Oh my: Student poll analysis of midterms shows GOP might pick up … 60 seats

posted at 8:42 pm on February 23, 2010 by Allahpundit

I confess to not having read this guy’s blog before, but (a) his sidebar resume is certainly respectable and (b) he’s taken seriously enough by Jonathan Chait to have earned a post today at TNR showcasing his glorious, glorious results.

The standard “anything can happen before November” caveat applies, but between this and Charlie Cook’s warning last week, we’re slowly moving from a “can the GOP take back the House?” reality to a “how many more seats than the Dems will the GOP end up with?” reality. Here’s where things stand on the Great Liberal Realignment of 2008:

The generic House ballot is tilting to Republicans in ways not seen… ever. Or as Michael Barone put it, the Republican margin currently seen is “historically unprecedented”. To those unfamiliar with the generic ballot, it is the question asked on national surveys that goes something like this “If the elections for Congress were being held today, which party’s candidate would you vote for in your Congressional district?” I have often (in my own head) questioned the usefulness of the generic ballot because House elections are held in districts not nationally, and surveys are only getting at most a few respondents from each district for each survey. But the fact of the matter is that vast majority of research indicates (see Charles Franklin, Matthew Shugart, and the Pew Research Center among others) that if you properly use the results from the question, you can get a pretty good idea of what is going to happen…

How will the generic ballot results from 2010 at this point translate into vote in the general election? Based off the Bafumi et al. regression (see page 6), we would expect Republicans to win the national vote by anywhere from 7.3% (all polls but Rasmussen and Republican pollsters) to 9.3% (all polls), which extends well beyond the root-mean-sqaured error. Thus, I have a hard time believing based off the polling that the Democrats will win the national party House vote…

With current polling in conjunction with Bafumi et al.’s paper predicting a Republican national vote between 53.6% and 54.7%, the Republicans could easily gain 50-60 seats from their current 178. Gains of greater than 60 seats also look quite possible. Even in the best case scenario for the Democrats, it would seem that holding the House would be very, very difficult.

No less a figure than Bill Clinton admitted to Fox News(!) that things are starting to feel a bit like 1994 before qualifying it by saying that he thinks the Dems can still avert disaster. Which may be true: I can think of one surefire way to bleed enough votes from the GOP that 20 or so weakened House Democrats might squeak through. The DCCC’s hard at work on the idea already, in fact, rolling out a new website just this morning dedicated to sowing discord in the conservative ranks. Behold, my friends … the Palin primaries.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

Heaven Help us!

daesleeper on February 23, 2010 at 8:46 PM

Too much time left to be optimistic.

blatantblue on February 23, 2010 at 8:46 PM

A student poll?

Soon as it seems younger voters aim Republican en masse, expect the Dems to want to raise the voting age back to 21.

Liam on February 23, 2010 at 8:47 PM

Palin can be very very dismissive even if she can’t spell it.

happyfeet on February 23, 2010 at 8:47 PM

That’s not a chipmunk, it’s a prairie dog. I know, I’ve sent many of them to prairie dog heaven.

Bishop on February 23, 2010 at 8:48 PM

The obligatory exit question passed over for a chipmunk? A 5 sec chipmunk?

/

ted c on February 23, 2010 at 8:48 PM

Dick Morris predicted this a way’s back. And I said the night Obama got elected the fools would overreach and lose the House and the Senate.

John the Libertarian on February 23, 2010 at 8:49 PM

which, that was a comment for a different thread. On a different blog. Too many winders. Sorry.

But the general principle obtains I think.

happyfeet on February 23, 2010 at 8:49 PM

Unprecedented.

HowardRoarke on February 23, 2010 at 8:49 PM

And I said the night Obama got elected the fools would overreach and lose the House and the Senate.

John the Libertarian on February 23, 2010 at 8:49 PM

and they’ve been overreaching alright…. I have been stunned by the magnitude and the frequency of the overreach.

ted c on February 23, 2010 at 8:50 PM

I love “the Dramatic Prarie Dog”. Thank God for Japanese television.

rihar on February 23, 2010 at 8:50 PM

I’m envisioning the Democratic campaign slogans come August: “A vote for Reid is a vote against one party control of Capitol Hill.”

