun. Imagine roads, during spring… with HUGE humps in them. I don’t need to go off roading.. I just need to drive on the roads.
upinak on April 19, 2010 at 3:04 PM
But…but…I thought the left LOVES hummers.
Oh, NEVERMIND!
Laura in Maryland on April 19, 2010 at 3:06 PM
I fear winter ‘roads’ in AK (though it takes a 4WD to use some of the roads in LA now thanks to how sacramento raids the DMV funds).
Fighton03 on April 19, 2010 at 3:09 PM
Good catch and upgrade!
ya2daup on April 19, 2010 at 3:10 PM
William Jefferson Clinton mourns their passing (or perhaps the increased degree of difficulty to obtain one).
ya2daup on April 19, 2010 at 3:11 PM
Ed’s post doesn’t even attempt to address the main argument for regulating hummers – negative externalities. Regulating inefficient vehicles isn’t about saving people from their own stupidity. Sure, the purchasers of hummers impose unnecessary costs upon themselves, but I agree with Ed and Jilette that this in itself is no cause for governmental intervention.
The problem is that these purchasers also impose unnecessary costs on other people, people who were not involved in the transaction at all. Whether or not you think climate change is a hoax, you cannot deny that hummers are a net ecological minus. But the market left to itself will not factor ecological costs into the price of a hummer, because the overwhelming proportion of these costs are neither to the seller nor to the buyer.
Regulation isn’t always about nanny-statism, and this is a case where it isn’t. Like it or not, there are genuine market failures. Now you might be a principled libertarian and argue that the government shouldn’t intervene to correct market failures. That’s an argument we can have, but neither Ed nor Jillette acknowledges the existence of these externalities, preferring a straw man about protecting people from their own stupidity.
Jazzman on April 19, 2010 at 3:12 PM
LOL…when 80K lbs of big rig is filling your rearview, anything short of an M$ sherman isn’t enough.
Fighton03 on April 19, 2010 at 3:17 PM
grr..that’s M4….
Fighton03 on April 19, 2010 at 3:17 PM
Ummm… you just gave yourself away. How about YOU go and tell me what car or truck I can drive and then you take your crappy little electric car and see who is the winner. Trust me…. your aluminum can is a loser.
upinak on April 19, 2010 at 3:18 PM
IMHO, Hummers are quite silly creatures, but how far away are we from loosing the workhorse large vehicles that are necessities of life in many parts of the country.
I have real concerns with the “urban mentality” that is running the show at the top regarding transportation these days. We live in isolated far West Texas, routinely haul trailers and going anywhere is a “major trip”. I can’t count the number of Smart Cars and Prius’ that I’ve watched cause near misses because they lack the power to “get out of the way”.
Our family recently walked away from a major rollover accident on a West Texas highway. The cops (who were over an hour away) and the EMT’s were stunned that the worst injury was a black eye…. All of the “official people” who responded were pretty blunt… if we had been driving anything other than our 2003 (pre-government motors) Suburban, they would have been pulling out bodies.
and don’t forget…. Gun Control is BS too!
2nd Ammendment Mother on April 19, 2010 at 3:18 PM
Glad you made it out alive. Why not tell the people in here what you were driving so they can see the difference in a larger secure vehicle, compared to that of a tin can electic wind up toy.
upinak on April 19, 2010 at 3:21 PM
Facepalm. I read it and still asked. Duh. Need more coffee.
upinak on April 19, 2010 at 3:21 PM
Or put another way….
WAHHH WAHHH WAHHH it’s not fair that some get to drive nice trucks while others have to drive a POS.
Your argument is socialism 101 and it’s pathetic.
angryed on April 19, 2010 at 3:22 PM
Doesn’t Obama’s auto entourage consist of hummers? Can we give him, and all the drivers citations? Hmmmmmmm? Or is this another example of do as they say, not as they do?
capejasmine on April 19, 2010 at 3:22 PM
Driving SUV’s in warm, flat Florida might seem a bit wasteful, but it should still be legal if drivers can find the brake pedal when needed.
Gas might get a little expensive up north, but when the next blizzard hits, the guy with a snowplow will be really popular, and probably make some of his gas money back.
It’s all about the market, or as Clinton would say, “It’s the economy, stupid”.
