Media pretty excited about Palin’s new “reality show”
posted at 8:06 pm on March 4, 2010 by Allahpundit
A nice example of how the press’s desire to believe the worst about Palin leads them to get things wrong. Step one: The Hollywood Reporter reports that she’s working on a “Planet Earth”-type documentary about Alaska for which cameras will follow her and her family around. Step two: Media outlets like Reuters pick up the news of a “reality show,” leading sites like Mediaite to wet their pants at the thought of the right’s blue-collar hero appearing in the sort of garish, low-rent, “Osbournes”-esque spectacle they’ve always imagined for her. Step three: The truth comes out.
The former governor, Mark Burnett (“Survivor,” “Expedition Africa,” “Eco-Challenge”) and Robert Barnett are in L.A. this week meeting with network heads about a documentary about Alaska. A source close to Palin says it is NOT a reality show of any sort, and NOT about her family, as some Hollywood media have speculated. It is about the people, geography, wildlife and wonders of Alaska. The source reports “great interest” in it from the nets. Meetings are yesterday and today with SIX networks.
In other words, it’s a “reality show” the way National Geographic specials are “reality shows.” Meanwhile, there’s a new scandal brewing: She and her chillbilly hordes descended upon an Oscar gift suite “like locusts,” grabbing everything their grubby little hick hands could handle. That’s step two of the scandal; step three is that she made a $1,700 donation to the Red Cross while she was there and, according to Andrew Malcolm of the LA Times, donated the swag she picked up to charity. As for the accusation that she wouldn’t let anyone on the scene take her picture, see C4P about that.
The exit question on everyone’s mind: What’s gotten into Juan Williams?
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »
If Palin’s irrelevance becomes any more irrelevant then she is going to be mighty irrelevant in her irrelevance.
Bishop on March 4, 2010 at 8:10 PM
BTW, who is in charge of drudge today?
1st, they put this story up on there with “reality tv show”… and then removed it like an hour afterwards… and then they put up the John Roberts rumor from Radaronline… and removed that like an hour afterwards…
ninjapirate on March 4, 2010 at 8:10 PM
Just saw an ad that Obozo is going to be on America’s Most Wanted this weekend.
txag92 on March 4, 2010 at 8:12 PM
Anyway, why don’t they do this with all states? Why just Alaska?
ninjapirate on March 4, 2010 at 8:12 PM
unprecedented!
upinak on March 4, 2010 at 8:12 PM
OT – well, I’ll make it on topic. Put her show on in place of Bill Oh’s. He’s unwatchable. Even interviewing two pro-ObamaCare Democrat Representatives he’ll have you cheering for them. (synopsis: “I have youz guyz on to explain this bill. I don’t understand it! But I have youz guyz on because we are smart. Not like those Sanchez sisters in Congress. Youz guyz are smart. We’re smarter. I don’t understand this bill!”)
Marcus on March 4, 2010 at 8:13 PM
Whew. What I heard yesterday didn’t fit my pattern of expectation, and I was thinking ‘oh noes’. Thanks for posting about this. Nice touch with RC donation, natch. Kid’s got class.
Spirit of 1776 on March 4, 2010 at 8:14 PM
First episode she shows us her birth certificate. And her college transcripts. And her picture in her college yearbook.
Akzed on March 4, 2010 at 8:14 PM
Why? Who can afford to go to Alaska anymore?
Why not try living here so I can here you complain about it as well. BTW gas 3.29 a gallon in Anchorage. Milk, one gallon 4.99 on sale. Meat… should I even go there? Eggs 3.99 for a dozen eggs.
upinak on March 4, 2010 at 8:14 PM
I’m not really sure about this….but she knows what she is doing.
This being said…….is she the Princess Diana of American Politics or Ronald Reagan without the dress? Time will tell.
She is definitely the Anti-Obama.
PappyD61 on March 4, 2010 at 8:15 PM
He`s just p***ed that his guy Obama has been such a failure.
