Lincoln gets a challenger in Arkansas primary
posted at 2:20 pm on March 1, 2010 by Ed Morrissey
Blanche Lincoln has long been seen as a weak candidate for re-election to the Senate. Arkansans voted for John McCain in 2008, and nothing that Barack Obama and the Democratic leadership in Congress has done since has made them any more sympathetic to their agenda. Lincoln hoped that publicly opposing parts of ObamaCare and blocking Card Check might blunt voter anger in her state, but she still trails four relatively unknown Republicans in early polling. Her opposition to Card check did have some impact on the race, though:
Arkansas Lt. Gov. Bill Halter is moving ahead with a primary challenge to Sen. Blanche Lincoln, he announced Monday.
“Washington is broken,” Halter said in a video on his campaign website. “Bailing out Wall Street with no strings attached, while leaving middle-class Arkansas taxpayers with the bill; protecting insurance company profits instead of protecting patients and lowering health costs; gridlock, bickering and partisan games while unemployment is at a 25-year high. Enough’s enough.”
Halter’s decision further complicates Lincoln’s already difficult path to a third term. Polls have shown the senator trailing a slew of Republican opponents, including Rep. John Boozman and state Sen. Gilbert Baker, and she has angered her own party’s base by shying away from support for liberal priorities such as the Employee Free Choice Act and a government-run health insurance plan. …
The Progressive Change Campaign Committee, a liberal group that launched the website DumpLincoln.com, released a statement Monday from its co-founder, Adam Green, calling Lincoln “out-of-touch” and predicting: “Bill Halter’s populist candidacy will speak to voters who know that Blanche Lincoln is part of a broken Washington.”
“Washington is broken”? If that’s Halter’s campaign slogan, he’d better check to see who’s been running it lately. Democrats have large majorities in both chambers of Congress and the White House. If Washington is broken, is the answer sending more Democrats after almost four years of controlling both the House and the Senate? I doubt Arkansans will buy that argument.
Let’s put it this way. ObamaCare’s support among the electorate has dropped to below 40% in most polling, especially among likely voters. Cap-and-trade legislation already stalled, and the latest scandals from the IPCC and the AGW movement won’t help revive it. Democrats have spent most of a year bickering mainly among themselves to overhaul a health-care system of which most people approve while ignoring the fact that over four million jobs have disappeared without hardly a mention by Congress. And it’s Lincoln who’s out of touch?
The challenge from the Left to Lincoln will force her to tack back to the progressive wing during the primary — a move that will seal her fate in the general election, assuming she gets that far. A win by Halter will allow Arkansas Republicans to paint Democrats as radical statists who haven’t listened at all to their constituents for the last year. Either way, Halter’s candidacy makes a GOP pickup in Arkansas almost a certainty.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
It was that anyway.
misterpeasea on March 1, 2010 at 2:22 PM
cue obligatory Waterloo music.
…..and those tasseled boots!….*swoon*
ted c on March 1, 2010 at 2:23 PM
Bye Bye Blanche.
cs89 on March 1, 2010 at 2:23 PM
The only reason Washington is labeled as broken is because SOME of the politicians listen to the people and vote against tyranny. Let’s put another pro-Constitution politician in office and get rid of Lincoln!!!
search4truth on March 1, 2010 at 2:24 PM
I got an email from MoveOn a couple of weeks ago about this. They were pretty upset that an awful conservative like Lincoln was derailing health care reform. Third party for the left???
El_Terrible on March 1, 2010 at 2:24 PM
OT: Obama to introduce health care bill Wednesday, “much smaller” than House version
http://whitehouse.blogs.foxnews.com/2010/03/01/obama-to-introduce-health-care-bill-wednesday-much-smaller-than-house-version/
Mark1971 on March 1, 2010 at 2:24 PM
The only downside is she may be more prone to support reconciliation.
Doughboy on March 1, 2010 at 2:25 PM
Yeah. Now that she has no hope of being reelected, she’s a loose cannon.
misterpeasea on March 1, 2010 at 2:26 PM
In other words…
… water is wet.
Seven Percent Solution on March 1, 2010 at 2:27 PM
Yep, and she will have to exhaust her limited funds to fight off this primary challenge. She is through.
FireBlogger on March 1, 2010 at 2:27 PM
I’m not sure what “much smaller than the House version” means. Does that just mean it doesn’t have a public option, because the Senate already dropped that.
And doesn’t introducing a new bill mean they have to wait for the CBO to score it? The deadline for getting something through is reportedly the end of the month. That doesn’t leave them much time.
Doughboy on March 1, 2010 at 2:29 PM
<–agrees with "Doughboy", she could GAMBLE, vote "aye" and hope somehow ,someway this Fascist idea becomes popular in a few years ,and run on the platform " I was right then , and I voted with OBAMA every chance I could ". Then again if history unfolds like that you will either be living in a hut or become a " freedom fighter / Home grown Tea Party Terrorist"
Gee the future seems bright after the fall out of " THE ONE "
ELMO Q on March 1, 2010 at 2:31 PM
His Republican opponent in November will appreciate the soundbite to be used against Halter. lol
Midas on March 1, 2010 at 2:37 PM
Oh you cynical, cynical people. It’s not Washington that’s broken, it’s the American people.
misterpeasea on March 1, 2010 at 2:38 PM
Repugnicans can faux up a crow bar .
borntoraisehogs on March 1, 2010 at 2:38 PM
Just to give my bonafides: I’m a long time resident of Arkansas and am currently a political scientist teaching at Arkansas Tech University, Russellville.
1) While several of the candidates running in the Republican primary are relatively unkown, that cannot be said of the top two candidates. The best analog for Gilbert Baker is Scott Brown – a successfull Republican politician in a Democrat-dominated state who has served as a state senator.
But the big dog in the race is John Boozman. Boozman is the *only* current Republican serving in the Arkansas delegation and he weathered the storm of the fall of the Hutchinson’s and the paltry Republican organization to solidify himself as the representative from Northwest Arkansas (a traditional Republican bastion).
2)I don’t agree with Ed that a primary challenge is going to force Lincoln to ‘tack back’ to the progressives. Arkansas isn’t Massachusets. You don’t run to the Left here and win alot of elections. Halter’s challenge isn’t from the Left — it is from the Right (i.e. fiscal spending). If anything, I expect Lincoln to even further distance herself from the radical Left that is killing her candidacy.
3) Blanche has alot of money. I still expect her to make it out of the primary…and lose handily to the next senator from the great state of Arkansas: John Boozman.
D.GOOCH
DGOOCH on March 1, 2010 at 2:40 PM
And So It Begins, The Kool Aide Has Worn Off.
Dr Evil on March 1, 2010 at 2:44 PM
OT: Obama to introduce health care bill Wednesday, “much smaller” than House version
It’s hard for me to believe he would put his name on anything,I hope it comes back to bite him big time!
ohiobabe on March 1, 2010 at 2:47 PM
Sure am glad he made that ‘hard pivot’ to jobs or whatever.
Healthcare reform on the back burner to prioritize jobs/economy instead or something.
Midas on March 1, 2010 at 2:48 PM
Halter is pretty stupid for wanting to run as a Democrat for ANYTHING this November.
GarandFan on March 1, 2010 at 2:53 PM
Yeah, this phrase is being used way too much lately.
Perhaps something more fitting is in order; like maybe “Washington has a great big boo-boo!”, or even something more dramatic like “Washington’s fallen! And it can’t get up!”
But if you really think about it, maybe something like “Washington: YOU LIE!” says it in more ways than one.
pilamaye on March 1, 2010 at 2:59 PM
When one polls behind “any candidate,” your chances are not good. Voting for/against Obamacare, Lincoln’s staff had better be spending time updating their resumes.
highhopes on March 1, 2010 at 3:00 PM
America is not broken, it is broke.
highhopes on March 1, 2010 at 3:03 PM
Halter is a POPULIST???
let me LOL
the guy is a politico through and through. he’s best known for focusing his term as lt gov entirely on getting arkansas a lottery. that’s all he did, and now that it’s here, there are rumors of kickbacks and that there’s not as much money as promised
he’s also rabid on a few other issues. but he’s no populist
look, EVERY democrat in arkansas is conservative (minus the university towns and the LR minorities). but this guy is a terrible candidate. boozman wins 60-40 imo. all the gop has to do is say “a vote for halter is a vote for obamacare & nancy pelosi”
thing writes itself
battleoflepanto1571 on March 1, 2010 at 3:12 PM
My pappy said, son, you’re going to drive me to drinking if you don’t stop voting for that Blanche Lincoln.
Emperor Norton on March 1, 2010 at 3:19 PM
The answer is Sarah Palin. And like minded non-egotistical common sense conservatives.
mike_NC9 on March 1, 2010 at 4:28 PM
Did I get that right? Liberals are backing Halter?
Well … quick question – how would Halter have voted on ObamaCare? If he says “nay” – then why are the liberals backing him? If he says “Yay” – then how’s he different from Lincoln and just how does that score him any points in conservative Arkansas?
Well Halter may beat her – but he won’t beat this question … “As Senator – are you going to support the agenda of Barack Obama?”
He’s going to get that in the primary for sure. And there is no good answer for him.
HondaV65 on March 1, 2010 at 5:03 PM
Heh. I would love to see a three-way race; it would be like NY-23 in reverse! I doubt either one of these two has the stones to run on a non-Democratic ticket tho.
Not surprised to see Halter toss his hat in the ring. He’s a very ambitious guy, really looks the part of the career politician. About the only good thing I can say about him is that he got us a lottery finally. I know there are complaints about corruption and the like, but at least we’re no longer losing millions every year to corruption in all the surrounding states — let’s keep the graft right here at home! Anyway, I like not having to drive over to Oklahoma to get my tickets anymore.
This guy is a liberal through and through tho. He’s reportedly very pro-union, and the one thing Blanche did right last year was to vote against card check. Halter would not do the same I don’t think. And he very deftly avoided any mention of ObamaCare in his announcement, just a lot of platitudes about how Washington is out of control and we need to take Arkansas values to DC, blah-blah-blah. Guys like this are OK at the state level b/c they have to temper their liberalism since they are so accountable to the people. If we sent him to Washington, it would be a much different story. I would not be surprised to learn he is a Chicago machine candidate. Obama would love to replace fence-sitting, Blue Dog Blanche with a reliable “yes” vote in Bill Halter. Fortunately, I think Arkansans are smart enough to see through this, but I will be curious to see how he polls against potential Republican opponents. He’s certainly more popular than Blanche is, but you could say that about just about anyone right now.
NoLeftTurn on March 1, 2010 at 11:20 PM
FYI, I make my case here as to why Halter’s entry is not likely to influence Lincoln’s vote on Obamacare. D.GOOCH
DGOOCH on March 2, 2010 at 1:08 AM