Video: FAA tape of child directing air traffic at JFK

posted at 1:36 pm on March 3, 2010 by Ed Morrissey

Take Your Child to Work Day hits JFK airport in New York City, and hilarity ensues … until the FAA finds out about it. The control room supervisor and the dad have been suspended for allowing a young child to give direction to planes queuing to depart the airport. Big deal or just a harmless diversion for pilots and controllers? MS-NBC had the audio today on Morning Joe, thanks to the site LiveATC:

Speaking as a white-knuckle flyer, I don’t find this particularly amusing. Taking a child in the control room to see Daddy or Mommy do the job is probably acceptable, although one has to wonder just how distracting that would be to the parent in a role where distractions could cost lives. Interestingly, though, none of the pilots seemed to mind, so perhaps this is just a tempest in a teapot.

What do you think? Take the poll:


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4

I fly every week in and out of the busiest airport in the world (ATL) and have no problem with this, so it is my fucking seat. So I say fuck the rules and regulations. There are too many of them choking people into zombiehood.

ray on March 3, 2010 at 3:08 PM

Trolls need to shut the heck up. The kid was cute, probably made the pilots day to hear something different at work. And it’s not like the kid was in control of air traffic for gosh sake.

America needs to lighten up.

cannonball on March 3, 2010 at 3:10 PM

Looks like my last post had too many f bombs.

I said, I fly in and out of the busiest airport in the world (ATL), often into JFK, and have no problem with this, so it is my fking seat (I am on a fking plane in the air between the two locations right now). So fk the rules and regulations. We have too many of them as it is, chocking the sh*t out of people and turning them into zombies.

ray on March 3, 2010 at 3:13 PM

If you want kids involved, go hire a Kiddy Charter. Go FOUND a kiddy charter, apparently there’s a huge market for good-natured Americans tickled to know a kid was somehow involved. Or better yet, go write your Congressman and have the FAA drop the no-kids rule.

Until then, practice some tolerance and respect for liberty and shut up about lightening up. I don’t want kids at the airport. I don’t want kids at the garage. I don’t want to get my suit back from the cleaners and hear how cute it was that a kid pressed it. Kids screw up. Kids aren’t responsible. Kids only pretend to know what they’re doing, that’s the joke about having a kid do an adult chore, they’re faking it, get it?? Stop with the AFHV schtick.

Chris_Balsz on March 3, 2010 at 3:22 PM

The pilots knew what was going on. The dad was on the mic admitting that it was take your kid to school day. The pilot in the audio even said he wished he could do the same with his son. The dad was obviously giving the kid the instructions. Dad right next to him. The kid seemed to do just fine, no stuttering, much confidence in what he was stating. I don’t see the problem.

Sad that the Supervisor is getting it too.

Sultry Beauty on March 3, 2010 at 3:23 PM

Chris_Balsz on March 3, 2010 at 3:22 PM

I think I love you, Chris_Balsz (in a completely platonic, Mr. DrMagnolias would approve kind of way).

DrMagnolias on March 3, 2010 at 3:29 PM

I have to laugh as a surgeon. No harm no foul? A teen child in the OR scrubs in with daddy surgeon and throws a stitch.
Surely, as a surgeon, you have the capacity to see the primary difference between performing an act that takes years and years of medical schooling and simply reciting a quick takeoff clearance to a pilot?
You-Eh-Vee on March 3, 2010 at 2:57 PM

It takes years and years of medical school to tie one knot? Most kids
can do that at age 4 or 5 no? The kid wasn’t operating any more than this kid was directing air traffic.

Marcus on March 3, 2010 at 3:31 PM

While NOT at JFK, I’ve let my son respond back to the Tower when they gave me clearance to take off at Republic Airport in New York, just east of JFK.

I don’t really see what the problem is (from a Private Pilots point of view).

Just as an FYI…this child “could” and IS allowed at the controls of a Private Plane (with a Co-Pilot next to him) AND he can fly TO Kennedy Airport as well.

Having listened to many entertaining conversations from liveatc.net in the last couple of years, this one is priceless.

P.S. My son hasn’t forgotten talking on the radio to the Control Tower at the age of 4.

HarryStar on March 3, 2010 at 3:32 PM

I don’t see the problem.
Sultry Beauty on March 3, 2010 at 3:23 PM

That’s because there is no problem.

Some posters in our midst would like you to believe that reciting a take off clearance is on par with pressing a suit, working in an ER, and pulling the yoke back on a 747 as it climbs through 1500 feet.

Should he have done it? No. Should he be slapped on the wrist? Probably.

Does this have anything to do with civil liberties?

Hell no.

You-Eh-Vee on March 3, 2010 at 3:34 PM

Apparently some posters like kowtowing to authoritarian dictatorial powers in their government. Strange they would hang out here.

ray on March 3, 2010 at 3:36 PM

Trolls need to shut the heck up. The kid was cute, probably made the pilots day to hear something different at work. And it’s not like the kid was in control of air traffic for gosh sake.

America needs to lighten up.

cannonball on March 3, 2010 at 3:10 PM

It was a controlled situation…this is how kids learn to be adults, put them in an adult situation…I bet the kid knew exactly how important what he was doing was.
Meanwhile…we have 30%+ drop out rate…bet this kid is an A/B student (no not a B+ student).
Now the FAA will get involved, and the kid will feel he is responsible.
FAA will flex their muscle, a man will be punished, a kid will be humiliated, a family torn apart with the publicity…and for what?

right2bright on March 3, 2010 at 3:38 PM

I think it’s great that kids get taken to dad’s or mom’s work and participate. There needs to be a lot more of it. Only one criticism and that is the possibility that, even though the little tyke was supervised, his diction and fluency are no match for a seasoned controller, and there could be an interpretation error on the part of a pilot while attempting to discern the directions from an unfamiliar style of diction. I suppose that the father, being present, would be there to correct mistakes or to clarify, but one must admit that having the little feller there and transmitting would raise the risk level; and that is unacceptable.

oakland on March 3, 2010 at 3:39 PM

It takes years and years of medical school to tie one knot? Most kids can do that at age 4 or 5 no? The kid wasn’t operating any more than this kid was directing air traffic.

