Do they have the votes? Update: Nye a nay; Update: Stupak Dozen member caves; Update: Stupak says a deal is close
posted at 10:08 am on March 21, 2010 by Ed Morrissey
It’s getting harder to tell whether Democrats themselves know what’s happening any more. CNN quotes two leading House Democrats saying two different things this morning in its report on the ObamaCare push on the Hill:
Democrats have the 216 votes needed to pass health care reform legislation in the House on Sunday, the chairman of the House Democratic Caucus told CNN.
“This is a historic day and we are happy warriors,” Rep. John Larson, D- Connecticut, told CNN’s “State of the Union.” He added, “We’ve got the votes.”
But the chief deputy whip in the House, Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Florida, cautioned, “We don’t have a hard 216 right now.” Schultz made the statement to “Fox News Sunday” just as Larson was speaking to CNN.
Wasserman Schultz added, “I firmly believe we will have 216.”
Meanwhile, not only does it look like liberal Loretta Sanchez is a no, it also looks like she’s MIA:
As their whip efforts narrow to just a handful of Members, House Democratic leaders are facing an unlikely problem vote: Rep. Loretta Sanchez (D-Calif.).
Sanchez was nowhere to be found on Saturday — she was in Florida on a fundraising jaunt, two Democratic sources said — and while leaders expected her to return for the Sunday vote on final passage, they weren’t assured. What’s more, leaders now list the Orange County Democrat as a “no” vote.
Sanchez’s office did not return a request for comment Saturday evening. She cast her last vote shortly after 6 p.m. Friday and missed all seven recorded votes on Saturday, a review of the record shows.
Democratic hand-wringing about her status — geographically and intentionally — underlines just how tight the margin has become for leaders trying to zero in on 216 votes as the clock ticks down to their appointed deadline. Leaders are still hunting for a winning coalition of votes — and still struggling for a breakthrough abortion fix that will convert three or four holdouts angling for tougher protections against public funding of the procedure.
She may not be the only Democrat to sneak out of DC today, either. Gene Taylor, a Mississippi Democrat voting against the bill, warned his fellow no-voting colleagues to get the hell out of Dodge after casting the vote:
A Democrat who has long committed to opposing healthcare reform legislation has advised his fellow defectors that they should vote no early on Sunday and then immediately leave the House chamber.
Otherwise, Rep. Gene Taylor (D-Miss.) told The Hill, they will be treated “like a piñata.” …
The tactics of House leaders during what is billed as a 15-minute vote are important. It is likely that some firm no votes on the Democratic side will vote right away while others, at the request of House leaders, will wait to register their no until the tally reaches the magic number of 216. Once it does, politically vulnerable Democrats will likely cast their no votes.
But if getting to 216 is a problem, Democratic leaders may lean on these members to change their minds.
That doesn’t sound like a caucus confident of today’s events. I’ll add more updates as the day moves along.
Update: Here’s the schedule for today, via Daniel Foster and the Boss Emeritus:
2 p.m.: The House will debate for one hour the rules of debate for the reconciliation bill and the Senate bill.
3 p.m.: The House will vote to end debate and vote on the rules of the debate.
3:15 p.m.: The House will debate the reconciliation package for two hours.
5:15 p.m.: The House will vote on the reconciliation package.
5:30 p.m.: The House will debate for 15 minutes on a Republican substitute and then vote on the substitute.
6 p.m.: The House will vote on the final reconciliation package.
6:15 p.m.: If the reconciliation bill passes, the House will immediately vote on the Senate bill, without debate.
Expect these times to slide. As the debate moves forward and as votes get hard to find, the House may find themselves into the long hours of the night before getting to the end.
Update II: Rep. Glenn Nye (D-VA) is a nay:
Citing potential problems for TRICARE recipients, the cost of the bill, and cuts to children’s hospitals, Congressman Glenn Nye announced this evening that he will vote against adopting the health care proposal under consideration in the House of Representatives.
“Over the past year, I have spoken with countless small business owners, families, medical professionals, and average citizens across Virginia’s 2nd District, and it became very clear that this bill was not the right solution for Virginia’s health care challenges,” said Congressman Nye. “There were many strong points in this bill that I would have been happy to support individually, but the package as a whole had serious problems.”
