Nevada poll puts Reid down double digits against Republicans
posted at 2:55 pm on March 1, 2010 by Ed Morrissey
A new poll released yesterday by the Las Vegas Review-Journal shows Harry Reid stumbling badly against both leading Republicans for the nomination. Reid can’t get above 40% against either Sue Lowden or Danny Tarkanian, although Lowden has taken a commanding lead in this Mason-Dixon poll of 18 points in the primary over Tarkanian:

Sue Lowden has emerged as a clear leader among Republicans fighting for the chance to run against Sen. Harry Reid this fall, according to a new poll that also shows the incumbent Democrat continues to trail against his major challengers. …
Coker, managing partner of Mason-Dixon Polling & Research, said those changes are statistically insignificant. But he said it’s worth noting that Reid continues to be stuck at around 40 percent in the matchups.
Another thing to watch, Coker said, are independents, who make up about 20 percent of the electorate. Both Lowden and Tarkanian continued to draw more than 50 percent support from those voters, with Reid’s backing at 31 percent against Lowden and 38 percent against Tarkanian, according to the poll.
“As long as the Republican candidate has a significant lead among independents, it will be pretty hard for Reid to win,” Coker said. “I don’t see today where Reid can get 45 percent of the vote.”
So how can Reid hold his seat while unable to get above 45%? As Allahpundit noted from last week’s Las Vegas Sun poll, encourage a third-party candidate to enter the race and hope for a Ross Perot effect:

Obviously, a third-party candidate hurts Republicans. This presumes quite a bit about the extrapolation of these figures into a real election, however. The choices (other than Reid) that the poll presents are generic candidates. It assumes that the Tea Party candidate would have enough standing to draw significantly from either Lowden or Tarkanian. Remember that Democrats pinned their hopes of rescuing Jon Corzine in New Jersey and Martha Coakley in Massachusetts on significant third-party candidates, only to be disappointed in the actual draw the candidates created from Republican momentum.
Getting back to the more traditional matchups, the most significant findings are in the Clark County results. That is Reid’s power base, including Las Vegas and its environs, which generates a good amount of cash for Reid. His son Rory is a county commissioner for Clark. Yet Reid loses Clark to Lowden by eleven points, and to Tarkanian by six. That’s a very bad sign for Reid.
Equally bad is the lack of bounce for Reid from Obama’s visit to Las Vegas last month:
But as Reid faces an uphill path to win re-election to a fifth Senate term, Obama’s enthusiastic endorsement does not appear to have improved the Senate majority leader’s standing among constituents, according to a new poll conducted for the Las Vegas Review-Journal.
Reid got no bounce from Obama’s visit on Feb. 19, when the president spoke highly of him at Green Valley High School and to business leaders at CityCenter, polling indicates.
A larger percentage of voters surveyed (17 percent) said they would be less likely to vote for Reid following the president’s visit than said they would be more likely to vote for him (7 percent). Seventy-five percent said Obama’s visit would have no effect on how they vote.
That was easily predictable, as Obama has cratered in Nevada:
The Las Vegas Review-Journal survey found that 39 percent of respondents had a favorable view of Obama, up from 34 percent in a January poll but down from a high of 55 percent in May . His unfavorable rating stayed the same as in January, 46 percent. …
The steady decline in Obama’s job approval rating has implications for Democrats in an election year. His 2008 candidacy buoyed Democratic contenders in Nevada and across the nation, and new voters registered in droves to cast ballots for him.
“He doesn’t have the political coattails that he demonstrated when he was elected, so it’s going to be harder for endangered Democrats,” Coker said, including U.S. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and Rep. Dina Titus, both Nevada Democrats. “It’s going to make life tougher.”
With only eight months to the midterm elections and no relief in sight on either employment or ObamaCare, those numbers are not likely to improve. Unless a significant third party challenger enters the race, Harry Reid is toast.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Well… Lady Luck be with us!
upinak on March 1, 2010 at 2:59 PM
You’d think that’d be obvious.
Far too many people (including some HA posters) can ‘t get that through their thick skulls, unfortunately.
Midas on March 1, 2010 at 2:59 PM
So how long do the Dems have to force Harry Reid to retire?
Doughboy on March 1, 2010 at 2:59 PM
And Palin’s headed to Searchlight, to depress Reid’s numbers further and probably to encourage the Tea Partiers to unite on the GOP side to oust Harry.
I expect Lowden to be the nominee, with Palin not endorsing until the primaries are pretty well decided. Her dad did go campaign with Tark earlier, but Romney has campaigned with Lowden. The Romney mojo is pretty strong in NV, too. Lowden winning with Romney support, and Palin working to keep the Tea Partiers in the fold, just might work.
cs89 on March 1, 2010 at 3:01 PM
Cue the Paulnuts whining about Lowden in 3…2…1…
If you nummnutzz throw this election for Reid . . .
justkevin on March 1, 2010 at 3:01 PM
This guy would lose if the Republicans ran a poodle for the seat.
percysunshine on March 1, 2010 at 3:01 PM
And people wonder why the tea parties are being infiltrated by populists and liberals.
Vashta.Nerada on March 1, 2010 at 3:02 PM
Can’t wait for the Las Vegas’ Tea Party monthly “First Friday” event this week at Stony’s. These guys are doing all the grassroots work to kick Harry Reids’ worthless carcass back to Searchlight.
Fishoutofwater on March 1, 2010 at 3:04 PM
Note: Sharron Angle won the Clark county GOP straw poll. You know – the pool of active Republicans, not “likely voters” who don’t vote in the primary. Neither Lowden nor Tarkanian has won a single Nevada GOP county straw poll (!) – Angle has won all but 2.
fred5678 on March 1, 2010 at 3:04 PM
How do you like that? The people think you’re the one that stinks, Harry! Hahahahahahahahahahaha. Righteousness.
scalleywag on March 1, 2010 at 3:04 PM
Well, Harry’s “Tuck ‘n’ ‘Tox” makeover apparently was all for naught.
ya2daup on March 1, 2010 at 3:05 PM
This is nothing new for the leftists. They have a couple more years to try and rot the image of the Tea Party or anyone else who opposes their agenda. The MSM will be their strong arm again.
Itchee Dryback on March 1, 2010 at 3:06 PM
Well, imagine that…as charismatic as Harry is. /
kingsjester on March 1, 2010 at 3:07 PM
Isn’t there going to be a National tea party event in Vegas soon?
pseudonominus on March 1, 2010 at 3:10 PM
Reid shouldn’t worry. It’s only a matter of time before The Coffee Party offers their assistance for his reelection campaign. He’ll be fine. /s
joejm65 on March 1, 2010 at 3:10 PM
From what I have heard, the guy running this “Tea Party” effort in Nevada is some guy that has connections to the Left. In other words, this is an attempt to split the vote to save Dingy Harry’s withered hide. Evidently, it isn’t the real Tea Party at all.
hachiban on March 1, 2010 at 3:10 PM
Time to put that old dog outta his misery.
search4truth on March 1, 2010 at 3:12 PM
I think at this point they could run Dingy Harry against whoever the “special guest corpse” is on the original “CSI” and the corpse would be ahead by double digits.
pilamaye on March 1, 2010 at 3:13 PM
There won’t be a 3rd Party challenger unless the Democrats dredge one up and fund them.
Harry’s gone. If he were smart, and he isn’t, he’d be reserving that moving van now and get ahead of the rush.
GarandFan on March 1, 2010 at 3:15 PM
Reid’s take on Sue Lowden here and here.
Lowden’s campaign slogan: “My job … is your job.”
Reid may have a field day with her record with her employees and shareholders.
fred5678 on March 1, 2010 at 3:16 PM
If only Obama would scold people who spend money in Vegas at least 2 more times, Reid just might have a chance.
/
DrAllecon on March 1, 2010 at 3:17 PM
There appears to be some evidence that the Tea Party of Nevada is an alleged front for a pro-Harry Reid group who is trying to divide the Republican Party in Nevada in order to save Harry’s seat. So while a new party has been started in Nevada, the grassroots Tea Party doesn’t appear to have started it. Just a copy cat using the name.
http://www.examiner.com/x-21777-Las-Vegas-Democrat-Examiner~y2010m2d20-Tea-Party-groups-say-Tea-Party-of-Nevada-is-a-front-for-Reid
desertliving on March 1, 2010 at 3:17 PM
Well…’bye.
Bruno Strozek on March 1, 2010 at 3:19 PM
Some of us are so thick that we can’t recognize that voting for a candidate that is indistinguishable from the Democrat is a good and joyfull thing.
This does not appear to be the case here.
Were you telling everyone to vote for Scozafava?
MarkTheGreat on March 1, 2010 at 3:20 PM
I’ve stated it before with arguments, I believe that had McCain won, the country would be in much worse shape now.
MarkTheGreat on March 1, 2010 at 3:21 PM
Sorry, here’s the right link (I hope).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MBfYQOSSPqc
Bruno Strozek on March 1, 2010 at 3:22 PM
Dunno about now, but we’d certainly be heading down the same road.
Dark-Star on March 1, 2010 at 3:22 PM
I’m pretty sure Sue Lowden isn’t indistinguishable from Reid.
Doughboy on March 1, 2010 at 3:23 PM
Clinton invented it; the latest crop of dems is trying to perfect it – Triangulation.
Nevada is not the only place this is going on. Why do you think dems have been taking on suicidal positions for the past year? They hoped to squeak by.
Vashta.Nerada on March 1, 2010 at 3:23 PM
Are you equating an inconsequential NY house seat witha shot at pulling down the most annoying Senate Majority Leader EVAH?
Because if you are, somebody should be swatting somebody’s thick skull with a brick.
Doorgunner on March 1, 2010 at 3:27 PM
It just amazes me how the media assumes the tea party movement will suddenly become/evolve into a third party candidate in the upcoming election cycles. I would submit that IF most Republican candidates embrace a strong portion of the tea party’s values, there will be no need for a third party in any general election.
The Democrats can “dream on” of they think there will be a major split in the Republican party, even while the liberal media will use every possible way to sell this crap.
Rovin on March 1, 2010 at 3:27 PM
March Tea party in Harry’s home town of Searchlight, south of Vegas.
fred5678 on March 1, 2010 at 3:27 PM
Wouldn’t it be lovely if the right were civil enough to one another that there be an agreement between the tea party and GOP candidates that at some point after primaries, the lower-polling candidate drop out of the race?
Not gonna happen, but a nice political-utopian dream to hold onto.
RachDubya on March 1, 2010 at 3:29 PM
The tea parties in my area of IL are not support Mark Kirk for IL Senate (the “Obama seat”). I am about to tell them to take me off their e-mail list. IL had a primary. The tea party people had a candidate (I voted for him), and he got creamed! Why would a tea party candidate win the general if he cannot win in a GOP primary? Stupidity!
WashJeff on March 1, 2010 at 3:30 PM
Try this link.
fred5678 on March 1, 2010 at 3:32 PM
The tea party people in my area are doing the splitting. Tea Parties need to realize when they lose in a primary do not fight in the next round. View it as a playoff system. When you lose, you go home (but vote in the general) and fight the next season\election.
WashJeff on March 1, 2010 at 3:32 PM
If Harry loses his job, is his boyfriend going to beat him up?
cntrlfrk on March 1, 2010 at 3:33 PM
Cadillac Transport
And Senator Reid has this problem in spite of being a great Golden Pork Retriever? And how about that train? They may have to lease everyone who would actually ride in the thing Escalades or some other equally downmarket mode of transportation.
IlikedAUH2O on March 1, 2010 at 3:35 PM
Would the Cuda let that happen? She’s a true fiscal conservative. I think she’d be trying to talk some sense into the old man if she was his VP.
UltimateBob on March 1, 2010 at 3:36 PM
Nope.
Were you telling everyone to vote for a third party instead of Brown, even if it meant Coakley would win?
Your question is inane to begin with, bub. Brown was the preferable candidate between he and Scozzafava anyway – why would a conservative prefer Scozzafava?
Midas on March 1, 2010 at 3:37 PM
The point has been that your line of thinking is delusional.
You continue to make that case better than anyone else could.
Please, continue.
Midas on March 1, 2010 at 3:38 PM
Harry Reid is toast
Sweeeeeeet
antisocial on March 1, 2010 at 3:39 PM
Midas on March 1, 2010 at 3:37 PM
Didn’t Ms. S. run against Hoffman?
cs89 on March 1, 2010 at 3:40 PM
Cutting off their nose to spite their face.
Again, these people do nothing but help the Dem’s retain seats come November.
Midas on March 1, 2010 at 3:40 PM
Corrected link here.
fred5678 on March 1, 2010 at 3:41 PM
Is it possible to run a deficit in an election? I mean, instead of counting the votes you get, you would end up owing votes to the public?
Wouldn’t it be nice if we could vote against a candidate, instead of just for the other guy?
“Choose oneof the following:
Candidate A _____ Not Candidate A ______
Candidate B _____ Not Candidate B ______”
BobMbx on March 1, 2010 at 3:41 PM
BobMbx on March 1, 2010 at 3:41 PM
After the “hanging chads” debacle? Let’s not tempt fate.
Anybody too dumb to decide between two or more candidates should just stay home. Essentially, that’s what millions do every election- those not motivated to vote are basically saying “neither A, nor B, (etc.)”
cs89 on March 1, 2010 at 3:44 PM
The correct terminology is “Controlled Flight Into Terrain (CFIT).”
In laymans terms: pilot error.
BobMbx on March 1, 2010 at 3:45 PM
If you were to run a liberal false flag operation, what better way than to pull primary votes from the farthest right you could get them, perhaps getting a percieved moderate as GOP primary winner, then go into the general as a third party candidate, splitting the conservative and GOP vote.
Vashta.Nerada on March 1, 2010 at 3:46 PM
But thats my point. Instead of voting for dumbass #2 to get reid of Dumbass #1, you should be able to “un-vote” for Dumbass #1, so if he gets 50 votes for, and 50 votes against, he ends up with 0. No votes, no election celebration.
BobMbx on March 1, 2010 at 3:48 PM
BobMbx on March 1, 2010 at 3:48 PM
???
So if you don’t get the requisite votes, what? The seat stays empty? Governor fills it?
Poorly conceived plan.
cs89 on March 1, 2010 at 3:50 PM
Ried would do better to quit now, buy a metal detector and umbrella hat and go out into the Nevada desert and become a meteorite hunter. At least there he would be among his natural constituency; snakes and sand fleas.
SKYFOX on March 1, 2010 at 3:51 PM
How about two new candidates? Pipe dreams…I know.
Now, term limits….there’s some reform you can sink your teeth into.
BobMbx on March 1, 2010 at 3:52 PM
Let’s see. I put forth well constructed, rational arguments.
You declare that I’m delusional.
And you actually think that this constitutes winning the debate?
MarkTheGreat on March 1, 2010 at 3:52 PM
“Perfect is the enemy of the Good”, anyone?
I’d take a RINO over a Dem any time. The RINO can back us only 50%, 40%, 30% of the time but that’s still better than the Dem who will back us 0% of the time. Even if the RINO votes them Dem party line it still gives us a counter to potentially get the majority position and dictate what legislation gets brought up.
combatwombat on March 1, 2010 at 3:53 PM
Do you normally have reading comprehension problems?
Please re-read the line that I have highlighted from my origional post.
MarkTheGreat on March 1, 2010 at 3:53 PM
You must be a Ralph Nader supporter. ;-)
WashJeff on March 1, 2010 at 3:54 PM
And to think, somebody actually made the claim that conservatives were smarter than liberals.
Please re-read my previous post. All of it this time.
MarkTheGreat on March 1, 2010 at 3:55 PM
Maybe, possibly, on the same road . . . but not worse than we are now. McCain drives that progressive road in a Model T (his first car :) ) at about 10 mph. Obama has a Ferrari going 200 mph. Which one is easier to stop . . . ?
PastorJon on March 1, 2010 at 3:55 PM
All evidence to the contrary, of course.
You flatter yourself.
You shouldn’t.
Midas on March 1, 2010 at 3:58 PM
The problem is that McCain has always been a big believer in health care reform and cap-and-trade.
