First, they came for the Hummers …

posted at 2:20 pm on April 19, 2010 by Ed Morrissey

Penn Jillette mourns the loss of the Hummer, which will likely disappear after May 1st, when GM’s deadline for a bid on the production unit expires without any interest.  It’s not the Hummer that Jillette will miss, though; he’s no fan of muscle cars, or cars in general, as he explained in the Wall Street Journal this weekend.  Jillette will mourn the end of the idea that stupidity can be addressed by rational people in rational markets, rather than government making choices about winners and losers — and warns that stupidity and freedom exist in direct proportion to each other:

Hummers are stupid and wasteful and if they go away because no one wants to buy one, that’ll be just a little sad. It’s always a little sad to lose some stupid. I love people doing stupid things that I’d never do—different stupid things than all the stupid things I do. It reminds me that although all over the world we humans have so much in common, so much love, and need, and desire, and compassion and loneliness, some of us still want to do things that the rest of us think are bug-nutty. Some of us want to drive a Hummer, some of us want to eat sheep’s heart, liver and lungs simmered in an animal’s stomach for three hours, some us want to play poker with professionals and some of us want a Broadway musical based on the music of ABBA. I love people doing things I can’t understand. It’s heartbreaking to me when people stop doing things that I can’t see any reason for them to be doing in the first place. I like people watching curling while eating pork rinds.

But if any part of the Hummer going belly-up are those government rules we’re putting in on miles per gallon, or us taking over of GM, then I’m not just sad, I’m also angry. Lack of freedom can be measured directly by lack of stupid. Freedom means freedom to be stupid. We never need freedom to do the smart thing. You don’t need any freedom to go with majority opinion. There was no freedom required to drive a Prius before the recall. We don’t need freedom to recycle, reuse and reduce. We don’t need freedom to listen to classic rock, classic classical, classic anything or Terry Gross. We exercise our freedom to its fullest when we are at our stupidest.

There’s a lot of bad stupid around. Really bad stupid. But we can’t stop the real horror by stopping just-plain-stupid stupid. We’re not going to stop overseas wars by stopping people from driving big stupid cars. As long as we think that “nation building” is part of our destiny, no amount of independence from foreign oil is going to stop us from getting into meddling, expensive, immoral foreign wars. As long as we let terrorism fill us with terror, we’re not going to get our nonstupid freedoms back. Our government declaring that we need alternative energy sources, and betting our money on who might get a smart idea, is not going to give smart people smart ideas. It’s really easy to see stupid all around us, but I don’t think we want to be too quick to stop it. We need to protect other people’s stupid to save freedom for all of us.

I’ve never been terribly impressed with the Hummer either, but that doesn’t mean I think they should be outlawed — or more accurately, regulated into obsolescence. Consumers can choose cars that make sense for themselves. When the price of gas rose rapidly in 2007-8, consumers stopped buying gas guzzlers and bought cars with better fuel efficiency. Now that the economy has taken a nose dive, consumers have begun bargain shopping, too, both of which are rational reactions to market conditions.

Why can’t Washington simply allow the rational market determine the best choices for consumers? For one thing, it would mean that politicians would have a lot less to do, which would also mean special-interest groups would have a lot fewer reasons to donate cash. Politicians also feel the need to justify their existence by pointing to new ways in which they save Americans, mainly from themselves.  Both impulses have a lot to do with why nanny-statism has been mainstreamed in American political thought over the last several decades.

Jillette’s right.  We could think about stupidity being the canary in the coal mine.  The only way to regulate against stupid choices is to take choice from people.  Where stupidity gets regulated out of existence — or at least the elite’s idea about stupidity — then we will watch freedom disappear as well.

Addendum: Like many Hot Air readers, I am a big fan of Penn & Teller’s BS on Showtime.  I don’t always agree, especially on matters of faith, but they do a great job in skewering the ridiculous and the oppressive and forcing their viewers to at least think about alternative viewpoints and approaches.  In its understated way, this may have been the best article I’ve read from Jillette.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

Actually there is nothing intelligent about the Stratocaster,
The American invented and produced guitar that rules the World
and Rock n Roll

This is why we need a free market
Man does not live by bread alone.

Observation on April 19, 2010 at 2:45 PM

Duuude don’t get me started on the Gibsons & Epiphones I saw yesterday at the CMA’s. I was screaming to the TV; dammit I was gonna get me a Hummingbird! Damn!

ProudPalinFan on April 19, 2010 at 4:32 PM

Freedom means freedom to be stupid.

Yes, next when some lefty says what freedoms have you lost under Obama… I think I will use some version of that.

Without the freedom to fail, there is no reward for success. Success is not success it is charity.

petunia on April 19, 2010 at 4:34 PM

I like Hummers simply because they make moonbats cringe. I drive a big (and I mean big) honkin truck, and have an LS-1 6 speed Z-28, even my kid has a jacked Mustang. We fast loud cars and trucks. It’s a guy thing.

Alden Pyle on April 19, 2010 at 4:18 PM

You, sir, would be the ideal customer for Freightliner’s recreational vehicles. If you think a Hummer makes a lib cringe, wait until you drive by in a P2 or P4XL. They’ll drop on the ground and have seizures.

http://www.sportchassis.com/

ButterflyDragon on April 19, 2010 at 4:34 PM

Old definition:

http://www.quotationspage.com/quote/117.html

Puritanism: The haunting fear that someone, somewhere, may be happy.
H. L. Mencken
US editor (1880 – 1956)

New definition:
Liberalism: The haunting fear that someone, somewhere, may be happy.

rbj on April 19, 2010 at 2:26 PM

Socialism is a political movement built on envy. It feeds on the bases of human emotions.

petunia on April 19, 2010 at 4:36 PM

Why is a Hummer stupid and wasteful? Quite the opposite, the original Hummer, rather than the later versions is quite useful for remote locations. It has a high clearance and with a low center of gravity.

When they were first introduced a liberal friend of mine and I were having this very conversation. He was all for the Hummer and saw great use for it in the timber and mining industries. Since we were both and still both are associated with industrial dismantling and demolition industry, we could see that the cost was quite low for what it could do.

At about that moment as we were driving to Ahnold’s restaurant in Santa Monica, Shotsi (sic?) up drives Ahnold in his new Hummer.

Kermit on April 19, 2010 at 4:36 PM

So I can safely assume that Penn Jillette will NOT be entering the EPA commercial contest.

WashJeff on April 19, 2010 at 2:27 PM

That was his entry. How’d he do?

petunia on April 19, 2010 at 4:37 PM

I will give you that one. But I have trucks that are more for the crappy roads and snow more then to go offroad. I have ATV’s for that kind of stuff. The roads up here are .. well fun. Imagine roads, during spring… with HUGE humps in them. I don’t need to go off roading.. I just need to drive on the roads.

upinak on April 19, 2010 at 3:04 PM

If I wasn’t sure you were in Alaska right now, I’d swear you were writing about Puerto Rico. They have no clue how to patch a pothole. Well, there’s no specific rules for cargo trucks either.

ProudPalinFan on April 19, 2010 at 4:40 PM

You, sir, would be the ideal customer for Freightliner’s recreational vehicles. If you think a Hummer makes a lib cringe, wait until you drive by in a P2 or P4XL. They’ll drop on the ground and have seizures.

http://www.sportchassis.com/

ButterflyDragon on April 19, 2010 at 4:34 PM

As an epileptic, I thank you for this! You made me tear up a bit. I am waiting for my in-laws to get to their house to show off. THEY will want one of those! I bet the accesories cost a ton.

ProudPalinFan on April 19, 2010 at 4:51 PM

Ed is wrong.

There was an American buyer for Hummer but GM turned them down.

Linky thing.

According to Fox News, Raser, a company known for outfitting the Hummer H3 with plug-in hybrid powertrains, has voiced interest in the SUV brand. Raser Technologies unveiled a 100-mpg hybrid H3 at the SAE World Congress last year. However, GM has rejected the bid.

GM has already officially committed to shutting down the brand, following a failed bid by Tengzhong. GM also has worries about Raser’s ability to service the warranty obligations of the brand, according to The Atlantic.

Another reason, albeit a bad one, for GM not wanting to sell the brand to Raser, is the company’s ability to make hybrids. Raser’s electric Hummer H3 boasts ranges on par, or even better then the Chevrolet Volt by utilizing the same range-extending hybrid configuration.

With this current configuration, the hybrid H3 could be able to manage 360 miles and a zero-to-60 time from 9.5 seconds to just 8.8 seconds.

Hummer is being killed on purpose probably because Michelle Obama doesn’t like them.

NeoKong on April 19, 2010 at 5:38 PM

Why is a Hummer stupid but a Maybach (sp?) or a 12 cylinder mercedes or BMW isn’t?

If the Government can outlaw gas guzzling 4-wheel vehicles what will stop them from targeting motor homes, boats, and private planes? Where does it end?

mad scientist on April 19, 2010 at 6:59 PM

I like a Big vehicle for pulling trailers and boats – to me that’s not stupid – Recreation is a great for family fun ). I see it as limiting Mobility and Freedom .
wheels on April 19, 2010 at 2:30 PM

So do I, but a Hummer couldn’t pull my 10k lb boat so I bought a 2002 Chevy diesel at less cost that gets 20 mpg highway rather than 10 mpg.

Hummers look cool, but you pay for that.

elfman on April 19, 2010 at 8:02 PM

You, sir, would be the ideal customer for Freightliner’s recreational vehicles. If you think a Hummer makes a lib cringe, wait until you drive by in a P2 or P4XL. They’ll drop on the ground and have seizures.

http://www.sportchassis.com/

ButterflyDragon on April 19, 2010 at 4:34 PM

Holy Crap! Anything bigger would be a semi. Anything heaver would be an armored truck.

I know I can’t afford one, but I have the urge to get one.

I never liked the civilian hummers. I’d love to have a military Humvee, but the H2 was awful, and the H3 was worse.

I’d love a pickup truck, but I have to wait until after I get my college degree (goes to a corner and cries).

I hate grad school. I love research, but I hate grad school. I just wish I had enough money to buy my own tools so I could do my own research.

Chaz706 on April 19, 2010 at 8:56 PM

Hummer is being killed on purpose probably because Michelle Obama doesn’t like them.

NeoKong on April 19, 2010 at 5:38 PM

DAMN YOU!!! DAMN YOU ALL!!

They blew it up! They blew it all up!

Chaz706 on April 19, 2010 at 8:57 PM

Ford fans Rejoice!! You can even get them with a Caterpillar engine!

insert Tim Allen grunts “here”

Icarr0331 on April 20, 2010 at 1:12 PM

Comment pages: 1 2