Quotes of the day
posted at 9:26 pm on March 6, 2010 by Allahpundit
“Mr. Axelrod said he accepts some blame for what he called ‘communication failures,’ though he acknowledges bafflement that the administration’s efforts to stimulate the economy in a crisis, overhaul health care and prosecute two wars have been so routinely framed by opponents as the handiwork of a big-government, soft-on-terrorism, politics-of-the-past ideologue.
“‘For me, the question is, why haven’t we broken through more than we have?’ Mr. Axelrod said. ‘Why haven’t we broken through?’…
“In a lengthy interview in his office on Wednesday, Mr. Axelrod was often defiant, saying he did not give a ‘flying’ expletive ‘about what the peanut gallery thinks’ and did not live for the approval ‘of the political community.’ He denounced the ‘rampant lack of responsibility’ of people in Washington who refuse to solve problems, and cited the difficulty of trying to communicate through what he calls ‘the dirty filter’ of a city suffused with the ‘every day is Election Day sort of mentality.’
“When asked how he would assess his performance, Mr. Axelrod shrugged. ‘I’m not going to judge myself on that score,’ he said. But then he shot back: ‘Have I succeeded in reversing a 30-year trend of skepticism and cynicism about government? I confess that I have not. Maybe next year.’”
***
“A little humility would be nice. So would a sense that he answers to the public rather than to some self-proclaimed (and self-determined) imperative of history and/or call of destiny. What Obama seems to fail to understand is that his own, overblown self-assurance and self-mythologizing is actually hampering his own goals. One need not stretch too far to observe that one of the factors adding to public opposition to Obamacare is a growing public disquietude about the lack of responsiveness, the authoritarian certitude, and the zealous near-fanaticism of the government that would run the new health-rationing system — all character traits as embodied by the president himself…
“And it’s not just on health care. They work against public opinion on matters of criminal justice, terrorist treatment, race preferences, bank bailouts and corporate takeovers, overall spending, domestic welfare requirements, fossil fuel development, missile defenses, advocacy of American interests (and pride!) abroad, and on the whole panoply of oft-unstated attitudes that cohere as American exceptionalism.
“This is not the way the system is supposed to work. This is not the American government we grew up with. This is not the national ethos that we love.”
***
“Republicans seem to have difficulty grasping this basic dynamic. Less than three months ago, they were stunned at the way the Democrats managed to get 60 senators to vote for the health bill. Then Scott Brown took them back down to 59, and Republicans were again stunned to find the Dems talking about ramming this thing into law through the parliamentary device of ‘reconciliation.’ And, when polls showed an ever larger number of Americans ever more opposed to Obamacare (by margins approaching three-to-one), Republicans were further stunned to discover that, in order to advance ‘reconciliation,’ Democrat reconsiglieres had apparently been offering (illegally) various cosy Big Government sinecures to swing-state congressmen in order to induce them to climb into the cockpit for the kamikaze raid to push the bill through. The Democrats understand that politics is not just about Tuesday evenings every other November, but about everything else, too…
“Look at it from the Dems’ point of view. You pass Obamacare. You lose the 2010 election, which gives the GOP co-ownership of an awkward couple of years. And you come back in 2012 to find your health care apparatus is still in place, a fetid behemoth of toxic pustules oozing all over the basement, and, simply through the natural processes of government, already bigger and more expensive and more bureaucratic than it was when you passed it two years earlier. That’s a huge prize, and well worth a midterm timeout…
“[G]overnment health care is not about health care, it’s about government. Once you look at it that way, what the Dems are doing makes perfect sense. For them.”










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3
tigerlily: I agree with your thoughts. Too bad this thread is falling away. I am looking for a thread that picks up on the question of what We The People really can do when we, collectively, pass an inflection point with respect to what “our government” is doing to us and our cherished nation. We should be discussing options. Someone could suggest, for example, that millions of taxpayers refuse to pay their federal taxes. There are likely to be other suggestions out there as well.
GaltBlvnAtty on March 7, 2010 at 2:19 PM
Guess i would have to grow a mustache to be a “mustachioed
message maven”.
Been there, done that.
Wife prefers the clean shaven look.
gstep58 on March 7, 2010 at 4:20 PM
Rush did not invent the term “managed decline”. I think it would be fair to say that this is the Obama Doctrine.
Buy Danish on March 7, 2010 at 4:25 PM
Oh yeah it is. When has any protest brought out patriots by the thousands as with the TEA Parties? Not in my lifetime.
Independent here. From what I’ve had to endure of these Democrats, I will not vote for a Democrat again. Not for dog catcher, school board, city council, mayor, state rep, state senate, or any national seat.
Dems now have an enemy for life in me.
Long live the second TEA revolution.
shades_of_gasden on March 7, 2010 at 5:34 PM
Oh, look at the polls, chump. It’s not happening for you, or The One.
Vyce on March 7, 2010 at 6:04 PM
Keemo and Shades: My concern is that the November elections will demonstrate the American people’s rejection of all that Obama has been doing, but that Obama goes ahead after that by administrative action and executive order, pushing his agenda. He can do a lot, especially if not restrained by veto-overriding Republican majorities in both houses of congress. What then?
GaltBlvnAtty on March 7, 2010 at 6:06 PM
It’s about establishing an unbreakable aristocracy. Like all socialist schemes and the men that spearhead them, the only goal is the ossification of social strata. Keep the grubby commoners in their place. Cripple upward mobility. Kill the individual.
Call it a caste system, call it feudalism, call it Marxism, call it Soviet communism, call it “social justice”, call it whatever you will; it’s all the same.
Slavery.
spmat on March 7, 2010 at 6:28 PM
The skepticism goes back about 250 years, and is, afterall, the point of the excersise we call America…and the reason it has worked up to now.
Stupid or Evil?
Empiricist on March 7, 2010 at 6:37 PM
Hear you, but Obama’s admin action and executive orders don’t easily become LAW without both houses of congress dominated by Dems. House of Reps goes GOP and Obama loses half his power. Both Senate and GOP go GOP (unlikely but maybe) and Obama becomes checked into lame duck status.
Hence their efforts to shove as much socialist crap down our throats as possible before November.
And you will see challenges to those actions and orders if the GOP gets enough fight in it from the elections. Even now you see a somewhat bipartisan (gasp) effort to thwart the CO2 / EPA regulation overreach.
shades_of_gasden on March 7, 2010 at 7:25 PM
The more they push before November, the worse November will be for them. After that, with Obama, I think all bets are off: I doubt he will go quietly into a lame duck administration.
GaltBlvnAtty on March 7, 2010 at 9:14 PM
Executive orders become law the minute Obama signs them. Congress has zero say in EO’s.
The only way to eliminate an EO is to either eliminate the agency charged with carrying it out, or to get a new president who signs a new EO canceling out the previous EO.
MarkTheGreat on March 8, 2010 at 9:16 AM
For many of the early years, individual banks issued their own currency.
In many ways, they still do.
It can be argued that the old S&H green stamps were a form of currency.
MarkTheGreat on March 8, 2010 at 9:22 AM
Why do you so consistently feel the need to lie about things that are so easily checked?
A bare majority of those voted, voted for Obama. (Assuming that the votes of the dead and people who never existed actually count. And also considering that absentee ballots are usually not counted if there are not enough of them in that district to affect the outcome.)
Now considering that those who are registered to vote are barely half of all Americans, that means that only about 1 in 4 of all Americans, voted for Obama. Hardly the majority you fantasize about.
MarkTheGreat on March 8, 2010 at 9:29 AM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3