Video: FAA tape of child directing air traffic at JFK

posted at 1:36 pm on March 3, 2010 by Ed Morrissey

Take Your Child to Work Day hits JFK airport in New York City, and hilarity ensues … until the FAA finds out about it. The control room supervisor and the dad have been suspended for allowing a young child to give direction to planes queuing to depart the airport. Big deal or just a harmless diversion for pilots and controllers? MS-NBC had the audio today on Morning Joe, thanks to the site LiveATC:

Speaking as a white-knuckle flyer, I don’t find this particularly amusing. Taking a child in the control room to see Daddy or Mommy do the job is probably acceptable, although one has to wonder just how distracting that would be to the parent in a role where distractions could cost lives. Interestingly, though, none of the pilots seemed to mind, so perhaps this is just a tempest in a teapot.

What do you think? Take the poll:


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4

And just so everyone (who cares) is clear on my pov, I will admit I believe the dad and the supervisor should both get written up, reprimanded or at least given a good talking to. It’s true, it shouldn’t have happened, but I’m much more concerned about UN-supervised adults texting while driving cars, trains etc… They’re usually not that good at driving in the first place.

But a wise old lady once told me there are only 2 problems in the whole wide world that must be avoided at all costs; everything else is cake.

The two things?

Papercuts and hangnails.

Califemme on March 3, 2010 at 8:30 PM

Califemme on March 3, 2010 at 8:24 PM

I like you.

bernzright777 on March 3, 2010 at 8:32 PM

redfoxbluestate on March 3, 2010 at 8:26 PM

Like having snakes on a plane?

The dad could have theoretically jumped in at any point should a disaster occured. It didn’t so we will never know. Thankfully, no one was hurt so we can be a little cavalier about it.

Rightwingguy on March 3, 2010 at 8:33 PM

bernzright777 on March 3, 2010 at 8:32 PM

Thank you. I believe per my strict OSHA standards and CA employment laws plastered all over my offices, I must now depart, or something really, really, really bad “might” happen… LOL!! Good night all!

Califemme on March 3, 2010 at 8:35 PM

The only time the kid was saying anything was when the plane sitting on the runway, was to say “Flight xyz you are cleared for takeoff”, No problem at all.

Dasher on March 3, 2010 at 8:48 PM

I was on approach to land once with a foreigner directing traffic. He had a strange accent that sounded real funny when he said, “clear to land.” The guy behind on approach impersonated the controllers voice when he was cleared to land and everyone who heard it was howling laughing. Everyone that is except for the FAA official that just happened to be inside the tower at the time and asked for the name of the person who was just cleared to land.

NeverLiberal on March 3, 2010 at 9:14 PM

KendraWilder on March 3, 2010 at 4:59 PM

Take a chill pill will ya? A little fisking shall we?

Anything could have gone wrong in a blink of an eye, and lives could have been lost.

Planes don’t crash in a blink of an eye. Anything happening in a blink of an eye is going to be beyond the control of ATC. IOW, the lives of the passengers will depend on the pilot reacting wrongly or correctly, but an ATC is next to blind in any blink of the eye scenario you can envision.

And, in fact, if such an accident had occurred not only could there have been lives lost, but if the crafts had crashed on the ground who knows how many lives on the ground could have been lost.

The duo were doing departures. Dad wasn’t tracking other planes flying about. All he has to do is make sure that the planes on his cue are cleared to fly when safe. He then tells the kid what to say. No different than working with a trainee.

And the airline would have been sued for bazillions of dollars, not to mention the father going to jail for involuntary manslaughter. How would you think the child would have felt because his dad had to go to jail for just trying to show him something about his job? That kid would have been on a guilt trip for the rest of his life.

That’s assuming a mountain of quilt for a molehill. If anything, Dad would be extra alert having Jr on his lap.

Now consider the pilot who was in radio contact with the child. I’m sure that his plane was stopped, and he had nothing demanding going on which required his attention. That could/would have been prearranged, I’m guessing. But what about all of the other pilots who were listening in to that exchange? What if they were taxiing to the runway? What if they were landing their planes? What if they were taking off?

The only ones listening to them are the ones taking off or cueing to take off. The ones flying, taxiing around or landing are on different channels, depending on where they’re at.

Do any of you know what pilots must do when actively operating a flying craft? They must watch 360 degrees of space around them if at all possible. Even though there are air traffic controllers watching via radar, that doesn’t guarantee that at some split second some other aircraft wouldn’t suddenly be buffeted by wind sheer, or lose power, or have landing gear lock up, which might cause them to veer suddenly into the path of other aircraft landing or taking off or just taxiing. That’s why it’s crucial for the pilot to have absolute focus on what they’re doing at all times.

You’re obssessed by these unrealistic split-second scenarios.
1) Windshear -nothing for ATC to do in that split second and the pilot has seconds to do something if not in the critical zone between recovery & hard landing.
2) Lose power? More deadly to lose power on take-off than landing — either way beyond ATC’s ability to help in that “split-second”.
3)Landing gear lock-up? Huh? Again, anything happening to the plane is on the pilot and if he has time, he’ll relay the problem to ATC to clear traffic for him. Pretty much like Sully telling ATC to “wait one” while dealing with the emergency at hand. ATC only knows what the pilot tells him and can “see” for him if traffic is nearby.

To be listening in, and let’s not forget the surprise factor in hearing a child’s voice on the radio giving what sounds like orders to another pilot, talk about distracting, …. to be listening in to that exchange would cause the non-involved pilots to be looking at their co-pilots in surprise, and making casual comments about what the heck is going on. All the while the pilots and co-pilots are distracted form the task at hand which should have their complete attention and focus.

