CBO: Debt level will rise to 90% of GDP in nine years
posted at 10:40 am on March 27, 2010 by Ed Morrissey
When Barack Obama starts talking like a deficit hawk … grab your wallets. According to the latest CBO analysis of the Obama administration’s budget projections, the US will add almost a trillion dollars in debt a year for the next nine years, bringing the national debt to 90% of our annual GDP. The most amazing part of this is that the new projection only exceeds Obama’s by $1.2 trillion over the same period:
President Obama’s fiscal 2011 budget will generate nearly $10 trillion in cumulative budget deficits over the next 10 years, $1.2 trillion more than the administration projected, and raise the federal debt to 90 percent of the nation’s economic output by 2020, the Congressional Budget Office reported Thursday.
In its 2011 budget, which the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) released Feb. 1, the administration projected a 10-year deficit total of $8.53 trillion. After looking it over, CBO said in its final analysis, released Thursday, that the president’s budget would generate a combined $9.75 trillion in deficits over the next decade.
“An additional $1.2 trillion in debt dumped on [GDP] to our children makes a huge difference,” said Brian Riedl, a budget analyst at the conservative Heritage Foundation. “That represents an additional debt of $10,000 per household above and beyond the federal debt they are already carrying.”
The federal public debt, which was $6.3 trillion ($56,000 per household) when Mr. Obama entered office amid an economic crisis, totals $8.2 trillion ($72,000 per household) today, and it’s headed toward $20.3 trillion (more than $170,000 per household) in 2020, according to CBO’s deficit estimates.
In this case, a picture may be worth a thousand million billion trillion quadrillion words:
The worst deficit under a Republican Congress was $400 billion in FY2004. It’s also worth noting that the last budget produced by a Republican Congress spent $2.77 trillion (FY2007), and had a deficit of less than half of that peak. While Republican Congresses added almost $800 billion in annual spending to the budget in six years — an indefensible expansion — that pales in comparison to the $1.1 trillion added by Democratic Congresses in just three years. Under those conditions, the massive budget deficits shown in the CBO’s graph are simply unavoidable, and the best of the next ten years is double the worst of the Republican Congress from 2001-7.
Don’t expect that debt to come cheap, either. We’re already seeing signs that our interest rates will have to go up in order to sell more paper, which will cause the deficit projections here to actually fall short of reality. We could be looking at a collapse scenario where we can’t borrow enough to keep up with our interest payments by the time this decade concludes.










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »
All your economic base are belong to us.
Vashta.Nerada on March 27, 2010 at 10:41 AM
Obama isnt morgaging our future he is destroying it.
William Amos on March 27, 2010 at 10:41 AM
And the hits just keep on coming….
JamesLee on March 27, 2010 at 10:42 AM
The reverse Reagan.
If you wanted the country to collapse you wouldn’t be doing anything differently.
BadgerHawk on March 27, 2010 at 10:42 AM
The Californication of the nation.
Speakup on March 27, 2010 at 10:43 AM
Which is fine with Obama, because he’s term-limited, and when the bill comes due will simply blame the problem on the economic policies of whomever the Republican president is who succeeds him. And the big media will shovel it out as gospel.
jon1979 on March 27, 2010 at 10:43 AM
Stalin kill his millions Obama spent his trillions.
William Amos on March 27, 2010 at 10:44 AM
Look at the drop between 2011 and 2012 – it’s the steepest drop on the graph (although of course a pittance in the big picture).
I’m sure the timing of that isn’t a coincidence.
Missy on March 27, 2010 at 10:45 AM
At some point, a collapse scenario becomes the preferred option. I think we are near it already.
Vashta.Nerada on March 27, 2010 at 10:45 AM
“Will no-one rid me of this troublesome priest?”
~ King Henry II
honsy on March 27, 2010 at 10:45 AM
Cloward–Piven dreamed of this.
the_nile on March 27, 2010 at 10:46 AM
Any ideas what this means to the rest of the world? The US is one quarter of the world’s economy.
Crux Australis on March 27, 2010 at 10:47 AM
In my area of expertise, I can give very precise information when I get the right numbers.
