Will Dems sneak a second “doctor fix” through Congress?
posted at 1:36 pm on April 1, 2010 by Ed Morrissey
Democrats deliberately used scheduled future reimbursement rate cuts for Medicare and Medicaid to score their ObamaCare bill with the CBO, even though Democrats pledged to rescind the planned 21% cut in reimbursement rates in order to secure the AMA’s endorsement for their health-care overhaul. When Rep. Paul Ryan asked the CBO to add the planned “doctor fix” that rescinded the cuts and changed the reimbursement rates on which they scored the original bill, the CBO’s socre shows that ObamaCare will expand the deficit rather than reduce it. Now Jon Ward at the Daily Caller reports that Democrats may have to sneak another “doctor fix” that will add tens of billions more to that deficit spending in ObamaCare:
The federal government already has the “Doc Fix,” an annual shortfall of about $20 billion that must be paid to maintain current payment rates to physicians under Medicare.
Now, it looks like President Obama’s health-care bill created another funding cliff, costing an additional $5.5 billion or so each year.
Critics say the costs were hidden from view in the $940 billion health-care bill to lower the price tag by about $30 billion, and also as a way to gain the support of doctors and hospitals without angering governors. …
The health bill says that the federal government will pay the extra cost of paying higher rates for Medicaid patients. But only for two years: 2013 and 2014.
The cost for those two years of federal spending is $8 billion, according to the Congressional Budget Office.
So in 2015, the federal government will either step in and pay the extra charges, as they’ve done with the Doc Fix, or they will force states to take on the extra costs.
Keith Hennessey first blew the whistle on this shell game almost two weeks ago. With an avalanche of reports of unintended (or intended) consequences landing in media reports over the past week, this is a good time to review why the ObamaCare bill has them — and why it won’t work.
First, the problem here results from a confusion of cost controls with price controls. The scheduled reimbursement cuts made the same error. Only in the most superficial manner does cutting reimbursements control costs. The prices paid by the government go down, which allows the government to claim some sort of control over costs, but that’s not what actually happens in the market. The artificially low price forces providers to reduce services or to refuse to participate in the market altogether, if they lose money while providing the service. Rather than make medical care less costly, it makes medical care more scarce — resulting in artificially increasing ancillary costs like longer wait times and poorer service.
Both the “doctor fix” and this portion of the ObamaCare bill intend to address the problems created by price fixing simply by resetting the fixed prices. But that has cost ramifications, especially in Medicaid, where states bear a significant part of the burden. All this did was shift costs for two years from the states to the federal government, and then leave an unfunded mandate for the states to bear after that grace period expires. That allowed Democrats to hide the total cost of the bill by forcing it onto the states. Taxpayers therefore didn’t get the complete cost picture of ObamaCare, as the CBO only scored federal costs. They’ll have to pay higher taxes on the state level to fund this gimmick.
Either Congress has to write another “doctor fix” to get states off the hook and the governors off their backs, or they have to let the states go bankrupt after 2015 with this new unfunded mandate. States already suing over the individual mandate may want to figure out how to push back against federal encroachment on this point, but realistically speaking, that train left the station a long time ago. Either way, the Medicaid reimbursement catch-22 shows the dishonest approach Democrats took in scoring this bill, and why imposing more price fixing on a system already badly damaged by earlier price fixing will doom ObamaCare to failure.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
In for a …..
Never mind.
percysunshine on April 1, 2010 at 1:38 PM
These fascist-Democrats make Bernie Madoff & the Enron guys look good.
rbj on April 1, 2010 at 1:40 PM
And people wonder why I am upset.
Mirimichi on April 1, 2010 at 1:40 PM
and the hits just keep on coming…
what a bloody mess and they can’t blame this on the gop…no siree…
cmsinaz on April 1, 2010 at 1:41 PM
WHERE IN THE HELL DO THESE IDIOTS THINK ALL OF THIS MONEY IS COMING FROM???
Ltlgeneral64 on April 1, 2010 at 1:41 PM
Looking forward to seeing a Republican stand up in public and call Obama a liar and showing the sheeple how, precisely, they have been deceived yet again by O’Bozo the clown.
Jaibones on April 1, 2010 at 1:42 PM
2013 and 2014 – awesome. The changes won’t even be in full swing during those years, either.
reaganaut on April 1, 2010 at 1:42 PM
Where is the Lube? I have a feeling this one is going to hurt.
upinak on April 1, 2010 at 1:42 PM
The hits keep coming.
There is no punishment too severe and/or painful for the Democrats who voted for this and who passed this.
None.
NoDonkey on April 1, 2010 at 1:42 PM
No what doomed ObamaCare to failure is that it was written my wacko Marxist. It is designed to fail.
MobileVideoEngineer on April 1, 2010 at 1:43 PM
and they wonder why they have to keep selling this boondoggle after it has passed….
geez!
cmsinaz on April 1, 2010 at 1:44 PM
Obama’s unicorn will bring it.
angryed on April 1, 2010 at 1:44 PM
GOP must filibuster this. And must filibuster every bill that inludes “reconciliation-enabling language” to prevent another 51 vote cram-down.
Do not allow “doc fix” without compensating cuts in Obamacare spending.
Do it every year until Obamacare is gutted.
SwampYankee on April 1, 2010 at 1:52 PM
Taxes. Lots and lots of taxes.
Doughboy on April 1, 2010 at 1:52 PM
+1
Khun Joe on April 1, 2010 at 1:53 PM
From you. From me. From millions of other ordinary folks who cannot be exempted from the travesties our legislators inflict upon us.
Here’s the deal. Our government folks love playing with OPM (Other People’s Money) as much as the Wall Street guys do. It’s all the same. Wall Street is “too big to fail”. We witnessed this last year, but the truth is that as most of these companies are publicly traded they have a fall-back with the government.
At the same time, Wall Street does the government’s bidding. Sub Prime failure? Look no further than the federal government, its mandates and Wall Street accommodating to make money and cover its a$$.
They are one and the same regardless of party. You are the endless source of tax revenue, the serf, the peasant. If you don’t comply, you will face further fines or imprisonment. Wall Street execs still give themselves outlandish bonuses, and legislators voted their salary increases on an ongoing basis – even in a recession. They also make money from their Pork deals for their ‘family and friends.’
It’s all a game. The winners are your legislators and Wall Street. The losers are the American taxpayers. You’re funding a phenomenal fraud and racket. It puts the Mafia to shame.
Cody1991 on April 1, 2010 at 1:55 PM
I think you guys are missing something here. . . . .
As a physician, let me note that the 21% cut in medicare re-imbursements is a feature, not a bug.
Sure — it will cause more doctors to drop out. But as doctors drop out — that means fewer tests will be ordered, and fewer things will be discovered from those tests, and few procedures will be done — hence the cost of medicare will drop a whole lot more than just the 21% cut to Physicians.
Example 1: If 86 year old Grampa Jones has noticed pain going from his jaw to his neck to his left arm. If he was able to go see his internist, the internist would order a non-invasive stress test which would show critical ischemia of the left main coronary artery, and soon a cardiologist or cardiac surgeon would be doing their thing — all to the cost of tens of thousands of dollars.
But if he can’t get in to see the Internist — instead he wakes up dead in a few weeks, and the cost of his medical care takes a huge drop.
Example 2: Grandma Jones has problems walking. She makes an appointment to see an orthopedic surgeon, but can’t get in for four months — because the orthopedic surgeon decides to limit medicare patients because he can’t survive doing total hips on medicare patients for $1300. So Grandma has to do with a cane — and beside that, no one knows about the anemia that is being caused by a small colon cancer that would have been detected on pre-op lab work and resulted in an expensive colon cancer operation before her total hip. So here medicare saves the cost of a total hip, and the cost of a colon cancer operation — way more than just cutting physician rates 21%.
And because physicians refuse to see Grandpa and Grandma Jones — it’s their fault the two wind up dying, because doctors are greedy SOBs who all golf on Wednesday afternoon, and make $50,000 from chopping off legs and who knows how much from taking out tonsils that don’t need to be taken off. Besides, pain pills dispensed by a nurse are probably all the Jones oldsters really need, anyway. To quote Democratic governor Richard Lamb, “They have a duty to die.”
You can rest assured that’s how Obamacare will work.
Narniaman on April 1, 2010 at 1:56 PM
Obama’s stash…duh!
uknowmorethanme on April 1, 2010 at 1:57 PM
Cloward and Piven
BrianA on April 1, 2010 at 2:02 PM
Sometimes, I feel like I don’t recognize my country anymore.
deidre on April 1, 2010 at 2:06 PM
It’s free, because it comes from Obama’s “stash.” Didn’t you hear the lady waiting in line for free money?
Daggett on April 1, 2010 at 2:06 PM
I have sent questions to Claire McCaskill about this topic. I do not expect an answer as she has yet to respond to any of the more than 30 questions I’ve sent to her over the past 7 months regarding health care reform.
I would encourage others to bombard their Congresscritters with questions as well. One of Alinsky’s rules is to make the target abide by their own rules; a variant on this is to make these jackals at least answer questions about their rules for our health care (can’t realistically expect them to actually abide by their rules).
And answer.
And answer…
At 1-2 questions per day, McCaskill will have upwards of 200 questions from just me by the time November rolls around. Multiply that by just 20 people and chaos ensues…
Tongueboy on April 1, 2010 at 2:07 PM
You are just getting old. It happens to everyone. Accept it, and roll over so the post office can scratch your belly.
percysunshine on April 1, 2010 at 2:08 PM
I just figured this out…
According to the US Debt Clock (google it) the US debt is now $12.7 trillion. there are 27,468 high schools in the US. If you went to every high school in the US and stacked $1 bills packed side by side in stacks covering the entire basketball court 4 1/2 feet deep it would equal the US debt. In ten years it’s projected to be 9 feet deep. Try to visualize that. Every high school in every town and city everywhere.
We are gonna need more high schools.
pappy on April 1, 2010 at 2:09 PM
We need 41 Senators to stand up and just say NO to anything the Dems try to pass until November. In November, we will get them some reinforcements. Now is not the time to play ‘get along.’
GnuBreed on April 1, 2010 at 2:10 PM
Unfortunately the idiots in government have convinced the idiot voters who love getting freebies that the money will come from the never-expanding group of evil rich people.
katiejane on April 1, 2010 at 2:11 PM
After the 2008 election I told a friend of mine that I no longer had a place in this country. He stared at me and said he was shocked to hear me say anything so extreme. He doesn’t any longer.
The cat’s out of the bag, and if people can’t see it they’re asleep or on drugs.
Cody1991 on April 1, 2010 at 2:12 PM
They really don’t care about us people.
Bcs they’ve been getting away with so much for so long, they are so emboldened that the cries & outrage from the public mean nothing to them.
They are safely ensconced away in their towers without having to mix with the unwashed masses.
I honestly woulodn’t be surprised if they initiated martial law & stopped all elections bcs of a ‘national emergency’ like how they need the time to ‘fix’ the economy.
Folks-all I can say is if you think it can never happen, think again.
Badger40 on April 1, 2010 at 2:13 PM
Steny Hoyer on campus today;
Terp Mole on April 1, 2010 at 2:14 PM
If the two people in the examples you just gave were dragged out of their homes and thrown over a cliff, we would call that murder. Funny how the results are the same, just the methods are different.
How about another example.
Two elderly people are in their homes and in the middle of the night, it catches fire. Several members of congress are walking by the house and see the fire and know there are people in the building sleeping. Instead of calling the fire company (too expensive) they call a handy man to come and board up the exits and stand guard over the windows to make sure no one gets out. To extreme?
As you quoted:
I don’t give a rip if these people are forced to face tough questions by some activist in a hallway with a camera. They should be perp walked out of congress!
JellyToast on April 1, 2010 at 2:15 PM
Timmy Geithner has the money. He just needs to run the presses faster. No problem. It’s covered under Obamanomics 101 – Need money? Print it!
GarandFan on April 1, 2010 at 2:15 PM
When all the rich have fled, they will then focus on the property owners, like what happened in Stalin’s russia.
They focused on siezing land from peasant farmers by convincing people how evil & rich they were bcs they had land.
I really can see the govt trying to sieze our land out here in the name of redistributing the wealth to the ‘people’.
Badger40 on April 1, 2010 at 2:15 PM
TheRightMan on April 1, 2010 at 2:16 PM
Narniaman on April 1, 2010 at 1:56 PM
I believe everything you’ve written but even so, Obamacare will still cost us more than anyone could have possibly imagined.
We’ll pay more for reduced access to care, bank on it.
And also that Democrats will tell us it’s a wild success but would be even better if those evil Republicans would just fund it more generously.
NoDonkey on April 1, 2010 at 2:19 PM
That is exactly what needs to be done, using strong, dare I say, inflammatory rhetoric. It is the only way the media will ever cover this issue and anybody other than political junkies will hear about it. As long as they drone on about medicare reimburements, CBO scores, nobody will care. If they come out and make a big stink, the media will take notice and cover it, forcing dems to explain themselves.
Joe Caps on April 1, 2010 at 2:22 PM
The seeds of sedition have been sown
dmann on April 1, 2010 at 2:22 PM
You illustrated 2 perfect examples of why the “Death Panels” topic got the media so fired up. What no one outside of conservatives seems to understand is the power being granted to unelected people who have a proven history of supporting eugenics.
You grant these people power over lives and the sanctity of life goes right out the window. Grandpa Jones isn’t worth the money spent to keep him alive even IF he is able to get treatment.
search4truth on April 1, 2010 at 2:23 PM
Hooda guessed!
rjoco1 on April 1, 2010 at 2:23 PM
If your havin fun now just wait till Grahamnasty and McCain help Pinnochio pass crap and tax and amnasty!
Necktie party anyone?
dhunter on April 1, 2010 at 2:23 PM
It isn’t the docs’ fault. People understand that, and those who don’t soon will.
What many fail to understand is that this isn’t just about the elderly. Younger people may casually toss it all off, however this will affect their parents and eventually themselves.
As much as “liberals” screech about human rights, the rights of interned ‘suspected’ terrorists, illegal aliens and whatever group they love to love….. one thing is obvious… They don’t care much about their own people.
For liberals, “caring” is abstract. It’s always about other people, and the monolithic, rather abstract construct of “government” that should take care of things. It absolves them from the consequences. They don’t want to be personally involved, and they don’t want to be held accountable for the results.
Cody1991 on April 1, 2010 at 2:23 PM
I still want to know why, if this thing was so great already it had to be rammed through against the will if a plural majority, it needs ‘fixes’?
Liam on April 1, 2010 at 2:23 PM
And in addition, why if it is soo great are the Congressmen/women and their staffers exempt from it?
search4truth on April 1, 2010 at 2:25 PM
“Because we got Barack Obama”
dmann on April 1, 2010 at 2:26 PM
I am waiting for the medical TV shows to start their propaganda.
ObamaCare saved this child! If it wasn’t for our new ObamaCare this operation would not have been possible!
We now have the technology from ObamaCare to cure every disease!
Hey,, I just thought of a good TV idea! I new special unit that goes out into the neighborhoods to find those cases that insurance companies refused to cover! A new special unit of caring doctors that have the directive to go through all the old files of people who were turned away at the hospital door, cold, sick and dying and now they have to scour the country to find those people and bring them back to the hospitals before they die and save them with ObamaCare!
How much you want a bet! I said it here first! We shall see!
JellyToast on April 1, 2010 at 2:28 PM
the inevitable outcome of this legislation is so clear. obamacare will run trillions of dollars over budget, will sink the states in red ink, and won’t do a damn thing about healtcare costs except increase them.
the Dems will be eating this crow for 4 presidential election cycles. what ever credibility their party ever had will be lost for a generation.
thanks obamacare..you are the gift that will keep on giving, election after election.