ThePrez on March 4, 2010 at 8:15 PM
Nothing has gotten into Juan Williams. He’s a liberal prick, he’s always been one. That’s like asking ‘what’s gotten into Nancy Pelosi’?
joejm65 on March 4, 2010 at 8:16 PM
Seems Juan is getting a little testy in defense of Obama lately. Hannity and SE Cupp were getting him pretty frustrated trying to discuss Sarah without comparing Obama’s failures and Sarah’s accomplishments.
fourdeucer on March 4, 2010 at 8:16 PM
Allah,
Did you just defend Palin? There’s hope for you yet.
taney71 on March 4, 2010 at 8:16 PM
Juan Williams is a minority leftist. That gets him a free pass to say anything.
Buford Gooch on March 4, 2010 at 8:17 PM
Lying liars. Today she’s their white trash, tomorrow a bimbo, the next day an inarticulate hick from the sticks. Make up your minds liberals!
I think this picture of Palin is what makes them go bonkers. A Conservative, pro-life woman in her mid-40s who can look that good in a pencil skirt and black high-heeled boots while pushing her toddler in a stroller with a smile on her face? Game over.
conservative pilgrim on March 4, 2010 at 8:18 PM
1) You can hunt moose for meat.
2) The media will lay some whopper eggs for you Alaskans
3) I’ll send a troll up there for you to milk *mmm mmm mmm troll-milk*
:P
MeatHeadinCA on March 4, 2010 at 8:19 PM
Very disappointed in Juan….he’s one of my favorite liberals!
terryannonline on March 4, 2010 at 8:19 PM
Thank Goodness she is the ANTI obama we need a congress full of anti Obama, anti Pelosi, Anti Rangel ect.ect.
Gracelynn on March 4, 2010 at 8:19 PM
Lefties are always pretty frustrated…
MeatHeadinCA on March 4, 2010 at 8:20 PM
send me cheaper gas!
upinak on March 4, 2010 at 8:21 PM
I’ve defended her before and will do so again. I don’t criticize anyone just to criticize them.
Allahpundit on March 4, 2010 at 8:21 PM
I heard Juan on the radio the other day on Hannity. He’s lost it. That British guy on FBN (name?) made great points on why Obama’s economic policies are disastrous. Juan would agree with the guy and then return to his talking points defending Obama. He made no sense. Was really embarrassing.
conservative pilgrim on March 4, 2010 at 8:21 PM
I’ve heard Bawney Fwank has some err gas… are you sure you want me to send him up there?
MeatHeadinCA on March 4, 2010 at 8:22 PM
hahahahah… Juan sends this to you…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=66MrrIm9SFI
ninjapirate on March 4, 2010 at 8:22 PM
That was uncharacteristically (from what I’ve seen) shallow of Juan. But he hit all of JetBoy’s points :)
Spirit of 1776 on March 4, 2010 at 8:22 PM
Ninja–ugh, no thanks. Juan can keep it. I’m a happily married heterosexual female.
conservative pilgrim on March 4, 2010 at 8:23 PM
The name of this documentary: “How to Hunt Liberals (on facebook)”
MeatHeadinCA on March 4, 2010 at 8:25 PM
AP–thanks for wrapping up all the craziness of these stories in one post. Between these two and the Radar story about Roberts, it’s been a crazy news cycle day.
conservative pilgrim on March 4, 2010 at 8:25 PM
Oddly enough my comment from the headline is still appropriate here…..
Cindy Munford on March 4, 2010 at 8:26 PM
shhhh I am trying to keep the riff raff hippie squatters out!
upinak on March 4, 2010 at 8:27 PM
Next Lame Stream Headline …
Palin backs out of Reality Show”
HondaV65 on March 4, 2010 at 8:29 PM
I know. I just kid.
taney71 on March 4, 2010 at 8:29 PM
LOL. Sorry, but a couple of weeks ago S.E. Cupp was dressed in a slutty catholic school girl prostitute outfit. I’m kind of wondering about the double standard there. NO ONE denies McCain picked Palin because he thought she would be attractive to most (and many seem to think she is). You’re delusional if you think he picked her for her substance. She would still be governor of Alaska and probably little else if McCain hadn’t tapped her…so yeah, she’s successful (in the nominal way that she is) because she’s attractive.
TheBlueSite on March 4, 2010 at 8:29 PM
If anyone does a reality show it’s gonna be the Edwards-love-triangle. Al Gore would make guest appearances.
MeatHeadinCA on March 4, 2010 at 8:30 PM
Oh good, good point. I hadn’t considered that.