Steve Z on April 19, 2010 at 3:24 PM
I needed a new belt, so today I went to the local Ross, a discount clothing chain here in the Southeast. I found a nice black leather belt for $6.99. Ross has tags telling what the manufacturer’s suggested retail price is, and I was stunned to see the belt’s original MSRP at $37! Thirty-seven dollars for a belt? I don’t care if you’re a billionaire, to pay that for a belt is stupid. But I don’t want the government regulting belt prices. Not just because it’s an improper function of government, but because to do it, the feds would set up a separate “Belt Price Agency” with different subdivisions for leather and web, and the agency would have at least 20 employees making better than 70K a year.
radjah shelduck on April 19, 2010 at 3:25 PM
The “stupidest stupid” evah; Electing Barack Obama to the office of President of the United States.
Susanboo on April 19, 2010 at 3:26 PM
Yes, it is. Nanny’s provide a good service, they just shouldn’t be allowed free reign.
Fighton03 on April 19, 2010 at 3:26 PM
Wow—he really makes a great case here for stupid. As stupid as it sounds, his argument for stupid is pretty damn smart– as well as concise.
nice work dude.
ted c on April 19, 2010 at 3:26 PM
There’s hope:
Hummer Carriage
Ben Hur on April 19, 2010 at 3:27 PM
Fighton03…
Several years ago, we happened to be rear ended by a semi (see above scenario). We were driving our 1996 F150 farm truck with custom bumpers. Once the accident report was written up, we drove away….. the Semi (truck portion) was totaled. A well built vehicle can be the difference between life and death in an accident…. if that means I sacrifice gas mileage for better odds, then fill ‘er up!
2nd Ammendment Mother on April 19, 2010 at 3:27 PM
given the topic of the thread, I had to read this three times because I kept asking myself “why do you get a fan belt at Ross?” LOL.
Fighton03 on April 19, 2010 at 3:28 PM
I test drove a Hummer across Afghanistan….potholes, ridges, rivers, ditches and jenga trucks. As far as comfort, they suck. As far as protection when its loaded with 6-7 other armed Rangers, can’t beat it. I’d never buy one though.
ted c on April 19, 2010 at 3:28 PM
How come paying 300% more for groceries at Whole Foods compared to Walmart is heroic? But spending 50% more on gas driving a Hummer vs. a Honda Accord and you’re worse than Hitler.
angryed on April 19, 2010 at 3:28 PM
You think $37 is a lot for a belt?
That’s nothing.
angryed on April 19, 2010 at 3:32 PM
WOW! I have no beef with the “truck vs small car” safety argument, I’m glad you were ok. My 01 sierra got mangled by a bobtail right after I bought it, after a week in the body shop it’s still in my driveway, but I still consider it wise advice to avoid being stopped in front of a speeding freightliner :).
Fighton03 on April 19, 2010 at 3:32 PM
Military hummer (essentially H1)?
Fighton03 on April 19, 2010 at 3:33 PM
Behold the reflexive ,without batting an eyelash,attitude of a lefty.
Dr. Carlo Lombardi on April 19, 2010 at 3:34 PM
He took a lot of words to say that freedom tolerates stupid choices and government actions limit choices, stupid or otherwise.
SKYFOX on April 19, 2010 at 3:44 PM
Did you have the performance or comfort package?
SKYFOX on April 19, 2010 at 3:46 PM
You cannot regulate everything to form perfection… just the opposite, by doing so you are eliminating choice and the basis for character and reason. In an attempt to regulate away the bad, be it eating choices or mandatory health care coverage, individuals have choices removed from them and cannot be said to have this character trait known as ‘virtue’. Freedom from decisions is a definition of enslavement, not of expanded freedom.
In an attempt to regulate away choices we are left less able to understand life and less able to deal with hard choices when they do arise. The concept of ‘death panels’ isn’t a horror because of someone else making a decision on your life, it is a horror when you accept someone has the authority to do so. We purposely keep government’s ability to decide life and death at the far extremes of law because it is such a momentous thing to do that it must have checks and balances against its abuse… and courts and juries still get it wrong, which is part of the sacrifice we make for having the law. When that decision is pushed down to bureaucrats, your life is no longer one of your decision: you live because you are allowed to be born, you go through your life making no decisions as you accept you are told what to do, and you die with the stroke of a bureaucrat’s pen saying that you just don’t have enough good years left to live and the money is better spent elsewhere. That is the reductio ad absurdum of regulating everything: you are killed not by a war or famine, but by a bureaucrat deciding you are not worthy of keeping around.
