Where to try Gadahn?

posted at 3:30 pm on March 7, 2010 by Ed Morrissey

With the news of Adam Gadahn’s capture in Pakistan mostly confirmed, an interesting question has arisen, both on Twitter and in the blogosphere.  Where should the Obama administration try Gadahn?  The White House will apparently reverse Eric Holder’s decision to try Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and the other 9/11 conspirators in federal court, but can they also try Gadahn by military commission?  And should they, if so?

It depends at least in part on what charges the US levies against Gadahn.  Theoretically, they could charge him with terrorist activity abroad, charges that a military commission could adjudicate.  However, the evidence that Gadahn himself committed or facilitated actual terrorist acts may not be terribly convincing, nor is that what made Gadahn notorious in the first place.  He’s been more of a Lord Haw Haw, a propagandist reportedly not terribly well liked or trusted by his own side.  CNN talked a bit about that today in its reporting, wondering if the Taliban secretly arranged to have the ISI take him off their hands.

Besides, the US already has an indictment against Gadahn for treason, from 2006.  That indictment would require a federal trial to adjudicate, putting aside the enormously dangerous precedent of using military commissions to try American citizens.  The path of least resistance in this case would appear to also be the appropriate path — and it won’t take much effort to prove treason in this case.  Gadahn’s latest missive in urging Muslim soldiers in America to attack troops was released just as news of his capture hit the wires, and his years-long track record of giving aid, comfort, and more to the American enemy al-Qaeda should make this a rather easy win for the Obama administration in federal court.  Gadahn will be the first American tried for treason in almost 60 years, but all that means is that the winning percentage will improve.

Let Gadahn face his existing indictment, after intelligence experts get done interrogating him.  Treason carries the death penalty, and that should satisfy everyone.

Update: Rick Moran wonders if we’ll even get the chance to try him, given Pakistan’s refusal to extradite captured terrorists.  This case would be different, I’d guess, since Gadahn is an American citizen.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

Mord on March 7, 2010 at 3:56
Rational Thought on March 7, 2010 at 3:57 PM
thomasaur on March 7, 2010 at 4:31 PM

This would be the OJ trial on steroidal clusterbombs. A years-long, non-sensical, $100M BS Kaliphornia jury trial ending in acquittal, as lefty hero-worship runs amok with the t-shirt and kaffeah sales. I hope the Pakis do us all a favor, and cut his head off sometime next week, after a thorough interrogation of course.

Fishoutofwater on March 7, 2010 at 4:47 PM

CNN talked a bit about that today in its reporting, wondering if the Taliban secretly arranged to have the ISI take him off their hands.

CNN “reports”? News to me and millions.

Del Dolemonte on March 7, 2010 at 4:50 PM

Let’s hope the Pakistanis try and shoot him expeditiously.

Schadenfreude on March 7, 2010 at 4:50 PM

I think a tragic accident should befall him.

JoeySlippers on March 7, 2010 at 4:51 PM

Where to try Gadahn?

In hell. Our job is to extradite him there, asap.

Blake on March 7, 2010 at 4:52 PM

I hope they “torture” him with 48 straight hours by blasting “I Will Survive” by Gloria Gaynor at him.

Or maybe “Feelings” by Morris Albert.

badtemper on March 7, 2010 at 4:52 PM

You mean have him interrogated by the High Value Team that doesn’t exist yet in any concrete way?
I would have been much more reassured with this high value capture if Pres Bush and his CIA team of interrogators were still in office and operations than the comfy chair bunch handling national security matters now.

eaglewingz08 on March 7, 2010 at 4:52 PM

I hope they “torture” him with 48 straight hours by blasting “I Will Survive” by Gloria Gaynor at him.

Or maybe “Feelings” by Morris Albert.

badtemper on March 7, 2010 at 4:52 PM

1970s bubblegum music

Wethal on March 7, 2010 at 4:54 PM

I hope they “torture” him with 48 straight hours by blasting “I Will Survive” by Gloria Gaynor at him.

Or maybe “Feelings” by Morris Albert.

badtemper on March 7, 2010 at 4:52 PM

I suggest pulling his tongue out, mm by mm, live, and on TV.

Schadenfreude on March 7, 2010 at 4:56 PM

On a goat hog farm.

lonestar1 on March 7, 2010 at 3:40 PM

FIFY

AZfederalist on March 7, 2010 at 4:59 PM

hope they “torture” him with 48 straight hours by blasting “I Will Survive” by Gloria Gaynor at him.