LastRick on February 23, 2010 at 8:51 PM

I’m investing in Jell-O pudding.

Free Constitution on February 23, 2010 at 8:51 PM

The DCCC’s strategy is predicated on the idea that Palin will derail any candidate she happens to support, especially if the candidate happens to be a Tea Party member. That’s just a foolish assumption. The public has a more positive perspective of both Palin and the Tea Party movement than the dopes at the DCCC can grasp.

anXdem on February 23, 2010 at 8:51 PM

From the Palin’s Primaries site:

Recently Sarah Palin declared that she will be getting involved in Republican primaries like she did in her losing effort in last fall’s special election in Upstate New York.

Okay, right off the bat, epic distortion. A lot of reasons Hoffman barely lost that election, and it had nothing to do with Sarah.

John the Libertarian on February 23, 2010 at 8:52 PM

Now, that’s change I want to believe in.

What say you, HappyPenguin?

MeatHeadinCA on February 23, 2010 at 8:52 PM

We’re all socialists now…wait…

Weight of Glory on February 23, 2010 at 8:52 PM

Based off the Bafumi et al. regression (see page 6), we would expect Republicans to win the national vote by anywhere from 7.3% (all polls but Rasmussen and Republican pollsters) to 9.3% (all polls), which extends well beyond the root-mean-sqaured error. Thus, I have a hard time believing based off the polling that the Democrats will win the national party House vote…

that’s a measure of precision similar to a SD. As it stands now, it appears not if the R’s win back the House, but by how much?

ted c on February 23, 2010 at 8:53 PM

I’d vote for the chipmunk… or prairie dog. Or whatever it is.

Just as long as it takes a Democrat’s place.

irishspy on February 23, 2010 at 8:54 PM

Okay, right off the bat, epic distortion. A lot of reasons Hoffman barely lost that election, and it had nothing to do with Sarah.

John the Libertarian on February 23, 2010 at 8:52 PM

How can you not blame Sarah? I mean, after Scud Bomb endorsed Hoffman, the only way Hoffman could have lost is because of those TEA people.

MeatHeadinCA on February 23, 2010 at 8:54 PM

I believe it, I really think there isn’t a Democrat in this country safe this year.

rob verdi on February 23, 2010 at 8:54 PM

ted c on February 23, 2010 at 8:50 PM

And doesn’t it strike you all these empty threats of reconciliation to ram through healthcare are like kids on the playground threatening to get a lawyer and sue each other? The Dems are talking it up because they have NOTHING to stand on, no leverage whatsoever, they have utterly failed.

John the Libertarian on February 23, 2010 at 8:55 PM

is that a gopher? herrrre gopher gopher…

/billmurray

ted c on February 23, 2010 at 8:55 PM

And doesn’t it strike you all these empty threats of reconciliation to ram through healthcare are like kids on the playground threatening to get a lawyer and sue each other? The Dems are talking it up because they have NOTHING to stand on, no leverage whatsoever, they have utterly failed.

John the Libertarian on February 23, 2010 at 8:55 PM

Yeah, sure. Reminds me of the “I triple dog dare ya” on the playground in “A Christmas Story” where Fritz stuck his tongue on the pole.

ted c on February 23, 2010 at 8:57 PM

by the way that anti-Palin site cheered me to know end, if the Democrats are that freaking lame they really will get blown out of the water.

rob verdi on February 23, 2010 at 8:58 PM

Behold, my friends … the Palin primaries.

Ok, I’ll bite. How exactly is that supposed to be effective to any ends? Don’t they realize that no one will care about the races the DCCC will focus on. But everyone will care about the ones Palin focuses on? Hey DCCC! you’re a congressional campaign committee, hardly the front from which to counter anything Palin may or may not do. But hey, have at it!

Weight of Glory on February 23, 2010 at 8:58 PM

which, that was a comment for a different thread. On a different blog. Too many winders. Sorry.

But the general principle obtains I think.

happyfeet on February 23, 2010 at 8:49 PM

PDS much? You are really obsessed with her.

conservative pilgrim on February 23, 2010 at 8:58 PM

by the way that anti-Palin site cheered me to no end, if the Democrats are that freaking lame they really will get blown out of the water.

rob verdi on February 23, 2010 at 8:58 PM

Reminds me of the “I triple dog dare ya” on the playground in “A Christmas Story” where Fritz stuck his tongue on the pole.