I’m not an economist. I would expect economists from coast to coast to be telling us exactly what this means. Does this mean total collapse?
Where are the economists?
Could you guys get King Banian to give a tutorial here? Last time I heard him on this topic, he wasn’t worried about high levels of debt. He didn’t think the country was even close to meltdown levels. Has he changed his tune?
King, where art thou?
jeff_from_mpls on March 27, 2010 at 10:48 AM
DiTech Mortgage commercial in 2018:
“At 24.5%, we have the lowest new home loan rate nationwide!”
BobMbx on March 27, 2010 at 10:48 AM
Did you happen to see any of the Road Warrior movies?
Just call me “pig killer”
BobMbx on March 27, 2010 at 10:50 AM
A rising tide lifts all boats. An economic tsunami wipes out a lot of poor and middle class people.
BadgerHawk on March 27, 2010 at 10:50 AM
So true. My parents bought their first house under Carter, financed at a cool 18%.
BadgerHawk on March 27, 2010 at 10:51 AM
moveon.org’s Child’s Play ad should be a staple of these types of posts.
WashJeff on March 27, 2010 at 10:51 AM
All part of the plan. Anyone who thinks otherwise is naive, delusional, or dishonest.
The short term goal is to create such a toxic environment that the so-called Debt Commission will have no choice but to recommend that taxes be raised far beyond anything we’ve ever seen (think VAT.) And the Marxist-in-Chief will happily point out that a bi-partisan commission made the recommendation and we have no choice but to carry it out. Deflection of actual responsibility. One thing that Obama is skilled at.
BardMan on March 27, 2010 at 10:51 AM
This is as blatant an attack on the USA as Pearl Harbor was in 1941, and it is not by surprise at all. Obama plans to destroy the American dollar and with it the American military and roll us up into a weak sister North American Province of his new world government. Has he ever told a truth yet? His key CO2 tax will finish our burial before another election ever gets to happen here.He did Israel a real favor by abandoning them. Now how can we get Obama to abandon us so that we can get real leadership and get back into the fight .
jimw on March 27, 2010 at 10:52 AM
Obamanomics = George Soros get rich quick scheme.
William Amos on March 27, 2010 at 10:52 AM
With the state of the economy where is the revenue coming from to decrease the deficit? They just spent 1.5 trillion dollars to give free stuff away. One’s liabilities do not decrease until one develops a method of increasing one’s income.
thomasaur on March 27, 2010 at 10:54 AM
My next portfolio diversification will be in to Spam and rabbit trapping devices.
abobo on March 27, 2010 at 10:56 AM
I don’t believe these left wing Democrats even care what happens to the Republic . . . of equal disgust is the possibility that they lack the intellect to even comprehend what they are doing to it.
rplat on March 27, 2010 at 10:57 AM
Jeff_from_mpls, an economist is not needed here. If any individual, family, or business had debt that was 90% of annual income, default and bankruptcy would not be far away. Interest payments already soak up a lot of government revenues, and that interest will soak up a lot more later on. The end is near.
Pelayo on March 27, 2010 at 10:57 AM
Can we fast forward to November?
How can any Dem win an election anywhere except the bluest of blue states?
This is creates the opportunity for some sobering, adult campaign ads.
BuckeyeSam on March 27, 2010 at 10:57 AM
Obama thinks he can change basic math with a rousing speech.
zmdavid on March 27, 2010 at 11:00 AM
Time to move to outback Australia I think. Sydney and Melbourne are going to be wiped out.
Crux Australis on March 27, 2010 at 11:00 AM
Didn’t Obama say, Bring it on ?
Will Amerika survive until November?
Sandybourne on March 27, 2010 at 11:05 AM
Ummm…How does CBO calculate GDP in the future? Do they take into account, at all, that GDP simply ain’t gonna grow under these conditions?
TubbyHubby on March 27, 2010 at 11:06 AM
The good news: we won’t get to that point.
The bad news: once the debt service passes 50% of the GDP, only the major corp’s will be left standing; the main tier of the general economy will be a wasteland [hello 'grey and black' markets].
Watch cities burn when it gets to that stage.
The rest of the planet?
You really don’t want to know.
You’ll sleep better for it.
Probably.
CPT. Charles on March 27, 2010 at 11:07 AM
Domestic Enemy in Chief.
Alden Pyle on March 27, 2010 at 11:07 AM
Party time as the Great Satan is down for the count!
Then the next morning comes around, you turn over and are hit with the truth. There really is something to “Beer Goggles”.
RagTag on March 27, 2010 at 11:08 AM
Cloward-Piven. When the collapse comes, someone will have to be there to fill the vacuum. Normally, those who caused it will step in as “the only ones who can fix it.” To see how this works, pay attention to the anarchy piece in this video.
Keep your guns handy and ammo stocked up so we can prevent that from happening.
Kafir on March 27, 2010 at 11:08 AM
No worries or urgency, though – we get to vote a couple of times before then. That’ll fix everything.
Midas on March 27, 2010 at 11:08 AM
Ask Zimbabwe how much their economy can grow under its debt.
William Amos on March 27, 2010 at 11:08 AM
“We liked the CBO last week when we needed to pass health care, but now we think they are full of shiite and should be disbanded.”
-Domestic Terrorist Party
Bishop on March 27, 2010 at 11:09 AM
Are you implying he can’t?
Facts please. I want links, 8×10 glossies with circles and arrows and a paragraph on the back of each explaining what it means.
RagTag on March 27, 2010 at 11:10 AM
We are much closer than 9 years.
elderberry on March 27, 2010 at 11:10 AM
Even if the republicans sweep in and repeal 0bamacare, we’re still screwed.
We would need to call a constitutional convention, and readopt the pre-progressive Constitution and body of laws, and end social security and the rest of the unfunded mandates that are dragging us under. And that will never happen.
Rebar on March 27, 2010 at 11:11 AM
Oh yeah, almost forgot to add:
The government would never do this. Go back to your coffee and rest easy.
Bishop on March 27, 2010 at 11:11 AM
“HI, my name is Barack Obama, can you spell V-A-T, boys and girls?”
GarandFan on March 27, 2010 at 11:11 AM
I’m not pro-debt by any stretch, and this 90% of GDP thing in DC scares the crap outta me, but… just about anyone who’s ever bought a house has experienced a debt situation where their debt was *more* than 90% of their annual income.
I guess it depends on the nature and details of the debt, the interest, the term, etc? 90% of annual income as credit card debt would almost certainly be catastrophic. Mortgage debt, not at all.
*ponders*
Midas on March 27, 2010 at 11:12 AM
That’s what it seems like to me.
Which makes me wonder where the economists are?
The global warmie nuts are good at finding microphones every time we get a hot day in America, and yet economists are sitting with their thumbs up their orifices as our economy burns like the Hindenberg.
What the hell?
jeff_from_mpls on March 27, 2010 at 11:13 AM
The geopolitical turmoil will dwarf our domestic problems, as nations use their military force to take commodities they need to survive.
bloviator on March 27, 2010 at 11:14 AM
Anyone surprised? According to 0 and wife, they were struggling, deep in debt, unable to manage their personal budget before the income from his book. Now he is managing our treasury the same way.
Oleta on March 27, 2010 at 11:14 AM
And raiding our 401k and IRA plans.
“There’s no other way. Collapse is upon us, the time for talk is over.”
Midas on March 27, 2010 at 11:14 AM
I think the CBO is late to the game. Funny how these numbers come out after the HCR bill passed. I know the CBO is supposed to be a non bipartisan group but I think now they really don’t matter much, espically with zero at the helm tweaking numbers.
Brat4life on March 27, 2010 at 11:14 AM
And still after all that we’d need to pay off the trillions we owe.
Were in a big hole and we haven’t even stopped digging yet, in fact, every year we dig even faster.
zmdavid on March 27, 2010 at 11:15 AM
I think the key is to find more ways to spend money that we don’t have like this HC bill. /
CWforFreedom on March 27, 2010 at 11:15 AM
And liberal Dem’s still today love to bring up how Dubya and Repubs added to the deficit when, as stated, it pales to what Obama and the Dem’s have done in a little over a year.
They don’t like to talk about that tho.