Spirit of 1776 on March 4, 2010 at 8:31 PM
She definately looks good in animal clothing too.
fourdeucer on March 4, 2010 at 8:31 PM
Heck. It didn’t take but 20 seconds to find a comment proving Juan Williams’ point!
I see comments like this all the time here. “She’s so hot!” “What a MILF!” “No one looks better in a skirt!”
She’d be a nobody if she wasn’t ‘attractive.’
TheBlueSite on March 4, 2010 at 8:31 PM
Hehehe. My attractive, successful wife would like to have a word with you, that is if you are still able to speak after she breaks every bone in your chauvinistic body.
Bishop on March 4, 2010 at 8:32 PM
Save that image… You’ll need it.
You forgot to call us racist and homophobic.
Huh?
MeatHeadinCA on March 4, 2010 at 8:33 PM
He picked her because a great many conservatives despised him as the Weasel King who had constantly backstabbed conservatives any chance he got. Sarah Palin helped him with them a great deal.
That she is attractive is not exactly a shocker as a great many politicians tend to be.
sharrukin on March 4, 2010 at 8:33 PM
No, she’d probably be a bitter, control-freak Democrat.
MeatHeadinCA on March 4, 2010 at 8:33 PM
The Titanic is going down and he KNOWS it. No longer will historians struggle to identify the worst President in American history. James Buchanan and James Earl Carter won’t even be anywhere close. Like Hannity says, BHO is hands down The.Worst.President.EVAH…Evah…evah…
Like many others, Juan pinned ALL of his hopes on The Most Colossal Failure in the history of the American Presidency. You’re going to see a WHOLE LOT of totally irrational arguments, just like this one, coming from liberals (and from the independents that voted for Obama) for quite some time to come.
My collie says:
CyberCipher on March 4, 2010 at 8:34 PM
I realize the media wants to assume the worst about Palin, but they had to try to get this one wrong. The article I read even used the words “Planet Earth” to describe the type of documentary she wanted to do about Alaska. Even if you’ve never see that series(it looks fantastic on Blu-ray incidentally), if these morons would research for 5 seconds, they’d understand that David Attenborough is about as far removed from the Osbournes or The Hills as humanly possible.
Now certainly it’s possible that Palin and her family will appear in the documentary. What better way to guarantee ratings? But the focus sounds like it’ll be strictly on nature and not their personal lives.
Doughboy on March 4, 2010 at 8:34 PM
And we shall have it come November.
John the Libertarian on March 4, 2010 at 8:34 PM
Less than 24 hours after Palin tells Leno how lies travel half way around the world before the truth gets out proves correct.
I do believe she is followed and obsessed over more than Princess Diana was.
The media just can’t quit her!
lonestar1 on March 4, 2010 at 8:35 PM
The way the gossip rags portrayed the infamous swag attack it was almost a cross between a Goodfellas hijacking and Christopher Moltisanti meets Ben Kingsley on the Sopranos. The fact none of it was true doesn’t matter. It’s now part of the “official” record.
JammieWearingFool on March 4, 2010 at 8:36 PM
Please, do those people seem like they would go where it’s that cold? First, their dope might freeze. Second what fun is it not to bathe when you have to wear so many layers of clothes that no one notices?
Cindy Munford on March 4, 2010 at 8:36 PM
Um, Andrew Malcolm isn’t saying the swag was donated. He is saying that he was told it was donated. Until this definitely reported, she is going to get no benefit of the doubt.
Speedwagon82 on March 4, 2010 at 8:36 PM
Governor Palin said she would continue advocating for Alaska, and promoting it’s best interest, even after stepping down from Governorship. And that’s what she’s doing.
As for the Suite, the Suite itself invited Governor Palin to it for a photo op. And yes, everything was donated back to the suite for an auction–if you notice in the pictures, she signed several pieces.
Enoxo on March 4, 2010 at 8:37 PM
Ya know, you could walk into an empty room, utter “Palin” and watch the liberal rumor mill take it and run with it to extremes that make sane people shudder.
Bishop on March 4, 2010 at 8:37 PM
Are you guys seriously going to argue he picked her for substance?? You’re out of your minds. I’ve never seen adoration of a public figure so strong that people are willing to just turn off their brains and ignore what’s in front of their eyes. OF COURSE he picked her because she’s an attractive female. It was identity politics at its finest.
