Poll: Obama 45, Romney 41; Update: 54% think Obama will lose in 2012

posted at 7:31 pm on March 25, 2010 by Allahpundit

Believe it or not, this may end up being Romney’s best argument in the primaries. Electability, pure and simple. Sure, he’ll do what he can to salve the wound that RomneyCare has left on his campaign, but that scar will be with him forever now. The difference in places like New Hampshire and Florida won’t be his posturing about repealing O-Care; potentially, it’ll be the fact that Mitt, perhaps alone among major Republican figures, stands a chance at beating The One. People will shudder at me saying that since that was also the argument for McCain, but the landscape in two years will be different from 2008. Come 2012, conservatives will be so frantic to stop Obama that electability really might be enough, RomneyCare or not.

Emphasis on “might.”

Romney is the clear leader of the GOP field. He holds support from 29% of the 415 GOPers and GOP leaners included in the poll, 10 points ahead of Huckabee and 11 points up on Palin. Gingrich clocks in at 13% with Bush at 8%. Sen. John Thune (R-SD) and IN Gov. Mitch Daniels each earn 1%.

GOPers also see Romney as one of the party’s top spokespeople. When asked to name the party’s major spokesperson, 14% settled on Romney while 14% came up with Sen. John McCain (R-AZ). Gingrich finished at 10%, just ahead of conservative talkers Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh, at 9%.

The topline numbers: Obama leads Mitt by four, Huckabee by eight, Gingrich and Jeb Bush by 12, and Palin by … 18. Not enough primary look-ahead fun for you? Well, here’s what the DNC put out yesterday in order to provide a little political cover for the individual mandate. Don’t fixate on the spot’s pedigree; you’ll be seeing attack ads just like this from Republicans against Romney come next year. I take his basic point — the mandate is a way to address an inefficiency in the market by eliminating free-riders — but to paint a coercive policy enforced by new IRS hires as a “conservative solution” will be an awfully tough sell two years from now. In fact, compare and contrast this Mitt highlight reel with the clip of Obama dumping on Hillary’s mandate during the Democratic primaries. Who sounds more conservative, soundbite for soundbite?

Update: Minutes after I posted this, CNN came out with a new poll of its own: Romney 22, Palin 18, Huckabee 17. You’ll find a fun detail below, although I’d advise not reading too much into it. As of January 1995, 65 percent thought Clinton would lose his reelection bid.

o-2012

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 4 5 6

Scott Brown would be the perfect candidate to defeat Bambi. Nobody knew who Bambi was and he won — the news media assured his win. Scott Brown could easily do the same thing….

Travis1 on March 27, 2010 at 12:24 AM

Say Goodbye to Mitt Romney

inchdeep on March 27, 2010 at 12:26 AM

Romney can’t win,he’s just another RINO.It will be McCain,Dole all over again.We can’t keep nominating these people.

badpenny on March 27, 2010 at 11:23 AM

…and I find it no more offensive than the chronic Palin bashing that exists on this site.

I take it you are busy policing the ‘Palin Witch Dr’ and the ’she believes the world is 3,000 years old’ comments as well?

Mr Purple on March 26, 2010 at 6:01 AM

Bashing a politician is not offensive. If you can’t handle people bashing a politician, you should grow some thicker skin.

Secondly, I haven’t seen the Palin Witch Dr. or her comments. So how can I defend what I have not seen?

Anyways, your comments about the LDS faith were tasteless, offensive and based on incorrect facts.

Conservative Samizdat on March 27, 2010 at 1:22 PM

Being under 50 percent approval for an incumbent is consider a sure sign of trouble. And remember we still have 2 1/2 years of future bumbles to look forward too.

Fred 2 on March 27, 2010 at 4:41 PM

Jinfidel, you are clearly ignorant about the details of RomneyCare. Romney did foresee the financial problem and tried to veto the Democrats costly provisions but was overridden.

If you would like to see MORE facts on how Romney tried veto democratic proposals but was overriden, go here.

Conservative Samizdat on March 26, 2010 at 12:01 AM

Uhm … it’s not called “RomneyCare” because he vetoed it.

He worked with Democrats to craft a system he was proud of …

When then-Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney signed into law the nation’s most far-reaching state health care reform proposal, it was widely expected to be a centerpiece of his presidential campaign. In fact Governor Romney bragged that he would “steal” the traditionally Democratic issue of health care. “Issues which have long been the province of the Democratic Party to claim as their own will increasingly move to the Republican side of the aisle,” he told Bloomberg News Service shortly after signing the bill. He told other reporters that the biggest difference between his health care plan and Hillary Clinton’s was “mine got passed and hers didn’t.”

Mitt’s own statements after he passed RomneyCare indicate that he envisioned himself as some kind of new Republican that was capable of stealing social welfare issues away from the Democrats.

Now … many would re-write history to make it appear that Mitt Romney was simply a little dutch boy with his finger in a socialist dyke. It’s not reality – and his statements at the time prove that.

HondaV65 on March 27, 2010 at 11:14 PM

I respect Mitt Romney, but arguing his electability on the basis that he is 4 points BEHIND Obama is a bit much. Also, in 2008, Romney did not poll well in the general electorate. While it is true that no Republican except for John McCain did poll well in 2008, Romney was often the Republican with the worst poll numbers. So I don’t know how poll numbers, particularly at this point, are a plus for Romney.

My gut instinct is that the GOP candidate for President in 2012 won’t be Romney. I think that my instinct is based on two factors. First, Romney will be hurt because Massachusetts RomneyCare will be associated with what is already an unpopular ObamaCare. Second, there are going to be foreign policy disasters for America. Obama is inexperienced and ill equipped to deal with foreign policy, military matters and national security. Where he has adopted GW Bush policies (Iraq and Afghanistan), we will be O.K.. But where Obama is off on his appeasement-minded own, there will be trouble. We will need someone as POTUIS who knows foreign policy, military matters and national security.

Phil Byler on March 28, 2010 at 7:39 AM

Comment pages: 1 4 5 6