Or maybe “Feelings” by Morris Albert.

badtemper on March 7, 2010 at 4:52 PM

Barney the purple dinosaur. “I love you. You love me…..”

Wethal on March 7, 2010 at 5:01 PM

I fear that if Gadahn gets to the US he’ll clean up his act, ditch the crazy cleric act and start playing the media with the line about how Bush made him do it. Can you see Olbermann or Moore unequivically condemning him?

On the plus side it puts Obama and Holder in the deliciously akward position of having to either outrage the bulk of the American people or outrage the left.

EnglishMike on March 7, 2010 at 5:02 PM

Let Gadahn face his existing indictment, after intelligence experts get done interrogating him. Treason carries the death penalty, and that should satisfy everyone

He is in Pakistani custody that can’t be fun…I wonder what he has to say for himself now?

Dr Evil on March 7, 2010 at 5:04 PM

Let Gadahn face his existing indictment, after intelligence experts get done interrogating him.

Intelligence experts? I guess that would be Paki “intelligence experts,” because fat bastards like Incompitano and Gadahn always stick together, Ed. Is anyone going to be bewildered when Gadahn is transferred into US custody with Anthony Romero and the ACLU standing right there?

Western_Civ on March 7, 2010 at 5:04 PM

EnglishMike on March 7, 2010 at 5:02 PM

Maybe, some might try, and white wash Gadahn, but face it he made and released so many tapes – his greatest hits if you will. I can see a photo of people jumping from the twin towers, while his greatest hits are playing in a loop…white washing him is an up hill slog – not that it wouldn’t be fun to watch the trail lawyers get his stink on themselves.

Dr Evil on March 7, 2010 at 5:06 PM

Today is a Good Day “It would Be Nice to See an Updated Picture of him in captivity” What kind of shape he is in…did any of his wive(s) get picked up too? If he is living his dream I am assuming there are obedient muslim women involved.

Dr Evil on March 7, 2010 at 5:08 PM

Correct me if I’m mistaken, but I believe it takes about 10-12 years to exhaust all the automatic appeals that come with a death sentence. So we spend a billion bucks on a trial and by the time he’s executed no one remembers who the hell he is.

Let the Pakis cut off his head. All I need is a video on the Internet, ala Saddam Hussein.

RedWinged Blackbird on March 7, 2010 at 5:16 PM

Are there any precedents or grounds for revoking the citizenship of someone who choses to aid, abet and fight alongside enemies of America?

OxyCon on March 7, 2010 at 5:16 PM

What should happen:
1) Let his Muslim brothers in Pock-ee-stan “interrogate” him.
2) Afterwards, transfer him to Gitmo to await military tribunal.
3) Execute him by year’s end.

Mojave Mark on March 7, 2010 at 5:17 PM

I’ll volunteer to have him tried in my backyard. Right next to the walnut tree with the rope hanging from it. Matter of fact, after playing a couple of his You-Tube tapes, the trial will be over. Tops, 10 minutes. Then we hang him. Total cost, about $17.95. Which, no matter how you slice it, is still $17.95 too much.

GarandFan on March 7, 2010 at 5:18 PM

What should happen:
1) Let his Muslim brothers in Pock-ee-stan “interrogate” him.
2) Afterwards, transfer him to Gitmo to await military tribunal.
3) Execute him by year’s end.

Mojave Mark on March 7, 2010 at 5:17 PM

Jose Padilla got a Federal Trail he is an American Citizen who went over to the dark side.

Dr Evil on March 7, 2010 at 5:19 PM

I say if he floats, he’s a witch.

EyeSurgeon on March 7, 2010 at 5:21 PM

RedWinged Blackbird on March 7, 2010 at 5:16 PM

What if he goes to the rocket docket in Virginia?

Eastern District of Virginia: The Rocket Docket – Wiley Rein LLP
The average Rocket Docket case has a life expectancy of only eight months from filing to trial, …. EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA: THE ROCKET DOCKET …

Gadahn sowed the wind now it’s time to reap the whirlwind.