This country is going to be in a lot of trouble. Much more so than we are right now. I don’t envy the next president at all…but I’m sure whomever it is won’t blame Obama ad nauseum for all the inherited problems.
JetBoy on March 27, 2010 at 11:16 AM
Yeah, i was thinking this yesterday as well. There’s been a bunch of stuff and comments come out of various places this week (CBO, AP, Congresspersons) that must’ve been held back until after it was passed – there’s no way they just came up with this stuff lamentably just a day or few too late.
Midas on March 27, 2010 at 11:16 AM
The most sobering aspect of all this is that a large segment of our population still believes the proglibarxists are doing a good job. I’m starting to be a proponent of testing people prior to giving them the right to vote — a little math, a simple compound interest question, throw in a few history questions, and, of course, a drug test. Why the test, because anybody who would vote for these clowns is A) dumber than a box of rocks, or B) stoned out of their minds.
ClanDerson on March 27, 2010 at 11:17 AM
But now that HC has passed they are going to go after your guns. There has been hints at it in some articles. I’m pretty sure one was posted here yesterday.
I do expect that gun control will be a top of the list item prior to the fall elections. If a gun ban is put in place I do expect 70% or more of the gun owners will meekly turn theirs in just as they did in England and Australia. The SCOTUS may strike the ban down but by that time most of the guns will already have been turned in so it will be a moot point. Especially when the feds cave and say it’s all right to own guns but illegal to sell, transport or use them for anything but sport hunting.
RagTag on March 27, 2010 at 11:17 AM
Lost decade, here we come.
Count to 10 on March 27, 2010 at 11:18 AM
It’s coming, just hold on. We have no idea what they are going to try and cram down our throats til next Jan. I’m just hoping that John McCain will stick to his promise to thwart the rest of the dems agenda for the year and that means bi-partisian amnesty and crap and trade.
Brat4life on March 27, 2010 at 11:18 AM
Not hard to do when most Americans can’t do basic math.
labrat on March 27, 2010 at 11:18 AM
You misunderstand. When you buy a house, that’s a FIXED debt. It’s not like you keep buying a new house every year. The plan is that you’ll eventually pay the debt down and get ahead.
What’s happening here is that the 90% debt rate will keep going because America’s income can NEVER grow to outpace the debt unless you enslave the population to abusive tax rates or… gulp… ration medical services.
Skywise on March 27, 2010 at 11:20 AM
What can they be possibly thinking? Even a socialist like him would rather have a functioning nation rather than a ruin…wouldn’t he?
PattyJ on March 27, 2010 at 11:21 AM
Mortgage debt is backed by collateral. What the goernment is bulking up on is precisely like credit card debt.
Vashta.Nerada on March 27, 2010 at 11:23 AM
I might have laughed at this a few years ago…but not today.
labrat on March 27, 2010 at 11:23 AM
The positive news is that the unemployed will find ready work in the domestic security force.
Just think, William Ayers strutting around like Himmler, directing an army of former union thugs.
Good times.
Bishop on March 27, 2010 at 11:25 AM
YOU LIE. Obama the Magnificent’s percentage of debt is no greater a percentage than when BOOOSH started an illegal war to fund his oil buddies.
Yeah I’ve had this discussion with leftists…
And if I were President? I’d have no problem blaming Obama and socialism for all the problems ad nauseum as a constant reminder to what tyranny looks like and does.
Skywise on March 27, 2010 at 11:25 AM
Define “functioning”. Zimbabwe is functioning, in a manner of speaking. Cambodia at the height of Pol Pot’s terror was functioning, sort of. North Korea functions, in a way.
The question to ask is if there is more to PBHO than meets the eye.
Bishop on March 27, 2010 at 11:28 AM
Sheeitt man! My man Obowma beat that in one year! Hell, he’ll average more than that per year. //sarc
The left is strangely quiet on fiscal matters these days…
2ipa on March 27, 2010 at 11:29 AM
Look at Greece – that is our future. Except Germany won’t be able to bail us out.
ajackson on March 27, 2010 at 11:30 AM
ugh. i’m going to be sick.