Only now, the dares are the same, it’s still cold and snowy outside, there’s still a big pole, and all the dudes in DC have been ……… for the last year.

ted c on February 23, 2010 at 8:59 PM

and they’ve been overreaching alright…. I have been stunned by the magnitude and the frequency of the overreach.

ted c on February 23, 2010 at 8:50 PM

Stunned and OUTRAGED!!!!!!!!!!!
November cannot get here quick enough…

huskerdiva on February 23, 2010 at 8:59 PM

Stunned and OUTRAGED!!!!!!!!!!!
November cannot get here quick enough…

huskerdiva on February 23, 2010 at 8:59 PM

Patience young Jedi….. the Force is strong in you.
/obiwan off

ted c on February 23, 2010 at 9:00 PM

The obligatory exit question passed over for a chipmunk? A 5 sec chipmunk?

ted c on February 23, 2010 at 8:48 PM

That was no chipmunk, that was Keith Olberman.

entropent on February 23, 2010 at 9:00 PM

When will the GOP go negative against Barack?

They should have a site replete with the bowing Barack and track his successes in Virginia,New Jersey and Masschussets.

promachus on February 23, 2010 at 9:01 PM

it’s still cold and snowy outside, there’s still a big pole,

ted c on February 23, 2010 at 8:59 PM

sorry, man, can’t stop thinking of adding pole dancing to the winter olympics.

John the Libertarian on February 23, 2010 at 9:01 PM

Behold, my friends … the Palin primaries.

Interesting… where have I seen that Palin pic pushed before?

You doing a little website design for the Democratic Party, Allahpundit?

malclave on February 23, 2010 at 9:01 PM

That was no chipmunk, that was Keith Olberman.

entropent on February 23, 2010 at 9:00 PM

who(s) (th)dat…?/

ted c on February 23, 2010 at 9:01 PM

Soon as it seems younger voters aim Republican en masse, expect the Dems to want to raise the voting age back to 21.

Liam on February 23, 2010 at 8:47 PM

I’ve heard grumblings about doing just this from Republicans and conservatives as well, especially so after Obama got elected.

To be fair…they’re not without some merit.

But angry words is where the sentiment is going to stay for the forseeable future.

As for the seat-picking-up, I personally can’t wait for it. Perhaps an epic showing of incompetence and corruption by both political parties in under 2 years will make America start to look for alternatives.

Dark-Star on February 23, 2010 at 9:02 PM

The Dems played the Palin strategy in Mass. Need I say more?

takeamericabackin10 on February 23, 2010 at 9:03 PM

sorry, man, can’t stop thinking of adding pole dancing to the winter olympics.

John the Libertarian on February 23, 2010 at 9:01 PM

agree. It ought to be the event performed by the women’s curling teams during the time between sliding the stone and it arriving at the target.

Ready! Slide! Dance! Drink.

It’d make curling a heckuva lot more interesting to watch.

ted c on February 23, 2010 at 9:03 PM

That was no chipmunk, that was Keith Olberman.

entropent on February 23, 2010 at 9:00 PM

that was the “you owe me a new keyboard” comment of the night
ROFL!!!!!!!!!

huskerdiva on February 23, 2010 at 9:04 PM

The DCCC’s hard at work on the idea already, in fact, rolling out a new website just this morning dedicated to sowing discord in the conservative ranks. Behold, my friends … the Palin primaries.

Counter with the Pelosi Congress.

Make Nancy the poster girl of this election!

silverfox on February 23, 2010 at 9:04 PM

Humpbot better be stocking up on extra batteries, ’cause he’s going to be busy Nov. 2, 2010.

Editor on February 23, 2010 at 9:04 PM

November is going to be sooooooo SWEET!

GarandFan on February 23, 2010 at 9:06 PM

Okay, right off the bat, epic distortion. A lot of reasons Hoffman barely lost that election, and it had nothing to do with Sarah.

John the Libertarian on February 23, 2010 at 8:52 PM

Reason #1 – His foul teeth.

Lehosh on February 23, 2010 at 9:06 PM

Regarding the RMS error, if they’re referring to the Standard Error, that’s not referring so much to the sample variation as the _expected variation in the population_.

