Quotes of the day

posted at 10:30 pm on February 26, 2010 by Allahpundit

“Evolutionary psychologist Satoshi Kanazawa at the the London School of Economics and Political Science correlated data on these behaviors with IQ from a large national U.S. sample and found that, on average, people who identified as liberal and atheist had higher IQs. This applied also to sexual exclusivity in men, but not in women. The findings will be published in the March 2010 issue of Social Psychology Quarterly…

“‘The adoption of some evolutionarily novel ideas makes some sense in terms of moving the species forward,’ said George Washington University leadership professor James Bailey, who was not involved in the study. ‘It also makes perfect sense that more intelligent people — people with, sort of, more intellectual firepower — are likely to be the ones to do that.’

“Bailey also said that these preferences may stem from a desire to show superiority or elitism, which also has to do with IQ. In fact, aligning oneself with ‘unconventional’ philosophies such as liberalism or atheism may be ‘ways to communicate to everyone that you’re pretty smart,’ he said…

“Religion, the current theory goes, did not help people survive or reproduce necessarily, but goes along the lines of helping people to be paranoid, Kanazawa said. Assuming that, for example, a noise in the distance is a signal of a threat helped early humans to prepare in case of danger.”

***
“The jury may be out on whether conservatives are less intelligent than liberals, but there’s evidence that they may be physically stronger. Last year, the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences published a fascinating paper by Aaron Sell, John Tooby and Leda Cosmides of the Center for Evolutionary Psychology at the University of California, Santa Barbara. The authors measured the strength of 343 students using weight-lifting machines at a gym. The students also completed questionnaires designed to measure, among other things, their proneness to anger, their history of fighting and their fondness for aggression as a way to solve both individual and geopolitical problems.

“Sell, Tooby and Cosmides found that men (but not women) with the most physical strength were also the most likely to feel entitled to good treatment, anger easily, view themselves as successful in winning conflicts and believe in physical force as a tool for resolving interpersonal and international conflicts. Women who thought of themselves as pretty showed the same pattern of greater aggression. All of which means that if you are a liberal who believes you’re smarter than conservatives, you probably shouldn’t bring that up around them. You might not like them when they’re angry.”


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3

That link from the Jester site is verrrry interesting. I suppose the powers that be could be playing dumb and saying we think they acted alone so other conspirators aren’t put on notice.

mikeyboss on April 23, 2013 at 11:29 AM

were motivated by religion

Are they sure it wasn’t a Ben Affleck movie?

RadClown on April 23, 2013 at 11:36 AM

The one guy — a boxer, no advanced education. The other guy, a pothead college student, no technical education.

The difficult part is (a) detonator and (b) radio control of detonation. Would appear difficult, yes? Apparently not. The info is readily available on the interwebs. Like here. If you can use Google, then read and look at pictures, yes you can create a remote detonator out of toy parts.

Welcome to the 21st century.

SunSword on April 23, 2013 at 11:42 AM

SunSword on April 23, 2013 at 11:42 AM

Yep. And even that example is overly complicated.

stvnscott on April 23, 2013 at 12:00 PM

Here’s the real problem believing these two did this alone.

Where?

Tamerlan had his wife and mother living with him. So the wife has to be an accomplice. I wouldn’t doubt the mother is.

Jahar had several roommates. Some of these winners are being arrested and released, rinse repeat.

Neither had a job that provided the workspace.

So to believe no one else was involved, means they bought the supplies just a few days before and built it that morning, during the race. With no training or testing.

Along with the other IED’s.

And several guns.

And hundreds of rounds.

Just got it all over the weekend.

The Feds are lying that no one else was involved. Whatever statement Jahar gave them fit their needs.

Hell, he could have said yes to a question that asked “was anyone else involved with the Marathon bombing”?

That’s totally different than “Are you working with any groups”?

budfox on April 23, 2013 at 12:08 PM

Looks like Tamerlin may have murdered a few friends on September 11th 2011…

Click Me

Smoothies on April 23, 2013 at 12:13 PM

Two U.S. officials: Preliminary evidence suggests bombers motivated by religion

All I can say is “no shiite sherlock”.

dentarthurdent on April 23, 2013 at 12:33 PM

The difficult part is (a) detonator and (b) radio control of detonation. Would appear difficult, yes? Apparently not. The info is readily available on the interwebs. Like here. If you can use Google, then read and look at pictures, yes you can create a remote detonator out of toy parts.

Welcome to the 21st century.

SunSword on April 23, 2013 at 11:42 AM

Yup, so obviously the laws that make it illegal to make a bomb, and the laws that make it illegal to kill and maim lots of people are just not effective – so all we need is some more laws to make those things more illegal and we can solve the problem.

dentarthurdent on April 23, 2013 at 12:37 PM

I’m sure a guy who’s blown people up, shot a cop in cold blood and tried to kill some more in a getaway, would never tell a lie.

IndieDogg on April 23, 2013 at 12:39 PM

Exactly how would the RUSSIANS have pegged one of the two “lone wolves” operating in America as a terrorist if this is true. Are they doing a better job of monitoring American internet traffic than our own intelligence agencies. Either that or our govt is lying to us – again. We are screwed either way.

LarryinLA on April 23, 2013 at 1:18 PM

Mocking another person from a position of ignorance is never a wise move. Your screen name is ironic considering how myopic you insist on being with regard to this particular issue.

stvnscott on April 23, 2013 at 11:18 AM

It was a joke.

farsighted on April 23, 2013 at 1:46 PM

Acted alone?? Really??

Where did the MONEY come from?? For the clothes, the cars, the apartments, the GYM and boxing. I guess they just came in from the internet as well.

Michael73501 on April 23, 2013 at 2:13 PM

I hear the term ‘self radicalized’ all over the news. They can’t understand how the bombers don’t have a direct connection to terrorists, but can do this.

It is imperative to understand it is not ‘radical’ Islam.

It is Islam – the antithesis of western civilization.

TfromV on April 23, 2013 at 8:18 PM

Acted alone?? Really??

Where did the MONEY come from?? For the clothes, the cars, the apartments, the GYM and boxing. I guess they just came in from the internet as well.

Michael73501 on April 23, 2013 at 2:13 PM

They’ll conveniently come out with information that attacks the internet, and freedom but they won’t tell us who funded these guys. Probably because it was the Sauds or the FBI.

fatlibertarianinokc on April 23, 2013 at 8:46 PM

It’s still too early to say what his motivations were, but I have a hunch he’s a tea partier.

/msm

jhffmn on April 25, 2013 at 12:59 PM

Comment pages: 1 2 3