Mitch Daniels considering 2012 Presidential bid?

posted at 3:35 pm on February 26, 2010 by Ed Morrissey

Is there room for another conservative Republican executive in the 2012 sweepstakes?  Politico’s Jonathan Martin reports that Indiana Governor Mitch Daniels, who turned down an opportunity to run for the Senate seat being vacated by Evan Bayh, has stopped denying interest in the top job.  That could mean a serious bid from the man who could be called the Un-Obama:

After months of Shermanesque denials, Indiana GOP Gov. Mitch Daniels’ admission that he’s now willing to consider a White House run has roused his long-standing, if unofficial, fan club.

Republican admirers from Washington, Indiana and elsewhere, hoping to encourage their favorite Hoosier, are out in force to make the case that a balding, blunt, unprepossessing, listed-at-5-foot-7 policy wonk would be a strong contender to take on President Barack Obama. Their shorthand is that he’s the un-Obama. If the country has soured on a charismatic orator who brought glamour but little executive experience to the presidency, the thinking goes, then Daniels could provide the antidote. …

At 60, Daniels’s résumé is exhaustive: He’s a Princeton-educated former Senate chief of staff-turned political operative-turned think tank chief-turned Fortune 500 executive-turned White House budget director-turned two-term governor.

And since winning the governorship in 2004, he has practiced the sort of fiscal conservatism that he preached as “The Blade” during his tenure as President George W. Bush’s head of the Office of Management and Budget.

“Mitch is the real thing,” said Nancy Dorn, his deputy at OMB and now the head of General Electric Co.’s Washington office. “He’s a true fiscal conservative.”

He has cut spending, cut taxes, leased the state’s toll road to a private company for billions and expanded health insurance and prescription drug access in a market-friendly way. The result is an approval rating of 70 percent, according to one recent survey, placing him among the country’s most popular governors.

Undoubtedly, Republicans need to offer someone from outside of Washington in a season of discontent with Beltway business as usual.  The strongest candidates will be former governors like Sarah Palin, Mike Huckabee, Mitt Romney, Tim Pawlenty, and perhaps Haley Barbour.  Mitch Daniels may have the strongest resume from among them, as Martin details, and perhaps also the most unequivocally conservative track record as an executive.

That’s the good news.  The bad news is that Daniels is the Un-Obama also in the charisma department.  He has a strong grasp of policy, but as with most policy wonks, has trouble when it comes to electrifying the masses from the stump.  That hasn’t hindered him in Indiana, much like a similar problem didn’t keep Tommy Thompson from multiple statewide wins in Wisconsin.  However, on the national stage, it could prove to be an obstacle, as voters like to identify personally with presidential candidates.

Or, perhaps not.  Barack Obama was one of the most charismatic candidates since Bill Clinton, but his performance in office has been rated as increasingly poor by the voters.  An Un-Obama may be the right prescription in 2012 — a man with broad experience in governing and a solid track record in reducing government.  Competence may beat charm after three years of Hope and Change.  At the least, a Daniels primary campaign will force Republicans to adhere to fiscal conservatism and economic liberty as the main principles driving the election.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

OT: 6-0 USA Hockey v Finland 1st period!!!

d1carter on February 26, 2010 at 3:37 PM

Room for one more? Why the heck not. There’s time enough, if he uses it wisely, to position himself.

IronDioPriest on February 26, 2010 at 3:38 PM

Never heard of him. Then again I though Lamar Alexander was a black basketball player until yesterday.

Caper29 on February 26, 2010 at 3:39 PM

I liked that commencement speech he gave a while back, lambasting his generation.

ernesto on February 26, 2010 at 3:39 PM

Go for it. Anybody but Mitt and Huck.

Rocks on February 26, 2010 at 3:39 PM

The bad news is that Daniels is the Un-Obama also in the charisma department.

Yeah, unlike your guy Tim Pawlenty. Ha ha ha

And those candidates with charisma, well, we just can’t have those, either.

DaydreamBeliever on February 26, 2010 at 3:39 PM

Not unless he does a 180º turn. There was an article here in Indiana the day before yesterday and he basically said he was keeping the door open just to keep people from hounding him about it. He said he’s never once seen a POTUS staring back at him in his bathroom mirror.

Oink on February 26, 2010 at 3:41 PM

get on in there Mitch. Scuff some dudes up—start with Romney. A little scuffing up now and then makes a stronger candidate. A failure to get scuffed up gets us the current seat warmer.

ted c on February 26, 2010 at 3:41 PM

The bad news is that Daniels is the Un-Obama also in the charisma department. He has a strong grasp of policy, but as with most policy wonks, has trouble when it comes to electrifying the masses from the stump. That hasn’t hindered him in Indiana, much like a similar problem didn’t keep Tommy Thompson from multiple statewide wins in Wisconsin

–Wasn’t that sort of a backhanded insult to people from Indiana and Wisconsin?

Jimbo3 on February 26, 2010 at 3:42 PM

Mitch Daniels has a great record, from what I’ve read. The WSJ has covered him very favorably, if that means anything.

DaydreamBeliever on February 26, 2010 at 3:42 PM

I love Mitch! He’s been great for our state. I don’t know how good of a Presidential candidate he would be quite yet…but he’s been an A+ for Indiana as governor!

search4truth on February 26, 2010 at 3:42 PM

Great News. Now this is a candidate I can support.

antisocial on February 26, 2010 at 3:43 PM

The more the merrier. We need choices. Let them be heard and let them be heard from often and as early as possible.

We have a lot of weeding to do to get to the best candidate.

ConservativeTony on February 26, 2010 at 3:43 PM

Palin-Daniels 2012. :)

irishspy on February 26, 2010 at 3:43 PM

Currently Mitch Daniels is my top choice… followed by Pawlenty…

I really wish all the people from 2008 would bow out already…

ninjapirate on February 26, 2010 at 3:44 PM

hasn’t hindered him in Indiana, much like a similar problem didn’t keep Tommy Thompson from multiple statewide wins in Wisconsin. However, on the national stage, it could prove to be an obstacle, as voters like to identify personally with presidential candidates.

I’m with Jimbo3 on this one….that sounds a little like a shot at us simple folk. Maybe bad word choice?

search4truth on February 26, 2010 at 3:44 PM

As a Hoosier I am biased, but if Daniels runs and Palin doesn’t, I’ll break out the “My Man, Mitch” bumper stickers again.

SKYFOX on February 26, 2010 at 3:44 PM

YES!!!!!!!!!

Welcome into the ring Mitch!

katy on February 26, 2010 at 3:44 PM

In a year or so there will be lots of candidates from both parties running as the un-obozo.

txag92 on February 26, 2010 at 3:44 PM

I know nothing about this person. Guess I’ll have to do some research.

Enoxo on February 26, 2010 at 3:44 PM

At least it sounds like he knows 2+2=4, not like this bho 2+2=6! The fuzzy math is not going anyplace with the voters. I do not know much about him and it is early.
L

letget on February 26, 2010 at 3:44 PM

Wasn’t that sort of a backhanded insult to people from Indiana and Wisconsin?

Jimbo3 on February 26, 2010 at 3:42 PM

I didn’t see much backhand, more of a lob really.

Rocks on February 26, 2010 at 3:45 PM

Personal note to GOP:

MORE POLICY WONKS! More Daniels’s and Ryans…give us bland policy prescriptions and public private partnerships that WORK! No more platitudes!

ernesto on February 26, 2010 at 3:46 PM

“At the least, a Daniels primary campaign will force Republicans to adhere to fiscal conservatism and economic liberty as the main principles driving the election.”

All the more reasons for him to run…

Jump on in, the water is fine!

Seven Percent Solution on February 26, 2010 at 3:46 PM

I don’t wanna be shallow, but no one with a dome like that will be elected President. Vice President, maybe. But not President.

Doughboy on February 26, 2010 at 3:46 PM

Oink on February 26, 2010 at 3:41 PM

Whereas Obooba has seen King of the Universe in the mirror for 20+ years.

Akzed on February 26, 2010 at 3:47 PM

I’m with Jimbo3 on this one….that sounds a little like a shot at us simple folk. Maybe bad word choice?

search4truth on February 26, 2010 at 3:44 PM

It was meant as a compliment; Indiana and Wisconsin voters don’t get blinded by charisma.

Ed Morrissey on February 26, 2010 at 3:48 PM

I don’t wanna be shallow, but no one with a dome like that will be elected President. Vice President, maybe. But not President.

Doughboy on February 26, 2010 at 3:46 PM

He just needs to visit Plugs Biden’s doctor.

txag92 on February 26, 2010 at 3:48 PM

ernesto on February 26, 2010 at 3:46 PM

I agree. If us silly folks from Indiana and Wisconsin are belittled for following ‘policy wonks’ that govern responsibly instead of empty suits that give you leg tingles…well, so be it. Guilty as charged.

search4truth on February 26, 2010 at 3:48 PM

Thanks, Ed…I figured it was misunderstood!!! :)

search4truth on February 26, 2010 at 3:49 PM

d1carter on February 26, 2010 at 3:37 PM

U-S-A!!!!!! Kane with two goals so far!

jbh45 on February 26, 2010 at 3:49 PM

–Wasn’t that sort of a backhanded insult to people from Indiana and Wisconsin?

Jimbo3 on February 26, 2010

Ed doesn’t see us as culturally sophisticated like those urbane meatsicles up in MN.

SKYFOX on February 26, 2010 at 3:50 PM

one of the most obvious reasons that McCain lost (I’m not trying to start a big debate here) is because he looks old.

Mitch Daniels is great, but I don’t think he looks young & snazzy enough.

hey, looks matter–its just a fact.

kelley in virginia on February 26, 2010 at 3:50 PM

Who?

CP on February 26, 2010 at 3:50 PM

Daniels has done a great job governing Indiana. I don’t know if he has the charisma to be elected President, but he would definitely do a great job as President. He’s definitely a substance-over-style kind of guy.

gyc on February 26, 2010 at 3:50 PM

An Un-Obama may be the right prescription in 2012

I believe that Americans like to vote for a person whose personality trait is the opposite of the most glarying personality issue of the current office holder.

HW Bush was bland => Vote in Clinton with charisma
Clinton is morally adrift => W Bush is on the straight and narrow
W Bush perceived as unbending => Obama is a blank screen to project what you want
Obama is all talk to no go => Mitch is all go and no talk

C’mon Mitch, we need your presence in the primaries.

WashJeff on February 26, 2010 at 3:50 PM

Mitch Daniels commencement speech part 1 May 2009

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zsMUXcy_-Os&feature=player_embedded

katy on February 26, 2010 at 3:51 PM

He just needs to visit Plugs Biden’s doctor.

txag92 on February 26, 2010 at 3:48 PM

Like I said, he can run for Vice President(as Biden successfully did), but not President. Appearance matters. There’s hasn’t been a folically-challenged Prez since Eisenhower. The lack of charisma only stacks the deck even higher against him.

Doughboy on February 26, 2010 at 3:51 PM

I moved here just in time to vote for him in 2008, and haven’t regretted it. I could see him sitting in the Oval Office, and performing admirably.

Getting there would be the challenge, though. The charisma issue has been addressed, and as an early Fred! fan I’m personally leery of “drafted” candidates this time around.

Stuff like this (from the article) doesn’t ease that concern:

It was that same penchant for candor that caused quite a stir in Republican circles when, last week at the National Governors Association Conference, Daniels told the Washington Post’s Dan Balz — in what those close to the governor said were impromptu comments — that, after hearing from many individuals pleading for him to run, he would “stay open to the idea.”

Later in the week, in a sitdown with a group of Washington reporters, he fanned the speculation about his ambitions by continuing to leave the door open.

“The simple fact is, I don’t plan to do it, I don’t expect to do it and I really don’t want to do it,” Daniels said.

cs89 on February 26, 2010 at 3:51 PM

It was meant as a compliment; Indiana and Wisconsin voters don’t get blinded by charisma.

Ed Morrissey on February 26, 2010 at 3:48 PM

Thanks for the clarification…meatsicle.

SKYFOX on February 26, 2010 at 3:51 PM

It was meant as a compliment; Indiana and Wisconsin voters don’t get blinded by charisma.

Ed Morrissey on February 26, 2010 at 3:48 PM

C’mon Ed, I used to live in MN and we all know Wisconsin-ites are blinded by that stuff that they drink from their backyards stills.

jbh45 on February 26, 2010 at 3:52 PM

Hadn’t really considered him before, but yes, this is the type of candidate the Republican party needs for 2012.

He hits all the right notes here and has plenty charisma for a presidential candidate – he looks and sounds “presidential”:

Mitch Daniels on national issues
Mitch Daniels on Cap-And-Trade

modifiedcontent on February 26, 2010 at 3:52 PM

I’m with Jimbo3 on this one….that sounds a little like a shot at us simple folk. Maybe bad word choice?

search4truth on February 26, 2010 at 3:44 PM
It was meant as a compliment; Indiana and Wisconsin voters don’t get blinded by charisma.

Ed Morrissey on February 26, 2010 at 3:48 PM

Oh, thanks for informing us that instead of being insulted we are being complimented. LOL.

Reminder to all – Mike Pence is also from Indiana. Proud to say he’s my Rep.

There are some people in Indiana who dislike Mitch Daniels and pretty much all they can say is “Ditch Mitch.” It was a bumper-sticker talking point during his last campaign.

Oink on February 26, 2010 at 3:52 PM

ZzzzzzzzzzZ

Yeah, that is what we need, another Ivy League GW Bush Clone Budget Bureaucrat.

Norwegian on February 26, 2010 at 3:52 PM

Ooooooh, a 70 percent approval rate.

Sarah Palin’s was in the high 80s, I believe, when she was tapped for VP. But I digress. I mean, how could we ever consider her? She doesn’t have the right “equipment,” IYKWIMAITTYD.

sabu on February 26, 2010 at 3:52 PM

OT: 6-0 USA Hockey v Finland 1st period!!!

d1carter on February 26, 2010 at 3:37 PM

How did they miss the extra point kick?

WashJeff on February 26, 2010 at 3:52 PM

i agree doughboy.

kelley in virginia on February 26, 2010 at 3:53 PM

There are some people in Indiana who dislike Mitch Daniels and pretty much all they can say is “Ditch Mitch.” It was a bumper-sticker talking point during his last campaign.

Oink on February 26, 2010 at 3:52 PM

Probably people that had their government union disbanded by MItch.

WashJeff on February 26, 2010 at 3:54 PM

Like I said, he can run for Vice President(as Biden successfully did), but not President. Appearance matters. There’s hasn’t been a folically-challenged Prez since Eisenhower. The lack of charisma only stacks the deck even higher against him.

Doughboy on February 26, 2010 at 3:51 PM

I don’t care if our next POTUS is bald as a cue or has a bright green mowhawk ‘do as long as he’s conservative.

Oink on February 26, 2010 at 3:54 PM

Shhhh…don’t tell Allah:

Daniels not a big atheists fan.

Rocks on February 26, 2010 at 3:54 PM

He seems to have his priorities right:

Mitch Daniels on Free Enterprise

modifiedcontent on February 26, 2010 at 3:55 PM

Daniels is good. Might be a little too tied to the Bush White House though (like it or not, that’s a big liability politically)

BuzzCrutcher on February 26, 2010 at 3:55 PM

Sarah Palin’s was in the high 80s, I believe, when she was tapped for VP. But I digress. I mean, how could we ever consider her? She doesn’t have the right “equipment,” IYKWIMAITTYD.

sabu on February 26, 2010 at 3:52 PM

To be fair, attaining 80+% approval among a population of under 1,000,000 is a little different that attaining 70+ in a state with…you know, actual urban centers and the like.

ernesto on February 26, 2010 at 3:56 PM

Who?

CP on February 26, 2010 at 3:50 PM

Never heard of him. Then again I though Lamar Alexander was a black basketball player until yesterday.

Caper29 on February 26, 2010 at 3:39 PM

There once was a senator from Illinois that nobody had heard of except for a 2004 speech.

Dr.Cwac.Cwac on February 26, 2010 at 3:56 PM

Probably people that had their government union disbanded by MItch.

WashJeff on February 26, 2010 at 3:54 PM

Ding ding ding ding!!!! What do we have for our winner, Wink?

search4truth on February 26, 2010 at 3:56 PM

Doughboy on February 26, 2010 at 3:51 PM

I think this country has matured quickly from that standard. As Obama destroys the country, someone like Mitch Daniels has a better chance of winning the WH than in any other time in history!

katy on February 26, 2010 at 3:56 PM

Never heard of him. Then again I though Lamar Alexander was a black basketball player until yesterday.

I am glad I am not the only one that thought that before the summit yesterday.

Daniels/Ryan?

I would love the debates for the next election Daniels/Ryan with boxes of documents and calculators and Obama/Biden with sad letters about how unfair the US is…

Jussi on February 26, 2010 at 3:57 PM

He’s going to have to get through Ron Paul first. This time, the Revolution Will be televised! – when we destroy Mitt Romney’s political career.

The Dean on February 26, 2010 at 3:57 PM

I think I just pulled the reverse blockquote – impressive!

Jussi on February 26, 2010 at 3:58 PM

“The simple fact is, I don’t plan to do it, I don’t expect to do it and I really don’t want to do it,” Daniels said.

cs89 on February 26, 2010 at 3:51 PM

That’s exactly what we need in a president. Not someone who really wants the job just so he can fundamentally transform America.

rbj on February 26, 2010 at 3:58 PM

I don’t care if our next POTUS is bald as a cue or has a bright green mowhawk ‘do as long as he’s conservative.

Oink on February 26, 2010 at 3:54 PM

I agree. It’s the substance that matters. If there’s one lesson I hope Americans take from Obama, it’s that. But we live in an era(and have for some time) where style is very important:

Reagan was a former actor turned politician who was a great communicator. Clinton was a charismatic, young, decent-looking guy who connected with most Americans. Dubya was inarticulate, but had a certain aura of realness to him that Gore severely lacked(could you imagine Gore giving the same speech to Congress following 9/11?). And Obama…well we don’t need to beat that dead horse yet again.

The one dull, old dude in the last 30 years to get elected President was Bush 41, and that was mostly due to Reagan’s success and Dukakis’ horrible campaign.

Doughboy on February 26, 2010 at 4:00 PM

Daniels/Ryan?

I would love the debates for the next election Daniels/Ryan with boxes of documents and calculators and Obama/Biden with sad letters about how unfair the US is…

Jussi on February 26, 2010 at 3:57 PM

I’d work for a Daniels/Ryan campaign. The only 2 GOP policy wonks I’ve ever seen, they’re JUST the kind of politician for whom i’d enthusiastically work. We’ve been in desperate need of principled policy experts at the top who have the obvious grasp and intellect necessary to direct the federal government in a responsible direction. Bush, Obama, Clinton…they’re all far too reliant on advisors to “show them the way”…it looks to me like Daniels and Ryan adhere to the policy positions they do because they know them inside and out. We need that.

ernesto on February 26, 2010 at 4:00 PM

The more, the merrier! At least this one has some respectable executive experience.

NoLeftTurn on February 26, 2010 at 4:00 PM

Okay Ed, insult the rest of us then;)

CCRWM on February 26, 2010 at 4:00 PM

Ooo boy?—Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels Praises Mexican Invasion
http://oneoldvet.com/?p=10146

By admission of the Indiana Committee of Hispanic and Latino Affairs, the vast majority, upwards of 80% of the town of Frankfort, Indiana are ILLEGAL alien invaders from Mexico!

Daniels, the protege of Republican Senator Dick Lugar, a strong supporter of ILLEGALS and mouthpiece for La Raza himself, has rebuffed all attempts of the Indiana Legislature to hold businesses who hire ILLEGALS accountable for their crimes against America. -snip-

lilspitfire on February 26, 2010 at 4:02 PM

It really doesn’t matter what most Hoosiers think of Mitch Daniels. By the time the primaries come to Indiana, Romney and the Huckster will have gamed the system and Daniels will be a distant memory.

SKYFOX on February 26, 2010 at 4:02 PM

Great. Another Bush crony. He’s being pushed to keep the Bush influence alive, don’t you know? Just like Jindal.

promachus on February 26, 2010 at 4:03 PM

modifiedcontent on February 26, 2010 at 3:55 PM

Yep. He’s made it so that in Michigan they don’t say “Fear India”. People in Michigan say “Fear Indiana”. I was born are raised, went to college, got married and had my first child in Michigan. We moved to Indiana after Pfizer “acquired” Pharmacia (Upjohn) in Kalamazoo. My wife was immediately hired by Eli Lilly after she was let go from Pfizer (previously a Pharmacia employee). We have been in Indiana for 6 years and have no desire to go back to Michigan. It would require and radical transformation of the state back to conservative policies.

Heck, my father-in-law passed away 6 months ago, and my mother-in-law is retiring after teaching at a public school in Michigan for 35 years. She is 62 years old. Guess where she is retiring to? Yep. Indiana. She wants to live in a better economic climate where he pension dollars won’t be taken away by Michigan’s confiscatory tax policy.

Dr.Cwac.Cwac on February 26, 2010 at 4:03 PM

Mitch would only electrify the electorate if they wired the seats in the audience as the did for the movie “The Tingler“.

Let him add his voice to the fray, but he’s going nowhere with his turgid delivery skills.

profitsbeard on February 26, 2010 at 4:04 PM

And since winning the governorship in 2004, he has practiced the sort of fiscal conservatism that he preached as “The Blade” during his tenure as President George W. Bush’s head of the Office of Management and Budget.

Now explain to me how being a part of Bush’s Budget Management makes Daniels an asset consideration when conservatives stayed home in 2006 BECAUSE of Bush’s spending policies?

Rovin on February 26, 2010 at 4:05 PM

How about Daniels/Pence 2012!!

The Fiscal Responsibility twins.

It was meant as a compliment; Indiana and Wisconsin voters don’t get blinded by charisma.

Ed Morrissey on February 26, 2010 at 3:48 PM

I wouldn’t go that far, after all Obama did win Indiana.

Having met the man during campaign events several times, I happen to believe he has plenty of charisma. Not the spit and polished kind, but a down to earth authenticity. He’s the first politician I’ve met who didn’t remind me of a slimy used car salesman.

More about him:
http://www.mymanmitch.com/about_mitch.html
http://www.in.gov/gov/2635.htm

Keith_Indy on February 26, 2010 at 4:05 PM

Great. Another Bush crony. He’s being pushed to keep the Bush influence alive, don’t you know? Just like Jindal.

promachus on February 26, 2010 at 4:03 PM

Crony, yes. Clone, no.

SKYFOX on February 26, 2010 at 4:05 PM

It was meant as a compliment; Indiana and Wisconsin voters don’t get blinded by charisma.

Ed Morrissey on February 26, 2010 at 3:48 PM
C’mon Ed, I used to live in MN and we all know Wisconsin-ites are blinded by that stuff that they drink from their backyards stills.

jbh45 on February 26, 2010 at 3:52 PM

–It’s not just the stuff in the backyard stills. I was once in a town in Wisconsin that was so small it only had two bars.

Jimbo3 on February 26, 2010 at 4:06 PM

He’s going to have to get through Ron Paul first. This time, the Revolution Will be televised! – when we destroy Mitt Romney’s political career.

The Dean on February 26, 2010 at 3:57 PM

Good luck storming the castle!

Fallen Sparrow on February 26, 2010 at 4:06 PM

We love Mitch in Indiana. No, he isn’t Hollywood handsome and no, he doesn’t exactly give leg-tingling speeches, but he’s genuine and straight-talking and honest to the core. Charisma is very much overrated, in my view.

As an aside, I very much doubt Mitch would have trouble ‘getting through Ron Paul’ (per The Dean, above). Paul is a whackjob, a crank, the Lyndon Larouche of the GOP, an embarrassment. My cat is more well qualified for the Presidency than Ron Paul.

troyriser_gopftw on February 26, 2010 at 4:07 PM

The only 2 GOP policy wonks I’ve ever seen, they’re JUST the kind of politician for whom i’d enthusiastically work.

ernesto on February 26, 2010 at 4:00 PM

Do not put up any Che posters in the campaign office. That will look bad. ;-)

WashJeff on February 26, 2010 at 4:08 PM

Yep. He’s made it so that in Michigan they don’t say “Fear India”. People in Michigan say “Fear Indiana”. I was born are raised, went to college, got married and had my first child in Michigan. We moved to Indiana after Pfizer “acquired” Pharmacia (Upjohn) in Kalamazoo. My wife was immediately hired by Eli Lilly after she was let go from Pfizer (previously a Pharmacia employee). We have been in Indiana for 6 years and have no desire to go back to Michigan. It would require and radical transformation of the state back to conservative policies.

Heck, my father-in-law passed away 6 months ago, and my mother-in-law is retiring after teaching at a public school in Michigan for 35 years. She is 62 years old. Guess where she is retiring to? Yep. Indiana. She wants to live in a better economic climate where he pension dollars won’t be taken away by Michigan’s confiscatory tax policy.

Dr.Cwac.Cwac on February 26, 2010 at 4:03 PM

–I wonder if we crossed paths in the Battle Creek/Kalamazoo area.

Jimbo3 on February 26, 2010 at 4:08 PM

Great. Another Bush crony. He’s being pushed to keep the Bush influence alive, don’t you know? Just like Jindal.

promachus on February 26, 2010 at 4:03 PM

Where’d you come from?

Oink on February 26, 2010 at 4:08 PM

promachus on February 26, 2010 at 4:03 PM

Exactly. Was he even fiscally conservative in the Bush White House. I don’t remember Bush ever being fiscally conservative, even during his first year. It’s like people saying Tom Campbell in CA is fiscally conservative, but when the guy worked for Arnold, he was a liberal. If we want a real fiscal conservative, go with Coburn, Demint, Ryan. Maybe Romney but really he can’t be trusted.

TimTebowSavesAmerica on February 26, 2010 at 4:08 PM

I was once in a town in Wisconsin that was so small it only had two bars.

Jimbo3 on February 26, 2010 at 4:06 PM

You LIE!!! ;-)

WashJeff on February 26, 2010 at 4:08 PM

lilspitfire on February 26, 2010 at 4:02 PM

Typical of the Bush dynasty to reingeneer the country. Their calculation is that Hispanic vote will decrease the importance of White Southern vote which will make sure that Rockefeller wing of the party is ascendant.

promachus on February 26, 2010 at 4:09 PM

Forget it, he has no community organizing experience.

rjoco1 on February 26, 2010 at 4:09 PM

This guy could go places. He is a TRUE conservative on all three major policy areas, but he comes across as non-threatening. I think if you were to draw up a candidate who could unite right and center on POLICY, this is your man. I think I like him best of any of the \’12 contenders. His speech lambasting the baby boomers while many of them sat in academic robes behind him at Butler\’s graduation ceremony is must-watch conservative speechmaking at its finest.Daniels is the guy. But as someone noted, he doesn\’t go real big for atheism, so AP is bound to have a chip on his shoulder covering him, I just know it.

bcm4134 on February 26, 2010 at 4:09 PM

Exactly. Was he even fiscally conservative in the Bush White House. I don’t remember Bush ever being fiscally conservative, even during his first year. It’s like people saying Tom Campbell in CA is fiscally conservative, but when the guy worked for Arnold, he was a liberal. If we want a real fiscal conservative, go with Coburn, Demint, Ryan. Maybe Romney but really he can’t be trusted.

TimTebowSavesAmerica on February 26, 2010 at 4:08 PM

Remember, it was still ultimately up to Congress and the POTUS to spend, spend, spend.

Oink on February 26, 2010 at 4:10 PM

Do not put up any Che posters in the campaign office. That will look bad. ;-)

WashJeff on February 26, 2010 at 4:08 PM

You know i was completely unaware that Che’s name was actually Ernesto until I started coming here and people started acting like I chose the name because I like Che and not because its my actual name!

ernesto on February 26, 2010 at 4:10 PM

rbj on February 26, 2010 at 3:58 PM

I agree that would be nice to have. In fact, that was one of my arguments for Fred- He didn’t seem to have a compelling personal need to be President. Maybe being reactive, but I wonder if “drafting” candidates will be successful now.

If Daniels wants it and can pull it off, I’ll gladly vote for him over Obama or Clinton.

cs89 on February 26, 2010 at 4:10 PM

Forget it, he has no community organizing experience.

rjoco1 on February 26, 2010 at 4:09 PM

Oh, well crap! Next!

Oink on February 26, 2010 at 4:11 PM

I would happily welcome him to the 2012 primary discussion.

myrenovations on February 26, 2010 at 4:11 PM

TimTebowSavesAmerica on February 26, 2010 at 4:08 PM

I am guessing here. Bush’s initial budgets were fiscally conservative, but he chose not to put pressure on his party to tow the line on reduced spending.

WashJeff on February 26, 2010 at 4:11 PM

ernesto on February 26, 2010 at 4:10 PM

I am not going to google it, is in not Che Guerevo?

I had no clue Ernesto was in his name.

Just in case…I was jus’ jokin’ with you.

WashJeff on February 26, 2010 at 4:13 PM

promachus on February 26, 2010 at 4:09 PM

*facepalm*

search4truth on February 26, 2010 at 4:14 PM

I am guessing here. Bush’s initial budgets were fiscally conservative, but he chose not to put pressure on his party to tow the line on reduced spending.

WashJeff on February 26, 2010 at 4:11 PM

Hardly. During Daniels’ stint as OMB Chief, the federal budget deficit skyrocketed from a near breakeven in 2001 to a $500B deficit in 2003.

Norwegian on February 26, 2010 at 4:15 PM

WashJeff on February 26, 2010 at 4:13 PM

I know you were joking, but some people really think its an allusion to Che. When i say its not, they’re like “oh cmon you’re totally some well of skinny white boy with a goatee and a che shirt”…people say the funniest sh*t here sometimes :D

ernesto on February 26, 2010 at 4:15 PM

Oh, please. Please, please, please. Love Mitch. He’s been the best thing to happen to this state in decades. He took us from a deficient (16 years of Dem leadership for ya) to a pretty decent surplus.

For all the “he’s just a Bush crony” types, Mitch also worked for Reagan. Just sayin’.

And, unlike Congress, when Gov. Daniels had to deny any State employee raises due to the economy, he also forwent his. Said it wasn’t right for him to take a raise when no one else could.

Yes, Obama won this State, but barely. Daniels won by a pretty significant margin.

lonesome_pine on February 26, 2010 at 4:16 PM

Yep. He’s made it so that in Michigan they don’t say “Fear India”. People in Michigan say “Fear Indiana” …
Dr.Cwac.Cwac on February 26, 2010 at 4:03 PM

That kind of endorsement counts to me. To be honest, I’m tired of hearing about conservatism and even fiscal responsibility; the Republican party needs someone who can go beyond that, someone who understands free enterprise and what it means to American culture, the importance of manufacturing and how to bring business back to the US.

modifiedcontent on February 26, 2010 at 4:16 PM

Hardly. During Daniels’ stint as OMB Chief, the federal budget deficit skyrocketed from a near breakeven in 2001 to a $500B deficit in 2003.

Norwegian on February 26, 2010 at 4:15 PM

Kinda hard to keep them from skyrocketing when your political bosses keep moving the goal posts. Deferred taxes, medicare part D, etc etc…these were not things an OMB director can simply reject

ernesto on February 26, 2010 at 4:17 PM

There once was a senator from Illinois that nobody had heard of except for a 2004 speech.

Dr.Cwac.Cwac on February 26, 2010 at 3:56 PM

If a Senator makes a speech, and no one hears it except C-span junkies, did the speech actually happen?

RINO in Name Only on February 26, 2010 at 4:18 PM

Another plus is, he’s very good at discussing policy. He can talk to people about policy without talking down to them, or acting professorial.

That would be a big plus in the debates. He can quickly go into specifics when need to bolster general policy directions.

Keith_Indy on February 26, 2010 at 4:18 PM

How come Indiana turned Blue in 2008?

I like the guy but I’m wonder how a Red state like Indiana turned Blue.

roux on February 26, 2010 at 4:18 PM

Norwegian on February 26, 2010 at 4:15 PM

Don’t have the numbers in front of me instantly, but wasn’t there a little incident that ended up ramping up the budget for defense/security? I think it was in NYC…

cs89 on February 26, 2010 at 4:18 PM

Comment pages: 1 2