If so, then what they’re saying, effectively, is that these results are far beyond the margin of error.

Indeed. Not if, but how much, is the question now, if this is accurate.

Scott H on February 23, 2010 at 9:07 PM

November is going to be sooooooo SWEET!

GarandFan on February 23, 2010 at 9:06 PM

Even tho we still have 3 feet of snow on the ground I find myself longing for October………

huskerdiva on February 23, 2010 at 9:08 PM

That was no chipmunk, that was Keith Olberman smarter brother.

entropent on February 23, 2010 at 9:00 PM

FIFY

Aviator on February 23, 2010 at 9:09 PM

Make Nancy the poster girl of this election!
silverfox on February 23, 2010 at 9:04 PM

You can’t say that in the same thread that you talk about pole dancing!!!

Vince on February 23, 2010 at 9:09 PM

this post is homosexual

/robertson

blatantblue on February 23, 2010 at 9:10 PM

If so, then what they’re saying, effectively, is that these results are far beyond the margin of error.

Indeed. Not if, but how much, is the question now, if this is accurate.

Scott H on February 23, 2010 at 9:07 PM

I agree.

ted c on February 23, 2010 at 9:11 PM

Behold, my friends … the Palin primaries.


That’s
what the Dims are spending their $$$ and time on??? When you don’t have a winning philosophy and policies, then you go to Plan B: destroy the opposition with smears and character assassination.

conservative pilgrim on February 23, 2010 at 9:12 PM

shows how out of touch the Dem party is. Using Palin. do they really not understand how loved this woman is in The USA by those that do not get a steady diet of political news? they ar ein their own little echo chambers that repeats Palin is divisive (see Allah) and then start to believe it.

Palin’s name atrracts thousands, brings in 10,000′s of dollars in a day when she calls for a money bomb (see Sean duffy)

the dems using Palin would be like the GOp trying to use bill CLinton as a divisive figure in contested dem primaires. Idiots

unseen on February 23, 2010 at 9:13 PM

Make Nancy the poster girl of this election!
silverfox on February 23, 2010 at 9:04 PM

You can’t say that in the same thread that you talk about pole dancing!!!

Vince on February 23, 2010 at 9:09 PM

You’re right. I am so sorry.
I heard Tylenol PM stops those mental images and gets you to sleep real fast.

silverfox on February 23, 2010 at 9:15 PM

I pray this country survives until November. Seriously.

Marcus on February 23, 2010 at 9:15 PM

Dark-Star on February 23, 2010 at 9:02 PM

Returning the voting age won’t gain any traction anywhere long as the grumblings come from the Pubs. But you can bet your sweet bippy if younger people lean right-of-center, the Dems will be making an outcry and the MSM will carry the tune.

Never mind it was the Dems that got the voting age reduced in the first place. And I know. I voted for Ford in 1976–the year I turned 18.

Liam on February 23, 2010 at 9:17 PM

And doesn’t it strike you all these empty threats of reconciliation to ram through healthcare are like kids on the playground threatening to get a lawyer and sue each other? The Dems are talking it up because they have NOTHING to stand on, no leverage whatsoever, they have utterly failed.

John the Libertarian on February 23, 2010 at 8:55 PM

I don’t get the logic behind this. They’re keeping the public attention on Obamacare, scaring people repeatedly that it might pass after all. They’re just making things worse for themselves …

MetaThought on February 23, 2010 at 9:18 PM

Behold, my friends … the Palin primaries.

Palin needs to go away NOW…

She was asked to go on Leno… and now Tina Fey is coming back to SNL… put 2 and 2 together… it’s a setup…

ninjapirate on February 23, 2010 at 9:19 PM

Yeah, and they’ll install the beyond worthless and completely embarrassing John Boehner as Speaker, and the whole damn thing will go down in flames. The guy’s a joke. It’ll take him less than 60 days to make the GOP a joke again.

Rational Thought on February 23, 2010 at 9:20 PM

Behold, my friends … the Palin primaries.

Palin needs to go away NOW…

She was asked to go on Leno… and now Tina Fey is coming back to SNL… put 2 and 2 together… it’s a setup…

BTW, the best way to fight the left’s “boogie man” strategery is to just be ambiance, not out front and center… take an hint Palin, and get in the back…

ninjapirate on February 23, 2010 at 9:20 PM

I wish it were 60 seats in the Senate! I’ll take 60 seats in the House, though!

SouthernGent on February 23, 2010 at 9:21 PM

Soon as it seems younger voters aim Republican en masse, expect the Dems to want to raise the voting age back to 21.

[Liam on February 23, 2010 at 8:47 PM]

I can here them now: The voting age requirement is broken!

Dusty on February 23, 2010 at 9:21 PM

Hear, not here. Ugh

Dusty on February 23, 2010 at 9:22 PM

I don’t get the logic behind this. They’re keeping the public attention on Obamacare, scaring people repeatedly that it might pass after all. They’re just making things worse for themselves …

MetaThought on February 23, 2010 at 9:18 PM

There is no logic behind it. It is an utterly leaderless and feckless plan being executed in an ad hoc and “What are we gonna do today boss?” kind of way. It’s speech, speech, platitude, meeting, vacation, speech, photo op and damage control. It’s easy to judge a tree by the fruit that it produces. Considering that, this tree is bearing bushelfuls of rotten fruit.

Metaphors.

ted c on February 23, 2010 at 9:22 PM

Hi Mr. MeatHead! YES! I sure hope those dirty socialists get routed.

I’m sure Team R can do it in spite of Palin… I just like giving her a hard time.

All politics is local, they say. And Palin is nothing if not local.

happyfeet on February 23, 2010 at 9:23 PM

He’s “our” very own Nate Silver. Well, at least he’s not as much of a hack as Nate Silver.

SouthernGent on February 23, 2010 at 9:23 PM

Love the vid. The Dem strategy is lame. What’s new.

scalleywag on February 23, 2010 at 9:23 PM

That was no chipmunk, that was Keith Olberman happyfeetcheeks.

entropent on February 23, 2010 at 9:00 PM

lovingmyUSA on February 23, 2010 at 9:25 PM

Colin Powell, Americans Want Big Government, They Want To Pay More Taxes.

http://sheikyermami.com/2009/05/06/colin-powell-americans-are-looking-for-more-government-in-their-life-not-less/

He cracks me up!

Dr Evil on February 23, 2010 at 9:31 PM

lovingmyUSA you’re so mean with your scathing scathingness… I’m not even a liberal. I’m from Texas.

happyfeet on February 23, 2010 at 9:31 PM

Soon as it seems younger voters aim Republican en masse, expect the Dems to want to raise the voting age back to 21.

Liam on February 23, 2010 at 8:47 PM

I’ve heard grumblings about doing just this from Republicans and conservatives as well, especially so after Obama got elected.

Why only 21? According to the Democratic Party, people up to age 25 are “children”. Should children really be allowed to participate in adult matters such as voting and entering into contracts?

malclave on February 23, 2010 at 9:33 PM

I don’t get the logic behind this.

MetaThought on February 23, 2010 at 9:18 PM

There is no logic behind it.

ted c on February 23, 2010 at 9:22 PM

Root causes. Leftism is based solely on narcissism. They believe themselves the angels that can build utopia. And they will smear and lie and bully and oppress and slaughter their way to that vaulted aim because they are so superior.

John the Libertarian on February 23, 2010 at 9:33 PM

I don’t get the logic behind this. They’re keeping the public attention on Obamacare, scaring people repeatedly that it might pass after all. They’re just making things worse for themselves …

MetaThought on February 23, 2010 at 9:18 PM

Obama probably really believes in it and is used to getting what he wants, but most of this is to satisfy their far lefty base. The left is furious that they have blown it, can’t pass free health care for all, put more troops in Afgahnistan, not closed GITMO, still spyin on “citzens”. Pinnochio is trying to save the base. Hes’ lost the idies and will never get them back short of something really dumb by the Repubs.

If he wants to stay above Bush’s poll numbers at the end he has to throw the base a bone and its tearin up the moderate Dems. Ben Nelson Traitor D NE can’t even go out to eat when home. I mean not just afraid for their jobs afraid to go home period after the townhalls.

He still has Billions in stimulus to spend and showed last week in nevada that hes’ not afraid to use it to buy votes!

dhunter on February 23, 2010 at 9:36 PM

I’ll gladly forego Christmas presents for the next 10 years if this happens.