If you can’t see the fundamental difference between standing over a patient in an operating room, putting your hands in an open cavity and precicely stitching an incision, against daddy telling you to talk into a mic and say “Blue 171, Clear for take off”…well, I can’t really help you.

You-Eh-Vee on March 3, 2010 at 3:40 PM

ray on March 3, 2010 at 3:36 PM

Unless and until air traffic control is privatized, the only way to comment about what we think of the rules is to discuss them within the context of the FAA. From my own vantage point as a semi-regular flier, I would want the same rules in place if ATC were privately operated–I don’t want children near the place.

DrMagnolias on March 3, 2010 at 3:40 PM

Only one criticism and that is the possibility that, even though the little tyke was supervised, his diction and fluency are no match for a seasoned controller

Oakland, as a pilot, trust me, this kid’s “diction” was every bit as good, and in MANY cases far superior to controllers I’ve dealt with over the years. Hell, some even seem hell bent on making it more difficult than it needs to be.

bernzright777 on March 3, 2010 at 3:45 PM

Well, I am about to make another bi-weekly landing at ATL.

Once on the ground, I don’t care if a dog barks what gate we are supposed to park at, as long as his human overseer is watching and ensuring all is ok with the directions.

I am more worried about poorly raised liberal kids legally behind the steering wheel of their liberal parents’ BMW racing down the street than I am of a kid/dog/beaver/etc. voicing the ground directions of an adult human overseer in the tower.

ray on March 3, 2010 at 3:47 PM

No problem. I am a commercial pilot and it is quite obvious what is going on. Dad is giving Kid instructions and Kid is saying them on the air. Kid was not “directing air traffic.”

DWillens on March 3, 2010 at 3:49 PM

Meh, no big deal.

Reminds of an Alan Jackson song;

A young boy, 2 hands on the wheel
I can’t replace the way it, made me feel
And I would press that clutch and I’d keep it right
He’d say a lil’ slower son you’re doin’ just fine
Just a dirt road with trash on each side
But I was Mario Andretti
When daddy let me drive

reaganaut on March 3, 2010 at 3:51 PM

Of course it works. It works for the purpose of illustrating that no harm/no foul, is not tolerated in the real world, especially as it applies to safety regulations.

keep the change on March 3, 2010 at 2:38 PM

If you think no harm no foul is not tolerated in the real world, then you have never been anywhere close to the real world. I have no problem believing that you would jail that teenager for bringing a Tylenol to school.

MarkTheGreat on March 3, 2010 at 3:53 PM

821 people voted that this is a (minor) problem? Some stupid people….

This is nothing.

Narutoboy on March 3, 2010 at 3:53 PM

Air traffic control is a deadly serious business, and there should be absolutely nothing of a distracting nature going on when just recent near misses by jet traffic swerving to miss private jets/planes show how crucial split second timing and decisions and alerts are utterly vital to the safety of all.

And I’m appalled at anyone here who actually thinks it’s “cute”, and doesn’t see anything wrong with dad/mom who are air traffic controllers taking their kids into an actively operating air traffic control room. How would you like it if, on that next flight to somewhere, the pilot took his kid into the cockpit and put the kid in the seat and let him fiddle with the actual flight panel controls during the flight? It’s the same, and the potential for dangerous consequences just as extreme.

There is a real attitude problem these days concerning what is good for kids, and what is acceptable behavior. Parents seem to want to be more like best friends, and reason with the kids and attempt to communicate at their level.

Baloney! Kids are “minors” for a reason: They’re learning what is and isn’t acceptable behavior. And along the way they especially need to learn what is dangerous behavior and how to avoid it so they don’t get hurt by just trying it out, such as putting one’s hand on a hot stovetop burner, or lighting matches, or smoking, or drinking alcohol at too young an age. When a parent and/or adult starts making exceptions, then the kids learn that maybe the parents should be making other exceptions, or they learn to question the parent’s judgment. This could actually cost them their lives if they hesitate at a crucial moment when the parents might be trying to save their lives via split second commands.

How about if the kid wanted to “play at” being a flight attendant? How about if the kid is particularly hefty and tall and strong enough to pull the handle on an emergency exit door during a flight? How would that feel, suddenly having bodies flying everywhere when the airliner goes into a nosedive?

How about if the kid decides to be like his ‘waste management’ dad/mom, and climbs into the dumpster to see what it would be like to be the trash being picked up? Just where do we draw the line on this type of insanity?

First and foremost, protect the kids and teach them that life has untold dangers for which they must learn not only how to protect themselves, but to protect other innocents as well who might get hurt as a result of thoughtless actions.

Taking a kid to work so they can observe what that job or profession entails is a great idea. But they are there strictly as observers, and the adults should be acting like adults in explaining, or perhaps demonstrating, what the job involves. But not if the job has hazards or it could put other people’s lives in jeopardy through a moment’s thoughtless or careless action.

For years I flew a lot, and I loved it. I’ve flown just about every way you can imagine: sailplanes, hot air balloons, helicopters, an old Gooney Bird plane tour of the Grand Canyon, and just about every type of commercial jet made prior to 1995. The only thing I’ve missed out on that is still a dream I hope one day to make a reality is flying in an old bi-plane with a real old fashion barn stormer type pilot.

But after listening to that audio recording I have to say that I thank God that my disability makes it impossible for me to fly commercial planes any longer. Not if the attitude of half our population seems to be that it’s okay for kids to play around in air traffic control rooms! Good grief!

/rant over

KendraWilder on March 3, 2010 at 4:05 PM

/rant over

KendraWilder on March 3, 2010 at 4:05 PM

lighten up.

bernzright777 on March 3, 2010 at 4:14 PM

If heads do role it is because someone in the Precedent’s administration realized that the kids had more experience than da One.

TQM38a on March 3, 2010 at 4:14 PM

Not if the attitude of half our population seems to be that it’s okay for kids to play around in air traffic control rooms! Good grief!

Exactly HOW did the “kid” sound? He certainly didn’t sound like he was “playing” around. And as bernzright777 said earlier, I have also heard pilots with half broken English not be able to understand the Tower WHO ACTUALLY WERE causing problems because they couldn’t follow the directions properly.

Can somebody please explain to me HOW difficult it is for a child to say:

“Republic Tower, 4975 Cleared for Takeoff”?

I for one hope that the PC world don’t come down too hard on him because of this.

HarryStar on March 3, 2010 at 4:15 PM

Not if the attitude of half our population seems to be that it’s okay for kids to play around in air traffic control rooms! Good grief!

/rant over

KendraWilder on March 3, 2010 at 4:05 PM

How exactly was he “playing around”? He gave the exact orders he was supposed to give. His father, apparently, was there directing him the whole time. And based on the laughter I heard, I’m betting the pilots didn’t have much of problem with it, either. Talk about overreacting.

Narutoboy on March 3, 2010 at 4:18 PM

If you REALLY REALLY care about how Traffic Controllers work with Pilots, listen to this one out of Republic Airport on Long Island.

PRICELESS. Come back and let me know how this kid did again please…

Air Traffic Control Problem at Republic Airport

HarryStar on March 3, 2010 at 4:27 PM

How would you like it if, on that next flight to somewhere, the pilot took his kid into the cockpit and put the kid in the seat and let him fiddle with the actual flight panel controls during the flight? It’s the same, and the potential for dangerous consequences just as extreme.

Stopped reading right there.

How the hell is it even remotely in the same ballpark as letting a kid tinker with the actual plane controls.

Please, explain how reciting a takeoff clearance into a microphone is in the same vein as turning knobs and flippping switches in the cockpit of a loaded airliner at 35,000 feet.

You-Eh-Vee on March 3, 2010 at 4:31 PM

Interesting…I quoted myself.

You-Eh-Vee on March 3, 2010 at 4:32 PM

I teach instrument flying for a living. Clear, concise, communication is mandatory for safe flight operations.

The controller and his supervisor, who allowed a child to direct traffic, should be severely disciplined, if not fired.

A VERY SMALL mistake, or even a slight delay in getting it right, as happened here ( “0 3″ instead of “Air Mex 403″, clear for takeoff), can cause problems. See the Tenerife slight communication error for the consequences.

Read this.

The Tenerife controller says “Stand by for take-off, I will call you.” The KLM crew, with the company’s chief pilot as PIC, doesn’t hear the “stand by for” part – only the “takeoff” part.

Largest loss of life in aviation history – 583 people died when two 747′s collided.

Anyone commenting here who wants to be in an airplane with a child at the ATC mike, even with a father/controller nearby, is a fool. I am continuously amazed at how many groundlings, including and especially the media, have opinions on a subject about which they know very little – and where slight mistakes can kill you – very quickly.

fred5678 on March 3, 2010 at 4:33 PM

I have no real problem with this. Children should see how the world works. They should see it from an early age. We have too many boneheads running around who are clueless. Some of them even get into positions of power. Some of them teach.

A little bit of reality might go a long way toward crimping some of the boneheads’ style. Think of how nice that would be.

trigon on March 3, 2010 at 4:33 PM

It wasn’t a kid. To kill a little time after CPAC, Jonathan Krohn decided to take some classes and became a licensed Air Traffic Controller.

eeyore on March 3, 2010 at 4:37 PM

fred5678 on March 3, 2010 at 4:33 PM

Well put.

Del Dolemonte on March 3, 2010 at 4:37 PM

The Tenerife controller says “Stand by for take-off, I will call you.” The KLM crew, with the company’s chief pilot as PIC, doesn’t hear the “stand by for” part – only the “takeoff” part.

fred5678 on March 3, 2010 at 4:33 PM

While this will always serve as the standard for correct read backs between the Tower and the plane, one important fact is that the father was right there as well.

The information from the accident is that AT LEAST THREE ADULTS screwd up here. Tower, Pilot/Co-Pilot.

The instructions in your above example from the Tower were read PERFECTLY CORRECT.

The same thing holds true from the Tower, regardless of whether it was a child or an adult.

HarryStar on March 3, 2010 at 4:47 PM

Cute, but did the Dad not know that he was gonna get in trouble for it?

Tony737 on March 3, 2010 at 4:47 PM

I don’t care how cute the kid sounds or that it may have have been a “bring your child to work” day, this is totally inappropriate. If I’d been on those flights I’d be mad as hell.

beachgirlusa on March 3, 2010 at 4:47 PM

KendraWilder on March 3, 2010 at 4:05 PM

The planes involved were all on the ground.

MarkTheGreat on March 3, 2010 at 4:50 PM

Interesting…I quoted myself.

You-Eh-Vee on March 3, 2010 at 4:32 PM

But did you misquote yourself?

MarkTheGreat on March 3, 2010 at 4:52 PM

fred5678

I teach instrument flying for a living. Clear, concise, communication is mandatory for safe flight operations.

Fred, I was a double “I” for 22 years. You will find noone more in agreement with you as pertaining to your above quoted statement. I believe the controoler should have thought twice about his actions. But I say reprimand him, but let the man learn from his mistake. His kid will gwow up to have greater respect for the industry, and not feel the guilt of getting his old man canned.

bern

bernzright777 on March 3, 2010 at 4:53 PM

contooler=controller
gwow=grow

need nightly caffeine fix!

bernzright777 on March 3, 2010 at 4:55 PM

Oakland, as a pilot, trust me, this kid’s “diction” was every bit as good, and in MANY cases far superior to controllers I’ve dealt with over the years. Hell, some even seem hell bent on making it more difficult than it needs to be.

bernzright777

So, it’s OK because you’ve seen (heard) worse? I don’t get the logic.

oakland on March 3, 2010 at 4:56 PM

bernzright777 on March 3, 2010 at 4:14 PM

HarryStar on March 3, 2010 at 4:15 PM

Narutoboy on March 3, 2010 at 4:18 PM

You-Eh-Vee on March 3, 2010 at 4:31 PM

Okay, I stepped back, took a deep breath, and thought about it even more. And I’m going to calmly and rationally explain what some people seem to not be able to see about the inherent danger in what the kid and his father did.

In order for that child to be talking over the transmitter/radio to the pilot supposedly in on the “play acting”, the child and his father had to be in an active air traffic control room, in what one would assume to be the father’s control cubicle.

First thing wrong is that there are other controllers in the vicinity, if not directly in the next cubicles on either side of that one.

Thank you to: HarryStar on March 3, 2010 at 4:27 PM for posting that link to an actual extremely dangerous control situation that was being dealt with which is a prime example of what the adjacent controllers could have had to deal with while the “play acting” was going on. To have a kid next door trying to play act at being a controller would have been hugely distracting, an in those circumstances might have caused the controller to momentarily lose focus on what that clueless pilot was trying to do. The reason that air traffic control is such a stressful and demanding job is because the controllers must at all times be aware of what is happening with ALL air traffic within the vicinity of their purview.

The fact that there was laughter in the background says to me that other controllers who should have been paying attention to their own radar screens were distracted and watching/listening to what was going on with the play actors. That means that during those crucial moments some planes and/or jets were not being tracked with absolute focus and attention. Anything could have gone wrong in a blink of an eye, and lives could have been lost. And, in fact, if such an accident had occurred not only could there have been lives lost, but if the crafts had crashed on the ground who knows how many lives on the ground could have been lost. And the airline would have been sued for bazillions of dollars, not to mention the father going to jail for involuntary manslaughter. How would you think the child would have felt because his dad had to go to jail for just trying to show him something about his job? That kid would have been on a guilt trip for the rest of his life.

Now consider the pilot who was in radio contact with the child. I’m sure that his plane was stopped, and he had nothing demanding going on which required his attention. That could/would have been prearranged, I’m guessing. But what about all of the other pilots who were listening in to that exchange? What if they were taxiing to the runway? What if they were landing their planes? What if they were taking off?

Do any of you know what pilots must do when actively operating a flying craft? They must watch 360 degrees of space around them if at all possible. Even though there are air traffic controllers watching via radar, that doesn’t guarantee that at some split second some other aircraft wouldn’t suddenly be buffeted by wind sheer, or lose power, or have landing gear lock up, which might cause them to veer suddenly into the path of other aircraft landing or taking off or just taxiing. That’s why it’s crucial for the pilot to have absolute focus on what they’re doing at all times. To be listening in, and let’s not forget the surprise factor in hearing a child’s voice on the radio giving what sounds like orders to another pilot, talk about distracting, …. to be listening in to that exchange would cause the non-involved pilots to be looking at their co-pilots in surprise, and making casual comments about what the heck is going on. All the while the pilots and co-pilots are distracted form the task at hand which should have their complete attention and focus.

That one seemingly innocent interaction involving a dad who was showing his kid what his job involved potentially place thousands of lives in jeopardy. If I’d been a passenger on one of the planes where the pilot was distracted just as we were landing or taking off, and I found out about it, you bet I would have marched at first opportunity to the airliner’s desk to start filing a series of serious complaints, ending with FAA complaints.

That the father/air traffic controller sought permission in advance would seem to be supported by the fact that his supervisor has been suspended as well. If I were the airliner and the FAA, they’d both be canned for unnecessarily jeopardizing so many lives. People like them know every single day they’re at work just how dangerous air traffic control can be and how crucial it is that they be able to have single-minded focus on their work. I hope that the “rules” are tightened up after this incident. There is no excuse for this happening. None.

KendraWilder on March 3, 2010 at 4:59 PM

It depends on how supervised the kid was and WHAT traffic he was “directing.” It sounds like he and his dad are both on headsets with the kid in his lap and he’s just having the kid repeat his instructions.

The kid was very clear and he was not directing planes to runways or altitudes. He was basically just giving them the command to contact the tower before departure and saying goodbye. Thus, it sounds very much like this is a low-risk, low-pressure area where any mistakes could easily and quickly be corrected if they occurred, which they didn’t. Hell, even when the kid is cut off at the start of 403, he repeates his last transmission to clarify, so clearly the situation is completely under control.

And the pilots, who are obviously aware of the fact that there’s a child involved, should be smart enough to confirm anything that sounds funny.

So I see no reason to get bent out of shape over this. At worst, somebody gets scolded for doing it, as far as I’m concerned.

CrankyTRex on March 3, 2010 at 4:59 PM

I guess what Kendra is saying is, in the control – tower all professionalism all the time; no room for amateurs and children. I’m in total agreement.

oakland on March 3, 2010 at 5:07 PM

Any idiot, there are a lot here today, who thinks a child on the ATC is cute, Your effing retarded. Gee… that does explain the retard in europe who let the panty-bomber on the plane without passport…Just, bring a kid to work day. I hope they fire ‘daddy’ and all the people that thought it was ‘cute’. “Daddy can I drive the 747? ” ; ” Why, sure son…It’s easy…” Friggin RETARDS !!!!

Jeff2161 on March 3, 2010 at 5:09 PM

one important fact is that the father was right there as well.

So in a demanding situation, where even slight delays or minor mistakes can have large consequences, you advocate for ADDING to the probability of errors?

The information from the accident is that AT LEAST THREE ADULTS screwd up here. Tower, Pilot/Co-Pilot.

The controller did not make an error under then-current practice – a better direction would have been “hold position” so that a subset of a command cannot be interpreted as the negative of the command. The KLM PIC was the chief pilot of the company and intimidated the copilot, who tried to question the pilot’s actions. These errors have been factored into current CRM. One adult made a mistake. The two other adults could have done better, but did not make mistakes per se.

The instructions in your above example from the Tower were read PERFECTLY CORRECT.

The child made an incorrect call, then had to state it again, correctly – this can cause confusion if another aircraft’s callsign was, for instance, “United 103″. Not to mention the slight delay.

The same thing holds true from the Tower, regardless of whether it was a child or an adult.

Children, or anyone other than a qualified and authorized controller, have no business using the mic. Period.

HarryStar on March 3, 2010 at 4:47 PM

fred5678 on March 3, 2010 at 5:09 PM

I’m sure that we should be able to have the darwin losers take the flight with cute kiddies pretending to be in charge…Serious error in judgement by a person whos judgement is important.

Jeff2161 on March 3, 2010 at 5:16 PM

Coincidentally this story aired the same day that Capt. Scully of “we’re landing on the Hudson” fame retires.

For all those who think this is much ado about nothing, imagine if this distracted air traffic controller was on duty the day that Scully had the near tragedy.

The issue isn’t that nothing bad happened (thank G-d), but that air traffic controllers need to be 100% focused on their job. After all, aren’t we always being told that their jobs are pressure cookers, too many flights and too few eyeballs to watch them?

Heads should roll for sure. This wasn’t cute and it is serious.

redfoxbluestate on March 3, 2010 at 5:24 PM

KendraWilder on March 3, 2010 at 4:59 PM

I’ll fly with you any time.

Isn’t it amazing that you have to lecture to people who would be the first to complain if something went wrong on THEIR flight because of sloppy ATC procedures??

The rest of these commenters/apologists – please stay out of my airspace.

fred5678 on March 3, 2010 at 5:26 PM

There is no excuse for this happening. None.

KendraWilder on March 3, 2010 at 4:59 PM

Lot of if’s to come up with a full conclusion…how about this; no if’s about it, since nothing but good came out of this, let it go. There is no excuse to destroy a man’s family with no harm, no foul.
Make up all the scenarios you want, create all the fantasy about distractions you want…the fact is, in this case, in this instance, everything worked as planned.
There is no reason for complaining. None.
…and please, don’t embarrass yourself with fantasies starting with…But what if….have faith in your fellow man…what if the mechanic brought his son, and a wrench was left in the wrong place…what if, what if, what if…

right2bright on March 3, 2010 at 5:50 PM

right2bright on March 3, 2010 at 5:50 PM

You turn left on red all the time, don’t you?

Chris_Balsz on March 3, 2010 at 5:54 PM

Jeff2161 on March 3, 2010 at 5:09 PM

Wonderful post, junior. Is this take your child to work day for unemployed liberal bloggers?

I assume by your repeated use of the word “retard” and extra punctuation that we’re looking at an 11 or 12 year old?

That would put your parent in the 30 year range? I know there is probably a small gap in maturity and intelligence between the two of you, but knock it off with that crap.

reaganaut on March 3, 2010 at 5:56 PM

reaganaut on March 3, 2010 at 5:56 PM

Actually, today is refuse to use the “R” word in Arizona day. I think the concept is Retarded !

Jeff2161 on March 3, 2010 at 6:01 PM

Lot of if’s to come up with a full conclusion…how about this; no if’s about it, since nothing but good came out of this, let it go. There is no excuse to destroy a man’s family with no harm, no foul.
Make up all the scenarios you want, create all the fantasy about distractions you want…the fact is, in this case, in this instance, everything worked as planned.
There is no reason for complaining. None.
…and please, don’t embarrass yourself with fantasies starting with…But what if….have faith in your fellow man…what if the mechanic brought his son, and a wrench was left in the wrong place…what if, what if, what if…

right2bright on March 3, 2010 at 5:50 PM

Wasn’t that Squeaky Fromm’s appeal to the jury?

Chris_Balsz on March 3, 2010 at 6:02 PM

There is no reason for complaining. None.
…and please, don’t embarrass yourself with fantasies starting with…But what if….have faith in your fellow man…what if the mechanic brought his son, and a wrench was left in the wrong place…what if, what if, what if…

right2bright on March 3, 2010 at 5:50 PM

You are so very wrong on so many levels that my jaw dropped to the floor.

It does not matter that nothing bad happened. What matters is that the father had so little regard for the lives that were jeopardized by his thoughtless actions, that to NOT make an example of him might lead to other careless and thoughtless actions by others who might later point and say something totally moronic like: “Well, so-and-so did it, and nothing bad happened. Why are you getting mad at me?” And another, and another, until one day all the things that could go wrong do, and lives are lost.

The absolutely most crucial thing when dealing with dangerous transportation and the potential for accidents is in anticipating what those accidents might be and how they might occur, and designing procedures and equipment which at their optimum will prevent most, and hopefully all, of those accidents from happening which might cause the loss of innocent lives.

Why do you think that Toyota is being forced to recall millions of automobiles? Because of a design flaw. Unfortunately, even after they knew what the problem was, they didn’t give it enough weight to actually take action to prevent future accidents caused by that design flaw. And more lives were lost. And, in fact, one poor man was sent to jail for involuntary manslaughter when he lost control of the speed of the Toyota he was driving, and the prosecutor is now reopening the case as it seems the guy was telling the truth to begin with. What about his life? How many years, not to mention personal indignities, was Toyota’s lax standards responsible for causing?

So it has nothing to do with, ahem, fantasies. It has everything to do with taking known potential air traffic crises which could lead to accidents that could sacrifice needless innocent lives. And setting in place procedures and rules for air traffic controllers to help prevent those tragedies.

Either you are being intentionally obtuse here for the sake of argument, or you are clueless. Either way, please don’t bother to respond. I’m still picking my jaw up off the ground in astonishment that you would rather jeopardize innocent lives to cover up for a man’s careless and thoughtless actions, not to mention the enormously bad example he set for his child, than to take it as a teachable moment for the aviation industry so that they will take appropriate action to prevent future incidents of endangering air travelers.

KendraWilder on March 3, 2010 at 6:08 PM

reaganaut on March 3, 2010 at 5:56 PM

If that’s all ya’ got, your shooting blanks. So, you like ‘cute kids’ in a secure area…Friggin’ awesome. Most of us prefer professionals guiding, and flying the planes. So, you attack me with bravo sierra based on my Mothers alleged age and my lack of appreciation for your being an idiot? OK, I appreciate your an idiot. Since, you refused to dispute my post but instead preferred to be a reaganut idiot,go molest your daughter if your old enough to have one. Cruel personal attacks are the way of the retarded. Retard !

Jeff2161 on March 3, 2010 at 6:08 PM

KendraWilder on March 3, 2010 at 6:08 PM

If I didn’t know better, I’d think you’re all for hanging the kid, dad AND the supervisor.

I noticed you used might and could more than a half dozen times in your last rant. “Might” and “could” are pretty dangerous words in your world, yes? Don’t forget to put on your helmet before you bend over to pick up your jaw off the ground, because you might bang your head open which could spill your brains onto the floor. Just sayin.

Califemme on March 3, 2010 at 6:43 PM

Cruel personal attacks are the way of the retarded. Retard !

Jeff2161 on March 3, 2010 at 6:08 PM

Wow. Just wow.

Califemme on March 3, 2010 at 6:44 PM

All he did was give the ” go” sign on a slow day

bfd

typically there are some with nowhere near the skills of the pilots or atc who feel they must adhere to mind-numbing rigidity

they can gfts

Sonosam on March 3, 2010 at 6:49 PM

Don’t forget to put on your helmet before you bend over to pick up your jaw off the ground, because you might bang your head open which could spill your brains onto the floor. Just sayin.

Califemme on March 3, 2010 at 6:43 PM

If she was paid to wear a helmet, and didn’t, just for fun, she would deserve to get fired.

I like JFK not being a smoking crematorium/junkyard.

Chris_Balsz on March 3, 2010 at 6:50 PM

If I didn’t know better, I’d think you’re all for hanging the kid, dad AND the supervisor.

I noticed you used might and could more than a half dozen times in your last rant. “Might” and “could” are pretty dangerous words in your world, yes? Don’t forget to put on your helmet before you bend over to pick up your jaw off the ground, because you might bang your head open which could spill your brains onto the floor. Just sayin.

Califemme on March 3, 2010 at 6:43 PM

My guess is that you would be the very first person, should you be involved in any kind of accident in a vehicle or air craft or bus or train or even on the job, to file a personal lawsuit for damages should it turn out that there was just one person with deep enough pockets for you to pick who might have even the remotest possibility of the ambulance chaser you hired for pinning some kind of fault on them.

The fact is that I was a small business administrator during my career, and part of that job included designing and writing up safety programs and procedures, mandated by the State of California which, at the time, had the strictest safety and OSHA laws in the country. Not only that, but it was required that there be ‘fire drills’, ‘earthquake drills’ and many other monthly meetings with employees to review safety procedures and other such things.

How many accidents and injuries we prevented with our thoroughness is unknown. But in the industry at the time, safety was a problem. Yet during the three year period after the safety program was set in place we did not have one single on-the-job injury or accident. No disability claims. None.

But excuse me for valuing human life above all other considerations, including monetary costs and the stupidity of clueless people who tend to cause accidents. Guess my bottom line is that I really am astounded at how many accidents in any industry, which I researched extensively in order to write the safety program, could have been prevented if people just took the time to think things through with common sense, and set in place reasonable procedures and/or equipment which would save lives. The most important thing we did was to get the employees actively involved in the safety program so that they were well informed and prepared for what to do in the case of accident, injury, or unexpected natural disaster.

People who travel by air should be no less informed and protected to the extent humanly possible.

I’m outa this thread now, thanks for reading all who did, and thanks to the blessed folks here who do understand the enormity and impact of what happened. You’re more than smart: You have that all too rare insight that is needed to understand instinctively and intuitively what others overlook through excessively casual approaches to dangerous situations. :)

KendraWilder on March 3, 2010 at 7:04 PM

The people that are making a big deal about this need to get an f-ing life. This is very similar to political correctness, and another example of how society is going downhill due to oversensitivity. It’s not like the kid was giving warnings as to planes potentially crossing other flightpaths, the kid was just giving like two planes permission to take off…and the kid probably did it better than most ATCs. There was no danger here, people who have a problem with this need to take a deep breath, shine off their crash helmet, and retire to their rubber room…but by all means keep the kneepads on, rubber can give you a nasty brushburn.

LevStrauss on March 3, 2010 at 7:07 PM

Saw on the news tonight that this one son was night one, on night two he brought his daughter to the tower to do the same thing. And she sounded worse. Guy is going to be rightly fired.

Marcus on March 3, 2010 at 7:11 PM

There was no danger here, people who have a problem with this need to take a deep breath, shine off their crash helmet, and retire to their rubber room

Maybe we should forget decades of labor law and staff the control towers with juveniles.

This is very similar to political correctness, and another example of how society is going downhill due to oversensitivity.

Nothing, nada, zippo to do with being PC or oversensitive. The sole job of an ATC is to safeguard the lives of the flying public, which does not include a session of show and tell. What does this have to do with political correctness??

redfoxbluestate on March 3, 2010 at 7:12 PM

Geez. Who let in the cranks?

Kendra, you need a hobby. Other than ranting, I mean.

The controller maintained his responsibility at all times. That’s all that matters.

@fred5678, the misinterpreted takeoff clearance was only one factor of many in the Tenerife accident. Focusing on that one to pound this kid is kinda lame. Listen to ATC for a while and you’ll hear little goofs all the time.

Splashman on March 3, 2010 at 7:14 PM

I wanna know who started the cry babying about this? That’s who I want to tar and feather! The JERK!!

DougDavis on March 3, 2010 at 7:17 PM

Maybe we should forget decades of labor law and staff the control towers with juveniles

Well actually we should forget much of our child labor laws, I found them very stupid and unfair when I was a child perfectly capable of handling most minimum wage jobs, not to mention that child labor laws hurt poor families, kids used to be another set of hands to help a family, now they are a financial liability. That said I obviously wouldn’t make them ATCs.

Nothing, nada, zippo to do with being PC or oversensitive. The sole job of an ATC is to safeguard the lives of the flying public, which does not include a session of show and tell. What does this have to do with political correctness??

redfoxbluestate on March 3, 2010 at 7:12 PM

Nobody’s life was in danger. The father was telling the kid what to say, the pilot confirmed everything, when the kid was giving the orders the planes were on the runway waiting to take off. This is definitely oversensitivity, nothing happened, from the radio dialogue you can tell that nothing was going to happen, these were not emergency situations, they are routine back and forth for any flight, and the ATC was right there. The damn plane was on the f-ing ground when they gave the orders. You have a better chance of dying every time you drive your car than with an ATC feeding his kid takeoff commands.

LevStrauss on March 3, 2010 at 7:24 PM

KendraWilder on March 3, 2010 at 7:04 PM

Wow, first you start off with a “wrong” bet, then never recover. This isn’t about “me” its about YOU. And your never ending rants… Which I see “might” end, or I “could” be wrong! LOL!

Also, thank you, as a manager and former business owner, I REALLY appreciate having to cover half the break room walls with “safety programs and procedures, mandated by the State of California…and OSHA laws! Considering noone gets paid minimum wage, its a nice laughter break reading all the minimum wage laws which just MUST be posted! I know, I know, someone just “might” not get paid correctly, which “could” lead to them going home and blowing their brains out. So again, I thank you!

Califemme on March 3, 2010 at 7:25 PM

Oh, and Kendra, dear God, whatever you do, don’t rent “The Hurt Locker” anytime soon!! Your head MIGHT explode with all that COULD have happened!! LOL

Califemme on March 3, 2010 at 7:27 PM

I let my 12-yo son drive down the highway @ 70mph.

But no one got hurt, and he did great.

/s

Ugly on March 3, 2010 at 7:29 PM

Also, thank you, as a manager and former business owner, I REALLY appreciate having to cover half the break room walls with “safety programs and procedures, mandated by the State of California…and OSHA laws! Considering noone gets paid minimum wage, its a nice laughter break reading all the minimum wage laws which just MUST be posted! I know, I know, someone just “might” not get paid correctly, which “could” lead to them going home and blowing their brains out. So again, I thank you!

Califemme on March 3, 2010 at 7:25 PM

This comment was so good I just want to see it twice.

When I see those things in an office where nobody makes minimum wage, I think two things now, who has to contract to make those big plastic posters, and why the hell is the DC government charging me 5 cents for a plastic bag over a supposed bag or two in the Anacostia river when the Feds must be acquiring a gigantic “carbon footprint” over that OSHA nonsense.

LevStrauss on March 3, 2010 at 7:30 PM

Ugly on March 3, 2010 at 7:29 PM

…but would you let your 12-yo son drive down a desolate backroad going 15 mph? That is the real question!

Califemme on March 3, 2010 at 7:31 PM

LevStrauss on March 3, 2010 at 7:30 PM

I blame Kendra! Bwahahahahahaha!

Califemme on March 3, 2010 at 7:32 PM

Would have been great to hear the kid directing a couple of A10′s for a strike on the Taliban.

Zaire67 on March 3, 2010 at 7:40 PM

As a corporate pilot, I feel that this is a non issue. It is over hyped and at no point was safety compromised. The kid was in a controlled environment and at any time his father could take over. It wasn’t like the kid was sitting there while daddy was in the backroom.

Another point, is that young kids can legally fly an airplane and talk to the tower while doing so

Storm Chaser on March 3, 2010 at 7:41 PM

We can’t forget that “Take the child to work” day was originally the feminist “Take you daughter to work day!”
The same people who started this would be the same kind of people who oppose children helping their parents on farms and home businesses. What irony.
I have nothing against this, but come on, a little common sense. Should surgeons bring their kids into the operating room? Cops bring their kids out on a drug bust or undercover op?
You can’t fix stupid.

JellyToast on March 3, 2010 at 7:42 PM

I guess we give Charley Rangel a pass too…like Pelosi said, he didn’t jeopardize the public…who’s to say his cronies didn’t do as good a job as anybody…what’s the harm…it’s just a rule….all those who never took bribes, get a life…

Chris_Balsz on March 3, 2010 at 7:42 PM

As a corporate pilot, I feel that this is a non issue.

Interesting.

Another point, is that young kids can legally fly an airplane and talk to the tower while doing so

Storm Chaser on March 3, 2010 at 7:41 PM

Oh… like this kid?

Ugly on March 3, 2010 at 7:46 PM

And this one?

Ugly on March 3, 2010 at 7:47 PM

Chris_Balsz on March 3, 2010 at 7:42 PM

I wouldn’t care so much about him breaking the laws, if he wasn’t the person WRITING them… Cest la vie!

Califemme on March 3, 2010 at 7:49 PM

As a corporate pilot, I feel that this is a non issue.

