Reason: The Pork Party House

posted at 2:55 pm on March 9, 2010 by Ed Morrissey

Call it the award that keeps on giving … but not to its recipients. Reason TV uses the case of the Sewall-Belmont House to make larger points about pork, but the taxpayer dollars flowing into the tony Washington DC banquet hall is questionable enough. Despite its high-profile business in hosting the rich and powerful inside the Beltway for social and political events, it turns out that American taxpayers have underwritten the enterprise with millions in pork — including a million dollars from one of their award recipients:

“Over the last 10 years, the Sewall-Belmont House has gotten over $3.4 million in earmarks,” says Leslie Paige of Citizens Against Government Waste.

Reporters often highlight the most ridiculous examples, but politicians have learned how to make their pork projects sound uncontroversial, even appealing.

Just say your project will help children, senior citizens, or—if you really want to slip under the radar—direct taxpayer dough to a museum. “Museums are one of the biggies because they sound so good,” says Paige.

Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-La.) used that angle to direct a million-dollar earmark to the Sewall-Belmont House (after the Senator received an award from the Sewall-Belmont House). Turns out Landrieu was just getting warmed up, because her recent $300 million “Louisiana Purchase” shot her into the ranks of pork legends.

This is the kind of mutual backscratching that has created an explosion in earmarks over the last generation, and that has solidified the grip on power by career politicians looking to curry favor. Landrieu got notoriety for her Louisiana Purchase in the Senate version of ObamaCare, but this is perhaps even less defensible. The buy-off on ObamaCare was intended to cushion the blow of federal mandates on Medicaid that ObamaCare creates in Louisiana. What interest does the Sewall-Belmont House payoff serve for her constituents?

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Mary Landrieu: Porker.

SouthernGent on March 9, 2010 at 3:01 PM

I guess it’s a good thing the people don’t need that money to buy food and other unnecessary items./sarc

Chip on March 9, 2010 at 3:01 PM

Now I have a craving for a B.L.T.

Electrongod on March 9, 2010 at 3:02 PM

What interest does the Sewall-Belmont House payoff serve for her constituents?

Well, hopefully they rent rooms by the hour…because once again, the taxpayers are getting screwed!

search4truth on March 9, 2010 at 3:04 PM

This isn’t pork.

This is grand larceny.

Shy Guy on March 9, 2010 at 3:06 PM

Mmmmmmm…bacon.

Nick has got to be the easiest person to shop for, “A black t-shirt! How did you know?”

WashJeff on March 9, 2010 at 3:10 PM

Not Halal!

daesleeper on March 9, 2010 at 3:10 PM

If politicians were smart, and we know that they aren’t, they should negotiate less money being sent from their state to D.C. and allow states to take care of their own problems. How in the world does it make sense to send money there to support a useless bureaucracy, employees, and regulations and get a fraction of the money sent back? They think the Constitution is a joke.

Cindy Munford on March 9, 2010 at 3:11 PM

Mary is starting to bear a striking resemblance to Miss Piggy, isn’t she?

capejasmine on March 9, 2010 at 3:12 PM

Insert prostitution references here.

Midas on March 9, 2010 at 3:15 PM

Someone call Mary Landrieu!

SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOEY!!!!!

pilamaye on March 9, 2010 at 3:17 PM

Mary is starting to bear a striking resemblance to Miss Piggy, isn’t she?

capejasmine on March 9, 2010 at 3:12 PM

She’s not fat, that is just money stuffed into her G string.

Aviator on March 9, 2010 at 3:19 PM

I’m going to legally have my name changed to “Ear Mark”.

Some elected knucklehead will eventually fall for the ruse and make me a millionaire.

BobMbx on March 9, 2010 at 3:24 PM

I’m going to legally have my name changed to “Ear Mark”.

BobMbx on March 9, 2010 at 3:24 PM

But then you would think that the Tea Party is trying to eliminate you when they chant, “No more Ear Marks!”

WashJeff on March 9, 2010 at 3:27 PM

I’m going to legally have my name changed to “Ear Mark”.

Some elected knucklehead will eventually fall for the ruse and make me a millionaire.

BobMbx on March 9, 2010 at 3:24 PM

ROFL!!!

capejasmine on March 9, 2010 at 3:30 PM

I’m going to legally have my name changed to “Ear Mark”.

Some elected knucklehead will eventually fall for the ruse and make me a millionaire.

BobMbx on March 9, 2010 at 3:24 PM

LMAO! Put that on your Census form!

Key West Reader on March 9, 2010 at 3:36 PM

You’re giving bacon a bad rap.

publiuspen on March 9, 2010 at 3:36 PM

The camera has probably added 20 pounds to Senator Landrieu’s appearance.

That and food.

jdflorida on March 9, 2010 at 3:44 PM

This would be funny if the taxpayers weren’t being forced to bribe and kickback with taxpayer money. This without doubt is the most corrupt anti-American administration in our history. Ignorance is no excuse for putting thugs like this into office.

volsense on March 9, 2010 at 3:45 PM

If the congress doesn’t get the message, they should consider Sen. Kay Baily Huchison’s failed bid for Texas Gov. Gov. Perry wrapped all that bacon she brought home around her neck and kicked her ham.

cartooner on March 9, 2010 at 3:49 PM

Time for another wake up call on ear marks.

tommer74 on March 9, 2010 at 4:09 PM

I’d call Landrieu’s office and complain, but you cannot get through.

GnuBreed on March 9, 2010 at 4:16 PM

Mary looks like she’s been hitting the pork a little too heavy.

Jaibones on March 9, 2010 at 5:29 PM

The camera has probably added 20 pounds to Senator Landrieu’s appearance.

That and food.

jdflorida on March 9, 2010 at 3:44 PM

How many cameras does she have on her?

PatMac on March 9, 2010 at 8:23 PM