Even though I’m somewhat of a numbers guy, these graphs and figures really help bring the magnitude of this fiscal problem home. Also, that guy that did all the pennies on the table object lesson (maybe on reason.tv or youtube) regarding the deficit was very helpful. I’d like to see more of that to really help drive home the scope of the problem we face in order to break it down Pookie-style so the average dude can get the meaning of it.
+2
ted c on March 27, 2010 at 11:31 AM
Can we put Barry in jail for killing our nation through debt (from O-care TARP 1 and 2, Stimulus 1 and 2) and using ‘smart diplomacy’ to alienate our allies and embolden our enemies? Impeachment is too good for him.
nyx on March 27, 2010 at 11:31 AM
I give it 5 years or less the way things are going now.
Still find the silence of the left amusing. “OMG BUSH $400 billion record deficits!!1″ and here comes Obama with $1 trillion+ deficits and they don’t even bat an eye.
modnar on March 27, 2010 at 11:32 AM
A more important metric is the debt servicing to income ratio. When one buys a home the target for debt servicing + home insurance + property tax is 31% of income.
The same thinking applies to the federal government. Unfortunately, the debt servicing to GDP ratio keeps getting bigger.
WashJeff on March 27, 2010 at 11:34 AM
Oh My God that is unsustainable.
Jdripper on March 27, 2010 at 11:34 AM
It will be a functioning nation. Cuba is very functional from a socio-moralist perspective. People aren’t doing evil in the name of selfishness (ie capitalism), everybody gets educated in proper thinking and everybody has free health care.
From Star Trek – I, Mudd:
Skywise on March 27, 2010 at 11:34 AM
Maybe at some point Israel will launch operation American Freedom.
labrat on March 27, 2010 at 11:35 AM
Heh… and from the same episode-
Star Trek- I, Mudd
Skywise on March 27, 2010 at 11:37 AM
Would the progressives accept being the new nobility lording over a new class of serfs/peons in a substance (“sustainable”) agricultural economy?
Every shred of evidence points to “yes”.
Rebar on March 27, 2010 at 11:37 AM
These numbers mean nothing. That chart shows the deficit going DOWN over the next four years…
HELLO: Government spending, not even counting any of these future allocations, has gone through the roof in the past two years. Meanwhile, the tax base is rapidly SHRINKING. It was down 24% as of last April, and is heading for an even bigger dump this year.
All of these “analyses” are based on the assumption that the economy will rise and fall according to free market principles, regardless of how much money the government spends, taxes or prints.
In other words: all of these numbers are based on the assumption that Communism works perfectly.
logis on March 27, 2010 at 11:39 AM
Such is the power of hypocrisy.
venividivici on March 27, 2010 at 11:43 AM
Pretty soon every month the House and Senate will have to introduce a new raise the debt ceiling bill.
Brat4life on March 27, 2010 at 11:44 AM
One thing to remember is that to taxpayers it’s “debt”, but to the Left and its unionized cohorts in the Federal workforce it’s “salary and benefits”. Even the taxes they pay on their own salaries get recycled into their next paycheck.
venividivici on March 27, 2010 at 11:47 AM
I never did like the idea of farming, so I suppose I would need to refuse them.
Bishop on March 27, 2010 at 11:48 AM
msm:*crickets chirping* on that little factoid
cmsinaz on March 27, 2010 at 11:50 AM
What does he care? He’ll be out of office (hopefully as of Jan 2013) and probably not even living in the US by then. If he gets his druthers, after this he’ll be King of the UN and dictating to the world from that perch. Nothing’s too ambitious for this guy.
Missy on March 27, 2010 at 11:51 AM
Two things there. One, some hard leftards may want to do that, heck, they never stopped wanting it. But between the crap and betrayed vote and the Health Control Fiasco, they have not only burned through their political capital, they have it mortaged to the hilt. Only a few hard core pols will have the stomach to go along with it, most will
shyrun quickly away from any attempt to bring it up.And two, rights are much like entitlement programs; once you have it and exercise it, one is often very unwilling to give it up. And with BarryO being the best thing evah for firearms ownership, that’s more and more people enjoying their second amendment rights.
If they DO decide to try this, I doubt it will get far. And if it does, we just redouble our own efforts.
JamesLee on March 27, 2010 at 11:52 AM
Here is a question I have; Now after amnesty is passed, and the economy is in ruins, and we have to completely gut our military and leave every other country around the globe – will we accept immigrants from Poland, Ukraine, South Korea, Taiwan, etc… with the same open arms as the dems are extending for the current special interest group?
Make no mistake, we won’t be able to fund a global security force, and that is exactly what the progressives want.
So, if things continue… actually not sure if it’s an if anymore, the damage is already horrific. It’s more of a when. Anyway, once we downsize and pull back, a lot of our allies are in some serious trouble.
See, when the US crashes, it will take the whole world with it. It won’t just be the fact that Russia, China, North Korea, Iran will be emboldened by our retreat, they will be in severe economic distress and will need wars to stay in power.
I’m so glad a lot of stupid, stupid people wanted to make history.
reaganaut on March 27, 2010 at 11:53 AM
So since this is a CBO estimate, we can expect the time frame to be half what is projected?
catmman on March 27, 2010 at 11:59 AM
Freedom!
–BleedsBlue
…Success!
—crr6
daesleeper on March 27, 2010 at 12:00 PM
A firearm ban would be difficult, 80 million gun owners is a demographic the ‘rats don’t want against them.
Doesn’t mean they won’t make it impossible to make guns useless through various means though; I believe the current push is to serial number every, single bullet. That alone would destroy the ammo industry and everyone’s guns would become nice paperweights.
Bishop on March 27, 2010 at 12:01 PM
YIKES!.
.
Not only is the shining city gone, the hill has been leveled!
.
Hmmm….let’s see….where to move, where to move??? Canada?
JeffVader on March 27, 2010 at 12:01 PM
zerohedge: Final Q4 GDP Revision Comes In At 5.6%, Total Real Debt To GDP 130.6%
Denninger: Social Security: “Here It Comes”
USA! USA!
Rae on March 27, 2010 at 12:02 PM
Why am I worried about credit score?
This is the pure destruction of the US imo.
ORconservative on March 27, 2010 at 12:03 PM
Perhaps there is some difference in how the variables are calculated, but this website shows that we are already past 90% debt-to-GDP. Excerpt of the data:
Year/GDP-US $ billion/Gross Public Debt-fed %GDP
2000 9951.5 57.02
2001 10286.2 56.46
2002 10642.3 58.52
2003 11142.1 60.88
2004 11867.8 62.18
2005 12638.4 62.77
2006 13398.9 63.49
2007 14077.6 63.99
2008 14441.4 69.15
2009 14258.2 83.29
2010 14623.9 94.27
The historical chart at that site is interesting. The USA peaked at ~125% post-WWII, but was on a steep downward trend until the mid-80s… when the ratio shot up again.
We have never had a sustained period where our accumulated debt exceeded our annual GDP. I have to think that it would have sweeping effects on the character of our nation. Japan has a debt-to-GDP ratio nearing 200%, and it has reduced them to a bit player on the world stage. What are we doing to ourselves?
These data need to be more widely known… a better graph would make a great Tea Party sign.
blueguitarbob on March 27, 2010 at 12:09 PM
Plan Obama to undermine, undo and dismantle AmeriKKKa is right on course.
profitsbeard on March 27, 2010 at 12:27 PM
What blueguitarbob said.
We are already at 90%+. If this is what CBO does how can they possibly be scoring legislation?
jukin on March 27, 2010 at 12:29 PM
Speaking of which…
Government Caused the Meltdown
Rae on March 27, 2010 at 12:32 PM
Strangely CRR missing from this thread.
CWforFreedom on March 27, 2010 at 12:34 PM
Strangely, young Americans are already paying the debt to which older Americans have obligated them, and they seem prepared to go right on paying the debt, even as it increases. They resemble pack animals, standing patiently while their masters load them up.
Kralizec on March 27, 2010 at 1:07 PM
Related topic: Let no lawful deed go unpunished.
Henry Waxman (CA, O-Care enforcer) is ready to haul corporations before his committee for revealing the liabilities that O-care will impose on them.
http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZjU2Mzc0NTEwZTk2NGEyMzVjZmQ1M2VkODNkM2JhMWI=
onlineanalyst on March 27, 2010 at 1:23 PM
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »