Immigration another obstacle for ObamaCare?
posted at 8:48 am on March 11, 2010 by Ed Morrissey
Last year, Barack Obama pledged to pursue immigration reform in 2010 in what was widely acknowledged as a midterm-election strategy to split the Republicans and anger Hispanic voters. Of course, that required closing the deal on ObamaCare first, which has run aground at the moment in snarls of parliamentary procedure, concerns over abortion and taxation of union benefit plans, and strong disapproval from voters. Now, in a little taste of karma, immigration has reared its head as another obstacle for Obama’s primary domestic agenda issue:
A group of Hispanic lawmakers on Thursday will tell President Barack Obama that they may not vote for healthcare reform unless changes are made to the bill’s immigration provisions.
The scheduled meeting comes as Democratic leaders and the White House are struggling to craft a final bill that will attract 216 votes in the lower chamber. …
Since last fall, Congressional Hispanic Caucus (CHC) members have kept quiet, at least publicly, about their objections to the immigration provisions in the Senate bill.
The Senate language would prohibit illegal immigrants’ buying healthcare coverage from the proposed health exchanges. The House-passed bill isn’t as restrictive, but it does — like the Senate bill — bar illegal immigrants from receiving federal subsidies to buy health insurance.
Hispanic Democrats say they haven’t moved from their stance that they will not vote for a healthcare bill containing the Senate’s prohibitions.
The Senate didn’t write that provision out of spite. People buying health insurance in the exchanges have access to federal subsidies, as much as $10,000 per year, to assist in buying health coverage. Despite what The Hill reports here, the House refused to add an amendment that would have created an enforcement mechanism to ensure that illegal immigrants didn’t get subsidies. (So did the Senate, initially.) The Senate eventually decided, wisely, that voters already unhappy with the entire government takeover of health care in the country would revolt if their tax dollars went to subsidize coverage for people illegally residing in the US.
This problem cannot be resolved through the reconciliation process. It’s not a budgetary issue, at least not directly. This is a policy issue, and that would require a new vote in the Senate. If Pelosi can’t get the CHC to get back on board, then reconciliation is a dead strategy, and Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid may as well call for a conference committee instead.
The question is how serious the CHC threat really is. There are 24 members in this bloc, not as large as the Congressional Black Caucus, but significant enough to derail ObamaCare. Every member was a yes vote the first time around, on the House version, of course. They have remained very quiet about this issue until very late in the game. Are they really taking a stand on principle — or are they putting pressure on Pelosi and Obama to jump into immigration reform now in order to get amnesty and render the entire question moot? I’d bet on the latter, and take this threat with a large grain of salt.
Update: John from Verum Serum sees it the other way around: Obama took them for granted and now dangles immigration reform to jolly them back on board. We’ll see.
Related Posts:









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
As I just posted HotairLib has their whole head up their six o clock.
hamradio on May 24, 2013 at 2:43 PM
Who wrote the speech? Or are you just praising the messenger?
mixplix on May 24, 2013 at 2:57 PM
Connect the dots: journolist meeting by invitation only at the White House on, what Tuesday?, “big”speech by Obama on Thursday, lame stream media fawning over speech on Friday. Who would have seen that coming, huh?
parke on May 24, 2013 at 2:58 PM
They need the “war on terror” in order to further erode our Constitutional freedoms and to deflect criticism from the administration’s and Federal government’s ongoing corruption.
They are just trying to massage it so that they don’t offend the Muslims, international Libtards and their own sensibilities anymore than necessary.
A few Muslim terrorists here and there are quite expendable to this Administration despite their sympathies for them. These drone attacks also do much deflect any potential criticism that the Administration is weak in dealing with such matters.
Dr. ZhivBlago on May 24, 2013 at 2:59 PM
MSNBC is nothing but a left wing propaganda machine serving their master, Obama.
rplat on May 24, 2013 at 3:07 PM
I believe that he was officially nominated 10 days after he was sworn in. Wow! The WON really worked long hours that week and a half to earn that POS medal. During those ten days he ordered NO DRONE STRIKES to keep his peaceful record clean.
fred5678 on May 24, 2013 at 3:22 PM
Obama: Don’t worry about that Ben Ghazi guy. I killed Bin Laden, and Bush didn’t!
And Obummer still wants to close Gitmo? Good luck with that–not even Upchuck Schumer was willing to hold trials in New York!
Steve Z on May 24, 2013 at 3:24 PM
They just changed the definition of terrorist. They used to be jihadis from the Middle East–now they’re Minutemen in Arizona and Tea Partiers in Ohio.
Steve Z on May 24, 2013 at 3:29 PM
Erika, sometimes your writing shows signs of rivaling even the Master of Snark himself, Allahpundit. Good work!
KS Rex on May 24, 2013 at 3:45 PM
I love how crazy Al invoked the Nobel Peace Prize in praise of a speech that spoke about dropping bombs on people’s head. Maybe it was the “fewer” bombs than before that raised this to historic levels.
Do they even know or care that they are morons.
marnes on May 24, 2013 at 3:46 PM
His speech made less sense than Bluto’s Animal House Speech and was far less entertaining. Nothing less than base rallying time. Never thought I would say this, but Code Pink was the best part.
DDay on May 24, 2013 at 4:01 PM
Sperling posted this at the Examiner on May 23 about this “historic speech of Obysmal’s:
You see, we are just not working hard enough to “work with the Muslim American community” who are a “fundamental part of the American family.” Watch out, too, because Obysmal is again trying to limit the impact of the Internet.
onlineanalyst on May 24, 2013 at 4:22 PM
That Chris Hayes is a bit of a twink, isn’t he?
onlineanalyst on May 24, 2013 at 4:25 PM
Obama apparently gave two speeches yesterday and I watched the other one.
myiq2xu on May 24, 2013 at 5:03 PM
Nah. I’d detest the little pissant s.o.b. if he was white…or Asian…or any one of the myriad of made-up racial divisions.
Solaratov on May 24, 2013 at 11:00 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2