Midas on February 23, 2010 at 9:38 PM

That’s not a chipmunk, it’s a prairie dog. I know, I’ve sent many of them to prairie dog heaven.

Bishop on February 23, 2010 at 8:48 PM

Ahh yes, I’ve fed the scavengers a time or two myself. Good clean family fun those days.

boomer on February 23, 2010 at 9:40 PM

And doesn’t it strike you all these empty threats of reconciliation to ram through healthcare are like kids on the playground threatening to get a lawyer and sue each other? The Dems are talking it up because they have NOTHING to stand on, no leverage whatsoever, they have utterly failed.

John the Libertarian on February 23, 2010 at 8:55

Not to put too fine a point on it, but your dismissiveness of the Dhim’s smack’s of not fully grasping the nature of the enemy. The quality of their arguement or faculty of their reasoning are not even remotely germaine to feild of battle that we will confront.

Take no offense please as we are alike in what standard we rally to. To poorly assess the capabilities of and strategically superior position held by incumbency combined with demonstrable mastery of arcane election law to skew results is the wanton bravery of the foolish.

In ’10 & ’12 the Marquis de Queensbury will be utterly absent from the feild on the 4th of November, the full measure of the Machiavellian villany to come is aptly suumed in the axiom of Andrew Stern(SEIU), “In the power of persuasion? No, the persuasion of power!”

Archimedes on February 23, 2010 at 9:40 PM

Are we sure we want to defeat President Obama in 2012?

If we can keep him in office a couple of extra years, I figure Americans will be willing to rename the country “Republicanville” by 2014.

29Victor on February 23, 2010 at 9:44 PM

I don’t get the logic behind this. They’re keeping the public attention on Obamacare, scaring people repeatedly that it might pass after all. They’re just making things worse for themselves …

MetaThought on February 23, 2010 at 9:18 PM

The logic is that they know they’re going to lose, but to fundamentally change the fabric of the economy, the country, and the government forever – they are prepared to throw themselves on their sword.

They know they’re toast; why not ram home the thing that – a few election cycles from now – can potentially guarantee them getting back into power, and staying there from then on?

Once they get us all dependent on them, it’ll be damned hard if not impossible to reverse it.

Midas on February 23, 2010 at 9:44 PM

Are we sure we want to defeat President Obama in 2012?

If we can keep him in office a couple of extra years, I figure Americans will be willing to rename the country “Republicanville” by 2014.

29Victor on February 23, 2010 at 9:44 PM

Not sure there’ll be a country to rename by 2012, much less if he wins re-election. We *may* yet win the battle in 2010, but we’ve come a long way in the last year towards losing the war, and there’s a lot of damage yet to be done in the next year or three.

Midas on February 23, 2010 at 9:47 PM

I’m still not overly enthusiastic; I just know that the third party vote nutters, along with the usual GOP ineptitude will come along and save the day for the Dems by November.

Midas on February 23, 2010 at 9:50 PM

I’ve got to plagarize Ed and the AP here. Dateline November 2010: Dems “unexpectedly” lose House.

Robert17 on February 23, 2010 at 9:51 PM

This one’s better.

Mazztek on February 23, 2010 at 9:51 PM

These people are acolytes of Marx, Alinsky, Che, and allthe rest of their ilk and they hew strictly to the doctrine and blueprints as set forth by them. The reason they cannot let go of the healthcare issue is their consumate beleif in the equivilent of their patron saints, Vladimir Illyich Lenin who proclaimed that, “Medicine is the keystone of Socialism.”

Archimedes on February 23, 2010 at 9:52 PM

They know they’re toast; why not ram home the thing that – a few election cycles from now – can potentially guarantee them getting back into power, and staying there from then on?

Once they get us all dependent on them, it’ll be damned hard if not impossible to reverse it.

Midas on February 23, 2010 at 9:44 PM

Exactly, too few understand that passing of healthcare is the end of our country, it may just take five or ten years.

Aviator on February 23, 2010 at 9:55 PM

In ‘10 & ‘12 the Marquis de Queensbury will be utterly absent from the feild on the 4th of November, the full measure of the Machiavellian villany to come is aptly suumed in the axiom of Andrew Stern(SEIU), “In the power of persuasion? No, the persuasion of power!”

Archimedes on February 23, 2010 at 9:40 PM

And the Pinnochio President has a huge slush fund with no strings attached to dole out to urban areas far and wide to get out the handout seekers. The backbone of the Dhim party apparatus and vote riggin express is the inner city cesspools.

Once over 50% of the populace is on the take its merely a matter of turning out that 50% to seek further freebees and the producers are slaves with no power over their fate. Destined to work for the takers and politicians until they give up and join the ranks of the takers. This is a progression and how socialist society evolves. I fear we are very near if not past the 50%.

Pinnochio is rapidly forcing this country in the handout recieving majority with destruction of private enterprise and jobs funded by capitalism being destroyed on a daily basis.
It will take a huge push by the productive of society to stop this and then a major job and business creating leader to turn it around. It could be done if we could mobilize our forces to harvest and produce our energy. Coal, oil, nuclear, natural gas all could be the ticket to revival. Without it we may become the slaves, soon!

dhunter on February 23, 2010 at 9:57 PM

Not sure there’ll be a country to rename by 2012, much less if he wins re-election. We *may* yet win the battle in 2010, but we’ve come a long way in the last year towards losing the war, and there’s a lot of damage yet to be done in the next year or three.

Midas on February 23, 2010 at 9:47 PM

Then we can start a new one. We’ll call it Hotairica. The constitution will start with “It’s come to this” and end with “Dude.”

29Victor on February 23, 2010 at 9:57 PM

As the Federal Gummint reaches further and further into our lives and our wallets, congressional elections are no longer local. When a Nevada Senator and a California Representative can screw up everybody’s lives from Maine to Arizona, it ain’t local anymore, and I think a lot of people believe it also.

Pelayo on February 23, 2010 at 9:59 PM

That was no chipmunk, that was Keith Olberman.

entropent on February 23, 2010 at 9:00 PM

That’s Olberman!

Damn, I keep looking at it and can’t get passed it looking like Gibbs, caught in the headlights.

Yoop on February 23, 2010 at 10:01 PM

As the Federal Gummint reaches further and further into our lives and our wallets, congressional elections are no longer local. When a Nevada Senator and a California Representative can screw up everybody’s lives from Maine to Arizona, it ain’t local anymore, and I think a lot of people believe it also.

Pelayo on February 23, 2010 at 9:59 PM

Truth.

ted c on February 23, 2010 at 10:02 PM

My 50-70 seat Republican pick ups is starting to look low. If the election were tomorrow, it would be 100.

InterestedObserver on February 23, 2010 at 10:03 PM

I’m from Texas.

happyfeet on February 23, 2010 at 9:31 PM

Yeah. Austin.

Lanceman on February 23, 2010 at 10:07 PM

Should children really be allowed to participate in adult matters such as voting and entering into contracts?

malclave on February 23, 2010 at 9:33 PM

Soitenlee! Long as they vote Democrat, just like their dead ancestors always did and still do.

Liam on February 23, 2010 at 10:08 PM

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/assets_c/2010/02/RAMclr022310C_625.php

funny waterloo cartoon from ramirez.

ted c on February 23, 2010 at 10:08 PM

The constitution will start with “It’s come to this” and end with “Dude.”

29Victor on February 23, 2010 at 9:57 PM

What could go wrong?

Lanceman on February 23, 2010 at 10:09 PM

Then we can start a new one. We’ll call it Hotairica. The constitution will start with “It’s come to this” and end with “Dude.”

29Victor on February 23, 2010 at 9:57 PM

Not sure if that name really rolls off the tongue, but I’ll 2nd the starts and ends with, no prob.

Archimedes on February 23, 2010 at 10:09 PM

Boehner better be boning up on his “How to run a Congress for Dummies: 2010 Edition”

ted c on February 23, 2010 at 10:09 PM

I hate surprise chipmunk. Can we have a pre-humpbot for stories like these?

Apologetic California on February 23, 2010 at 10:13 PM

Just looked at the DCCC Palin site. Seriously, they’re still on the crib notes thing? Good lord, those people are juvenile.

CP on February 23, 2010 at 10:14 PM

Comment pages: 1 2