The original version of legislation in the House had specifically exempted TRICARE from being affected. However, when the final bill language was released on Thursday afternoon, it was revealed that neither the Senate bill nor the reconciliation package contained an exemption for TRICARE.
“Our military families need to be able to count on their health care benefits, and I am not willing to risk negative consequences for our military personnel and their families, particularly at a time when our troops are serving overseas in harm’s way,” said Nye.
Update III: Chris Carney (D-PA) is a yes:
I am voting for this legislation because all Americans should have the same insurance choices enjoyed by members of Congress and their families. If it’s good enough for members of Congress, it is good enough for the people they represent.
Carney represents PA-10, becoming in 2006 the first Democrat to represent that district in 45 years. He won with just 52.9% of the vote in 2008, in a district that John McCain won by nine points. My guess is that Carney won’t be returning to Congress next year, but perhaps he figured he wasn’t coming back anyway. (via HA reader Chip H)
Update IV: Bad news for ObamaCare opponents. Marcy Kaptur, one of Stupak’s bloc of pro-life holdouts, announced that she’s voting yes:
In a big step forward for House Dems, Rep Marcy Kaptur of Ohio, one around a half dozen Stupak holdouts, just confirmed to a local TV station that she’s voting Yes on the Senate bill.
Kaptur made the announcement on WTGV-TV, the ABC affiliate in Toledo, at around 9:50 AM.
The interview is not yet online but I confirmed Kaptur’s quotes with WTGV investigative reporter Zack Ottenstein.
“Yes I will,” Kaptur said, when asked if she’d be supporting the Senate bill. Asked why, she continued:
“We received assurances last night from the administration and Secretary Sebelius that they will work with us to ensure existing law is maintained.”
If she’s the only one to defect, it could still stop Pelosi from getting the votes, but I’d guess that this shows Pelosi has successfully called in her chits.
Update V: Bart Stupak says he’s still trying to cut a deal:
Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.) said Sunday morning that he is close to striking a deal with the Obama administration on abortion provisions.
“We are close to getting something done,” Stupak said in an interview with MSNBC. …
The possible deal would focus on an executive order that would specify there would be no public funding for abortions in the healthcare bill.
“We’re close but we’re not there yet,” Stupak said.
Democratic leaders said Sunday they have the votes on healthcare reform, but Stupak said until there is a deal struck, they don’t have the 216 votes they need.
Stupak said “there were eight of us” in the negotiating room, all of them no votes.
Stupak said Saturday that there were “at least six” of his original dozen that were going to oppose the health bill. He said that he was “going to think about” what would need to be included in an executive order to convince him that no federal dollars would go toward funding abortion. Further, Stupak said that he had not talked to the White House about such an executive order.
Sounds like Stupak is sensing defeat and looking for whatever he can get on the way out.
Update VI: Or maybe not; looks like a rumored Stupak presser has been put off … again.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 … 3 4 5 6 Next »
.
Or not :-)
Dasher on March 21, 2010 at 12:21 PM
it is not too late !!!!!! tihs must lead the news today – obama’s deficit savings LIE!!!!!!!!!!!!
UPDATE: Former CBO Director: Obamacare Deficit will be $562 Billion over 10 years http://bit.ly/bO22yh
UPDATE: Former Congressional Budget Office Director Douglas Holtz-Eakin, director of the Congressional Budget Office from 2003 to 2005, confirms CentristNet’s claims last night in his NYT column outlining the dodges and gimmicks included by the Democrats to obtain the explicitly false claim of $138 billion in paper deficit “savings” and concluding that Obamacare will actually result in over a half a trillion of increased deficit spending over the next 10 years
Anti-Harkonnen Freedom Fighter on March 21, 2010 at 12:21 PM
Hell, they’re just learning from Allah.
Ryan Anthony on March 21, 2010 at 12:21 PM
Glenn Beck said last week that George Washington lost every battle until they crossed the Delaware.
