Patriot Act renewal passes House

posted at 10:12 am on February 26, 2010 by Ed Morrissey

The House had another opportunity for progressives to do a little piñata-beating on a bill last night — but curiously, it passed with little note or controversy.  The extension of the Patriot Act sailed through the lower chamber with almost no one noticing, following a similarly quiet passage out of the Senate earlier in the week:

The House of Representatives reauthorized the Patriot Act for one year Thursday.

The vote was 315-97 .

Many liberals in the House opposed the controversial act, saying it tramps Constitutional protections and civil liberties.

During George Bush’s term in office, every renewal the Patriot Act became grand theater, with newspapers inveighing against the overreach of Bush and the danger to American liberty in the bill, which wasn’t an entirely vacuous argument.  Protesters would fill streets, and reporters would demand positions from various members of Congress.  So what happened this year?

First, Barack Obama took most of the wind out of the critics’ sails when he voted to extend the Patriot Act in the summer of 2008, reversing a pledge he had made just a few months earlier.  This shocked the New York Times, but it acknowledged that actual, principled opposition to the Patriot Act was among a small minority, as opposed to the majority of critics who used it as a political bat to beat Bush.  Even at that time, the filibuster that Obama promised to join had only a baker’s dozen committed to it, far short of the 41 votes needed to hold up a critical piece of wartime legislation.

That brings us to the main point.  Republicans have mostly supported this bill because they believe it a necessary tool for counterintelligence and counterterrorism.  Democrats mainly opposed it as a way to rally political opposition to Bush and the Republicans.  Now that they’re in charge and responsible for preventing attacks, that Patriot Act looks pretty darned good to most of them.

I (mostly) disagree with the 97 who voted against the renewal of the Patriot Act, but at least I respect their integrity.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

Bush was right again.

Or will the progressives now start attacking Obama for using the constitution as toilet paper as they claimed Bush was doing.

Skywise on February 26, 2010 at 10:15 AM

Are the Kos Kids in an uproar?

Elizabetty on February 26, 2010 at 10:15 AM

Something else that Dear Leader inherited.

Dingbat63 on February 26, 2010 at 10:16 AM

Wow! That’s a huge majority! I guess we can count on those 97 to remain ever vigilant and that’s probably a good thing.

Cindy Munford on February 26, 2010 at 10:17 AM

Here KosKosKos!

Here Huffnpuff! Here girl!

Their silence speaks volumes.

JamesLee on February 26, 2010 at 10:17 AM

They told me if I voted for Sarah Palin the Patriot Act would be renewed. And they were right!

rbj on February 26, 2010 at 10:18 AM

Are the Kos Kids in an uproar?

Elizabetty on February 26, 2010 at 10:15 AM

Of course. They always are. Bushitler is making Zero do things he doesn’t want to do.

SouthernGent on February 26, 2010 at 10:18 AM

A moment of common sense in a lifetime of stupid.

AubieJon on February 26, 2010 at 10:18 AM

The hypocrisy of the Left never ceases to amaze me.

OldEnglish on February 26, 2010 at 10:19 AM

During George Bush’s term in office, every renewal the Patriot Act became grand theater, with newspapers inveighing against the overreach of Bush and the danger to American liberty in the bill, which wasn’t an entirely vacuous argument

It isn’t a vacuous argument when it is useful to bludgeon GWB with. It becomes vacuous when BHO is president and, Heaven help us, acting in the best interests of the country.

It is certainly a cautionary note on liberty. The key difference is the character of the man wielding the Act. ….One could argue that that difference, is far more telling than the Act itself.

ted c on February 26, 2010 at 10:20 AM

God Bless ‘em.

OmahaConservative on February 26, 2010 at 10:20 AM

I blame George Bush and Dick Cheney. Get well, Dick.

Philly on February 26, 2010 at 10:23 AM

but at least I respect their integrity.

There libs, What integrity?

SHARPTOOTH on February 26, 2010 at 10:25 AM

I am still waiting for all of the abuses the Patriot Act was going to cause.

Howcome on February 26, 2010 at 10:26 AM

Are the Kos Kids in an uproar?

Elizabetty on February 26, 2010 at 10:15 AM

You go first!

donh525 on February 26, 2010 at 10:26 AM

Someone spray Troll-B-Gone?

Akzed on February 26, 2010 at 10:26 AM

Where is this headline: “Patriot Act unexpectedly renewed”?

Maybe Obama should tout this as bi-partisan.

cyclown on February 26, 2010 at 10:27 AM

Sometimes I miss the drama and the “a chill wind blows in the United States”. But most of the time I’m just enjoying the hypocritical silence.

myrenovations on February 26, 2010 at 10:29 AM

During George Bush’s term in office, every renewal the Patriot Act became grand theater, with newspapers inveighing against the overreach of Bush and the danger to American liberty in the bill, which wasn’t an entirely vacuous argument.

It wasn’t!?!

I (mostly) disagree with the 97 who voted against the renewal of the Patriot Act, but at least I respect their integrity.

*facepalm*

Kensington on February 26, 2010 at 10:29 AM

Someone spray Troll-B-Gone?

Akzed on February 26, 2010 at 10:26 AM

*sniff* I know that smell. It’s liberty!

Scott P on February 26, 2010 at 10:29 AM

I’m surprised they didn’t re-name it so their ignorant followers could claim it wasn’t the ‘Bush’ Patriot Act.

cntrlfrk on February 26, 2010 at 10:30 AM

Democrats mainly opposed it as a way to rally political opposition to Bush and the Republicans. Now that they’re in charge and responsible for preventing attacks, that Patriot Act looks pretty darned good to most of them

Agreed. But at this point, I wouldn’t put it past the Dems to use this act as a means against the American people. I mean….we should not expect any reasonable privacy, when going about or day….should we?

capejasmine on February 26, 2010 at 10:31 AM

I (mostly) disagree with the 97 who voted against the renewal of the Patriot Act, but at least I respect their integrity.

A healthy respect for the enemy is never a bad thing!

donh525 on February 26, 2010 at 10:31 AM

ALWAYS remember that there is no bias in the media.

jukin on February 26, 2010 at 10:31 AM

Between the pat act, end of AGW and the B!tch slapping the republicans gave Obamugabe yesterday, what does the LSM have to talk about?

TheSitRep on February 26, 2010 at 10:31 AM

I (mostly) disagree with the 97 who voted against the renewal of the Patriot Act, but at least I respect their integrity.

Integrity? Where’s the integrity in voting against a bill that protects America from terrorists?

SoulGlo on February 26, 2010 at 10:32 AM

Andrew Sullivan weeps.

Then growls that Palin must be to blame.

Mr. Joe on February 26, 2010 at 10:34 AM

Someone spray Troll-B-Gone?

Akzed on February 26, 2010 at 10:26 AM

Licking their wounds after yesterdays shellacking.

They will return!

donh525 on February 26, 2010 at 10:34 AM

Cheney must have threatened all the Dems’ families with being murdered by Blackwater/Halliburton. Its the only explanation for why they are renewing the Patriot Act.

KeepOhioRed on February 26, 2010 at 10:34 AM

Sarah Palin is Andrew Sullivan’s Emmanuel Goldstein.

Mr. Joe on February 26, 2010 at 10:35 AM

Could you see Dems actually voting for ANYTHING that diminished their power?

GardenGnome on February 26, 2010 at 10:35 AM

capejasmine on February 26, 2010 at 10:31 AM

Nothing wrong with a healthy dose of skepticism.

fourdeucer on February 26, 2010 at 10:38 AM

well after Obama, the only politicians that can hold to the “Civil Libertarian” block will be the deceitful loons like Ron Paul.

It will never confirm to them, that this is a concession of the necessity of the program. Not even Obama wants american blood on his hands and prefers to thwart terror plots.

jp on February 26, 2010 at 10:42 AM

Hello Kos Kowards.
Hello to Code Pink Hormonally Challenged.
Hello Move On- Never!!!
Hello Democratic Underbelly.
Hello Keith Olberdolt.
Hello Rachel Man-Wow!

Please speak some truth to this power!

Doorgunner on February 26, 2010 at 10:43 AM

Joe Biden says the Patriot Act was a major legislative accomplishment for this administration.

Kafir on February 26, 2010 at 10:45 AM

Doesn’t Joe Lieberman owe some Dem leadership some kicks to the crotch, again?

Doorgunner on February 26, 2010 at 10:47 AM

You go first!

donh525 on February 26, 2010 at 10:26 AM

I R Skeerd

Elizabetty on February 26, 2010 at 10:47 AM

Someone spray Troll-B-Gone?

Akzed on February 26, 2010 at 10:26 AM

Under-the-Bridge Summit meeting.

Lunch menu: Baked botoxed crow, roasted barry nuts, and White House Garden greens salad with lead dressing.

mmmmm mmmmm mmmmm

Yoop on February 26, 2010 at 10:47 AM

“I love the smell of Troll-B-Gone in the morning. Smells like victory.”

Akzed on February 26, 2010 at 10:48 AM

crr6 was not available for comment

Doorgunner on February 26, 2010 at 10:49 AM

I (mostly) disagree with the 97 who voted against the renewal of the Patriot Act, but at least I respect their integrity.

Of what value is the integrity of a man who “boldly” and unwaiveringly adheres to ideas and principles that undermine the the life he is living in the practice of the that integrity?

And so, what does it mean to respect such a man? I’m just sayin’.

beselfish on February 26, 2010 at 10:49 AM

Liberal support of the Patriot Act falls right in line with their support of:

Rendition…

Indefinite detention…

Enhanced interrogation….

Signing Statements….


Executive privilege….


NSA Wiretapping…..

Tax cheating…..

Racism…..

Bombing villages and killing civilians….


Making deals with lobbyist,hiring lobbyist,and helping K Street to record setting hauls of money…..


No bid contracts to dem donors…..


Shutting down the Filibuster and rights of free speech….

Liberals have only one thing they truly care about and that is advancing their ideology.

They will politicize and cry with their selective outrage against anything that they think they can score political points with.

liberals silence while Obama carries out the same instruments of war that they accused Bush of being a War Criminal over using,support of Obama while he sells out Washington to lobbyist and special interest,and their blind allegiance while Obama breaks about every “Hope and Change” promise he made shows just how morally bankrupt and pathetic liberals are.

“How Progressive!!!!!!!”

Baxter Greene on February 26, 2010 at 10:50 AM

Yoop on February 26, 2010 at 10:47 AM

Shep actually discussed the lunch menu. See that? I didn’t see any ham sammiches on it.

Akzed on February 26, 2010 at 10:50 AM

Lemme guess, they were tricked into voting for it by fear mongering from the Bush Administration?

cntrlfrk on February 26, 2010 at 10:50 AM

*crickets*

Doorgunner on February 26, 2010 at 10:51 AM

Liberals freaking out and calling Obama “Hitler” in 5… 4… 3… 2… 1…

1…

1…

Hello?

Daggett on February 26, 2010 at 10:52 AM

Where is this headline: “Patriot Act unexpectedly renewed”?
cyclown on February 26, 2010 at 10:27 AM

Arghh… beat me to it.

connertown on February 26, 2010 at 10:53 AM

Of course the Dems all voted for this…

They know there is a real threat out there that must be dealt with…

the Tea Party movement…

Romeo13 on February 26, 2010 at 10:56 AM

What the hades? Harry Reid said … in very certain language … that he and the democrats had KILLED the Patriot Act several years ago!

HondaV65 on February 26, 2010 at 10:56 AM

…Screw this. Damn you surveillance society! Damn you democrats, damn you republicans…dammit dammit dammit. Next thing I know we’ll be signing that draconian IP treaty and I’ll have to start subverting the government.

ernesto on February 26, 2010 at 10:59 AM

the silence from the libs is more evidence that they would rather politicize national security than actually care about national security.

tommer74 on February 26, 2010 at 10:59 AM

Anyone want to help me make a giant paper-mache Obama head?

Kensington on February 26, 2010 at 11:00 AM

Pinata seems to be the word of the day. When will these pinatas burst!? And what foulness will we find inside?

DINORight on February 26, 2010 at 11:00 AM

crr6 was not available for comment

Doorgunner on February 26, 2010 at 10:49 AM

I’d hide too, after that vintage crr666 performance yesterday, saying it’s perfectly OK to have an idiot for Vice President, as long as the idiot Vice President is a Democrat.

Del Dolemonte on February 26, 2010 at 11:02 AM

Meet the new boss, same as the old boss. While people are desperately concerned about healthcare and the economy, he quietly reauthorizes this piece of jackbootery and the press is to ashamed to call him out on it.

The libtard sites are mostly filled with quiet swims in De Nile, and a few furious posters calling the rest out for trusting in a Chicago crook to repeal the PATRIOT Act.

…you know, I once thought about starting a private library so people wouldn’t have to worry about government goons spying on what they’d been reading.

Dark-Star on February 26, 2010 at 11:03 AM

…Screw this. Damn you surveillance society! Damn you democrats, damn you republicans…dammit dammit dammit. Next thing I know we’ll be signing that draconian IP treaty and I’ll have to start subverting the government.

ernesto on February 26, 2010 at 10:59 AM

“Meltdown in aisle three. Cleanup in aisle three, please.”

Yoop on February 26, 2010 at 11:04 AM

Pinata seems to be the word of the day. When will these pinatas burst!? And what foulness will we find inside?

DINORight on February 26, 2010 at 11:00 AM

Unicorn nuggets?

Yoop on February 26, 2010 at 11:06 AM

ernesto on February 26, 2010 at 10:59 AM

http://www.torproject.org/

It’s not perfect, but it’s a good start.

Dark-Star on February 26, 2010 at 11:08 AM

Dark-Star on February 26, 2010 at 11:08 AM

Tor is a wonderful tool, though its no good for large transfers…and when the authorities get wind of a popular exit node they can still monitor what traffic is leaving the system. Its anonymous, but it wont protect the actual content. I used to have my home set up as an exit node, specifically during the iranian insurrection…that was fun.

ernesto on February 26, 2010 at 11:11 AM

Of course. They always are. Bushitler is making Zero do things he doesn’t want to do.

SouthernGent on February 26, 2010 at 10:18 AM

Of Course we ALL know that Dick Cheney/Halliburton OWNS President Obama. Obama is just a tool of the military industrial complex. They only pretend to be against them, but they cash their secret checks.

If you want proof, who was it that secretly saved Alan Grayson when he got in trouble? Blackwater!</a>

/heavy sarc off

barnone on February 26, 2010 at 11:14 AM

Of course spying on people is okay if you’re a proglibarxist. Otherwise it is the devils tool. Hypocrites.

ClanDerson on February 26, 2010 at 11:36 AM

I (mostly) disagree with the 97 who voted against the renewal of the Patriot Act, but at least I respect their integrity.

Really?

You might want to ask these same 97 whether they condemned Janet Napolitano’s assault on the civil liberties of dissenting Americans in her circular to law enforcement agencies last year. Then you can get back to me about their “integrity.”

rrpjr on February 26, 2010 at 11:39 AM

Gatalife and Grow Fins could not be found for comment…

Scrappy on February 26, 2010 at 11:40 AM

“but at least I respect their integrity.”

even Ed is subject to occasional lapses in judgement

notagool on February 26, 2010 at 11:46 AM

Pinata seems to be the word of the day. When will these pinatas burst!? And what foulness will we find inside?

DINORight on February 26, 2010 at 11:00 AM

“What the!?! These hopey-changey pinatas are full of horse sh!t!”

Kensington on February 26, 2010 at 11:47 AM

More failed policies by George Booosh. /s/

yoda on February 26, 2010 at 11:49 AM

“but at least I respect their integrity.”
even Ed is subject to occasional lapses in judgement
notagool on February 26, 2010 at 11:46 AM

I think he meant “consistency.” But big difference.

rrpjr on February 26, 2010 at 11:49 AM

The House had another opportunity for progressives to do a little piñata-beating on a bill last night — but curiously, it passed with little note or controversy.

On a bill that, among other things, provides for monitoring the cell phones of terrorists. But, when the Obama administration recently floated the idea of monitoring the cell phones of US citizens?

*crickets*

nico on February 26, 2010 at 11:51 AM

Obama is my trampling on our civil liberty Homeboy??

Hello? ACLU please call your office.

Everyone in Hollyweird must still be asleep.

TN Mom on February 26, 2010 at 11:55 AM

breaking New Post Obama Appoints SEIU Union Boss Andy Stern to Deficit Commission http://tiny.cc/ulCsm

Anti-Harkonnen Freedom Fighter on February 26, 2010 at 11:58 AM

It’s no surprise that a big government statist like Obama renewed the Patriot Act. What is a surprise is that conservatives think this is a good thing.

keep the change on February 26, 2010 at 12:05 PM

God save us from Bipartisanship.

Ahh a Lion on February 26, 2010 at 12:06 PM

What is a surprise is that conservatives think this is a good thing.

keep the change on February 26, 2010 at 12:05 PM

Why is that surprising? They’re all for increasing government spy powers so long as it’s (supposedly) done being against TEH EVUL TURRISTS.

Dark-Star on February 26, 2010 at 12:09 PM

I hate to say this, but I have mixed emotions on the patriot act. Especially in the hands of the Obama gang

historian on February 26, 2010 at 12:15 PM

Actually got 10 Republicans to vote against this.

Ahh a Lion on February 26, 2010 at 12:17 PM

Playing politics with national security. It’s the Democrat way.

29Victor on February 26, 2010 at 12:17 PM

Founders did far worse than the Patriot Act, you know the guys who wrote the constitution. See Washington, Adams, Jefferson for a small glimpse.

Plus the Patriot act is filled with Civil Liberty protections, this is all just case in point for 1) its necessity and 2) how it was used as a political wedge against the ignorant(i.e. voters).

Obama comes from the ACLU left for crying out loud. Same group that gave us the Gorelick wall

jp on February 26, 2010 at 12:20 PM

I hate to say this, but I have mixed emotions on the patriot act. Especially in the hands of the Obama gang

historian on February 26, 2010 at 12:15 PM

Its always amused me that the Congress feels free to redefine Rights via Law, when it fits their agenda… (Patriot Act)

Yet can’t do so when it does not… (Roe v Wade, or emminent domain)

Romeo13 on February 26, 2010 at 12:21 PM

I can’t stand the expansion of powers of the government via this act. I wasn’t a Bush-hater type, but I hated this bill.

Still do.

I’m simply amazed by the so-called progressives for not screaming over this.

AnninCA on February 26, 2010 at 12:25 PM

I’m simply amazed by the so-called progressives for not screaming over this.

AnninCA on February 26, 2010 at 12:25 PM

You apprently have no idea what a Progresive is.

This Act gives the State more power… thus the Progresives love it as they want the State to have more power.

They only were against it because Bush wanted it… and you’ll note, that they passed it for Bush, with overwhelming majorities.

Romeo13 on February 26, 2010 at 12:28 PM

It’s dangerous from the warrantless wiretapping to the warrantless records search to being able to sweep anyone up and jail them for 5 years if they choose to defend their Constitutional rights.

The Dean on February 26, 2010 at 12:28 PM

I mean….we should not expect any reasonable privacy, when going about our day….should we?

capejasmine on February 26, 2010 at 10:31 AM

Not at all. And the worst of it is, we do it to ourselves — no government intervention required. When people are spilling their guts on Twitter and Facebook, it hardly matters what the Feds can listen in on.

Ex:
Facebook posting: “My grandpa Johnson is in the hospital again, for a new pacemaker this time. Mom went out to see him last night.”
Gives poster’s mother’s maiden name, often used for authentication when applying for a credit card, etc.

“Going to Las Vegas for spring break! I’m so excited!”
Poster will be traveling out of town. Possible burglary target?

If this sounds far-fetched to you, check out PleaseRobMe.com.

Mary in LA on February 26, 2010 at 12:42 PM

Glenn Greenwald (Don’t flame me too badly) has a good article up about how all the terrible legislation passed over the last decade was overwhelmingly bipartisan. Worth a read.

Ahh a Lion on February 26, 2010 at 12:42 PM

http://pleaserobme.com

Mary in LA on February 26, 2010 at 12:43 PM

BTW, please don’t misunderstand me. I’m not saying it’s *right* for the government to spy on law-abiding citizens, and I’m not trying to argue that the Patriot Act either does or does not allow this. I’m saying that most people don’t do anything to protect their privacy online, and therefore their personal info is hanging out there for anyone — hackers, the Feds, whoever — to see and exploit. Google your own name sometime and see what you get.

Mary in LA on February 26, 2010 at 12:47 PM

Ahh a Lion on February 26, 2010 at 12:42 PM

Love your nic! :-)

Mary in LA on February 26, 2010 at 12:50 PM

Re: Mary in LA
I think the big difference is that people are giving up their privacy intentionally via social networking. Whereas we all have an expectation of privacy when it comes to our phone calls, emails, credit card transactions, and health records. If that expectation is broken due to an overzealous government, then there are real concerns about oversight and civil liberties.

Ahh a Lion on February 26, 2010 at 12:54 PM

HA

darii on February 26, 2010 at 1:06 PM

After all the progressive drum beating on how evil the patriot act is, how did Bush get this passed in the house again?

JakeRightThought on February 26, 2010 at 1:06 PM

After all the progressive drum beating on how evil the patriot act is, how did Bush get this passed in the house again?

Progressive might beat the drum for civil liberties publicly, but privately they are for anything that makes government more powerful. Bush got a lot done when it came to expanding government power. The one thing I can remember that he failed at was the Social Security overhaul which, guess what, would have removed some government control over that ponzi scheme.

Ahh a Lion on February 26, 2010 at 1:10 PM

The patriot act is the most abominable, unconstitutional and hateful (from the point of freedom) piece of legislation since the alien and sedition act.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gFVQ0HZz2mc
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=97099

nazo311 on February 26, 2010 at 1:30 PM

Maybe Obama should take note.

Bush is still bringing Republicans and Democrats together in a bipartisan effort….a year after he’s left office.

Obama can’t even bring all the Democrats together in a partisan effort.

PappaMac on February 26, 2010 at 1:51 PM

Comment pages: 1 2