Results 1 – 10 of about 35,900 for sow the wind reap the whirlwind. (0.26 seconds)
Search Results

Hosea 8:7 “They sow the wind and reap the whirlwind. The stalk has …
For they sow the wind, and they shall reap the whirlwind. The standing grain has no heads; it shall yield no flour; if it were to yield, strangers would …

Dr Evil on March 7, 2010 at 5:22 PM

How about treason? The constitution is rather explicit in its definition of treason as “aid and comfort to an enemy…”

gryphon202 on March 7, 2010 at 5:28 PM

How about treason? The constitution is rather explicit in its definition of treason as “aid and comfort to an enemy…”

gryphon202 on March 7, 2010 at 5:28 PM

I thought Gadahn charged with Treason in absentia?

Dr Evil on March 7, 2010 at 5:33 PM

Dr. Schadenfreude paging Azam The American.

Paging Azam the American, please pick up the red and black cables located at the customer service desk.

R Square on March 7, 2010 at 5:36 PM

Try him!? Why is this SOB still alive? Take no prisoners!!!

GFW on March 7, 2010 at 5:38 PM

I’m appalled by some of the comments here. Have some respect for the Constitution, guys. The Sixth Amendment clearly applies here.

year_of_the_dingo on March 7, 2010 at 5:39 PM

I thought Gadahn charged with Treason in absentia?

No Dr Evil, he was tried here in the US while he was gone.

Has Absentia even filed charges?

R Square on March 7, 2010 at 5:39 PM

So, does Obama have the stones to charge him with a capital offense???

Blake on March 7, 2010 at 5:39 PM

I don’t see where any sensitive US intelligence would be compromised by a public trial. His statements on videotape were put on the internet! It will not matter how he was captured by the Pakis. We will ask, and I predict the Pakistanis will hand him over, after the bruises go away.

I also predict after he has been in US custody for a while, he will claim the he was tortured.

Pelayo on March 7, 2010 at 5:39 PM

Prison is also possible. The treason statute does not have one punishment only.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/usc_sec_18_00002381—-000-.html

tanarg on March 7, 2010 at 5:40 PM

The Sixth Amendment clearly applies here.

Is that the one with the reload clause?

R Square on March 7, 2010 at 5:40 PM

No one suggested using Bob Dylan’s Christmas album?

xkaydet65 on March 7, 2010 at 5:40 PM

Best of both worlds…

Let Pakistan vigorously interrogate him.

But he doesn’t live through it.

1921 C DRUM on March 7, 2010 at 5:40 PM

Blake on March 7, 2010 at 5:39 PM

it’s not up to the WH to do that. It’s the responsibility of the judicial branch to charge the guy and prosecute him. If sentenced, it’s up to the executive branch to carry out the sentence IIRC?—

ted c on March 7, 2010 at 5:41 PM

How about treason? The constitution is rather explicit in its definition of treason as “aid and comfort to an enemy…”

gryphon202 on March 7, 2010 at 5:28 PM

I thought Gadahn charged with Treason in absentia?

Dr Evil on March 7, 2010 at 5:33 PM

You guys have some reading to do. You might start by reading the post on which you’re commenting. It’s at the top of the page.

RedWinged Blackbird on March 7, 2010 at 5:42 PM

Gadahn has been charged with terrorism for yrs. However, he won’t get sentenced to death here. The last person was back in the early 50s and his sentenced got reduced to life. I just don’t see it. Let the Pakis have him. They will go tougher on him than we will.

di butler on March 7, 2010 at 5:42 PM

I’m glad this fat traitor has been captured (by the Pakistanis, if not us) but I don’t know why people are acting as if this loser was some Al Quaeda mastermind. All he does is make loser videos and cause Westerners to laugh at the pathetic nature of Al Quaeda’s propaganda.

As far as I’m concerned, the Pakistanis need to beat every single bit of information out of this traitor and then just end his miserable existence. If they hand the porker over to us, that will just mean that our CIA personnel will be looking forward to being prosecuted by Holder and his Al Quaeda 7 for some imagined crime … like blowing cigar smoke in the rat-basturd’s face.

neurosculptor on March 7, 2010 at 5:43 PM

Correct me if I’m mistaken, but I believe it takes about 10-12 years to exhaust all the automatic appeals that come with a death sentence.

Timothy McVeigh was the fastest crime to execution I have seen in my lifetime. It can be done. However, McVeigh had no sympathy from anybody, but Gadahn will have plenty of lefties going to bat.

Pelayo on March 7, 2010 at 5:44 PM

Have some respect for the Constitution, guys. The Sixth Amendment clearly applies here.

year_of_the_dingo on March 7, 2010 at 5:39 PM

He’s in Pakistan, you blithering idiot. The US Constitution doesn’t apply to Pakistan. Maybe that’s news to you …

neurosculptor on March 7, 2010 at 5:45 PM

Making anyone listen to Bob Dylan’s Christmas album would constitute a war crime.

1921 C DRUM on March 7, 2010 at 5:46 PM

Article 106a Treason UCMJ

(1) Any person subject to this chapter who, with intent or reason to believe that it is to be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of a foreign nation, communicates, delivers, or transmits, or attempts to communicate, deliver, or transmit, to any entity described in paragraph (2), either directly or indirectly, anything described in paragraph (3) shall be punished as a court-martial may direct, except that if the accused is found guilty of an offense that directly concerns (A) nuclear weaponry, military spacecraft or satellites, early warning systems, or other means of defense or retaliation against large scale attack, (B) war plans, (C) communications intelligence or cryptographic information, or (D) any other major weapons system or major element of defense strategy, the accused shall be punished by death or such other punishment as a court-martial may direct.
(2) An entity referred to in paragraph (1) is—

(A) a foreign government;
(B) a faction or party or military or naval force within a foreign country, whether recognized or unrecognized by the United States; or

(C) a representative, officer, agent, employee, subject, or citizen of such a government, faction, party, or force.

(3) A thing referred to in paragraph (1) is a document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, note, instrument, appliance, or information relating to the national defense.

(b)

(1) No person may be sentenced by court-martial to suffer death for an offense under this section (article) unless—(A) the m bers of the court-martial unanimously find at least one of the aggravating factors set out in subsection (c); and
(B) the members unanimously determine that any extenuating or mitigating circumstances are substantially outweighed by any aggravating circumstances, including the aggravating factors set out under subsection (c).

Military personnel tried under espionage/treason can be sentenced to death–but only in extenuating circumstances. Since this guy isn’t a servicemember, he is unlikely eligible for the death penalty, unless US code warrants such a sentence.

ted c on March 7, 2010 at 5:46 PM

Hang him for treason? Ha. That’ll be the day.

Anyone remember John Walker Linde (sp)? You know? The American guy who joined the Taliban and actually took up arms against the US? AKA Taliban John.

He got 20 years. Period.

Doofus here will probably get about the same limp, relative slap on the wrist.

BowHuntingTexas on March 7, 2010 at 5:47 PM

Release him in the Aussie outback with no food and water.

Crux Australis on March 7, 2010 at 5:48 PM

But, then again, the Rosenbergs were executed for treason in the 1950′s at Sing Sing Prison in NY.

ted c on March 7, 2010 at 5:51 PM

Hang him for treason? Ha. That’ll be the day.

Anyone remember John Walker Linde (sp)? You know? The American guy who joined the Taliban and actually took up arms against the US? AKA Taliban John.

He got 20 years. Period.

Doofus here will probably get about the same limp, relative slap on the wrist.

BowHuntingTexas on March 7, 2010 at 5:47 PM

Yeah, but JWL was an AQ member back pre-911. Moreover, he was a doofus. This guy joined post-911.

ted c on March 7, 2010 at 5:52 PM

Yeah, but JWL was an AQ member back pre-911. Moreover, he was a doofus. This guy joined post-911.

ted c on March 7, 2010 at 5:52 PM

Lynde still should have gotten treason and death. He knew that he was fighting against America. The Bush DOJ really screwed that one up. Of course, there were a couple of other “Americans” that the Bush DOJ refused to prosecute as traitors. But, then, Bush refused to go after the WaPo or NYSlimes for their espionage, either (whether the cases would have been won was of no consequence).

neurosculptor on March 7, 2010 at 5:58 PM

Release him in the Aussie outback with no food and water.

Crux Australis on March 7, 2010 at 5:48 PM

I doubt if the flabby wimp could survive for 10 days in a typical WMA (Wildlife Management Area – That’s where we gun-totin’ rednecks go to slaughter helpless little animals).

RedWinged Blackbird on March 7, 2010 at 5:59 PM

Let’s face it, all Azam the American is going to get is a personalized invitation to the next White House State Dinner! Heck, he’ll probably get to sit at Obama’s table!!!

Vntnrse on March 7, 2010 at 6:05 PM

Vntnrse at 6:05: Further to your thought, Gadhan could be a featured guest at Obama’s muslim entrepreneuers’ gathering.

GaltBlvnAtty on March 7, 2010 at 6:20 PM

One of the Tokyo Rose’s was tried in federal court for treason, with a conviction:

But this guy should swing afterwards.

rbj on March 7, 2010 at 4:44 PM

Thank heavens they didn’t execute Toguri. She was innocent. She refused to renounce her US Citizenship, aided the POWs every way she could with material goods purchased on her meager salary, and (per all the POWs who “served” with her), tried to sabotage her own program every way she could. In the end, she was convicted on the testimony of two ex-Japanese Americans who had renounced their US Citizenship at the outset of the war; the two had been threatened by the FBI with a treason charge if they didn’t “cooperate” — a threat the FBI was powerless to enforce because they had legally renounced their citizenship. They testified against Toguri with that empty (but real to them) threat held against their backs. Nearly a dozen US and Australian servicemen attempted to intervene in the case on her behalf but were rebuffed.

The only way she could have been tried for treason was if she remained an American citizen. She suffered horribly for that steadfastness. The Government fined her $10,000, stripped her of her citizenship, sent her to prison, and, upon her release, attempted to deport her; she won by claiming that (a) she was natural born, and (b) had never renounced her citizenship. Of course, it could only be expected of a person who was born on the 4th of July and who, on the day she was stripped of her citizenship, was still a Republican.

unclesmrgol on March 7, 2010 at 6:24 PM

He’s in Pakistan, you blithering idiot. The US Constitution doesn’t apply to Pakistan. Maybe that’s news to you …

And what kind of patriot are you when you favor extrajudicial treatment by a rogue, half-Islamist state over the US Constitution? The crime of treason arguably ranks as the worst in the catalog of human treacheries. Justice demands that he faces retribution here, at the hands of those whom he betrayed. I’m genuinely flabbergasted that you’d want to outsource vengeance that’s rightful ours to a foreign country.

year_of_the_dingo on March 7, 2010 at 6:28 PM

And what kind of patriot are you when you favor extrajudicial treatment by a rogue, half-Islamist state over the US Constitution?

Huh? He put himself in Pakistan. If you think that bringing him back here, to be treated with kid gloves is “being a patriot”, then you are just stupid.

The crime of treason arguably ranks as the worst in the catalog of human treacheries. Justice demands that he faces retribution here, at the hands of those whom he betrayed.

LOL. Face justice here for treason? You’re killing me. Which of the Al Quaeda 7 do you think will be handling that case? I’d rather have the Pakistanis give him what he deserves.

I’m genuinely flabbergasted that you’d want to outsource vengeance that’s rightful ours to a foreign country.

year_of_the_dingo on March 7, 2010 at 6:28 PM

Where have you been living? Do you not understand what the US is about these days? We investigate and look to prosecute our own personnel if they do something as “awful” as blowing smoke in a poor little jihadi’s face. What sort of person are you that you want to put our people at risk for some twisted sense of “extra-territorial Constitutionality”? I want to see justice done, and that definitely won’t happen if he’s brought back here. Try and take a look at who’s running things in the US, now.

neurosculptor on March 7, 2010 at 6:35 PM

I trust the Pakistani’s are doing a little more with this guy than what got Lt.Col. West into trouble.

GaltBlvnAtty on March 7, 2010 at 6:50 PM

I’m baffled by the resistance of some to a treason trial in a US court. A high-profile trial would help revive a part of the Law that I think is seriously underused. Treason is the only crime that’s explicitly defined in the Constitution. Over the years, there are many instances where Leftists had crossed the line. Jane Fonda should have been charged with treason. Lynne Stewart (lawyer for blind sheik) should have been charge with treason. John Walker Lindh should have been treason. Part of the reason, I think, of prosecutors unwilling to pursue such a course is because they’re unfamiliar with it and hence uncomfortable. A crime of “providing material aid to terrorists” sounds technocratic and modern, whereas treason has a large moral dimension. In the western tradition, betrayal of one’s own community is the worst transgression of all. Perpetrators end up in the last circle of Hell, compared to those who merely practice violence, who languish in the seventh. That the weight of the crime depends largely on moral judgement is discomforting in an age where we think the Law serves mainly a utilitarian purpose. But if we as a society cannot articulate our moral values, how can our civilization survive?

year_of_the_dingo on March 7, 2010 at 7:16 PM

it’s not up to the WH to do that. It’s the responsibility of the judicial branch to charge the guy and prosecute him. If sentenced, it’s up to the executive branch to carry out the sentence IIRC?—

ted c on March 7, 2010 at 5:41 PM

Of course, it’s up to the Whitehouse. You don’t think the AG is influenced by the WH? And why have people been going on and on about where these terrorists will be tried? Gitmo. NYC. Now Gitmo. You don’t think Obama hasn’t had a hand in it?

And ultimately, it is the president who signs the death warrant.

Blake on March 7, 2010 at 7:18 PM

Try him on television in front of Judge Judy. Good tv and she will kick his ass. Of course the $5000 limit might kind of suck, but at least his family will be embarassed.

cat-scratch on March 7, 2010 at 7:43 PM

Huh? He put himself in Pakistan. If you think that bringing him back here, to be treated with kid gloves is “being a patriot”, then you are just stupid.

So you’re in favor of foreign governments denying American citizens of rights under international laws? Gee, thanks a lot!

It’s not even clear if Gadahn has broken any Pakistani law. There’re plenty of propagandists in that country openly supporting Al Qaeda. Indeed, they exist all around the world. Though they are our enemies, do we try to eliminate everyone of them? No, as usually it isn’t worthwhile. But the case of Gadahn is special. He isn’t just an enemy, he is a traitor. If we’re not going to try him for treason, what’s the point of his capture? So we stopped him from appearing in more videos, great. The man is a criminal in view of US law and the law must be followed. What you call kid gloves is our Bill of Rights.

Where have you been living? Do you not understand what the US is about these days? We investigate and look to prosecute our own personnel if they do something as “awful” as blowing smoke in a poor little jihadi’s face.

And thank god we have our constitution. Without its protection our warriors wouldn’t merely be investigated, they would already have been thrown into jails–if not worse. Giving a thuggish administration a license to be a thug is highly illogical.

year_of_the_dingo on March 7, 2010 at 8:08 PM

Where to try Gadahn?

Oh, I know! Oz.

TheBigOldDog on March 7, 2010 at 8:09 PM

So you’re in favor of foreign governments denying American citizens of rights under international laws? Gee, thanks a lot!

There’s no such thing as “international law”. You would do well to understand that.

It’s not even clear if Gadahn has broken any Pakistani law. There’re plenty of propagandists in that country openly supporting Al Qaeda. Indeed, they exist all around the world. Though they are our enemies, do we try to eliminate everyone of them? No, as usually it isn’t worthwhile. But the case of Gadahn is special. He isn’t just an enemy, he is a traitor. If we’re not going to try him for treason, what’s the point of his capture? So we stopped him from appearing in more videos, great. The man is a criminal in view of US law and the law must be followed. What you call kid gloves is our Bill of Rights.

You’re kind of nuts, you know.

And thank god we have our constitution. Without its protection our warriors wouldn’t merely be investigated, they would already have been thrown into jails–if not worse. Giving a thuggish administration a license to be a thug is highly illogical.

year_of_the_dingo on March 7, 2010 at 8:08 PM

I thought you were all hot and bothered about violation of some illusory “international law” just above? Now, you’re on about the Constitution, when you know that the slime will never see a treason trial if he’s brought here?

I’d have preferred to have a hit team out there who had taken him, milked him for all info, and then did away with him – unceremoniously. That’s the way nations used to handle these sorts of traitors. You want some show trial … great. I’d rather have the Pakistanis deal with the one they have and reserve a trial, here, for Holder. If that comes up on the screen, let me know.

And I would recommend you not mention “international law” again in your pleadings, since there is no such thing – even though lawyers and would-be lawyers like to lie and use that term.

neurosculptor on March 7, 2010 at 8:17 PM

Let him be tried under Sharia law, where he can be hanged or stoned to death without much fuss.

Philly on March 7, 2010 at 9:05 PM

How do you say ‘Miranda’ in Urdu?

Khun Joe on March 7, 2010 at 11:32 PM

“Jury of his peers.”
DETROIT!

Cybergeezer on March 8, 2010 at 8:52 AM

Comment pages: 1 2