More no-mentum: Lynch says firm “no” from earlier yes on ObamaCare

posted at 2:14 pm on March 18, 2010 by Ed Morrissey

Many people predicted that an optimistic CBO score, even if preliminary, would result in Democrats flipping on ObamaCare.  Few would have predicted that the first two flips went the other way.  After Michael Arcuri started spreading the news that Pelosi couldn’t count on his New York vote, Stephen Lynch gives another no from Massachusetts:

Rep. Stephen Lynch (D-Mass.) is a firm “no” on health care reform — in large measure because he opposes the idea of any kind of excise tax on Cadillac plans, even one that’s delayed for years and years.

That’s put Lynch a former ironworkers union official in Boston at odds with many union biggies, who are swallowing hard and accepting a proposed House-Senate compromise.

Lynch — who voted for the tax-less House bill last year — has become a serious target of his union buddies, enduring pickets at his district office, an AFL-CIO robocall blitz and at least one recent drop-in visit from a very influential old friend — Joseph J. Hunt, president of the International Association of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental and Reinforcing Iron Workers.

The irony of this is just too delicious.  Lynch is taking a position that protects union workers from getting slammed by the new excise tax.  Do union bosses cheer Lynch for his stand?  No — they’re threatening him instead.  Who do the union bosses really represent these days?

Democrats had hoped to hold Lynch to a yes.  Apparently, though, Lynch has seen enough, both on Capitol Hill and at home.  After all, this is the same state that sent Scott Brown to replace Ted Kennedy specifically to stop ObamaCare from becoming law.  On Capitol Hill, Lynch blasted the Slaughter strategy as “disingenuous”:

Even one of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s floor whips, U.S. Rep. Stephen Lynch, says a proposed parliamentary move to pass health-care reform would be “disingenuous” and harm the credibility of Congress.

In a sign of how tough it’s been for Pelosi to round up votes for the massive bill, Lynch – a South Boston Democrat who supported a House reform package last year – said he’ll probably vote against a key Senate version of the legislation, unless unexpected major changes are made soon.

Lynch, who serves as one of Pelosi’s key vote counters, said he also can’t support a proposed “deem and pass” procedure that would allow Democrats to vote to strip out controversial portions of the Senate bill and then “deem” that the entire package has passed without a second, direct vote.

“It’s disingenuous,” said Lynch, who considers unfair a Senate provision to tack a surcharge on higher-end health plans. “It would really call into question the credibility of the House.”

If Pelosi can’t even hold onto her floor whips, she’s in serious trouble.  She got her momentum, all right — in the wrong direction.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

Dale on March 18, 2010 at 3:18 PM

The people “voting” on InTrade on an issue like this, aren’t likely to have any more privileged information than you or I, much less Ed or AllahPundit.

notropis on March 18, 2010 at 3:34 PM

Part time workers taken off the payroll and paid with cash under the table:
- Tax revenues will fall
- SS revenues will fall
- Newly uninsured will use the emergency rooms

The underground economy will flourish. Cash and barter will be used just as it was in the old Soviet Union.

Dale on March 18, 2010 at 3:38 PM

She got her momentum, all right — in the wrong direction.

heh

cmsinaz on March 18, 2010 at 3:42 PM

The underground economy will flourish. Cash and barter will be used just as it was in the old Soviet Union.

Dale on March 18, 2010 at 3:38 PM

“yo…whasup? Wad ya lookin’ fo?”

“need a band-aid…just one…”

“I got ya, bro…$20 for a new one…$5 for a washup”

“gimme the washup..I’m bleedin’ bad….I ain’t got no $20 for a band-aid”

“here ya go…now git outta here…bleedin’ all over…messin up my bidness”

BobMbx on March 18, 2010 at 3:46 PM

“It’s disingenuous,” said Lynch, who considers unfair a Senate provision to tack a surcharge on higher-end health plans. “It would really call into question the credibility of the House.”

SO WHY THE HELL DID HE JUST VOTE YES ON IT?

You absolute toad, Mr Lynch. Dying to hear you explain this one.

Edouard on March 18, 2010 at 3:49 PM

San Fran Nan always looks like she knows more about constipation than the Constitution! :)

chickasaw42 on March 18, 2010 at 4:00 PM

These are just the folks nanzi is telling to vote no to save their careers, nothing more. She has the votes, nothing will stop this mad witch.

Please, God, let me be wrong!!!

runawayyyy on March 18, 2010 at 4:03 PM

That is the only way it can be passed.
Vashta.Nerada on March 18, 2010 at 3:34 PM

No, not really. The Dims can still call for an up-or-down vote. They’ll just do it on their terms, and not on the terms of the Republicans who forced this vote. If you mean that Pelosi won’t be able to get 216 reps to vote for this bill to pass up-or-down then, yes, the Slaughter Rule is the only way for this to pass.

joejm65 on March 18, 2010 at 4:13 PM

They’ve started running pressure ads on Lynch this morning on the radio – call Lynch tell him to stand with Massachusetts families. Etc. Real filth. Paid for groupd called “Catholics United.”

TheBigOldDog on March 19, 2010 at 7:06 AM

Lynch is my Rep and I am truly gobsmacked.

roy_batty on March 19, 2010 at 1:35 PM

Comment pages: 1 2