Even if McCain had won, Pelosi and Reid would still be in charge of writting the bills, so the bills in that circumstance would have been pretty unchanged from what we actually got.
With a Republican president in the WH, telling congressional Republicans that this is something they had to vote for, does anyone actually believe that the filibuster would have worked?
Both bills would have been passed and already been law of the land had McCain one in 2008.
MarkTheGreat on March 1, 2010 at 3:58 PM
Once again, a declaration without a hint of supporting documentation.
Where is this mythical evidence that you keep crowing about?
MarkTheGreat on March 1, 2010 at 4:00 PM
There was more difference between Brown and Coakley than there was between Obama and McCain.
MarkTheGreat on March 1, 2010 at 4:01 PM
How many Dems back us 0% of the time? Outside of SanFrancisco that is.
In reality, I’m supposed to get excited about a candidate that will back us 35% of the time over a candidate that will back us 30% of the time. Whoop dee freaking doo.
MarkTheGreat on March 1, 2010 at 4:04 PM
The question is not just McCain, it’s also the congressional Republicans.
Would they have fought tooth and nail against HealthCareDeform and Cap-and-Trade had their been a Republican president telling them they had to vote in favor, in order to save his presidency?
MarkTheGreat on March 1, 2010 at 4:06 PM
Another problem is that neither stops. Not ever.
For 30 years, Republican leaders have been telling us that we have to vote for the lesser of two evils, otherwise the country will be ruined.
I’ve been doing that. And golly gee, the country is ruined anyway.
Nobody in the Republican party leadership wants to change the road we’re on, they just want to be the guys in charge of handing out goodies, instead of the Democrats.
Reagan managed to slow down the rush to ruin marginally. To do this, he had to fight not only the Democrats, but the leaders in the Republican party as well.
We have reached the point were the only question left is, will we be going 200mph when we go over the cliff, or only 10mph.
MarkTheGreat on March 1, 2010 at 4:09 PM
So you admit that you are a hypocrite?
MarkTheGreat on March 1, 2010 at 4:20 PM
I stand corrected; mixing my political races, ugh.
I remember saying I prefered Hoffman as a candidate, that it was too bad he wasn’t the ‘R’ there, but remember expressing concern about Hoffman’s presence in the race ensuring a Democrat victory.
Gee, how’d that turn out again?
Midas on March 1, 2010 at 4:21 PM
No, I admit (just above) I was mixing two political races in my head for the moment; apologies.
Now, you admit that the Scozzy/Hoffman scenario pretty well demonstrates the impact of a split Republican/conservative race will do in terms of yielding a Democrat victory.
Go ahead, you know you can. Come to grips with it – you don’t have to take my word for it, that race proves it.
Had Hoffman been the ‘R’ to begin with, he’d have won.
If he’d have stayed out of the race, Scozzy would’ve won.
Guess who won, because Hoffman got in the race?
Midas on March 1, 2010 at 4:24 PM
Scuzzy was to the left of the Democrat in the race, but we had to vote for her because she had the magic ‘R’ by her name.
Somepeople don’t care who gets elected, so long as they get to say that there team is winning.
I hope you enjoy the part you have played in helping the Republicans destroy what is left of this country.
MarkTheGreat on March 1, 2010 at 4:40 PM
You’re probably upset that Spectre left the party as well.
MarkTheGreat on March 1, 2010 at 4:41 PM
I thought the recent news that teaparty will NOT endorse Hayworth was more interesting.
I guess that ad by McCain was definitely on-target.
AnninCA on March 1, 2010 at 5:05 PM
I don’t think the president campaigning, particularly now, is effective poll-wise, other than it shows loyalty.
And that does win favors and friends later.
AnninCA on March 1, 2010 at 5:06 PM
“This
warrace is lost.” -Harry “Doubledown” Reid.profitsbeard on March 1, 2010 at 5:14 PM
Harry Reid is, in my opinion, at the age when MOST congresspeople really should retire.
What’s up with these guys (so far) staying in that position until they have to be wheeled in, anyway?
I personally think that’s ridiculous. We are going to have to turn it over to the next generation at some point.
AnninCA on March 1, 2010 at 5:22 PM