Do they have the votes? Update: Nye a nay; Update: Stupak Dozen member caves; Update: Stupak says a deal is close
posted at 10:08 am on March 21, 2010 by Ed Morrissey
It’s getting harder to tell whether Democrats themselves know what’s happening any more. CNN quotes two leading House Democrats saying two different things this morning in its report on the ObamaCare push on the Hill:
Democrats have the 216 votes needed to pass health care reform legislation in the House on Sunday, the chairman of the House Democratic Caucus told CNN.
“This is a historic day and we are happy warriors,” Rep. John Larson, D- Connecticut, told CNN’s “State of the Union.” He added, “We’ve got the votes.”
But the chief deputy whip in the House, Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Florida, cautioned, “We don’t have a hard 216 right now.” Schultz made the statement to “Fox News Sunday” just as Larson was speaking to CNN.
Wasserman Schultz added, “I firmly believe we will have 216.”
Meanwhile, not only does it look like liberal Loretta Sanchez is a no, it also looks like she’s MIA:
As their whip efforts narrow to just a handful of Members, House Democratic leaders are facing an unlikely problem vote: Rep. Loretta Sanchez (D-Calif.).
Sanchez was nowhere to be found on Saturday — she was in Florida on a fundraising jaunt, two Democratic sources said — and while leaders expected her to return for the Sunday vote on final passage, they weren’t assured. What’s more, leaders now list the Orange County Democrat as a “no” vote.
Sanchez’s office did not return a request for comment Saturday evening. She cast her last vote shortly after 6 p.m. Friday and missed all seven recorded votes on Saturday, a review of the record shows.
Democratic hand-wringing about her status — geographically and intentionally — underlines just how tight the margin has become for leaders trying to zero in on 216 votes as the clock ticks down to their appointed deadline. Leaders are still hunting for a winning coalition of votes — and still struggling for a breakthrough abortion fix that will convert three or four holdouts angling for tougher protections against public funding of the procedure.
She may not be the only Democrat to sneak out of DC today, either. Gene Taylor, a Mississippi Democrat voting against the bill, warned his fellow no-voting colleagues to get the hell out of Dodge after casting the vote:
A Democrat who has long committed to opposing healthcare reform legislation has advised his fellow defectors that they should vote no early on Sunday and then immediately leave the House chamber.
Otherwise, Rep. Gene Taylor (D-Miss.) told The Hill, they will be treated “like a piñata.” …
The tactics of House leaders during what is billed as a 15-minute vote are important. It is likely that some firm no votes on the Democratic side will vote right away while others, at the request of House leaders, will wait to register their no until the tally reaches the magic number of 216. Once it does, politically vulnerable Democrats will likely cast their no votes.
But if getting to 216 is a problem, Democratic leaders may lean on these members to change their minds.
That doesn’t sound like a caucus confident of today’s events. I’ll add more updates as the day moves along.
Update: Here’s the schedule for today, via Daniel Foster and the Boss Emeritus:
2 p.m.: The House will debate for one hour the rules of debate for the reconciliation bill and the Senate bill.
3 p.m.: The House will vote to end debate and vote on the rules of the debate.
3:15 p.m.: The House will debate the reconciliation package for two hours.
5:15 p.m.: The House will vote on the reconciliation package.
5:30 p.m.: The House will debate for 15 minutes on a Republican substitute and then vote on the substitute.
6 p.m.: The House will vote on the final reconciliation package.
6:15 p.m.: If the reconciliation bill passes, the House will immediately vote on the Senate bill, without debate.
Expect these times to slide. As the debate moves forward and as votes get hard to find, the House may find themselves into the long hours of the night before getting to the end.
Update II: Rep. Glenn Nye (D-VA) is a nay:
Citing potential problems for TRICARE recipients, the cost of the bill, and cuts to children’s hospitals, Congressman Glenn Nye announced this evening that he will vote against adopting the health care proposal under consideration in the House of Representatives.
“Over the past year, I have spoken with countless small business owners, families, medical professionals, and average citizens across Virginia’s 2nd District, and it became very clear that this bill was not the right solution for Virginia’s health care challenges,” said Congressman Nye. “There were many strong points in this bill that I would have been happy to support individually, but the package as a whole had serious problems.”
The original version of legislation in the House had specifically exempted TRICARE from being affected. However, when the final bill language was released on Thursday afternoon, it was revealed that neither the Senate bill nor the reconciliation package contained an exemption for TRICARE.