If this bill does pass and I am praying and hoping with all that I have that it will not. Let us make this our Delaware.
We have not yet begun to fight.
I am a great great great great granddaughter of an amazing man who fought at the battle of Bunker Hill. These people have no idea who we the American people really are.
Willow on March 21, 2010 at 12:21 PM
More like 30 to 40 years. We got the current constitution because the Articles of Confederation failed. Runaway debt, runaway inflation, institutional stagnation and corruption, and tyrannical regulation can all be solved by repudiating the government–that’s why revolutions happen so frequently outside the US. Our political leaders kept reminding themselves of that for 225 years, and that’s why it hasn’t recurred here.
The panic and hysteria by the authors of this blog this past week is just sickening. Deliberate, cold-blooded defeatism. What could tigerlily have said to get the boot?
Chris_Balsz on March 21, 2010 at 12:21 PM
I agree.
It ain’t over til the votes are counted and The Botox lady sings or croons.
Chaz706 on March 21, 2010 at 12:22 PM
Chaz706 on March 21, 2010 at 12:22 PM
Or cries.
Ryan Anthony on March 21, 2010 at 12:23 PM
I may not be able to eat much today. This final nail in our fiscal coffin let alone it’s Constitutional disqualification yet it’s being rammed (literally) through anyways by liberal ideologues…. there’s only so much a citizen.. and a nation.. can take.
Yakko77 on March 21, 2010 at 12:24 PM
tigerlily banned? What the hell for? Good Lord.
darwin on March 21, 2010 at 12:24 PM
Perhaps you don’t understand me. I know you’re not all New York Jews, but there’s a whole ton of them down there. They are pretty much like the blacks in the regard that they’ll follow a liberal right off a cliff and blame it on George W. Bush as they fall.
Thank God I’m a regular American, there.
You can see how New York is a political wasteland. And when New York has become utterly unlivable, they come here and destroy our system with their policies. And that’s New Yorkers in general, not just the Jews. I mean, just look at our friend Ernesto.
Lanceman on March 21, 2010 at 12:24 PM
TO ALL YOU FREAKING EEYORES…
WE WILL NOT GO QUIETLY INTO THE NIGHT…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NZZvtQtdbzM&feature=related
lovingmyUSA on March 21, 2010 at 12:24 PM
Stupy’s angle is he need Stimulus dollars that will be arriving in Obamacare districts by the truckload, this summer.
They want him to run for House re-election, he wants to run for Governor.
I’ve explained for a few days now that he was always looking for a way to get cover for his vote and was never really “holding out” but “forced out” by Waxman. He F’d up with the Progressives by being so talkative to the MSM. When Bocceiri split, he was cooked.
It’s not an accident he last appearances have been on MSNBC and no longer FNC.
Kaptur was the real target since Nancy’s all-female House meeting.
budfox on March 21, 2010 at 12:24 PM
Call Stupak to complain now.
maverick muse on March 21, 2010 at 12:25 PM
Or transforms into whatever hideous monster we all know is hiding beneath the botox.
laurakbarr on March 21, 2010 at 12:25 PM
Send faxes to DC :
https://secure.conservativedonations.com/rm_obamacare/?a=3954
Dasher on March 21, 2010 at 12:26 PM
Oh, noes! It gets worse!?
RedWinged Blackbird on March 21, 2010 at 12:28 PM
And I’ll tell you what. If Wasserman-Schultz somehow loses, I’ll come down there and buy you a big steak dinner.
Or I’ll take you to the biggest duck filled pond you’ve seen.
I mean, what the hell? I like ducks, too.:)
Lanceman on March 21, 2010 at 12:28 PM
I like this video too.
It’s THEY LIVE with Obama spliced into it.
portlandon on March 21, 2010 at 12:29 PM
The “This thing is going to pass votes” started at the top, so you can’t expect others not to do so. This site has been saying things are dead for far too long. This place needs more realistic prognostication.
tomas on March 21, 2010 at 12:29 PM
I read what I wrote – type is cold, I am not scolding.
They interviewed a lady yesterday at the Tea Party at the Capitol. She said paraphrasing: We have just begun, we have just started, we aren’t going anywhere. That’s the truth the more they go against the will of the people, the more the push back grows. This is like a snowball growing, and picking up speed.
Dr Evil on March 21, 2010 at 12:29 PM
Looks like this thing will pass, although of course there are no guarantees. Undoubtably when it does, virtually everyone here will flip out and post about how America is dead and an armed uprising is imminent etc etc.
Before you guys type that stuff up, I hope you think rationally, and consider the following questions.
1) What do you not like about this bill? Does your fear accord with the reality of the bill?
2) Do you think the healthcare status quo is better? Do you know what the status quo is?
3) Do you fear a government take-over of health care? First, does this bill do that? Second, what does the bill actually do? Finally, should private insurance companies inherently be trusted more than the government with matters concerning your health? Would you at least agree they ought to be regulated? If so, how?
4) If you don’t like this bill, what do you think is a better solution? Visualize that solution. Now, be honest, and ask yourself if your ‘fix’ in any way 1) affects healthcare coverage for coveraged or uncovered Americans, 2) brings costs down and 3) retains feasibility in the public-private mesh that defines U.S. healthcare today.
5) After reviewing these questions, compare and contrast today’s (admittedly imperfect) partisan positions on healthcare. Now grade each party. Who fares better?
6) After giving out the grades, where do you stand in the debate? Do you support the proposal? Why/Why not? And do you think a better proposal will present itself that doesn’t carry the same or bigger flaws?
crr6 on March 21, 2010 at 12:29 PM
Yeah, underneath all those wrinkles and sagging flesh is the love child of Josef Stalin and Woodrow Wilson.
Holger on March 21, 2010 at 12:30 PM
All this business of “Joe Shmoe switching to yea,” and “Joe Shmoe switching back to nay,” and “No — no –wait a minute — Joe’s back to yea…” is such a collasal load of bullsh!it. If these imbeciles are really that fickle, or their votes can be swayed back and forth like a f#$%ing ping pong ball by all these last minute deals and “changes to wording”, then anything they do or any promise they make isn’t worth two cents, and we must make absolutely certain that, in November, they personally contribute to raising the unemployment rate.
Dopenstrange on March 21, 2010 at 12:30 PM
Tried to e-mail Stupak and it rejected me. I didn’t live in his state.Wow, I guess he’s not accountable to the other 49 states?
sandee on March 21, 2010 at 12:31 PM
What an Executive can order one minute, he can revoke the next.
Stupak should know better than trust an Executive Order from anything. Especially an Executive who gives promises with an expiration date.
ajacksonian on March 21, 2010 at 12:31 PM
You know where we stand and you know our rationale. The question is … why do you want the government to run health care through an insurance proxy?
darwin on March 21, 2010 at 12:32 PM
Saw that movie for the first time when I lived in Portland.
Great movie.
Lanceman on March 21, 2010 at 12:33 PM
thank you HA. i can’t bear to see or hear on TV, but i can still bear to read what you write.
as a Republican from 5th CD Va, I promise I will work hard to rid my district, my Commonwealth & my country of Tom Perriello “if you don’t stop us, we’ll keep stealing”.
kelley in virginia on March 21, 2010 at 12:34 PM
most people still think we don’t have a plan.
tomas on March 21, 2010 at 12:34 PM
My God, Woman–I’ll gladly stand at your side!
lovingmyUSA on March 21, 2010 at 12:34 PM
What is the rationale of a dedicated lefty who posts constantly on a conservative blog?
d1carter on March 21, 2010 at 12:35 PM
I just can’t understand why these Congressman would fall on their swords for Obama. Do they pay attention to the polls at all? Obama is tanking in every one. If this passes he will plummet even farther. Why would they do this?
sandee on March 21, 2010 at 12:35 PM
Why would you attempt to reason with it?
Lanceman on March 21, 2010 at 12:35 PM
UPDATE: Former CBO Director: Obamacare Deficit will be $562 Billion over 10 years http://bit.ly/bO22yh
This is the sad truth of the Obamacare package that is due to be voted on by the House of Representatives just a few hours from now. Democrats continued to make the explicitly false claim that Obamacare will be a “historic” deficit reduction package on all the Sunday shows, and the establishment media continued to second their false claims and refuse to even mention any of the obvious gimmicks and dodges used to create the false paper deficit savings reported by the CBO last week. Should Obamacare pass, the intentional fraud engaged in by President Obama and Democrats regarding the deficit “savings” issue will be seen as one of the most egregious examples of explicit misrepresentations made by federal officials, and sanctioned by the American media, in the history of this country.
Anti-Harkonnen Freedom Fighter on March 21, 2010 at 12:35 PM
crr6 is one of them.
darwin on March 21, 2010 at 12:35 PM
If this POS passes, there is a good chance it may be tied up in court, and then found unconstitutional – at least the mandate to buy insurance. Reliance on the commerce clause will not help.
runner on March 21, 2010 at 12:35 PM
the lasting impression that Stupak is giving is that he might cave.
even if he has the libby-est/progressive district in America, they can’t fault him for saying he wants to protect a fetus. even pro-choice proponents have to back down when you show babies in the womb.
but if he caves on his “pro-life” principles, people will just assume he is a liar like the rest of ‘em in Congress.
kelley in virginia on March 21, 2010 at 12:36 PM
That is what I am amazed about. Paul Ryan’s plan is solid but Democrats have gotten roughly half the populace to think it doesn’t exist and Republicans are proposing the Republic does nothing.
All we are proposing is that we don’t screw everyone over with a Socialized medicine scheme.
This entire Healthcare Putsch is a fraud in every respect.
Holger on March 21, 2010 at 12:36 PM
I don’t know … time to pull out my Jack Daniels auto-injector I guess.
darwin on March 21, 2010 at 12:36 PM
Find a business in his district and use that address. That’s worked for me before.
gophergirl on March 21, 2010 at 12:37 PM
Actually the war turned when the Over Mountain Men (Hillbillies) marched to King’s Mountain and took on Ferguson and his troops. It didn’t end well for Ferguson ( he fell down the mountain ended up kissing dirt;) My 6th Great Grandfather Zachariah Isbell fought at Kings Mountain. My folks have been fighting for this country before it was a country.
Dr Evil on March 21, 2010 at 12:37 PM
Ruth Cris here we come!
We’ve got ducks up the ying-yang here. Muscovys are not good eating.
katy the mean old lady on March 21, 2010 at 12:37 PM
Kelley–we went to his office yesterday. The staff locked us out. We walked up there after visiting many other offices and about 5-7 other folks were standing there saying that they just locked the door a few minutes prior. We knocked on the door, etc. to no avail. Took some pictures of his “Welcome, Please come in” delicious irony for the moment, as well as the “Sic Semper Tyrannis” on the VA flag right there. How appropos.
I plan on emailing Tom and telling him that I traveled all the way up there to tie his hands but the staff locked me out. Will he update his statement to “You need to both kick down the door and then tie our hands, to keep us from stealing.”
ted c on March 21, 2010 at 12:38 PM
Kelley, I agree with you. I said earlier if he votes yes it doesn’t matter what number he is he will be the one held accountable for the final vote.
sandee on March 21, 2010 at 12:38 PM
This pretty much sums it up:
What is the rationale of a dedicated lefty who posts constantly on a conservative blog?
d1carter on March 21, 2010 at 12:35 PM
Lanceman on March 21, 2010 at 12:38 PM
Based on the “firms”, isn’t it game over for Queen Nancy if Stupak and company hold firm?
The Sunday morning shows were awesome…Rove took apart Ploffe and Ryan destroyed Wasserman-Schultz with basic math. Paul Ryan needs to be on the short list for 2012, his cool, calm expertise shown this morning and in the made-for-TV event with PBO is so needed to contrast with Obama empty rhetoric. The Dems are either fooling themselves or willfully ignorant if they believe that the electorate is not engaged/educated in the process of passing this bill…
Tony253 on March 21, 2010 at 12:38 PM
crr6 on March 21, 2010 at 12:29 PM
I’ll grade you instead. F
Without a doubt you are the most condescending POS here.
Visualize this: Just because you do not agree with posters here does not mean folks do not have a good faith, rational basis for their views – views that are not based on ‘fear.’ We are not high school students; we are capable of critical thought.
Firefly_76 on March 21, 2010 at 12:38 PM
sandee: i’ve wondered why these people are voting YES when they must know they will face a horrible re-election fight. is there that much SOROS money that nancy can give away to shore up these Dems from swing districts?
nancy pelosi, Tim Kaine & Bambi will be sending Organizing for America (SEIU) down to campaign for my congressman, Perriello.
kelley in virginia on March 21, 2010 at 12:39 PM
For what it’s worth:
Rep Todd Tiahrt: “Dems process appears to violate House rules by accepting a revenue bill that whose origin isnt the House.”
gatorfanatic on March 21, 2010 at 12:39 PM
crr6…..Are you kidding me? Ask yourself? Please tell me that you read in the last 72hrs this entire 2000+ page bill, well let me answer that NO you have not, therefore why pose these questions! Nice try though
justonevictory on March 21, 2010 at 12:39 PM
I sense a fracture in the middle of the Dems…there’s a weak link, a coalition of frightened kittens that’ll scatter like cockroaches now that their feet are going to be held to the fire.
ted c on March 21, 2010 at 12:39 PM
Why do you post that list as if those issues have not been discussed in detail over the past year, right here on this very site?
The US does not need another entitlement program. Period. You want to talk other types of fixes? Fine, but entitlements need to be off the table.
venividivici on March 21, 2010 at 12:40 PM
Ferguson was shot, and was dragged by his horse to the Rebel side. There he was shot full of holes and the Patriots desecrated his body in creative ways (I’m all a fan of desecration of your enemies if it is creative) before burying it.
Holger on March 21, 2010 at 12:40 PM
One of those damn things was blocking my path yesterday. Had to get outta my truck and run it off. They remind me of liberals. Butt-ugly and always stealing the cat food.
Lanceman on March 21, 2010 at 12:41 PM
Come join us and see…
Hot Air Rendezvous Point(on facebook, sometimes my linkds don’t work)
http://www.facebook.com/?sk=messages&tid=1361604290496#!/group.php?gid=314670616874&ref=ts
lovingmyUSA on March 21, 2010 at 12:41 PM
ted c: i know you want to run a TEA party/Republican against Perriello. and though I want to run Robert Hurt, we will get together the day after the primary & work like hell for whomever is the nominee. Perriello has become my personal “worst person in the world”
kelley in virginia on March 21, 2010 at 12:42 PM
.
Because they all have one thing in common. They are all liberals = progressives = socialists = fill in the blank
Dasher on March 21, 2010 at 12:42 PM
Crr6, and furthermore I think you forgot to put in your little screed a question about how we feel about the IRS being in charge of enforcing this disaster.You like that ?
sandee on March 21, 2010 at 12:42 PM
I’ll go one step further. In a thought experiment, imagine two countries. One follows the ObamaCare centralized planning plan and the other follows the various GOP-proposed market-oriented plans (after reconciling them to iron out the contradictory proposals). Over the next 50-100 years, which one will be in the better fiscal position?
ObamaCare is like a start-up car company adopting the GM business model. It won’t work.
venividivici on March 21, 2010 at 12:44 PM
Dasher, I know the thrill of their socialist agenda coming true is tempting, but first and foremost they are politicians. They want the power. Voting for this is not going to help keep them in their cozy little perk filled offices. I should think that would trump the other.
sandee on March 21, 2010 at 12:45 PM
Already there are only 142 federal employees per US citizen, after this the ratio will shrink some more.
Dasher on March 21, 2010 at 12:45 PM
Not only look at it from the perspective of fiscal matters, but the matter of Liberty.
Holger on March 21, 2010 at 12:45 PM
Of course it does. It’s a good little comrade. It’s favorite is the Two Minutes’ Hate. Always yells the loudest at Goldstein.
Lanceman on March 21, 2010 at 12:45 PM
Democrats have pushed back the final vote deadline to 9pm.
Enoxo on March 21, 2010 at 12:46 PM
They do not have this in the bag.
Holger on March 21, 2010 at 12:47 PM
Seriously? Is there a link?
reginaldL on March 21, 2010 at 12:47 PM
.
Normally I would agree with you, but I think the idea of so much control over our lives is more important to them than that control being done by themselves.
.
They are falling on the sword for the “greater good” which is very bad for America.
Dasher on March 21, 2010 at 12:48 PM
No! You don’t say! Can I get a ‘week from next Tuesday’? ;)
Lanceman on March 21, 2010 at 12:48 PM
Or don’t consider the questions, whatevs. But don’t expect anyone to take you seriously.
Carry on with the hysterical apocalyptic screeds…
crr6 on March 21, 2010 at 12:49 PM
Battle Of King’s Mountain
One seasoned militiaman took aim with his rifle and shot Ferguson out of his saddle. Ferguson’s foot caught in the stirrup, and as his horse dragged the body of the hated British officer around the mountain top, at least six other Patriots fired into the body. Many more claimed to have done so.
This is a great article From the Rock Hill Herald “Ferguson was Dead Right about Militias, Rifles, and The Mountain Men”
I descend from Zachariah Isbell Sr’s daughter Lovica Isbell, she married John Carr he fought in the regular Continental Army during the Rev War.
Dr Evil on March 21, 2010 at 12:51 PM
Fair point and I agree.
The lack of love of liberty among some Americans is truly troubling. It’s as if the era of world history when liberty was not the guiding principle of society was some sort of golden age. You know, the era from the collapse of the Roman Republic to the founding of America. Yeah, some “golden age”.
These people are historical regressives dressed up in pretty rhetoric about fairness and compassion. I spit on all of them.
venividivici on March 21, 2010 at 12:51 PM
Go play with yourself and shut the hell up. Thanks!
TXMomof3 on March 21, 2010 at 12:52 PM
crr6, I’m so flattered… you used my word screed.Thanks to your beloved socialist congresswinnies we will all be screwed.
sandee on March 21, 2010 at 12:54 PM
1) The whole premis of the bill is unconstitutional. Where in the constitution does it say the feds can FORCE a citizen to purchase something?
2) It is about liberty and keeping government from taking over 1/6 of the economy
3) Where has ANY program come in under the cost projections in history? I read somewhere that medicare came in 10 times higher 10 years after the fact.
4) Assuming someone accepts that this bill is constitutional, what about the 10th amendment, where the feds are pushing tremendous cost burdens onto the states by expanding medicare, and not funding those mandates? Most states are already bankrupt.
5) Assuming you buy the premis that this bill is good for the country, how can ANYONE rationally believe the insurance premiums will not go up? By mandating pre-existing conditions acceptance, this bill is like allowing a really bad driver who just totalled their car and killed 18 people in the car they also hit to get insurance AFTER the fact and force the insurance company to replace both cars and payoff the families of the victims of that bad driver. Where does this economincally make sense? What insurance company is going to still be in business a few years after this lunacy goes into effect?
6) How do you rationally believe that health care will not be RATIONED under this bill? They are trying to cover millions more, and a huge percentage of the doctors will quit the business before they can be replaced. Also, where is the money to build the extra clinics and hospitals? They are already working pretty mucy at capacity with the existing system.
7) 16,000 IRS agents to enforce the fines and penalties of tis bill? Hundreds of new panels and commissions are set up to implement this behemoth monstor. The bill ignores the ongoing cost to manage this new entitlement, BILLIONS per year.
8) You know as well as I do that the progressives are going to shop judges and find the most liberal lefty judge to force the government to also cover every illegal in the USA with this bill.
9) There will be death panels. They can’t cut 500 BILLION from medicare for the elderly to cover everyone else instead without rationing care and deciding if Grandma or Grandpa can get that bypass, or decide that grammy and grampy have lived long enough and need to just die already.
Need I go on?
karenhasfreedom on March 21, 2010 at 12:55 PM
Even the Washington Post said in an op-ed that the individual mandate was an unprecedented legislative proposal based on a tendentious reading of the Constitution.
Are they just being apocalyptic, too?
So, f u and your dismissive rhetoric.
venividivici on March 21, 2010 at 12:56 PM
That will be better than be treated “like a pinata” when you come back to your district if you vote yes.
chemman on March 21, 2010 at 12:56 PM
If he votes yes, then he has just been doing a kabuki dance all along.
MB4 on March 21, 2010 at 12:57 PM
Neofeudalists is a good summation of what they infact are.
Holger on March 21, 2010 at 12:58 PM
Sanchez is back and will be voting. Last I heard, she was a yes. FDL has her as a maybe, NYT has her as a yes.
FDL just switched Boucher from No to Undecided. Boucher strays from the party very rarely, and it’s usually just on guns. My hunch is Boucher is a yes. He was a no a few days ago, and now all of a sudden he’s “reviewing the bill.” Come on.
Proud Rino on March 21, 2010 at 12:58 PM
I asked you a question … but that’s ok, don’t answer it. You have our permission to continue wallowing in your ignorance.
darwin on March 21, 2010 at 12:59 PM
Funny how none of them ever think they’ll be the serfs though…
Firefly_76 on March 21, 2010 at 12:59 PM
We’re winning!
gophergirl on March 21, 2010 at 12:59 PM
Agreed MB4. He’s got to live with his vote if he votes yes.
yoda on March 21, 2010 at 12:59 PM
Stupak is now a yes… it’s going to pass now…
ninjapirate on March 21, 2010 at 12:59 PM
You should not have wasted the electrons. He is a true believer that knows all this and it makes no difference to him or her or it.
chemman on March 21, 2010 at 1:00 PM
On a down day, you gave me a really good laugh here. We must answer your silly little questions or else no one will take us “seriously”?
Now that’s funny…I’m still laughing.
Grace_is_sufficient on March 21, 2010 at 1:00 PM
Dang Stupak caved? That explains the defections above. He will pay.
sandee on March 21, 2010 at 1:00 PM
Or at least MSNBC is reporting that Stupak is a yes…
ninjapirate on March 21, 2010 at 1:01 PM
Pretty much.
venividivici on March 21, 2010 at 1:01 PM
Actually, crr6′s MO is she’ll hang around if she thinks she’s making a point, but runs when she’s cornered.
darwin on March 21, 2010 at 1:01 PM
Why has National Right to Life not issued a decisive statement like the Bishops? Where is there stand on LIFE?
texasconserv on March 21, 2010 at 1:01 PM
If you haven’t started drinking by now…
lovingmyUSA on March 21, 2010 at 1:02 PM
If they could think, I’d bet most ants wouldn’t think they’d be “workers”, either.
venividivici on March 21, 2010 at 1:02 PM
Pat Goodell was on Fox News and he said the Democrats are knowingly committing a political “Jonestown” – drinking the kool-aid even though they know they will lose in November. He also said that Obama and Pelosi don’t plan on her being Speaker next year, and they are willing to risk that.
If that is all true, expect a rough and bumpy summer!
ladyingray on March 21, 2010 at 1:02 PM
The fact that you do not know the answers to those questions reveals everything anyone needs to know about you.
csdeven on March 21, 2010 at 1:02 PM
Link?
Enoxo on March 21, 2010 at 1:02 PM
Didn’t Stupak notice Obama’s first executive order was to Fund abortions overseas? And that Executive orders are whim, not law.
batterup on March 21, 2010 at 1:02 PM
They won’t. Those who institute a system will be able to dictate their place in that system. They will be exempt from it all, as you saw with them defeating the idea of them having their healthcare through the system they set up.
How many times in Feudal times did Feudal Lords slip and slide till they were a member of the Peasantry? Exactly Zero. How many times did the Social Order get reversed? Exactly Zero. How many times did the Peasants attempt to overthrow the Aristocracy? Exactly Zero.
Holger on March 21, 2010 at 1:03 PM
C-Span and the bell is ringing.
AC/DC
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Kjh9lQXLWk
yoda on March 21, 2010 at 1:03 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 … 3 4 5 6 Next »