I haven’t heard anything relating to pilots being distracted from their job by a kid clearing planes for take-off. Unless you know more than what was related in this story.

That one seemingly innocent interaction involving a dad who was showing his kid what his job involved potentially place thousands of lives in jeopardy. If I’d been a passenger on one of the planes where the pilot was distracted just as we were landing or taking off, and I found out about it, you bet I would have marched at first opportunity to the airliner’s desk to start filing a series of serious complaints, ending with FAA complaints.

Shows what you know. What does an airline have to do with what gors on in the tower?

That the father/air traffic controller sought permission in advance would seem to be supported by the fact that his supervisor has been suspended as well. If I were the airliner and the FAA, they’d both be canned for unnecessarily jeopardizing so many lives.

Again, what’s with the airliner? Supervisor was suspended because like a captain of ship/plane, he’s responsible for anything and everything in his purview.

People like them know every single day they’re at work just how dangerous air traffic control can be and how crucial it is that they be able to have single-minded focus on their work.

Actually, ATC can be a boring & monotonous job. 99.9% of the time, it’s just choreographing to a tempo. Don’t believe everything you see from Hollywood.

I hope that the “rules” are tightened up after this incident. There is no excuse for this happening. None.

Psst. If the rules are tightened up, it’s because this story got out and hyped by both the media and Chicken Littles.

AH_C on March 3, 2010 at 9:57 PM

I heard on Fox this evening that Olympia Snowe wants to hold Congressional hearings on this.

In. Sane.

CrankyTRex on March 3, 2010 at 10:35 PM

The kid directing the ground traffic following dad’s lead, no big deal, however, when he doodled the picture of full shampoo bottles and extra large toothpaste tube…/

jbinnout on March 3, 2010 at 11:39 PM

AH_C on March 3, 2010 at 9:57 PM

Thank you AH_C. Everything you said, plus the kid obviously knew what he was doing. He was dialoguing with these bored & amused pilots for God’s sake, and didn’t skip a beat. It was done with savvy and sensitivity, dare one say.

Of course none of that will matter to the FAA, because their side of the P.C. coin outranks the other side of the P.C. coin, the side that begs and practically demands parents take the kids to work. As a parent you’re expected to take your son to the office but on the other hand, we need a full day’s work out of you and don’t you dare let him help, or you’re out of a job. Personally I could do with a little less of the socially constructed no-win scenario, a little less responsibility legislated and a little more exercised on the spot.

RD on March 4, 2010 at 12:21 AM

Another point, is that young kids can legally fly an airplane and talk to the tower while doing so

Storm Chaser on March 3, 2010 at 7:41 PM

And Ugly, young pilots CAN fly private aircraft, even with an instructor in the co-pilots seat. And the young pilot (Could be a 13 year old) would be talking to an adult pilot to land at JFK (or through their airspace).

HarryStar on March 4, 2010 at 12:27 AM

@fred5678, the misinterpreted takeoff clearance was only one factor of many in the Tenerife accident.

But by far the major one – not hearing “stand by for” was the single critical failure; if he had heard the whole sentence, or called “say again”, no accident. Even with the Pan Am pilot missing the assigned taxiway, and then recovering, was not a problem, as HE was actively and accurately communicating with the tower. The accident was caused by the KLM pilot, who was in a rush and pig-headed and missed part of the tower’s instructions.

Focusing on that one to pound this kid is kinda lame.

No, twisting my words is really lame. Pounding on the kid? Not at all – just on the dad, the chief controller, and apologists for sloppy and potentially dangerous actions – such as yourself.

Listen to ATC for a while and you’ll hear little goofs all the time.

Been listening since 1965, since I started flying at SMO (the busiest single runway airport in the world at the time) with occasional night operations at nearby LAX.

Even very busy SoCal Approach is casual and chatty these days WHEN appropriate – and trained adults know when to turn it off and stick to business.

Occasional goofs by trained and certified pilots (me included) and controllers, who can REVERT TO DISCIPLINE IN A MOMENT, and who have much better judgment on when a goof is appropriate, is one thing. Children at the mic is another.

Let me know where you fly, and I’ll avoid the area.

Splashman on March 3, 2010 at 7:14 PM

fred5678 on March 4, 2010 at 3:15 AM

And exactly why should children be allowed in air traffic control? Can’t wait for pilots to start bringing their kids into the cockpit to pull a few levers. Or for surgeons to let junior commandeer the scapel for a couple of “insignificant” incisions.

Just another example of parents who think their little darlings should be allowed to go EVERYWHERE and do EVERYTHING. Does anyone set limits on their kids anymore? Say, “NO, you’ve got no business being there or doing that?”

Gosh, wouldn’t it have been fun if the kids had been in ATC on 9/11?

The controller and his supervisor have crappy judgment. Fire the both of them.

Meredith on March 4, 2010 at 5:19 AM

So what! There’s a child in the White House directing foreign and domestic policy for the United States of America!

Cybergeezer on March 4, 2010 at 9:51 AM

Personally I could do with a little less of the socially constructed no-win scenario, a little less responsibility legislated and a little more exercised on the spot.
RD on March 4, 2010 at 12:21 AM

And you got that: the FAA decided, on the spot, to throw the book at the guy. Throwing the book at people is good and wholesome behavior, as Voltaire noted 400 years ago “pour encourager les autres”. That was not waiting for Congress to order them to throw the book at the guy. That was a spontaneous asskicker exercising personal initiative. I applaud him. He’s the hero of this story. Too bad his name isn’t out there.

Chris_Balsz on March 4, 2010 at 10:52 AM

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4