And how is that chauvunist? That’s not what that word means, I can assure you. I don’t agree with McCain’s pick. I thought it was lame and dumb, but yes he did pick her because she was younger, female, and attractive.
Denying it is great and all, but it’s like hoping santa claus really exists. It’s just pointless wishful thinking.
TheBlueSite on March 4, 2010 at 8:38 PM
You must have slept through the last election cycle.
Spirit of 1776 on March 4, 2010 at 8:39 PM
In response to Juan Williams’ astonishment that Palin is/could be as smart as Obama: Sometimes the most educated people are the dumbest people in the world because they are not in touch with the pulse of country. Palin is/Obama is not.
Mallard T. Drake on March 4, 2010 at 8:41 PM
Spirit of 1776 on March 4, 2010 at 8:39 PM
Yeah. Which is what I always argue. Obama and Palin followers are much alike.
I consider the die hard, support either candidate no matter what people cultists on both sides.
TheBlueSite on March 4, 2010 at 8:41 PM
This is a perfect example of what makes liberals so endearing. First, they are svengalis who claim to read the minds of others; then they project the nastiest, darkest and most cynical motives onto them; and last, they call anyone who disagrees with said ESP as “delusional” or “stupid” or some other name.
John the Libertarian on March 4, 2010 at 8:42 PM
Uh, the suite issued a press release that said she donated it back to the suit for a charity–after signing some pieces. Are you saying the suite is lying for Governor Palin?
Enoxo on March 4, 2010 at 8:42 PM
Television itself has now become irrelevant.
Cicero43 on March 4, 2010 at 8:42 PM
How would you like to live a life with zero margin for error. That’s Sarah Palin. She cannot make a single mistake, faux pas or blunder in her life. She is tracked 24 hours a day by a roving, remorseless electronic legion of Torquemadas. Even when she does nothing wrong, they contrive ways to goose a news cycle with glib rumor of some outrage. They never retract or apologize, or suffer their own embarrassment or censure, but simply take up the quest for destruction where they left off.
She must have nerves of steel.
rrpjr on March 4, 2010 at 8:43 PM
Palin was picked because she was solid on the pro-life stuff and no segment of the Republican Party actively hated her. Her good looks weren’t even that much of a benefit since they made ugly women hate McCain even more for picking her.
Speedwagon82 on March 4, 2010 at 8:45 PM
Are you going to seriously argue the DNC picked Obama for his substance?? Your out of your mind. I’ve never seen adoration of a public figure so strong that people are willing to just turn off their brains and ignore what’s in front of their eyes. Of Course, the DNC picked him because he’s a “well-spoken, light-skinned black male. It was identity politics at its finest!
lonestar1 on March 4, 2010 at 8:46 PM
Here is where I think your assertion falls apart: Obama is always going to have support from the ‘redistribution of wealth’ crowd. But he’s bleeding support from everyone else that voted for him, because he [basically] lied to them. A kinder way of putting it would be that he is extremely malleable in language and in dead to the moment.
Palin, on the other hand will only be gaining support because her core ideological supporters are already with her. If her appeal was physical, her numbers would be higher then they are because ideological + attractive > ideological. Her support is mostly political, and I think therefore has no where to go but either stay same or go up. Complete opposite of where Obama was in ’08.
Spirit of 1776 on March 4, 2010 at 8:46 PM
Not so fast. You need to explain this comment of yours first.
Bishop on March 4, 2010 at 8:48 PM
I think McCain thought, “Oh, she’s like me, a maverick!” And picked her. I don’t it was much deeper then that. Obviously she came with some tremendous positives, and some exploitable negatives.
Spirit of 1776 on March 4, 2010 at 8:49 PM
“He walks into a room and you want to follow him somewhere, anywhere,” George Clooney told talk show host Charlie Rose.
“I’ll do whatever he says to do,” actress Halle Berry said to the Philadelphia Daily News. “I’ll collect paper cups off the ground to make his pathway clear.”
And..”I so love what he stands for and respect him so much that when I met him, I was a bit shaky.”
“My heart belongs to Barack, and that is who I am currently, finally, engaged to.” Scarlett Johansson
What you are suffering from is called ‘projection‘.
sharrukin on March 4, 2010 at 8:49 PM
Burnett comes up with yet another extremely savvy development idea.
It’s no wonder the guy’s a multi-millionaire.
The Ugly American on March 4, 2010 at 8:49 PM
Well, tell ya what, sport. If I had a dog half as ugly as the Fem-Dems in office, I’d shave its ass and make it walk backwards.
Hal on March 4, 2010 at 8:49 PM
Ah the irony of Alaskans having to pay out the nose to fuel their vehicles when they’re sitting on gajillions of cubic tons of oil and gas. Wouldn’t it be so cool if we could drill for our own resources?
NoLeftTurn on March 4, 2010 at 8:52 PM
Ever read Drop City by T.C. Boyle? Lots of ideas.
katy the mean old lady on March 4, 2010 at 8:54 PM
Gotta give you credit a on a sensible Palin post Allah.
As for the Frumian/Beta Males around here who discriminate against Palin because she’s attractive, lighten the hell up. It’s actually nice to have a strong, accomplished, conservative voice out there who’s easy on the eyes. There’s nothing wrong with that. Yeeesh.
Dongemaharu on March 4, 2010 at 8:57 PM
Tapped her as VP. Not tapped her in that manner.
I cant read McCain’s mind, but after her embarrassing and disastrous intro. to the nation, you can only conclude her looks were the overriding factor.
Like I said, I see comments ALL the time about how hot Palin is, how guy A and B would love to be with her, marry me, MILF, etc etc. The fact that that is the first thing out of the mouth of so many says a lot. Maverick, she hardly was. Conservative in Alaska- I mean, I know that’s a tough situation to be in, but really now. Come on.
TheBlueSite on March 4, 2010 at 8:57 PM
+10 Amen to that Brother!
sarahpalinfan99 on March 4, 2010 at 8:57 PM
Sarah Palin is a very attractive woman, unlike many liberals in politics. Tell me–what do you think of Hillary Clinton? Janet Reno? Michelle Bachmann? Condi Rice? Kathleen Sebelius? Nancy Pelosi? What about John Edwards?
Attractive people do well, nobody is denying that (well, they shouldn’t). Looks help in other professions, but that only goes so far in politics. But for you to glibly say that Palin has achieved her successes only because of her looks says more about you and how you feel about smart, strong woman who also happen to be attractive.
conservative pilgrim on March 4, 2010 at 8:58 PM
See, it applies to Obama. Maybe even more so, since he was also the token Black and a totally unaccomplished leader. The myth of his intellect has been revealed. He was was chosen by the PTB in the Dem party for the very reasons you gave for Palin.
Deanna on March 4, 2010 at 8:59 PM
Don’t forget this gem from Brooks:
conservative pilgrim on March 4, 2010 at 9:01 PM
People say the same about Megyn Kelly. That doesn’t mean she can’t do her job rather well.
Unlike Democrats, conservatives can walk and chew gum at the same time!
We also don’t treat women like garbage. Recall the ‘Bros before hoes’ campaign aimed at Hillary Clinton.
sharrukin on March 4, 2010 at 9:01 PM
So a couple morons obsess over her looks? You can find the same thing on Daily Kos about Obummer and Michelle. Thats not why they are supporting her. They really believe her homespun hockey mom wisdom is vitally needed in the White House.
Speedwagon82 on March 4, 2010 at 9:01 PM
LOL
Del Dolemonte on March 4, 2010 at 9:03 PM
I recall similar comments about JFK and RFK. And many of the younger women I talk to say the same thing about Obama. So what’s your point again?
Deanna on March 4, 2010 at 9:03 PM
I cannot understand how any male of a heterosexual nature could publically say something like that!
sharrukin on March 4, 2010 at 9:03 PM
FIFY
joejm65 on March 4, 2010 at 9:04 PM
And even more out here in Bristol Bay. $32 for an 18 pack of Bud. Outrageous I tell you!
tbear44 on March 4, 2010 at 9:04 PM
LOL The Sequel.
Del Dolemonte on March 4, 2010 at 9:06 PM
Exactly.
Emily M. on March 4, 2010 at 9:08 PM
Anyway, why don’t they do this with all states? Why just Alaska?
ninjapirate on March 4, 2010 at 8:12 PM
Because no one gives a rat’s as* about the other 49 states’ governors or ex-governors. that includes Mitt btw.
unseen on March 4, 2010 at 9:10 PM
So, you don’t have a problem with her? You just have a problem with people who like her because she’s attractive?
Dongemaharu on March 4, 2010 at 9:12 PM
How about all of the Democrat women who think Bill Clinton is hot, despite his record?
In his first term, Democrat Perjurer Clinton had his Justice Department successfully prosecute a career female Federal employee for lying under oath about sex.
Yet when he did the exact same thing several years later, your side said he was above the law, and many women offered to take Monica Lewinsky’s place.
Had a sitting Republican President sexually exploited a female workplace subordinate (in the workplace, no less!) and then asked her to lie about it under oath, NOW would have demanded that he be taken out back and shot.
But since he was Democrat Bill Clinton, they caved.
Please try again.
Del Dolemonte on March 4, 2010 at 9:14 PM
That is just wrong.
conservative pilgrim on March 4, 2010 at 9:15 PM
I cant read McCain’s mind, but after her embarrassing and disastrous intro. to the nation, you can only conclude her looks were the overriding factor.
TheBlueSite on March 4, 2010 at 8:57 PM
Nice try to rewrite history. Her introduction went well. her speech in Akron and her convention speeches were out of this world and knocked the dems back on their butts. It was only later after the McCain campaign screwed up the interview process by allowing avowed liberals first crack at Palin when things took a hit.
unseen on March 4, 2010 at 9:16 PM
I keep wondering why Palin fans think that anyone who thinks she’s a simpleton who would be worse for the country than Obama is somehow a raging liberal.
I figure it’s the same way Obama followers think that anyone who disagrees with their messiah is a rightwing whacko.
TheBlueSite on March 4, 2010 at 9:16 PM
unseen on March 4, 2010 at 9:16 PM
Her intro the nation was a huge embarrassment. Avowed liberals got the first crack at her? That sounds like you’re trying to make excuses. The woman couldn’t name a single newspaper she reads! And that was after being given 3 chances to think of one! She couldn’t name a single bad scotus decision. She had no idea what the Bush doctrine was. She came off as a clueless idiot who was working on a VERY short list of talking points with no thoughts of her own.
Only difference today is she has a professional speechwriter and refuses to let anyone but her adoring fans interview her.
Come on, you guys aren’t this blind to reality surely. It’s just so amazing to see people ignore the plain facts when they just adore someone so much.
TheBlueSite on March 4, 2010 at 9:19 PM
http://www.conservatives4palin.com/2010/03/melissa-lemer-corrects-record-regarding.html
NoNails on March 4, 2010 at 9:20 PM
At some point, the only thing the leftists will have left to do, after trying everything else (to destroy Palin,) is nail her to a cross.
RBMN on March 4, 2010 at 9:20 PM
Film production would bring alot of needed money into the economy up there.
This is a win-win for Alaska.
Oregon’s Governor has been begging (well, he’s bribing them) for the film industry to come to Oregon. We now have Timothy Hutton in Leverage filmed here.
Palin is brilliant for trying to get money pumping through the economy.
portlandon on March 4, 2010 at 9:21 PM
Beat me to it. :P
Enoxo on March 4, 2010 at 9:24 PM
Usually someone who makes the kind of idiotic statements you have almost invariably turns out to be a liberal, or a Libertarian.
sharrukin on March 4, 2010 at 9:26 PM
For a hot minute there Williams was being reasonable…I think it was right after he got a taste of Left hate…he seemed stunned…but then lately he seems to be acting like BOR…like someone has pictures or something…hummmm
CCRWM on March 4, 2010 at 9:29 PM
Derived from her faith in God… I pray for her everyday…
CCRWM on March 4, 2010 at 9:36 PM
You are sadly misinfomed. She was given three opportunities to discuss instances where John McCain bucked his party. She could not do so. (I doubt it would have been very smart of her to do so anyway.) The only reference to what she read was an off-the-cuff question right as Palin came off a rally stage. She was clearly insulted by the question.
Really? Who? I haven’t heard that she has a speechwriter in her inner circle. Link?
It is you who are ignoring facts and reality in an attempt to portray Palin as something she is not.
alwaysfiredup on March 4, 2010 at 9:39 PM
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »