Inital jobless claims rise …

posted at 10:55 am on February 25, 2010 by Ed Morrissey

The AP gets to use its favorite adverb again, and this time it’s even more ridiculous when reading the spin on the latest unemployment news.  Initial jobless claims rose again last week, and as the AP explains, it probably comes in part with the massive snowstorm that blanketed the mid-Atlantic region.  But if that’s the case, then why would they describe it with the word “unexpectedly” (via HA reader DogSoldier and JWF) ?

The number of new claims for unemployment benefits jumped unexpectedly last week as heavy snows caused layoffs to rise.

In addition, many state agencies in the mid-Atlantic and New England regions that process the claims were closed due to the storms and are now clearing out backlogs, a Labor Department analyst said.

The department said Thursday that first-time claims for unemployment insurance rose by 22,000 to a seasonally adjusted 496,000. Wall Street analysts polled by Thomson Reuters expected a drop to 455,000.

Bad weather can cause job losses in construction and other industries sensitive to weather.

That much is true.  Construction workers laid off from stalled projects can claim unemployment until the employer and/or customer is ready to resume.  Since that’s the case, one might have expected the number of jobless claims to increase, especially considering the severity of the storm and the inability of cities to clear the streets.  Washington DC had to shut down for most of a week because of the weather.

So why didn’t the geniuses that the media love to quote “expect” this?

However, not everyone is convinced that the weather is the primary motivator for the rise in joblessness.  The stock market dropped sharply after the announcement (via Geoff A):

Stocks opened sharply lower Thursday after the government said weekly jobless claims ramped up more than expected last week.

The Dow was down more than 150 points at the open. All 30 components were lower, led by Coca-Cola [KO  53.21    -1.95  (-3.54%)   ], Caterpillar [CAT  55.16    -1.80  (-3.16%)   ] and American Express [AXP  37.46    -0.95  (-2.47%)   ].

The Labor Department reported that the number of workers filing jobless claims jumped to 496,000, well ahead of estimates of 455,000. Though the government said some of the increase could have been due to a backlog of claims processing due to inclement East Coast weather, the trend was enough to rattle markets.

The problem with the snow explanation is that this is not just a one-week anomaly.  The four-week average of initial jobless claims has risen by 30,000 over the last month, a trend that indicates that more businesses have continued cutbacks.  On Tuesday, the Bureau of Labor Statistics announced a sudden and significant increase in mass layoff events for January:

Employers took 1,761 mass layoff actions in January that resulted in the separation of 182,261 workers, seasonally adjusted, as measured by new filings for unemployment insurance benefits during the month, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Each action involved at least 50 persons from a single employer. Both mass layoff events and initial claims increased from the prior month after four consecutive over-the-month decreases. In January, 486 mass layoff events were reported in the manufacturing sector, seasonally adjusted, resulting in 62,556 initial claims. Both figures increased over the month–the first increases since August 2009 for events and since September 2009 for initial claims. (See table 1.)

That doesn’t come from heavy snowfalls, but from a persistently negative outlook on economic growth.  Businesses are still paring back their staffs and reluctant to commit cash to payroll, nor capital to expansion.  The market is recognizing that today.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Obama’s legacy.

daesleeper on February 25, 2010 at 10:57 AM

They used that word again? How unexpected.

rbj on February 25, 2010 at 10:58 AM

UNEXPECTEDLY!

riverrat10k on February 25, 2010 at 11:01 AM

These numbers are only unexpected by sycophants and kool aid drinkers who still believe Keynes was right.

King of the Britons on February 25, 2010 at 11:01 AM

Closing in on 8 months, personally. Wheee.

TexasDan on February 25, 2010 at 11:01 AM

Gee, I don’t recall the AP making excuses when bad things happened during the Bush years, I wonder why this policy has changed?

NoDonkey on February 25, 2010 at 11:01 AM

Danny Choo!

Asher on February 25, 2010 at 11:03 AM

Closing in on 8 months, personally. Wheee.

TexasDan on February 25, 2010 at 11:01 AM

Ugh. :(

Midas on February 25, 2010 at 11:03 AM

Unexpectedly unexpected.

crazy_legs on February 25, 2010 at 11:05 AM

Yeah…I can’t wait for the next totally ‘unexpected’ increase in unemployment…probably because the weather is too mild.

AUINSC on February 25, 2010 at 11:05 AM

Duh.

NebCon on February 25, 2010 at 11:05 AM

LOL! They are doing it on purpose now.

Brian on February 25, 2010 at 11:06 AM

Surprise!

You’re right, Brian. It’s just satire now.

Jaibones on February 25, 2010 at 11:08 AM

If it is because of the snow, why are the numbers down in NY and up in NC?

ouldbollix on February 25, 2010 at 11:09 AM

Nobody expects the Obama inquisition.

Daggett on February 25, 2010 at 11:09 AM

It’s never going to improve significantly until Obama has a complete change of mind over what actually creates the conditions to spur job growth.
And that ain’t happening because he would rather wreck this country than admit his “government as savior” is a total failure.

jjshaka on February 25, 2010 at 11:10 AM

“That doesn’t come from heavy snowfalls, but from a persistently negative outlook on economic growth.”

Snowall?

Hurricane Barack.

Hot air spins into cold reality.

NoDonkey on February 25, 2010 at 11:11 AM

Just as I expected.

Elizabetty on February 25, 2010 at 11:11 AM

If only we could have some global warming.

LibTired on February 25, 2010 at 11:13 AM

I am stunned by this unexpected report!

Dick Turpin on February 25, 2010 at 11:14 AM

Despite the AP’s aseertions that improved employment numbers were threatened by the the recent deluge of snowfall across the eastern seaboard, job creation is frozen by the frigid enviroment caused by the Obamanable Snowman’s terrorizing the entrepenurial denizens who huddle in hibernation waiting for the winter of our discantent to pass.

They will not re-emerge from their slumber till the rejuvenitive spring of Capitalism warms the frozen tundra and brings its attendent birth of economic activity inimical to a free and unfettered people.

Archimedes on February 25, 2010 at 11:14 AM

By now, even at MSNBC they must be reading this as:
“Today, unemployment rose un- *GAAAK* *ACCKKK* *GAGGG* -expectedly…

eeyore on February 25, 2010 at 11:14 AM

That ‘snowstorm’ story is bullshit! You don’t IMMEDIATELY file a claim, IIRC, there’s a waiting period of two weeks. Has the storm being going on for TWO WEEKS?

I think it’s time that we UNEXPECTEDLY fire these idiots who are always UNEXPECTEDLY surprised.

GarandFan on February 25, 2010 at 11:14 AM

Nobody expects the Obama inquisition.

Daggett on February 25, 2010 at 11:09 AM

Olbermann: “Nobody expects the Obama inquisition! Our chief weapon is propaganda… propaganda and fear…fear and propaganda…. Our two weapons are fear and propaganda…and ruthless efficiency…. Our *three* weapons are fear, propaganda, and economy-destroying efficiency…and an almost fanatical devotion to the One…. Our *four*…no… *Amongst* our weapons…. Amongst our weaponry…are such elements as fear, propaganda…. I’ll come in again.”

Midas on February 25, 2010 at 11:16 AM

Dang that global warming for making it snow! See? It really is Bush’s fault! /sarc

KeepOhioRed on February 25, 2010 at 11:16 AM

can i haz moar jobz?

blatantblue on February 25, 2010 at 11:16 AM

Since I don’t follow these stats, and don’t know the lingo I’m curious. There are various breakdowns — regions, subregions and states — in the report. Do the increases indicate the layoffs emanated from the blizzard areas or even in that timeframe? I do see that California, New York and Pennsylvania are mentioned as having the largest increases but then there’s the lingo.

Dusty on February 25, 2010 at 11:16 AM

“No one expects the AP Spinners Disquistion!”

/except conservatives everywhere

Doorgunner on February 25, 2010 at 11:17 AM

Exit question – Will the AP/Reuters find a new adverb by November, or will the Republican tsunami also be “unexpected” (with a bit of “tantrum” thrown in in homage to Peter Jennings)?

steveegg on February 25, 2010 at 11:18 AM

Anyone want to go on record now as to what we EXPECT for next month?

I EXPECT that we will continue to have job losses. So it will not be UNEXPECTED to me.

barnone on February 25, 2010 at 11:19 AM

Sounds bad enough that O might want to start considering the cancellation of midterm elections. How could he fix this with a GOP dominated Congress?

a capella on February 25, 2010 at 11:19 AM

Ignorant wingnuts… don’t you know that every economic indicator is a “lagging” indicator?

The Recovery has been underway since June and is gaining speed every day. But we won’t reach economic Nirvana until we get single-payer.

mankai on February 25, 2010 at 11:19 AM

I would have thought that the snow would have caused a jump in government employment, as cities and states shoveled money at the snow shovelers.

Count to 10 on February 25, 2010 at 11:20 AM

O/T
“It was UNEXPECTED that Obama would claim everything good is in his bill and the Repulicans should just agree to sign on at the Healhcare Summit today.”

barnone on February 25, 2010 at 11:21 AM

This is simply an experiment gone awfully bad. Odumbo has no business running a country.

rjoco1 on February 25, 2010 at 11:21 AM

What a dying private sector economy looks like.

Be sure and push the PLAY button.

Dave R. on February 25, 2010 at 11:22 AM

“Unexpectedly

That’s what you are

Unexpectedly

Can’t count that far

“Saved or Created” is so risible

Your job growth, it is invisible

I think you’ll be unemployed

Unexpectedly too-ooo!”

Noel on February 25, 2010 at 11:24 AM

Somewhere on the BLS site I found a report claiming the snowstorm had zero effect on the claims since people file electronically.

There are a few reports about the “alarming” (Adverb alert) number of homeless. Shelters everywhere are maxed out and food pantry shelves are empty, but this stuff isn’t getting any coverage.

Reid’s jobs bill isn’t going to help either, nor will the 100 billion house version. There is no DEMAND and producers are still bunkering up because they know Bozo’s tax bombs are incoming.

Real tax cuts, not tax credits are the solution. JFK did it and it worked. Obama doesn’t actually want to fix the economy. Its his fervent desire to keep us as miserable as possible for as long as possible hoping it will wear us into capitulation.

But that just isn’t gonna work here. (cue voice Rush dressed as Leonidas) THIS IS AMERICA!

dogsoldier on February 25, 2010 at 11:26 AM

How many times do Obama and the Democrats have to be proven wrong before the dim bulbs in the media will expect it?

Scrappy on February 25, 2010 at 11:28 AM

Obamanable Snowman

Archimedes on February 25, 2010 at 11:14 AM

Heh. That’s a perfect description of the real dangerous blizzard that has hit Washington. Perfect!

jwolf on February 25, 2010 at 11:31 AM

Catch the current take on our economy by PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS, the Father of Reaganomics.*

Roberts was interviewed last week with the release of his new book. According to the 1968 federal formula determining the unemployment rate, the government would acknowledge that our current rate of unemployment is already 27%–NOT COUNTING the so-called “under-employed” that adds over 10% more to the figure.

*Roberts wrote the Kemp-Roth bill and was assistant secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan administration. He was associate editor of the Wall Street Journal editorial page and contributing editor of National Review. He is author or co-author of eight books, including The Supply-Side Revolution (Harvard University Press). He has held numerous academic appointments, including the William E. Simon chair in political economy, Center for Strategic and International Studies, Georgetown University, and senior research fellow, Hoover Institution, Stanford University. He has contributed to numerous scholarly journals and testified before Congress on 30 occasions. He has been awarded the U.S. Treasury’s Meritorious Service Award and the French Legion of Honor. He was a reviewer for the Journal of Political Economy under editor Robert Mundell.

maverick muse on February 25, 2010 at 11:31 AM

Yes, but the government workforce is growing. So that’s nice. I guess.

lorien1973 on February 25, 2010 at 11:31 AM

The least they could do is crack open a theaurus for a substitute word for unexpectedly. Or may I suggest… a phrase like “despite what the democrat party has been promising us and we media toadies sold you,“….

IlikedAUH2O on February 25, 2010 at 11:32 AM

Never mind. I think I have it. Table six lists initial claims by state:

Blizzard area (?) — Jan Initial Claims
Maryland 2586
DC -2
Delaware 406
Penn 16430
Virginia 6570
W Va. -2
NJ 7506
(any other I should add?)

WRT Maryland the Jan # doubled Dec’s. PA’s and NJ’s were about the same. The clearing out of backlogs doesn’t make sense for the latter two.

Top states in Jan IC’s
CA 46474
NY 28309
PA 16430
MI 16035
WI 15465

Dusty on February 25, 2010 at 11:33 AM

Couldn’t they start using ‘inexpicably’ or something new?

percysunshine on February 25, 2010 at 11:34 AM

OMG – someone actually reference a page number!

Result = Obama grins…

Jussi on February 25, 2010 at 11:35 AM

What a dying private sector economy looks like.
Be sure and push the PLAY button.

Dave R. on February 25, 2010 at 11:22 AM

Click on this for map projection of November, 2010:
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_Q0lTtPVTG40/SEthS5n8MYI/AAAAAAAAPTw/yVbBBLch1aU/s320/US+Black+Map.jpg

BigAlSouth on February 25, 2010 at 11:36 AM

To quote Inigo Montoya from the Princess Bride:

“I do not think that this means what ‘they’ think is means”

shooten on February 25, 2010 at 11:37 AM

In other news…the sun unexpectedly rose again this morning.

Pilgrim on February 25, 2010 at 11:38 AM

Inconceivable!

faol on February 25, 2010 at 11:41 AM

I EXPECT that we will continue to have job losses. So it will not be UNEXPECTED to me.

barnone on February 25, 2010 at 11:19 AM

Yes, but through the magic of “statistical adjustment” and disappearing workers, the unemployment will continue to decline.

Dusty on February 25, 2010 at 11:33 AM

Was there a blizzard in January?

jarodea on February 25, 2010 at 11:41 AM

This administration is clearly beyond their level of competence. They are all academics and public officials whou have never actually held a private-sector job. It is as if when there is a downturn in the economy they all go skittering to their old macroeconomics textbook from college to find out what they should do about it.

It would be merciful if the leaders of the Dem party had “the talk” with Obama, he resigns, then we could all spend the next three years laughing at the antics of President Biden.

highhopes on February 25, 2010 at 11:43 AM

So why didn’t the geniuses that the media love to quote “expect” this?

To be fair, they were told that global warmingscience was settled. They didn’t expect to ever see snow again.

MikeA on February 25, 2010 at 11:44 AM

Barracky boy and the Dems think their popularity is linked to this rising number!

Cybergeezer on February 25, 2010 at 11:45 AM

Obamaa clearly did not want to debate Paul Ryan – interesting…

Jussi on February 25, 2010 at 11:45 AM

They should just come out and say it: “Unemployment rose unexpectedly due to AWG caused snow storms.”
 
The liberal/progressive/marxist response, another non-stimulating stimulus and conniving on how to get the budget busting healthcare takeover accomplished.
 
It is clear now. The intent is to create a financial and economic disaster that gives the libprogarxists an excuse to take over everything.

ClanDerson on February 25, 2010 at 11:46 AM

Forgot to add, the AP pinheads who write this stuff are as dumb as a box of rocks. Sorry, there’s just no other way to say it.
 
Hey AP, how about a piece that discusses the real cause of the economic problems rather than trying to give cover to people who don’t deserve the least bit of consideration for creating and maintaining this mess.

ClanDerson on February 25, 2010 at 11:50 AM

BTW I think there may be a typo in the BLS report. The unadjusted figure is approximately 40,000 claims less than the adjusted number and that just never happens.

The unadjusted number is almost always a lot more, on two occasions almost twice as much.

BTW and on a related topic, housing really hit the skids last month. Yep, the economy is just boomin.

Since we have some lyricists here any of you interested in helping me with this?

Obamaville (To the melody of Martgueritaville)

Put up a pup tent
Dunno where my house went
Or my wife or fam’ly

I sure didn’t choose it
dunno how I could lose it

God, please help me hang on

Wastin away in Obamaville,
Used up all of my checks
Some people claim
George Bush is too blame,

But I know, its Obama’s fault.

Now they don’t count me
Guess I’ll go hungry
At least I have
Someplace to sleep

While Obama Parties
and dresses so smartly

Just doesn’t care what’s goin’ on

Wastin away in Obamaville,
Used up all of my checks
Some people claim
George Bush is too blame,

But I know, its Obama’s fault.

dogsoldier on February 25, 2010 at 11:51 AM

[jarodea on February 25, 2010 at 11:41 AM]

No, but I think they are saying the IC’s from Jan weren’t logged previously because of the snowstorms. Now that unemployment processors are back to work they are catching up on the backlog and the numbers in these previously snowbound areas are rising. But the numbers for January don’t reflect that in the states that were snowbound.

At least that is how I read it. I could be misreading the meaning ’cause I’m not familiar with the lingo but I doubt it. However, it could be what BLS is saying is different than how the news is being reported.

Dusty on February 25, 2010 at 11:53 AM

careful there Ed, naturoboy may find this whole topic racist. /sarc

jbh45 on February 25, 2010 at 11:54 AM

I don’t think that word means what you think it means.

-MattD

hawksruleva on February 25, 2010 at 11:55 AM

And there’s an acute shortage of lemonade stands in my neighborhood! Are they being counted in the unemployed? Are they covered under any stimulus program? Is climate change killing all the lemon trees?
What about the children?

Cybergeezer on February 25, 2010 at 12:01 PM

Why did jobloss claims rise unexpectedly even though it should be expected that the snow would lay of workers?

Easy: It was expected that they would quickly get SHOVEL-READY JOBS!

Badoom, Ching!

shick on February 25, 2010 at 12:03 PM

A couple of articles recently pointed out that stimulus dollars poured into DC at a rate nearly 4 times higher than any state. Also, DC was one of the few areas reporting stable house prices.

So the pols and economists living there look around at DC and say ‘what recession?’ Times is good.

GnuBreed on February 25, 2010 at 12:05 PM

LOL! They are doing it on purpose now.

Brian on February 25, 2010 at 11:06 AM

Has to be an inside joke or something at media outlets.

No way they can be this clueless….. oh wait.

Nevermind.

Yakko77 on February 25, 2010 at 12:05 PM

How many gay conservatives were laid off?

Akzed on February 25, 2010 at 12:10 PM

But government health care is so much more important than keeping your home and having a job!

Right Barry?

People thrown out of their houses and unemployed need health care, too!

That’ll make a great rallying cry.

In November 2010, especially.

profitsbeard on February 25, 2010 at 12:13 PM

The snowstorm excuse is really a snow job that the media is using to explain yet another ‘unexpected’ drop in employment. How many ‘unexpected’ job losses do we have now? At least one each month? What isn’t unexpected is the media once again carrying water for the incompetant Obama administration.

docdave on February 25, 2010 at 12:15 PM

People who own construction companies know that their businesses lay off in the cold months. However, to keep revenue from falling to zero during these months, many have snow removal services. This allows their laid off workers to earn some money during the lull periods. With the huge amounts of snow that has crippled the East Coast, many of these construction workers are picking up work by removing snow. Also, we’ve experienced this weather since the middle of December, so most of these workers have been unemployed since then. You can’t do outside work when you’ve experienced 18″ (at least near Delaware) of snow in December.

djaymick on February 25, 2010 at 12:21 PM

Sooo same results, month after month, when does it stop becoming unexpected?

Alden Pyle on February 25, 2010 at 12:26 PM

mankai on February 25, 2010 at 11:19 AM

Obama’s depression is a lagging indicator.

Johan Klaus on February 25, 2010 at 12:27 PM

Everyone together now……

UNEXPECTEDLY!

thebrokenrattle on February 25, 2010 at 12:30 PM

I’m waiting for the coup de gras of unexpectedness:

“Global Warming unexpectedly exposed as complete fraud”

BobMbx on February 25, 2010 at 1:00 PM

I think the world economy will be in a free fall for years.

Eventually, we’ll realize that government growth, taxation and regulation is the fundamental cause.

TheSitRep on February 25, 2010 at 1:02 PM

Unexpectedly unexpected.

crazy_legs on February 25, 2010 at 11:05 AM

Unexpectedly unexpected expectations.

davidk on February 25, 2010 at 1:07 PM

Bambi’s unexpectedly unexpected legacy.

DDT on February 25, 2010 at 1:08 PM

When will the rise in domestic abuse start?

davidk on February 25, 2010 at 1:09 PM

It’s snow’s fault.

Or it could be the “teabaggers”. Wouldn’t want to jump to conclusions.

HowardRoarke on February 25, 2010 at 1:09 PM

How many ‘unexpected’ job losses do we have now?

They are “unexpected” because the media expected Obama’s policies to actually work. Which shows what they know.

When unemployment crept over 5% under Bush, we had the sob stories, the homeless stories, the direct attempt to blame every McDonald’s hamburger flipper job loss on George.

But now that unemployment’s over 10% under Barry?

There is no earthly way to tell why.

NoDonkey on February 25, 2010 at 1:28 PM

maverick muse on February 25, 2010 at 11:31 AM

Can you post a link to that article?

dogsoldier on February 25, 2010 at 1:33 PM

The unexpected unexpectedness of the unexpect,
created yet more, unexpectedly.

elderberry on February 25, 2010 at 1:47 PM

Ed, you’ve done a great job with the posts on the economic trends, but dang, its getting too easy.

james23 on February 25, 2010 at 2:04 PM

They really don’t expect it. The expect unicorns and Skittles. After all, Obama is in charge.

Buford Gooch on February 25, 2010 at 2:04 PM

Well, it is getting worse out there. My company just cut jobs too… even laying off people overseas to preserve US jobs, Amazingly enough.

And this is the first layoff’s we’d had attributed to slow sales instead of performance reviews, so it’s getting bad out there. I’m just glad I survived the grim reaper. So far.

Vanceone on February 25, 2010 at 2:13 PM

The sun rose unexpectedly this morning as the Cubs did not win the World Series, unexpectedly.

Shouldn’t Rahm Emanuel get a by-line credit?

Angry Dumbo on February 25, 2010 at 2:33 PM

Well this time I can see why it is “unespected”. Is our economy usually so fragile that a SNOWSTORM causes a measurable rise in unemployment? Seriously!?!?

I feel better about the job our overlords are doing. No really I do.

Lily on February 25, 2010 at 2:36 PM

Just another consequence of “climate change!” Global warming causes bigger snowstorms, which cause unemployment to increase. And it’s Bush’s fault we didn’t do something about global warming before it was too late. See?

franklin on February 25, 2010 at 2:46 PM

When did Captain Renault become a reporter for the A.P.

On the other hand, at least he admits being corrupt.

malclave on February 25, 2010 at 2:59 PM

The number of new claims for unemployment benefits jumped unexpectedly last week as heavy snows caused layoffs to rise.

In addition, many state agencies in the mid-Atlantic and New England regions that process the claims were closed due to the storms and are now clearing out backlogs, a Labor Department analyst said.

The department said Thursday that first-time claims for unemployment insurance rose by 22,000 to a seasonally adjusted 496,000. Wall Street analysts polled by Thomson Reuters expected a drop to 455,000.

Bad weather can cause job losses in construction and other industries sensitive to weather.

This is not out of the ordinary, but still disgusting. Is that objective journalism? It sounds like some stupid college freshman, fresh out of his first day of political science in which his aging hippie professor told him the wonders of The One. “Well, the economy doesn’t suck as bad as you say, ya know, cause… um… bad weather can cause job losses in construction… and, um… other places.”

WTF.

Also, I want to keep going on the record as stating that Obama’s goal to destroy our economy system and bring the country to it’s knees begins (and possibly ends, depending on how long it takes to roll out) next year… but in a desperate attempt to save some seats (and I say odds are 50/50 it’ll work because there are a lot of idiots in this country [see 11/4/2008]), he’s going to pump the other unspent 2/3 of the “stimulus” to create a phony jobs recovery. Coupled with millions of temporary census jobs, he’ll probably fool just enough people.

RightWinged on February 25, 2010 at 4:14 PM

Where’s the photo of the chick on her cell phone?

darwin-t on February 25, 2010 at 6:58 PM

Maybe they’ll just “adjust” the numbers down a few tenths of a percent like they did last month. Heck, folks will read that in the papers and totally forget they’re out of work.

Actually, they know that our little system is shutting down…slowly but surely. That’s what they want, after all, but they have to continue the illusion of economic growth which is reminiscent of the fictitious lottery winners in Nineteen Eighty-Four…it’s always somebody way over there who won, regardless of where you live, so you don’t actually know anybody whoever won-because there simply weren’t any winners…the money just disappeared into the Inner Party treasury.

So, if they lie and say folks are getting jobs in Spokane and I live in Wheeling, I’m none the wiser.

Dr. ZhivBlago on February 25, 2010 at 10:40 PM

Despite the AP’s aseertions that improved employment numbers were threatened by the the recent deluge of snowfall across the eastern seaboard, job creation is frozen by the frigid enviroment caused by the Obamanable Snowman’s terrorizing the entrepenurial denizens who huddle in hibernation waiting for the winter of our discantent to pass.

They will not re-emerge from their slumber till the rejuvenitive spring of Capitalism warms the frozen tundra and brings its attendent birth of economic activity inimical to a free and unfettered people.

Archimedes on February 25, 2010 at 11:14 AM

Too funny. Very well done, sir. You sound like one of those nature reporters tracking the hibernation of grizzly bears. LOL.

Subsunk

Subsunk on February 25, 2010 at 11:24 PM