Currently we pay for those who can’t pay for treatment via higher costs to the entire system… and that system has built in inflators via regulations, ‘oversight’ and subsidies in the form of tax credits. The problems of subsidies are well known, causing uneconomic use of anything it is applied to. Making something mandatory and being unable to understand the economics of it results in the tragedy of the commons where no one is willing to maintain the common good because its low cost is seen as negligible per individual. Then we all pay for that loss of whatever was given out or forced upon us by its lack of presence. Thus we have the confluence of subsidies and the tragedy of the commons which, when played out, gets horrifically expensive and very hard to get items or services… and that goes not just for health care but anything that falls under both outlooks.
Those very regulations which are supposed to make everything so much better may have some beneficial effect when limited to those things purely in common: earth, air, water. When the attempt to regulate morality via behavior through regulations and laws is performed, you end up with a hellaciously expensive proposition and a corrosion of moral fiber to actually understand and make any decisions to correct the problem. Because that corrective is to repeal restrictions, and know that the lesson has been taught and the cost of enforcing it is not worth the effort in time, money and the restriction of liberty for the individual. Of course that brings back the dreaded decisions that one must make, and some people will make better ones than others… and the Left hates that and prefers that we all end equally, killed by bureaucrats.
ajacksonian on April 19, 2010 at 3:50 PM
That’s okay… someday’s are longer than others! and because we’re not subject to having our comments review… you were merely exercising your freedom to post a “stupid question”, my all time favorite freedom!
2nd Ammendment Mother on April 19, 2010 at 3:53 PM
…and here I thought Bill Clinton’s whole Presidency was defined by the Hummer…..
search4truth on April 19, 2010 at 4:00 PM
If you can make this argument about the Hummer or any car that doesn’t get the government approved MPG, can’t we make the same argument about hybrids and electric cars that get all these tax credits? Without these credits the market (ie, people making rational decisions based on what they can or want to afford) would probably buy them in the same numbers as Hummers are bought.
aLoha Tim on April 19, 2010 at 4:01 PM
To me its not the loss of the Hummer that’s so telling, its the killing of incentive to produce that’s in turn killing the country and the Hummer with it.
Speakup on April 19, 2010 at 4:03 PM
While I may agree with his overall premise about losing freedoms, this has got to be the stupidest thing I’ve ever read.
MobileVideoEngineer on April 19, 2010 at 4:06 PM
But the Smart Car will let you be buried in a shoebox. Think of the savings to your loved ones.
katy the mean old lady on April 19, 2010 at 4:08 PM
haven’t read many of Obie speeches huh?
Fighton03 on April 19, 2010 at 4:10 PM
You mean the Obama Buggy?
unclesmrgol on April 19, 2010 at 4:10 PM
Epic Stupid right here, folks. And this prissy little libtard is probably going to whine about how he’s being censored because I’m pointing that out.
Guess what, pinko rat? You don’t have a right to be surrounded by people that agree with you. Go peddle your BS someplace else.
gryphon202 on April 19, 2010 at 4:13 PM
Deomocrats refuse to drill for oil in America. Stupid.
TN Mom on April 19, 2010 at 4:15 PM
Jillette=
AllahpunditGlenn Beck?Kristamatic on April 19, 2010 at 2:28 PM
FIFY
ProudPalinFan on April 19, 2010 at 4:18 PM
I like Hummers simply because they make moonbats cringe. I drive a big (and I mean big) honkin truck, and have an LS-1 6 speed Z-28, even my kid has a jacked Mustang. We fast loud cars and trucks. It’s a guy thing.
Alden Pyle on April 19, 2010 at 4:18 PM
It’s a huge imposition on taxpayers for Obama to travel around the country aboard AF1 selling healthcare (which already passed) and his financial reform bill…
TN Mom on April 19, 2010 at 4:23 PM
You sir, are a genius. Dennis Leary was in Demolition Man, and he used to raid the Taco Bells.
Shock the Monkey on April 19, 2010 at 4:26 PM
No, don’t be…I call them clown cars (if anyone saw the exchange on Bill O’ Reilly and Laura Ingraham, she told him the priceless quote, “You don’t fit inside one of those clown cars!” The crew behind the cameras could not contain themselves laughing, nor O’).
I just fantasize about my dog driving it. She’s huge enough to take a passenger seat, tall enough sitting up and is so heavy she activates the SRS. Huge, fluffy and polar-bear lookin’ = hot chick that turns heads while being totally clueless :D .
Then I imagine my family plus dog, plus hauling wood for a long drive home=PRICELESS. Yep. Washington doing the best, stupidest things for We The People.
ProudPalinFan on April 19, 2010 at 4:27 PM
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »