Iraq election turnout as high as 60%
posted at 10:12 am on March 8, 2010 by Ed Morrissey
Once again, Iraqis turned out in droves to cast their votes in national elections. Estimates for turnout range from 55-60%, even though terrorist attacks wound up killing 36 people yesterday:
The range given by Faraj al-Haidari, who heads the Independent High Electoral Commission, is down from the December 2005 parliamentary election turnout of 76 per cent, although it’s higher than last year’s provincial elections when just over half of voters cast ballots. If the preliminary figure, due to be officially announce later today, falls within this range it is likely to be considered a disappointing but still credible level of participation. The full results of the election will take several days to arrive.
Turnout is an important measure of success for the election. To be credible and effective, Iraq’s next government will need the backing of a large number of people in the deeply divided country.
The election was marred by violence yet according to the American military less than was initially reported. Al Qaeda is said to have fooled the Iraqi government and millions of voters into believing they were under attack from sustained mortar fire.
Would a 60% turnout really be consided “disappointing”? If so, then some American elections would fall into that category as well. Given the violence and the threats — al-Qaeda spent hours simulating mortar fire with bottle bombs to intimidate Iraqis — a 60% turnout looks a lot more courageous than disappointing.
Of course, part of the calculus in that equation depends on who voted, and where. If the Sunnis participated in strong numbers, that will be seen as an indication that the Iraqis have begun to transfer the issues between Shi’a and Sunni from the gun to the ballot. Sunnis mostly boycotted the first national election, but have participated in varying strength in following elections. If their numbers drop significantly from the previous election, it will be seen as a signal that the Sunnis mave rejected the political framework of the new Iraq and may return to armed resistance. That appeared to be their direction a few weeks ago, when Baghdad disqualified hundreds of Sunni candidates, most of which were returned to the ballot later.
Two facts are indisputable: the Iraqis continue to show courage and commitment to their new democracy, and the terrorists have not been beaten yet. We should keep both in mind when developing policy regarding Iraq.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
I think we achieved 29% participation in last month’s IL primary. Take that Iraq!!!!
WashJeff on March 8, 2010 at 10:18 AM
It’s a good thing Obama and Joe Biden single-handedly liberated those people.
Good Lt on March 8, 2010 at 10:20 AM
Hmmm.I wonder if this could be us in 2012?I really wonder even how safe we will be this November?With this spoiled child in charge,anything is possible.
ohiobabe on March 8, 2010 at 10:21 AM
I’m impressed. Not too many Cousin Pookies there.
katy the mean old lady on March 8, 2010 at 10:22 AM
I damn near had an aneurism yesterday when President B. Hussein Obama came on the radio lauding the successs of the elections in the face of violence.
Sheer hubris.
daesleeper on March 8, 2010 at 10:22 AM
I couldn’t help but smile, when I saw whole families showing up to vote in Iraq yesterday. They talked to one woman, who with a large smile, said….she came to vote against the terrorists. That just kinda puts it in perspective for me.
Most of the voters knew there could be a chance of danger, for voting, but did so anyway.I pray these people find their way, and can make their nation a peaceful, and productive one for all their citizens, and destroy the evils of terrorism. Prayers to those who stand up, and fight for freedom, and Democracy everywhere.
capejasmine on March 8, 2010 at 10:23 AM
My next question would be ,are WE THE PEOPLE willing to risk life and limb for our country???
ohiobabe on March 8, 2010 at 10:23 AM
60%?
Why I remember when Saddam would get 99% voter turn out and win with 99.9% of the vote…
myrenovations on March 8, 2010 at 10:23 AM
Related: Iraq Flies Emergency Aid to U.S. in Support of Democratic Efforts There http://optoons.blogspot.com/2010/03/iraq-flies-emergency-aid-to-us-in.html
Mervis Winter on March 8, 2010 at 10:26 AM
Bottle bombs to simulate Mortar rounds? They must be getting desperately low on munitions. It would still be very,very scary to head to the voting booths over there and I am amazed at how brave those people are, having seen the conditions they lived under.
One of the oldest pranks in the book is the MRE heater in a plastic water bottle “bomb”. It’s actually incredibly loud and very easy to scare people with because it looks like a piece of trash. Not that I ever did anything like that….
Mord on March 8, 2010 at 10:28 AM
Meaning that about 60% of Iraqis voted for somebody other than Saddam–a huge improvement! Thank you, George Dubya Bush!
Steve Z on March 8, 2010 at 10:29 AM
I contrast this story with the one in the headlines from the BBC that Internet access is a fundamental right. I would bet that if you gave the Iraquis a choice of a computer in the library or a chance to express their liberty, they’d get it right 10/10 times.
jdfister on March 8, 2010 at 10:30 AM
W !!!!!!!!!!!!
lavell12 on March 8, 2010 at 10:30 AM
I forget – was that in Chicago?
Midas on March 8, 2010 at 10:31 AM
Remember ACORN and the New Black Panthers in Philly?
Steve Z on March 8, 2010 at 10:31 AM
I wonder if we will be afraid going to the polls in future elections. It’s definitely a right I think a lot of people don’t even think about.
Way to go Iraqi people and GWB!
gophergirl on March 8, 2010 at 10:33 AM
It’s all Bush’s fault.
donkichi on March 8, 2010 at 10:34 AM
Remember ACORN and the New Black Panthers in Philly?
Steve Z on March 8, 2010 at 10:31 AM
//
I will never forget that picture and that reinforced in my mind the fact that they will not intimidate me!I just hope by the time the elections roll around,we are all on the same page,for then they cannot defeat us!!!
ohiobabe on March 8, 2010 at 10:35 AM
Electrongod on March 8, 2010 at 10:35 AM
60% participation sounds pretty good, they haven’t reached the point where they take democracy for granted the way we do. Lets hope we can acheive that level of participation in November.
fourdeucer on March 8, 2010 at 10:36 AM
Only a small portion of us. Centrists, progressive/moderate republitards need not apply.
MadDogF on March 8, 2010 at 10:37 AM
I’d be willing to wager that 60% of registered voters in America have never even voted.
uknowmorethanme on March 8, 2010 at 10:41 AM
Whatever is happening in Iraq, it is despite the best efforts of the filthy lying coward in the White House and his corrupt party. Were it up to Obama, Reid, Pelosi, and the rest of these bastards; Iraq would still be under the control of Saddam Hussein. For the Dems to come in now, after years of calling American troops genocidal killers, of calling the war lost, and demanding immediate withdrawal…. It makes my blood boil that are claiming any part in success. It is like all those hangers on who suddenly became New Orleans Saints fans after the Super Bowl.
highhopes on March 8, 2010 at 10:41 AM
Only a small portion of us. Centrists, progressive/moderate republitards need not apply.
MadDogF on March 8, 2010 at 10:37 AM
//
I refuse to believe that by the time the elections roll around we will still be the minority.That is what the msm would want us to believe.I ,for one,don’t.
ohiobabe on March 8, 2010 at 10:41 AM
I think that lovely old lady on the home page is giving terrorist scum the finger.
WannabeAnglican on March 8, 2010 at 10:41 AM
Did you notice how “The Troops” have changed their roles under Obama, helping kids and delivering flowers to the elderly instead of terrorizing villagers and torturing husbands and fathers like they did under George W. Bush?
jay12 on March 8, 2010 at 10:42 AM
uknowmorethanme on March 8, 2010 at 10:43 AM
Dang, sorry I can’t join the fight for freedom. Thanks for fighting for me though, very nice of you.
uknowmorethanme on March 8, 2010 at 10:44 AM
I think that lovely old lady on the home page is giving terrorist scum the finger.
//
That is a sweet picture isn’t it?The fact that she would even let them take her picture is a testament to how far they have come.
ohiobabe on March 8, 2010 at 10:45 AM
Only a small portion of us. Centrists, progressive/moderate republitards need not apply.
MadDogF on March 8, 2010 at 10:37 AM
//
Thought of S/Adams’ quote..It does not require a majority to prevail,but rather a tireless minority,keen to set brushfires in people’s minds.
ohiobabe on March 8, 2010 at 10:50 AM
“The War in Iraq is lost!!”
Harry Reid
Senate floor
…..Thank God the democrats lost and
………….Freedom won!!!!
Baxter Greene on March 8, 2010 at 11:00 AM
I’d rather have the idiots who started this massive debt ball rolling, got commies elected, and still continue to support their failed policies stay out of the fight.
Your dog’s left this hunt a long time ago.
MadDogF on March 8, 2010 at 11:01 AM
So when’s the parade scheduled down Constitution Ave., the 10th of Never-ber?
John Kerry can throw out the first medals.
NoDonkey on March 8, 2010 at 11:04 AM
Afghanistan is still a mess…but I daresay there is yet hope for Iraq.
Dark-Star on March 8, 2010 at 11:09 AM
Once again, the Iraqis appear to have raised a thicket of purple fingers in the faces of the would-be authors of their national obituary.
Noocyte on March 8, 2010 at 11:29 AM
Nah. The whole region is a great seething ball of rage and fail and probably always will be.
I hope I’m wrong, really, but I don’t think so.
TheUnrepentantGeek on March 8, 2010 at 11:30 AM
Iraq or Afghanistan?
The former, at least, isn’t dominated by little village kingdoms filled with back-@$$wards dirt farmers. How the hell we ever hope to get them to follow any authority bigger than their local
silverbackschieftans without resorting to brute force is a mystery to me.Dark-Star on March 8, 2010 at 11:49 AM
Dark-Star on March 8, 2010 at 11:49 AM
We solved that very problem with the Commanches years ago, but then we didn’t get all weepy about obliterating stone age criminals back then, we just eliminated them, good and bad.
Which is the only way to solve the problem, but no one wants to admit it.
NoDonkey on March 8, 2010 at 11:56 AM
If we had to deal with violence and threats in this country in order to go vote, 60% would be impossible. It wouldn’t even come close. Half that would be a miracle.
Red Cloud on March 8, 2010 at 11:56 AM
Well, the US is a bad comparison because we’re pretty well off (despite what the fringes on both sides always say) so people have less incentive to show up to vote.
Israel might be a better comparison, but even there the numbers have only been around 65-70% in the 2000′s. I think that this is skewed downward because it counts the many eligible voters who live outside Israel and are unlikely to vote, so the number among residents is higher. But even so, Iraq’s 55-60% is pretty good in comparison to that.
tneloms on March 8, 2010 at 12:07 PM
Congrats to the FREE people of Iraq.
Tony737 on March 8, 2010 at 12:19 PM
You just have to admire the courage of a voting public and politicians who brave bombs and bullets to improve their country.
NavyMustang on March 8, 2010 at 12:20 PM
These folks were told they would DIE if they voted. 60% went out in spite of this very real threat. Dozens died voting!
If this is not proof that Iraq wanted to be liberated from Saddam and that these are people yearning to be self-governed, nothing is.
Of course, the press will see the upcoming years of progress in Iraq as Obama’s success. And history will always label Bush as evil for “invading” that now sovereign country.
Opposite Day on March 8, 2010 at 12:29 PM
Muslims don’t do honest democracy, they do corrupt demockracy.
BL@KBIRD on March 8, 2010 at 12:36 PM
I don’t think Iran will allow a free, relatively secular nation to exist next to them unmolested. They’ll keep sending nutjobs across the border to raise hell and breed more nutjobs.
Ultimately I think it’s going to come down to a pissing match between the Sunni and the Shia to decide who gets to murder the Kurds.
TheUnrepentantGeek on March 8, 2010 at 2:05 PM
***
The Iraqi people are very brave. Our brave Military gave them freedom, and they are going to enjoy it. Like many Germans, Japanese, Italians, French, and South Koreans do–paid for by American Blood and money.
***
Good thing the “lets talk to evil and make a deal” mentality did not exist then. These people would still be slaves–like in Cuba today–if Comrade Obama’s (PBUH) and Hillary Clinton’s Neville Chamberlain approach to defending freedom had been used instead.
***
John Bibb
***
rocketman on March 8, 2010 at 2:17 PM
How does this apply to Muslim-American voters or candidates?
The Race Card on March 8, 2010 at 2:19 PM
I agree. Way to go Iraqi voters—-good for you and your country. I am proud to see Iraqis go to polls in the face of these terrorists and show them down. That’s inspiring and encouraging.
ted c on March 8, 2010 at 2:51 PM
Why is the Mainstream Media making a big deal of 36 dead Iraqi voters?
Hell, there were millions of dead American voters that voted for Obama in 2008 and the Mainstream Media didn’t seem to mind that !!
CatchAll on March 8, 2010 at 8:51 PM