…glad you won’t be piloting my next flight

oakland on March 3, 2010 at 7:49 PM

Big Deal — as in worry about something substantial. This is nothing. The kid was doing departures. In the ATC, the air/ground-space is segmented — controllers handling their AO. It’s not like the kid’s dad also had to control the planes in addition to clearing them for takeoff.

AH_C on March 3, 2010 at 7:52 PM

Next time you’re on a plane where you can listen to the cockpit, pay attention to how many times the pilot gets passed to another controller from pushback to wheels-up at a large airport. Even more so if the plane has to de-ice.

AH_C on March 3, 2010 at 7:55 PM

Ugly on March 3, 2010 at 7:47 PM

So, of the thousands of kids who’ve taken flight lessons and flown planes, you point to one example where a pilot committed suicide at 26 and another example where a minor pilot died due to weather conditions?

How do you feel about the crossing the street?

Should it be avoided on bad weather days?

Do you EVER leave your house?

Because all the mights, coulda woulda shouldas and what ifs must drive you liberal!

Califemme on March 3, 2010 at 7:56 PM

OOOPSIE! Did I say liberal? I meant crazy!

Califemme on March 3, 2010 at 7:57 PM

Hey ugly…sounds like that kid…father and instructor all used poor judgment,

“The National Transportation Safety Board investigation concluded that the accident was caused by Reid’s “improper decision to take off into deteriorating weather conditions (including turbulence, gusty winds, and an advancing thunderstorm and associated precipitation.”

If you want a lesson about flying into a storm front. Let me know. I used to seed clouds and no the dangers of flying in and around thunderstorms. A lot different then the environment in the tower.

I can post several aircraft accidents that adults crashed as well. Shall i waste your time? ie Steve Fossett.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fossett

Storm Chaser on March 3, 2010 at 8:01 PM

Oakland,
Just wondering what airlines you fly on?

Ever use regional airlines? Would you like to know their pilots experience and salary?

Storm Chaser on March 3, 2010 at 8:07 PM

Califemme on March 3, 2010 at 7:56 PM

Great point.

The media never tells the story of the planes that land safely across the us piloted by young and old. They just need something that makes the news cycle.

Storm Chaser on March 3, 2010 at 8:10 PM

Califemme on March 3, 2010 at 7:56 PM

Yeah, Califemme… I’m Liberal AND crazy.

*rolls eyes*

Ugly on March 3, 2010 at 8:11 PM

Storm Chaser on March 3, 2010 at 8:01 PM

Steve FossetT?? Seriously? We’re discussing kids doing an adult’s job here.

Get back to me when you can wrap your head around that.

Ugly on March 3, 2010 at 8:13 PM

Was it a bad idea on Dad’s part?

Yes

Did any one get killed?
No

O.k. Reprimand the guy, but don’t fire him. Educate evryne on why it’s best to NOT let your kids do your job. There are plenty of jobs (Police, Fire Fighter, heart surgeon) where bringing your kid to work is probably a bad idea. The kid was supervised and was told what to say, so I guess that’s something. (shrug).

Anyways, please no one, ever do this again.

Rightwingguy on March 3, 2010 at 8:13 PM

Ugly on March 3, 2010 at 8:11 PM

CaliGIRL and CaliGAL were taken, and I recall Obowma telling us that we need to learn to say more than Merci-beacoup… so I improvised… You no likee?

Califemme on March 3, 2010 at 8:17 PM

Ugly on March 3, 2010 at 8:13 PM

Your the one that picked a couple of airplane crashes. I was just pointing out that even adults can make bad decisions and wreck a plane.

Have you ever worked as a controller? Are you a pilot? What qualifies you to determine if this as unsafe as the media is acting like it is?

I can tell you that the kid was easier to understand then several controllers in and out of the states!!!

Storm Chaser on March 3, 2010 at 8:18 PM

Hey Ugly, I would NEVAH call you liberal on purpose, I’m pretty sure I meant crazy :)

Califemme on March 3, 2010 at 8:18 PM

Ugly on March 3, 2010 at 7:29 PM

You’ve got a smart kid.

Rightwingguy on March 3, 2010 at 8:18 PM

This isn’t charming or cute.

Yer fired.

Dave Rywall on March 3, 2010 at 8:21 PM

Dave Rywall on March 3, 2010 at 8:21 PM

Awwwwww….

Rightwingguy on March 3, 2010 at 8:22 PM

I wish one of you commentors who find this deadly serious would call Mark Levin’s show and give him hell about this kid telling pilots they’re cleared for take-off. I’d PAY big money to hear his response! LOL

Califemme on March 3, 2010 at 8:24 PM

As a pilot, you already know what the tower is going to say. It’s just the timing on the clearances so nobody hits each other. These jet jocks are such pros, they could have been given a recipe for guacamole and it would have been, “roger that, sounds tasty, contacting bay departure, good day.” I think the kid did a pretty good job.

And to KendraWilder: Best to stay in bed, dear. The world is far too dangerous a place for you. Nobody was in jeopardy there.

Pablo Snooze on March 3, 2010 at 8:25 PM

“Get off my phone, you jerk! Don’t you have something better to do with your life?!?!”

HaaAAaahahaha, comedy gold!

Califemme on March 3, 2010 at 8:26 PM

This is definitely oversensitivity, nothing happened, from the radio dialogue you can tell that nothing was going to happen, these were not emergency situations…
LevStrauss on March 3, 2010 at 7:24 PM

Emergency: a sudden, urgent, usually unexpected occurrence or occasion requiring immediate action. That nothing happened doesn’t confer appropriateness on the action. And it takes a nanosecond for a non-emergency situation to become an emergency – maybe not with these particular planes, but with others that were under the ATC’s purview. That’s the whole idea – they’re unexpected and stand the best chance of being prevented with constant vigilance, especially where things like air travel are concerned.

redfoxbluestate on March 3, 2010 at 8:26 PM

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4