“Our military families need to be able to count on their health care benefits, and I am not willing to risk negative consequences for our military personnel and their families, particularly at a time when our troops are serving overseas in harm’s way,” said Nye.
Update III: Chris Carney (D-PA) is a yes:
I am voting for this legislation because all Americans should have the same insurance choices enjoyed by members of Congress and their families. If it’s good enough for members of Congress, it is good enough for the people they represent.
Carney represents PA-10, becoming in 2006 the first Democrat to represent that district in 45 years. He won with just 52.9% of the vote in 2008, in a district that John McCain won by nine points. My guess is that Carney won’t be returning to Congress next year, but perhaps he figured he wasn’t coming back anyway. (via HA reader Chip H)
Update IV: Bad news for ObamaCare opponents. Marcy Kaptur, one of Stupak’s bloc of pro-life holdouts, announced that she’s voting yes:
In a big step forward for House Dems, Rep Marcy Kaptur of Ohio, one around a half dozen Stupak holdouts, just confirmed to a local TV station that she’s voting Yes on the Senate bill.
Kaptur made the announcement on WTGV-TV, the ABC affiliate in Toledo, at around 9:50 AM.
The interview is not yet online but I confirmed Kaptur’s quotes with WTGV investigative reporter Zack Ottenstein.
“Yes I will,” Kaptur said, when asked if she’d be supporting the Senate bill. Asked why, she continued:
“We received assurances last night from the administration and Secretary Sebelius that they will work with us to ensure existing law is maintained.”
If she’s the only one to defect, it could still stop Pelosi from getting the votes, but I’d guess that this shows Pelosi has successfully called in her chits.
Update V: Bart Stupak says he’s still trying to cut a deal:
Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.) said Sunday morning that he is close to striking a deal with the Obama administration on abortion provisions.
“We are close to getting something done,” Stupak said in an interview with MSNBC. …
The possible deal would focus on an executive order that would specify there would be no public funding for abortions in the healthcare bill.
“We’re close but we’re not there yet,” Stupak said.
Democratic leaders said Sunday they have the votes on healthcare reform, but Stupak said until there is a deal struck, they don’t have the 216 votes they need.
Stupak said “there were eight of us” in the negotiating room, all of them no votes.
Stupak said Saturday that there were “at least six” of his original dozen that were going to oppose the health bill. He said that he was “going to think about” what would need to be included in an executive order to convince him that no federal dollars would go toward funding abortion. Further, Stupak said that he had not talked to the White House about such an executive order.
Sounds like Stupak is sensing defeat and looking for whatever he can get on the way out.
Update VI: Or maybe not; looks like a rumored Stupak presser has been put off … again.










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 … 4 5 6
I used each represenative’s local address as my address to input into their system so that it would not reject my email. Then at the end of my email, I put my correct address so they would know the truth.
texasconserv on March 21, 2010 at 1:05 PM
I should call my doctor and see if he’s been committed yet. Him and everyone at the practice he’s with is so viscerally angered that the government dares impose itself yet again on the American people that he’s seriously thinking of quitting. He works long hours and is stressed enough as it is without the constant threat of a tryannical government breathing down your neck.
darwin on March 21, 2010 at 1:05 PM
Oh, every Judas once loved a Jesus
But oh betrayal will seize us
You may end up in hell
If your principles you sell
Caught in the middle
Of a dangerous riddle
There may come a day when you trade your soul away!
PercyB on March 21, 2010 at 1:06 PM
Even if this thing passes, it’s not a done deal. There will be legal challenges. Also if the Congress changes hands like I think it will there are ways to slow it down or downright stop it by refusing funding. Basically we need to win Congress. The Republicans have shown some backbone and the American public doesn’t want this. We will prevail.
sandee on March 21, 2010 at 1:06 PM
NBC says Stupak’s a yes.
Proud Rino on March 21, 2010 at 1:06 PM
crruption6: “The dilemma of the postmodern narcissist is thus an unqualified belief in his or her own righteousness and moral obligation to judge the past; that is simultaneously combined with an aggressive ignorance about it.”
Your childish solipsism is only trumped by your total ignorance of history, and the ability to understand it. But, it comes as no surprise that liberalism breeds the rationalization that thrives on government dependence, rather than individual liberties. The very fact that you do not see the difference, is disheartening….and a sad reflection of your upbringing/brainwashing.
Rovin on March 21, 2010 at 1:06 PM
Because crr6 has the attention span of a 2 year old? Just a guess…
Eren on March 21, 2010 at 1:06 PM
I had a little bit last night. After you beat me up.
Lanceman on March 21, 2010 at 1:06 PM
If Stupak caved, why the later vote time? It makes sense that he would dodge the presser though. Michiganders are NOT going to be happy with him.
Grace_is_sufficient on March 21, 2010 at 1:07 PM
Go back into your swamp–the flies are missing you.
lovingmyUSA on March 21, 2010 at 1:07 PM
Okay, let me spin it on you: how often, in a year, do you see a specialist? How many different procedures do you have on a yearly (or, heck, 3-month period)? And, no, I’m not counting dentist visits and a possible yearly physical.
How many reoccurances of cancer have you suffered? How many catscans? Endocopies? Colonoscopies? Gallum scans, MRCPs?
I’m guessing, the answer is a whopping 0. And, with that, not a clue about what’s at stake here.
Let the people who have actual medical issues–those that depend on regular medicine, those that depend on the greatest health system in the world, those that depends a system that works more like a doctor-patient friend-friend relationship rather than pulling a ticket and waiting at the DMV.
CatsGodot on March 21, 2010 at 1:08 PM
Holger on March 21, 2010 at 1:03 PM
True, but I’m talking about the drones that support the agenda. Perhaps crr6 and her ilk hope to be members of the “outer party”; but they’ll never join the inner party set – not enough space. So they’ll suffer also.
Firefly_76 on March 21, 2010 at 1:08 PM
I think the point was more about the “useful idiots” like crr6.
They’re the ones who’s support will mean nothing in terms of health care access in the long run. You can’t have an “aristocracy” consisting of 52% of the population. It’s a contradiction in terms.
The real beneficiaries will be those who staff the agencies to administer this BS. Full job security and pensions, at taxpayer expense. If any benefits trickle down from there, great. If not, hey, it’s still full job security and pensions.
Ezra Pound was wrong about most things, but he was right when he called bureaucracy “the flail of Jehovah”.
venividivici on March 21, 2010 at 1:08 PM
The fact is tens of millions of Americans are capable of inspiration and encouragement. The fact is that this country, more than anywhere on earth, feels there are things we ought to do, easy or not.
It is one thing to build a successful juggernaut of a political machine, and mock my quixotic refusal to get on board. It’s another to stand in the burning wreckage and complain I didn’t flap my arms hard enough.
I regret the years of common cause and shared purpose which misled you to imagine you’re free to rebuke me for my dedication to principle. Go sneer at the Greens; they could have provided you with the margin of victory. Go do it! “You were sooooo smart; you thought you were teaching the GOP a lesson about its errors. I hope you’re happy!”
Chris_Balsz on March 21, 2010 at 1:09 PM
Yes, I know…was it good for you–it was for me…you didn’t stick around to make up…
lovingmyUSA on March 21, 2010 at 1:10 PM
I am not including here the folks who constantly come to HA or other right-wing blogs but there are three main reasons why we have reached this threshold and a point of no return. Yes, anyone could cite personalities, but I am going to stick to ideas to why we find ourselves at the edge of the abyss while Obama and his merry men and women are about to shove us into the abyss in a few hourss:
1)Voters on our side who insist on “purity” before casting their vote for a candidate; in other words they would rather stay home or vote 3rd party, as is their right to do, but what about the consequences? Joel Mowbray, right after the election in 2008 exploded several myths about Obama’s victory and found that what primarily contributed to his 7 point win was NOT a wave of black or young voters coming out to vote but in his words, “Conservatives voters provided the margin of victory for Barack Obama; Obama picked up 1/3 more conservative votes than Kerry, 1/5 of Bush 2004 voters (conservative independents, Security Moms, and Roman Catholics) went to Obama and millions of conservatives simply sat out the election or voted 3rd party.
2)The Far Left has been planning this day for at least 80 years, but I would say for at least 40 years in earnest (from the Vietnam War protest days)employing the Alinsky playbook to insidiously gain more and more influence and power in the federal government. The passing of the Community Reinvestment Act in 1977 and future amendments basically compromised sound business practices, forced a misallocation of resources due to government demands, and finally caused the financial meltdown in Sept 2008 that threw the election to Obama. But the gradual loss of confidence in the free enterprise system among the American people, highlighted by the CRA, and the enduring calls from the MSM for more government control of business, commerce and industry has been orchestrated behind the scenes by powerful forces led by George Soros and the shadow party to destroy the underpinnings of American capitalism-the currency and the financial or banking system, which as you know they have now done. But this was not done overnight. Again today’s vote on Obamacare is a culmination of years of tireless effort and dedication on the part of the ideologues of the Far Left.
3) And the 3rd component of why we are where we are now is the ignorance of many conservative Americans regarding politics and ideology. Frankly they are naive, stupid, or unsophisticated to political motives or to political ideology. For them socialism, communism or Marxism is what they do “over there” in foreign countries. America is unique. So when anyone on our side calls Obama a socialist or a Marxist, they draw from their predisposition that Americans are not socialists to conclude that our side is fearmongering, for there is no way anyone vieing for the Presidency could be a socialist. That does not jibe with the oath of office he must take in defending the Constitution. And America because of a huge evangelical population is still backward in terms of embracing female leaders. Both Hillary Clinton and Sarah Palin have faced this misogyny and paid a price. And believe me-operatives and advisors of male candidates will subtly seek to exploit this advantage in their speeches and advertising although they are not so stupid to be overt about its use. And the MSM are also willing participants in this gender discrimination. And finally folks on our side who call themselves conservatives are so stupid according to polls to prefer to cast their vote for a RINO like Mitt Romney than a true conservative like Sarah Palin. Conservatives are their own worst enemy. Why are their so many RINO’s in Congress when conservatives make up about 2/3 to 70% of the Republican party?
technopeasant on March 21, 2010 at 1:11 PM
His constituents may not be happy but Planned Parenthood and the “Women’s Health” cliques will be tuning their machines to be ready for all that tax payer funded killing.
Annar on March 21, 2010 at 1:12 PM
Thanks for the link, Loving.
I’ll be there.
GrannyDee on March 21, 2010 at 1:13 PM
Tornado, cyclone, hurricane
Can batter the houses with the thunder and rain
Blizzards can blow, the waves hit the shore
Still the people recover and come back for more
Somehow the people fight back
Even when the future looks black
Life goes on and on
Christien on March 21, 2010 at 1:14 PM
When you’re not taught history, what do you expect?
When textbooks have an entire chapter on Barack Insane Obama and one paragraph on Reagan or W., what do you expect?
When a standardized school test contains the question “What is the party of the people?” and the answer is the Democrat (ic) party, what do you expect?
Cur6 and Ernesto are peas in a pod. They’re oh so worldly wise in twenty-something short years.
Ernesto does pose some good questions now and again, though.
The cur is just a ultra-liberal troll.
Lanceman on March 21, 2010 at 1:14 PM
Apparently the only “serious” answer is supporting obamacare.
Chris_Balsz on March 21, 2010 at 1:14 PM
I’m not understanding that either but yet this whole process has been one big head scratcher.
I just hope that all the lawyers are ready to go tomorrow if this passes.
gophergirl on March 21, 2010 at 1:15 PM
Useful idiots like crr6 will suffer the same fate as men like Trotsky or the rich who supported the Communists and then got thrown to the Gulags.
Holger on March 21, 2010 at 1:15 PM
While what you said is true the context in this country is different. We have more weapons than the the elites. We may not be able to overthrow the new Aristocracy but they won’t last long in it either.
chemman on March 21, 2010 at 1:16 PM
I just hope I’m there to see it! God does that self-righteous twat deserve a comeuppance.
venividivici on March 21, 2010 at 1:18 PM
That reminds me of my oft-used phrase: “Close the door, you’ll let all the flies out!”
Saw that on Hee Haw once.
The TxMoms had my back.
Lanceman on March 21, 2010 at 1:18 PM
I’m not surprised…Kaptur can be bought for a slice of bacon. I wonder what she really got for this? Maybe it was that kiss from Obama? And if she were truly pro-life she would never trust the word of partial-birth abortion Tiller-lover Sibelius.
Deanna on March 21, 2010 at 1:18 PM
I saw a woman with the Family Physician’s Medical Association on Fox News a few minutes ago, and she said there is a section of the bill to set up a panel to examine physician shortages, what types of physicians are needed, and how to get there.
In other words, this government panel will determine what specialty, if any, a med student can pursue.
ladyingray on March 21, 2010 at 1:20 PM
I guess its ok to talk about our militia history–in regards to the history of our country and the starting of the revolution that led to the birth of our country. I hope all of us remember their fighting spirit, and use it in the peaceful fight that we have ahead of us.
They think they have us folks, and we will show them that WE LIVE HERE–and we are from stronger stock then they can even imagine! I pledge to work hard for every congressperson who fights the good fight for us–and I will hold their feet to the fire…
lovingmyUSA on March 21, 2010 at 1:20 PM
I want to be a Gulag guard so I can give then the Nelson Munce treatment times infinity.
Holger on March 21, 2010 at 1:21 PM
Because they know that once this passes America will be changed forever. Even if they loose the next election, once this program is in place they will have the winning election issue for generations. Despite what a lot ultra-optimists say, entitlements are never revoked. That is why Bush with a majority in congress was not able to even start on minor changes to social security. All elections from now will be on health care and Democrats who are the masters of fear mongering, will know how to use it. This is just a continuation on the slippery road to the nanny state that we have been in for decades. Most people do not have a clue how transformative this law will be.
The Democrats are focused on the big picture. Unfortunately many of us are just looking at 2010.
neuquenguy on March 21, 2010 at 1:21 PM
Smart foreign commenters have noted this aspect of American politics for a long time and I agree. Ideology, especially when that ideology is of the incremental sort, is too abstract and most Americans are pragmatists.
Understanding the code words and strategies of socialism and how they’ve changed over time in response to shifting conditions is almost a full-time job and, unless you’re a socialist sympathizer, pretty much a thankless one as well, so it’s not surprising hardly anyone wants it.
venividivici on March 21, 2010 at 1:21 PM
“Oh, be quiet. You’ll wake up John Wayne.”
Lanceman on March 21, 2010 at 1:23 PM
I think I’d go with the classic “Why are you hitting yourself?” while forcing her to hit herself. An oldie, but a goodie.
venividivici on March 21, 2010 at 1:23 PM
I am not surprised. Obama did say that he will forgive your load after 10 years if you go into the public sector.
This is how they will fill in the gaps of supply for the increase in demand.
Electrongod on March 21, 2010 at 1:25 PM
I like the one where he says “Hey, butler, stop —butling yourself.”
“Oh, would that I could, sir.”
Lanceman on March 21, 2010 at 1:25 PM
It helps a great deal to have a background in Philosophy or some other field that deals with abstraction, concepts and meaning on a regular basis like I have.
Fellow Conservatives are notorious for not liking abstraction and murkiness in concepts and meaning. We like concrete things with meanings that can’t be doubted. We hate newspeak.
Holger on March 21, 2010 at 1:27 PM
Good Lord !
Pelagosi with that humongo gavel ?
Believes it’s a sure thang… dear God, no !
pambi on March 21, 2010 at 1:27 PM
She had a big job, you were spining so much…
lovingmyUSA on March 21, 2010 at 1:27 PM
Who was the hot chick in your old avatar, the black and white picture?
Lanceman on March 21, 2010 at 1:31 PM
So true my friend. I’ve written several pieces over the years on the sad state of our “public educational” system and the perils of the 80% liberal educators literally controlling our children’s mentality with out allowing the ability to challenge the curriculum.
Rovin on March 21, 2010 at 1:33 PM
That’s why many of us took matters into our own hands and jumped out of the system 20 years ago to HOMESCHOOL.
PrincipledPilgrim on March 21, 2010 at 1:35 PM
What a bunch of pompous _________________!!!!
Can’t speak, ban hammer!
ProudPalinFan on March 21, 2010 at 1:39 PM
lovingmyUSA on March 21, 2010 at 1:40 PM
And look how the liberal UNION educators are fighting to destroy this option. Good that you foresaw the perils.
Rovin on March 21, 2010 at 1:40 PM
A Braveheart weapon, or a rubber Playskool? No wonder she and her ilk walked in front of thousands of protesters.
ProudPalinFan on March 21, 2010 at 1:40 PM
Conservatives’ emphasis on pragmatism has helped the US develop itself into a global superpower on a material basis, but, yes, it has left them without a solid grounding in some of the more abstract concepts of political philosophy.
I was a Classics major, with a heavy dose of Plato and Aristotle and then worked my way through the history of Western philosophy from there, with an especial emphasis on German 19th and 20th century philosophy. Among its “theoreticians”, the US Left is basically watered-down and bastardized Hegelianism/vulgar Marxism. Lots of Left-leaning Congresscritters are just along for that ride and wouldn’t know Karl Marx from Groucho Marx, they just want the perks of office.
venividivici on March 21, 2010 at 1:41 PM
Protesters reportedly gave the house dems a hard time when arriving ?!? Those are reports on FNC .. ‘very vocal’ folks.
Awwwww
pambi on March 21, 2010 at 1:41 PM
My God, the commentator on FOX likened the walk of the demicraps to the civil rights days…has he no shame…fvcking a$$hole…
lovingmyUSA on March 21, 2010 at 1:42 PM
Hard to believe that she could be vicious…
Lanceman on March 21, 2010 at 1:42 PM
How dat?
Rovin on March 21, 2010 at 1:44 PM
Yeah, I think he was relaying what the DEMS think they’re doing/representing… arrogance personified.
Also said he’s seen ZERO proponents of the bill… LOL.
pambi on March 21, 2010 at 1:44 PM
Oh honey–I was a lot more innocent then…had lost a good man, and didn’t know the wrong one was waiting in the wings…
lovingmyUSA on March 21, 2010 at 1:46 PM
“These people are historical regressives dressed up in pretty rhetoric about fairness and compassion. I spit on all of them.”
venividivici on March 21, 2010 at 12:51 PM
.
veniV…they have had decades of media-prep!!!
.
“Your mind is totally controlled
It has been stuffed into my mold
And you will do as you are told
Untilbecause the rights to you are sold ”http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jonzFUPBelc
lobosan5 on March 21, 2010 at 1:48 PM
From RedState:
Contact Stupak and all other leaning reps
by typing in url: Congressman.(name)@mail.house.gov
My Dad sent this to me. Invaluable. You don’t have to go thru their websites. Sent Stupak an email this morning: Congressman.Stupak@mail.house.gov
EVERYBODY CALL AND EMAIL TO LET HIM KNOW NOT TO FOLD AND TO LET HIM KNOW WE WON’T BE FOOLED BY AN EO FROM OBAMA.
SheetAnchor on March 21, 2010 at 1:50 PM
You beat me by one refresh, SA !
I just did that, myself !
pambi on March 21, 2010 at 1:55 PM
Major just said Stupak’s spox says it’s still a NO
pambi on March 21, 2010 at 1:57 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4f6wzGpFKUQ
lovingmyUSA on March 21, 2010 at 1:57 PM
Stop being so intellectually dishonest. You know perfectly well these issues have been discussed and debated here on a daily basis for at least the last nine months. You also know that Republican lawmakers have offered alternative solutions — about two dozen or so if I recall correctly. Just because you and Nancy Pelosi and Barack Obama choose not to acknowledge that they exist doesn’t make it so.
I really don’t know why you persist in posting here. Do you just enjoy trolling for the sake of trolling? I realize you’re impressed with your own intellect, such that it is, but you’re not likely to change any minds here.
NoLeftTurn on March 21, 2010 at 2:03 PM
I don’t believe that, I am still an idealist…
That’s kinda like saying “”she deserved to be raped wearing clothes like that…doncha think…
lovingmyUSA on March 21, 2010 at 2:07 PM
We can take that reasoning further: “He deserved to be robbed. He had on nice clothes and probably had money.”
We are all responsible for controlling our own actions.
I never ever forced myself on any girl who was not amicable to the situation.
Lanceman on March 21, 2010 at 2:15 PM
Lance, one more thing, and then I will not hijack the thread…
That’s fricking cop-out. A person who uses that for an excuse, never intended to treat a woman right in the first place. Sounds like some flower child did you wrong…
lovingmyUSA on March 21, 2010 at 2:27 PM
We need that grounding now more than we have ever needed it before, from Classical Greece to more modern individuals like Rawls, if only to defeat this ideology in every respect.
We cannot win just by throwing things at the electorate and hoping some of it sticks and convicts them.
Holger on March 21, 2010 at 2:27 PM
C-span coverage… sob stories vs. TRUTH !
Help us Lord… the truth will set us free !
pambi on March 21, 2010 at 2:34 PM
Steyn made a good point in one of his articles criticizing Bush’s rhetoric in the war on terror when he said that even though Bush claimed “The desire for freedom is strong amongst Muslims around the world” it wasn’t even clear that the desire for freedom is strong in places like NYC, San Francisco, Toronto and other major Western metropolises. Why be free when you can have stuff “paid for” by “the rich” and be shielded from the negative consequences of your actions by the nanny state?
If you haven’t ever read a book called “The Art of Being Ruled”, you might want to check it out. Of all the books written in the 20th century about mass politics, I think it stands the test of time the best.
venividivici on March 21, 2010 at 2:38 PM
No, hon. I admit that I’m part of the problem, but the ‘free love’ thing changed society.
I’d love to find the right girl but I’m also realistic. Since I am part of the problem and refuse to change, it prob’ly ain’t gonna happen. I have been where you’ve been. Several times.
Lanceman on March 21, 2010 at 2:41 PM
The Art of Being Ruled by Wyndham Lewis? I’ll see if I can find it.
Hopefully it will be the exemption to my rule about more modern works (the more celebrated, the more useless).
Holger on March 21, 2010 at 2:45 PM
Ping pong anyone?
percysunshine on March 21, 2010 at 2:48 PM
Paul Ryan… this is a fiscal Frankenstein !!
GOOD ONE !! lots of applause, too !
pambi on March 21, 2010 at 2:49 PM
The Honest Truth®; most men are dogs who take their cues concerning relationships from women and society. If the majority of women or society sets low standards of behavior expect most men to devolve to that standard.
Women civilize Men, when women are uncivil, do not be surprised if Men themselves are uncivil.
Holger on March 21, 2010 at 2:50 PM
Nunes R-CA answering C-Span callers … referred to the fantasy, unicorns… LOL
pambi on March 21, 2010 at 2:54 PM
This is a discussion for another time, or on fb–but all I can say is thank God that I gave him my love freely, as he was killed one month after we finally decided to get married…that picture of me on fb is about 4months later
Now I need a drink to be able to handle the rest of this day…
lovingmyUSA on March 21, 2010 at 2:59 PM
Lanceman on March 21, 2010 at 2:41 PM
So, again, it’s all WOMAN’S fault…fvck I KNEW I shouldn’t have bit into that apple…
lovingmyUSA on March 21, 2010 at 3:02 PM
Sorry ’bout that. But remember, you’re among friends.
Lanceman on March 21, 2010 at 3:04 PM
And I left you a couple of comments on your wall on FB.
Lanceman on March 21, 2010 at 3:05 PM
Present point of order: challenging the earmarks/bribes .. Issa, R-CA.
Slaughter is the one challenging Issa … oy.
pambi on March 21, 2010 at 3:08 PM
Slaughter says they will not be in the bill to be signed .. ‘nothing in there will be ‘state-specific, but more general’ LOLOLOL
pambi on March 21, 2010 at 3:12 PM
This will be a straight forward exercise.
1) ‘Yea’ on the ammended Senate bill (reconciliation package)
2) ‘Ney’ on the Repiblican substitute.
3) ‘Ney’ on the Senate bill.
Ping Pong back to Harry Reids court.
If anyone thought that this Zombie ‘night of the living dead’ episode would be over Monday morning…
percysunshine on March 21, 2010 at 3:13 PM
I believe I’m on record as a ‘no’.
Lanceman on March 21, 2010 at 3:14 PM
INTERESTING stuff, to a weirdo, like me ! HAHA
Inquiries being made that Slaughter just said the ‘bribes’ are no longer in there as previously understood… so…
must this RETURN to the Senate for a vote ??
Lovin’ this … LOLOL.
pambi on March 21, 2010 at 3:21 PM
Nye a Nay?
B-A Bay
B-E Bee
B-I Bickee Bye
B-O Boe
Bickey Bye Boe B-U Boo
Bickey Bye Boe Boo!
C-A Cay
C-E Cee
C-I Cickee Cye
C-O Coe
Cickey Cye Coe C-U Coo
Cickey Cye Coe Coo!
D-A Day
D-E Dee
D-I Dickee Dye
D-O Doe
Dickey Dye Doe D-U Doo
Dickey Dye Doe Doo!
F-A Fay
F-E Fee
F-I Fickee Fye
F-O Foe
Fickey Fye Foe F-U Foo
Fickey Fye Foe Foo!
G-A Gay
G-E Gee
G-I Gickee Gye
G-O Goe
Gickey Gye Goe G-U Goo
Gickey Gye Goe Goo!
H-A Hay
H-E Hee
H-I Hickee Hye
H-O Hoe
Hickey Hye Hoe H-U Hoo
Hickey Hye Hoe Hoo!
J-A Jay
J-E Jee
J-I Jickee Jye
J-O Joe
Jickey Jye Joe J-U Joo
Jickey Jye Joe Joo!
K-A Kay
K-E Kee
K-I Kickee Kye
K-O Koe
Kickey Kye Koe K-U Koo
Kickey Kye Koe Koo!
L-A Lay
L-E Lee
L-I Lickee Lye
L-O Loe
Lickey Lye Loe L-U Loo
Lickey Lye Loe Loo!
M-A May
M-E Mee
M-I Mickee Mye
M-O Moe
Mickey Mye Moe M-U Moo
Mickey Mye Moe Moo!
N-A Nay
N-E Nee
N-I Nickee Nye
N-O Noe
Nickey Nye Noe N-U Noo
Nickey Nye Noe Noo!
P-A Pay
P-E Pee
P-I Pickee Pye
P-O Poe
Pickey Pye Poe P-U Poo
Pickey Pye Poe Poo!
Q-A Qay
Q-E Qee
Q-I Qickee Qye
Q-O Qoe
Qickey Qye Qoe Q-U Qoo
Qickey Qye Qoe Qoo!
R-A Ray
R-E Ree
R-I Rickee Rye
R-O Roe
Rickey Rye Roe R-U Roo
Rickey Rye Roe Roo!
S-A Say
S-E See
S-I Sickee Sye
S-O Soe
Sickey Sye Soe S-U Soo
Sickey Sye Soe Soo!
T-A Tay
T-E Tee
T-I Tickee Tye
T-O Toe
Tickey Tye Toe T-U Too
Tickey Tye Toe Too!
V-A Vay
V-E Vee
V-I Vickee Vye
V-O Voe
Vickey Vye Voe V-U Voo
Vickey Vye Voe Voo!
W-A Way
W-E Wee
W-I Wickee Wye
W-O Woe
Wickey Wye Woe W-U Woo
Wickey Wye Woe Woo!
X-A Xay
X-E Xee
X-I Xickee Xye
X-O Xoe
Xickey Xye Xoe X-U Xoo
Xickey Xye Xoe Xoo!
Y-A Yay
Y-E Yee
Y-I Yickee Yye
Y-O Yoe
Yickey Yye Yoe Y-U Yoo
Yickey Yye Yoe Yoo!
Z-A Zay
Z-E Zee
Z-I Zickee Zye
Z-O Zoe
Zickey Zye Zoe Z-U Zoo
Zickey Zye Zoe Zoo!
OxyCon on March 21, 2010 at 3:21 PM
OMG–I have just enough whiskey for today….the store clerk is going to think I’m an alcoholic…though I try to explain to her each time that it’s because of Obama…
lovingmyUSA on March 21, 2010 at 3:23 PM
Nay.
Oops,
percysunshine on March 21, 2010 at 3:25 PM
“Common sense tell you that you dont need to bribe someone if something is good”–former Ohio congressman Bob McEwen
lovingmyUSA on March 21, 2010 at 3:25 PM
Dems = we are SOOOO wonderful !!
Repubs = over many dead bodies !!
(paraphrased, of course) ;-)
pambi on March 21, 2010 at 3:27 PM
We should probably meet up for drinks…..
Lanceman on March 21, 2010 at 3:31 PM
That’s the one. Trust me, it is completely “uncelebrated”, in the sense that when I went to my university library to check out a copy for the first time, the only copy they had hadn’t been checked out since the 1950s!
venividivici on March 21, 2010 at 3:32 PM
SOOOO super this vote’s taken on Sunday…
because we all need to step out in faith !
pambi on March 21, 2010 at 3:32 PM
Oh, it isn’t all the fault of women. Men should demand more from themselves
But equally, when women don’t demand a lot, they are just as culpable. You may demand a lot, but most women I’ve run into would put out on the 1st date and be happy with a note left on the nightstand before the man sneaks out.
Holger on March 21, 2010 at 3:41 PM
Stupak in front of the cameras !!
Have reached an agreement !
EXEC ORDER !!
pambi on March 21, 2010 at 4:08 PM
There we go, folks !!
Holy crapoli ! Surely the EO is debateable, too, yes ?
pambi on March 21, 2010 at 4:11 PM
Cavuto says we’re now down to 5 undecideds.
Can’t believe they bought this from such a LIAR !!
Da*m !!
pambi on March 21, 2010 at 4:16 PM
Then maybe you shouldn’t pick up women in bars…
lovingmyUSA on March 21, 2010 at 6:26 PM
He’s right, though. Men will behave like jackasses if women let them.
Adam fell because of Eve.
atheling on March 21, 2010 at 6:57 PM
Who do we blame for last night? Well George W. Bush, of course:
Mr. Joe on March 22, 2010 at 8:07 AM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 … 4 5 6