DrW on April 1, 2010 at 2:31 PM
When Medicare and Medicaid pay below cost of providing services, the hospitals and docs shift the cost to the private sector. The private insurance companies then have to pay more and raise their premium rates. At some point they price themselves out of the market. Just what the O so wrong group want.
hip shot on April 1, 2010 at 2:33 PM
This will need weekly fixes until the cows come home.
The joke that just keeps us laughing.
And as nanzy said as we read it we will learn more and more
how funny it is. Laughing is great for ones health.
dragondrop on April 1, 2010 at 2:33 PM
FIFY
Aviator on April 1, 2010 at 2:48 PM
That’s what I told my liberal son. Suggested he start stashing away more money because sooner rather than later his dad and I may be his load to carry. He told me to take the pink pill. LOL
katiejane on April 1, 2010 at 2:51 PM
No, no, no, no, no. Once they’re full, we simply use all that piled cash to pay off the debt. And then we have twice the HS space for all the new kids being born.
Simple.
Is there something in my Kool-Aid ™?
karl9000 on April 1, 2010 at 3:01 PM
He will eventually see things differently. I stared this thing in the face and felt feint, and I quickly realized that others would figure it out.
It isn’t about age. Anyone’s condition can change in a heartbeat. That’s what Palin recognized as she has a child who will always require care. The underlying moral issue is how we treat our own citizens especially those who are in need. Liberals always scream about this, but they conveniently relegate those people to the trash bin. They never understand that they could end up there like the rest of us.
Cody1991 on April 1, 2010 at 3:02 PM
This outfit needs to be prosecuted under RICO.
Mason on April 1, 2010 at 3:02 PM
California practices Obamanomics regularly and lookie here:
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9EQEAHG0&show_article=1
Yep, no more car plants in California. I wouldn’t move to California for anything. It is the worst state in the Union.
andy85719 on April 1, 2010 at 3:06 PM
O/T – The picture of Pelosi carrying the gavel from when Medicare became law – is oh so appropriate – as she gaveled in another government program that will go broke – this one before it is even fully implemented!
Oopsdaisy on April 1, 2010 at 3:59 PM
The one line doc fix
Allow doctors to deduct the unreimbursed portion of charity care from their income.
This would include allowing doctors to deduct the portion that Medicare, Medicaid, SCHIP and another other government welfare health care program don’t pay.
Not only would this be a tax cut that promotes better health care marketplace and relationships, but it would not have to be tinkered with. One and done…
Almost overnight, most health care providers would quickly adopt a sliding scale system to provide care to the needy, customized to their community. It would be top notch care, not the red tape limited care that politicians allow…
It would even work as a system to provide health care if Medicare, Medicaid, SCHIP and Obamacare go bankrupt and go away.
Yes, the government might see a reduction in tax revenue from health care providers, but then if the marketplace can deal with this issue without the heavy hand of politicians, why should government get any credit or revenue from a marketplace that is allowed to finally take care of itself AND others.
Doctors, not politicians, provide health care…
drfredc on April 1, 2010 at 4:31 PM
“Medicaid reimbursement catch-22 shows the dishonest approach Democrats took in scoring this bill”
Medicaid is already the lowest payor. They also play the no-pay game. They routinely just don’t pay about 1/3 of their bills. It is up to the provider to find this and re-bill. Added to that, there is a time limit – if they don’t pay the bill within 12 months , they’re off the hook – claiming the provider missed the filing period. What will happen in 2 years after the Feds stop filling the gap ? More of the same – their rates of reimbursement will go down, and it will become even more difficult to get paid anything. For this reason, my Family Practice no longer accepts new Medicaid patients. We will maintain those charts we already have. FWIW, we also have begun limiting new Medicare – 1 per month. There’s more to come.
humdinger on April 1, 2010 at 6:23 PM
nice post ed
Anti-Harkonnen Freedom Fighter on April 1, 2010 at 9:48 PM
Not only that, but he makes a few bucks on the side as a zombie for hire.
PackerBronco on April 1, 2010 at 10:30 PM