I say Hot Air is batting zero on this issue.

At least you’re outed as Leftwingers intent on ridiculing vast millions of Americans who do, indeed, recognize, respect and continue to vote for “social issues” that are important to them.

The speaker, also, was first applauded for his statements and immediately drowned out by Ron Paul’s “48% of attendees” in the audience “of college ages”.

So what I got from this awful CPAC10 disaster was that the Libertarians bought more tickets and worked the word, “Conservative” to now refer to the nonsense abuse of that term.

We adopted our two wonderful sons and will never look back.

Whose asking you to get a divorce??

So, even though we are child free and completely devoted to each other, we’re supposed to get divorced now?

I hate to tell you this, but there are actually people who want to define marriage as being between more than just two people. C’mon are you too intolerant to acknowledge that? Can they get a booth at the next CPAC gig?- The Zoo Keeper on February 23, 2010 at 11:05 AM

I would say they are welcome to try to promote polygamy once again in this country. Remember the Mormans? Frankly, I don’t think that it would fly. I am one of those gays who is not for gay marriage being recognized by the state or federal government.

I hate to tell you this, but there are actually people who want to define marriage as being between more than just two people. C’mon are you too intolerant to acknowledge that? Can they get a booth at the next CPAC gig?

Why not hang a sign out front, “I like to have sex with two men and three women (two of them my siblings), simultaneously.”? – Or are you too bigoted, too narrow-minded, too intolerant?? – The Zoo Keeper on February 23, 2010 at 10:25 AM

Any other silly strawman arguments that you would to propose?

If a homosexual wants to be a part of the Republican party, fine, but don’t be surprised when others get upset when they start defining Republican or conservative ideals based on who they want to have sex with. – The Zoo Keeper on February 23, 2010 at 9:44 AM

Therefore, in order to be a “true” conservative worthy of being in the Republican Party someone must be heterosexual? Why not just hang a sign out front “Nicht Juden” or “Whites Only”?

If a homosexual wants to be a part of the Republican party, fine, but don’t be surprised when others get upset when they start defining Republican or conservative ideals based on who they want to have sex with.

I can’t remember any two people being more right of center than Barry Goldwater and Ronald Reagan. Goldwater was a gay rights advocate. Ronald Reagan was the key figure who in 1978 wrote an editorial that help defeat Prop 6 in California. Prop 6 would have removed from public education homosexuals and those who allied themselves with homosexuals.

At some point, Republicans will need to get over their issues with homosexuality. Regardless of whether one believes it to be a choice or a hardwired response, it has little impact on anyone but the gay or lesbian person. We can argue that homosexuality doesn’t require legal protection, but not when we have our front-line activists referring to them as “f@ggots” or worse. That indicates a disturbing level of animosity rather than a true desire to allow people the same rights and protections regardless of their lifestyles. – Ed Morrissey

Amen

Ryan Sorba’s future is back-alley gay-bashings and white supremacist rallies I think.

happyfeet on February 22, 2010 at 12:38 AM

Ya think so?

My guess is in 10-20 years we’ll find out he was a closet case all along.